Series of Monographs on Venous Thromboembolic Disease
This, the second monograph in a four-part series on venous thromboembolic disease, is centered around diagnostic approaches to patients with venous thromboembolism. Detailed descriptions of duplex ultrasonography, contrast venography, and emerging diagnostic modalities, including computerized tomographic angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, and D-dimer assays are provided, along with diagnostic algorithms. As in the preceding monograph, which covered the epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history, the objective of these supplements is to provide a current review applicable to the identification and management of venous thromboembolic states in primary care practice. These disorders, which affect millions of people (especially those predisposed by serious illness, major surgery, intrinsic venous disease or hypercoagulable states), are responsible for considerable mortality and disability.
The premise underlying this series is that, as with most vascular diseases, responsibility for recognition and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients at risk is mainly in the hands of the primary care physician. These supplements have, therefore, been written with the needs of the practitioner in mind, aiming to provide a comprehensive compendium of practical information based whenever possible on data from well-designed clinical trials so that recommendations parallel widely-accepted clinical practice guidelines. Areas of controversy are identified as such, and when there is no consensus about optimum management, pragmatic approaches are offered.
For all of the monographs we have selected guest editors who are widely recognized specialists in their respective topic areas, and asked them to guide the selection of authors for each detailed clinical review. A board jointly selected by the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology and the editors of Circulation has reviewed each manuscript.
Future issues in this series will review alternative strategies for prevention and management of venous thromboembolic disease. Although effective prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism is available in the form of a variety of antithrombotic agents, these drugs carry a risk of bleeding that make judicious use dependent on appropriate assessment of patient-specific thromboembolic risk. When preventive strategies fail or are overlooked, the problem of venous thromboembolism similarly requires a risk-based therapeutic approach. Hence, a comprehensive review of therapeutic alternatives completes the series. Comparisons of low-molecular-weight heparins to unfractionated heparin, the use of oral vitamin K antagonists, and such emerging avenues as direct thrombin inhibitors and synthetic pentasaccharides round out the analysis of current algorithms.
We hope this series of monographs provides for primary care physicians and specialists alike a comprehensive resource for current strategies in the diagnosis and management of this common and debilitating disease, fostering improved patient care.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2004.
History
Published online: 30 March 2004
Published in print: 30 March 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Cardiovascular disease risk factors and their associations with inflammation among US adolescents: NHANES, 2015 to March 2020, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 12, 4, (e004148), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004148
- Cardiovascular disease risk in patients with inflammatory arthritis nowadays still substantially elevated, RMD Open, 9, 4, (e003485), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003485
- The oft-overlooked cardiovascular complications of inflammatory bowel disease, Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, 19, 4, (375-391), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2023.2174971
- Excessive daytime sleepiness: an emerging marker of cardiovascular risk, Heart, 108, 22, (1761-1766), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319596
- Effect on Cardiac Function of Longstanding Juvenile-onset Mixed Connective Tissue Disease: A Controlled Study, The Journal of Rheumatology, 46, 7, (739-747), (2019).https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180526
- Association between active brown adipose tissue and coronary artery calcification in healthy men, Nuklearmedizin, 56, 05, (184-190), (2018).https://doi.org/10.3413/Nukmed-0887-17-03
- The Endocrine Regulation of Blood Pressure, Principles of Endocrinology and Hormone Action, (611-625), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44675-2_23
- Are ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events? A prospective nationwide population-based cohort study, Arthritis Research & Therapy, 19, 1, (2017).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1315-z
- Associations between vitamin K status and haemostatic and inflammatory biomarkers in community-dwelling adults, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 112, 09, (438-444), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1160/TH13-12-1003
- Modeling vascular inflammation and atherogenicity after inhalation of ambient levels of ozone: exploratory lessons from transcriptomics, Inhalation Toxicology, 29, 3, (96-105), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1080/08958378.2017.1310333
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.