Inhibition of Neointimal Proliferation With Low-Dose Irradiation From a β-Particle–Emitting Stent
Abstract
Background Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty is the major factor limiting the long-term effectiveness of this procedure. Neointimal proliferation in response to arterial injury is an important contributor to restenosis. The use of radiation for the treatment of malignant and benign proliferative conditions has been well established. External beam irradiation and endovascular irradiation by use of an after-loading technique have been shown to inhibit neointimal proliferation in experimental models of restenosis. The objective of this study was to investigate whether low-dose irradiation from a β-particle–emitting stent would inhibit neointimal proliferation after placement in porcine iliac arteries.
Methods and Results Fourteen titanium-mesh stents were implanted in the iliac arteries of nine NIH miniature swine. There were seven β-particle–emitting radioisotope stents (32P, activity level 0.14 μCi) and seven control stents (31P, nonradioactive). Treatment effect was assessed by angiography and histomorphological examination of the stented iliac segments 28 days after implantation. There was a significant reduction in neointimal area (1.76±0.37 mm2 versus 2.81±1.22 mm2, P=.05) and percent area stenosis (24.6±2.9% versus 36.0±10.7%, P=.02) within the β-particle–emitting stents compared with the control stents. Neointimal thickness, which was assessed at each wire site, was also significantly less within the treatment stents (0.26±0.04 mm versus 0.38±0.10 mm, P=.012). Scanning electron microscopy was performed on sections from four stents. This demonstrated endothelialization of both the treatment and control stents. There was no excess inflammatory reaction or fibrosis in the media, adventitia, or perivascular space of vessels treated with the β-particle–emitting stent compared with control vessels. At 28 days, there was no difference in smooth muscle cell proliferation as measured by the proliferating cell nuclear antigen index.
Conclusions A local, continuous source of low-dose endovascular irradiation via a β-particle–emitting stent inhibits neointimal formation in porcine arteries. This low dose of local irradiation did not prevent endothelialization of the stents. This novel technique offers promise for the prevention of restenosis and warrants further investigation.
Restenosis occurs in approximately 30% to 50% of cases after successful PTCA and is the major factor limiting the long-term effectiveness of this procedure.12345 There is clinical and experimental evidence to suggest that restenosis results from a complex interaction between early elastic recoil, arterial remodeling, and neointimal formation. Neointimal formation is an important contributor to this process, particularly after intracoronary stent placement, and results from the migration and rapid proliferation of a subset of predominantly medially derived SMCs. These cells proliferate as a response to catheter-induced mechanical injury and stimulation by a variety of growth factors and cytokines.6789 Experimental models of arterial injury have demonstrated that these cells begin proliferating within the first week after injury and return to baseline levels of proliferation within 1 to 2 months.10111213 This early proliferation is followed by the elaboration of an extracellular matrix that further contributes to neointimal formation and ultimately results in narrowing of the arterial lumen.
Numerous trials in humans with a variety of pharmacological agents have failed to demonstrate a reduction in the incidence of restenosis.8 The use of radiation for the treatment of malignant and benign proliferative conditions has been well established. Low-dose external beam irradiation has been shown to inhibit keloid formation after surgery14151617 and heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.181920 This safe and effective use of radiation therapy for benign proliferative conditions has led several investigators to test whether local irradiation might inhibit SMC proliferation after arterial injury. A single dose of external beam irradiation has been tested and was shown to be effective in two different experimental models of restenosis.2122 Several investigators have demonstrated that gamma irradiation by use of an endovascular after-loading technique can successfully inhibit neointimal proliferation in a porcine coronary injury model.232425 These investigators used a 192Ir source to deliver an endovascular dose from 350 to 2500 cGy either immediately before, after, or within a few days of balloon injury. A dose-response relationship was demonstrated, with the greatest effect seen at higher doses (≥1400 cGy). Intraarterial beta irradiation at a dose of 1800 cGy has also been shown to be effective in a model of hypercholesterolemic rabbit restenosis.26 Hehrlein et al2728 showed that a radioactive stent can inhibit neointimal proliferation after implantation in nondiseased rabbit iliac arteries. They used a stainless steel stent (Palmaz-Schatz, Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems) made radioactive by proton bombardment in a cyclotron with a resulting array of gamma- and β-particle–emitting radionuclides 55,56,57Co, 52Mg, and 55Fe. These radionuclides have a half-life between 17.5 hours and 2.7 years. At 4 and 12 weeks after stent implantation, there was almost complete inhibition of neointimal proliferation in this model.
The previously described techniques suffer somewhat from impracticality as well as questions of safety regarding the use of gamma irradiation and radionuclides of such long half-life. β-Particle irradiation with 32P offers the advantages of no associated gamma radiation, a short half-life (14.3 days), and limited range of the β-particles in tissue (3 to 4 mm). This should essentially eliminate the risk to catheterization laboratory personnel and minimize the exposure of surrounding cardiac and pulmonary tissue to ionizing radiation. The objective of the current study was to investigate whether low-dose β-particle irradiation from a 32P-impregnated stent could inhibit neointimal proliferation after implantation in porcine iliac arteries.
