Skip main navigation
×

Glucocorticoid Modulates Vasodilator Response of Mesenteric Arterioles in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.27.1.114Hypertension. 1996;27:114–118

    Abstract

    Abstract We previously reported that the response of the arterioles in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) to histamine is blunted compared with that in normotensive control rats (Wistar-Kyoto rats [WKY]). The present study was designed to analyze the extent to which this blunted arteriolar response may be attributed in SHR to the concurrent elevation of circulating glucocorticoids through the use of adrenalectomy with and without dexamethasone supplementation. Mesenteric arterioles were observed by intravital microscopy under general anesthesia, and their lumen diameters were measured after histamine superfusion. The concentration-response curve with histamine was compared with that of an endothelium-independent vasodilator, sodium nitroprusside. At the end of each experiment, papaverine was applied topically to determine the maximal diameter for each vessel, from which a measure of arteriolar tone could be computed. The arteriolar tone in sham-operated SHR is set at a higher steady-state level than in sham-operated WKY. The concentration required for a 50% dilator response (EC50) of histamine in adrenalectomized SHR was restored to the level of WKY. Adrenalectomy did not significantly affect the EC50 of histamine in WKY. When adrenalectomized SHR received a supplement of dexamethasone, the arteriolar response was found to show the same refractory pattern to histamine as sham-operated SHR. In contrast, the EC50 of sodium nitroprusside in sham-operated and adrenalectomized SHR was similar to that in sham-operated WKY. Our results indicate that the impaired dilator response to histamine in SHR is related to an enhanced adrenal glucocorticoid secretion.

    The progressive development of hypertension in SHR is associated with a shift in hemodynamic resistance. During this period a greater than normal level of arteriolar tone in the skeletal muscle microcirculation of SHR can be demonstrated, to the smallest precapillary ramifications of the terminal arterioles (15 to 20 μm).1 Among the factors that have been proposed to account for the increase in arteriolar resistance are smooth muscle medial hypertrophy,2 rarefaction,3 and an elevation of tone in resistance arteries.4 The precise causal and temporal interrelation between the factors leading to this upward displacement of arteriolar tone and the hypertension per se remains largely speculative.

    In light of the fact that circulating corticosteroid levels are markedly elevated in SHR5678 it was proposed that various vascular manifestations of the hypertensive condition may involve glucocorticoid pathways.9 Ancillary evidence is provided by the facts that progression of the SHR syndrome is associated with a hypertrophy of the cortical zones of the adrenal glands10 and that the hypertensive state can be prevented by adrenalectomy or by hypophysectomy. The demonstration that corticosterone supplementation in SHR was found to restore hypertension after adrenalectomy further strengthens the possibility that glucocorticoids per se may be a key factor in the development of hypertension.11

    We recently observed that recruitment of leukocytes in SHR is blunted when stimulated with proinflammatory stimuli.12131415 At the same time we noted a less striking response of the arterioles to such proinflammatory substances.13 In this context we reported that the blunted response under steady-state conditions to histamine treatment appeared to be mediated by way of an endothelial cell–dependent pathway in mesenteric arterioles of SHR.16

    Accordingly, the present intravital microscopic protocol was designed to clarify the contribution of adrenal glucocorticoids to the atypical arteriolar response to histamine in SHR. In particular, the analysis is designed to measure mesenteric arteriolar dilator response after topical application of histamine, an endothelium-dependent mediator, compared with sodium nitroprusside, an endothelium-independent dilator. The behavior of the small arterioles (20 to 35 μm) was used as a framework for the following reasons. (1) The arterioles in this range are physically aligned separately from the adjacent venules or lymphatics so that a vasodilation independent of adjacent endothelium could be assessed. (2) The arterioles in such a hierarchical subdivision offer a clear image, and there are small differences in the intravascular pressure levels between SHR and WKY compared with large arterioles.

    Methods

    Rat Preparation

    All rat procedures were previously reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego, Animal Subject Committee. SHR (n=18) and WKY (n=18) (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) were used for the study. Twelve SHR and 12 WKY were subjected to bilateral adrenalectomy, and 6 SHR and 6 WKY were subjected to sham surgery at 12 weeks and studied at 13 weeks.1517 The cohort of adrenalectomized SHR and WKY was fed and watered ad libitum with standard rat chow and with saline in the drinking water and were maintained in a light-controlled holding facility for 1 week. The sham-operated SHR and WKY were fed and watered ad libitum standard rat chow and water.101517 The animals appeared alert and in good health. All experiments were performed at the same time of day (11 am to 2 pm). Completeness of the adrenalectomy was verified by postmortem examination of the suprarenal region. To explore the relation of adrenocortical secretions to the observed vascular sequelae, in SHR we resorted to adrenalectomy with and without replacement therapy.

    Blood Pressure Measurement

    Each rat was maintained under general pentobarbital sodium anesthesia (30 mg/kg IM) as part of the routine for in vivo microscopy, arranged on a heating pad, and covered with a blanket heated to 37°C. A catheter (polyethylene PE-50 tubing, Clay Adams) was inserted into the femoral artery, and mean arterial pressure was measured.18 Blood pressure was continuously monitored during the entire period of microvascular observation from which average values were calculated. In a previous study15 we showed that the mean arterial blood pressure exhibited an only modestly lower value (10% to 15%) after general anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium compared with levels prevailing after a catheterization under local anesthesia (4% lidocaine hydrochloride SC, Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc). Comparable minor reductions in blood pressure were seen during general anesthesia in the four groups used here (sham WKY, sham SHR, adrenalectomized WKY, and adrenalectomized SHR).1517

    Intravital Microscopic Observation of Mesentery

    The abdomen was opened by a small midline incision. The ileocecal part of the mesentery was exteriorized carefully and draped over a plastic support for intravital microscopy as described previously.14 The preparation was kept at 37°C and continuously superfused (1.0 mL/min) with a Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate-buffered solution saturated with 95% N2/5% CO2. Interruption of the suffusion over the tissue was avoided, since even short drying was found to result in rapid cell injury as assessed previously by intravital staining with propidium iodide.19

    The mesenteric microcirculation was visualized through an intravital microscope (×55 water immersion objective lens, Leitz) using a digital color CCD camera (DEI-470, Optronics Engineering). Single, unbranched arterioles with a diameter between 20 and 35 μm and a length of ≈50 μm were selected for study. The images were stored in a videocassette recorder (model AG-127OP, Panasonic) for playback analysis. Vessel diameters were measured off-line with a video image–shearing monitor (model 907 IPM). All diameters reported in this study refer to inner lumen measurements at the magnification provided by a ×55 objective lens with final magnification ×2000 on the screen of the television monitor (CT-1383 VY, Panasonic).

    After a 20-minute period was observed to allow hemodynamic parameters to reach steady state, concentration-response curves were determined by adding each vasodilator individually (histamine dihydrochloride and sodium nitroprusside, Sigma Chemical Co) in 10-fold increments (10−8 to 10−3 mol/L) to the Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate superfusate solution.16 The arterioles were observed at each concentration for 20 minutes. Separate sets of rats were used for each dilator. After the diameter response at the highest concentration was recorded, maximal vasodilation was induced by topical application of papaverine 1.0 mg/mL. This dilator is used routinely for such measurements because it interacts directly with the smooth muscle cell and does not involve any specific receptor pathway. The initial measurements made for a particular concentration at steady state provided the values for dss. Measurements after application of papaverine provided dmax values. The 1.0-mg/mL dose of papaverine was sufficient to eliminate evidence of active tone in the arterioles because no further vessel dilation was observed at constant pressure with the addition of any other vasodilator.1 Topical application of papaverine did not affect the arterial blood pressure, which was monitored throughout the experimental protocol.

    The level of arteriolar tone (T) was computed as T=(dmax−dss)/dmax. As such, T is a nondimensional parameter that serves to reflect the degree of active smooth muscle constriction such that T=0% in dilated vessels and T=100% in fully constricted vessels with an occluded lumen.1 dss was computed for vessels that exhibited vasomotion as a time average over at least 10 vasomotor cycles.

    As a further precaution possible mast cell degranulation, which might have been caused by the surgical handling of the ileocecal mesentery, was evaluated at the end of each experiment by superfusion of 0.1% toluidine blue solution for 30 minutes. After staining is completed, mast cells that show degranulation can be identified by the presence of metachromatic granules in the contiguous extracellular space.20 After toluidine blue staining was completed, the microscopic field under observation together with 3 to 4 surrounding fields was scanned to determine the percentage of mast cells that were degranulated. In tissues in which >10% of the mast cells showed degranulation the data were discarded to minimize the influence of an unregulated cofactor on endogenous histamine release from the mast cells.

    Steroid Intervention

    To assess the effects of glucocorticoids on blood pressure and arteriolar behavior in the adrenalectomized rats,15 dexamethasone 21-acetate (Sigma Chemical Co) was injected into a separate group of rats at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg body wt per day IM for 5 days, in line with a previous method.61517

    Statistical Analysis

    Statistical differences between the two animal strains and treatment modalities were determined by one-way layout ANOVA and Scheffé’s-type multiple comparison test. All values are expressed as mean±SD. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

    Results

    Sham-operated SHR under general anesthesia were used as a point of departure because mean arterial blood pressure remained significantly higher than normal, at a level of 166±9.3 mm Hg compared with 102.0±11.1 mm Hg for the sham-operated WKY (Table 1).

    In the present experiment arterioles with the same range of dmax values were sampled in two strains. We emphasize that the average dmax value was not significantly different among the groups (Table 2), in line with previous measurements.117

    A concentration-dependent reduction of arteriolar tone occurred in response to topical histamine in sham-operated as well as adrenalectomized SHR both with and without dexamethasone supplementation (Fig 1). The magnitude of the response in sham-operated SHR was significantly less than in sham-operated WKY for all concentrations between 10−8 and 10−4 mol/L (Fig 1). The EC50 value of histamine with respect to the tone response in sham-operated SHR (2.8×10−4 mol/L, Fig 1, bottom, ○) was ≈40 times higher than in sham-operated WKY (6.8×10−6 mol/L, Fig 1, top, ○)(P<.05).

    After adrenalectomy, the elevated EC50 value of histamine for the tone response in SHR decreased significantly (4.4×10−6 mol/L, Fig 1, bottom, •)(P<.05), to the level characteristic of sham-operated WKY. Such a decrease in the EC50 values in the adrenalectomized SHR could be prevented by supplementation with dexamethasone (1.0×10−3 mol/L, Fig 1, bottom, ▪) (P<.05). The EC50 value of histamine for the tone response in the adrenalectomized WKY and dexamethasone-supplemented, adrenalectomized WKY groups was 3.3×10−6 mol/L and 2.8×10−6 mol/L. A comparable range of values was present in the sham-operated WKY (Fig 1, top).

    When the endothelium-independent dilator sodium nitroprusside was used, the arteriolar tone response in SHR and WKY did not show the same trend as the response to histamine (Fig 2). There were no differences in the EC50 value between the sham-operated SHR (1.0×10−6 mol/L, Fig 2, bottom, ○) and sham-operated WKY (2.0×10−6 mol/L, Fig 2, top, ○). In both adrenalectomized cohorts the EC50 values for sodium nitroprusside fell into the same range (WKY, 2.0×10−6 mol/L; SHR, 1.7×10−6 mol/L, •). No significant differences were seen in the EC50 values between adrenalectomized, dexamethasone-supplemented WKY (1.2×10−6 mol/L, Fig 2, top, ▪) and dexamethasone-supplemented, adrenalectomized SHR (1.0×10−6 mol/L, Fig 2, bottom, ▪).

    Discussion

    The present results indicate that the mesenteric arterioles of SHR are refractory to the dilator action of histamine but not to sodium nitroprusside. Although a refractory state was no longer evident after bilateral adrenalectomy, this state could be restored with glucocorticoid supplementation (Fig 1).

    Several studies in the literature have reported that the vascular tone of arterioles is significantly elevated in hypertensive individuals.121 Although several specific modalities have been advanced to explain the upward displacement of steady-state arteriolar tone in SHR, this condition is likely to actually be the end result of several overlapping mechanisms acting in concert, including an increased myogenic response to elevated blood pressure,22 suppression of endothelial cell–derived relaxation,23 and a shift in neurogenic stimulation,24 among others. Previous investigations dealing with the microcirculation of hypertensive patients also reported morphological changes in the wall of arterioles25 and changes in the development of the arteriolar network,32627 which the authors of these reports thought could account for the elevation in peripheral resistance. In a recent report we showed that adrenalectomy served to prevent the development of the hypertension per se as well as enhanced arteriolar tone in SHR and that glucocorticoid but not mineralocorticoid supplementation served to restore increased blood pressure and arteriolar tone, emphasizing the importance of glucocorticoids in the development of hypertension (H.S., B.W.Z., G.W.S.-S. unpublished results, 1995).

    Although intravascular pressure in the smaller mesenteric arterioles of SHR and WKY has not been reported, according to the report of Bohlen28 of the arterioles of the wall of the intestine, the intravascular micropressures in the 20- to 35-μm mesenteric arterioles in SHR are moderately higher than those in WKY. Compared with the large difference in systemic blood pressure between SHR and WKY, however, the significance of this difference of intravascular pressures at this branching level between two strains is not as great. A myogenic effect due to the somewhat higher intravascular pressure is likely to be associated with the higher tone in SHR arterioles.

    A series of studies has demonstrated that histamine-induced relaxations were endothelium dependent.293031 We emphasize that there are differences in the endothelium-dependent vascular response among species and even between vessels in different tissues of the same species.32 For example the level of NO released by histamine in the guinea pig coronary circulation alone is believed to be sufficient to account for the increase in cGMP and the observed coronary vasodilation.33 In general our observations,16 in line with those of previous workers,3334 support the idea that the histamine-induced vasodilator response in the rat mesenteric arterioles is an endothelium-dependent phenomenon.

    In line with the proposal by Ignarro et al35 that the modes of action of sodium nitroprusside and NO are similar, the present measurements suggest that the actual release of NO is decreased in hypertensive individuals. Endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells from SHR vessels apparently are modified to release less NO than cells from WKY.23 Thus, the increase in flow associated with reduced arteriolar dilation in young SHR could be interpreted to be a consequence of an impairment of the NO-mediated part of the flow-dependent dilation.36 Such a sequela is in line with the observation that the arterioles in the SHR mesentery are refractory to endothelium-dependent vasodilators (histamine and acetylcholine).16 Although an enhanced level of superoxide anion production in mesenteric arteriolar endothelial cells of SHR is no longer present after adrenalectomy, an elevated level of oxidative stress can be reinstated by dexamethasone supplementation.17 In line with such a scenario, if endogenously produced NO in SHR was in turn consumed by an overproduction of superoxide anion, reactions involving an endothelium-derived NO-dependent vasodilator effect would in turn be attenuated. The activity of xanthine oxidase, a key enzyme associated with microvascular oxidative stress in SHR,17 is increased in SHR myocardium compared with that of WKY.37 Interestingly, epithelial cell gene expression of xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase are enhanced by glucocorticoid application.38 Glucocorticoids also blunt the induction of nitric oxide synthesis in smooth muscle.39 Because in the absence of a source of adrenal glucocorticoids the suppressed vasodilator response of the SHR arterioles to histamine is no longer evident (Fig 1, bottom), the present results provide additional indirect evidence for a link between glucocorticoids and the altered production of endothelium-derived vasoactive agents.

    In conclusion, the mechanism by which the dilator response of the arterioles to agents such as histamine is blunted in the SHR mesenteric microcirculation appears to be related to an elevation of adrenal glucocorticoid secretion in this genetic model of the hypertension syndrome.

    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

    dmax=maximal diameter
    dss=steady-state lumen diameter(s)
    NO=nitric oxide
    SHR=spontaneously hypertensive rat(s)
    WKY=Wistar-Kyoto rat(s)

    
          Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Concentration-response curves for mesenteric arteriolar tone in response to topical histamine in WKY (top) and SHR (bottom). *P<.05 compared with sham-operated groups; †P<.05 compared with adrenalectomy groups.

    
          Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Concentration-response curves for mesenteric arteriolar tone in response to topical sodium nitroprusside in WKY (top) and SHR (bottom). Three arterioles were investigated in each group; three arterioles were studied in each mesentery. *P<.05 compared with sham-operated groups.

    Table 1. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Under General Anesthesia

    Mean Arterial Blood Pressure, mm Hg
    WKY1SHR1
    Sham operation102.0±11.1166.0±9.32
    Adrenalectomy83.2±10.5106.4±9.83
    Adrenalectomy+dexamethasone105.4±5.8158.2 ±14.34

    Values are mean±SD.

    1n=6 rats for each value.

    2P<.05 compared with sham-operated WKY.

    3P<.05 compared with sham-operated SHR.

    4P<.05 compared with adrenalectomized SHR.

    Table 2. dmax After Application of Papaverine in Rat Mesentery

    dmax, μm
    WKY1SHR1
    Sham operation30.5±3.929.4±4.5
    Adrenalectomy31.4±5.030.9±4.8
    Adrenalectomy+dexamethasone28.6±6.731.7 ±5.6

    Values are mean±SD.

    1n=6 rats for each value.

    The research was supported by US Public Health Service grant HL-10881. This work was completed during the tenure of a Research Fellowship for Dr H. Suzuki from the American Heart Association, California Affiliate.

    Footnotes

    Correspondence to Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein, PhD, Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412.

    References

    • 1 Schmid-Schönbein GW, Zweifach BW, DeLano FA, Chen P. Microvascular tone in a skeletal muscle of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1987; 9:164-171. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Folkow B, Grimby G, Thulesius O. Adaptive structural changes of the vascular walls in hypertension and their relation to the control of the peripheral resistance. Acta Physiol Scand.1958; 44:255-272. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Hutchins PM, Darnell AE. Observations of a decreased number of small arterioles in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1974;34-35:161-165. Google Scholar
    • 4 Bohlen HG, Lobach D. In vivo study of microvascular wall characteristics and resting control in young and mature spontaneously hypertensive rats. Blood Vessels.1978; 15:322-330. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Iams SG, McMurthy JP, Wexler BC. Aldosterone, deoxycorticosterone, corticosterone, and prolactin changes during the lifespan of chronically and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Endocrinology.1979; 104:1357-1363. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Ruch W, Baumann JB, Häusler A, Otten UH, Siegl H, Girard J. Importance of the adrenal cortex for development and maintenance of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Endocrinologica.1984; 105:417-424. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Hattori T, Hashimoto K, Ota Z. Adrenocorticotropin responses to corticotropin releasing factor and vasopressin in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1986; 8:386-390. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Ardekani AM, Walker SJ, Donohue SJ, Stitzel RE, Connors JM, Vrana KE. Adrenocorticotropin and corticosterone levels in pre-weaning spontaneously hypertensive rats. Life Sci.1989; 44:919-925. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Whitworth JA. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced hypertension. Kidney Int.1987; 31:1213-1224. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Aoki K, Tankaw H, Fujinami T. Pathological studies on the endocrine organs of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Jpn Heart J.1963; 4:426-442. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Hashimoto K, Makino S, Hirasawa R, Takao T, Sugawara M, Murakami K. Abnormalities in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in spontaneously hypertensive rats during development of hypertension. Endocrinology.1989; 125:1161-1167. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Arendt H, Smith CW, Granger DN. Leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. Hypertension.1993; 21:667-673. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Schmid-Schönbein GW, Suematsu M, DeLano FA, Shen K, Zweifach BW. Functional alteration of microvascular endothelial cells and its correlation to leukocyte behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats. FASEB J.1993; 7:A901. Abstract. Google Scholar
    • 14 Suzuki H, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Suematsu M, DeLano FA, Forrest MJ, Miyasaka M, Zweifach BW. Impaired leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1994; 24:719-727. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Suzuki H, Zweifach BW, Forrest MJ, Schmid-Schönbein GW. Modification of leukocyte adhesion in spontaneously hypertensive rats by adrenal corticosteroids. J Leukoc Biol.1995; 57:20-26. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Suzuki H, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schönbein GW. Vascular response of mesenteric arterioles to histamine in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1995; 26:387-400. Google Scholar
    • 17 Suzuki H, Swei A, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schönbein GW. In vivo evidence for microvascular oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats: hydroethidine microfluorography. Hypertension.1995; 26:1083-1089. Google Scholar
    • 18 Zweifach BW, Kovalcheck S, DeLano FA, Chen P. Micropressure-flow relationship in a skeletal muscle of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1981; 3:601-614. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 19 DeLano FA, Suematsu M, Zweifach BW, Schmid-Schönbein GW. Topography and onset of cell injury in exteriorized organ preparations using microfluorography. FASEB J.1993; 7:A882. Google Scholar
    • 20 Suzuki H, Suematsu M, Yi S, Kurose I, Fukumura D, Miura S, Tsuchiya M. Mast cell degranulation during microcirculatory disturbances revealed by the toluidine blue-vital staining method. In: Tsuchiya M, Nagura H, Hibi T, Moro I, eds. Frontiers of Mucosal Immunology, Vol 2. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1991:549-550. Google Scholar
    • 21 Lombard JH, Hess ME, Stekiel WJ. Neural and local control of arterioles in SHR. Hypertension.1984; 6:530-535. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Meininger GA, Davis MJ. Cellular mechanisms involved in the vascular myogenic response. Am J Physiol.1992; 263:H647-H659. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Malinski T, Kapturczak M, Dayharsh J, Bohr D. Nitric oxide synthase activity in genetic hypertension. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.1993; 194:654-658. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Chapleau MK, Hajduczek H, Abboud FM. Paracrine modulation of baroreceptor activity by vascular endothelium. News Physiol Sci.1991; 6:210-214. Google Scholar
    • 25 Folkow B. Structural factor in primary and secondary hypertension. Hypertension.1990; 16:89-101. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Prewitt RL, Chen IIH, Dowell RF. Development of microvascular rarefaction in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Am J Physiol.1982; 243:H243-H251. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Mulvany MJ, Aalkjaer C. Structure and function of small arteries. Physiol Rev.1990; 70:921-962. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Bohlen HG. Intestinal microvascular adaptation during maturation of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.1983; 5:739-745. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Van de Voorde J, Leusen I. Role of endothelium in vasodilator response of rat thoracic aorta to histamine. Eur J Pharmacol.1983; 87:113-120. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30 Toda N. Endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by angiotensin II and histamine in isolated arteries of dog. Br J Pharmacol.1984; 18:301-307. Google Scholar
    • 31 Sercombe R, Verrechia C, Philipson V, Oudart N, Dimtriadow V, Bouchaud C, Seylaz J. Histamine induced constriction and dilatation of rabbit middle cerebral arteries in vitro: role of the endothelium. Blood Vessels.1986; 23:137-153. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Furchgott RF. Role of endothelium in response of vascular smooth muscle. Circ Res.1983; 53:557-573. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 33 Kelm M, Feelisch M, Krebber T, Motz W, Strauer BE. Mechanisms of histamine-induced coronary vasodilatation: H1-receptor-mediated release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. J Vasc Res.1993; 30:132-138. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Tayo F. Role of the endothelium and smooth muscle tone in the dilator response of the rabbit coeliac artery to histamine. J Pharm Pharmacol.1991; 43:396-400. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Ignarro LJ, Harbison RG, Wood KS, Kadowitz PJ. Dissimilarities between methylene blue and cyanide on relaxation and cyclic GMP formation in endothelium-intact intrapulmonary artery caused by nitrogen oxide-containing vasodilators and acetylcholine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.1986; 236:30-36. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Koller A, Huang A. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated flow-induced dilatation in arterioles of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res.1994; 74:416-421. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37 Janssen M, de Jung JW, Pasini E, Ferrari R. Myocardial xanthine oxidoreductase activity in hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic rats. Cardioscience.1993; 4:25-29. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38 Pfeffer KD, Huecksteadt TP, Hoidal JR. Xanthine dehydrogenase and xanthine oxidase activity and gene expression in renal epithelial cells. J Immunol.1994; 153:1789-1797. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 39 Rees DD, Celleck S, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Dexamethasone prevents the induction by endotoxin of nitric oxide synthase and the associated effects on vascular tone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.1990; 173:541-547.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar