Skip main navigation
×

Vascular Endothelin-B Receptor System In Vivo Plays a Favorable Inhibitory Role in Vascular Remodeling After Injury Revealed by Endothelin-B Receptor–Knockout Mice

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000032004.56585.2ACirculation. 2002;106:1991–1998

Abstract

Background— Two subtypes of endothelin (ET) receptors, ETA and ETB, are distributed in vascular smooth muscle cells to cause contraction and proliferation. Vascular endothelial cells express only ETB receptors, which cause NO release. Although ETA receptor blockade is reported to be effective in ameliorating vascular remodeling, there is no report on the long-term effect of ETB receptor blockade on vascular remodeling after injury.

Methods and Results— ETB receptor–knockout (KO) mice, which were genetically rescued from lethal intestinal aganglionosis, and wild-type (WT) mice underwent complete ligation of the right common carotid artery, ie, a blood flow cessation model of vascular remodeling. Fourteen days after ligation, the intimal area, the ratio of intimal to medial areas, and the stenotic ratio in the ligated artery of KO mice were significantly increased compared with those of WT mice. The expression level of ET-1 mRNA in the ligated artery of KO mice was increased similarly to that of WT mice, whereas tissue NOx levels in lesions of KO mice were significantly lower than those of WT mice. Long-term treatment with the ETA receptor antagonist TA-0201 (0.5 mg · kg−1 · d−1) significantly ameliorated vascular stenosis in both groups. Long-term treatment with the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (30 mg · kg−1 · d−1) worsened vascular remodeling in WT mice.

Conclusions— We demonstrated that inhibition of the ETB receptor system is harmful for vascular remodeling after injury, the mechanism of which is partly attributed to decreased NO release, in KO mice. These results suggest that the overall effect of vascular ETB receptors is antiproliferative in the injured artery.

Endothelin (ET)-1, a vasoconstrictor peptide produced by endothelial cells,1 acts by binding to its 2 subtypes of receptors, endothelin type A (ETA) and type B (ETB) receptors.2 In the vessels, ETA receptors are located primarily on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) to induce vasoconstriction and cell proliferation.2 ETB receptors are expressed not only on vascular endothelial cells but also on VSMCs.3 Endothelial ETB receptors activate the release of endothelium-derived relaxation factors, such as NO,4 a potent vasodilator with an antiproliferative action on VSMCs, whereas the ETB receptors on VSMCs induce vasoconstriction and proliferation of VSMCs.3 In animal models with vascular disease, such as restenosis after balloon injury, selective ETA receptor antagonists and ETA/B dual receptor antagonists are reported to effectively inhibit VSMC proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia.5–8 Therefore, ETA receptor antagonism is expected to be an important therapeutic target for vascular diseases. However, the long-term effect of selective blockade of ETB receptors on vascular diseases has not been reported. Analysis of the effects of ETB receptor blockade on vascular diseases is important in further understanding the pathophysiological role of the ET system in vascular diseases and in determining whether a selective ETA receptor antagonist or an ETA/B dual receptor antagonist is more favorable for the treatment of vascular remodeling.

The purpose of this study was to reveal how the ET-1–ETB receptor system is involved in vascular remodeling after injury in vivo. To obtain direct evidence concerning the pathophysiological role of the ETB receptor, we used endogenous ETB receptor–knockout (KO) mice. Because targeted disruption or naturally occurring mutations of the mouse ETB receptor gene result in a white-spotted coat and aganglionic megacolon, the latter leading to juvenile death, 9,10 the mice received a tissue-specific ETB receptor transgene driven by the human dopamine β-hydroxylase (DβH) gene promoter.11–13 Thus, the “rescued” KO mice lack functional ETB receptors in their vessels but exhibit normal enteric development because of adrenergic tissue-specific ETB receptor expression by the transgene and survive into adulthood.11–13

Recently, a murine model of vascular remodeling produced by complete ligation of the carotid artery, ie, a blood flow cessation model, was described.14,15 This has been widely accepted as a useful model characterized by vascular remodeling and proliferative VSMC-dominant intimal hyperplasia induced by cessation of blood flow in the carotid artery. We performed complete ligation of the right common carotid artery in both KO and wild-type (WT) mice and investigated the pathophysiological role of ETB receptors in vascular remodeling in comparison between KO and WT mice.