Methods
Stent Preparation
The stents used in the present study are a modification of the Strecker Stent (Boston Scientific Corp). The design consists of a single filament of polished titanium wire, 0.125 mm in diameter, woven into a flexible mesh tube. The stents were 20 mm in length with an expanded diameter of 5 mm. After stent fabrication, the nonradioactive element 31P was ion-implanted beneath the outer surface of the titanium wire (Spire Corp). Ion implantation was accomplished by placing the 31P into a special vacuum apparatus, then vaporizing, ionizing, and accelerating the ions with a high voltage so that the 31P atoms became buried beneath the surface of the titanium wire.
The stents were then made radioactive by placement in the core of an experimental nuclear reactor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. They were exposed for several hours to a flux of slow neutrons. Neutron irradiation caused approximately 1 of every 100 000 31P atoms to be converted into 32P, the pure β-particle emitter with a maximum energy of 1.709 MeV, an average energy of 0.695 MeV, and a half-life of 14.3 days. The reaction is given by the simple equation 31P+N=32P, where N indicates neutron. This technique results in even distribution of 32P within the stent wire, which ensures uniform delivery of β-particle irradiation into the vessel wall. After a period of approximately 10 days, the radiation from other short-lived isotopes created by neutron bombardment of the titanium base metal becomes undetectably low. Spectroscopic measurements indicated that no other long-lived radionucleotides were created. The radioactive stents were mounted onto balloon catheters (Boston Scientific Corp). The assembly was then packaged and gamma-ray sterilized in the conventional manner. The control stents were fabricated in a manner identical to the radioisotope stents except that they were not placed in a reactor, so that no atoms of 31P were converted to 32P.
After each radioactive stent was placed over the deflated balloon of the balloon angioplasty catheter, a cylindrical acrylic resin radiation shield with an OD of 16 mm, an ID of 2.2 mm, and a wall thickness of 6.9 mm was placed over the stent. Radiation detectors placed outside each shield indicated no increase in radiation activity above background levels. The shield was designed so that its distal end could be advanced into the elastomer gland of a Tuohy-Borst “Y” adapter. With the shield in place, the stent could be advanced through the Tuohy-Borst adapter into the guiding catheter without exposing the operator to any radiation from the stent (Fig 1).
After removal from the reactor, each stent had an activity level of approximately 0.4 μCi. The activity level of each stent was measured with a gas-filled proportional-counting device. This detection system has been well described previously.29 The stents were implanted 20 days after removal from the reactor when the radiation level had decreased to an average value of 0.14 μCi for all the stents. The radiation levels at implantation were determined by calculations that used the known half-life for 32P (14.3 days) and the following equation: At=A0×2−t/τ, where At is the activity level at the time t (μCi), A0 is the initial activity level (μCi), t is time (days), and τ is the half-life of the radioisotope (days). The use of a 5-mm-diameter stent with an activity level of 0.14 μCi resulted in a calculated total radiation dose at the surface of the stent wires (over the lifetime of the isotope) of approximately 300 cGy. The radiation dose delivered over the 28-day study period was equivalent to three fourths of the total radiation dose. The dose to tissue versus radial distance outward from the stent wires (both total and 28-day dose) is plotted in Fig 2. The calculations of dose distribution were performed by use of the dose-point-kernel method, which has been described previously.30 This method uses several assumptions, including the assumption that the source is a uniform cylinder. A calculated dose was compared with a directly measured dose for an unexpanded, 2.1-μCi, 2.2-mm-diameter, 2-cm-long titanium-mesh stent (Fig 3). There was good correlation between the directly measured and calculated radiation doses.
Animal Preparation
The animal work was approved by the institutional scientific review committee and conformed with the position of the American Heart Association on animal research. Fourteen stents (seven control, seven 32P-impregnated) were implanted in the right and/or left external iliac arteries of nine NIH miniature swine (weight, 20 to 30 kg) fed a normal chow diet. The animals were medicated with aspirin (650 mg) and extended-release nifedipine (30 mg) (Pfizer Laboratories Division) by mouth the evening before stent placement. Ketamine (20 mg/kg IM) and xylazine (4 mg/kg IM) were used for induction of anesthesia. General anesthesia was maintained by use of an intravenous fentanyl infusion (Elkins-Sinn) at a rate of 40 μg/kg per hour. A 9F sheath was placed retrograde in the right carotid artery. A bolus of heparin (150 U/kg) was administered intraarterially. The activated clotting time (Hemochron, Intl Technidyne) was measured to ensure a minimal value of 300 seconds for stent placement. Distal aortic and iliac angiography with 66% meglumine diatrizoate and 10% sodium diatrizoate (Hypaque-76, Sanofi Winthrop) was performed with a 9F multipurpose guiding catheter placed at the aortic bifurcation. The proximal iliac artery was engaged with the guiding catheter. A 0.014-in high-torque floppy guide wire (Advanced Cardiovascular Systems) was advanced to the femoral artery under fluoroscopy. The guiding catheter was used as a reference for stent sizing in an attempt to achieve a balloon (stent) to artery ratio just >1.0. Placement of the titanium-mesh stent (5.0 mm diameter, 20 mm length) was completed, after advancing the prosthesis over the guide wire to the desired site, with two balloon inflations at 8 atm for 30 seconds. This procedure was then repeated for stent placement in the opposite iliac artery. Angiography was completed after placement to confirm patency. The animals were allowed to recover and were returned to care facilities. All animals remained on a normal laboratory diet and received aspirin (81 mg) daily by mouth. The animals were returned to the research catheterization laboratory for angiography 28 days after implantation. After completion of follow-up angiography, the animals were euthanatized with a lethal dose of a barbiturate.
Pathological Evaluation
The iliac arteries were isolated and perfusion fixed with an ethanol-based fixative (Histochoice; Amresco) at 60 to 80 mm Hg for 30 minutes via a catheter positioned in the distal aorta. The distal aorta and iliac vessels were then carefully removed and placed in fixative. The stented arterial segments were sectioned transversely into 2-mm segments. Sections from the proximal, mid, and distal portion of the stent were embedded in paraffin and cut with a carbide knife at 4 to 5 μ. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Movat pentachrome stains. The cross-sectional area of each section was measured with digital morphometry to determine area within the external elastic lamina, the IEL, the media, and the residual vessel lumen. The area within the IEL was considered the normal lumen area. The percent area stenosis was then defined as: [(IEL area−residual lumen area)/IEL area]×100. Neointimal area was determined by subtracting the area of the residual lumen from the area within the IEL. A mean value for each area within the stented arterial segment was derived from the proximal, mid, and distal measurements.
The vessel injury score was determined by the method used by Schwartz et al.31 In brief, the degree of injury at each wire site was assessed as follows: grade 0, IEL intact with media compressed; grade 1, IEL lacerated with media compressed; grade 2, IEL and media lacerated with the external elastic lamina intact; and grade 3, external elastic lamina lacerated. Neointimal thickness was measured at each wire site. The mean injury score for each arterial segment was calculated by dividing the sum of injury scores at each wire site by the total number of wires from the midstent sections. In addition to the mean injury score, the degree of stent oversizing (stent to artery ratio) was determined with quantitative angiography.
Quantification of SMC Proliferation
Stent wires were carefully removed from adjacent tissue sections of each arterial segment. The segments were dehydrated in graded series of alcohol and embedded in paraffin, and multiple sections were cut at 4 to 5 μ. The sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies to α-smooth muscle actin and PCNA. In brief, slides were deparaffinized and pretreated with antigen pretreatment solution (BioGenex Labs) for 5 minutes. The slides were then incubated with 10% normal horse serum followed by incubation with mouse anti-human PCNA antibody (Dako), 1:40 dilution, for 60 minutes. Biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG was used as the secondary antibody, and the detection system used was the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Labs, Inc). Slides were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin. A section of tonsil served as a positive control for each series of immunohistochemical staining for PCNA. The total number of cells and the number of PCNA-positive cells per high-power field were counted from three randomly selected regions of each section. Only cells with distinct nuclear PCNA staining were considered positive. At least 50 cells per high-power field were manually counted for a minimum total of 150 cells per section to derive a PCNA index (percentage of PCNA positive cells=number of PCNA positive cells/total number of cells×100%). Actin staining followed the same procedure as above with mouse anti-human α-smooth muscle actin antibody (Sigma Chem Co) in a 1:5000 dilution.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Segments were selected from four control and four β-particle–stented arteries, sectioned longitudinally, rinsed in three changes of sodium phosphate for 15 minutes each, then fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour and rinsed in distilled water. The specimens were then dehydrated in a series of graded ethanols (50% to 100%) for 15 minutes. After critical point drying, the specimens were mounted, placed in a vacuum coater, and coated with a 30- to 40-nm layer of gold for scanning electron microscopy.
Quantitative Angiography
The angiograms were analyzed with electronic digital calipers with use of the guiding catheter as a reference standard. The baseline and postimplant artery diameters (data expressed in millimeters) were measured at midstent from nonoverlapped and nonforeshortened views. The acute stent to artery ratio (midstent lumen diameter/baseline lumen diameter) was calculated from these data for each vessel to provide an estimate of stent oversizing as a measure of arterial injury.
Statistical Analysis
For each of the 14 arterial segments in the study, the stent to artery ratio, mean injury score, neointimal thickness, neointimal area, medial area, and percent area stenosis were determined. All data are expressed as mean±SD. Lesion morphology and PCNA index scores were compared for the control and radioactive stents by use of ANOVA with Scheffé’s F test for multiple comparisons. A value of P<.05 was considered significant. All statistics were calculated with Statview 4.0 (Abacus).
Results
Fourteen titanium stents were placed in the external iliac arteries of nine pigs (Table 1). There were 7 control stents and 7 treatment stents. All 14 stents were deployed without complication and each of the animals survived to 28 days. Follow-up angiography demonstrated 100% patency of the stents. The radioactive stents had an activity of 0.14 μCi at the time of implantation, with a calculated total dose over the lifetime of the isotope of approximately 300 cGy delivered at the surface of the stent wires. The dose delivered during the 28-day study period was equivalent to three fourths of the total lifetime dose.
Histopathology
As previously described, attempts were made to size the stents just >1:1 to the treatment vessel. There was no difference in the stent to artery ratio between the treatment and control stents (1.01±0.03 versus 1.02±0.08, P=.86). Review of the histological sections revealed no difference between the treatment and control groups with regard to vessel injury (grade 0 for all sections). The IEL was intact in each case.
There was a statistically significant reduction in neointimal area (1.76±0.37 mm2 versus 2.81±1.22 mm2, P=.05) and percent area stenosis (24.6±2.9% versus 36.0±10.7%, P=.02) in the β-particle emitting–stents compared with control stents. There was a trend toward an increase in lumen area in the treatment group (5.38±0.75 mm2 versus 4.68±0.55 mm2, P=.07) (Table 2). Neointimal thickness was assessed at each wire site, and the mean neointimal thickness was also significantly less within the β-particle–emitting stents compared with the control stents (0.26±0.04 mm versus 0.38±0.10 mm, P=.01). There was no difference in the size of the vessels as measured by the area within the external elastic lamina and IEL (Fig 4).
Review of the histological sections from both the treatment and control stents demonstrated neointimal proliferation with a predominant population of spindle-shaped cells staining positive for α-actin. These SMCs were haphazardly arranged near the stent wires with abundant extracellular matrix. At the lumen surface, the SMCs were more circumferentially organized and had a higher cellular density compared with cells adjacent to the stent wires (Fig 5). The IEL was intact in all sections, indicating an absence of deep vessel wall injury. There was mild compression of the media with minimal medial SMC necrosis. Scattered inflammatory cells were present adjacent to stent wires (Fig 5B and 5D). The degree of inflammatory reaction was minimal and similar at the site of β-particle and control stent wires. There was no excess fibrosis in the media, adventitia, or perivascular space of the vessels treated with a β-particle–emitting stent compared with control vessels.
The percentage of PCNA-positive cells was measured in a midstent section from each stent at 28 days. The mean cell proliferation index was similar for the treatment and control stents (2.15±0.91% versus 3.95±4.21%, P=.44). Cell density was also measured within the same sections and was similar between the two groups (362±42 versus 349±45 cells per high-power field, P=.46).
Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated complete endothelialization of all control and treatment stents except at the proximal and distal ends of the stents over protruding wire loops. The stents were covered with a population of immature, cobblestone-shaped endothelial cells (Fig 6).
Discussion
The rationale for use of irradiation to inhibit neointimal proliferation is based on the enhanced sensitivity of actively proliferating cells to the lethal effects of ionizing radiation. When the cell nucleus is exposed to ionizing radiation, DNA mutations and chromosome aberrations can occur. The ability of the cells to replicate is impaired, and ultimately cell death results. Radiation has been shown to inhibit benign “hyperplastic” responses such as keloid formation after surgery, fibroblast-mediated obliteration of filtering blebs after glaucoma surgery, and heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.1415161718192032 More recently, several investigators showed that external beam x-irradiation and endovascular gamma irradiation with an after-loading technique can inhibit neointimal proliferation in experimental models of restenosis.2122232425 There was also one clinical study33 that demonstrated a beneficial effect of endovascular irradiation on restenosis in the peripheral circulation after stenting. Only one experimental study34 failed to show a beneficial effect of radiation on the restenotic process. Schwartz et al34 found that x-irradiation actually modestly increased the neointimal proliferation seen after oversized stent placement in porcine coronary arteries. This negative result possibly was due to methodological differences, which included the use of relatively low radiation doses in the setting of more extensive vessel injury.
In the current study, we have shown that low-dose irradiation from a β-particle–emitting stent inhibits neointimal proliferation after stent placement in porcine iliac arteries. There was a 37% reduction in neointimal area and a 32% reduction in percent area stenosis for β-particle–emitting stents compared with control stents at 28 days in this model.
Rationale for Use of a β-Particle–Emitting Stent
The use of a β-particle–emitting stent to deliver low-dose irradiation to the vessel wall offers several advantages over previously described techniques for endovascular irradiation. Use of a radioactive stent couples the radiation therapy to a platform with a known benefit for the prevention of restenosis.3536 Mechanical factors such as ineffective dilatation, early elastic recoil, and chronic remodeling contribute to restenosis and would not likely be affected by the radiation therapy alone. Endovascular after-loading represents an alternative method for intravascular irradiation. This technique requires that a special radioactive catheter or wire be advanced across the lesion before PTCA, immediately after PTCA, or within a few days of the procedure to deliver the 192IR source. This might result in significant ischemia if performed before PTCA and in dissection or vessel trauma if performed sometime after the dilatation. Because the delivery catheter may not always be centered within the vessel lumen, there will be nonuniformity of dose delivery into the vessel wall. This may range from 0.6× to 2.9× the prescribed dose.24 In addition, these after-loading devices are costly, require handling of highly radioactive sources (0.2 to 10 Ci), and may require isolation of patients when gamma radiation is used.
β-particles have a limited effective range in tissue (≈95% of the particles are absorbed within 3 to 4 mm) and thus minimize the risk of radiation exposure to surrounding cardiac or pulmonary tissue. The radiation exposure to the interventionist implanting such a device and to technicians in the catheterization laboratory will be essentially zero. The total dose of radiation required from a 32P source to inhibit neointimal proliferation appears to be small. Previous in vitro work has shown that β-particle irradiation from a 32P-impregnated stent wire with an activity as low as 0.006 μCi/cm of wire results in complete inhibition of SMC proliferation within 6.0 mm of the wire in cell culture.29 In the current study, stents with an activity of 0.14 μCi, resulting in a 28-day tissue dose of approximately 210 cGy at the stent surface, proved effective in inhibiting neointimal proliferation. On the basis of prior published in vivo studies, it is likely that higher doses of radiation from a β-particle–emitting stent could provide further inhibition of neointimal proliferation.24
Endovascular Radiation to Inhibit Neointimal Formation
Various factors affect the radiation damage in a cell and hence the cell survival curve. The total dose, dose rate, linear energy transfer of the radiation, presence of chemical molecules, and stage of the cell cycle all affect the survival curve.37 The total radiation dose delivered in this model was low relative to previous models and in a range that might not be expected to result in cell death. Also, the dose rate was very low. Why then was this low-dose β-particle irradiation effective in decreasing neointima formation? The radiation was delivered constantly over a period of time during which it is known that SMCs in the intima and media are undergoing rapid proliferation. Thus, although a lethal dose of radiation is not given, this constant, low-dose radiation therapy may impair cell proliferation (static effect) without producing cell death (lethal effect) in all SMCs. In addition, this low-dose radiation may have other, unknown effects. Fischell et al29 demonstrated that β-particle irradiation from 32P-impregnated wire resulted in a zone of inhibition of up to 10.6 mm when placed in a cell culture of proliferating SMCs. Since very few β-particles could reach a range of 8 to 10 mm in cell culture, it is conceivable that very low (sublethal) doses of β-particle irradiation may also inhibit SMC migration.
An important question regarding the use of radiation to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia is whether reendothelialization of the stents will also be inhibited. A delay in reendothelialization could, theoretically, adversely affect the risk of subsequent stent thrombosis. In cell culture, proliferating bovine endothelial cells are less sensitive to the effects of β-particle irradiation than are rat or human SMCs.29 In the current study, endothelialization of the radioactive stents was evident by scanning electron microscopy 4 weeks after stent implantation. There was no noticeable difference with regard to endothelial cell growth within the treatment stents compared with control stents. Importantly, there was no stent thrombosis in the present study. Our data are consistent with preliminary work by Hehrlein et al,27 who showed nearly complete inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, endothelial regrowth at 4 weeks, and no increase in thrombotic complications after implantation of radioactive stents.
The use of radiation to inhibit neointimal proliferation does not appear to only postpone the restenotic process. Both Wiederman et al38 and Waksman et al24 demonstrated that the beneficial effect of endovascular irradiation was well maintained at 6-month follow-up in the porcine coronary model. C. Hehrlein, MD, (personal communication) has obtained follow-up at 1 year after use of radioactive stents in rabbit iliac arteries; the initial beneficial effect of radiation therapy was still present at 1 year. Because the degree of vessel injury and the type and method of radiation delivery differ in the current study, further study is required to assess the long-term effect of irradiation with this model. The use of fractionated dosing, with a total tissue dose less than that given as a single dose with the after-loading technique, would be expected to result in improved long-term safety.37
In the current study, we used the PCNA index to quantify SMC proliferation at 28 days after stent implantation. There was no significant difference in PCNA index between the treatment and control groups. Although this is a single measurement at a single point in time, it demonstrates that there is no delayed (rebound) SMC proliferation at 28 days after implantation of a radioactive stent with a short-lived radioisotope.
Biocompatibility of Stents Modified to Deliver Radiation
Modification of a metallic stent surface may alter the mechanical performance of the device or its blood and tissue biocompatibility. Polymer-coated stents designed to reduce thrombogenicity and provide a local method for drug delivery have been limited by problems with chronic tissue compatibility. Severe neointimal formation has been seen after implantation of these devices in porcine coronary arteries.3940 The ion implantation technique to render the stent radioactive is highly desirable in that it does not require the use of a potentially biologically active substance, such as a biodegradable polymer, to deliver the endovascular radiation. The absence of a significant foreign body reaction or evidence of a greater degree of vascular injury by the β-particle–emitting stent indicates acceptable tissue compatibility. The present stent modification techniques may alter the surface charge of the metal, thus affecting the risk for thrombosis. Although stent thrombosis did not occur in this study, further analysis of stent surface characteristics is required.
Study Limitations
The present study is limited by the use of a single radiation dose and the small number of stents. Although the dose selected for this study was based on prior in vitro analysis and represented an effective dose to inhibit SMC proliferation without preventing endothelial cell growth, additional study is required to define an optimal in vivo dose. As previously suggested, higher doses could provide more effective suppression of neointimal growth.24 These stents were implanted in normal arteries. In addition, stent placement was not associated with any significant vessel injury. This model differs from other models in which a proliferative response is invoked by more severe damage to the vessel wall. The dose and duration of endovascular radiation required to reduce neointimal formation in atherosclerotic vessels or vessels with more severe, deep injury may be different. The contribution of thrombus to the neointimal response in this model is also unknown. Larger studies with long-term follow-up will be required to confirm the persistence of this inhibitory effect on neointimal formation and to ensure the long-term safety of this technique. Further studies of lesion formation and SMC proliferation after coronary intervention are also necessary to enable selection of the appropriate radioisotope and dose for clinical studies.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that a locally applied continuous source of low-dose endovascular radiation via a β-particle–emitting stent inhibits neointimal formation after stent implantation in porcine arteries. This novel therapy may have a significant impact on stent restenosis and warrants further investigation.
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
| IEL | = | internal elastic lamina |
| PCNA | = | proliferating cell nuclear antigen |
| PTCA | = | percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty |
| SMC | = | smooth muscle cell |
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. R.E.F., D.R.F., and T.A.F. are inventors of the concept of a β-particle–emitting stent and have a financial interest in the device.
Figure 1.
Cylindrical acrylic resin radiation shield. The shield is designed so that the forward end can be advanced through the elastomer gland of the “Y” adapter to minimize the exposure of the operator to any radiation during insertion of the stent.
Figure 2.
Plot shows radiation dose to tissue vs radial distance from the stent wires for a 0.14-μCi, 5-mm-diameter, β-particle–emitting stent. Both the total dose delivered during the lifetime of the isotope and the 28-day dose are presented.
Figure 3.
Plot shows calculated vs measured dose for a single 2.1-μCi, 2-cm-long, titanium-mesh stent.
Figure 4.
Bar graph showing the relation between vessel size as measured by the area within the IEL, neointimal area, and lumen area for the control and β-particle groups. There was no difference in vessel size between the two groups (P=.63). There was a 37% reduction in neointimal area in the β-particle stent group (*P=.05). There was a trend toward an increase in lumen area (P=.07). Each bar represents the mean value±SD.
Figure 5.
Representative low-magnification and high-magnification sections, treated with Movat pentachrome stain, from control and treatment stented arteries. A, Low-magnification micrograph (bar=500 μ) from a control stent. There is a thick neointima within the stent wires. B, Higher-magnification (bar=100 μ) from the same control stent demonstrating an intact IEL with medial compression. At the base of the neointima, there is abundant extracellular matrix and scattered inflammatory cells. C, Low-magnification (bar=500 μ) micrograph from a β-particle stent. There is only a thin neointima covering the stent wires. D, Higher magnification (bar=100 μ) from the same stent. The IEL is intact with focal compression of the media. There is no excess fibrosis or inflammatory reaction in the neointima, media, or adventitia of the β-particle–treated vessel.
Figure 6.
Representative low-magnification and high-magnification scanning electron micrographs from a β-particle–emitting stent. A, There is complete covering of the stent wires (bar=500 μ). B, On higher magnification (bar=20 μ), the stent wires are covered with a population of immature, cobblestone-appearing endothelial cells.





| Animal | Stent Type | Location | IEL Area, mm2 | Neointimal Area, mm2 | Lumen Area, mm2 | Intimal Thickness, mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | Right iliac | 9.43 | 5.30 | 4.22 | 0.48 |
| 2 | Control | Right iliac | 7.49 | 3.00 | 4.67 | 0.46 |
| 3 | β-particle | Right iliac | 7.39 | 1.68 | 5.71 | 0.28 |
| Control | Left iliac | 7.25 | 2.30 | 4.97 | 0.34 | |
| 4 | β-particle | Right iliac | 8.13 | 2.20 | 5.93 | 0.30 |
| 5 | Control | Left iliac | 7.58 | 2.44 | 5.14 | 0.33 |
| 6 | β-particle | Right iliac | 8.42 | 2.00 | 6.38 | 0.28 |
| Control | Left iliac | 8.15 | 2.65 | 5.50 | 0.36 | |
| 7 | β-particle | Left iliac | 7.00 | 2.13 | 4.87 | 0.30 |
| Control | Right iliac | 6.69 | 2.69 | 4.00 | 0.46 | |
| 8 | β-particle | Right iliac | 5.29 | 1.16 | 4.13 | 0.23 |
| Control | Left iliac | 5.48 | 1.27 | 4.23 | 0.21 | |
| 9 | β-particle | Right iliac | 6.63 | 1.60 | 5.03 | 0.23 |
| β-particle | Left iliac | 7.12 | 1.54 | 5.58 | 0.22 |
| Stent Type | Vessel Morphometry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External Elastic Lamina Area, mm2 | IEL Area, mm2 | Lumen Area, mm2 | Neointimal Area, mm2 | Percent Area Stenosis | |
| Control (n=7) | 9.35±0.61 | 7.44±1.22 | 4.68±0.55 | 2.81 ±1.22 | 36.0±10.7 |
| β-particle (n=7) | 8.78±0.50 | 7.14±1.03 | 5.38±0.75 | 1.76±0.371 | 24.6 ±2.92 |
The study was funded in part by a grant from IsoStent Inc, Dayton, Md, and from the Department of Clinical Investigation at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The stents were provided by Boston Scientific Corporation, Watertown, Mass. The authors thank Lynn Bailey, Russ Jones, and Roger Hillhouse for their expert technical assistance in the research laboratory. Dennis M. Duggan, PhD, and Charles W. Coffey II, PhD, provided valuable assistance with dosimetry.
Footnotes
References
- 1 Holmes DR Jr, Vlietstra RE, Smith HC. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): a report from the PTCA registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53(suppl):77C-81C. Google Scholar
- 2 Kent KM. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol.1988; 61:67G-70G. MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 3 Serruys PW, Luitjen HE, Beatt KJ. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon—a quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1,2,3, and 4 months. Circ Res.1989; 79:1374-1385. LinkGoogle Scholar
- 4 Mabin TA, Holmes DR Jr, Smith HC. Follow-up clinical results in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circ Res.1985; 71:754-760. LinkGoogle Scholar
- 5 Califf RM, Fortin DF, Frid DJ, Harlan WR, Ohman EM, Bengtson JR, Nelson CL, Tcheng JE, Mark DB, Stack RS. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: an overview. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(suppl):2B-13B. Google Scholar
- 6 Austin GE, Ratliff MB, Hollman J. Intimal proliferation of smooth muscle cells as an explanation for recurrent coronary artery stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol.1985; 6:369-375. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 7 Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Ohishi H. Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: pathologic observations in 20 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol.1991; 17:433-439. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 8 Liu MW, Roubin GS, King SB III. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: potential biological determinants and role of intimal hyperplasia. Circulation.1989; 79:1374-1387. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 9 Steele PM, Chesebro JH, Stanson AW, Holmes DR, Dewanjee MK, Badimon L, Fuster V. Balloon angioplasty: natural history of the pathophysiological response to injury in a pig model. Circ Res.1985; 57:105-112. LinkGoogle Scholar
- 10 Carter AJ, Laird JR, Farb A, Kufs W, Wortham DC, Virmani R. Morphologic characteristics of lesion formation and time course of smooth muscle cell proliferation in a porcine proliferative restenosis model. J Am Coll Cardiol.1994; 24:1398-1405. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 11 Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes MM. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury: smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest.1983; 49:327-333. MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 12 Banai S, Shou M, Correa R, Jaklitsch MT, Douek PC, Bonner RF, Epstein SE, Unger EF. Rabbit ear model of injury-induced arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation: kinetics, reproducibility, and implications. Circ Res.1991; 69:748-756. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 13 Hanke H, Strohschneider T, Oberhoff M, Betz E, Karsch KR. Time course of smooth muscle cell proliferation in the intima and media of arteries following experimental angioplasty. Circ Res.1990; 67:6512-6519. Google Scholar
- 14 Kovalic JJ, Perez CA. Radiation therapy following keloidectomy: a 20-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1989; 17:77-80. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 15 Levy DS, Salter MM, Roth RE. Postoperative irradiation in the prevention of keloids. Am J Roentgenol.1976; 127:509-510. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 16 Enhamre A, Hammar H. Treatment of keloids with excision and postoperative x-ray irradiation. Dermatologica.1983; 167:90-93. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 17 Borok TL, Bray M, Sinclair I. Role of ionizing irradiation for 393 keloids. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1988; 14:865-870. Google Scholar
- 18 Ayers DC, Evarts CM, Parkinson JR. The prevention of heterotopic ossification in high-risk patients by low-dose radiation therapy after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1986; 68:1423-1430. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 19 Anthony P, Keys H, Evarts CM. Prevention of heterotopic bone formation with early postoperative irradiation in high risk patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 10 Gy vs. 20 Gy schedules. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1986; 13:365-369. Google Scholar
- 20 Sylvester JE, Greenberg P, Selch MT. The use of postoperative irradiation for the prevention of heterotopic bone formation after total hip replacement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1988; 14:471-476. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 21 Shefer A, Eigler NL, Whiting JS. Suppression of intimal hyperplasia after balloon angioplasty with local beta irradiation in rabbits. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 21:185A. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 22 Abbas MA, Afshari NA, Stadius ML, Kernoff RS, Fischell TA. External beam irradiation inhibits neointimal hyperplasia following balloon angioplasty. Int J Cardiol.1994; 44:191-202. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 23 Wiedermann JC, Marboe C, Amols H, Schwartz A, Weinberger J. Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol.1994; 23:1491-1498. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 24 Waksman R, Robinson KA, Crocker IR, Gravanis MB, Cipolla GD, King SB III. Endovascular low-dose irradiation inhibits neointima formation after coronary artery balloon injury in swine: a possible role for radiation therapy in restenosis prevention. Circulation.1995; 91:1533-1539. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 25 Mazur W, Ali NM, Dabaghi SF, Grinstead WC, Abukhalil J, Paradise P, DeFelice CA, Schulz D, Berner BM, Fajardo LF, French BA, Raizner AE. High dose rate intracoronary radiation suppresses neointimal proliferation in the stented and ballooned model of porcine restenosis. Circulation. 1994;90(suppl I):I-652. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 26 Verin V, Popowski Y, Urban P, Belenger J, Redard M, Costa M, Widmer M, Schwager M, Kurtz J, Rutishauser W. Intraarterial beta irradiation prevents neointimal hyperplasia in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit restenosis model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;2A:407. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 27 Hehrlein C, Zimmermann M, Metz J, Fehsenfeld P, von Hodenberg E. Radioactive coronary stent implantation inhibits neointimal proliferation in non-atherosclerotic rabbits. Circulation. 1993;88(suppl I):I-651. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 28 Hehrlein C, Riessen R, Gollan T, Dsnges K, Fehsenfeld P, von Hodenberg E. Arterial wall cell distribution after implantation of radioactive stents. Circulation. 1994;90(suppl I):I-597. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 29 Fischell TA, Kharma BK, Fischell DR, Loges PG, Coffey CW, Duggan DM, Naftilan AJ. Low-dose, β-particle emission from “stent” wire results in complete, localized inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circulation.1994; 90:2956-2963. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 30 Prestwich WV, Kennett TJ, Kus FW. The dose distribution produced by a 32P coated stent. Med Phys.1995; 22:313-320. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 31 Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol.1992; 19:267-274. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 32 Khaw PT, Ward S, Griereson I, Rice NSC. Effect of beta radiation on proliferating human tenon’s capsule fibroblasts. Br J Ophthalmol.1991; 75:580-583. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 33 Liermann D, Bottcher HD, Kollath J, Schopohl B, Strassmann G, Strecker EP, Breddin KH. Prophylactic endovascular radiotherapy to prevent intimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in femoropopliteal arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.1994; 17:12-16. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 34 Schwartz RS, Koval TM, Edwards WD. Effect of external beam irradiation on neointimal hyperplasia after experimental coronary artery injury. J Am Coll Cardiol.1992; 19:1106-1113. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 35 Serruys PW, De Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, Belardi J, Sigwart U, Colombo A, Goy JJ, Van Den Heuvel P, Delcan J, Morel MA, for the Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.1994; 331:489-495. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 36 Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Beltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman M, Heuser R, Almond D, Teirstein PS, Fish RD, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Shaknovich A, Hirshfeld J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med.1994; 331:496-501. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 37 Hall EJ. Cell-survival curves. In: Hall EJ, ed. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: J.B. Lippincott Co; 1988:18-38. Google Scholar
- 38 Wiederman JG, Marboe C, Amols H, Schwartz A, Weinberger J. Intracoronary irradiation markedly reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in a porcine model: six month follow-up. Circulation. 1994;90(suppl I):I-652. Abstract. Google Scholar
- 39 Murphy JG, Schwartz RS, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Percutaneous polymeric stents in porcine coronary arteries: initial experience with polyethylene terephthalate stents. Circulation.1992; 86:1596-1604. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 40 Lincoff AM, Furst JG, Lee P. Local delivery of dexamethasone by an eluting stent attenuates the adverse response to biodegradable polymer in the porcine coronary artery. Circulation. 1993;88(suppl I):I-655. Abstract.Google Scholar


