Skip main navigation

Heart Rate Variability

Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use
Originally published 1996;93:1043–1065

    The last two decades have witnessed the recognition of a significant relationship between the autonomic nervous system and cardiovascular mortality, including sudden cardiac death.1234 Experimental evidence for an association between propensity for lethal arrhythmias and signs of either increased sympathetic or reduced vagal activity has spurred efforts for the development of quantitative markers of autonomic activity.

    HRV represents one of the most promising such markers. The apparently easy derivation of this measure has popularized its use. As many commercial devices now provide an automated measurement of HRV, the cardiologist has been provided with a seemingly simple tool for both research and clinical studies.5 However, the significance and meaning of the many different measures of HRV are more complex than generally appreciated, and there is a potential for incorrect conclusions and for excessive or unfounded extrapolations.

    Recognition of these problems led the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology to constitute a Task Force charged with the responsibility of developing appropriate standards. The specific goals of this Task Force were to (1) standardize nomenclature and develop definitions of terms, (2) specify standard methods of measurement, (3) define physiological and pathophysiological correlates, (4) describe currently appropriate clinical applications, and (5) identify areas for future research.

    To achieve these goals, the members of the Task Force were drawn from the fields of mathematics, engineering, physiology, and clinical medicine. The standards and proposals offered in this text should not limit further development but should allow appropriate comparisons, promote circumspect interpretations, and lead to further progress in the field.

    The phenomenon that is the focus of this report is the oscillation in the interval between consecutive heartbeats as well as the oscillations between consecutive instantaneous heart rates. “Heart rate variability” has become the conventionally accepted term to describe variations of both instantaneous heart rate and RR intervals. To describe oscillation in consecutive cardiac cycles, other terms have been used in the literature, for example, cycle length variability, heart period variability, RR variability, and RR interval tachogram, and they more appropriately emphasize the fact that it is the interval between consecutive beats that is being analyzed rather than the heart rate per se. However, these terms have not gained as wide acceptance as HRV; thus, we will use the term HRV in this document.


    The clinical relevance of HRV was first appreciated in 1965 when Hon and Lee6 noted that fetal distress was preceded by alterations in interbeat intervals before any appreciable change occurred in heart rate itself. Twenty years ago, Sayers7 and others8910 focused attention on the existence of physiological rhythms imbedded in the beat-to-beat heart rate signal. During the 1970s, Ewing et al11 devised a number of simple bedside tests of short-term RR differences to detect autonomic neuropathy in diabetic patients. The association of higher risk of postinfarction mortality with reduced HRV was first shown by Wolf et al12 in 1977. In 1981, Akselrod et al13 introduced power spectral analysis of heart rate fluctuations to quantitatively evaluate beat-to-beat cardiovascular control.

    These frequency domain analyses contributed to the understanding of autonomic background of RR interval fluctuations in the heart rate record.1415 The clinical importance of HRV became appreciated in the late 1980s, when it was confirmed that HRV was a strong and independent predictor of mortality after an acute myocardial infarction.161718 With the availability of new, digital, high-frequency, 24-hour, multichannel ECG recorders, HRV has the potential to provide additional valuable insight into physiological and pathological conditions and to enhance risk stratification.

    Measurement of HRV

    Time Domain Methods

    The variations in heart rate may be evaluated by a number of methods. Perhaps the simplest to perform are the time domain measures. In these methods, either the heart rate at any point in time or the intervals between successive normal complexes are determined. In a continuous ECG record, each QRS complex is detected, and the so-called normal-to-normal (NN) intervals (that is, all intervals between adjacent QRS complexes resulting from sinus node depolarizations) or the instantaneous heart rate is determined. Simple time domain variables that can be calculated include the mean NN interval, the mean heart rate, the difference between the longest and shortest NN interval, the difference between night and day heart rate, and so forth. Other time domain measurements that can be used are variations in instantaneous heart rate secondary to respiration, tilt, Valsalva maneuver, or phenylephrine infusion. These differences can be described as either differences in heart rate or cycle length.

    Statistical Methods

    From a series of instantaneous heart rates or cycle intervals, particularly those recorded over longer periods, traditionally 24 hours, more complex statistical time domain measures can be calculated. These may be divided into two classes: (1) those derived from direct measurements of the NN intervals or instantaneous heart rate and (2) those derived from the differences between NN intervals. These variables may be derived from analysis of the total ECG recording or may be calculated using smaller segments of the recording period. The latter method allows comparison of HRV to be made during varying activities, for example, rest, sleep, and so on.

    The simplest variable to calculate is the standard deviation of the NN intervals (SDNN), that is, the square root of variance. Since variance is mathematically equal to total power of spectral analysis, SDNN reflects all the cyclic components responsible for variability in the period of recording. In many studies SDNN is calculated over a 24-hour period and thus encompasses short-term HF variations as well as the lowest-frequency components seen in a 24-hour period. As the period of monitoring decreases, SDNN estimates shorter and shorter cycle lengths. It also should be noted that the total variance of HRV increases with the length of analyzed recording.19 Thus, on arbitrarily selected ECGs, SDNN is not a well-defined statistical quantity because of its dependence on the length of recording period. In practice, it is inappropriate to compare SDNN measures obtained from recordings of different durations. On the contrary, durations of the recordings used to determine SDNN values (and similarly other HRV measures) should be standardized. As discussed further in this document, short-term 5-minute recordings and nominal 24-hour long-term recordings appear to be appropriate options.

    Other commonly used statistical variables calculated from segments of the total monitoring period include SDANN, the standard deviation of the average NN intervals calculated over short periods, usually 5 minutes, which is an estimate of the changes in heart rate due to cycles longer than 5 minutes, and the SDNN index, the mean of the 5-minute standard deviations of NN intervals calculated over 24 hours, which measures the variability due to cycles shorter than 5 minutes.

    The most commonly used measures derived from interval differences include RMSSD, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals, NN50, the number of interval differences of successive NN intervals greater than 50 ms, and pNN50, the proportion derived by dividing NN50 by the total number of NN intervals. All of these measurements of short-term variation estimate high-frequency variations in heart rate and thus are highly correlated (Fig 1).

    Geometric Methods

    The series of NN intervals also can be converted into a geometric pattern such as the sample density distribution of NN interval durations, sample density distribution of differences between adjacent NN intervals, Lorenz plot of NN or RR intervals, and so forth, and a simple formula is used that judges the variability on the basis of the geometric and/or graphics properties of the resulting pattern. Three general approaches are used in geometric methods: (1) a basic measurement of the geometric pattern (for example, the width of the distribution histogram at the specified level) is converted into the measure of HRV, (2) the geometric pattern is interpolated by a mathematically defined shape (for example, approximation of the distribution histogram by a triangle or approximation of the differential histogram by an exponential curve) and then the parameters of this mathematical shape are used, and (3) the geometric shape is classified into several pattern-based categories that represent different classes of HRV (for example, elliptic, linear, and triangular shapes of Lorenz plots). Most geometric methods require the RR (or NN) interval sequence to be measured on or converted to a discrete scale that is not too fine or too coarse and permits the construction of smoothed histograms. Most experience has been obtained with the length of the bins of approximately 8 ms (precisely 7.8125 ms=1/128 seconds), which corresponds to the precision of current commercial equipment.

    The HRV triangular index measurement is the integral of the density distribution (that is, the number of all NN intervals) divided by the maximum of the density distribution. Using a measurement of NN intervals on a discrete scale, the measure is approximated by the value (total number of NN intervals)/(number of NN intervals in the modal bin), which is dependent on the length of the bin, that is, on the precision of the discrete scale of measurement. Thus, if the discrete approximation of the measure is used with NN interval measurement on a scale different from the most frequent sampling of 128 Hz, the size of the bins should be quoted. The triangular interpolation of NN interval histogram (TINN) is the baseline width of the distribution measured as a base of a triangle approximating the NN interval distribution (the minimum square difference is used to find such a triangle). Details of computing HRV triangular index and TINN are shown in Fig 2. Both these measures express overall HRV measured over 24 hours and are more influenced by the lower than by the higher frequencies.17 Other geometric methods are still in the phase of exploration and explanation.2021

    The major advantage of the geometric methods lies in their relative insensitivity to the analytical quality of the series of NN intervals.22 The major disadvantage of the geometric methods is the need for a reasonable number of NN intervals to construct the geometric pattern. In practice, recordings of at least 20 minutes (but preferably 24 hours) should be used to ensure the correct performance of the geometric methods; that is, the current geometric methods are inappropriate to assess short-term changes in HRV.

    Summary and Recommendations

    The variety of time domain measures of HRV is summarized in Table 1. Since many of the measures correlate closely with others, the following four measures are recommended for time domain HRV assessment (1) SDNN (estimate of overall HRV), (2) HRV triangular index (estimate of overall HRV), (3) SDANN (estimate of long-term components of HRV), and (4) RMSSD (estimate of short-term components of HRV).

    Two estimates of the overall HRV are recommended because the HRV triangular index permits only casual preprocessing of the ECG signal. The RMSSD method is preferred to pNN50 and NN50 because it has better statistical properties.

    The methods expressing overall HRV and its long- and short-term components cannot replace each other. The selection of method used should correspond to the aim of each particular study. Methods that might be recommended for clinical practices are summarized in “Clinical Use of HRV.”

    Distinction should be made between measures derived from direct measurements of NN intervals or instantaneous heart rate and from the differences between NN intervals.

    It is inappropriate to compare time domain measures, especially those expressing overall HRV, obtained from recordings of different durations.

    Other practical recommendations are listed in “Recording Requirements,” together with suggestions related to the frequency analysis of HRV.

    Frequency Domain Methods

    Various spectral methods23 for the analysis of the tachogram have been applied since the late 1960s. Power spectral density (PSD) analysis provides the basic information of how power (variance) distributes as a function of frequency. Independent of the method used, only an estimate of the true PSD of the signal can be obtained by proper mathematical algorithms.

    Methods for the calculation of PSD may be generally classified as nonparametric and parametric. In most instances, both methods provide comparable results. The advantages of the nonparametric methods are (1) the simplicity of the algorithm used (fast Fourier transform [FFT] in most of the cases) and (2) the high processing speed, while the advantages of parametric methods are (1) smoother spectral components that can be distinguished independent of preselected frequency bands, (2) easy postprocessing of the spectrum with an automatic calculation of low- and high-frequency power components with an easy identification of the central frequency of each component, and (3) an accurate estimation of PSD even on a small number of samples on which the signal is supposed to maintain stationarity. The basic disadvantage of parametric methods is the need of verification of the suitability of the chosen model and of its complexity (that is, the order of the model).

    Spectral Components

    Short-term recordings. Three main spectral components are distinguished in a spectrum calculated from short-term recordings of 2 to 5 minutes710131524 : VLF, LF, and HF components. The distribution of the power and the central frequency of LF and HF are not fixed but may vary in relation to changes in autonomic modulations of heart period.152425 The physiological explanation of the VLF component is much less defined, and the existence of a specific physiological process attributable to these heart period changes might even be questioned. The nonharmonic component, which does not have coherent properties and is affected by algorithms of baseline or trend removal, is commonly accepted as a major constituent of VLF. Thus, VLF assessed from short-term recordings (≤5 minutes) is a dubious measure and should be avoided when the PSD of short-term ECGs is interpreted.

    The measurement of VLF, LF, and HF power components is usually made in absolute values of power (milliseconds squared). LF and HF may also be measured in normalized units,1524 which represent the relative value of each power component in proportion to the total power minus the VLF component. The representation of LF and HF in normalized units emphasizes the controlled and balanced behavior of the two branches of the autonomic nervous system. Moreover, the normalization tends to minimize the effect of the changes in total power on the values of LF and HF components (Fig 3). Nevertheless, normalized units should always be quoted with absolute values of the LF and HF power in order to describe completely the distribution of power in spectral components.

    Long-term recordings. Spectral analysis also may be used to analyze the sequence of NN intervals of the entire 24-hour period. The result then includes a ULF component, in addition to VLF, LF, and HF components. The slope of the 24-hour spectrum also can be assessed on a log-log scale by linear fitting the spectral values. Table 2 lists selected frequency domain measures.

    The problem of “stationarity” is frequently discussed with long-term recordings. If mechanisms responsible for heart period modulations of a certain frequency remain unchanged during the whole period of recording, the corresponding frequency component of HRV may be used as a measure of these modulations. If the modulations are not stable, the interpretation of the results of frequency analysis is less well defined. In particular, physiological mechanisms of heart period modulations responsible for LF and HF power components cannot be considered stationary during the 24-hour period.25 Thus, spectral analysis performed on the entire 24-hour period as well as spectral results obtained from shorter segments (5 minutes) averaged over the entire 24-hour period (the LF and HF results of these two computations are not different2627 ) provide averages of the modulations attributable to the LF and HF components (Fig 4). Such averages obscure the detailed information about autonomic modulation of RR intervals that is available in shorter recordings.25 It should be remembered that the components of HRV provide measurement of the degree of autonomic modulations rather than of the level of autonomic tone,28 and averages of modulations do not represent an averaged level of tone.

    Technical Requirements and Recommendations

    Because of the important differences in the interpretation of the results, the spectral analyses of short-term and long-term ECGs should always be strictly distinguished, as reported in Table 2.

    The analyzed ECG signal should satisfy several requirements in order to obtain a reliable spectral estimation. Any departure from the following requirements may lead to unreproducible results that are difficult to interpret.

    To attribute individual spectral components to well-defined physiological mechanisms, such mechanisms modulating the heart rate should not change during the recording. Transient physiological phenomena may perhaps be analyzed by specific methods that currently constitute a challenging research topic but are not yet ready to be used in applied research. To check the stability of the signal in terms of certain spectral components, traditional statistical tests may be used.29

    The sampling rate must be properly chosen. A low sampling rate may produce a jitter in the estimation of the R-wave fiducial point, which alters the spectrum considerably. The optimal range is 250 to 500 Hz or perhaps even higher,30 while a lower sampling rate (in any case ≥100 Hz) may behave satisfactorily only if an algorithm of interpolation (parabolic) is used to refine the R-wave fiducial point.3132

    Baseline and trend removal (if used) may affect the lower components in the spectrum. It is advisable to check the frequency response of the filter or the behavior of the regression algorithm and to verify that the spectral components of interest are not significantly affected.

    The choice of QRS fiducial point may be critical. It is necessary to use a well-tested algorithm (derivative plus threshold, template, correlation method) to locate a stable and noise-independent reference point.33 A fiducial point localized far within the QRS complex may also be influenced by varying ventricular conduction disturbances.

    Ectopic beats, arrhythmic events, missing data, and noise effects may alter the estimation of the PSD of HRV. Proper interpolation (or linear regression or similar algorithms) on preceding/successive beats on the HRV signal or on its autocorrelation function may decrease this error. Preferentially, short-term recordings that are free of ectopy, missing data, and noise should be used. In some circumstances, however, acceptance of only ectopic-free, short-term recordings may introduce significant selection bias. In such cases, proper interpolation should be used and the possibility of the results being influenced by ectopy should be considered.34 The relative number and relative duration of RR intervals that were omitted and interpolated should also be quoted.

    Algorithmic Standards and Recommendations

    The series of data subjected to spectral analysis can be obtained in different ways. A useful pictorial representation of the data is the discrete event series (DES), that is, the plot of RiRi−1 interval versus time (indicated at Ri occurrence), which is an irregularly time-sampled signal. Nevertheless, spectral analysis of the sequence of instantaneous heart rates has also been used in many studies.26

    The spectrum of the HRV signal is generally calculated either from the RR interval tachogram (RR durations versus number of progressive beats; see Fig 5a,b) or by interpolating the DES, thus obtaining a continuous signal as a function of time, or by calculating the spectrum of the counts–unitary pulses as a function of time corresponding to each recognized QRS complex.35 Such a choice may have implications on the morphology, the measurement units of the spectra, and the measurement of the relevant spectral parameters. To standardize the methods used, the use of RR interval tachogram with the parametric method, or the use of the regularly sampled interpolation of DES with the nonparametric method may be suggested; nevertheless, regularly sampled interpolation of DES is also suitable for parametric methods. The sampling frequency of interpolation of DES must be sufficiently high that the Nyquist frequency of the spectrum is not within the frequency range of interest.

    Standards for nonparametric methods (based on the FFT algorithm) should include the values reported in Table 2, the formula of DES interpolation, the frequency of sampling the DES interpolation, the number of samples used for the spectrum calculation, and the spectral window used (Hann, Hamming, and triangular windows are most frequently used).36 The method of calculating the power in respect of the window also should be quoted. In addition to requirements described in other parts of this document, each study using the nonparametric spectral analysis of HRV should quote all these parameters.

    Standards for parametric methods shall include the values reported in Table 2, the type of the model used, the number of samples, the central frequency for each spectral component (LF and HF), and the value of the model order (numbers of parameters). Furthermore, statistical figures must be calculated in order to test the reliability of the model. The prediction error whiteness test (PEWT) provides information about the goodness of the fitting model,37 while the optimal order test (OOT) checks the suitability of the order of the model used.38 There are different possibilities of performing OOT that include final prediction error and Akaike information criteria. The following operative criterion for choosing the order P of an autoregressive model might be proposed: the order shall be in the range of 8 to 20, fulfilling the PEWT test and complying with the OOT test (P≈min[OOT]).

    Correlation and Differences Between Time and Frequency Domain Measures

    In the analysis of stationary short-term recordings, more experience and theoretical knowledge exist on physiological interpretation of the frequency domain measures compared with the time domain measures derived from the same recordings.

    On the contrary, many time and frequency domain variables measured over the entire 24-hour period are strongly correlated with each other (Table 3). These strong correlations exist because of both mathematical and physiological relationships. In addition, the physiological interpretation of the spectral components calculated over 24 hours is difficult, namely because of reasons mentioned above (see “Long-term recordings”). Thus, unless special investigations are performed that use the 24-hour HRV signal to extract information other than the usual frequency components (for example, the log-log slope of spectrogram), the results of the frequency-domain analysis are equivalent to those of the time domain analysis, which is easier to perform.

    Rhythm Pattern Analysis

    As illustrated in Fig 6,39 the time domain and spectral methods share limitations imposed by the irregularity of the RR series. Clearly different profiles analyzed by these techniques may give identical results. Trends of decreasing or increasing cycle length are in reality not symmetric4041 as heart rate accelerations are usually followed by a faster decrease. In spectral results, this tends to reduce the peak at the fundamental frequency and to enlarge its basis. This leads to the idea of measuring blocks of RR intervals determined by properties of the rhythm and investigating the relationship of such blocks without considering the internal variability.

    Approaches derived from the time domain and the frequency domain have been proposed in order to reduce these difficulties. The interval spectrum and spectrum of counts methods lead to equivalent results (Fig 6d) and are well suited to investigate the relationship between HRV and the variability of other physiological measures. The interval spectrum is well adapted to link RR intervals to variables defined on a beat-to-beat basis (blood pressure). The spectrum of counts is preferable if RR intervals are related to a continuous signal (respiration) or to the occurrence of special events (arrhythmia).

    The “peak-valley” procedures are based either on the detection of the summit and the nadir of oscillations4243 or on the detection of trends of heart rate.44 The detection may be limited to short-term changes,42 but it can be extended to longer variations: second- and third-order peaks and troughs43 or stepwise increase of a sequence of consecutive increasing or decreasing cycles surrounded by opposite trends.44 The various oscillations can be characterized on the basis of the heart rate acceleration or slowing, the wavelength, and/or the amplitude. In a majority of short- to mid-term recordings, the results are correlated with frequency components of HRV.45 The correlations, however, tend to diminish as the wavelength of the oscillations and the recording duration increase. Complex demodulation uses the techniques of interpolation and detrending46 and provides the time resolution necessary to detect short-term heart rate changes as well as to describe the amplitude and phase of particular frequency components as functions of time.

    Nonlinear Methods

    Nonlinear phenomena are certainly involved in the genesis of HRV. They are determined by complex interactions of hemodynamic, electrophysiological, and humoral variables as well as by the autonomic and central nervous regulations. It has been speculated that analysis of HRV based on the methods of nonlinear dynamics might elicit valuable information for physiological interpretation of HRV and for the assessment of the risk of sudden death. The parameters that have been used to measure nonlinear properties of HRV include 1/f scaling of Fourier spectra,4719 H scaling exponent, and Coarse Graining Spectral Analysis (CGSA).48 For data representation, Poincaré sections, low-dimension attractor plots, singular value decomposition, and attractor trajectories have been used. For other quantitative descriptions, the D2 correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponents, and Kolmogorov entropy have been used.49

    Although in principle, these techniques have been shown to be powerful tools for characterization of various complex systems, no major breakthrough has yet been achieved by their application to biomedical data including HRV analysis. It is possible that integral complexity measures are not adequate to analyze biological systems and thus are too insensitive to detect the nonlinear perturbations of RR interval, which would be of physiological or practical importance. More encouraging results have been obtained using differential rather than integral complexity measures, for example, the scaling index method.5051 However, no systematic study has been conducted to investigate large patient populations with the use of these methods.

    At present, the nonlinear methods represent potential tools for HRV assessment. Standards are lacking, and the full scope of these methods cannot be assessed. Advances in technology and the interpretation of the results of nonlinear methods are needed before these methods are ready for physiological and clinical studies.

    Stability and Reproducibility of HRV Measurement

    Multiple studies have demonstrated that short-term measures of HRV rapidly return to baseline after transient perturbations induced by such manipulations as mild exercise, administration of short-acting vasodilators, and transient coronary occlusion. More powerful stimuli, such as maximum exercise or administration of long-acting drugs, may result in a much more prolonged interval before return to control values.

    There are far fewer data on the stability of long-term measures of HRV obtained from 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. Nonetheless, the limited data available suggest great stability of HRV measures derived from 24-hour ambulatory monitoring in both normal subjects5253 and in the postinfarction54 and ventricular arrhythmia55 populations. There also exist some fragmentary data to suggest that stability of HRV measures may persist for periods of months and years. Because 24-hour indices appear to be stable and free of placebo effect, they may be ideal variables to assess intervention therapies.

    Recording Requirements

    ECG Signal

    The fiducial point recognized on the ECG tracing that identifies a QRS complex may be based on the maximum or baricentrum of the complex, on the determination of the maximum of an interpolating curve, or found by matching with a template or other event markers. To localize the fiducial point, voluntary standards for diagnostic ECG equipment are satisfactory in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, common mode rejection, bandwidth, and so forth.56 An upper-band frequency cutoff substantially lower than that established for diagnostic equipment (≈200 Hz) may create a jitter in the recognition of the QRS complex fiducial point, introducing an error of measured RR intervals. Similarly, limited sampling rate induces an error in the HRV spectrum that increases with frequency, thus affecting more high-frequency components.31 An interpolation of the undersampled ECG signal may decrease this error. With proper interpolation, even a 100-Hz sampling rate can be sufficient.32

    When solid-state storage recorders are used, data compression techniques must be carefully considered in terms of both the effective sampling rate and the quality of reconstruction methods that may yield amplitude and phase distortion.57

    Duration and Circumstances of ECG Recording

    In studies researching HRV, the duration of recording is dictated by the nature of each investigation. Standardization is needed particularly in studies investigating the physiological and clinical potential of HRV.

    Frequency domain methods should be preferred to the time domain methods when short-term recordings are investigated. The recording should last for at least 10 times the wavelength of the lower frequency bound of the investigated component, and, in order to ensure the stability of the signal, should not be substantially extended. Thus, recording of approximately 1 minute is needed to assess the HF components of HRV, while approximately 2 minutes are needed to address the LF component. To standardize different studies investigating short-term HRV, 5-minute recordings of a stationary system are preferred unless the nature of the study dictates another design.

    Averaging of spectral components obtained from sequential periods of time is able to minimize the error imposed by the analysis of very short segments. Nevertheless, if the nature and degree of physiological heart period modulations changes from one short segment of the recording to another, the physiological interpretation of such averaged spectral components suffers from the same intrinsic problems as that of the spectral analysis of long-term recordings and warrants further elucidation. A display of stacked series of sequential power spectra (for example, over 20 minutes) may help confirm steady state conditions for a given physiological state.

    Although the time domain methods, especially the SDNN and RMSSD methods, can be used to investigate recordings of short durations, the frequency methods are usually able to provide results that are more easily interpretable in terms of physiological regulations. In general, the time domain methods are ideal for the analysis of long-term recordings (the lower stability of heart rate modulations during long-term recordings makes the results of frequency methods less easily interpretable). The experience shows that a substantial part of the long-term HRV value is contributed by the day-night differences. Thus, the long-term recording analyzed by the time domain methods should contain at least 18 hours of analyzable ECG data that include the whole night.

    Little is known about the effects of the environment (type and nature of physical activity and emotional circumstances) during long-term ECG recordings. For some experimental designs, environmental variables should be controlled and in each study, the character of the environment should always be described. The design of investigations also should ensure that the recording environment of individual subjects is similar. In physiological studies comparing HRV in different well-defined groups, the differences between underlying heart rate also should be properly acknowledged.

    Editing of the RR Interval Sequence

    The errors imposed by the imprecision of the NN interval sequence are known to affect substantially the results of statistical time domain and all frequency domain methods. It is known that casual editing of the RR interval data is sufficient for the approximate assessment of total HRV by the geometric methods, but it is not known how precise the editing should be to ensure correct results from other methods. Thus, when the statistical time domain and/or frequency domain methods are used, the manual editing of the RR data should be performed to a very high standard, ensuring correct identification and classification of every QRS complex. Automatic “filters” that exclude some intervals from the original RR sequence (for example, those differing by more than 20% from the previous interval) should not replace manual editing because they are known to behave unsatisfactorily and to have undesirable effects leading potentially to errors.58

    Suggestions for Standardization of Commercial Equipment

    Standard measurement of HRV. Commercial equipment designed to analyze short-term HRV should incorporate nonparametric and preferably also parametric spectral analysis. To minimize the possible confusion imposed by reporting the components of the cardiac beat–based analysis in time frequency components, the analysis based on regular sampling of the tachograms should be offered in all cases. The nonparametric spectral analysis should use at least 512 but preferably 1024 points for 5-minute recordings.

    Equipment designed to analyze HRV in long-term recordings should implement time domain methods, including all four standard measures (SDNN, SDANN, RMSSD, and HRV triangular index). In addition to other options, the frequency analysis should be performed in 5-minute segments (using the same precision as with the analysis of short-term ECGs). When spectral analysis of the total nominal 24-hour record is performed to compute the whole range of HF, LF, VLF, and ULF components, the analysis should be performed with a similar precision of periodogram sampling as suggested for the short-term analysis, for example, using 218 points.

    The strategy of obtaining the data for the HRV analysis should copy the design outlined in Fig 7.

    Precision and testing of commercial equipment. To ensure the quality of different equipment involved in HRV analysis and to find an appropriate balance between the precision essential to research and clinical studies and the cost of the equipment required, independent testing of all equipment is needed. Because the potential errors of the HRV assessment include inaccuracies in the identification of fiducial points of QRS complexes, the testing should include all the recording, replay, and analysis phases. Thus, it seems ideal to test various equipment with signals (that is, computer simulated) of known HRV properties rather than with existing databases of already digitized ECGs. When commercial equipment is used in studies investigating physiological and clinical aspects of HRV, independent tests of the equipment used should always be required. A possible strategy for testing of commercial equipment is proposed in “Appendix B.” Voluntary industrial standards should be developed adopting this or similar strategy.

    Summary and Recommendations

    To minimize the errors caused by improperly designed or incorrectly used techniques, the following points are recommended.

    The ECG equipment used should satisfy the current voluntary industrial standards in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, common mode rejection, bandwidth, and so forth.

    Solid-state recorders used should allow signal reconstruction without amplitude and phase distortion.

    Long-term ECG recorders using analogue magnetic media should accompany the signal with phase-locked time tracking.

    Commercial equipment used to assess HRV should satisfy the technical requirements listed in “Standard measurement of HRV,” and its performance should be independently tested.

    To standardize physiological and clinical studies, two types of recordings should be used whenever possible: (a) short-term recordings of 5 minutes made under physiologically stable conditions processed by frequency domain methods and/or (b) nominal 24-hour recordings processed by time-domain methods.

    When long-term ECGs are used in clinical studies, individual subjects should be recorded under fairly similar conditions and in a fairly similar environment.

    When statistical time domain or frequency domain methods are used, the complete signal should be carefully edited using visual checks and manual corrections of individual RR intervals and QRS complex classifications. Automatic “filters” based on hypotheses on the logic of RR interval sequence (for example, exclusion of RR intervals according to a certain prematurity threshold) should not be relied on when the quality of the RR interval sequence is ensured.

    Physiological Correlates of HRV

    Physiological Correlates of HRV Components

    Autonomic Influences of Heart Rate

    Although cardiac automaticity is intrinsic to various pacemaker tissues, heart rate and rhythm are largely under the control of the autonomic nervous system.59 The parasympathetic influence on heart rate is mediated via release of acetylcholine by the vagus nerve. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors respond to this release mostly by an increase in cell membrane K+ conductance.606162 Acetylcholine also inhibits the hyperpolarization-activated “pacemaker” current If.6364 The “Ik decay” hypothesis65 proposes that pacemaker depolarization results from slow deactivation of the delayed rectifier current, Ik, which, due to a time-independent background inward current, causes diastolic depolarization.6566 Conversely, the “If activation” hypothesis67 suggests that after action potential termination, If provides a slowly activating inward current predominating over decaying Ik, thus initiating slow diastolic depolarization.

    The sympathetic influence on heart rate is mediated by release of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Activation of β-adrenergic receptors results in cAMP-mediated phosphorylation of membrane proteins and increases in ICaL68 and in If.6970 The end result is an acceleration of the slow diastolic depolarization.

    Under resting conditions, vagal tone prevails71 and variations in heart period are largely dependent on vagal modulation.72 The vagal and sympathetic activity constantly interact. Because the sinus node is rich in acetylcholinesterase, the effect of any vagal impulse is brief because the acetylcholine is rapidly hydrolyzed. Parasympathetic influences exceed sympathetic effects probably through two independent mechanisms: (1) a cholinergically induced reduction of norepinephrine released in response to sympathetic activity and (2) a cholinergic attenuation of the response to a adrenergic stimulus.

    Components of HRV

    The RR interval variations present during resting conditions represent a fine tuning of the beat-to-beat control mechanisms.7374 Vagal afferent stimulation leads to reflex excitation of vagal efferent activity and inhibition of sympathetic efferent activity.75 The opposite reflex effects are mediated by the stimulation of sympathetic afferent activity.76 Efferent vagal activity also appears to be under “tonic” restraint by cardiac afferent sympathetic activity.77 Efferent sympathetic and vagal activities directed to the sinus node are characterized by discharge largely synchronous with each cardiac cycle that can be modulated by central (vasomotor and respiratory centers) and peripheral (oscillation in arterial pressure and respiratory movements) oscillators.24 These oscillators generate rhythmic fluctuations in efferent neural discharge that manifest as short- and long-term oscillation in the heart period. Analysis of these rhythms may permit inferences on the state and function of (a) the central oscillators, (b) the sympathetic and vagal efferent activity, (c) humoral factors, and (d) the sinus node.

    An understanding of the modulatory effects of neural mechanisms on the sinus node has been enhanced by spectral analysis of HRV. The efferent vagal activity is a major contributor to the HF component, as seen in clinical and experimental observations of autonomic maneuvers such as electrical vagal stimulation, muscarinic receptor blockade, and vagotomy.131424 More controversial is the interpretation of the LF component, which is considered by some24787980 as a marker of sympathetic modulation (especially when expressed in normalized units) and by others1381 as a parameter that includes both sympathetic and vagal influences. This discrepancy is due to the fact that in some conditions associated with sympathetic excitation, a decrease in the absolute power of the LF component is observed. It is important to recall that during sympathetic activation the resulting tachycardia is usually accompanied by a marked reduction in total power, whereas the reverse occurs during vagal activation. When the spectral components are expressed in absolute units (milliseconds squared), the changes in total power influence LF and HF in the same direction and prevent the appreciation of the fractional distribution of the energy. This explains why in supine subjects under controlled respiration, atropine reduces both LF and HF14 and why during exercise LF is markedly reduced.24 This concept is exemplified in Fig 3, showing the spectral analysis of HRV in a normal subject during control supine conditions and 90° head-up tilt. Because of the reduction in total power, LF appears as unchanged if considered in absolute units. However, after normalization an increase in LF becomes evident. Similar results apply to the LF/HF ratio.82

    Spectral analysis of 24-hour recordings2425 shows that in normal subjects, LF and HF expressed in normalized units exhibit a circadian pattern and reciprocal fluctuations, with higher values of LF in the daytime and of HF at night. These patterns become undetectable when a single spectrum of the entire 24-hour period is used or when spectra of subsequent shorter segments are averaged. In long-term recordings, the HF and LF components account for only approximately 5% of total power. Although the ULF and VLF components account for the remaining 95% of total power, their physiological correlates are still unknown.

    LF and HF can increase under different conditions. An increased LF (expressed in normalized units) is observed during 90° tilt, standing, mental stress, and moderate exercise in healthy subjects, and during moderate hypotension, physical activity, and occlusion of a coronary artery or common carotid arteries in conscious dogs.2479 Conversely, an increase in HF is induced by controlled respiration, cold stimulation of the face, and rotational stimuli.2478

    Summary and Recommendations for Interpretation of HRV Components

    Vagal activity is the major contributor to the HF component.

    Disagreement exists in respect to the LF component. Some studies suggest that LF, when expressed in normalized units, is a quantitative marker of sympathetic modulations; other studies view LF as reflecting both sympathetic activity and vagal activity. Consequently, the LF/HF ratio is considered by some investigators to mirror sympathovagal balance or to reflect the sympathetic modulations.

    Physiological interpretation of lower-frequency components of HRV (that is, of the VLF and ULF components) warrants further elucidation.

    It is important to note that HRV measures fluctuations in autonomic inputs to the heart rather than the mean level of autonomic inputs. Thus, both autonomic withdrawal and saturatingly high level of sympathetic input lead to diminished HRV.28

    Changes of HRV Related to Specific Pathologies

    A reduction of HRV has been reported in several cardiological and noncardiological diseases.24788183

    Myocardial Infarction

    Depressed HRV after MI may reflect a decrease in vagal activity directed to the heart, which leads to prevalence of sympathetic mechanisms and to cardiac electrical instability. In the acute phase of MI, the reduction in 24-hour SDNN is significantly related to left ventricular dysfunction, peak creatine kinase, and Killip class.84

    The mechanism by which HRV is transiently reduced after MI and by which a depressed HRV is predictive of the neural response to acute MI is not yet defined, but it is likely to involve derangements in the neural activity of cardiac origin. One hypothesis85 involves cardiocardiac sympathosympathetic8687 and sympathovagal reflexes75 and suggests that the changes in the geometry of a beating heart due to necrotic and noncontracting segments may abnormally increase the firing of sympathetic afferent fibers by mechanical distortion of the sensory endings.768788 This sympathetic excitation attenuates the activity of vagal fibers directed to the sinus node. Another explanation, especially applicable to marked reduction of HRV, is the reduced responsiveness of sinus nodal cells to neural modulations.8285

    Spectral analysis of HRV in patients surviving an acute MI revealed a reduction in total and in the individual power of spectral components.89 However, when the power of LF and HF was calculated in normalized units, an increased LF and a diminished HF were observed during both resting controlled conditions and 24-hour recordings analyzed over multiple 5-minute periods.9091 These changes may indicate a shift of sympathovagal balance toward a sympathetic predominance and a reduced vagal tone. Similar conclusions were obtained by considering the changes in LF/HF ratio. The presence of an alteration in neural control mechanisms was also reflected by the blunting of the day-night variations of RR interval91 and LF and HF spectral components9192 present in a period ranging from days to a few weeks after the acute event. In post-MI patients with a very depressed HRV, most of the residual energy is distributed in the VLF frequency range below 0.03 Hz, with only a small respiration-related HF.93 These characteristics of the spectral profile are similar to those observed in an advanced cardiac failure or after cardiac transplant and are likely to reflect either a diminished responsiveness of the target organ to neural modulatory inputs82 or a saturating influence on the sinus node of a persistently high sympathetic tone.28

    Diabetic Neuropathy

    In neuropathy associated with diabetes mellitus characterized by alteration of small nerve fibers, a reduction in time domain parameters of HRV seems not only to carry negative prognostic value but also to precede the clinical expression of autonomic neuropathy.94959697 In diabetic patients without evidence of autonomic neuropathy, reduction of the absolute power of LF and HF during controlled conditions was also reported.96 However, when the LF/HF ratio was considered or when LF and HF were analyzed in normalized units, no significant difference in comparison to normal subjects was present. Thus, the initial manifestation of this neuropathy is likely to involve both efferent limbs of the autonomic nervous system.9698

    Cardiac Transplantation

    A very reduced HRV with no definite spectral components was reported in patients with a recent heart transplant.9799100 The appearance of discrete spectral components in a few patients is considered to reflect cardiac reinnervation.101 This reinnervation may occur as early as 1 to 2 years after transplantation and is usually of sympathetic origin. Indeed, the correlation between the respiratory rate and the HF component of HRV observed in some transplanted patients also indicates that a nonneural mechanism may contribute to generate a respiration-related rhythmic oscillation.100 The initial observation of identifying patients developing an allograft rejection according to changes in HRV could be of clinical interest but needs further confirmation.

    Myocardial Dysfunction

    A reduced HRV has been observed consistently in patients with cardiac failure.247881102103104105106 In this condition characterized by signs of sympathetic activation such as faster heart rates and high levels of circulating catecholamines, a relation between changes in HRV and the extent of left ventricular dysfunction was reported.102104 In fact, whereas the reduction in time domain measures of HRV seemed to parallel the severity of the disease, the relationship between spectral components and indices of ventricular dysfunction appears to be more complex. In particular, in most patients with a very advanced phase of the disease and with a drastic reduction in HRV, an LF component could not be detected despite the clinical signs of sympathetic activation. Thus, in conditions characterized by a marked and unopposed persistent sympathetic excitation, the sinus node seems to drastically diminish its responsiveness to neural inputs.104


    Patients with chronic complete high cervical spinal cord lesions have intact efferent vagal and sympathetic neural pathways directed to the sinus node. However, spinal sympathetic neurons are deprived of modulatory control and in particular of baroreflex supraspinal inhibitory inputs. For this reason, these patients represent a unique clinical model to evaluate the contribution of supraspinal mechanisms in determining the sympathetic activity responsible for LF oscillations of HRV. It has been reported107 that no LF could be detected in tetraplegic patients, thus suggesting the critical role of supraspinal mechanisms in determining the 0.1 Hz rhythm. Two recent studies, however, have indicated that an LF component also can be detected in HRV and arterial pressure variabilities of some tetraplegic patients.108109 While Koh et al108 attributed the LF component of HRV to vagal modulations, Guzzetti et al109 attributed the same component to sympathetic activity because of the delay with which the LF component appeared after spinal section, suggesting an emerging spinal rhythmicity capable of modulating sympathetic discharge.

    Modifications of HRV by Specific Interventions

    The rationale for trying to modify HRV after MI stems from the multiple observations indicating that cardiac mortality is higher among those post-MI patients who have a more depressed HRV.93110 The inference is that interventions that augment HRV may be protective against cardiac mortality and sudden cardiac death. Although the rationale for changing HRV is sound, it also contains the inherent danger of leading to the unwarranted assumption that modification of HRV translates directly into cardiac protection, which may not be the case.111 The target is the improvement of cardiac electrical stability, and HRV is just a marker of autonomic activity. Despite the growing consensus that increases in vagal activity can be beneficial,112 it is not as yet known how much vagal activity (or its markers) has to increase in order to provide adequate protection.

    β-Adrenergic Blockade and HRV

    The data on the effect of β-blockers on HRV in post-MI patients are surprisingly scant.113114 Despite the observation of statistically significant increases, the actual changes are very modest. However, it is of note that β-blockade prevents the rise in the LF component observed in the morning hours.114 In conscious post-MI dogs, β-blockers do not modify HRV.115 The unexpected observation that before MI, β-blockade increases HRV only in the animals destined to be at low risk for lethal arrhythmias after MI115 may suggest novel approaches to post-MI risk stratification.

    Antiarrhythmic Drugs and HRV

    Data exist for several antiarrhythmic drugs. Flecainide and propafenone but not amiodarone were reported to decrease time domain measures of HRV in patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmia.116 In another study,117 propafenone reduced HRV and decreased LF much more than HF, resulting in a significantly smaller LF/HF ratio. A larger study118 confirmed that flecainide, also encainide and moricizine, decreased HRV in post-MI patients but found no correlation between the change in HRV and mortality during follow-up. Thus, some antiarrhythmic drugs associated with increased mortality can reduce HRV. However, it is not known whether these changes in HRV have any direct prognostic significance.

    Scopolamine and HRV

    Low-dose muscarinic receptor blockers, such as atropine and scopolamine, may produce a paradoxical increase in vagal efferent activity, as suggested by a decrease in heart rate. Different studies examined the effects of transdermal scopolamine on indices of vagal activity in patients with a recent MI119120121122 and with congestive heart failure.123 Scopolamine markedly increases HRV, which indicates that pharmacological modulation of neural activity with scopolamine may effectively increase vagal activity. However, the efficacy during long-term treatment has not been assessed. Furthermore, low-dose scopolamine does not prevent ventricular fibrillation caused by acute myocardial ischemia in post-MI dogs.124

    Thrombolysis and HRV

    The effect of thrombolysis on HRV (assessed by pNN50) was reported in 95 patients with acute MI.125 HRV was higher 90 minutes after thrombolysis in the patients with patency of the infarct-related artery. However, this difference was no longer evident when the entire 24 hours were analyzed.

    Exercise Training and HRV

    Exercise training may decrease cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death.126 Regular exercise training is also thought capable of modifying the autonomic balance.127128 A recent experimental study designed to assess the effects of exercise training on markers of vagal activity has simultaneously provided information on changes in cardiac electrical stability.129 Conscious dogs documented to be at high risk by the previous occurrence of ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial ischemia were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of either daily exercise training or cage rest followed by exercise training.129 After training, HRV (SDNN) increased by 74%, and all animals survived a new ischemic test. Exercise training can also accelerate recovery of the physiological sympathovagal interaction, as shown in post-MI patients.130

    Clinical Use of HRV

    Although HRV has been the subject of numerous clinical studies investigating a wide spectrum of cardiological and noncardiological diseases and clinical conditions, a general consensus of the practical use of HRV in adult medicine has been reached only in two clinical scenarios. Depressed HRV can be used as a predictor of risk after acute MI and as an early warning sign of diabetic neuropathy.

    Assessment of Risk After Acute MI

    The observation12 that in patients with an acute MI the absence of respiratory sinus arrhythmias is associated with an increase in “in-hospital” mortality represents the first of a large number of reports1693131 that have demonstrated the prognostic value of assessing HRV to identify high-risk patients.

    Depressed HRV is a powerful predictor of mortality and of arrhythmic complications (for example, symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia) in patients after acute MI16131 (Fig 8). The predictive value of HRV is independent of other factors established for postinfarction risk stratification, such as depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, increased ventricular ectopic activity, and presence of late potentials. For prediction of all-cause mortality, the value of HRV is similar to that of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, HRV is superior to left ventricular ejection fraction in predicting arrhythmic events (sudden cardiac death and ventricular tachycardia).131 This permits speculation that HRV is a stronger predictor of arrhythmic mortality rather than nonarrhythmic mortality. However, clear differences between HRV in patients suffering from sudden and nonsudden cardiac death after acute MI have not been observed. Nevertheless, this also might be related to the nature of the presently used definition of sudden cardiac death,132 which is bound to include not only patients suffering arrhythmia-related death but also fatal reinfarctions and other cardiovascular events.

    The value of both conventional time domain and frequency domain parameters has been fully assessed in several independent prospective studies. Because of using optimized cutoff values defining normal and depressed HRV, these studies may slightly overestimate the predictive value of HRV. Nevertheless, the confidence intervals of such cutoff values are rather narrow because of the sizes of investigated populations. Thus, the observed cutoff values of 24-hour measures of HRV, that is, SDNN <50 ms and HRV triangular index <15 for highly depressed HRV, or SDNN <100 ms and HRV triangular index <20 for moderately depressed HRV, are likely to be broadly applicable.

    It is not known whether different indices of HRV (assessments of the short- and long-term components) can be combined in a multivariate fashion in order to improve postinfarction risk stratification. There is a general consensus, however, that combination of other measures with the assessment of overall 24-hour HRV is probably redundant.

    Pathophysiological Considerations

    It has not been established whether depressed HRV is part of the mechanism of increased postinfarction mortality or is merely a marker of poor prognosis. The data suggest that depressed HRV is not a simple reflection of sympathetic overdrive and/or vagal withdrawal due to poor ventricular performance but that it also reflects depressed vagal activity, which has a strong association with the pathogenesis of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.112

    Assessment of HRV for Risk Stratification After Acute MI

    Traditionally, HRV used for risk stratification after MI has been assessed from 24-hour recordings. HRV measured from short-term ECG recordings also provides prognostic information for risk stratification after MI but whether it is as powerful as that from 24-hour recordings is uncertain.133134135 HRV measured from short-term recordings is depressed in patients at high risk; the predictive value of depressed HRV increases with increased length of recording. Thus, the use of nominal 24-hour recordings may be recommended for risk stratification studies after MI. On the other hand, the assessment of HRV from short-term recordings can be used for initial screening of survivors of acute MI.136 Such an assessment has similar sensitivity but lower specificity for predicting patients at high risk compared with 24-hour HRV.

    Spectral analysis of HRV in survivors of MI suggested that the ULF and VLF components carry the highest predictive value.93 Because the physiological correlate of these components is unknown and because these components correspond to up to 95% of the total power, which can be easily assessed in the time domain, the use of individual spectral components of HRV for risk stratification after MI is not more powerful than the use of those time domain methods that assess overall HRV.

    Development of HRV After Acute MI

    The time after acute MI at which the depressed HRV reaches the highest predictive value has not been investigated comprehensively. Nevertheless, the general consensus is that HRV should be assessed shortly before hospital discharge, that is, approximately 1 week after index infarction. Such a recommendation also fits well into the common practice of hospital management of survivors of acute MI.

    HRV is decreased early after acute MI and begins to recover within a few weeks; it is maximally but not fully recovered by 6 to 12 months after MI.91137 Assessment of HRV at both the early stage of MI (2 to 3 days after acute MI)84 and before discharge from the hospital (1 to 3 weeks after acute MI) offers important prognostic information. HRV measured late (1 year) after acute MI also predicts further mortality.138 Data from animal models suggest that the speed of HRV recovery after MI correlates with subsequent risk.115

    HRV Used for Multivariate Risk Stratification

    The predictive value of HRV alone is modest. Combination with other techniques substantially improves the positive predictive accuracy of HRV over a clinically important range of sensitivity (25% to 75%) for cardiac mortality and arrhythmic events (Fig 9).

    Improvements of the positive predictive accuracy over the range of sensitivities have been reported for combinations of HRV with mean heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, frequency of ventricular ectopic activity, parameters of high resolution ECGs (presence or absence of late potentials), and clinical assessment.139 However, it is not known which other stratification factors are the most practical and most feasible to be combined with HRV for multifactorial risk stratification.

    Systematic multivariate studies of post-MI risk stratification are needed before a consensus can be reached and before it can be recommended how to combine HRV with other variables of proven prognostic importance. Many aspects that are not relevant for a univariate risk stratification need to be examined: It is not obvious whether the optimum cutoff values of individual risk factors known from univariate studies are appropriate in a multivariate setting. Different multivariate combinations are probably needed for optimizing predictive accuracy at different ranges of sensitivity. Stepwise strategies should be examined to identify optimum sequences of performing individual tests used in multivariate stratification.

    Summary and Recommendations for Interpreting Predictive Value of Depressed HRV After Acute MI

    The following facts should be noted when HRV assessment is exploited in clinical studies and/or trials involving survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

    Depressed HRV is a predictor of mortality and arrhythmic complications that is independent of other recognized risk factors.

    There is a general consensus that HRV should be measured approximately 1 week after index infarction.

    Although HRV assessed from short-term recordings provides prognostic information, HRV measured in nominal 24-hour recordings is a stronger risk predictor. HRV assessed from short-term recordings may be used for initial screening of all survivors of an acute MI.

    No currently recognized HRV measure provides better prognostic information than the time domain HRV measures assessing overall HRV (SDNN or HRV triangular index). Some other measures, for example, ULF of entire 24-hour spectral analysis, perform equally well. A high-risk group may be selected by the dichotomy limits of SDNN <50 ms or HRV triangular index <15.

    For clinically meaningful ranges of sensitivity, the predictive value of HRV alone is modest, although it is higher than that of any other recognized risk factor. To improve the predictive value, HRV may be combined with other factors. However, an optimum set of risk factors and corresponding dichotomy limits have not yet been established.

    Assessment of Diabetic Neuropathy

    As a complication of diabetes mellitus, autonomic neuropathy is characterized by early and widespread neuronal degeneration of small nerve fibers of both sympathetic and parasympathetic tracts.140 Its clinical manifestations are ubiquitous with functional impairment and include postural hypotension, persistent tachycardia, gustatory sweating, gastroparesis, bladder atony, and nocturnal diarrhea. Once clinical manifestations of diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) supervene, the estimated 5-year mortality is approximately 50%.141 Thus, early subclinical detection of autonomic dysfunction is important for risk stratification and subsequent management. Analyses of short-term and/or long-term HRV have been proven useful in detecting DAN.96142143144145146147

    For the patient presenting with a real or suspected DAN, there are three HRV methods from which to choose: (1) simple bedside RR interval methods, (2) long-term time domain measures that are more sensitive and more reproducible than the short-term tests, and (3) frequency domain analysis performed under short-term steady state conditions, which is useful in separating sympathetic from parasympathetic abnormalities.

    Long-term Time Domain Measures

    HRV computed from 24-hour Holter records are more sensitive than simple bedside tests (Valsava maneuver, orthostatic test, and deep breathing11 ) for detecting DAN. Most experience has been obtained with the NN50144 and SDSD (see Table 1)145 methods. When the NN50 count is used, where the lower 95% confidence interval for total counts range from 500 to 2000, depending on the age, about half of diabetic patients demonstrate abnormally low counts per 24 hours. Moreover, there is a strong correlation between the percentage of patients with abnormal counts and the extent of autonomic neuropathy determined from conventional measures.

    Besides their increased sensitivity, these 24-hour time domain methods are strongly correlated with other established HRV measurements and have been found to be reproducible and stable over time. Similar to survivors of MI, patients with DAN are also predisposed to poor outcomes such as sudden death, but it remains to be determined whether the HRV measures confer prognostic information among diabetics.

    Frequency Domain Measures

    The following abnormalities in frequency HRV analysis are associated with DAN: (1) reduced power in all spectral bands, which is the most common finding,96146147148 (2) failure to increase LF on standing, which is a reflection of impaired sympathetic response or depressed baroreceptor sensitivity,96147 (3) abnormally reduced total power with unchanged LF/HF ratio,96 and (4) a leftward shift in the LF central frequency, the physiological meaning of which needs further elucidation.147

    In advanced neuropathic states, the resting supine power spectrum often reveals extremely low amplitudes of all spectral components, making it difficult to separate signal from noise.96146147 It is therefore recommended that an intervention such as standing or tilt be included. Another method to overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio is to introduce a coherence function that utilizes the total power coherent with one or the other frequency band.146

    Other Clinical Potential

    Selected studies investigating HRV in other cardiological diseases are listed in Table 4.100102104110149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167

    Future Possibilities

    Development of HRV Measurement

    The currently available time domain methods predominantly used to assess long-term profile of HRV probably are sufficient for this purpose. Their improvements are possible, especially in terms of numerical robustness. The contemporary nonparametric and parametric spectral methods probably are sufficient to analyze short-term ECGs without transient changes of heart period modulations.

    Apart from the need to develop numerically robust techniques suitable for fully automatic measurement (the geometric methods are only one possibility in this direction), the following three areas deserve attention.

    Dynamics and Transient Changes of HRV

    The present possibilities of characterizing and quantifying the dynamics of the RR interval sequence and transient changes of HRV are sparse and still under mathematical development. Moreover, it is plausible to assume that proper assessment of HRV dynamics will lead to substantial improvement in our understanding of both the modulations of heart period and their physiological and pathophysiological correlates.

    It remains to be seen whether the methods of nonlinear dynamics will be most appropriate for the measurement of transient changes of RR intervals or whether new mathematical models and algorithmic concepts will be needed to tailor the principles of measurement more closely to the physiological nature of cardiac periodograms. In any case, the task of assessing transient changes in HRV seems to be more important than further refinements of the current technology used to analyze stable stages of heart period modulations.

    PP and PR Intervals

    Little is known about the interplay between the PP and PR autonomic modulations. For these reasons, the sequence of PP intervals also should be studied.168 Unfortunately, a precise location of a P-wave fiducial point is almost impossible to achieve in surface ECGs recorded with the current technology. However, developments in the technology should allow PP interval and PR interval variability to be investigated in future studies.

    Multisignal Analysis

    The modulations of heart periods are naturally not the only manifestation of the autonomic regulatory mechanisms. Currently, commercial or semicommercial equipment exists that enables simultaneous recording of ECG, respiration, blood pressure, and so forth. However, despite the ease with which the signals can be recorded, no widely accepted method exists for comprehensive multisignal analysis. Each signal can be analyzed separately, for example, with parametric spectral methods, and the results of the analysis compared. Analysis of coupling between physiological signals allows the properties of the coupling to be measured.169170171172173174

    Studies Needed to Improve Physiological Understanding

    Efforts should be made to find the physiological correlates and the biological relevance of various HRV measures currently used. In some cases, for example, the HF component, this has been achieved. In other cases, for example, the VLF and ULF components, the physiological correlates are still largely unknown.

    This uncertain knowledge limits the interpretation of associations between these variables and the risk of cardiac events. The use of markers of autonomic activity is very attractive. However, unless a tenable mechanistic link between these variables and cardiac events is found, there is an inherent danger of concentrating therapeutic efforts on the modification of these markers.111112 This may lead to incorrect assumptions and serious misinterpretations.

    Possibilities of Future Clinical Utility

    Normal Standards

    Large prospective population studies with longitudinal follow-up are needed to establish normal HRV standards for various age and sex subsets.110 Recently, investigators from the Framingham Heart Study reported on the time and frequency domain measures of HRV in 736 elderly subjects and the relationship of these HRV measures to all-cause mortality during 4 years of follow-up.175 These investigators concluded that HRV offers prognostic information independent of and beyond that provided by traditional risk factors. Additional population-based HRV studies involving the full age spectrum in male and female subjects need to be performed.

    Physiological Phenomena

    It would be of interest to evaluate HRV in various circadian patterns such as normal day-night cycles, sustained reversed day-night cycles (evening-night shift work), and transiently altered day-night cycles such as might occur with international travel. The autonomic fluctuations occurring during various stages of sleep including rapid eye movement (REM) sleep have been studied in only a few subjects. In normal subjects, the HF vagal component of the power spectrum is augmented only during non-REM sleep, whereas in post-MI patients, this increase in HF is absent.176

    The autonomic nervous system response to athletic training and rehabilitative exercise programs after various disease states is thought to be a conditioning phenomenon. HRV data should be useful in understanding the chronological aspects of training and the time to optimal conditioning as it relates to the autonomic influences on the heart. Also, HRV may provide important information about deconditioning with prolonged bed rest and with weightlessness and zero gravity that accompany space flight.

    Pharmacological Responses

    Many medications act directly or indirectly on the autonomic nervous system, and HRV can be used to explore the influence of various agents on sympathetic activity and parasympathetic activity. It is known that parasympathetic blockade with full-dose atropine produces marked diminution of HRV. Low-dose scopolamine has vagotonic influences and is associated with increased HRV, especially in the HF range. β-Adrenergic blockade was observed to increase HRV and to reduce the normalized units of the LF component.15 Considerably more research is needed to understand the effects and clinical relevance of altered vagotonic and adrenergic tone on total HRV power and its various components in health and disease.

    At present, few data exist on the effects of calcium channel blockers, sedatives, anxiolytics, analgesics, anesthetics, antiarrhythmic agents, narcotics, and chemotherapeutic agents such as vincristine and doxorubicin on HRV.

    Risk Stratification

    Both time and frequency measures of HRV calculated from long 24-hour and short 2- to 15-minute ECG recordings have been used to predict time to death after MI as well as the risk of all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death in patients with structural heart disease162163177 and a number of other pathophysiological conditions.177 With diagnostic instruments that can measure HRV together with the frequency and complexity of ventricular arrhythmias, signal-averaged ECG, ST-segment variability, and repolarization heterogeneity, it should be possible to markedly improve the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death and arrhythmic events. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of combined testing.

    Fetal and neonatal HRV is an important area of investigation, and it might provide early information about fetal and neonatal distress and identify those at risk for sudden infant death syndrome. Most of the preliminary work in this field was carried out in the early 1980s before the more sophisticated power spectral techniques became available. Insight into autonomic maturation in the developing fetus also might be possible through the proper application of these techniques.

    Disease Mechanisms

    A fertile area of research is the use of HRV techniques to explore the role of autonomic nervous system alterations in disease mechanisms, especially those conditions in which sympathovagal factors are thought to play an important role. Recent work suggests that alterations in autonomic innervation to the developing heart might be responsible for some forms of long QT syndrome.178 Fetal HRV studies in pregnant mothers with this disorder is certainly feasible and might be very informative.179

    The role of the autonomic nervous system in essential hypertension is an important area of investigation.180 The question regarding the primary or secondary role of enhanced sympathetic activity in essential hypertension might be answered by longitudinal studies of subjects who are initially normotensive. Does essential hypertension result from augmented sympathetic activity with altered responsiveness of neural regulatory mechanisms?

    Several primary neurological disorders including Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and orthostatic hypotension of the Shy-Drager type are associated with altered autonomic function. In some of these disorders, changes in HRV may be an early manifestation of the condition and may be useful in quantitating the rate of disease progression and/or the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. This same approach may also be useful in the evaluation of secondary autonomic neurological disorders that accompany diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, and spinal cord injuries.


    HRV has considerable potential to assess the role of autonomic nervous system fluctuations in normal healthy individuals and in patients with various cardiovascular and noncardiovascular disorders. HRV studies should enhance our understanding of physiological phenomena, the actions of medications, and disease mechanisms. Large prospective longitudinal studies are needed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of HRV in the identification of individuals at risk for subsequent morbid and mortal events.

    Appendix A

    Normal Values of Standard Measures of HRV

    As no comprehensive investigations of all HRV indices in large normal populations have yet been performed, some of the normal values listed in the following table were obtained from studies involving small numbers of subjects. The values should therefore be considered as approximate and no definite clinical conclusions should be based on them. The adjustment of normal limits for age, sex, and environment, which is also needed, has been omitted here because of the limited sources of data.

    Table 5 lists only values of those measures of HRV that might be suggested for standardization of further physiological and clinical studies.181

    Appendix B

    Suggestion of Procedures for Testing of Commercial Equipment Designed to Measure HRV


    To achieve comparable accuracy of measurements reported by different commercial equipment, each device should be tested independently of the manufacturer (for example, by an academic institution). Each test should involve several short-term and, if applicable, long-term test recordings with precisely known HRV parameters and with different morphological characteristics of the ECG signal. If the involvement of the manufacturer is required during the testing procedure (for example, for manual editing of the labels of QRS complexes), the manufacturer must be blinded in respect of both the true HRV parameters of the testing recordings and the features used to obtain the signal. In particular, when the results of the test are disclosed to the manufacturer for further improvement of the device or otherwise, new tests should involve a completely new set of test recordings.

    Technical Requirements

    Each device should be tested comprehensively, including all its parts. In particular, the test should involve both the recording and the analytical part of the device. An appropriate technology should be used to record a fully reproducible signal with precisely known HRV parameters, that is, the test signal should be computer and/or hardware generated. Both brand new recorders as well as recorders that have been routinely used and routinely serviced for approximately half of their lifetime should be used in the tests if this is feasible (the testing should not be delayed for newly introduced systems). If a manufacturer claims that the device is capable of analyzing ECG records (such as Holter tapes) obtained with recorders of other manufacturers, each combination should be tested independently.

    Since the analysis of HRV by implantable devices may be foreseen, similar procedures as described further should be used to generate simulated intracardiac signals. If feasible, implantable devices with fully charged batteries as well as devices with partly discharged batteries should be tested.

    Test Recordings

    It is intrinsically difficult to know precisely the HRV parameters of any real ECG recordings independently of equipment used to analyze the recording. Therefore, simulated ECG signals are preferable. However, the morphology of such simulated ECG signals as well as the HRV characteristics must closely reflect the morphology of real recordings. The discrete frequency used to generate such signals must be substantially higher than the sampling frequency of the tested device. Features that should be introduced into such recordings should include different factors known to influence or potentially influence the precision of HRV assessment, for example, variable noise levels, variable morphology of QRS signals that may cause jitter of the fiducial point, randomly alternating noise in different channels of the signal, gradual and abrupt changes of HRV characteristics, and different frequencies of atrial and ventricular ectopic beats with realistic morphologies of the signal.

    The quality of records on magnetic tape–based systems may not be constant during long-term recording due to spool torque control, back tension, and other factors. Performance of all recorders can be influenced by changes of the outside environment. Long-term (full 24-hour test) rather than short-term tests therefore should be used.

    Testing Procedures

    Each device or each configuration of the device should be tested with several different recordings having different mixtures of features and different HRV characteristics. For each test record and for each selected portion of the test record, the HRV parameters obtained from the commercial device should be compared with the known characteristics of the initial signal. Any discrepancies found should be itemized in respect to features introduced into the recording, for example, errors caused by increased noise, errors caused by fiducial point wander, and so forth. Systematic bias introduced by the equipment as well as its relative errors should be established.

    Reporting the Results

    A technical report of the testing should be prepared solely at the testing site independent of the manufacturer(s) of the tested device.

    Appendix C

    The Task Force was established by the Board of the European Society of Cardiology and cosponsored by the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. It was organized jointly by the Working Groups on Arrhythmias and on Computers of Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. After exchanges of written views on the subject, the main meeting of a writing core of the Task Force took place May 8 through 10, 1994, on Necker Island, British Virgin Islands. After external reviews, the text of this report was approved by the Board of the European Society of Cardiology on August 19, 1995, and by the Board of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology on October 3, 1995.

    Members of the Task Force

    The Task Force was composed of 17 members: Cochairmen: A. John Camm, London, UK; Marek Malik, London, UK; Members: J. Thomas Bigger, Jr, New York, NY; Günter Breithardt, Münster, Germany; Sergio Cerutti, Milano, Italy; Richard J. Cohen, Cambridge, Mass; Philippe Coumel, Paris, France; Ernest L. Fallen, Hamilton, Canada; Harold L. Kennedy, St Louis, Mo; Robert E. Kleiger, St Louis, Mo; Federico Lombardi, Milano, Italy; Alberto Malliani, Milano, Italy; Arthur J. Moss, Rochester, NY; Jeffrey N. Rottman, St Louis, Mo; Georg Schmidt, München, Germany; Peter J. Schwartz, Pavia, Italy; and Donald H. Singer, Chicago, Ill.

    While the text of this report was contributed to and approved by all members of the Task Force, the structure of the text was designed by the Writing Committee of the Task Force, composed of the following members: Marek Malik (Chairman), J. Thomas Bigger, A. John Camm, Robert E. Kleiger, Alberto Malliani, Arthur J. Moss, and Peter J. Schwartz.

    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

    HF=high frequency
    HRV=heart rate variability
    LF=low frequency
    MI=myocardial infarction
    ULF=ultra low frequency
    VLF=very low frequency

    1Membership of the Task Force is listed in “Appendix C.”

          Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Relationship between the RMSSD and pNN50 (a) and pNN50 and NN50 (b) measures of HRV assessed from 857 nominal 24-hour Holter tapes recorded in survivors of acute myocardial infarction before hospital discharge. The NN50 measure used in b was normalized in respect to the length of the recording (data of St George’s Post-infarction Research Survey Programme). Also see Table 1.

          Figure 2.

    Figure 2. To perform geometric measures on the NN interval histogram, the sample density distribution D is constructed, which assigns the number of equally long NN intervals to each value of their lengths. The most frequent NN interval length X is established, that is, Y=D(X) is the maximum of the sample density distribution D. The HRV triangular index is the value obtained by dividing the area integral of D by the maximum Y. When the distribution D with a discrete scale is constructed on the horizontal axis, the value is obtained according to the formula HRV index=(total number of all NN intervals)/Y. For the computation of the TINN measure, the values N and M are established on the time axis and a multilinear function q constructed such that q(t)=0 for t≤N and t≥M and q(X)=Y, and such that the integral ∫0+∞ (D(t)−q(t))2 dt is the minimum among all selections of all values N and M. The TINN measure is expressed in milliseconds and given by the formula TINN=M−N. Also see Table 1.

          Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Spectral analysis (autoregressive model, order 12) of RR interval variability in a healthy subject at rest and during 90° head-up tilt. At rest, two major components of similar power are detectable at low and high frequencies. During tilt, the LF component becomes dominant, but as total variance is reduced, the absolute power of LF appears unchanged compared with rest. Normalization procedure leads to predominant LF and smaller HF components, which express the alteration of spectral components due to tilt. Pie charts show the relative distribution together with the absolute power of the two components represented by the area. During rest, the total variance of the spectrum was 1201 ms2, and its VLF, LF, and HF components were 586 ms2, 310 ms2, and 302 ms2, respectively. Expressed in normalized units (nu), the LF and HF were 48.95 and 47.78 nu, respectively. The LF/HF ratio was 1.02. During tilt, the total variance was 671 ms2, and its VLF, LF, and HF components were 265 ms2, 308 ms2, and 95 ms2, respectively. The LF and HF were 75.96 and 23.48 nu, respectively. The LF/HF ratio was 3.34. Thus, note that for instance, the absolute power of the LF component was slightly decreased during tilt while the normalized units of LF were substantially increased.

          Figure 4.

    Figure 4. Example of an estimate of power spectral density obtained from the entire 24-hour interval of a long-term Holter recording. Only the LF and HF components correspond to peaks of the spectrum, while the VLF and ULF can be approximated by a line in this plot with logarithmic scales on both axes. The slope of such a line is the α measure of HRV.

          Figure 5.

    Figure 5. Interval tachogram of 256 consecutive RR values in a normal subject at supine rest (a) and after head-up tilt (b). The HRV spectra are shown, calculated by parametric autoregressive modeling (c and d) and by a fast Fourier transform–based nonparametric algorithm (e and f). Mean values (m), variances (s2), and the number (N) of samples are indicated. For c and d, VLF, LF, and HF central frequency, power in absolute value and power in normalized units (n.u.) are also indicated together with the order p of the chosen model and minimal values of the prediction error whiteness test (PEWT) and optimal order test (OOT) that satisfy the tests. In e and f, the peak frequency and the power of VLF, LF, and HF were calculated by integrating the power spectral density (PSD) in the defined frequency bands. The window type is also specified. In c through f, the LF component is indicated by dark shaded areas and the HF component by light shaded areas.

          Figure 6.

    Figure 6. Example of four synthesized time series with identical means, standard deviations, and ranges. Series (c) and (d) also have identical autocorrelation functions and therefore identical power spectra. Reprinted with permission.39

          Figure 7.

    Figure 7. Flow chart summarizing individual steps used when recording and processing the ECG signal in order to obtain data for HRV analysis.

          Figure 8.

    Figure 8. Cumulative survival of patients after MI. a, Survival of patients stratified according to 24-hour SDNN values into three groups with cutoff points of 50 and 100 ms (reprinted with permission16 ). b, Similar survival curves of patients stratified according to 24-hour HRV triangular index values with cutoff points of 15 and 20 units, respectively (data of St George’s Post-infarction Research Survey Programme). Also see Table 1.

          Figure 9.

    Figure 9. Comparison of positive predictive characteristics of HRV (solid lines) and of combinations of HRV with left ventricular ejection fraction (dashed lines) and of HRV with left ventricular ejection fraction and ectopic counts on 24-hour ECGs (dotted lines) used for identification of patients at risk of 1-year cardiac mortality (a) and 1-year arrhythmic events (sudden death and/or symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia, b) after acute myocardial infarction (data of St George’s Post-infarction Research Survey Programme).

    Table 1. Selected Time Domain Measures of HRV

    Statistical Measures
    SDNNmsStandard deviation of all NN intervals
    SDANNmsStandard deviation of the averages of NN intervals in all 5-minute segments of the entire recording
    RMSSDmsThe square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals
    SDNN indexmsMean of the standard deviations of all NN intervals for all 5-minute segments of the entire recording
    SDSDmsStandard deviation of differences between adjacent NN intervals
    NN50 countNumber of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording; three variants are possible counting all such NN intervals pairs or only pairs in which the first or the second interval is longer
    pNN50%NN50 count divided by the total number of all NN intervals
    Geometric Measures
    HRV triangular indexTotal number of all NN intervals divided by the height of the histogram of all NN intervals measured on a discrete scale with bins of 7.8125 ms (1/128 seconds) (details in Fig 2)
    TINNmsBaseline width of the minimum square difference triangular interpolation of the highest peak of the histogram of all NN intervals (details in Fig 2)
    Differential indexmsDifference between the widths of the histogram of differences between adjacent NN intervals measured at selected heights (eg, at the levels of 1000 and 10 000 samples)20
    Logarithmic indexCoefficient φ of the negative exponential curve k · e−φt, which is the best approximation of the histogram of absolute differences between adjacent NN intervals21

    Table 2. Selected Frequency Domain Measures of HRV

    VariableUnitsDescriptionFrequency Range
    Analysis of Short-term Recordings (5 min)
    5-min total powerms2The variance of NN intervals over the temporal segment≈≤0.4 Hz
    VLFms2Power in VLF range≤0.04 Hz
    LFms2Power in LF range0.04-0.15 Hz
    LF normnuLF power in normalized units LF/(total power−VLF)×100
    HFms2Power in HF range0.15-0.4 Hz
    HF normnuHF power in normalized units HF/(total power−VLF)×100
    LF/HFRatio LF [ms2]/HF[ms2]
    Analysis of Entire 24 Hours
    Total powerms2Variance of all NN intervals≈≤0.4 Hz
    ULFms2Power in the ULF range≤0.003 Hz
    VLFms2Power in the VLF range0.003-0.04 Hz
    LFms2Power in the LF range0.04-0.15 Hz
    HFms2Power in the HF range0.15-0.4 Hz
    αSlope of the linear interpolation of the spectrum in a log-log scale≈≤0.04 Hz

    Table 3. Approximate Correspondence of Time Domain and Frequency Domain Methods Applied to 24-Hour ECG Recordings

    Time Domain VariableApproximate Frequency Domain Correlate
    SDNNTotal power
    HRV triangular indexTotal power
    TINNTotal power
    SDNN indexMean of 5-minute total power
    NN50 countHF
    Differential indexHF
    Logarithmic indexHF

    See Table 1 for explanation of time domain variables.

    Table 4. Summary of Selected Studies Investigating Clinical Value of HRV in Cardiological Diseases Other Than Myocardial Infarction

    Disease StateAuthor of StudyPopulation (No. of Patients)Investigation ParameterClinical FindingPotential Value
    HypertensionGuzzetti et al, 199114949 hypertensive 30 normalsSpectral AR⇑LF found in hypertensives compared with normals with blunting of circadian patternsHypertension is characterized by a depressed circadian rhythmicity of LF
    Langewitz et al, 199415041 borderline hypertensive 34 hypertensive 54 normalsSpectral FFTReduced parasympathetic in hypertensive patientsSupport the use of nonpathological therapy of hypertension that ⇑ vagal tone (eg, exercise)
    CHFSaul et al, 198815125 chronic CHF NYHA III,IV 21 normalsSpectral Blackman-Tukey 15-min acquisition⇓Spectral power all frequencies, especially >0.04 Hz in CHF patientsIn CHF, there is ⇓ vagal but relatively preserved sympathetic modulation of HR
    Casolo et al, 198910220 CHF NYHA II,III,IV 20 normalsTime domain RR interval histogram with 24-h HolterLow HRVReduced vagal activity in CHF patients
    Binkley et al, 199115210 dilated cardiomyopathy (EF 14% to 40%) 10 normalsSpectral FFT 4-min supine acquisition⇓HF power (>0.1 Hz) in CHF ⇑LF/HFWithdrawal of parasympathetic tone observed in CHF. CHF has imbalance of autonomic tone with ⇓ parasympathetic and a predominance of sympathetic tone
    Kienzle et al, 199210423 CHF NYHA II,III,IVSpectral FFT Time domain 24-48-h HolterAlterations of HRV not tightly linked to severity of CHF ⇓HRV was related to sympathetic excitation
    Townend et al, 199215312 CHF NYHA III,IVTime domain 24-h HolterHRV⇑ during ACE inhibitor treatment
    Binkley et al, 199315413 CHF NYHA II,IIISpectral FFT 4-min supine acquisition12 weeks of ACE inhibitor treatment ⇑HF HRVSignificant augmentation of parasympathetic tone was associated with ACE inhibitor therapy
    Woo et al, 199415521 CHF NYHA IIIPoincaré plots Time domain 24-h HolterComplex plots are associated with ⇑norepinephrine levels and greater sympathetic activationPoincaré plots may assist analysis of sympathetic influences
    Heart transplantationAlexopoulos et al, 198815619 transplant 10 normalsTime domain 24-h HolterReduced HRV in denervated donor hearts; recipient innervated hearts had more HRV
    Sands et al, 198910017 transplant 6 normalsSpectral FFT 15-min supine acquisitionHRV from 0.02 to 1.0 Hz; 90% reducedPatients with rejection documented biopsy show significantly more variability
    Chronic mitral regurgitationStein et al, 199315738 chronic mitral regurgitationSpectral FFT Time domain 24-h HolterHR and measures of ULF by SDANN correlated with ventricular performance and predicted clinical eventsMay be prognostic indicator of atrial fibrillation, mortality, and progression to valve surgery
    Mitral valve prolapseMarangoni et al, 199315839 female mitral valve prolapse 24 female controlsSpectral AR 10-min supine acquisitionMVP patients had ⇓HFMVP patients had low vagal tone
    CardiomyopathiesCounihan et al, 1993159104 HCMSpectral FFT Time domain 24-h HolterGlobal and specific vagal tone measurements of HRV were ⇓ in symptomatic patientsHRV does not add to the predictive accuracy of known risk factors in HCM
    SD or CADougherty et al, 199216016 CA survivors 5 CA nonsurvivors 5 normalsSpectral AR Time domain 24-h HolterHRV as measured by LF power and SDNN were significantly related to 1-y mortalityHRV is clinically useful to risk stratify CA survivors for 1-y mortality
    Huikuri et al, 199216122 CA survivors 22 controlSpectral AR Time domain 24-h Holter⇓HF power in CA survivors; LF power did not discriminate CA survivors Circadian pattern of HRV found in all patients
    Algra et al, 1993110193 SD cases 230 symptomatic patientsTime domain 24-h Holter⇓Short-term variation (0.05-0.50 Hz) independently increased the risk of SD by a factor of 2.6 ⇓Long-term variation (0.02-0.05 Hz) increased the risk of SD by a factor of 2HRV may be used to estimate the risk of SD

    ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme; AR, autoregressive; CA, cardiac arrest; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; EF, ejection fraction; FFT, fast Fourier transform; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HF, high frequency; HRV heart rate variability; LF, low frequency; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; NYHA, New York Heart Association classification; SD, sudden death; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; VF, ventricular fibrillation; and VT, ventricular tachycardia.

    Table 5. Normal Values of Standard Measures of HRV

    VariableUnitsNormal Values (mean±SD)
    Time Domain Analysis of Nominal 24 hours181
    HRV triangular index37±15
    Spectral Analysis of Stationary Supine 5-min Recording
    Total powerms23466 ±1018
    LF/HF ratio1.5-2.0

    See Table 1 also.

    Table 4A. Continued

    Disease StateAuthor of StudyPopulation (No. of Patients)Investigation ParameterClinical FindingPotential Value
    Myers et al, 19861626 normals 12 patients with structural heart disease (6 with and 6 without SD)Time and frequency domain 24-h HolterBoth time and frequency domain indices separated normals from SD patients ⇓HF power (0.35-0.5 Hz) was the best separator between heart disease patients with and without SDHF power may be a useful predictor of SD
    Martin et al, 198616320 normals 5 patients experiencing SD during Holter monitoringTime domain 24-h HolterSDNN index significantly lower in SD patientsTime domain indices may identify increased risk of SD
    Ventricular arrhythmiasVybiral et al, 199316424 VF 19 CADTime domain 24-h HolterHRV indices do not change consistently before VF
    Huikuri et al, 199316518 VT or CASpectral AR 24-h HolterAll power spectra of HRV were significantly ⇓ before the onset of sustained VT than before nonsustained VTA temporal relation exists between the decrease of HRV and the onset of sustained VT
    Hohnloser et al, 199416614 post-MI with VF or sustained 14 post-MI (matched)Spectral FFT Time domain 24-h HolterHRV of post MI-CA survivors do not differ from other post MI patients; they differ strikingly in terms of baroreflex sensitivityBaroreflex sensitivity, not HRV, distinguished post-MI patients with and without VF and VT
    Supraventricular arrhythmiasKocovic et al, 199316764 SVTSpectral FFT Time domain 5-min supine acquisition 24-h Holter⇑HR,⇓HRV, and ⇓parasympathetic components after radiofrequency ablationParasympathetic ganglia and fibers may be more dense in the mid and anterior low septum


    Correspondence to Marek Malik, PhD, MD, Chairman, Writing Committee of the Task Force, Department of Cardiological Sciences, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.


    • 1 Lown B, Verrier RL. Neural activity and ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med.1976; 294:1165-1170. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Corr PB, Yamada KA, Witkowski FX. Mechanisms controlling cardiac autonomic function and their relation to arrhythmogenesis. In: Fozzard HA, Haber E, Jennings RB, Katz AN, Morgan HE, eds. The Heart and Cardiovascular System. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1986:1343-1403. Google Scholar
    • 3 Schwartz PJ, Priori SG. Sympathetic nervous system and cardiac arrhythmias. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1990:330-343. Google Scholar
    • 4 Levy MN, Schwartz PJ, eds. Vagal Control of the Heart: Experimental Basis and Clinical Implications. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1994. Google Scholar
    • 5 Dreifus LS, Agarwal JB, Botvinick EH, Ferdinand KC, Fisch C, Fisher JD, Kennedy JW, Kerber RE, Lambert CR, Okike ON, Prystowsky EN, Saksena SV, Schroeder JS, Williams DO (American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Technology Assessment Committee). Heart rate variability for risk stratification of life-threatening arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 22:948-950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Hon EH, Lee ST. Electronic evaluations of the fetal heart rate patterns preceding fetal death: further observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1965; 87:814-826. Google Scholar
    • 7 Sayers BM. Analysis of heart rate variability. Ergonomics.1973; 16:17-32. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Penaz J, Roukenz J, Van der Waal HJ. In: Drischel H, Tiedt N, eds. Spectral Analysis of Some Spontaneous Rhythms in the Circulation. Leipzig, Germany: Biokybernetik, Karl Marx University; 1968:233-241. Google Scholar
    • 9 Luczak H, Lauring WJ. An analysis of heart rate variability. Ergonomics.1973; 16:85-97. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Hirsh JA, Bishop B. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate. Am J Physiol.1981; 241:H620-H629. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Ewing DJ, Martin CN, Young RJ, Clarke BF. The value of cardiovascular autonomic function tests: 10 years’ experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care.1985; 8:491-498. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Wolf MM, Varigos GA, Hunt D, Sloman JG. Sinus arrhythmia in acute myocardial infarction. Med J Aust.1978; 2:52-53. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Barger AC, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat to beat cardiovascular control. Science.1981; 213:220-222. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Pomeranz M, Macaulay RJB, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, Kilborn KM, Barger AC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ, Benson M. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol.1985; 248:H151-H153. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, Sandrone G, Malfatto G, Dell’Orto S, Piccaluga E, Turiel M, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Malliani A. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympathovagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res.1986; 59:178-193. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Moss AJ, and the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1987; 59:256-262. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Malik M, Farrell T, Cripps T, Camm AJ. Heart rate variability in relation to prognosis after myocardial infarction: selection of optimal processing techniques. Eur Heart J.1989; 10:1060-1074. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation.1992; 85:164-171. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Saul JP, Albrecht P, Berger RD, Cohen RJ. Analysis of long-term heart rate variability: methods, 1/f scaling and implications. In: Computers in Cardiology 1987. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1988:419-422. Google Scholar
    • 20 Bjökander I, Held C, Forslund L, Erikson S, Billing E, Hjemdahl P, Rehnqvist N. Heart rate variability in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Heart J.1992; 13:379. Abstract. Google Scholar
    • 21 Scherer P, Ohler JP, Hirche H, Höpp H-W. Definition of a new beat-to-beat parameter of heart rate variability. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.1993; 16:939. Abstract. Google Scholar
    • 22 Malik M, Xia R, Odemuyiwa O, Staunton A, Poloniecki J, Camm AJ. Influence of the recognition artefact in the automatic analysis of long-term electrocardiograms on time-domain measurement of heart rate variability. Med Biol Eng Comput.1993; 31:539-544. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Kay SM, Marple SL. Spectrum analysis: a modern perspective. Proc IEEE.1981; 69:1380-1419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation.1991; 84:1482-1492. Google Scholar
    • 25 Furlan R, Guzetti S, Crivellaro W, Dassi S, Tinelli M, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Continuous 24-hour assessment of the neural regulation of systemic arterial pressure and RR variabilities in ambulant subjects. Circulation.1990; 81:537-547. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Berger RD, Akselrod S, Gordon D, Cohen RJ. An efficient algorithm for spectral analysis of heart rate variability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1986; 33:900-904. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Rottman JN, Steinman RC, Albrecht P, Bigger JT, Rolnitzky LM, Fleiss JL. Efficient estimation of the heart period power spectrum suitable for physiologic or pharmacologic studies. Am J Cardiol.1990; 66:1522-1524. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Malik M, Camm AJ. Components of heart rate variability: what they really mean and what we really measure. Am J Cardiol.1993; 72:821-822. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Measurement and Analysis of Random Data. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 1966.Google Scholar
    • 30 Pinna GD, Maestri R, Di Cesare A, Colombo R, Minuco G. The accuracy of power-spectrum analysis of heart-rate variability from annotated RR list generated by Holter systems. Physiol Meas.1994; 15:163-179. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Merri M, Farden DC, Mottley JG, Titlebaum EL. Sampling frequency of the electrocardiogram for the spectral analysis of heart rate variability. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1990; 37:99-106. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Bianchi AM, Mainardi LT, Petrucci E, Signorini MG, Mainardi M, Cerutti S. Time-variant power spectrum analysis for the detection of transient episodes in HRV signal. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1993; 40:136-144. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33 Friesen GM, Jannett TC, Jadalloh MA, Yates SL, Quint SR, Nogle HT. A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1990; 37:85-98. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Correction of the heart rate variability signal for ectopics and missing beats. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:75-85. Google Scholar
    • 35 De Boer RW, Karemaker JM, Strackee J. Comparing spectra of a series of point events, particularly for heart-rate variability spectra. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1984; 31:384-387. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Harris FJ. On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Proc.1978; 66:51-83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 37 Box GEP, Jenkins GM. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, Calif: Holden Day; 1976. Google Scholar
    • 38 Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Cont.1974; 19:716-723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 39 Kaplan DT. The analysis of variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.1994; 5:16-19. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 40 Katona PG, Jih F. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: a noninvasive measure of parasympathetic cardiac control. J Appl Physiol.1975; 39:801-805. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Eckberg DL. Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow. J Appl Physiol.1983; 54:961-966. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Fouad FM, Tarazi RC, Ferrario CM, Fighaly S, Alicandri C. Assessment of parasympathetic control of heart rate by a noninvasive method. Am J Physiol.1984; 15:H838-H842. Google Scholar
    • 43 Schechtman VL, Kluge KA, Harper RM. Time-domain system for assessing variation in heart rate. Med Biol Eng Comput.1988; 26:367-373. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44 Coumel PH, Hermida JS, Wennerblöm B, Leenhardt A, Maison-Blanche P, Cauchemez B. Heart rate variability in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure, and the effects of beta-blocking therapy: a non-spectral analysis of heart rate oscillations. Eur Heart J.1991; 12:412-422. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 45 Grossman P, Van Beek J, Wientjes C. A comparison of three quantification methods for estimation of respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Psychophysiology.1990; 27:702-714. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46 Shin SJ, Tapp WN, Reisman SS, Natelson BH. Assessment of autonomic regulation of heart rate variability by the method of complex demodulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1989; 36:274-283. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47 Kobayashi M, Musha T. 1/f fluctuation of heart beat period. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1982; 29:456-457. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48 Yamamoto Y, Hughson RL. Coarse-graining spectral analysis: new method for studying heart rate variability. J Appl Physiol.1991; 71:1143-1150. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 49 Babloyantz A, Destexhe A. Is the normal heart a periodic oscillator? Biol Cybern.1988; 58:203-211. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 50 Morfill GE, Demmel V, Schmidt G. Der plötzliche Herztod: Neue Erkenntnisse durch die Anwendung komplexer Diagnoseverfahren. Bioscope.1994; 2:11-19. Google Scholar
    • 51 Schmidt G, Monfill GE. Nonlinear methods for heart rate variability assessment. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:87-98. Google Scholar
    • 52 Kleiger RE, Bigger JT, Bosner MS, Chung MK, Cook JR, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman R, Fleiss JL. Stability over time of variables measuring heart rate variability in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol.1991; 68:626-630.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 53 Van Hoogenhuyze DK, Weinstein N, Martin GJ, Weiss JS, Schaad JW, Sahyouni XN, Fintel D, Remme WJ, Singer DH. Reproducibility and relation to mean heart rate of heart rate variability in normal subjects and in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol.1991; 68:1668-1676. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 54 Kautzner J. Reproducibility of heart rate variability measurement. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:165-171. Google Scholar
    • 55 Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzsky LM, Steinman RC. Stability over time of heart period variability in patients with previous myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol.1992; 69:718-723. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 56 Bailey JJ, Berson AS, Garson A Jr, Horan LG, Macfarlane PW, Mortara DW, Zywietz C. Recommendations for standardization and specifications in automated electrocardiography. Circulation.1990; 81:730-739. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 57 Kennedy HN. Ambulatory (Holter) electrocardiography technology. Clin Cardiol.1992; 10:341-356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 58 Malik M, Cripps T, Farrell T, Camm AJ. Prognostic value of heart rate variability after myocardial infarction: a comparison of different data processing methods. Med Biol Eng Comput.1989; 27:603-611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 59 Jalife J, Michaels DC. Neural control of sinoatrial pacemaker activity. In: Levy MN, Schwartz PJ, eds. Vagal Control of the Heart: Experimental Basis and Clinical Implications. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1994:173-205. Google Scholar
    • 60 Noma A, Trautwein W. Relaxation of the ACh-induced potassium current in the rabbit sinoatrial node cell. Pflugers Arch.1978; 377:193-200. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 61 Osterrieder W, Noma A, Trautwein W. On the kinetics of the potassium channel activated by acetylcholine in the S-A node of the rabbit heart. Pflugers Arch.1980; 386:101-109. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 62 Sakmann B, Noma A, Trautwein W. Acetylcholine activation of single muscarinic K+ channels in isolated pacemaker cells of the mammalian heart. Nature.1983; 303:250-253. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 63 DiFrancesco D, Tromba C. Inhibition of the hyperpolarizing-activated current If, induced by acetylcholine in rabbit sino-atrial node myocytes. J Physiol (Lond).1988; 405:477-491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 64 DiFrancesco D, Tromba C. Muscarinic control of the hyperpolarizing activated current If in rabbit sino-atrial node myocytes. J Physiol (Lond).1988; 405:493-510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 65 Irisawa H, Brown HF, Giles WR. Cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev.1993; 73:197-227. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 66 Irisawa H, Giles WR. Sinus and atrioventricular node cells: cellular electrophysiology. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1990:95-102. Google Scholar
    • 67 DiFrancesco D. The contribution of the pacemaker current (If) to generation of spontaneous activity in rabbit sino-atrial node myocytes. J Physiol (Lond).1991; 434:23-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 68 Trautwein W, Kameyama M. Intracellular control of calcium and potassium currents in cardiac cells. Jpn Heart J.1986; 27:31-50. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 69 Brown HF, DiFrancesco D, Noble SJ. How does adrenaline accelerate the heart? Nature.1979; 280:235-236. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 70 DiFrancesco D, Ferroni A, Mazzanti M, Tromba C. Properties of the hyperpolarizing-activated current (If) in cells isolated from the rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol (Lond).1986; 377:61-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 71 Levy MN. Sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res.1971; 29:437-445. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 72 Chess GF, Tam RMK, Calaresu FR. Influence of cardiac neural inputs on rhythmic variations of heart period in the cat. Am J Physiol.1975; 228:775-780. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 73 Akselrod S, Gordon D, Madwed JB, Snidman NC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am J Physiol.1985; 249:H867-H875. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 74 Saul JP, Rea RF, Eckberg DL, Berger RD, Cohen RJ. Heart rate and muscle sympathetic nerve variability during reflex changes of autonomic activity. Am J Physiol.1990; 258:H713-H721. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 75 Schwartz PJ, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Brown AM. A cardiocardiac sympathovagal reflex in the cat. Circ Res.1973; 32:215-220. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 76 Malliani A. Cardiovascular sympathetic afferent fibers. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol.1982; 94:11-74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 77 Cerati D, Schwartz PJ. Single cardiac vagal fiber activity, acute myocardial ischemia, and risk for sudden death. Circ Res.1991; 69:1389-1401. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 78 Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability: a noninvasive signature of cardiac autonomic function. Crit Rev Biomed Eng.1993; 21:245-311. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 79 Rimoldi O, Pierini S, Ferrari A, Cerutti S, Pagani M, Malliani A. Analysis of short-term oscillations of R-R and arterial pressure in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol.1990; 258:H967-H976. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 80 Montano N, Ruscone TG, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation.1994; 90:1826-1831. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 81 Appel ML, Berger RD, Saul JP, Smith JM, Cohen RJ. Beat to beat variability in cardiovascular variables: noise or music? J Am Coll Cardiol.1989; 14:1139-1148. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 82 Malliani A, Lombardi F, Pagani M. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability: a tool to explore neural regulatory mechanisms. Br Heart J.1994; 71:1-2. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 83 Malik M, Camm AJ. Heart rate variability and clinical cardiology. Br Heart J.1994; 71:3-6. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 84 Casolo GC, Stroder P, Signorini C, Calzolari F, Zucchini M, Balli E, Sulla A, Lazzerini S. Heart rate variability during the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Circulation.1992; 85:2073-2079. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 85 Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M, De Ferrari GM, Billman GE, Foreman RD. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death: new insights from the analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation.1988; 78:969-979. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 86 Malliani A, Schwartz PJ, Zanchetti A. A sympathetic reflex elicited by experimental coronary occlusion. Am J Physiol.1969; 217:703-709. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 87 Brown AM, Malliani A. Spinal sympathetic reflexes initiated by coronary receptors. J Physiol.1971; 212:685-705. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 88 Malliani A, Recordati G, Schwartz PJ. Nervous activity of afferent cardiac sympathetic fibres with atrial and ventricular endings. J Physiol (Lond).1973; 229:457-469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 89 Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC, Schneider WJ. Time course of recovery of heart period variability after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.1991; 18:1643-1649. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 90 Lombardi F, Sandrone G, Pernpruner S, Sala R, Garimoldi M, Cerutti S, Baselli G, Pagani M, Malliani A. Heart rate variability as an index of sympathovagal interaction after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1987; 60:1239-1245. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 91 Lombardi F, Sandrone G, Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Colombo E, Guzzetti S, Malliani A. Circadian variation of spectral indices of heart rate variability after myocardial infarction. Am Heart J.1992; 123:1521-1529. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 92 Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Diurnal variations of neurocardiac rhythms in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1991; 68:155-160. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 93 Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Kleiger RE, Rottman JN. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation.1992; 85:164-171. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 94 Ewing DJ, Neilson JMM, Traus P. New method for assessing cardiac parasympathetic activity using 24-hour electrocardiograms. Br Heart J.1984; 52:396-402. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 95 Kitney RI, Byrne S, Edmonds ME, Watkins PJ, Roberts VC. Heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic diabetic neuropathy. Automedica.1982; 4:155-167. Google Scholar
    • 96 Pagani M, Malfatto G, Pierini S, Casati R, Masu AM, Poli M, Guzzetti S, Lombardi F, Cerutti S, Malliani A. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic diabetic neuropathy. J Auton Nerv Syst.1988; 23:143-153. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 97 Freeman R, Saul JP, Roberts MS, Berger RD, Broadbridge C, Cohen RJ. Spectral analysis of heart rate in diabetic neuropathy. Arch Neurol.1991; 48:185-190. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 98 Bernardi L, Ricordi L, Lazzari P, Soldá P, Calciati A, Ferrari MR, Vandea I, Finardi G, Frantino P. Impaired circulation modulation of sympathovagal modulation of sympathovagal activity in diabetes. Circulation.1992; 86:1443-1452. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 99 Bernardi L, Salvucci F, Suardi R, Soldá PL, Calciati A, Perlini S, Falcone C, Ricciardi L. Evidence for an intrinsic mechanism regulating heart rate variability in the transplanted and the intact heart during submaximal dynamic exercise? Cardiovasc Res.1990; 24:969-981. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 100 Sands KE, Appel ML, Lilly LS, Schoen FJ, Mudge GH Jr, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability in human cardiac transplant recipients. Circulation.1989; 79:76-82. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 101 Fallen EL, Kamath MV, Ghista DN, Fitchett D. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability following human heart transplantation: evidence for functional reinnervation. J Auton Nerv Syst.1988; 23:199-206. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 102 Casolo G, Balli E, Taddei T, Amuhasi J, Gori C. Decreased spontaneous heart rate variability on congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol.1989; 64:1162-1167. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 103 Nolan J, Flapan AD, Capewell S, MacDonald TM, Neilson JMM, Ewing DJ. Decreased cardiac parasympathetic activity in chronic heart failure and its relation to left ventricular function. Br Heart J.1992; 69:761-767. Google Scholar
    • 104 Kienzle MG, Ferguson DW, Birkett CL, Myers GA, Berg WJ, Mariano DJ. Clinical hemodynamic and sympathetic neural correlates of heart rate variability in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol.1992; 69:482-485. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 105 Mortara A, La Rovere MT, Signorini MG, Pantaleo P, Pinna G, Martinelli L, Ceconi C, Cerutti S, Tavazzi L. Can power spectral analysis of heart rate variability identify a high risk subgroup of congestive heart failure patients with excessive sympathetic activation? A pilot study before and after heart transplantation. Br Heart J.1994; 71:422-430. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 106 Gordon D, Herrera VL, McAlpine L, Cohen RJ, Akselrod S, Lang P, Norwood WI. Heart rate spectral analysis: a noninvasive probe of cardiovascular regulation in critically ill children with heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol.1988; 9:69-77. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 107 Inoue K, Miyake S, Kumashiro M, Ogata H, Yoshimura O. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in traumatic quadriplegic humans. Am J Physiol.1990; 258:H1722-H1726. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 108 Koh J, Brown TE, Beightol LA, Ha CY, Eckberg DL. Human autonomic rhythms: vagal cardiac mechanisms in tetraplegic patients. J Physiol (Lond). 1994;474.3:483-495. Google Scholar
    • 109 Guzzetti S, Cogliati C, Broggi C, Carozzi C, Caldirolo D, Lombardi F, Malliani A. Heart period and arterial pressure variabilities in quadriplegic patients. Am J Physiol.1994; 266:H1112-H1120. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 110 Algra A, Tijssen JGP, Roelandt JRTC, Pool J, Lubsen J. Heart rate variability from 24-hour electrocardiography and the 2-year risk for sudden death. Circulation.1993; 88:180-185. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 111 Schwartz PJ, De Ferrari GM. Interventions changing heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:407-420. Google Scholar
    • 112 De Ferrari GM, Vanoli E, Schwartz PJ. Cardiac vagal activity, myocardial ischemia and sudden death. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1995:422-434. Google Scholar
    • 113 Molgaard H, Mickley H, Pless P, Bjerregaard P, Moller M. Effects of metoprolol on heart rate variability in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1993; 71:1357-1359. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 114 Sandrone G, Mortara A, Torzillo D, La Rovere MT, Malliani A, Lombardi F. Effects of beta blockers (atenolol or metoprolol) on heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1994; 74:340-345. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 115 Adamson PB, Huang MH, Vanoli E, Foreman RD, Schwartz PJ, Hull SS Jr. Unexpected interaction between β-adrenergic blockade and heart rate variability before and after myocardial infarction: a longitudinal study in dogs at high and low risk for sudden death. Circulation.1994; 90:976-982. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 116 Zuanetti G, Latini R, Neilson JMM, Schwartz PJ, Ewing DJ, and the Antiarrhythmic Drug Evaluation Group (ADEG). Heart rate variability in patients with ventricular arrhythmias: effect of antiarrhythmic drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol.1991; 17:604-612. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 117 Lombardi F, Torzillo D, Sandrone G, Dalla Vecchia L, Finocchiaro ML, Bernasconi R, Cappiello E. Beta-blocking effect of propafenone based on spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Am J Cardiol.1992; 70:1028-1034. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 118 Bigger JT Jr, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC, Fleiss JL. Predicting mortality after myocardial infarction from the response of RR variability to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol.1994; 23:733-740. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 119 Casadei B, Pipilis A, Sessa F, Conway J, Sleight P. Low doses of scopolamine increase cardiac vagal tone in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Circulation.1993; 88:353-357. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 120 De Ferrari GM, Mantica M, Vanoli E, Hull SS Jr, Schwartz PJ. Scopolamine increases vagal tone and vagal reflexes in patients after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 22:1327-1334. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 121 Pedretti R, Colombo E, Sarzi Braga S, Car B. Influence of transdermal scopolamine on cardiac sympathovagal interaction after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1993; 72:384-392. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 122 Vybiral T, Glaser DH, Morris G, Hess KR, Yang K, Francis M, Pratt CM. Effects of low dose scopolamine on heart rate variability in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 22:1320-1326. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 123 La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Pantaneleo P, Maestri R, Cobelli F, Tavazzi L. Scopolamine improves autonomic balance in advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation.1994; 90:838-843. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 124 Hull SS Jr, Vanoli E, Adamson PB, De Ferrari GM, Foreman RD, Schwartz PJ. Do increase in markers of vagal activity imply protection from sudden death? The case of scopolamine. Circulation.1995; 91:2516-2519. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 125 Zabel M, Klingenheben T, Hohnloser SH. Changes in autonomic tone following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: assessment by analysis of heart rate variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.1994; 5:211-218. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 126 O’Connor GT, Buring JE, Yusuf S, Goldhaber SZ, Olmstead EM, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hennekens CH. An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. Circulation.1989; 80:234-244. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 127 Furlan R, Piazza D, Dell’Orto S, Gentile E, Cerutti S, Pagani M, Malliani A. Early and late effects of exercise and athletic training on neural mechanisms controlling heart rate. Cardiovasc Res.1993; 27:482-488. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 128 Arai Y, Saul JP, Albrecht P, Hartley LH, Lilly LS, Cohen RJ, Colucci WS. Modulation of cardiac autonomic activity during and immediately after exercise. Am J Physiol.1989; 256:H132-H141. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 129 Hull SS Jr, Vanoli E, Adamson PB, Verrier RL, Foreman RD, Schwartz PJ. Exercise training confers anticipatory protection from sudden death during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation.1994; 89:548-552. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 130 La Rovere MT, Mortara A, Sandrone G, Lombardi F. Autonomic nervous system adaptation to short-term exercise training. Chest.1992; 101:299-303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 131 Odemuyiwa O, Malik M, Farrell T, Bashir Y, Poloniecki J, Camm J. Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1991; 68:434-439. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 132 Greene HL, Richardson DW, Barker AH, Roden DM, Capone RJ, Echt DS, Friedman LM, Gillespie MJ, Hallstrom AP, Verter J, and the CAPS Investigators. Classification of deaths after myocardial infarction as arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic (the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study). Am J Cardiol.1989; 63:1-6. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 133 Malik M, Camm AJ. Significance of long-term components of heart rate variability for the further prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res.1990; 24:793-803. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 134 Malik M, Farrell T, Camm AJ. Circadian rhythm of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction and its influence on the prognostic value of heart rate variability. Am J Cardiol.1990; 66:1049-1054. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 135 Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC. The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation.1993; 88:927-934. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 136 Fei L, Malik M. Short- and long-term assessment of heart rate variability for postinfarction risk stratification. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:341-346. Google Scholar
    • 137 Bigger JT, Kleiger RE, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC, Miller JP, and the Multicenter Post-Infarction Research Group. Components of heart rate variability measured during healing of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.1988; 61:208-215. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 138 Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC. Frequency domain measures of heart period variability to assess risk late after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 21:729-736. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 139 Camm AJ, Fei L. Risk stratification following myocardial infarction: heart rate variability and other risk factors. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:369-392. Google Scholar
    • 140 Bannister R. Autonomic Failure. A Textbook of Clinical Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 1988. Google Scholar
    • 141 Ewing DJ, Campbell IW, Clarke BF. The natural history of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Q J Med.1980; 193:95-108. Google Scholar
    • 142 Smith S. Reduced sinus arrhythmia in diabetic autonomic neuropathy: diagnostic value of an age related normal range. Br Med J.1982; 285:1599-1601. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 143 O’Brien IA, O’Hare P, Corrall RJM. Heart rate variability in healthy subjects: effect of age and the derivation of normal ranges for tests of autonomic function. Br Heart J.1986; 55:348-354. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 144 Ewing DJ, Neilson JMM, Shapiro JA, Reid W. Twenty four hour heart rate variability: effects of posture, sleep and time of day in healthy controls and comparison with bedside tests of autonomic function in diabetic patients. Br Heart J.1991; 65:239-244. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 145 Malpas SC, Maling TJB. Heart rate variability and cardiac autonomic function in diabetes. Diabetes.1990; 39:1177-1181. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 146 Bianchi A, Bontempi B, Cerutti S, Gianoglio P, Comi G, Natali Sora MG. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability signal and respiration in diabetic subjects. Med Biol Eng Comput.1990; 28:205-211. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 147 Bellavere F, Balzani I, De Masi G, Carraro M, Carenza P, Cobelli C, Thomaseth K. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variation improves assessment of diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes.1992; 41:633-640. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 148 Van den Akker TJ, Koelman ASM, Hogenhuis LAH, Rompelman G. Heart rate variability and blood pressure oscillations in diabetics with autonomic neuropathy. Automedica.1983; 4:201-208. Google Scholar
    • 149 Guzzetti S, Dassi S, Pecis M, Casati R, Masu AM, Longoni P, Tinelli M, Cerutti S, Pagani M, Malliani A. Altered pattern of circadian neural control of heart period in mild hypertension. J Hypertens.1991; 9:831-838. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 150 Langewitz W, Ruddel H, Schachinger H. Reduced parasympathetic cardiac control in patients with hypertension at rest and under mental stress. Am Heart J.1994; 127:122-128. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 151 Saul JP, Arai Y, Berger RD, Lily LS, Wilson S, Colucci WS, Cohen RJ. Assessment of autonomic regulation in chronic congestive heart failure by the heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Cardiol.1988; 61:1292-1299. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 152 Binkley PF, Nunziata E, Haas GJ, Nelson SD, Cody RJ. Parasympathetic withdrawal is an integral component of autonomic imbalance in congestive heart failure: demonstration in human subjects and verification in a paced canine model of ventricular failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.1991; 18:464-472. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 153 Townend JN, West JN, Davies MK, Littler WA. Effect of quinapril on blood pressure and heart rate in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol.1992; 69:1587-1590. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 154 Binkley PF, Haas GJ, Starling RC, Nunziata E, Hatton PA, Leier CV, Cody JR. Sustained augmentation of parasympathetic tone with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 21:655-661. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 155 Woo MA, Stevenson WG, Moser DK, Middlekauff HR. Complex heart rate variability and serum norepinephrine levels in patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol.1994; 23:565-569. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 156 Alexopoulos D, Yusuf S, Johnston JA, Bostock J, Sleight P, Yacoub MH. The 24-hour heart rate behavior in long-term survivors of cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol.1988; 61:880-884. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 157 Stein KM, Bores JS, Hochreites C, Okin PM, Herrold EM, Devereux RB, Kligfield P. Prognostic value and physiological correlates of heart rate variability in chronic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation.1993; 88:127-135. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 158 Marangoni S, Scalvini S, Mai R, Quadri A, Levi GF. Heart rate variability assessment in patients with mitral valve prolapse syndrome. Am J Noninvas Cardiol.1993; 7:210-214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 159 Counihan PJ, Fei L, Bashir Y, Farrel TG, Haywood GA, McKenna WJ. Assessment of heart rate variability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: association with clinical and prognostic features. Circulation.1993; 88:1682-1690. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 160 Dougherty CM, Burr RL. Comparison of heart rate variability in survivors and nonsurvivors of sudden cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol.1992; 70:441-448. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 161 Huikuri HV, Linnaluoto MK, Seppanen T, Airaksinen KEJ, Kessler KM, Takkunen JT, Myerburg RJ. Circadian rhythm of heart rate variability in survivors of cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol.1992; 70:610-615. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 162 Myers GA, Martin GJ, Magid NM, Barnett PS, Schaad JW, Weiss JS, Lesch M, Singer DH. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability in sudden cardiac death: comparison to other methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1986; 33:1149-1156. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 163 Martin GJ, Magid NM, Myers G, Barnett PS, Schaad JW, Weiss JS, Lesch M, Singer DH. Heart rate variability and sudden death secondary to coronary artery disease during ambulatory ECG monitoring. Am J Cardiol.1986; 60:86-89. Google Scholar
    • 164 Vybiral T, Glaeser DH, Goldberger AL, Rigney DR, Hess KR, Mietus J, Skinner JE, Francis M, Pratt CM. Conventional heart rate variability analysis of ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings fails to predict imminent ventricular fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol.1993; 22:557-565. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 165 Huikuri HV, Valkama JO, Airaksinen KEJ, Seppanen T, Kessler KM, Takkunen JT, Myerburg RJ. Frequency domain measures of heart rate variability before the onset of nonsustained and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation.1993; 87:1220-1228. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 166 Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, van de Loo A, Hablawetz E, Just H, Schwartz PJ. Reflex versus tonic vagal activity as a prognostic parameter in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Circulation.1994; 89:1068-1073. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 167 Kocovic DZ, Harada T, Shea JB, Soroff D, Friedman PL. Alterations of heart rate and of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation.1993; 88:1671-1681. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 168 Lefler CT, Saul JP, Cohen RJ. Rate-related and autonomic effects on atrioventricular conduction assessed through beat-to-beat PR interval and cycle length variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.1994; 5:2-15. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 169 Berger RD, Saul JP, Cohen RJ. Assessment of autonomic response by broad-band respiration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1989; 36:1061-1065. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 170 Berger RD, Saul JP, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation, I: the canine atrial rate response. Am J Physiol.1989; 256:H142-H152. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 171 Saul JP, Berger RD, Chen MH, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation, II: respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Am J Physiol.1989; 256:H153-H161. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 172 Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein SP, Chen MH, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol.1991; 261:H1231-H1245. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 173 Baselli G, Cerutti S, Civardi S, Malliani A, Pagani M. Cardiovascular variability signals: towards the identification of a closed-loop model of the neural control mechanisms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng.1988; 35:1033-1046. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 174 Appel ML, Saul JP, Berger RD, Cohen RJ. Closed loop identification of cardiovascular circulatory mechanisms. In: Computers in Cardiology 1989. Los Alamitos, Calif: IEEE Press; 1990:3-7. Google Scholar
    • 175 Tsuji H, Venditti FJ, Manders ES, Evans JC, Larson MG, Feldman CL, Levy D. Reduced heart rate variability and mortality risk in an elderly cohort: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation.1994; 90:878-883. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 176 Vanoli E, Adamson PB, Lin B, Pinna GD, Lazzara R, Or WC. Heart rate variability during specific sleep stages: a comparison of healthy subjects with patients after myocardial infarction. Circulation.1995; 91:1918-1922. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 177 Singer DH, Ori Z. Changes in heart rate variability associated with sudden cardiac death. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:429-448. Google Scholar
    • 178 Malfatto, G, Rosen TS, Steinberg SF, Ursell PC, Sun LS, Daniel S, Danilo P Jr, Rosen MR. Sympathetic neural modulation of cardiac impulse initiation and repolarization in the newborn rat. Circ Res.1990; 66:427-437. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 179 Hirsch M, Karin J, Akselrod S. Heart rate variability in the fetus. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:517-531. Google Scholar
    • 180 Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Groppelli A, Pedotti A, Mancia G. Heart rate and blood pressure variability and their interaction in hypertension. In: Malik M, Camm AJ, eds. Heart Rate Variability. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1995:465-478. Google Scholar
    • 181 Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Steinman RC, Rolnitzky LM, Schneider WJ, Stein PK. RR variability in healthy, middle-age persons compared with patients with chronic coronary heart disease or recent acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.1995; 91:1936-1943.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar


    eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

    Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.