Troglitazone Inhibits Voltage-Dependent Calcium Currents in Guinea Pig Cardiac Myocytes
Abstract
Background—It has been suggested that intracellular Ca2+ overload in cardiac myocytes leads to the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Troglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing agent, is a promising therapeutic agent for diabetes and has been shown to prevent diabetes-induced myocardial changes. To elucidate the underlying mechanism of troglitazone action on cardiac myocytes, the effects of troglitazone on voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents were examined and compared with classic Ca2+ antagonists (verapamil and nifedipine).
Methods and Results—Whole-cell voltage-clamp techniques were applied in single guinea pig atrial myocytes. Under control conditions with CsCl internal solution, the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents consisted of both T-type (ICa,T) and L-type (ICa,L) Ca2+ currents. Troglitazone effectively reduced the amplitude of ICa,L in a concentration-dependent manner. Troglitazone also suppressed ICa,T, but the effect of troglitazone on ICa,T was less potent than that on ICa,L. The current-voltage relationships for ICa,L and the reversal potential for ICa,L were not altered by troglitazone. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration of troglitazone on ICa,L measured at a holding potential of −40 mV was 6.3 μmol/L, and 30 μmol/L troglitazone almost completely inhibited ICa,L. Troglitazone 10 μmol/L did not affect the time courses for inactivation of ICa,L and inhibited ICa,L mainly in a use-independent fashion, without shifting the voltage-dependency of inactivation. This effect was different from those of verapamil and nifedipine. Troglitazone also reduced isoproterenol- or cAMP-enhanced ICa,L.
Conclusions—These results demonstrate that troglitazone inhibits voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents (T-type and L-type) and then antagonizes the effects of isoproterenol in cardiac myocytes, thus possibly playing a role in preventing diabetes-induced intracellular Ca2+ overload and subsequent myocardial changes.
Myocardial contractile dysfunction is a major complication of diabetes, known as diabetic cardiomyopathy.1234 The subcellular mechanisms responsible for cardiomyopathy are unknown. However, several cellular defects, including depressions in sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+ uptake,5 Na+-K+ pump,6 sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger activities,7 and the alteration of mitochondrial functions,8 have been suggested to be contributors to the development of this disease. The net result of these changes in Ca2+ homeostasis causes an intracellular Ca2+ overload, thereby resulting in cellular damage and, ultimately, diabetic cardiomyopathy. Moreover, diabetes prolongs the action potential duration9101112 and increases the number of myocardial voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels,1314 something that may also play a role in causing diabetic cardiomyopathy. In fact, it has been reported that in chronically diabetic rats, elevated tissue Ca2+ levels are present15 and treatment with verapamil or diltiazem, a voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel blocker, lessens cardiac dysfunction.161718 Thus, it is likely that excess Ca2+ influx through the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels contributes to induce intracellular Ca2+ overload and consequently diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Troglitazone, a novel member of the insulin-sensitizing thiazolidinediones, has been widely used to treat patients with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and other insulin- resistant diseases. Treatment with troglitazone reduced hyperglycemia, plasma triglycerides, and blood pressure.19202122 Recent studies show that troglitazone attenuates high- glucose–induced abnormalities in relaxation and intracellular calcium in rat ventricular myocytes23 and may improve cardiac function in diabetic patients.24 Until now, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of troglitazone on hearts have not been clearly established, but several articles have shown that troglitazone inhibits the voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ currents (ICa,L) in vascular smooth muscle cells.2526
Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to clarify the effects of troglitazone on the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents (T-type [ICa,T] and L-type) in cardiac myocytes. We have also made comparisons with the classic Ca2+ antagonists verapamil and nifedipine.
Methods
Cell Preparation
Single atrial myocytes were obtained from guinea pig hearts by an enzymatic dissociation procedure described elsewhere.27 Briefly, the animals were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital, and their hearts were rapidly removed and retrogradely Langendorff-perfused at 35°C to 37°C with an oxygenated Tyrode’s solution. The hearts were then perfused with Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution for ≈10 minutes and subsequently with the same solution containing collagenase (0.04% wt/vol type 1, Sigma Chemical Co) for 17 to 20 minutes. The digested hearts were stored in a high-K+/low-Cl− solution27 at 5°C for later experimentation. The atria were then removed, and cells were obtained by gentle mechanical agitation. This procedure consistently yielded an acceptable number of quiescent and relaxed atrial cells.
Solution and Drugs
The composition of the normal Tyrode’s solution was (in mmol/L) NaCl 136.5, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 0.53, glucose 5.5, and HEPES-NaOH buffer 5, pH 7.4. The Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution was identical to normal Tyrode’s solution except that CaCl2 was omitted. To record voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents, K+ currents were eliminated by the internal Cs and external Ba (5 mmol/L), and Ca2+-activated currents were blocked by 10 mmol/L EGTA and 2 mmol/L BAPTA in the internal solution. The composition of the internal solution was (in mmol/L) CsCl 140, EGTA 10, BAPTA 2, Na2-ATP 3, GTP (sodium salt, Sigma) 0.1, MgCl2 1, and HEPES-CsOH buffer 5, pH 7.3. In the experiments in which the cells were held at −80 mV, the bath was perfused with the following solution (in mmol/L) to block the voltage-dependent Na+ current: tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA-Cl) 140, BaCl2 5, MgCl2 0.53, glucose 5.5, tetrodotoxin (TTX) 0.01, and HEPES-CsOH buffer 5, pH 7.4. Troglitazone was obtained from Sankyo Co Ltd. Troglitazone was dissolved in DMSO to give a stock solution of 1 to 30 mmol/L, and the final concentration of DMSO applied to the bathing solution was 0.1%. Nifedipine and verapamil were dissolved in ethanol to give a stock solution of 10 mmol/L. In several experiments, cAMP was added to the pipette solution. (±)Isoproterenol, cAMP, verapamil, and nifedipine were purchased from Sigma.
Recording Technique and Data Analysis
Membrane currents were recorded with patch electrodes in a whole-cell clamp configuration2728 and a patch-clamp amplifier (EPC-7, List Electronics). The heat-polished patch electrodes had a tip resistance of 3 to 6 MΩ. The membrane currents were monitored with a high-gain storage oscilloscope (COS 5020-ST, Kikusui Electronics). At the start of each experiment, the series resistance was compensated. The data were stored on video cassettes with a PCM converter system (RP-880, NF electronic circuit design). Later, the data were reproduced, low-pass–filtered at 2 kHz (−3 dB) with a Bessel filter (FV-665, NF, 48-dB/octave slope attenuation), sampled at 5 kHz, and analyzed off-line on a computer with p-Clamp software (Axon Instruments). In general, we used a holding potential of −40 mV at a frequency of 0.2 Hz to inactivate the voltage-dependent Na+ current. In experiments to evaluate the contribution of ICa,T or voltage-dependence of the drug, a holding potential of −80 mV was used in combination with the high-TEA solution containing Ba2+ 5 mmol/L in place of Ca2+ (see Methods). Statistical results are expressed as mean±SD. Student’s t tests were performed, with a value of P<0.05 considered significant.
The first data were usually taken after the current amplitude of Ca2+ currents had been stabilized (2 to 3 minutes after the rupture of the membrane). After that, we could investigate the effects of drugs on the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents for ≈15 to 20 minutes. In experiments with cAMP, data were taken immediately after the rupture of the membrane. To measure the amplitude of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents, we subtracted from the peak amplitude of Ca2+ currents in the original trace to the current level in the presence of Cd2+ (1 mmol/L). In preliminary experiments, we confirmed that 0.1% DMSO did not affect the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents significantly. Furthermore, to exclude the effects of DMSO, 0.1% DMSO was always added to the bathing solution. The steady-state inactivation parameters of the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents were analyzed with double-pulse protocols. Conditioning voltage pulses (3 seconds in duration) for various membrane potentials between −70 and +0 mV were applied from a holding potential of −80 mV. Ten milliseconds after the end of each conditioning pulse, a test pulse of +10 mV (0.2 seconds in duration) was applied to elicit Ca2+ currents. The ratio between the amplitude of the Ca2+ currents with conditioning pulse and that without conditioning pulse was plotted for the membrane potential of each conditioning pulse. The interval between sets of double pulses was 20 seconds.
Results
Effects of Troglitazone on Voltage-Dependent ICa,L
The effects of troglitazone on the voltage-dependent ICa,L were examined in single atrial myocytes (Figure 1). The membrane potential was held at −40 mV, and command voltage pulses (320 ms in duration) to +0 mV were applied at 0.2 Hz. In control cells, a transient inward current was elicited during each voltage pulse (Figure 1A, a). The inward current was blocked by nifedipine 1 μmol/L (see Figures 9 and 10), verapamil 1 μmol/L (Figure 9), and Cd2+ 1 mmol/L (Figure 1A, f), indicating that it consisted of ICa,L. Troglitazone 10 μmol/L reduced the amplitude of ICa,L from −500 to −140 pA in this cell within 2 minutes (Figure 1A, b). After washout, ICa,L gradually returned to near control level. The time courses of changes in the peak ICa,L measured from the zero current level are shown in Figure 1B. Troglitazone 30 μmol/L almost completely blocked ICa,L (Figure 1A, d). After washout, the depressed current gradually increased, but the inhibitory effects of troglitazone 30 μmol/L were not easily reversible. Figure 2 shows the effects of troglitazone on current-voltage relationships of ICa,L. The cells were held at −40 mV, and command voltage steps to various membrane potentials were applied at 0.2 Hz. The current-voltage relationships of ICa,L measured at the peak inward current are shown in Figure 2B. Troglitazone reduced the current amplitude of ICa,L at any command voltage without affecting the voltage dependence of ICa,L. On average, troglitazone 5 μmol/L decreased peak ICa,L at +0 mV by 42±6% (n=5). Troglitazone 30 μmol/L almost completely blocked ICa,L. The reversal potential for ICa,L was not altered significantly by troglitazone. These results suggest that troglitazone inhibited ICa,L in cardiac myocytes. The effects of various concentrations of troglitazone on the amplitude of ICa,L are shown in Figure 3. The cells were held at −40 mV, and the command pulses to +0 mV were applied at 0.2 Hz. Troglitazone at concentrations >1 μmol/L decreased ICa,L, and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of troglitazone on ICa,L was 6.3 μmol/L.
Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the effects of troglitazone on isoproterenol- and cAMP-enhanced ICa,L. Isoproterenol 1 μmol/L increased the amplitude of ICa,L (Figure 4, b). Immediately after application of isoproterenol, there was a rapid small increase in ICa,L, probably reflected by direct activation of the GTP-binding proteins (Gs),29 and then a large increase in ICa,L was observed. The additional application of troglitazone 30 μmol/L completely abolished ICa,L (Figure 4, c). Moreover, when cAMP was applied through the patch pipette, ICa,L increased from −370 to −1080 pA in this cell (Figure 5A and 5B). Troglitazone 30 μmol/L also abolished ICa,L (Figure 5A, c and 5B, c). Figure 5D shows the current-voltage relationships of the peak ICa,L in the presence of cAMP (Figure 5C, a) and with the additional application of troglitazone 30 μmol/L (Figure 5C, b). Troglitazone 30 μmol/L decreased ICa,L at all command potentials. These results suggest that troglitazone antagonizes the effects of isoproterenol on ICa,L independently of β-adrenergic receptors.
Effects of Troglitazone on the Voltage-Dependent ICa,L and ICa,T
The existence of 2 distinct Ca2+ currents has been shown for cardiac myocytes in several kinds of mammalian hearts.30313233ICa,T activates at low voltages and inactivates quickly; ICa,L activates at high voltages and inactivates slowly. In addition, the T-type Ca2+ channel is about equally permeable to Ca2+ and Ba2+ ions and has the same inactivation kinetics in Ba2+ as in Ca2+; the L-type Ca2+ channel is more permeable to Ba2+ and has a dramatically slower inactivation time in Ba2+ than Ca2+. To clarify whether both types of Ca2+ currents can be identified in guinea pig atrial myocytes, we carried out tests under the conditions in which extracellular Na+ ions were replaced by impermeable TEA+ ions, and 5 mmol/L BaCl2 was added in place of Ca2+. Sodium removal induced cell contracture, but under our conditions with EGTA 10 mmol/L and BAPTA 2 mmol/L in the patch pipette, the cell attached to the patch electrode survives, probably owing to the diffusion of EGTA and BAPTA into the cytosol. The cells were held at −40 or −80 mV (Figure 6A), and command voltage steps (320 ms in duration) were applied to various membrane potentials. The current-voltage relationships of the peak inward current are shown in Figure 6C. At a holding potential of −40 mV, the inward current was elicited at positive potentials to −30 mV (Figure 6A, right). A small fraction of current was inactivated at the command pulses to −20 and −10 mV. Conversely, when the cell was held at −80 mV, the transient inward current was recorded at a command potential of −30 mV and was overlapped on the noninactivated component at a command potential of −20 mV (Figure 6A, left). The current traces subtracted from the current of a holding potential of −80 mV to that of a holding potential of −40 mV at command potentials of −30, −20, and +0 mV are shown in Figure 6B. The transient inward current rapidly inactivated within 50 ms and could be discriminated from the sustained component. Cd2+ 1 mmol/L abolished both types of inward current, but nifedipine 1 μmol/L (data not shown) failed to inhibit the transient component. These findings suggest that both types of Ca2+ currents exist in guinea pig atrial myocytes. The fast inward current consisted of ICa,T, and the slow component consisted primarily of ICa,L. Figure 7 shows the effects of troglitazone on both types of Ca2+ currents. ICa,T and ICa,L were elicited at a command voltage to −30 and +10 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV, respectively. Troglitazone 10 μmol/L inhibited both types of Ca2+ currents (Figure 7A and 7B) but inhibited ICa,L more effectively than ICa,T (Figure 7B).
Effects of Troglitazone on the Kinetic Parameters of the Voltage-Dependent ICa,L
Figure 8 shows the effects of troglitazone on the inactivation time courses of ICa,L. Under conditions in which the cell was perfused with normal Tyrode’s solution, the inactivation time courses of ICa,L were well fitted by the sum of 2 exponentials (Figure 8A and Table) as previously described.34 Troglitazone 10 μmol/L did not affect the time courses of inactivation of ICa,L significantly (Figure 8 and Table). The differences between the values of τ1 and τ2 in the control and those in the presence of troglitazone were not statistically significant.
The use-dependent block of troglitazone was also examined and compared with the classic Ca2+ antagonists verapamil and nifedipine as shown in Figure 9. The changes in the amplitude of ICa,L elicited by successively applied command pulses were measured in the absence or presence of each drug with a test depolarizing pulse to +0 mV from a holding potential of −40 mV at 0.2 Hz. The amplitude of ICa,L recorded by the last pulse of a train stimulation before application of the agents (Figure 9A through D) was normalized to 1.0. In control conditions (Figure 9A), the amplitude of ICa,L elicited by the first command pulse (b) was not inhibited and remained nearly constant during the successive repetitive pulses (c). The small decrease of the current (8±3% of the first pulse, n=5) during 1-minute application of repetitive stimulation was thought to be induced simply by Ca2+ channel rundown. Verapamil (1 μmol/L, Figure 9B) produced very little inhibition of Ca2+ current in the absence of test pulses (b), but blockade increased with repeated depolarizations (c). Conversely, in studies with the same pulse protocol, nifedipine blockade was different (Figure 9C). The first current after the quiescent period gave a good estimate of the final level of blockade (b and c). Figure 9D shows the use-dependent effects of troglitazone 10 μmol/L. As in the case of nifedipine, the inward current elicited by the first command pulse after a 2-minute quiescent period was consistently inhibited by 63±10% (n=5, P<0.01), which was different from that recorded with verapamil. With the repetitive stimulations, the inward current decreased slightly, by 13±7% (n=5) from the first pulse during repetitive stimulation (Figure 9D, b), but could not discriminate the simple rundown of the Ca2+ channel. These results suggest that troglitazone inhibited ICa,L mainly in a use-independent manner.
The influence of the holding potential on the inhibitory effects of nifedipine and troglitazone was compared as shown in Figure 10. In these experiments, the command voltage steps (320 ms in duration) to +10 mV from a holding potential of −40 or −80 mV, where the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents consisted primarily of ICa,L, were applied. The peak amplitude of ICa,L in the absence of drugs was normalized to 100. The percentage inhibition induced by nifedipine and troglitazone is shown in Figure 10B. Nifedipine 1 μmol/L reduced the amplitude of ICa,L by 96±4% at a holding potential of −40 mV, whereas it inhibited it by only 34±8% at a holding potential of −80 mV. Conversely, troglitazone 10 μmol/L inhibited ICa,L by ≈70% at each membrane potential. Furthermore, the effects of troglitazone and nifedipine on the voltage-dependent availability of L-type Ca2+ channels were examined by means of double-pulse protocols (Figure 11). The test pulse to +10 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV was preceded by a 3-second conditioning pulse to various membrane potentials. The relationships between membrane potentials and the f∞ value in the absence and presence of the drug were fitted by the following Boltzmann equation using the least-squares method: f∞(V)=f∞max/{1+exp[(V−a)/b]}, where f∞max is the maximal value of f∞ (in control conditions, the value of f∞max=1), V is membrane potential in mV, a is membrane potential at 1/2 f∞max, and b is slope factor. In the absence of the drug, f∞max=1, a=−21.2 mV, and b=5.13 mV. In the presence of nifedipine 1 μmol/L, f∞max=0.68, a=−37.0 mV, and b=6.6 mV (Figure 11A). Thus, nifedipine decreased the maximal Ca2+ channel availability (0.69±0.05 of the control, n=5), with a significant shift of the curve toward the negative (−18±4 mV, n=5). Conversely, in the absence of troglitazone 10 μmol/L, f∞max=1, a=−21.3 mV, and b=5.33 mV. In the presence of troglitazone, f∞max=0.39, a=−22.3 mV, and b=6.0 mV (Figure 11B). Thus, troglitazone reduced the maximal Ca2+ channel availability (0.36±0.1 of control, n=5) but did not show any significant shift of the voltage-dependent inactivation curve (−23.4±3.4 mV in the control versus −25.9±5.0 mV in the presence of troglitazone, n=5, P=NS).
Discussion
We have demonstrated here that troglitazone had inhibitory effects on voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in single atrial myocytes from the guinea pig. The inward Ba2+ current in place of Ca2+ could easily be divided into 2 components with distinct physiological properties, as described in mammalian cardiac myocytes.30313233 One component had characteristics identical to the ICa,L, including slow inactivation (Figure 6) and sensitivity to dihydropyridine (Figures 9 and 10) and isoproterenol (Figure 4). The second component, ICa,T, had a fast inactivation (Figures 6 and 7) and small amplitude (≈−100 pA) even in the presence of Ba2+ and insensitivity to dihydropyridine (nifedipine 1 μmol/L) and isoproterenol (data not shown). We found that troglitazone inhibited both types of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in atrial myocytes, although it inhibited ICa,L more effectively than ICa,T. Thus, the effects of troglitazone on Ca2+ currents might not be restricted to L-type Ca2+ channels, in comparison with the classic Ca2+ channel antagonists nifedipine and verapamil, because nifedipine and verapamil 1 μmol/L did not inhibit ICa,T significantly (data not shown). Troglitazone 1 μmol/L reduced ICa,L by 10% to 20% within 2 minutes of application, and 10 μmol/L troglitazone reduced it by 60% to 80%. Troglitazone 30 μmol/L almost completely abolished ICa,L, and the IC50 value was estimated at 6.3 μmol/L. The inhibitory potency of troglitazone on ICa,L was less than that of nifedipine and verapamil. However, because the therapeutic plasma concentration of troglitazone was estimated to be 0.6 to 2.7 μmol/L,35 these concentrations are nearly the same as those required for the inhibition of ICa,L in this study. Thus, troglitazone may affect cardiac function by inhibiting the channel. The direct evidence showing that troglitazone inhibits ICa,L has been shown in vascular smooth muscle cells.2526 The IC50 of troglitazone on ICa,L of vascular smooth muscle cells was ≈3 μmol/L,26 which was relatively lower than that in the present study. However, we conclude that troglitazone inhibited the L-type Ca2+ channels in cardiac myocytes as well as vascular smooth muscle cells in therapeutic concentrations.
It has been reported that voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel blockers such as verapamil and diltiazem prevent the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy.161718 These cardioprotective effects of Ca2+-blocking drugs have also been reported in Syrian cardiomyopathic hamsters36 and in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.37 Therefore, the mode of action of troglitazone on ICa,L was compared with that of the classic Ca2+ antagonists verapamil and nifedipine. As shown in Figures 10 and 11, troglitazone reduced ICa,L but did not cause a significant shift in the steady-state inactivation curve. Conversely, nifedipine, a dihydropyridine Ca2+ antagonist, which has a high affinity for the inactivated state of the channel but much less affinity for other states (eg, closed, open), showed strong voltage-dependent effects and caused a distinct negative shift of the steady-state inactivation curve. Thus, it is unlikely that troglitazone inhibits ICa,L by preferentially binding the inactivated states of the channels. Also, troglitazone did not exhibit significant use-dependent characteristics, which was different from verapamil (Figure 9), as previously described.38 Potencies of the use-dependent inhibition might be closely related to the ionization constants of the drug as shown by Sanguinetti and Kass.39 According to this model, charged forms of the drug can reach their receptors inside the channel by a hydrophilic pathway available only when the channel gates are open and hence are characterized by a significant use-dependent block. In contrast, an uncharged form of the drug easily reaches its receptors via a hydrophobic region of the membrane without channel opening and thereby does not show significant use-dependent effects. Verapamil (pKa=8.7) is almost entirely in the charged form at pH 7.4, whereas troglitazone (pKa=6.1)40 exists almost entirely in the neutral form at the same pH. Thus, opening of the channels may not be necessary for troglitazone to affect ICa,L, as shown in Figure 9. Furthermore, the time courses of Ca2+ current decay were little affected by troglitazone. From these observations, troglitazone did not appear to inhibit the Ca2+ channels by binding to activated Ca2+ channels. Thus, the mechanisms by which troglitazone affects the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are unknown at present, but troglitazone may interact with L-type Ca2+ channels in a manner distinct from the classic Ca2+ antagonists.41
The present study indicates that troglitazone inhibited the voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents (ICa,L and ICa,T) in cardiac myocytes in therapeutic concentrations. Under normal circumstances, the current through the T-type Ca2+ channel is unlikely to be very important in atrial and ventricular myocytes, because in a well-polarized cell, such as atrial and ventricular cells, Na current is much larger and activates in a similar voltage range. Also, because L-type Ca2+ channels inactivate more slowly, they are likely to be more important than T-type channels. However, T-type Ca2+ channels may contribute to the generation of pacemaker activities in pacemaker cells42 and may make hypertrophied ventricular myocytes more prone to spontaneous action potentials and increase the likelihood of arrhythmia in partially depolarized hypertrophied myocardium.43 Troglitazone may affect the electrical activities under these conditions by inhibiting ICa,T. Conversely, troglitazone inhibited ICa,L more effectively than ICa,T. The inhibitory effects of troglitazone on ICa,L did not show significant voltage- and use-dependent properties as observed in classic Ca2+ antagonists.38 From these unique actions, troglitazone may inhibit cardiac Ca2+ channels in a similar way in well-polarized cells as well as in partially depolarized cells. Also, it may antagonize the effects of isoproterenol on ICa,L. Several studies have shown that in diabetic animals, the duration of action potential in cardiac myocytes is markedly longer, whereas the resting membrane potential is not altered.9101112 In addition, an augmented number of Ca2+ antagonist receptor binding sites and an increase of voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels have been reported in diabetic hearts.1314 The increased influx of Ca2+ through the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels may cause Ca2+ overload, which appears to be linked to the cardiac pathology in diabetic cardiomyopathy.161718 The present study shows that troglitazone inhibits voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents (ICa,T and ICa,L) and then antagonizes the effects of isoproterenol in cardiac myocytes, which may play a role in preventing diabetes-induced intracellular Ca2+ overload and then myocardial changes. In fact, recent studies have shown that troglitazone attenuates high-glucose–induced abnormalities in relaxation and intracellular calcium in rat ventricular myocytes23 and improves cardiac function in diabetes mellitus.24 From these observations, troglitazone may be a unique agent for diabetic cardiomyopathy, but further studies are needed to clarify this possibility in diabetic patients.

Figure 1. Effects of troglitazone (Tro) on voltage-dependent ICa,L in single guinea pig atrial myocytes. Cell was held at −40 mV, and command voltage pulses (320 ms in duration) to +0 mV were applied at 0.2 Hz. Bath contained normal Tyrode’s solution with 0.1% DMSO and 5 mmol/L BaCl2. B, Time courses of alterations of ICa,L amplitude. Drug sequences are also shown. Original current traces are indicated in absence (a) and in presence of troglitazone 10 and 30 μmol/L (b, d), after washout (c, e), and after application of Cd2+ (1 mmol/L, f). Zero current level is shown as lines in A. Amplitude of ICa,L was measured from zero current level. Current traces obtained at times indicated by a through f in B are shown in A (a through f).

Figure 2. Effects of troglitazone (Tro) on voltage-dependent ICa,L. Cell was held at −40 mV, and command voltage pulses (320 ms in duration) were applied at 0.2 Hz to various membrane potentials. In A, original current traces are shown in control (a) and in presence of troglitazone 5 μmol/L (b) and 30 μmol/L (c). Current-voltage relationships of ICa,L peak in absence and presence of troglitazone 5 and 30 μmol/L obtained by subtraction from ICa,L peak amplitude in original trace (A) to current level in presence of Cd2+ (1 mmol/L) are shown in B.

Figure 3. Concentration-dependent inhibition of ICa,L by troglitazone (Tro) in atrial myocytes. Cell was perfused by normal Tyrode’s solution with 0.1% DMSO. Cell was held at −40 mV (Vh=−40 mV), and command voltage steps (320 ms in duration) to +0 mV (Vc0 mV) were applied at 0.2 Hz. Current traces in A are shown in absence or presence of various concentrations of troglitazone. B, Concentration-dependent inhibition of troglitazone on ICa,L in atrial myocytes. Amplitude of peak of ICa,L after application of troglitazone was compared with control value. Percentage inhibition of troglitazone on ICa,L is plotted. Mean±SD is indicated (n=6 in each case).

Figure 4. Inhibitory effects of isoproterenol-stimulated ICa,L by troglitazone (Tro). Cells were held at −40 mV, and command voltage steps to +0 mV were applied at 0.2 Hz. Current traces are shown in control (a) and after application of isoproterenol 1 μmol/L without and with troglitazone 30 μmol/L (b, c). Time courses of changes in amplitude of ICa,L are shown on lower part.

Figure 5. Effects of troglitazone on cAMP-enhanced ICa,L. Patch pipette contained 100 μmol/L cAMP. Immediately after rupture of membrane, current traces were monitored continuously. Time courses of changes in amplitude of ICa,L are shown in B. Current traces in A (a through c) obtained at times indicated in B are shown. In D, current-voltage relationships of peak ICa,L are shown in absence and presence of troglitazone (30 μmol/L) in a cAMP-loaded cell. Original current traces are shown in C (a, b).

Figure 6. Voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in guinea pig atrial myocytes. A, Cell was held at −40 mV (Vh=−40 mV) and −80 mV (Vh=−80 mV), respectively, and command voltage pulses (Vc, 320 ms in duration) were applied at 0.2 Hz to various membrane potentials. Bath was perfused with high-TEA solution with TTX 10 μmol/L in place of Na+. Extracellular Ca2+ was totally replaced by 5 mmol/L Ba2+, and patch pipette contained CsCl internal solution with 10 mmol/L EGTA and 2 mmol/L BAPTA. Original current traces obtained at a holding potential of −40 and −80 mV are shown at various command voltage steps. B, Current traces subtracted from current of a holding potential of −80 to that of −40 mV at a command potential of −30, −20, and +0 mV. C, Current-voltage relationship of peak of voltage-dependent Ca2+ current are shown for a holding potential of −40 mV (○) and −80 mV (□). Note that transient component (arrows) was observed at command steps (−40 and −20 mV) from a holding potential of −80 mV.

Figure 7. Effects of troglitazone (Tro) on voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents in cardiac myocytes. Bath was perfused with TEA solution containing TTX 10 μmol/L, and bath contained 5 mmol/L Ba2+ in place of Ca2+. Cells were held at −80 mV (Vh=−80 mV). ICa,L and ICa,T were elicited by a depolarizing pulse (Vc) to +10 mV and −30 mV, respectively. Current traces in A are shown in absence or presence of troglitazone 10 μmol/L. B, percentage inhibition of ICa,L and ICa,T by troglitazone 10 μmol/L is shown. Amplitude of peak of Ca2+ current after application of troglitazone is compared with control value. Percentage inhibition of troglitazone on each type of Ca2+ current is plotted. Mean±SD is indicated (n=4 in each case). *P<0.05.

Figure 8. Effects of troglitazone (Tro) on time courses of inactivation of voltage-dependent ICa,L. Cells were held at −40 mV, and command voltage pulses to +0 mV were applied at 0.2 Hz. Inactivation time courses were well fitted by 2 exponentials: ICa,L=A1 exp(−t/τ1) and A2 exp(−t/τ2). ICa,L (control, A)=−647 (pA) exp(−t/5.62 ms)−354 (pA) exp(−t/42 ms); and troglitazone 10 μmol/L (B), ICa,L=−183 (pA) exp(−t/6.92 ms)−122 (pA) exp(−t/42 ms).

Figure 9. Use-dependent inhibition of ICa,L by troglitazone (Tro), verapamil, and nifedipine. Cells were held at −40 mV, and command voltage pulses to +0 mV (320 ms in duration) were applied at 0.2 Hz. Cells were perfused with normal Tyrode’s solution. Protocols perfusing verapamil 1 μmol/L (B), nifedipine 1 μmol/L (C), and troglitazone 10 μmol/L (D) are indicated by bars in E. Current traces (a through c) in A through D were obtained at times indicated in E, a through c. Time courses for changes in amplitude of ICa,L during perfusion of each drug are plotted in E. Amplitude of ICa,L was subtracted from control level for current in presence of Cd2+ 1 mmol/L and normalized against amplitude of ICa,L just before pulses were stopped (a). After voltage steps were stopped, bath was superfused in control Tyrode’s solution with or without troglitazone, nifedipine, or verapamil. After ≈2 minutes in control or drug-containing solution, repetitive depolarizing pulses to +0 mV were reapplied at 0.2 Hz. First pulse reapplied was indicated as b.

Figure 10. Voltage-dependent inhibition of ICa,L by nifedipine and troglitazone (Tro). Cells were held at −80 mV (Vh=−80 mV) and −40 mV (Vh=−40 mV), respectively, and command voltage pulses (Vc, 320 ms in duration) were applied at 0.2 Hz to +10 mV. Bath was perfused with TEA solution with TTX 10 μmol/L, and 5 mmol/L Ba2+ was added to bath solution in place of Ca2+. In B, percentage inhibition of ICa,L by nifedipine and troglitazone is shown at each holding potential. Amplitude of ICa,L peak after application of these agents was compared with control level. Mean±SD is indicated (n=5 in each case). *P<0.05.

Figure 11. Effects of troglitazone (Tro) and nifedipine on voltage-dependent inactivation of ICa,L. Quasi–steady-state inactivation parameters (f∞) of ICa,L were obtained by use of a double-pulse protocol in absence and presence of nifedipine 1 μmol/L (A) and troglitazone 10 μmol/L (B). Conditioning voltage steps (3 seconds in duration) were applied to various membrane potentials between −70 and +10 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV. Ten milliseconds after each conditioning pulse, a test pulse to +10 mV (200 ms in duration) was applied to elicit ICa,L. Relative amplitude of ICa,L in response to test pulse was plotted at membrane potential of each conditioning pulse. Relationships between membrane potential and f∞ in control (in control condition, value of f∞max=1) and under application of drugs (nifedipine or troglitazone) were fitted by Boltzmann equation. Normalized inactivation curves (f∞) in presence of nifedipine (A) and troglitazone (B) fitted by Boltzmann equation are shown as an extra curve of A and B.
| Condition | Parameter | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1, pA | τ1, ms | A2, pA | τ2, ms | ||||
| Control | −705 ±376 | 4.8±0.8 | −419±68 | 31.2±2.4 | |||
| Troglitazone 10 μmol/L | −336±2371 | 5.4±0.9 | −246±1261 | 33.3 ±6.0 | |||
Footnotes
References
- 1 Regan TJ, Ettinger PO, Khan MI, Jesrani MU, Lyons MM, Oldewurtel HA, Weber M. Altered myocardial function and metabolism in chronic diabetes mellitus without ischemia in dogs. Circ Res.1973; 35:222–237.Google Scholar
- 2 Hamby RI, Zoneraich S, Sherman S. Diabetic cardiomyopathy. JAMA.1974; 229:1749–1754.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 3 Garber DW, Neely JR. Decreased myocardial function and myosin ATPase in hearts from diabetic rats. Am J Physiol.1983; 244:H586–H591.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 4 Galderisi M, Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Levy D. Echocardiographic evidence for existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol.1991; 68:85–89.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 5 Penpargkul S, Fein F, Sonnenblick EH, Scheuer J. Depressed cardiac sarcoplasmic reticular function from diabetic rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1981; 13:303–309.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 6 Kjeldsen K, Braendgaard H, Sidenius P, Larsen JS, Norgaard A. Diabetes decreases Na+-K+ pump concentration in skeletal muscle, heart ventricular muscle, and peripheral nerves of rat. Diabetes.1987; 36:842–848.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 7 Makino N, Dhalla KS, Elimban V, Dhalla NS. Sarcolemmal Ca2+ transport in streptozotocin-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats. Am J Physiol.1987; 253:E202–E207.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 8 Pierce GN, Dhalla NS. Heart mitochondrial function in chronic experimental diabetes in rats. Can J Cardiol.1985; 1:48–54.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 9 Nobe S, Aomine M, Arita M, Ito S, Takaki R. Chronic diabetes mellitus prolongs action potential duration of rat ventricular muscles: circumstantial evidence for impaired Ca2+ channel. Cardiovasc Res.1990; 24:381–389.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 10 Magyar J, Rusznak Z, Szentesi P, Szucs G, Kovacs L. Action potentials and potassium currents in rat ventricular muscle during experimental diabetes. J Mol Cell Cardiol.1992; 24:841–853.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 11 Jourdon P, Feuvray D. Calcium and potassium currents in ventricular myocytes isolated from diabetic rats. J Physiol.1993; 470:411–429.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 12 Shimoni Y, Firek L, Severson D, Giles W. Short-term diabetes alters K+ currents in rat ventricular myocytes. Circ Res.1994; 74:620–628.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 13 Nishio Y, Kashiwagi A, Ogawa T, Asahina T, Ikebuchi M, Kodama M, Shigeta Y. Increase in [3H]PN 200–110 binding to cardiac muscle membrane in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes.1990; 39:1064–1069.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 14 Gotzsche LB, Rosenqvist N, Gronback H, Flyvbjerg A, Gotzsche O. Increased number of myocardial voltage-gated Ca2+ channel and unchanged total β-receptor number in long-term streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Eur J Endocrinol.1996; 134:107–113.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 15 Nagase N, Tamura Y, Kobayashi S, Saito K, Saito M, Niki T, Chikamori K, Mori H. Myocardial disorders of hereditary diabetic KK mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1981;13(suppl 2):70. Abstract.Google Scholar
- 16 Afzal N, Ganguly PK, Dhalla KS, Pierce GN, Singal PK, Dhalla NS. Beneficial effects of verapamil in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes.1988; 37:936–942.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 17 Afzal N, Pierce GN, Elimban V, Beamish RE, Dhalla NS. Influence of verapamil on some subcellular defects in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol.1989; 256:E453–E458.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 18 Fein FS, Cho S, Malhotra A, Akella J, vanHoeven KH, Sonnenblick EH, Factor SM. Beneficial effects of diltiazem on the natural history of hypertensive diabetic cardiomyopathy in rats. J Am Coll Cardiol.1991; 18:1406–1417.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 19 Suter SL, Nolan JJ, Wallace P, Gumbiner B, Olefsky M. Metabolic effects of new oral hypoglycemic agent CS-045 in NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care.1992; 15:193–203.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 20 Nolan JJ, Ludvik B, Beerdsen P, Joyce M, Olefsky J. Improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin resistance in obese subjects treated with troglitazone. N Engl J Med.1994; 331:1188–1193.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 21 Schwartz S, Raskin P, Fonseca V, Graveline JF. Effects of troglitazone in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med.1998; 338:861–866.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 22 Inzucchi SE, Maggs DG, Spollett GR, Page SL, Rife FS, Walton V, Shulman GI. Efficacy and metabolic effects of metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med.1998; 338:867–872.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 23 Ren J, Dominguez LJ, Sowers JR, Davidoff AJ. Troglitazone attenuates high-glucose-induced abnormalities in relaxation and intracellular calcium in rat ventricular myocytes. Diabetes.1996; 45:1822–1825.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 24 Ghazzi MN, Perez JE, Antonucci TK, Driscoll JH, Huang SM, Faja BW, Whitcomb RW, the Troglitazone Study Group. Cardiac and glycemic benefits of troglitazone treatment in NIDDM. Diabetes.1997; 46:433–439.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 25 Song J, Walsh MF, Igwe R, Ram JL, Barazi M, Dominguez LJ, Sowers JR. Troglitazone reduces contraction by inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell Ca2+ currents and not endothelial nitric oxide production. Diabetes.1997; 46:659–664.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 26 Nakamura Y, Ohya Y, Onaka U, Fujii K, Abe I, Fujishima M. Inhibitory action of insulin-sensitizing agents on calcium channels in smooth muscle cells from resistance arteries of guinea-pig. Br J Pharmacol.1998; 123:675–682.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 27 Kurachi Y, Nakajima T, Sugimoto T. On the mechanism of activation of muscarinic K+ channels by adenosine in isolated atrial cells: involvement of GTP-binding proteins. Pflugers Arch.1986; 407:264–274.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 28 Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch.1981; 391:85–100.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 29 Yatani A, Codina J, Imoto Y, Reeves JP, Birnbaumer L, Brown AM. A G protein directly regulates mammalian cardiac calcium channels. Science.1987; 238:1288–1292.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 30 Bean BP. Two kinds of calcium channels in canine atrial cells: differences in kinetics, selectivity, and pharmacology. J Gen Physiol.1985; 86:1–30.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 31 Mitra R, Morad M. Two types of calcium channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1986; 83:5340–5344.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 32 Cerbai E, Klockner U, Isenberg G. Ca-antagonistic effects of adenosine in guinea pig atrial cells. Am J Physiol.1988; 255:H872–H878.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 33 Tytgat J, Nilius B, Vereecke J, Carmeliet E. The T-type Ca channel in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes is insensitive to isoproterenol. Pflugers Arch.1988; 411:704–706.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 34 Nakajima T, Takikawa R, Sugimoto T, Kurachi Y. Effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on membrane currents in mammalian cardiac myocytes. Pflugers Arch.1991; 419:644–650.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 35 Shibata H, Nii S, Kobayashi M, Izumi T, Sasahara K, Yamaguchi K. Phase I study of a new hypoglycemic agent CS-045 in healthy volunteers: safety and pharmacokinetics in reported administration[in Japanese]. Rinsho Iyaku.1993; 9:1519–1537.Google Scholar
- 36 Wagner JA, Reynolds IJ, Weisman HF, Dudeck P, Weisfeldt ML, Snyder SH. Calcium antagonist receptors in cardiomyopathic hamster: selective increases in heart, muscle, brain. Science.1986; 232:515–518.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 37 Chatterjee K, Raff G, Anderson D, William W, Parmley W. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: therapy with slow channel inhibiting agents. Prog Cardiovasc Dis.1982; 25:193–209.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 38 Lee KS, Tsien RW. Mechanism of calcium channel blockade by verapamil, D600, diltiazem and nitrendipine in single dialysed heart cells. Nature.1983; 302:790–794.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 39 Sanguinetti MC, Kass RS. Voltage-dependent block of calcium channel current in the calf cardiac Purkinje fiber by dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists. Circ Res.1984; 55:336–348.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 40 Horikoshi H, Yoshioka T, Kawasaki T, Nakamura K, Matsunuma N, Yamaguchi K, Sasahara, K. Troglitazone (CS-045), a new antidiabetic drug. Annu Rep Sankyo Res Lab.1994; 46:1–57.Google Scholar
- 41 Spedding M, Paoletti R. Classification of calcium channels and the sites of action of drugs modifying channel function. Pharmacol Rev.1992; 44:363–376.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 42 Hagiwara N, Irisawa H, Kameyama M. Contribution of two types of calcium currents to the pacemaker potentials of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol.1988; 395:233–253.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 43 Nuss HB, Houser SR. T-type Ca2+ current is expressed in hypertrophied adult feline left ventricular myocytes. Circ Res.1993; 73:777–782.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar


