Skip to main content
Review Article
Originally Published 20 August 2002
Free Access

Clinical and Pathophysiological Implications of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve

You are contacted by a concerned 34-year-old airline pilot with a leaky bicuspid aortic valve recently diagnosed by an echocardiogram that had been requested by his new employer as part of a routine medical assessment. He claims that he is perfectly healthy but is at risk of losing his job over his condition. He is concerned that his disease is hereditary and that his children may also be at risk. The patient, his attorney, and his insurance company have requested a statement from you as to the cause, possible complications, and treatment options associated with a congenital malformation of the aortic valve.
The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, occurring in 1% to 2% of the population. The majority of BAV patients develop complications requiring treatment. Physicians are often challenged when asked to provide evidence-based advice about BAV disease because the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of this disease are not well understood.

What Causes Bicuspid Aortic Valves?

BAVs are the result of abnormal aortic cusp formation during valvulogenesis. Adjacent cusps fuse to form a single aberrant cusp, larger than its counterpart yet smaller than 2 normal cusps combined. BAVs are likely the result of a complex developmental process, not simply the fusion of 2 normal cusps. In fact, congenital aortic valve malformations may reflect a phenotypic continuum of unicuspid valves (severe form), bicuspid valves (moderate form), tricuspid valves (normal), and the rare quadricuspid forms1 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. A, Normal tricuspid aortic valve. The cusps (arrowheads) and the 3 commissures (arrows) are clearly seen. Three sinuses of Valsalva are also seen. The cusps coapt normally to give a functionally normal valve. B, Congenitally bicuspid aortic valve, with one cusp larger (asterisk) than the other. The cusps show thickening due to fibrosis. Two commissures (arrows) are seen. One raphe (arrowhead) is seen. The raphe shows marked fibrosis and calcification. Both coronary arteries (open arrows) arose from the sinus of the cusp with the raphe. C, An aortic valve surgically excised from a 33-year-old male who had clinical evidence of aortic stenosis and insufficiency. The valve and proximal ascending aorta were excised and replaced with a composite graft (St Jude Medical 27-mm valve). The excised valve has the features of a congenitally unicommissural aortic valve with only 1 (cut) commissure (arrows). Flow surface appears on the left and nonflow surface on the right. The cusp tissue shows diffuse fibrosis, thickening, and multifocal nodular calcification. The nonflow surface shows 2 raphes (arrowheads). The resected aorta was dilated and showed significant medial change.
The pathogenesis of congenital aortic valve malformations is unknown. Proponents of environmental causes believe that abnormal blood flow through the aortic valve during valvulogenesis results in a failure of cusp separation. However, there is no convincing evidence to support this claim. A genetic cause of BAV disease is perhaps a more substantiated explanation, although it is not conclusive. In support of a genetic cause, BAV is highly associated with congenital abnormalities of the aorta (coarctation of the aorta and patent ductus arteriosis) and the proximal coronary vasculature. After development, BAV is associated with aortic dilation, aneurysms, and dissection (Figure 2). In light of this, the BAVs should be considered a disease of the entire aortic root.
Figure 2. Normal aortic root (A) and dilated aortic root (B) characteristic of patients with BAV.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an important role in providing both structural support as well the environmental cues necessary for normal tissue development and homeostasis. In fact, ECM proteins help to direct cell differentiation and cusp formation during valvulogenesis. Microfibrillar proteins act as scaffolding for embryonic cells and regulate tissue formation in the developing aortic valves. In fact, the differentiation of cushion mesenchymal cells into mature valve cells correlates with the expression of the microfibrillar proteins fibrillin and fibulin.2 Microfibrillar proteins within the aortic matrix may be deficient in patients with BAV. Inadequate production of fibrillin-1 during valvulogenesis may disrupt the formation of the aortic cusps, resulting in a bicuspid valve and a weakened aortic root. Our preliminary data support the hypothesis that microfibrillar proteins are deficient in adults with BAV disease, disrupting the structural support of the aortic root.
Defects in the genes that encode matrix elements have not yet been identified in patients with BAVs. Although the gene for fibrillin-1 may be structurally normal, transcriptional elements that control protein production may be defective. Transcriptional elements are emerging as important mediators of many other congenital cardiac defects.3 Abnormalities of the gene encoding endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is also an important candidate, because mice with eNOS deficiency have a high incidence of congenital BAV.4 Although a single “BAV gene” has yet to be identified, there is likely a heterogeneous mechanism of causation resulting in diverse clinical phenotypes. Advances in molecular biology will most certainly uncover the molecular and cellular mediators involved in this common disorder.

Are BAVs Hereditary?

It is not clear that BAVs are inheritable. Chan and associates5 determined the rate of familial occurrence of BAV with the use of echocardiography to screen family members of affected individuals. Of the 30 families screened, 11 families (36.7%) had >1 first-degree relative with BAV. The high incidence of familial clustering is compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance.5,6 Interestingly, males are affected 4:1. Echocardiographic screening of first-degree relatives is therefore warranted.

What Are the Risks of BAV?

BAV occurs in 1% to 2% of the population, compared with 0.8% for all other forms of congenital cardiac disease combined. Given that serious complications will develop in ≥33% of patients with BAV, the bicuspid valve may be responsible for more deaths and morbidity than the combined effects of all the other congenital heart defects.7 Although patients with BAV may go undetected or without clinical consequences for a lifetime, the vast majority will require some intervention, most often surgery. The important clinical consequences of BAV disease are valvular stenosis, regurgitation, infective endocarditis, and aortic complications such as dilation and dissection, as shown in the Table.
Bicuspid Aortic Valve
AI indicates aortic incompetence; AS, aortic stenosis.
Pathophysiology
    Valve complications
        • Stenosis
        • Regurgitation
        • Infection
    Vascular complications
        • Medial degeneration
        • Dilation/aneurysm
        • Dissection
Clinical implications
    Observation
        • Mild to moderate AI/AS
        • Normal LV dimensions
        • Normal LV function
        • Nondilated aorta
    Surgery
        • Severe AI/AS
        • Dilated aorta
        • Increased LV size
        • Decreased LV function

Valvular Complications

Aortic stenosis is the most frequent complication of BAV, in many cases requiring aortic valve replacement. Bicuspid valves are present in the majority of patients aged 15 to 65 years with significant aortic stenosis, reflecting the propensity for premature fibrosis, stiffening, and calcium deposition in these abnormally functioning valves (Figure 3). In fact, aortic stenosis associated with congenital aortic valve malformations is age dependent: The fewer the number of cusps, the greater is the chance that the valve is stenotic from birth. The anatomy of the bicuspid valve may also influence the propensity for obstruction: Stenosis is more rapid if the aortic cusps are asymmetrical or in the anteroposterior position.7 In addition, patients with poor lipid profiles and those who smoke are also at an elevated risk of developing hemodynamically significant bicuspid aortic stenosis.8 These are potentially modifiable risk factors amenable to treatment.
Figure 3. A through D, This aortic valve was excised surgically from a 71-year-old male, for aortic stenosis. He underwent a Bentall repair for the aortic stenosis. The aortic valve was received in 2 pieces with one piece (one cusp) larger than the other. The larger piece has a central indentation and raphe (arrowheads) and the configuration of a “bird’s wings in flight.” Extensive (virtually diffuse) fibrosis and nodular calcification of the cusps is seen, consistent with clinically significant aortic stenosis. The smooth but nodular flow surface (A) and the more nodular nonflow surface or sinus surface (B) are shown. The raphe and adjacent tissue show extensive thickening and calcification. A transverse section through the region of the raphe shows marked fibrosis (C). The outer or sinus end of the raphe also shows mild cellular proliferation (arrow), likely related to hemodynamic changes. The elastic lamina (arrowhead) runs from one end to the other. A histological section of a cusp shows marked calcification (asterisk) with destruction of cusp layers and a marked thickening of the cusp (D). The latter would correspond to cusp stiffening.
Aortic regurgitation occurs in the presence of a BAV usually from cusp prolapse, fibrotic retraction, or dilation of the sinotubular junction. Isolated regurgitation usually occurs in younger patients,9 as in the case presented above, and may reflect a subset of patients more prone to aortic complications. Endocarditis is a potentially devastating complication that occurs in ≈30% of patients with BAV, particularly with regurgitant valves and in younger patients.

Vascular Complications

The vascular complications of BAV disease are less understood and cause significant morbidity and mortality. The presence of a BAV is an independent risk factor for progressive aortic dilation, aneurysm formation, and dissection. Despite considerable controversy, it is believed that the vascular complications of BAV disease are not secondary to valvular dysfunction10,11 and can manifest in young adults without significant aortic stenosis or regurgitation and in patients in whom the native BAV was replaced by a prosthesis. In fact, ≥50% of young patients with normally functioning BAVs have echocardiographic evidence of aortic dilation.11 Aortic dilation is believed to be a precursor to aortic rupture and dissection, both potentially fatal events.
BAV is associated with accelerated degeneration of the aortic media, indicating that BAV disease is an ongoing pathological process, not a discrete developmental event. We and others12–16 have identified focal abnormalities within the aortic media of patients with BAV, such as matrix disruption and smooth muscle cell loss, suggesting a degenerative process that may result in structural weakness of the aortic wall. These lesions are similar in fibrillin-1–deficient aorta17,18 and patients with Marfan Syndrome,16 who also suffer from abnormal fibrillin-1 content. A loss of fibrillin-1 microfibrils may dissociate smooth muscle cells from medial matrix components, resulting in accelerated cell death and matrix disruption (Figure 4). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), endogenous enzymes that degrade matrix components, have been implicated in atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm formation.19 MMPs become activated in fibrillin-1–deficient tissues,17,18,20 degrading the structural support of the aorta and resulting in dilation, aneurysms, and dissection. Our preliminary data suggest that MMP activity may be elevated in the aorta of patients with BAV. Understanding the pathophysiology of the aortic complications associated with BAV may facilitate the discovery of underlying gene defects and possible therapeutic targets and strategies to prevent these life-threatening complications.
Figure 4. The elastic laminae of the aortic media provides structural support and elasticity to the aorta. In normal tricuspid valve patients (A), fibrillin-1 microfibrils tether smooth muscle cells to adjacent elastin and collagen matrix components. In patients with BAV (B), deficient microfibrillar elements result in smooth muscle cell detachment, MMP release, matrix disruption, cell death, and a loss of structural support and elasticity.

How Should BAV Disease Be Treated?

Serial assessment of the aortic valve by echocardiography is a valuable tool to evaluate the functional state of the valve as well as to measure the aortic diameter, chamber dimensions, and ventricular function.21 However, echocardiographic identification of a BAV can be obscured in severe stenosis and after cuspal fusion secondary to inflammation. A definitive diagnosis of congenital BAV can only be made by histological examination after valve excision.
In general, patients with mild-to-moderate valvular dysfunction and normal left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function should be monitored by echocardiography at regular intervals. Aortic valve replacement is indicated for severe valvular dysfunction, symptomatic patients, and/or those patients with evidence of abnormal LV dimensions and function (Table). Because many of these patients will require cardiac surgery during their lifetime, early referral to a surgeon with experience in aortic valve surgery is recommended. Patients with isolated aortic regurgitation may be candidates for aortic valve repair, an intervention that obviates the need for long-term anticoagulation.22 Early referral before significant deterioration of the cusps may increase the chance for a successful valve repair. Use of the pulmonary autograft (Ross procedure) for aortic valve replacement has been advocated as an important alternative to prosthetic valve implantation, particularly in younger patients. Underlying medial abnormalities in patients with BAV may predispose to postoperative autograft dilatation23 because the pulmonary artery has the same embryological origin as the aorta and undergoes similar degenerative changes13 (Figure 5).
Figure 5. The healthy aorta of a patient with a tricuspid aortic valve (A and B) has a highly organized media of smooth muscle cells (stained red, white arrow), elastic plates (stained black), and collagen (stained yellow). In patients with BAV malformations (C and D), the aorta shows significant changes. Loss of smooth muscle and fibrosis (open arrows) causes collapse of the elastic plates (arrows). Mucopolysaccharides (stained greenish blue) and disarray of the elastic plates (double arrow) are evident in the media. L indicates lumen. Stain: Movat pentachrome. Original magnification: A and C, ×5; B and D, ×10.
Aortic dilation should be carefully monitored by echocardiography21 and aortic root replacement recommended more aggressively for patients with BAV24 with aortic dilation (ie, 4 to 5 cm) than for those of patients with tricuspid valve (ie, 5 to 6 cm). Combined aortic valve repair with a valve-sparing root replacement can be performed successfully in young patients with aortic regurgitation and aortic dilation. The benefit of β-blockers to prevent aortic dilation in BAV disease is not clear; however, hypertension should be carefully monitored and controlled. The role of MMP inhibitors and gene or protein therapy to augment deficient extracellular matrix components in the bicuspid aorta is an exciting prospect that warrants further investigation.

Conclusions

You explain to the concerned pilot that: (1) The BAV is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality and may result from defects in genes that encode matrix elements; (2) BAV malformations are inherited, particularly in males, and echocardiographic screening of his children is appropriate; (3) the BAV is a disease of the entire aortic root and has a propensity for both valvular and aortic complications, often requiring surgery; (4) endocarditis is a devastating complication that can be prevented by antibiotic prophylaxis; (5) early referral to a cardiac surgeon can facilitate a plan for surgery that may prevent life-threatening complications. After reviewing his echocardiogram in detail, you note that his aortic regurgitation is mild, LV dimensions and functions are normal, and aortic root diameter is within normal limits. You reassure him that surgery is not yet required, but regular follow-up and antibiotic prophylaxis are recommended. The patient agrees to consult a cardiac surgeon for more information about the future need for surgery and the possibility of valve repair.

Footnote

Dr Fedak is a Research Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC).

References

1.
Fernandez MC, Duran AC, Real R, et al. Coronary artery anomalies and aortic valve morphology in the Syrian hamster. Lab Anim. 2000; 34: 145–154.
2.
Eisenberg LM, Markwald RR. Molecular regulation of atrioventricular valvuloseptal morphogenesis. Circ Res. 1995; 77: 1–6.
3.
Epstein JA, Buck CA. Transcriptional regulation of cardiac development: implications for congenital heart disease and DiGeorge syndrome. Pediatr Res. 2000; 48: 717–724.
4.
Lee TC, Zhao YD, Courtman DW, et al. Abnormal aortic valve development in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2345–2348.
5.
Huntington K, Hunter AG, Chan KL. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 1809–1812.
6.
Clementi M, Notari L, Borghi A, et al. Familial congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a disorder of uncertain inheritance. Am J Med Genet. 1996; 62: 336–338.
7.
Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart. 2000; 83: 81–85.
8.
Chan KL, Ghani M, Woodend K, et al. Case-controlled study to assess risk factors for aortic stenosis in congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 690–693.
9.
Pachulski RT, Chan KL. Progression of aortic valve dysfunction in 51 adult patients with congenital bicuspid aortic valve: assessment and follow up by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J. 1993; 69: 237–240.
10.
Keane MG, Wiegers SE, Plappert T, et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation. 2000; 102: III35-III39.
11.
Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, et al. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart. 1999; 82: 19–22.
12.
Braverman AC. Bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortic wall abnormalities. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1996; 11: 501–503.
13.
de Sa M, Moshkovitz Y, Butany J, et al. Histologic abnormalities of the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: clinical relevance to the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 118: 588–594.
14.
Parai JL, Masters RG, Walley VM, et al. Aortic medial changes associated with bicuspid aortic valve: myth or reality? Can J Cardiol. 1999; 15: 1233–1238.
15.
Veinot JP. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valve and associated aortic medical disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 1067–1068.
16.
Niwa K, Perloff JK, Bhuta SM, et al. Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation. 2001; 103: 393–400.
17.
Bunton TE, Biery NJ, Myers L, et al. Phenotypic alteration of vascular smooth muscle cells precedes elastolysis in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 37–43.
18.
Pereira L, Lee SY, Gayraud B, et al. Pathogenetic sequence for aneurysm revealed in mice underexpressing fibrillin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 3819–3823.
19.
Thompson RW, Parks WC. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996; 800: 157–174.
20.
Fleischer KJ, Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ, et al. Immunohistochemical abnormalities of fibrillin in cardiovascular tissues in Marfan’s syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 63: 1012–1017.
21.
Burks JM, Illes RW, Keating EC, et al. Ascending aortic aneurysm and dissection in young adults with bicuspid aortic valve: implications for echocardiographic surveillance. Clin Cardiol. 1998; 21: 439–443.
22.
Rao V, Van Arsdell GS, David TE, et al. Aortic valve repair for adult congenital heart disease: A 22-year experience. Circulation. 2000; 102: III40-III43.
23.
David TE, Omran A, Ivanov J, et al. Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119: 210–220.
24.
Ergin MA, Spielvogel D, Apaydin A, et al. Surgical treatment of the dilated ascending aorta: when and how? Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 67: 1834–1839.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation
Go to Circulation
Circulation
Pages: 900 - 904
PubMed: 12186790

History

Published online: 20 August 2002
Published in print: 20 August 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paul W.M. Fedak, MD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Subodh Verma, MD, PhD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tirone E. David, MD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard L. Leask, PhD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard D. Weisel, MD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jagdish Butany, MD
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery (P.W.M.F., S.V., T.E.D., R.D.W.) and Department of Pathology (R.L.L., J.B.), University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Notes

Correspondence to Jagdish Butany, MBBS, MS, FRCPC, Professor, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Department of Pathology, Toronto General Hospital, E4-322, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. E-mail [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and in silico models, Progress in Materials Science, 150, (101363), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363
    Crossref
  2. Double Negative Is Positive: Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Left Coronary Artery Saved by a Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61136
    Crossref
  3. Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Current Therapeutic Strategies, Aortic Valve Disease - Recent Advances, (2024).https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113315
    Crossref
  4. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 17, (4970), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13174970
    Crossref
  5. Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) Diagnosed with ECG-Gated Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography—Analysis of the Reasons for Referral, Classification of Morphological Phenotypes, Co-Occurring Cardiovascular Abnormalities, and Coronary Artery Stenosis, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 13, (3790), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133790
    Crossref
  6. Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Young Adults for Cardiologists and Cardiac Surgeons: State-of-the-Art of Literature Review, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11, 10, (317), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11100317
    Crossref
  7. Unique Features of Cardiovascular Involvement and Progression in Children with Marfan Syndrome Justify Dedicated Multidisciplinary Care, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11, 4, (114), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11040114
    Crossref
  8. Aortic Valve Repair with External Annuloplasty in Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Patients, Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11, 1, (17), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11010017
    Crossref
  9. Rationale and design of the SPREAD study: Sport Practice and its Effects on Aortic Size and Valve Function in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 64, 10, (2024).https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16051-3
    Crossref
  10. Later aorta operation after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 19, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02638-6
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Clinical and Pathophysiological Implications of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Circulation
  • Vol. 106
  • No. 8

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation
  • Vol. 106
  • No. 8
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response