Skip main navigation

Effects of a Major Gene for Apolipoprotein A-I Concentration Are Thyroid Hormone Dependent in Mexican Americans

Originally published, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1996;16:1177–1183


    Apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) is the principal protein component of HDL cholesterol. The thyroid hormone triiodothryonine (T3) is known to be a potent mediator of expression of the apoA-I structural gene (APOA1). Using complex segregation analysis, we detected a major gene influencing plasma concentration of apoA-I and examined its interaction with T3 serum level in Mexican Americans participating in the San Antonio Family Heart Study. Strong evidence for a major locus with two alleles (A and a) determining apoA-I level was obtained when interaction with T3 was allowed. The major gene appears not to be linked to the APOA1 structural locus. Genotypes differed significantly in their relationships to T3 level. The AA and Aa genotypes showed a positive relationship with T3 level, while the rarer aa homozygote showed a strong negative relationship with T3. The relative variance in apoA-I concentration due to this major gene varied from 56% to 18%, depending on T3 level. On average, the major gene accounts for 30% of apoA-I variation, and shared-household effects account for an additional 11%. These findings suggest that thyroid hormone has an important role in the genetic control of lipoprotein metabolism.

    ApoA-I is the principal protein in HDL-C, constituting about 70% to 80% of HDL protein mass.1 It is synthesized in the small intestine and liver. In addition to its role as a structural element of HDL-C, apoA-I is an activator of LCAT, which esterifies cholesterol that is attracted to the surface of nascent HDL. This esterified cholesterol moves to the core of HDL, increasing its size and changing its shape.2 The cholesteryl ester is transported to VLDL, IDL, and LDL; taken up by the LDL receptor pathway in the liver; and eliminated from the body. By virtue of its function as a cofactor for LCAT, apoA-I plays a critical role in this process of reverse cholesterol transport, ie, the movement of cholesterol from the tissues to the liver, where it is excreted. Consistent with the importance of apoA-I for reverse cholesterol transport, several studies in humans34 and animal models5 have found an inverse association of apoA-I and atherosclerosis.

    The structural gene for apoA-I (APOA1) maps to the long arm of chromosome 11, in a gene cluster that also includes the structural loci for apoC-III (APOC3) and apoA-IV (APOA4). APOA1 is expressed in the liver and intestine. Recent studies have shown that APOA1 expression is mediated by a number of factors, including the thyroid hormone T3.6

    T3 is formed primarily by the metabolism, via monodeiodination,7 of thyroxine outside the thyroid. More than 99.5% of total T3 is bound to transport proteins, with the remaining amount forming free T3. The thyroid hormones T3 and T4 play a major role as regulators of cellular metabolism and gene expression in most organ systems and tissues.8 They appear to exert their effects by direct stimulation of transcription.8

    Effects of thyroid hormones on apoA-I have been demonstrated in numerous studies. Plasma apoA-I concentrations in women are increased in hyperthyroidism910 and decreased in hypothyroidism.11 Administration of thyroid hormone (T3 or T4) increases plasma apoA-I concentrations in rats.12 In contrast to the finding in humans, plasma apoA-I concentrations in hypothyroid rats have generally been found to be unchanged (reviewed in Reference 13).

    T3 has been shown to increase apoA-I mRNA levels in rat liver but not in the intestine.1415 Strobl et al16 found that T3 increased both APOA1 gene expression and posttranscriptional stability of RNA. Romney et al6 have shown that the regulation of APOA1 gene expression by T3 is mediated in part by a thyroid hormone response element (THRE) located at the 5′ end of APOA1. APOA1 promoter activity is increased in the presence of the THRE site and decreased in its absence. No previous studies in any species have investigated whether the effects of T3 on plasma apoA-I levels or on APOA1 gene expression are genetically mediated.

    Evidence from several family studies indicates that plasma concentration of apoA-I is influenced by genetic factors. However, previous analyses have yielded conflicting results concerning the existence and magnitude of genetic effects on apoA-I levels. In a segregation analysis of a large pedigree ascertained through cases of early myocardial infarction, Hasstedt et al17 found no evidence for genetic transmission of apoA-I level. Moll et al,18 on the other hand, obtained evidence for a major gene influencing quantitative variation in apoA-I in a sample of families at high risk for coronary artery disease. Borecki et al,19 in bivariate segregation analyses of apoA-I, apoA-II, and HDL-C in a 51-member pedigree, concluded that a major gene that influences apoA-II in this family also has pleiotropic effects on apoA-I and HDL-C. It was also postulated that a second major gene may influence apoA-I and HDL-C. In a segregation analysis of randomly ascertained families in Rochester, Minn, Moll et al20 detected a major gene influencing apoA-I levels, but only in a subset of the families. This was the first population-based study to detect a major locus effect on human apoA-I levels. In an analysis of apoA-I levels in baboons measured on two different diets, Blangero et al,21 using bivariate segregation analysis methods,22 found evidence for two major genes, in addition to polygenic factors, that affected apoA-I concentrations on the two diets. Interaction between genotype and diet could be detected for both major genes. Prenger et al,23 in a family study of cardiac catheterization patients, detected a major gene with a dominant allele responsible for elevated levels of apoA-I. In analyses of Donner Laboratory data in Genetic Analysis Workshop 8, both Xu et al24 and Blangero et al25 found evidence for a major gene controlling apoA-I levels. The Blangero group also found that apoA-I levels affected the distribution of cholesterol among HDL subclasses.

    Two studies have examined relationships between apoA-I concentrations and candidate loci. In an association study, Kondo et al26 found that in smokers, apoA-I levels are influenced by allelic variation at the CETP locus. In a sibpair study Bu et al27 concluded that a gene or genes influencing apoA-I and apoA-II levels were linked to the APOA2 locus.

    In the present study we sought to determine whether a major gene influences plasma concentrations of apoA-I and, in view of the well-established effects of T3 on apoA-I plasma concentrations, whether the expression of genes influencing apoA-I levels is mediated by T3. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that polymorphic variation at the apoA-I structural locus accounts for some of the quantitative variability in apoA-I plasma levels.



    The subjects in this study were 376 Mexican American individuals in 24 extended pedigrees ascertained as part of the San Antonio Family Heart Study, a population-based study of the genetics of atherosclerosis, diabetes, and obesity in Mexican Americans living in San Antonio, Tex. The pedigrees ranged in size from 2 to 60 examined individuals (mean=15.7) and included 146 males and 230 females. These 376 individuals resided in 225 households, with the number of households per pedigree ranging from 1 to 11. Families were ascertained without regard to any specific disease, through a randomly chosen 40- to 60-year-old proband. To be eligible, a proband was required to have at least six first-degree relatives (excluding parents) at least 16 years of age and living in San Antonio. Pedigrees include the proband and his or her spouse, and all age-eligible first-, second-, and third-degree relatives of both. Table 1 provides more detailed information regarding the composition of the pedigrees. It shows all possible pairwise relationships within the 24 pedigrees, stratified by household-sharing status.

    Data are available on numerous quantitative phenotypes related to heart disease, diabetes, and obesity in these family members. The phenotypic measures include plasma concentrations and size distributions of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins, as well as sex hormones, thyroid hormones, and fasting and 2-hour insulin and glucose. Information has been gathered on diet using a food-frequency questionnaire designed according to procedures developed and validated by Willett et al28 and modified by us using a database that included those food items which in aggregate account for 80% to 85% of the consumption of total calories, total protein, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, total carbohydrate, starch, and sucrose in Mexican Americans living in San Antonio.29 Data on other environmental covariates, including smoking behavior, alcohol use, physical activity, and prescription drug use, are also available. Genotypes have been determined for more than 20 candidate loci, and a repository of immortalized lymphocytes provides a source of DNA for each family member.


    Blood samples were obtained from participants of the San Antonio Family Heart Study after an overnight fast. Plasma and serum samples were stored as aliquots at −80°C. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Assay of ApoA-I

    Plasma concentration of apoA-I was measured at Medical Research Laboratories, Cincinnati, Ohio using a nephelometric method.3031 The interassay CV for quality control samples was 3.5%. In the current sample of 376 Mexican Americans, the mean apoA-I plasma level was 145.5 mg/dL, with an SD of 26.3 and a range of 86 to 232 mg/dL.

    Assay of T3

    Serum concentration of T3 was measured by radioimmunoassay using a commercially available kit (Diagnostic Product Corporation). Automated counting, standard curve determination, and sample estimation were performed on an LKB-Wallac 1282 Compu-Gamma counter. Quality control software developed by us was used to identify assay aberrations and inconsistencies. Data files were generated automatically using specialized software developed to interface between our pedigree database system (PEDSYS32 ) and the gamma counter. The mean T3 level in the sample of 376 individuals was 1.84 nmol/L, with an SD of 0.39 and a range of 0.86 to 3.14. The intra-assay CV was 5.9%, and the interassay CV was 8.7%.

    APOA1 Genotyping

    Lymphocyte DNA was extracted from blood samples as described elsewhere.33 All genetic markers were typed by PCR. PCR amplification reactions (20 mL total volume) used 0.5 mg of lymphocyte DNA, 1.0 pmol/mL of each oligonucleotide primer, 0.025 U/mL Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus), and buffer and nucleotide components described by the supplier. Three restriction fragment length polymorphisms were typed in the APOA1-APOC3-APOA4 region on chromosome 11: an Msp I polymorphism in the 5′ promoter region of APOA1 (heterozygosity (H)=0.44),34 an Msp I polymorphism in intron 3 of APOA1 (H=0.30),35 and an Sst I polymorphism in the 3′ flanking region of APOC3 (H=0.28).36 The sequences of amplification primers and PCR temperatures for the APOA1 promoter polymorphism and the APOC3 Sst I polymorphism are given in their respective references. The Msp I polymorphism in APOA1 intron 3 was typed by PCR using forward primer 5′-GGGATCCAGGCTCGGCATTTCTGGCAG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GCTGCAGGTGGAGGTCACGCTGTCCC-3′. PCR was achieved by using 30 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 1.0 minute), annealing (59°C for 1.5 minutes), and elongation (72°C for 2.0 minutes). The PCR products were digested with Msp I (4 U, 37°C for 4 hours) and electrophoresed on 2.0% agarose gels.

    To increase the informativeness of these loci for linkage analysis, we evaluated the three-locus haplotype for each typed individual. Because of the high gametic disequilibria among these markers, only five of the possible eight haplotypes were observed. Out of the 376 individuals sampled, 355 could be haplotyped unambiguously. Haplotype assignment for the remaining 21 individuals was handled probabilistically by conditioning on the observed marginal genotypes in the linkage analysis. The estimated heterozygosity of the APOA1/APOC3 haplotyped system was 0.61±0.01 in these pedigrees.

    Statistical Genetic Methods

    Segregation Analysis

    Major gene effects on apoA-I were detected and characterized by complex segregation analysis37 using the Pedigree Analysis Package (PAP),38 which we modified to allow the effect of an environmental covariate on a quantitative trait to depend on genotype at a major locus.

    In complex segregation analysis, various hypothetical models for the transmission of the quantitative trait are compared. Likelihood methods are used to choose the best among these models. Each model is characterized by penetrance parameters that describe the effects of genetic and nongenetic factors on the trait, and for each model, parameter values are estimated that maximize the likelihood of the pedigree data using a quasi-Newton optimization algorithm.39 Each model is compared with the most general by computing −2 times the difference in the loge likelihoods of the two models. This difference is asymptotically distributed as χ2, with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the numbers of parameters estimated in the two models.

    We evaluated a general transmission model and four restricted models: sporadic, polygenic, mendelian, and environmental. In all models, covariate effects on apoA-I levels were estimated simultaneously with other parameters. All models included random environmental and common-household effects, and all except the sporadic included a polygenic component. The mendelian, environmental, and general models included an effect of a major factor contributing to heterogeneity in apoA-I levels. In the mendelian model, this factor is a single genetic locus, and in the environmental, it is a major environmental factor. In the general model, characteristics of the major factor are estimated (that is, the factor may be either genetic or nongenetic). Three transmission probabilities, τAA, τAa, and τaa, are estimated, representing the probability that factor A is transmitted by individuals of type AA, Aa, and aa, respectively. In the mendelian model, these transmission probabilities are fixed at their mendelian expectations of 1.0, 0.5, and 0.0. In the environmental model, the three transmission probabilities are held equal, yielding random transmission between generations.

    To make the inference that a major gene is influencing the phenotype in question, all competing models except for the mendelian model must be judged to be significantly worse fitting than the general model. The hierarchical nature of these tests minimizes the potential for false inference of major loci. Therefore, modern segregation analysis is a relatively conservative technique.

    Covariate effects were simultaneously estimated within the segregation analysis. Because of the potentially large number of such effects, we first performed a preliminary screening procedure, in which all possible covariate effects were simultaneously estimated within the context of a polygenic model. This model was used to allow for the nonindependence among biological relatives so as not to inflate the type 1 error rate. Covariate effects that passed a significance test at α=0.10 were included in all subsequent genetic analyses.

    Covariates considered were sex; sex-specific age (and age2 ); serum T3 concentration; dietary intakes of alcohol, saturated fat, and cholesterol, as determined using a food-frequency questionnaire; total physical activity (assessed by interview); and the following dichotomous variables: diabetic status (according to WHO criteria), diabetic or lipid-lowering medications, exogenous sex hormones (for females), menopausal status (for females), and current smoking status.

    Because of the prior evidence that T3 directly influences APOA1 gene action, the effects of T3 were allowed to differ among major locus genotypes. We have modified the standard mixed model4041 to allow for genotype×environment interaction. In the mendelian model with genotype-specific covariate effects, the quantitative phenotype of an individual with a given major locus genotype is

    where μjk is the mean value for genotype jk (jk=AA, Aa, or aa), xi is the covariate effect, βjk is the genotype-specific regression coefficient of pi on xi for genotype jk, gi is the polygenic component, hi is a shared-household effect, and ei is the random environmental component. Equation 1 is easily extended to an arbitrary number of covariate effects whose regression coefficients, in the absence of genotype×environment interaction, involve the constraint βAAAaaa. The phenotypic variance is a function of the covariate and is given bywhere σ2m(x) is the variance component due to the major gene, σ2g to polygenes, σ2h to shared-household effects, and σ2e to random environment. The hypothesis of no interaction between major genotype and covariate is tested by testing the hypothesis that the genotype-specific regressions are equal (βAAAaaa), or alternatively, the hypothesis that the variance component associated with the major gene is not a function of the covariate [σ2m(x)=σ2m].40

    Linkage Analysis

    To test the hypothesis that the major gene is linked to a specific candidate gene, we performed linkage analysis using PAP38 with modifications.2140 In this approach, the allele frequencies, genotype-specific means, covariate effects, and other parameters obtained from segregation analysis define the penetrance function. The linkage parameter to be estimated is the recombination fraction θ between the major gene and the candidate gene. Tests of linkage were based on a comparison of the log10 likelihood of a model in which θ is estimated with one in which θ is constrained to equal 0.5 (no linkage). The difference in log10 likelihoods between these two models is called the lod score. The lod function shows the change in lod score as a function of θ. Linkage is excluded for values of the lod function <−0.834, which corresponds to a value of P=.05, assuming a χ2 distribution for the test statistic lod·2·loge(10). Similarly, since we are dealing with a prespecified hypothesis utilizing a candidate gene (ie, not a random polymorphic marker), significant support for linkage requires a value of P≤.05.


    Descriptive Statistics

    Table 2 shows the sex-specific raw means and SEs for all of the variables considered in the analysis. Females exhibit significantly higher plasma apoA-I concentrations than do males. T3 levels are not significantly different between the sexes. In this sample, there are significant differences in environmental lifestyle variables (physical activity, alcohol, diet, and smoking) between the sexes. Males have higher levels of physical activity, higher alcohol intake, higher dietary saturated fat and cholesterol, and a higher proportion of smokers than do females.

    Segregation Analysis

    Table 3 summarizes the results of the segregation analyses, with statistical tests for each restricted model compared with the general model. Results are shown for the situation in which the effects of T3 on apoA-I level are constant across genotypes (no MG×T3 interaction) and the case in which T3 effects are genotype-specific (MG×T3 interaction). When no MG×T3 interaction is allowed, no clear picture of the inheritance of apoA-I levels emerges. The sporadic model is strongly rejected and the polygenic model is nearly rejected, thus implicating a major factor. However, neither the environmental nor the mendelian model can be rejected in comparison to the general model. Thus, while a major gene effect cannot be ruled out, neither can an effect of a major environmental factor.

    In contrast, when MG×T3 interaction is allowed, our statistical inference becomes unequivocal. The only model not rejected in comparison to the general model is the mendelian model. These results suggest that a single genetic locus involving the differential effects of thyroid hormone is of major importance for apoA-I variation in this population.

    The best (most parsimonious) model for the determination of apoA-I concentration is a mendelian model in which a, the allele determining high concentrations of apoA-I, has a frequency of 0.22±0.07. The three genotypes are assumed to be in Hardy-Weinberg proportions, so that the frequencies of the three genotypes AA, Aa, and aa are 0.61±0.11, 0.34±0.08, and 0.05±0.03, respectively. (SEs for genotypic frequencies were obtained using a Taylor series approximation.) At the average T3 concentration of 1.84 nmol/L, the mean apoA-I concentrations of the three genotypes are 129.7±4.3, 149.4±7.4, and 179.5±10.9 mg/dL.

    Fig 1 shows that the three genotypes differ significantly in the relationship between apoA-I and T3 levels (χ21=4.25, P=.039), as evaluated by a χ2 statistic with 1 df, which tests the constraint βAA,Aaaa. The AA and Aa genotypes exhibit an increase in apoA-I concentration with increasing T3AA,Aa=14.2±4.0), while the rarer aa homozygote shows a strong negative relationship with T3aa=−40.5±18.0).

    The variance in apoA-I concentration can be partitioned into a component attributable to the major gene, a polygenic component (due to the additive effects of other genes that are individually undetectable), a shared-household component, and a random environmental component. There was a marginally significant influence of shared household on apoA-I variation (P=.05). On average, shared household environment accounts for 11% of the total phenotypic variation. There was also evidence for significant residual genetic effects (P=.031), which accounted for another 23% of the variation. Similarly, on average, the major gene accounts for 30% of apoA-I variation. However, given the significant interaction between the major gene and T3 serum levels, the major genic variance is a function of T3, as shown in Fig 2. The proportion of variance in apoA-I concentration due to this major gene (ie, the major genic heritability) decreases from 46% at a T3 level of 1.25 nmol/L (representing the 5th percentile of the T3 distribution) to 18% at a T3 level of 2.5 nmol/L (the 95th percentile). The upper line shows the total heritability of apoA-I including both major genic and residual genetic variation.

    Covariates that significantly influenced apoA-I concentration included sex, age, exogenous sex hormones, dietary saturated fat, and dietary cholesterol. For example, apoA-I concentration in females is 10.37±3.29 mg/dL higher than in males. There is a significant age effect in females, with an increase of 0.44±0.10 mg/dL per year. Exogenous sex hormones (coded as a dichotomous variable) increase apoA-I concentration by 12.39±4.14 mg/dL in females. ApoA-I concentration decreases with increasing consumption of dietary saturated fat (a decrease of 0.12±0.07 mg/dL per gram of saturated fat) and increases with increased dietary cholesterol (an increase of 0.012±0.005 mg/dL per gram of cholesterol).

    In the general model against which this mendelian model was tested, the estimated parameter values were close to those estimated for the mendelian model. The estimates of the transmission probabilities were τAA =0.93±0.05, τAa=0.62±0.14, and τaa =0.00±0.44. The similarity of the general and mendelian models further strengthens evidence for a major gene effect on apoA-I concentration.

    Linkage Analysis

    To determine whether the major gene that influences apoA-I concentrations is the APOA1 structural gene, we performed analyses using haplotype data for three polymorphic markers in the APOA1-APOC3-APOA4 region. Fig 3 shows the results of the linkage analysis. The maximum likelihood estimate of the recombination fraction (θ) was 0.50±0.22, indicating that there is no evidence for linkage of the major apoA-I gene with the APOA1 structural locus. Fig 3 also shows that the APOA1 locus and surrounding area can actually be excluded as the site for the putative major gene.


    Strong evidence for a major locus with two alleles (A and a) determining plasma apoA-I concentration was obtained when interaction with T3 was allowed. This finding suggests that a single locus involving the differential effects of thyroid hormone is of major importance for apoA-I variation in this population and that thyroid hormone is a major determinant of the genetic variation in this quantitative lipoprotein phenotype. The linkage results indicate that the putative major locus is not the APOA1 structural locus. The test for linkage is very specific. It excludes the APOA1 gene from being the characterized major locus; it does not exclude the APOA1 gene from playing any part in quantitative apoA-I variability. Since linkage to the APOA1 structural locus can be excluded, and given the presence of significant major gene×thyroid hormone interaction, we suggest that a variant in one of the thyroid hormone receptor genes may be the locus responsible for variation in plasma apoA-I levels. This hypothesis is currently being tested.

    Our results indicate that thyroid hormone is an important determinant of apoA-I variability in normal individuals. In other studies, we have determined that the effect of T3 on lipoprotein phenotypes is primarily genetic in origin. Genetic variation in T3 also accounts for a portion of the genetic variance in other phenotypes related to reverse cholesterol transport.42 T3 concentration accounts for ≈16% of the genetic variance in HDL-C; 21% of the genetic variance in apoA-II, another protein component of HDL-C; and 37% of the variance in LpA-I, the portion of HDL-C that contains apoA-I but no apoA-II.

    Although genetic studies of normal T3 variation are few, there is evidence that T3 concentration is itself heritable. Meikle et al43 presented data on twin pairs that suggest a heritability ranging from 0.42 to 0.98. Comuzzie et al42 conducted a quantitative genetic analysis of T3 levels in the San Antonio Family Heart Study using a maximum likelihood variance decomposition method that allowed for simultaneous estimation of covariate effects. They estimated the heritability of T3 to be 0.46±0.12, indicating that 46% of the phenotypic variation in T3 is attributable to additive genetic effects. The estimated heritability of FT3 was lower, 0.17±0.09. There appear to have been no other studies of the heritability of T3 or FT3. Similarly, there are no studies of major gene effects on T3 levels. Thus, it remains to be determined whether the T3 effects on apoA-I are mediated by genetic variation in T3.

    In summary, we have examined the genetic determinants of quantitative variability in plasma apoA-I levels in a normal Mexican American population. Our data indicate that ≈53% of the phenotypic variance in apoA-I plasma levels is due to genetic factors, with 30% being due to the effects of a single major gene. The effect of this gene is mediated by serum levels of the thyroid hormone T3, with lower levels of T3 leading to increased variation in apoA-I levels among major locus genotypes and higher levels of T3 leading to diminished differences in apoA-I levels among genotypes. This interaction between the expression of the major gene and circulating thyroid hormone is plausible given the known effects of T3 on APOA1 gene expression. Additionally, using linkage analysis, we have excluded the APOA1 structural locus as the site of this mutation. Future studies will focus on the localization of this important quantitative trait locus.

    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

    CETP=cholesteryl ester transfer protein
    CV=coefficient of variation
    HDL-C=HDL cholesterol
    LCAT=lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase
    MG=major gene
    PCR=polymerase chain reaction
    THRE=thyroid hormone response element

          Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Major genotype-specific regressions of apoA-I concentration on T3 level. AA, Aa, and aa are genotypes at a major locus influencing apoA-I concentration.

          Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Proportion of phenotypic variance in apoA-I concentration attributed to a major locus, as a function of T3 concentration.

          Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Lod function for linkage of the apoA-I major gene to markers in the APOA1/C3 structural gene.

    Table 1. Pairwise Relationships Among Examined Individuals Within 24 Mexican American Pedigrees

    Half sibling167
    3rd degree10468478
    4th degree0268268
    5th degree04848
    Total relative pairs17415251699
    Unrelated pairs8829943081
    Total pairs26245194781

    Table 2. Descriptive Statistics for Variables Considered in Analyses

    VariableMale (n=146)Female (n=230)P
    Age, y37.0±1.439.8±1.0.104
    ApoA-I, mg/dL138.3±2.0150.1±1.8<.001
    T3, nmol/L1.82±0.031.86±0.03.380
    Total physical activity, mets272.1±3.6251.5±1.7<.001
    Alcohol, g/d12.2±2.22.8±0.7<.001
    Dietary saturated fat, g/day44.0±2.136.4±1.3<.001
    Dietary cholesterol, mg/day548.9±30.1400.5±17.2<.001
    Lipid-lowering medicines, %3.4±1.51.7±0.9.331
    Exogenous sex hormones, %17.0±2.5
    Menopausal, %32.2±3.1
    Current smoker, %23.3±3.514.4±2.3.034
    Diabetic, %13.0±2.814.8±2.3.619
    Diabetic medicines, %7.5±2.28.7±1.9.679

    mets indicates metabolic equivalents.

    Values are mean±SE.

    Table 3. Segregation Analysis of ApoA-I: Model Comparisons

    No MG×T3 InteractionMG×T3 Interaction
    Modelχ2df *Pχ2df *P

    *Degrees of freedom are approximate since τaa was estimated on its lower boundary.

    This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants P01 HL45522 and R29 DK44297.


    Correspondence to John Blangero, Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, 7620 NW Loop 410, San Antonio, TX 78227. E-mail [email protected].


    • 1 Ginsberg HN. Lipoprotein physiology and its relationship to atherogenesis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am.1990; 19:211-228.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Breslow JL. Genetic basis of lipoprotein disorders. J Clin Invest.1989; 84:373-380.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Maciejko JJ, Holmes DR, Kottke BA, Zinsmeister AR, Dinh DM, Mao SJT. Apolipoprotein A-I as a marker of angiographically assessed coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med.1983; 309:385-389.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Kottke BA, Zinsmeister AR, Holmes DR, Kneller RW, Hallaway BJ, Mao SJT. Apolipoproteins and coronary artery disease. Mayo Clin Proc.1986; 61:313-320.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Rubin EM, Krauss RM, Spangler EA, Verstuuyft JG, Clift SM. Nature.1991; 353:265-267.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Romney JS, Chan J, Carr FE, Mooradian AD, Wong NCW. Identification of the thyroid hormone−responsive messenger RNA spot 11 as apolipoprotein-A1 messenger RNA and effects of the hormone on the promoter. Mol Endocrinol.1992; 6:943-950.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Engler D, Burger AG. The deiodination of the iodothryonines and of their derivatives in man. Endocr Rev.1984; 5:151-184.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Samuels HH, Forman BM, Horowitz ZD, Zheng-Sheng Y. Regulation of gene expression by thyroid hormone. J Clin Invest.1988; 81:957-967.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Muls E, Blaton V, Rosseneu M, Lesaffre E, Lamberigts G, De Moor P. Serum lipids and apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, and B in hyperthyroidism before and after treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1982; 55:459-464.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Muls E, Rosseneu M, Bury J, Stul M, Lamberigts G, De Moor P. Hyperthyroidism influences the distribution and apolipoprotein A composition of the high density lipoproteins in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1985; 61:882-889.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Muls E, Rosseneu M, Blaton V, Lesaffre E, Lamberigts G, De Moor P. Serum lipids and apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, and B in primary hypothyroidism before and during treatment. Eur J Clin Invest.1984; 14:12-15.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Wilcox HG, Frank RA, Heimberg M. Effects of thyroid status and fasting on hepatic metabolism of apolipoprotein A-I. J Lipid Res.1991; 32:395-405.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Staels B, Van Tol A, Chan L, Will H, Verhoeven G, Auwerx J. Alterations in thyroid status modulate apolipoprotein, hepatic triglyceride lipase, and low density lipoprotein receptor in rats. Endocrinology.1990; 127:1144-1152.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Davidson NO, Carlos RC, Drewek MJ, Parmer TG. Apolipoprotein gene expression in the rat is regulated in a tissue-specific manner by thyroid hormone. J Lipid Res.1988; 29:1511-1522.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Apostolopoulos JJ, Marshall JF, Howlett GJ. Triiodothryonine increases rat apolipoprotein A-I synthesis and alters high-density lipoprotein composition in vivo. Eur J Biochem.1990; 194:147-154.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Strobl W, Gorder NL, Lin-Lee Y, Gotto AM Jr, Patsch W. Role of thyroid hormones in apolipoprotein A-I gene expression in rat liver. J Clin Invest.1990; 85:659-667.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Hasstedt SJ, Albers JJ, Cheung MC, Jorde LB, Wilson DE, Edwards CQ, Cannon WN, Ash KO, Williams RR. The inheritance of high density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoproteins A-I and A-II. Atherosclerosis.1984; 51:21-29.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Moll PP, Sing CF, Williams RR, Mao SJT, Kottke BA. The genetic determination of apolipoprotein A-I levels measured by radioimmunoassay: a study of high risk pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet.1986; 38:361-372.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Borecki IB, Laskarzewski P, Rao DC. Genetic factors influencing apolipoprotein AI and AII levels in a kindred with premature coronary heart disease. Genet Epidemiol.1988; 5:393-406.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Moll PP, Michels VV, Weidman WH, Kottke BA. Genetic determination of plasma apolipoprotein A-I in a population-based sample. Am J Hum Genet.1989; 44:124-139.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Blangero J, MacCluer JW, Kammerer CM, Mott GE, McGill HC Jr. Genetic analysis of apolipoprotein A-I in two environments. Am J Hum Genet.1990; 47:414-428.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Blangero J, Konigsberg LW. Multivariate segregation analysis using the mixed model. Genet Epidemiol.1991; 8:299-316.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Prenger VL, Beaty TH, Kwiterovich PO. Genetic determination of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-I plasma levels in a family study of cardiac catheterization patients. Am J Hum Genet.1992; 51:1047-1057.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Xu JF, Prenger VL, Coresh J, Beaty TH. Two-locus and bivariate segregation analysis of HDL-C and apoA-I. Genet Epidemiol.1993; 10:605-610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25 Blangero J, Williams-Blangero S, Mahaney MC. Multivariate genetic analysis of apoAI concentration and HDL subfractions: evidence for major locus pleiotropy. Genet Epidemiol.1993; 10:617-622.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Kondo I, Berg K, Drayna D, Lawn R. DNA polymorphism at the locus for human cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is associated with high density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein levels. Clin Genet.1989; 35:49-56.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Bu X, Warden CH, Xia Y, De Meester C, Puppione DL, Teruya S, Lokensgard B, Daneshmand S, Brown J, Gray R, Rotter JI, Lusis AJ. Linkage analysis of the genetic determinants of high density lipoprotein concentrations and composition: evidence for involvement of the apolipoprotein A-II and cholesteryl ester transfer protein loci. Hum Genet.1994; 93:639-648.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Willett W, Sampson L, Stampfer M, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi S, Hennekens C, Speizer F. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol.1985; 122:51-65.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Haffner SM, Knapp JA, Hazuda HP, Stern MP, Young EA. Dietary intakes of macronutrients among Mexican Americans and Anglo Americans: the San Antonio Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr.1985; 42:1266-1275.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30 Hogle DM, Smith RS, Curtiss LK. Quantitation of plasma apolipoprotein A-I using two monoclonal antibodies in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Lipid Res.1988; 29:1221-1229.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Smith SJ, Cooper GR, Henderson LO, Hannon WH, for the Apolipoprotein Standardization Collaborating Group. An international collaborative study on standardization of apolipoproteins A-I and B, part I: evaluation of a lyophilized candidate reference and calibration material. Clin Chem.1987; 33:2240-2249.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Dyke B. PEDSYS: A Pedigree Data Management System User's Manual. San Antonio, Tex: Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research; 1989. PGL Technical Report No. 2.Google Scholar
    • 33 Hixson JE, Kammerer CM, Cox LA, Mott GE. Identification of LDL receptor gene marker associated with altered levels of LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in baboons. Arteriosclerosis.1989; 9:829-835.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Jeenah M, Kessling A, Miller N, Humphries SE. G to A substitution in the promoter region of the apolipoprotein A-I gene is associated with elevated serum apolipoprotein A-I and high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. Mol Biol Med.1990; 7:233-241.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Seilheimer JJ, Protter AA, Frossard P, Levy-Wilson B. Isolation and DNA sequence of full-length cDNA and of the entire gene for human apolipoprotein AI: discovery of a new genetic polymorphism in the apo A-I gene. DNA.1984; 3:309-317.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Hixson JE, Vernier DT, Powers PK. Detection of Sst I restriction site polymorphism in human APOC3 by the polymerase chain reaction. Nucleic Acids Res.1991; 19:196. Abstract.Google Scholar
    • 37 Elston RC, Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered.1971; 21:523-542.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38 Hasstedt SJ. Pedigree Analysis Package. Salt Lake City, Utah: Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah; 1989.Google Scholar
    • 39 Lalouel JM. GEMINI: A Computer Program for Optimization of a Nonlinear Function. Salt Lake City, Utah: Department of Medical Biophysics and Computing, University of Utah; 1979. Technical Report No. 14.Google Scholar
    • 40 Konigsberg LW, Blangero J, Kammerer CM, Mott GE. Mixed model segregation analysis of LDL-C concentration with genotype-covariate interaction. Genet Epidemiol.1991; 8:69-80.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Blangero J. Statistical genetic approaches to human adaptability. Hum Biol.1993; 65:941-966.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Comuzzie AG, Blangero J, Mahaney MC, Sharp RM, VandeBerg JL, Stern MP, MacCluer JW. Triiodothyronine exerts a major pleiotropic effect on reverse cholesterol transport phenotypes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.1996; 16:289-293.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43 Meikle AW, Stringham JD, Woodward MG, Nelson JC. Hereditary and environmental influences on the variation of thyroid hormones in normal male twins. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1988; 66:588-592.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar