Determination of Cognitive Hemispheric Lateralization by “Functional” Transcranial Doppler Cross-Validated by Functional MRI
To the Editor:
In their article on functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD), Schmidt et al1 conclude the fTCD can lateralize higher cognitive functions reliably. They suggest that it may be used in patients in the preoperative evaluation before brain surgery. But because “data to validate fTCD…are still lacking,” they caution that fTCD should be cross-checked with well established techniques (presumably the Wada test), particularly with regard to language dominance. Stroke published such a study (“Noninvasive Determination of Hemispheric Language Dominance Using Functional Transcranial Doppler Sonography: A Comparison With the Wada Test”)2 1 year ago.
Schmidt et al base their suggestions on group averages. Again, it was this very journal that published a study on the feasibility and reproducibility of single-subject assessment by fTCD.3 A full account of the present state of single-case fTCD analysis has already been published by Deppe et al.4
Schmidt et al state that “concordant differences between the female and the male subgroup could be visualized.”1 To us, this sentence is somewhat misleading. Changes in lateralization “concordant” in fMRI and fTCD have a 50% chance of occurring in each sex. The authors provide no statistical evidence for sex differences in their paper. Such differences cannot be established by finding significant (P=0.022) lateralization only in females and not in males, particularly as long as no correction for multiple comparisons (eg, Bonferroni) was performed. Even then, they found significant sex differences of cerebral blood flow velocity within neither the left nor the right middle cerebral arteries (figure 7).1
We agree with Schmidt et al that fTCD has a clinical potential. This is why the same rigid methodological requirements should be applied to fTCD as to other functional imaging techniques. The methodological tools for single-case studies are available.
Response
1Department of Neuroradiology, 2Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research–Central, Nervous System, 3Division of Neuropsychology of the Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the RWTH, Aachen, Germany
In accord with our colleagues Knecht and coworkers, we are glad that Stroke offers a platform for publishing and discussing the latest results of fTCD research.
Despite these promising research findings, fTCD still is not routinely used in the majority of hospitals. To promote this clinical application, we thought our confirmatory findings to be worth publishing. To our knowledge, our study was the first in which the potentials of fTCD and fMRI in identifying cognitive lateralization were compared directly. We could show for the group of subjects that with both methods one can detect a significant blood flow shift to the right hemisphere induced by a complex cognitive visuospatial task.
Our statement concerning the comparison of female and male subjects (“fTCD shows a higher VMCA increase of the rMCA in the male subgroup compared with the female subgroup, corresponding to the larger area of activation found in the fMRI results in the male subgroup”) was purely descriptive. It was meant to be an additional surprising yet possibly accidental finding that we thought to be worth mentioning. A 2-factorial repeated measures ANOVA with hemisphere (left, right) as repeated measures factor and gender as the second factor revealed no significant interaction between both factors (P=0.62), indicating that there was no significant gender difference in the degree of discrepancy between VMCA increases in both hemispheres. So our initial statement must either be considered accidental, or a much larger study would be required to detect a small interaction effect with sufficient statistical power. We have been aware of the work by Knecht and his colleaguesR1 R2 R3 quoted in their letter to Stroke, but because we did not utilize their method of evaluation we did not quote these papers.
With both fMRI as well as fTCD we could show the adequacy of both methods in detecting cognitive lateralization in a visuospatial task. In case of an absent temporal skull window, when fTCD fails to be useful for studying lateralization, fMRI might be a future alternative to the Wada test without any known side effects. Therefore, Knecht and coworkers must be credited for having pointed out that every new noninvasive technique must be studied closely for individual patient reproducibility of lateralization effects in cognitive paradigms.
References
R1.
Knecht S, Deppe M, Ringelstein EB, Wirtz M, Lohmann H, Drager B, Huber T, Henningsen H. Reproducibility of functional transcranial Doppler sonography in determining hemispheric language lateralization. Stroke.. 1998;29:1155–1159.
R2.
Knecht S, Deppe M, Ebner A, Henningsen H, Huber T, Jokeit H, Ringelstein EB. Noninvasive determination of language lateralization by functional transcranial Doppler sonography: a comparison with the Wada test. Stroke.. 1998;29:82–86.
R3.
Deppe M, Knecht S, Henningsen H, Ringelstein EB. AVERAGE: a Windows program for automated analysis of event related cerebral blood flow. J Neurosci Methods.. 1997;75:147–154.
References
1.
Schmidt P, Kings T, Willmes K, Roessler F, Reul J, Thron A. Determination of cognitive hemispheric lateralization by “functional” transcranial Doppler cross-validated by functional MRI. Stroke.. 1999;30:939–945.
2.
Knecht S, Deppe M, Ebner A, Henningsen H, Huber T, Jokeit H, Ringelstein E. Noninvasive determination of hemispheric language dominance using functional transcranial Doppler sonography: A comparison with the Wada test. Stroke.. 1998;29:82–86.
3.
Knecht S, Deppe M, Ringelstein E-B, Wirtz M, Lohmann H, Dräger B, Huber T, Henningsen H. Reproducibility of functional transcranial Doppler-sonography in determining hemispheric language lateralization. Stroke.. 1998;29:1155–1159.
4.
Deppe M, Knecht S, Henningsen H, Ringelstein E-B. AVERAGE: a Windows program for automated analysis of event related cerebral blood flow. J Neurosci Methods.. 1997;75:147–154.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by American Heart Association.
History
Published online: 1 November 1999
Published in print: November 1999
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Testing the Darwinian function of lateralization. Does separation of workload between brain hemispheres increase cognitive performance?, Neuropsychologia, 159, (107884), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107884
- Functional transcranial ultrasound, Manual of Neurosonology, (239-257), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447905.025
- Language lateralization of hearing native signers: A functional transcranial Doppler sonography (fTCD) study of speech and sign production, Brain and Language, 151, (23-34), (2015).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.10.006
- Using functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography to assess language lateralisation: Influence of task and difficulty level, Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 17, 6, (694-710), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2011.615128
- dopOSCCI: A functional transcranial Doppler ultrasonography summary suite for the assessment of cerebral lateralization of cognitive function, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 204, 2, (383-388), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.018
- Cerebral hemodynamic lateralization during memory tasks as assessed by functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) sonography: Effects of gender and healthy aging, Cortex, 47, 6, (750-758), (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.03.007
- Language lateralization in children using functional transcranial Doppler sonography, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52, 4, (331-336), (2010).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03362.x
- Variation in brain lateralization during various language tasks: A functional transcranial Doppler study, Behavioural Brain Research, 199, 2, (190-196), (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.040
- Language lateralization in young children assessed by functional transcranial Doppler sonography, NeuroImage, 24, 3, (780-790), (2005).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.053
- D-Amphetamine Boosts Language Learning Independent of its Cardiovascular and Motor Arousing Effects, Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 9, (1704-1714), (2004).https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300464
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.