Skip to main content
Research Article
Originally Published 26 March 2002
Free Access

Prevalence of Anderson-Fabry Disease in Male Patients With Late Onset Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract

Background Although studies have suggested that “late-onset” hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) may be caused by sarcomeric protein gene mutations, the cause of HCM in the majority of patients is unknown. This study determined the prevalence of a potentially treatable cause of hypertrophy, Anderson-Fabry disease, in a HCM referral population.
Methods and Results Plasma α-galactosidase A (α-Gal) was measured in 79 men with HCM who were diagnosed at ≥40 years of age (52.9±7.7 years; range, 40–71 years) and in 74 men who were diagnosed at <40 years (25.9±9.2 years; range, 8–39 years). Five patients (6.3%) with late-onset disease and 1 patient (1.4%) diagnosed at <40 years had low α-Gal activity. Of these 6 patients, 3 had angina, 4 were in New York Heart Association class 2, 5 had palpitations, and 2 had a history of syncope. Hypertrophy was concentric in 5 patients and asymmetric in 1 patient. One patient had left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. All patients with low α-Gal activity had α-Gal gene mutations.
Conclusion Anderson-Fabry disease should be considered in all cases of unexplained hypertrophy. Its recognition is important given the advent of specific replacement enzyme therapy.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is defined by the presence of unexplained myocardial hypertrophy. In the majority of patients, the disease is caused by autosomal-dominant inherited mutations in 1 of 9 genes that encode different cardiac sarcomeric proteins.1 In 1995, Nakao and colleagues2 reported a 3% prevalence of Anderson-Fabry disease in predominantly middle-aged male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) associated with diverse pathologies. The implication of their study was that this now-treatable disease is frequently undiagnosed. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Anderson-Fabry disease in a referral population of male patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM.

Methods

Patients

The study cohort was composed of 79 consecutive men with HCM who were first diagnosed at ≥40 years of age (mean, 52.9±7.7 years; range, 40 to 71 years). A total of 74 men diagnosed at <40 years of age (mean, 25.9±9.2 years; range, 8 to 39 years) were studied for comparison. All had apparently unexplained LVH with a maximum left ventricular wall thickness ≥13 mm. Clinical examination, supine 12-lead electrocardiography, and ambulatory 48-hour ECG monitoring were performed in all patients.
M-mode, 2D, and Doppler echocardiography were performed as previously described3 using a GE System V echocardiograph. The severity and distribution of LVH were assessed in the parasternal short-axis plane at the mitral valve and papillary muscle level. Maximum left ventricular wall thickness was defined as the greatest thickness in any single segment. Patterns of hypertrophy were defined in accordance with previously published methods.3 Maximal left ventricular outflow tract flow velocity was determined using continuous-wave Doppler, and pressure gradients were calculated using the simplified Bernoulli equation. Left ventricular inflow velocities were obtained from the apical 4-chamber view using pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography.

Screening for Anderson-Fabry Disease

Plasma α-galactosidase A (α-Gal) activity was measured with the fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-d-galactopyranoside (Sigma), with N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (Nacalai Tesque) used as an inhibitor of α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase as described previously.2 On the basis of previously published data, a plasma α-Gal activity of <1.2 nmol · h–1 · mL–1 was considered diagnostic of Anderson-Fabry disease.2 Plasma α-Gal activity in 89 normal healthy men (aged 52±19 years; range, 14 to 80 years) was also measured.

Genetic Analysis

Mutations in the α-Gal gene were identified by amplifying each exon using polymerase chain reaction, followed by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) and direct sequencing. Intronic oligonucleotide primers were designed using the PRIMER program (HGMP resource center, MRC Clinical Research Center). An ammonium acetate salting-out procedure was used to isolate genomic DNA from whole blood, as described previously.4 Both polymerase chain reaction and SSCP analysis were performed using previously described methods.5 All samples demonstrating an SSCP variation were directly sequenced using Dynal bead (Dynal) DNA strand separation and the Sequenase II kit (USB).4

Statistical Analysis

The χ2 test was used to compare noncontinuous variables, and the 2-tailed unpaired t test was used to compare continuous variables. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

Results

Baseline clinical data are summarized in Table 1. A total of 5 of 79 patients (6.3%) diagnosed at ≥40 years and 1 of 74 patients (1.4%) diagnosed at <40 years had low α-Gal activity (range 0.1 to 0.7 nmol · h–1 · mL–1). α-Gal activity in the remaining 147 patients was 7.4±2.7 nmol · h–1 · mL–1 (range, 2.3 to 25.0 nmol · h–1 · mL–1). Plasma α-Gal activity in the 89 controls was 8.4±2.4 nmol · h–1 · mL–1 (range, 4.8 to 17.6 nmol · h–1 · mL–1). All 6 patients with low α-Gal activity had cardiovascular symptoms at presentation. None had a family history of cardiomyopathy or Anderson-Fabry disease. All were normotensive, and 2 had an elevated serum creatinine. Retrospective clinical examination revealed angiokeratoma and acroparaesthesia in 1 patient (patient 3). Five of the 6 patients had undergone coronary angiography; 4 had angiographically normal coronary arteries, and one had a 50% stenosis in the circumflex artery (patient 1).
Table 1106482. Clinical and Echocardiographic Features of Patients
 Patients <40 Years (n=74)Patients ≥40 Years (n=79)P
Data shown as mean±SD or number (percent).
NYHA indicates New York Heart Association class; LVWT, maximum left ventricular wall thickness; LV, left ventricular; and NSVT, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
Age at diagnosis, y (range)25.9±9.2 (8–39)52.9±7.7 (40–71) 
Family history of HCM, n (%)32 (43)12 (15)0.0001
Dyspnea, n (%)   
    NYHA 155 (74)52 (66)0.25
    NYHA 218 (24)26 (33)0.24
    NYHA 31 (1)1 (1)0.96
Chest pain, n (%)   
    Exertional4 (5)8 (10)0.28
    Atypical13 (18)24 (30)0.064
    Both9 (12)4 (5)0.12
Palpitations, n (%)16 (22)19 (24)0.72
Syncope, n (%)8 (11)7 (9)0.69
LVWT, mm23±719±40.25
LV end-diastolic diameter, mm44±946±50.29
LV end-systolic diameter, mm25±927±50.37
Left atrium, mm43±1145±60.53
Gradient≥30 mm Hg, n (%)13 (18)26 (33)0.03
Pattern of LVH, n (%)   
    Asymmetric50 (68)45 (57)0.18
    Concentric8 (11)20 (25)0.02
    Distal3 (4)6 (8)0.35
    Other13 (18)8 (10)0.18
NSVT, n (%)15 (20)33 (42)0.0042
All 6 patients with low α-Gal activity had an abnormal ECG (Table 2 and Figure 1). One patient (patient 6) had been paced for symptomatic second-degree heart block and was in atrial fibrillation. The ECGs in the remaining 5 patients all met Romhilt-Estes6 criteria for LVH. Two patients had one or more episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during Holter monitoring.
Table 2106482. Clinical Characteristics and Electrocardiographic Features in Patients With Anderson-Fabry Disease
PatientAge,* yα-Gal, nmol · hr−1 · mL−1Chest PainNYHA ClassSyncopePalpitationsPR, msQRS, msRomhilt-Estes ScoreST-T ChangesNSVT
*Age at time of study.
AF indicates atrial fibrillation; +, positive; and −, negative. Other abbreviations as in Table 1.
1510.1+2++1521567++
2340.11++16015213+
3510.31+1241047+
4810.4+2+1441449++
5420.6+21929211+
6570.72+AFPacedPacedPaced
Figure 1. ECG showing LVH and repolarization changes in a patient with Anderson-Fabry disease.
The echocardiographic features in the patients with Anderson-Fabry disease are shown in Table 3. Maximum left ventricular wall thickness was 21±4 mm (range, 14–26 mm). Five had concentric hypertrophy (Figure 2), and one had asymmetric septal hypertrophy (patient 6). One patient had systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve and a left ventricular outflow tract gradient of 80 mm Hg (patient 4).
Table 3106482. Echocardiographic Features in Anderson-Fabry Patients
PatientLVWT, mmLA, mmLVED, mmLVES, mmPatternE Wave, m/sA Wave, m/sIVRT, msDeceleration Time, msFractional Shortening, %Valve Abnormalities
LVWT indicates maximum left ventricular wall thickness; LA, left atrium; LVED, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVES, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; AF, atrial fibrillation; IVRT, isovolumic relaxation time; MR, mitral regurgitation; and AR, aortic regurgitation.
121465033Concentric0.90.77215834Normal
224565230Concentric0.60.59021642Normal
320465327Concentric0.90.58123349Mild MR
426444731Concentric0.61.013014734Mild MR, AR
514344426Concentric0.70.78826441Mild MR
619474028Asymmetric1.0Paced/AF8419330Normal
Figure 2. Two-dimensional echocardiograph in the parasternal long-axis view demonstrating concentric LVH in a patient with Anderson-Fabry disease.

Genetic Analysis

Patients 1, 4, and 5 had the same missense mutation in exon 5 (an adenine to guanine transition at position 644, leading to the substitution of serine for asparagine at residue 215). Patient 2 had a novel thymidine-to-cytosine transition at position 950 in exon 6, resulting in the substitution of threonine for isoleucine at residue 317. Patient 6 had a guanine-to-thymidine transition at nucleotide 937 in exon 6 of the coding sequence, which predicted a substitution of tyrosine for aspartic acid at residue 313. Patient 3 had a novel single base pair deletion at position 1223, predicting a frameshift in the reading frame at amino acid 408 and premature termination of translation of the protein product.

Discussion

Clinical features of Anderson-Fabry disease usually appear in childhood and adolescence. As patients age, cardiovascular disease, including conduction abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, and stroke, become a major cause of morbidity.7 Several reports have suggested that some male hemizygotes remain asymptomatic for most of their adult life. In a study of 1603 men undergoing echocardiography, Nakao and colleagues2 identified 230 individuals with a left ventricular wall thickness of at least 13 mm, of whom 7 (3%) had α-Gal deficiency. Notably, 6 of the 7 were said to have unexplained hypertrophy. The wider significance of these findings was, however, uncertain because the prevalence of unexplained hypertrophy was unusually high (3% compared with estimates of between 1/500 and 1/1000 in most population studies).8

Comparison of Anderson-Fabry Disease and Familial HCM

Most patients with familial HCM have asymmetrical septal hypertrophy (ASH).3 In contrast, 5 of the 6 patients with low α-Gal activity in this study had concentric hypertrophy. These data are consistent with a recent study of 30 patients with Anderson-Fabry disease; 37% of these patients had concentric LVH, 10% had ASH, and 3% had an eccentric pattern of hypertrophy.9 In 25% of patients with familial HCM, ASH is associated with dynamic subaortic obstruction.10 In the present study, one patient with Anderson-Fabry disease had a typical outflow gradient in association with concentric hypertrophy.
Many electrocardiographic abnormalities have been described in Anderson-Fabry disease, including short PR intervals and prolonged QRS duration. Both are also described in familial HCM.11 With regard to arrhythmia, one patient with low α-Gal activity had permanent atrial fibrillation and 2 had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring. The prevalence and clinical significance of these arrhythmias in Anderson-Fabry disease cannot, however, be determined from the present study.

Clinical Implications

The present study demonstrates that, as a cause for HCM, Anderson-Fabry disease is at least as common as some sarcomeric protein gene mutations.1 It should be suspected in male patients with concentric hypertrophy and no family history of HCM or inheritance consistent with X-linked disease. Correct diagnosis is important because recent advances in the treatment of Anderson-Fabry disease may offer stabilization and reversal of some cardiovascular manifestations.12,13

Limitations

In view of the X-linked recessive inheritance of Anderson-Fabry disease, we only screened male patients. Although female heterozygotes can also present with cardiac involvement, biochemical diagnosis can be problematic because they often have intermediate levels of enzyme activity overlapping with those seen in normal controls.
The normal controls in this study were Japanese. Although this raises the possibility of ethnic differences, the α-Gal levels used to define Anderson-Fabry disease conform with those used in Western populations.

References

1.
Spirito P, Seidman CE, Mckenna WJ, et al. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 775–785.
2.
Nakao S, Takenaka T, Maeda M, et al. An atypical variant of Fabry’s disease in men with left ventricular hypertrophy. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 288–293.
3.
Maron BJ, Gottdiener JS, Epstein SE. Patterns and significance of distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a wide angle two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 125 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1981; 48: 418–428.
4.
Davies JP, Winchester BG, Malcolm S. Sequence variations in the first exon of alpha-galactosidase A. J Med Genet. 1993; 30: 658–663.
5.
Davies JP, Winchester BG, Malcolm S. Mutational analysis in patients with the typical form of Anderson-Fabry disease. Hum Mol Genet. 1993; 2: 1051–1053.
6.
Romhilt DW, Estes EH Jr. A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 1968; 75: 752–758.
7.
Desnick RJ, Ioannou YA, Eng CM. α-Galactosidase, a deficiency: Fabry disease. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, et al, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease. 7th ed. Vol 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995: 2741–2784.
8.
Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, et al. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults: echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Circulation. 1995; 92: 785–789.
9.
Linhart A, Palecek T, Bultas J, et al. New insights in cardiac structural changes in patients with Fabry’s disease. Am Heart J. 2000; 139: 1101–1108.
10.
Wigle ED, Sasson Z, Henderson MA, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the importance of the site and extent of hypertrophy: a review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985; 28: 1–83.
11.
Savage DD, Seides SF, Clark CE, et al. Electrocardiographic findings in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1978; 58: 402–409.
12.
Schiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin HA3rd, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285: 2743–2749.
13.
Eng CM, Guffon N, Wilcox WR, et al, for the International Collaborative Fabry Disease Study Group. Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A replacement therapy in Fabry’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 9–16.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation
Go to Circulation
Circulation
Pages: 1407 - 1411
PubMed: 11914245

History

Published online: 26 March 2002
Published in print: 26 March 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. Anderson-Fabry disease
  2. cardiomyopathy
  3. hypertrophy

Notes

Received December 18, 2001; revision received January 29, 2002; accepted January 29, 2002.

Authors

Affiliations

B. Sachdev, MRCP
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
T. Takenaka, MD PhD
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
H. Teraguchi, MD
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
C. Tei, MD PhD
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
P. Lee, MRCP MD, PhD
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
W.J. McKenna, MBBS FRCP, FESC
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).
P.M. Elliott, MBBS MD, MRCP
From the Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital Medical School, London, UK (B.S., W.J.M., P.M.E.); the First Department of Internal Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan (T.T., H.T., C.T.); and the Metabolic Unit, University College London Hospitals, London, UK (P.L.).

Notes

Correspondence to Dr P.M. Elliott, Department of Cardiological Sciences, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom. E-mail [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Fabry Cardiomyopathy: Myocardial Fibrosis, Inflammation, and Down‐Regulation of Mannose‐6‐Phosphate Receptors Cause Low Accessibility to Enzyme Replacement Therapy, Journal of the American Heart Association, 14, 4, (2025)./doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.036815
    Abstract
  2. Modelling Fabry disease with kidney organoids derived from human embryonic stem cells using CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing, Organoid, 4, (e2), (2024).https://doi.org/10.51335/organoid.2024.4.e2
    Crossref
  3. The Asian Fabry Cardiomyopathy High-Risk Screening Study 2 (ASIAN-FAME-2): Prevalence of Fabry Disease in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 13, (3896), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133896
    Crossref
  4. Anderson–Fabry Disease: Red Flags for Early Diagnosis of Cardiac Involvement, Diagnostics, 14, 2, (208), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020208
    Crossref
  5. Algorithm for Investigation of Fabry Disease in Cardiomyopathies, Journal of Inborn Errors of Metabolism and Screening, 12, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1590/2326-4594-jiems-2023-0014
    Crossref
  6. FDrisk: development of a validated risk assessment tool for Fabry disease utilizing electronic health record data, Journal of Rare Diseases, 3, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s44162-023-00026-7
    Crossref
  7. Genetic testing and counseling for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: An evidence‐based practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, Journal of Genetic Counseling, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1993
    Crossref
  8. Screening for Fabry disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy in China: A multicentre and prospective study, ESC Heart Failure, 11, 6, (4381-4389), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15065
    Crossref
  9. Elderly Brothers With Fabry Disease Exhibiting Cardiac and Renal Manifestations, Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases, 2, 5, (2023).https://doi.org/10.7326/aimcc.2022.1003
    Crossref
  10. Posicionamento do Departamento de Imagem Cardiovascular da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre o Uso do Strain Miocárdico na Rotina do Cardiologista – 2023, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 120, 9, (2023).https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230646
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Prevalence of Anderson-Fabry Disease in Male Patients With Late Onset Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation
  • Vol. 105
  • No. 12

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation
  • Vol. 105
  • No. 12
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response