Methods

Mice

The generation of heterozygous ETB receptor–knockout mice (ETB+/−) on a C57BL/6J genetic background was described previously.9,10 We generated the human DβH gene promoter–regulated ETB receptor transgene (DβH-ETB) and ETB+/− with DβH-ETB as described previously.11–13 As a result of crossing between ETB+/− with DβH-ETB, we obtained 3 genotypes: ETB+/+ with DβH-ETB (WT), ETB+/− with DβH-ETB (heterozygous KO mice), and ETB−/− with DβH-ETB (KO mice). KO mice exhibit a white coat that distinguished them from heterozygous KO and WT mice. We distinguished WT from heterozygous KO mice by genomic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for a targeted allele. PCR was performed on DNA isolated from tail biopsy specimens as described previously.11,16

Blood Pressure Measurements and Biochemical Assays

We measured blood pressure with a programmable sphygmomanometer using the tail-cuff method as described in our previous article.17 To investigate the effect of a low-salt diet on blood pressure, WT and KO mice were each divided into 2 groups. One group was given a standard diet (0.24% sodium), and the other was given a low-salt diet (0.0046% sodium). The average blood pressure from 5 independent readings was obtained.

Blood samples were collected, and blood glucose was immediately measured. Plasma concentrations of total cholesterol, angiotensin II, arginine vasopressin, and norepinephrine were measured as described in our previous articles.18,19

Carotid Artery Ligation

We performed complete ligation of the right common carotid artery of mice, as described in previous articles.14,15 In brief, 18- to 20-week-old male mice were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg IP), and a cervical incision was performed. The right common carotid artery and its bifurcation into the external and internal carotid arteries were exposed, and the common carotid artery was ligated near the bifurcation. The left common carotid artery was only exposed as a control.

Treatment With Selective ETA or ETB Receptor Antagonist

We administered the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 orally (30 mg · kg− 1 · d−1) to WT mice from 2 days before operation. Furthermore, the ETA receptor antagonist TA-0201 (0.5 mg · kg−1 · d−1) was infused continuously by an osmotic minipump (model 2004, Alza Co) implanted subcutaneously in each WT and KO mouse from 2 days before operation.

Morphometric Analysis

The bilateral carotid arteries excised 14 days after operation were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. A total of 20 transverse sections per animal were cut at 200-μm intervals from the bifurcation to the proximal end and stained with hematoxylin-eosin or Masson’s trichrome. We assessed the right carotid artery morphometrically at the position displaying the smallest lumen and the left carotid artery at the contralateral position as the control side. The borders of the internal lumen, internal elastic lamina (IEL), and external elastic lamina (EEL) were traced on a digitizing board with Apple Macintosh commercial software, Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe Inc). The luminal area, IEL area, and EEL area were measured with Macintosh image analyzing software, NIH Image version 1.61. The intimal area was calculated by subtracting the luminal area from the IEL area, and the medial area was calculated by subtracting the IEL area from the EEL area. The vessel size was defined by EEL area. The ratio of intimal to medial area (I/M ratio) was calculated by dividing intimal area by medial area. The stenotic ratio was calculated by dividing intimal area by IEL area. Average values were obtained from morphometric analysis of each section of 5 to 11 animals per group.

Quantification of mRNA Levels by Reverse Transcription–PCR

RNA isolation and RT-PCR were performed as in our previous studies.16 The gene specific primers were as follows: ET-1 (sense): 5′ -GCTGTTCGTGACTTTCCA-3′; ET-1 (antisense): 5′ -GTGGCAGAAGTAGACACA-3′; β-actin (sense): 5′ -GAAGA-TCCTGACCGAGCGTA-3′; β-actin (antisense): 5′ -CGTACTC-CTGCTTGCTGATCC-3′.

The PCR protocol for ET-1 was as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by 38 cycles of 15 seconds of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 58°C for 20 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 45 seconds. The PCR protocol for β-actin was as follows: 22 cycles of 15 seconds of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 64°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 45 seconds.

Measurement of Tissue NOx Level

NOx (NO2 and NO3) level in plasma or artery was measured as described in our previous article, with minor modification.20 The method was based on the Griess reaction.21

Data Analysis

Data are given as mean±SEM. All statistical comparisons were performed by use of a commercially available statistical package for Apple Macintosh computer (StatView, version 4.5, Abacus Concepts, Inc). For multiple comparisons, results were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s post hoc test. For comparisons between 2 values, unpaired Student’s t test or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used when appropriate. Differences were considered significant at a value of P< 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of KO Mice

First, we confirmed the genotypes of WT and homozygous KO mice with an introduced tissue-specific ETB receptor transgene. As shown in Figure 1, the DβH-gene promoter–flanking ETB receptor transgene was documented in both WT and KO mice, whereas endogenous ETB receptor gene was detected only in WT mice. The targeted allele was specifically detected in KO mice.

Figure 1. Structure of human DβH gene promoter–flanking ETB receptor transgene and differentiation of phenotypes by genomic PCR. a, A 5.8-kb fragment from upstream regulatory sequence of human DβH gene fused to first intron of rat insulin gene was linked to a 1.9-kb fragment containing ETB receptor cDNA. rli indicates first intron of rat insulin gene; mPrm1, 3′-untranslated sequences of mouse protamine gene. b, Left, Products amplified by genomic PCR using primers that detect second and third exons of ETB receptor. Transgenic ETB receptor cDNA was documented in both WT and KO mice (solid arrow), whereas endogenous ETB receptor gene was detected only in WT mice (open arrow). Right, Targeted allele was specifically documented in KO mice by genomic PCR by use of a pair of neomycin-resistant gene–specific and ETB receptor gene–specific primers.

We measured blood pressure in both WT and KO mice from 14 to 16 weeks of age. We found that systolic blood pressure was significantly elevated in KO mice compared with WT mice at 14 weeks old (122.9±1.6 versus 113.6±3.3 mm Hg, P<0.05; KO, n=16; WT, n=22). The elevated blood pressure of KO mice was significantly decreased by 2-week treatment with a low-salt diet compared with that of KO mice with a standard diet (118.3±1.3 versus 125.6±1.9 mm Hg, P< 0.05, both n=8). Blood pressure of WT mice did not respond to the low-salt diet (WT with low-salt diet, 115.9±2.1 mm Hg versus WT with standard diet, 116.6±1.9 mm Hg, both n= 11). Therefore, it is suggested that KO mice develop salt-sensitive hypertension. We performed the following experiments using WT and KO mice fed a low-salt diet under normal blood pressure, because high blood pressure is a major factor affecting vascular remodeling.

Vascular Remodeling in Blood Flow Cessation Model

At 14 days after ligated operation, each parameter of body weight, systolic blood pressure, blood glucose, and plasma total cholesterol level was not significantly different between WT and KO mice treated with a low-salt diet (Table 1). Circulating levels of angiotensin II, arginine vasopressin, and norepinephrine were also not significantly different between the 2 groups (Table 1). It was suggested that the physiological and biochemical parameters affecting vascular remodeling were almost comparable in the 2 groups.

TABLE 1. Characteristics of KO Mice Treated With Low-Salt Diet 14 Days After Ligation of Carotid Artery

WT With Low-Salt Diet (n=7)KO With Low-Salt Diet (n=7)P
Values are mean ± SEM.
Body weight, g24.8±1.323.4±2.00.56
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg113.0±3.6116.9±4.20.49
Blood sugar (glucose), mg/dL142.9±5.2143.3±4.20.95
Plasma total cholesterol, mg/dL63.6±3.970.1±4.70.31
Angiotensin II, pg/mL262.4±143.468.5±9.50.17
Arginine vasopressin, pg/mL56.5±16.321.1±7.10.07
Norepinephrine, pg/mL692.3±336.81849.3±1179.00.36

In the nonligated (control) artery, intimal thickening was not observed in either WT or KO mice, and the vessel size, luminal area, and medial thickness were not significantly different between WT and KO mice (Figure 2, a and b; Figure 3, a and b). In contrast, the ligated artery exhibited luminal narrowing, which was primarily a result of neointimal hyperplasia and medial thickening, in both WT and KO mice (Figure 2, d and e; Figure 3, c and d). The maximal stenotic lesion was observed 1.23±0.27 mm (WT, n=7; KO, n=7) proximal to the bifurcation in the ligated artery. The extent of each neointimal hyperplasia or vascular stenosis was more greatly enhanced in KO than in WT mice. Furthermore, long-term treatment with the ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (30 mg · kg−1 · d−1 for 16 days) increased neointimal formation and decreased luminal area in the ligated artery of WT mice to almost same extent as those in KO mice (Figure 2, e and f). This indicates that the findings obtained from genetic inhibition of ETB receptors in KO mice are reproduced in the ligated artery in mice treated pharmacologically with an ETB receptor antagonist.

Figure 2. Photomicrographs showing representative cross-sectional areas in carotid arteries of WT, KO, and WT mice treated with selective ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (WT+A-192621). a, Nonligated artery of WT; b, nonligated artery of KO; c, nonligated artery of WT + A-192621; d, ligated artery of WT; e, ligated artery of KO; and f, ligated artery of WT + A-192621. a, b, and c show no morphological changes; d, e, and f show neointimal formation, medial thickening, and vascular stenosis 14 days after complete ligation of carotid artery. Neointimal hyperplasia and vascular stenosis in ligated artery of KO (e) and WT + A-192621 (f) were observed to a greater degree than in WT (d). a to f, Hematoxylin-eosin; magnification ×200; bar=200 μm.

Figure 3. High-power images showing representative cross-sectional areas in carotid arteries of WT and KO mice. a, Nonligated artery of WT; b, nonligated artery of KO; c, ligated artery of WT; d, ligated artery of KO. In a and b, intimal thickening was not observed, and medial thickness did not significantly differ between WT and KO mice. c and d show marked neointimal formation in both mice, which was greatly enhanced in KO mice. Medial thickening was comparable in WT and KO mice. a to d, Masson’s trichrome; magnification × 400.

Morphometric analysis of the ligated artery revealed that the intimal area (Figure 4a) and the I/M ratio (Figure 4c) were significantly increased in KO mice compared with those in WT mice. These were also increased in WT mice treated with A-192621 to almost same extent as in KO mice, but the differences were not statistically significant. The medial area was comparable in WT, KO, and A-192621–treated WT mice (Figure 4b). The stenotic ratio (Figure 4d) was significantly increased in KO and WT mice treated with A-192621 compared with that in WT mice. Various calculated values are summarized in Table 2. These findings indicate that neointimal hyperplasia and vascular stenosis were accelerated by the inhibition of ETB receptors independent of blood pressure.

Figure 4. Morphometric analysis of nonligated and ligated arteries of WT, KO, and WT treated with selective ETB receptor antagonist A-192621 (WT + A-192621). a, Intimal area; b, medial area; c, ratio of intimal to medial area; d, stenotic ratio (n=11 for WT, n=8 for KO, n=5 for WT + A-192621). *P<0.05 vs nonligated artery of WT, †P<0.05 vs nonligated artery of KO, #P<0.05 vs ligated artery of WT.

TABLE 2. Summary of Morphometric Analysis

WT (n=11)KO (n=8)WT+ETB Antagonist (n=5)
NonligatedLigatedNonligatedLigatedNonligatedLigated
Values are mean ± SEM.
Nonligated indicates nonligated carotid artery; ligated, ligated carotid artery.
*P<0.05 vs nonligated artery of WT;
P<0.05 vs ligated artery of WT.
Vessel size, μm271 339.84±6964.271 689.5±4568.569 935.0±7424.877 760.2±8390.656 357.8±2556.382 084.5±8583.9
Lumen size, μm246 700.1±7088.115 685.5±1991.3*46 948.6±8311.86502.9±1817.1*32 595.5±3438.16543.6±1016.9*
Intimal area, μm21867.6±226.120 456.0±4040.0*1856.5±227.537 215.5±5877.7*1773.1±152.836 816.5±7330.7*
Medial area, μm222 772.2±948.635 548.0±1808.3*21 129.8±1514.034 041.8±2276.8*21 989.2±1580.038 724.3±2049.5*
I/M ratio, μm2/μm20.08±0.010.60±0.13*0.09±0.011.08±0.14*0.08±0.010.94±0.19*
Stenotic ratio, %4.4±0.753.9±6.4*4.5±0.784.6±3.0*5.5±1.081.2±6.0*

Expression Level of ET-1 mRNA and NOx Level in Carotid Artery

Seven days after ligation, the gene expression level of ET-1 mRNA was greatly increased in the ligated artery compared with that in the nonligated artery (Figure 5a). However, the expression level of ET-1 mRNA in the ligated artery of KO mice was comparable to that of WT mice.

Figure 5. ET-1 mRNA expression and NOx level in carotid arteries of WT and KO mice at 7 days after ligation. a, Expression level of ET-1 mRNA was upregulated comparably in ligated arteries of WT and KO mice. Expression level of β-actin mRNA was used as an internal control. b, Plasma NOx level did not differ significantly between WT and KO mice (n=7 in WT, n=6 in KO). c, Tissue NOx level in ligated carotid artery of KO mice was significantly decreased compared with that of WT mice. *P< 0.05 vs ligated artery of WT mice (n=8 in each group).

Then, we measured the NOx level in plasma and the artery. Plasma NOx level was slightly, but not significantly, lower in KO than in WT mice (19.9±3.4 versus 25.1±3.9 μmol/L; WT, n=7; KO, n=6) (Figure 5b). However, tissue NOx level in the ligated artery of KO mice was significantly lower than that of WT mice (168.8±21.2 versus 268.4±40.6 nmol/g tissue, P<0.05, both n=8) (Figure 5c). These results indicate that the gene expression of ET-1 mRNA was increased similarly in the ligated arteries of both mice, whereas the tissue NOx level was significantly decreased in the ligated artery of KO mice.

Effect of Long-Term Treatment With Selective ETA Receptor Antagonist on Vascular Remodeling

To study the influence of the ETA receptor system, we administered TA-0201 (0.5 mg · kg−1 · d− 1) to KO and WT mice from 2 days before ligation. Body weight, blood pressure, and other biochemical data were not significantly different between WT and KO mice (data not shown). As shown in Figure 6, treatment with TA-0201 for 16 days markedly inhibited luminal narrowing and neointimal formation in each group. Medial area and vessel size of the ligated arteries in both mice were not affected by treatment. Morphometric analysis revealed that the stenotic ratio of WT mice treated with TA-0201 was significantly lower than that of KO mice treated with TA-0201 (25.1±6.7% versus 50.1±7.4%, P<0.05, both n=6) (Figure 6e). Intimal area and I/M ratio were lower in WT mice treated with TA-0201 than in KO mice treated with TA-0201, but the differences were not statistically significant (intimal area, 9954.9±3234.0 versus 17,585.4±2892.0 μm2, both n=6) (I/M ratio, 0.27±0.08 versus 0.49±0.07, both n=6). No significant difference was observed in the medial area between TA-0201–treated groups (medial area, 34,564.9±2159.1 μm2 in WT+TA versus 36,170.5±2902.6 μm2 in KO+ TA, both n=6).

Figure 6. Effect of long-term treatment with TA-0201, a selective ETA receptor antagonist, on vascular remodeling. Photomicrographs showing representative cross-sectional areas of ligated carotid arteries of WT and KO mice with or without treatment (a through d). a, Ligated artery of WT mice without TA-0201 treatment (WT ligated); b, ligated artery of KO mice without TA-0201 treatment (KO ligated); c, ligated artery of WT mice with TA-0201 treatment (WT ligated + TA); d, ligated artery of KO mice with TA-0201 treatment (KO ligated +TA). Marked neointimal formation and vascular stenosis were enhanced in KO (b) compared with WT (a) mice. Long-term treatment with a selective ETA receptor antagonist attenuated neointimal hyperplasia and vascular stenosis more effectively in WT (c) than in KO (d) mice. Hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification ×200; bar=200 μm. e, Stenotic ratio in ligated artery of WT mice was significantly decreased by TA-0201 compared with that of KO mice (n=11 for WT ligated, n=8 for KO ligated, n=6 for WT ligated + TA, n=6 for KO ligated + TA.) *P<0.05 vs WT ligated, † P<0.05 vs KO ligated, #P<0.05 vs WT ligated +TA.

Discussion

Previous studies reported that the ET-1 expression is increased in restenotic lesions after balloon injury and in atherosclerosis.22–24 Moreover, previous observations using pharmacological reagents suggested that the ETA receptor system contributes to vasoconstriction2 and the development of vascular diseases.5–8 However, there has been little information concerning the pathophysiological role of ETB receptors in vivo. The present study showed that vascular remodeling with neointimal formation was accelerated in the proximal carotid artery after ligation in rescued KO mice. We also demonstrated that long-term treatment with a selective ETB receptor antagonist, A-192621, in WT mice aggravated vascular stenosis to almost same extent as in KO mice, suggesting that the enhancement of vascular remodeling by inhibition of the ETB receptor system is a response seen not only in gene-manipulated mice but also in pharmacologically treated mice. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the gene expression of ET-1 mRNA was similarly increased, whereas the tissue NOx level was significantly decreased, in the ligated artery of KO mice. Our observations revealed that inactivation of the ETB receptor system leads to accelerated neointimal formation and vascular stenosis with a significant decrease in NO production in the injured artery.

In this study, we have demonstrated that inactivation of vascular ETB receptors accelerates pathological vascular remodeling in which gene expression of ET-1 mRNA was comparably increased, whereas tissue NOx level was significantly decreased, compared with that of WT mice. Previous studies reported that the gene expression of ET-1 and endothelial NO synthase was reciprocally regulated by flow or shear stress in cultured endothelial cells.25,26 Therefore, our observations suggest that decreased blood flow initially induces an increase in ET-1 expression and a decrease in NO production, resulting in an imbalance between ET-1 and NO levels in lesions. Furthermore, it is also suggested that failure of ETB receptor–mediated NO release in KO mice causes a significant decrease in tissue NOx level and consequently leads to pathological aggravation in KO mice. Our suggestion is supported by a previous study showing that endothelial NO synthase–deficient mice display abnormal vascular remodeling after vascular ligation.27 Therefore, it is suggested that inactivation of ETB receptor–mediated NO release is an important mechanism responsible for the pathological phenotype in KO mice.

In addition to the reduction of the vascular tissue NOx level in KO mice, other possible mechanisms underlying the enhancement of vascular remodeling in KO mice are considered. Neointimal formation is associated with balances between smooth muscle cell growth and cell death. It has been reported that ETB receptors promote stretch-induced apoptosis in cultured VSMCs.28 Therefore, a loss of ETB receptor– mediated apoptosis of VSMCs may contribute to the aggravated neointimal hyperplasia in KO mice. Alternatively, the following consideration is also possible. The ETB receptor system has also been reported to activate the release of other endothelium-derived relaxation factors, such as prostacyclin. Thus, a decrease in release of other endothelium-derived relaxation factors as well as NO may be involved in the enhancement of vascular remodeling in KO mice.

Clinical Implications and Study Limitations

In the clinical field, ET receptor antagonists are potential drugs for the treatment of vascular disease. However, it remains unclear whether a selective ETA receptor antagonist or an ETA/B dual receptor antagonist is more favorable for the treatment of vascular remodeling. Our results suggest that in the case of long-term administration of a selective ETB receptor antagonist, we should consider the unfavorable effects on vascular remodeling. Moreover, from our results, it seems likely that selective ETA receptor antagonists are superior to ETA/B dual receptor antagonists in their therapeutic effect on vascular remodeling. A previous study reported that long-term treatment with a selective ETA receptor antagonist restored NO–mediated endothelial function and inhibited atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice.29 Moreover, there are also recent reports that blockade of both ETA and ETB receptors is insufficient to inhibit intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in porcine coronary artery, in contrast to the results of selective ETA receptor antagonism.30,31 These studies suggest that selective inhibition of ETA receptors is better for the treatment of vascular diseases, because selective ETA receptor antagonism alternatively activated the ETB receptor system, which plays a vasculoprotective role in injured artery through NO activation. Our findings revealed by KO mice were in accordance with these previous reports.

In the blood flow cessation model used in this study, 14,15 a major cause of the vascular lesion formation is no-flow stimulus, whereas restenosis after coronary angioplasty in humans is triggered primarily by mechanical endothelial injury. Moreover, although it seems certain that a decrease in blood flow is associated with the cause of human vascular diseases,32,33 the no-flow phenomenon that occurred in the ligated carotid artery is not generally seen in the human diseased artery, such as in restenosis or atherosclerosis. Thus, we address some differences in the pathogenesis of vascular remodeling between humans and this experimental model as a study limitation.

Conclusions

Neointimal formation and vascular stenosis caused by the cessation of blood flow were markedly accelerated in the carotid artery of KO mice. The phenomenon was attributed in part to a decrease in NO release originating from ETB receptor deficiency in KO mice. We also observed that long-term treatment with an ETB receptor antagonist worsened vascular remodeling in WT mice. Moreover, long-term ETA receptor blockade significantly attenuated vascular stenosis in both WT and KO mice. These results suggest that the ETA receptor system plays an aggravating role, whereas the ETB receptor system plays a favorable inhibitory role, at least partly through NO release, in vascular remodeling after injury. These findings provide a novel insight into the pathophysiological roles of the subtypes of ET receptors in vascular diseases and a potential clinical indication for using ET receptor antagonists.

Guest Editor for this article was Robert J. Bache, MD, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

Although endothelin (ET) type A (ETA) receptor blockade is reported to be effective in ameliorating vascular remodeling after injury, there is no report on the long-term effects of selective inhibition of ET type B (ETB) receptors on vascular remodeling after injury. In this study, we demonstrated that inactivation of the vascular ETB receptor system is harmful for vascular remodeling after injury, the mechanism of which is partly attributed to decreased NO release, in ETB receptor–knockout mice. These results suggest that the overall effect of vascular ETB receptors stimulated by endogenous ET-1 is antiproliferative in the injured artery.

This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan (11357019, 11557047, and 12470147) and by a grant from the Miyauchi Project of Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance at the University of Tsukuba.

Footnotes

Correspondence to Takashi Miyauchi, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan. E-mail

References

  • 1 Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988; 332: 411–415.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Miyauchi T, Masaki T. Pathophysiology of endothelin in the cardiovascular system. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999; 61: 391–415.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Clozel M, Gray GA, Breu V, et al. The endothelin ETB receptor mediates both vasodilation and vasoconstriction in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992; 186: 867–873.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Namiki A, Hirata Y, Ishikawa M, et al. Endothelin-1- and endothelin-3-induced vasorelaxation via common generation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Life Sci. 1992; 50: 677–682.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kirchengast M, Munter K. Endothelin and restenosis. Cardiovasc Res. 1998; 39: 550–555.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Douglas SA, Louden C, Vickery-Clark LM, et al. A role for endogenous endothelin-1 in neointimal formation after rat carotid artery balloon angioplasty. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 190–197.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ferrer P, Valentine M, Jenkins-West T, et al. Orally active receptor antagonist BMS-182874 suppresses neointimal development in balloon-injured rat carotid arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995; 26: 908–915.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Burke SE, Lubbers NL, Gagne GD, et al. Selective antagonism of the ETA receptor reduces neointimal hyperplasia after balloon-induced vascular injury in pigs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997; 30: 33–41.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hosoda K, Hammer RE, Giad A, et al. Targeted and natural (piebald-lethal) mutations of endothelin-B receptor gene produce megacolon associated with spotted coat color in mice. Cell. 1994; 79: 1267–1276.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Puffenberger EG, Hosoda K, Washington SS, et al. A missense mutation of the endothelin-B-receptor gene in multigenic Hirschsprung’s disease. Cell. 1994; 79: 1257–1266.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gariepy CE, Williams SC, Richardson JA, et al. Transgenic expression of the endothelin-B receptor prevents congenital intestinal aganglionosis in a rat model of Hirschsprung disease. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1092–1101.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rice J, Doggett B, Sweetser DA, et al. Transgenic rescue of aganglionosis and piebaldism in lethal spotted mice. Dev Dyn. 2000; 217: 120–132.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gariepy CE, Ohuchi T, Williams SC, et al. Salt-sensitive hypertension in endothelin-B receptor-deficient rats. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 925–933.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kumar A, Lindner V. Remodeling with neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery after cessation of blood flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 2238–2244.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Godin D, Ivan E, Johnson C, et al. Remodeling of carotid artery is associated with increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases in mouse blood flow cessation model. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2861–2866.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sakai S, Miyauchi T, Yamaguchi I. Long-term endothelin receptor antagonist administration improves alterations in expression of various cardiac genes in failing myocardium of rats with heart failure. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2849–2853.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maki S, Miyauchi T, Sakai S, et al. Endothelin-1 expression in hearts of transgenic hypertensive mice overexpressing angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998; 31 (suppl 1): S412–S416.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kobayashi T, Miyauchi T, Iwasa S, et al. Corresponding distributions of increased endothelin-B receptor expression and increased endothelin-1 expression in the aorta of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice with advanced atherosclerosis. Pathol Int. 2000; 50: 929–936.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ishikawa S, Miyauchi T, Ueno M, et al. Abnormal neurohumoral responses to exercise in patients with heart disease: inhibition of an increase in endothelin-1 production during exercise. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998; 31 (suppl 1): S406–S411.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Iemitsu M, Miyauchi T, Maeda S, et al. Intense exercise causes decrease in expression of both endothelial NO synthase and tissue NOx level in hearts. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279: R951–R959.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Privat C, Bedioui LF, van Brussel M, et al. Nitric oxide production by endothelial cells: comparison of three methods of quantification. Life Sci. 1997; 61: 1193–1202.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lerman A, Edwards BS, Hallett JW, et al. Circulating and tissue endothelin immunoreactivity in advanced atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325: 997–1001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Wang X, Douglas SA, Louden C, et al. Expression of endothelin-1, endothelin-3, endothelin-converting enzyme-1, and endothelin-A and endothelin-B receptor mRNA after angioplasty-induced neointimal formation in the rat. Circ Res. 1996; 78: 322–328.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Picard P, Smith PJW, Monge JC, et al. Expression of endothelial factors after arterial injury in the rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998; 31 (suppl 1): S323–S327.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Malek A, Izumo S. Physiological fluid shear stress causes downregulation of endothelin-1 mRNA in bovine aortic endothelium. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263: C389–C396.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Uematsu M, Ohara Y, Navas JP, et al. Regulation of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression by shear stress. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269: C1371–C1378.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rudic RD, Shesely EG, Maeda N, et al. Direct evidence for the importance of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in vascular remodeling. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 731–736.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Cattaruzza M, Dimigen C, Ehrenreich H, et al. Stretch-induced endothelin B receptor-mediated apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells. FASEB J. 2000; 14: 991–998.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Barton M, Haudenschild CC, d’Uscio LV, et al. Endothelin ETA receptor blockade restores NO-mediated endothelial function and inhibits atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 14367–14372.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 McKenna CJ, Burke SE, Opgenorth TJ, et al. Selective ETA receptor antagonism reduces neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary stent model. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2551–2556.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Huckle WR, Drag MD, Acker WR, et al. Effects of L-749,329, an ETA/ETB endothelin receptor antagonist, in a porcine coronary artery injury model of vascular restenosis. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1899–1905.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Herity NA, Ward MR, Lo S, et al. Clinical aspects of vascular remodeling. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999; 10: 1016–1024.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, et al. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 1983; 53: 502–514.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar