Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups.
Abstract
To evaluate the comparative effects of medical and surgical therapy on quality of life of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 780 patients who had been randomly assigned to medical or surgical therapy in the CASS were systematically followed for a mean of 5.5. years. Analysis was performed according to original treatment assignment. Patients in the surgical group had significantly less chest pain, fewer activity limitations, and required less therapy with nitrates and beta-blockers. Treadmill exercise tests performed 6, 18, and 60 months after entry documented significantly longer treadmill time, less exercise-induced angina, and less ST segment depression among surgical group patients. However, employment status and recreational status did not differ significantly between medical and surgical groups. Total number of hospitalizations after randomization was higher in the surgical group owing primarily to rehospitalization during the first year of follow-up for the coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Risk factors, including high blood pressure, cigarette smoking, high cholesterol levels, overweight, and poor exercise habits remained similar between medical and surgical groups. This randomized collaborative study shows that coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves the quality of life as manifested by relief of chest pain, improvement in both subjective and objective measurements of functional status, and a diminished requirement for drug therapy. However, no significant effect on employment or recreational status was observed.
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by American Heart Association.
History
Published online: 1 November 1983
Published in print: November 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Diabetics: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?, International Journal of Angiology, 30, 03, (194-201), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730446
- Lifestyle Medicine Philippines: A Journey of Hope, American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 14, 6, (615-617), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827620951752
- Medical-Social Expertise and Rehabilitation Indicators in Patients with Chronic after Roascularization, Ukraïnsʹkij žurnal medicini, bìologìï ta sportu, 2, 3, (94-99), (2017).https://doi.org/10.26693/jmbs02.03.094
- Modern coronary rehabilitation, Postgraduate Medicine, 94, 2, (131-141), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1993.11945698
- Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality, La radiologia medica, 122, 12, (893-901), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0800-4
- Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after the second-generation cobalt–chromium sirolimus-eluting stents implantation in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients: a subgroup analysis from the prospective FOCUS registry, Annals of Medicine, 48, 3, (202-210), (2016).https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2016.1162324
- Prompt impact of first prospective statin mega-trials on postoperative lipid management of CABG patients: a 20-year follow-up in a single hospital, Lipids in Health and Disease, 15, 1, (2016).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-016-0292-6
- Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, Cardiovascular Surgery, 1, 5, (563-568), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1177/096721099300100519
- Use and Misuse of No-Difference Findings in Eliminating Threats To Validity, Evaluation Review, 10, 6, (836-852), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8601000608
- Evaluating Health Care, American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 4, (527-542), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1177/000276485028004009
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.