Skip to main content
Review Article
Originally Published 2 November 2006
Free Access

Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability and Rupture

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

Abstract

Basic research over the last two decades has identified a large number of molecules pertinent to the atherosclerotic process, which have clearly improved our understanding of the underlying pathology. It is now well established that inflammation represents a major feature which is present in the vessel wall throughout all stages of the disease until the final pathophysiologic steps, representing plaque destabilization and eventually plaque rupture. Several cells typical for the atherosclerotic plaque, like monocyte-derived macrophages and T-lymphocytes are able to produce and secrete such mediator molecules, like cytokines, chemokines, growth-factors, enzymes, and disintegrins, which lead to activation of endothelial cells, proliferation of smooth muscle cells, lesion progression, and finally to the weakening of a vulnerable plaque by matrix degradation of its fibrous cap. Today, many of these molecules involved can be measured systemically by sensitive assays, and elevated concentrations in the circulation have been shown to be associated with future cardiovascular events. Determination of several of these molecules carries important prognostic information, independent of traditional risk factors, and may turn out to be useful in improving risk stratification. However, for most of these biomarkers the clinical utility has not yet been established.

Abstract

Basic research over the last two decades has identified a large number of biomarkers of atherosclerotic plaque destabilization and rupture, which carry important prognostic information and might be useful in improving risk stratification in the future. To date, however, none of them can be recommended for routine clinical use.
Atherosclerosis is characterized by a complex multifactorial pathophysiology. Inflammation in the vessel wall is now considered to play an essential role in the initiation, progression and the final steps of atherosclerosis, namely plaque destabilization and eventually plaque rupture. Classical pathologic studies show the abundant presence of inflammatory cells, like monocyte-derived macrophages and T-lymphocytes at the site of rupture or superficial erosion preferable in the shoulder area of the plaque cap. These morphological characteristics are preceded by dysfunction of activated endothelial cells which produce adhesion molecules that interact with inflammatory cells. The ability of monocyte-derived macrophages to secrete various cytokines, chemokines, growth-factors, and disintegrins, then leads to activation and proliferation of smooth muscle cells, lesion progression, and finally to the weakening of a vulnerable plaque by matrix degradation of its fibrous cap1 (Figure). Yet atherosclerosis and its clinical complications are not only characterized by a local inflammatory response. Recent prospective studies have consistently shown that several molecular proinflammatory biomarkers, markers of plaque destabilization and plaque rupture may be used to predict future cardiovascular (CV) events not only in apparently healthy subjects, but also in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).2 In particular, measurements of several of these markers carry important prognostic information, independent of traditional risk factors. This review aims at giving an overview on recent biomarker candidates that are related to destabilization and rupture of the atherosclerotic plaque.
Markers of inflammation and plaque instability: from foam cell to plaque rupture (modified after reference 2) *Biomarkers, which are covered in this review. IL indicates interleukin, TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; sICAM, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1; sVCAM, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule; oxLDL, oxidized low density lipoprotein; Lp-PLA2, lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2; GPx-1, glutathione peroxidase; MPO, myeloperoxidase; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; PlGF, placental growth factor; PAPP-A, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A; sCD40L, soluble CD40 ligand; CRP, C-reactive protein; sPLA2, secretory type II phospholipase A2; SAA, serum amyloid A; WBCC, white blood cell count.

C-Reactive Protein

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a member of the pentraxin family and represents the most extensively studied proinflammatory molecule. In healthy individuals, only trace levels of CRP can be detected in the circulation. Under acute conditions, concentrations of CRP increase during the first 6 to 8 hours and can reach peak levels approaching 300 mg/L after approximately 48 hours.3 CRP is a robust clinical marker because of its analytical stability, shows reproducible results, and high-sensitivity assays with good precision are commercially available.
CRP is synthesized by hepatocytes and its production is under transcriptional control of several cytokines, with interleukin (IL)-6 being a primary stimulus. However, recent evidence has suggested that CRP may be also produced locally in vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and macrophages of atherosclerotic lesions.4–5 A recent post-mortem study further confirmed a potential pathogenic role of CRP in atheromatous plaque vulnerability,6 demonstrating that higher CRP concentrations strongly correlated with increased numbers of thin cap fibroatheromas.
CRP has initially been considered as an innocent bystander in the atherosclerotic process. Recent evidence, however, suggests that CRP may have direct proinflammatory effects, and contribute to the initiation, and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. Functionally, CRP has several effects that may influence progression of vascular disease, including activation and chemoattraction of circulating monocytes, mediation of endothelial dysfunction, induction of a prothrombotic state, increase of cytokine release, activation of the complement system, facilitation of extracellular matrix remodeling as well as lipid-related effects.7 However, several of the above mentioned potential proatherogenic properties of CRP should be interpreted with caution, because very recent findings indicated that several direct effects of CRP on the vasculature, observed in in vitro studies, might represent artifacts.8 Animal models, including transgenic mice, have also provided conflicting evidence regarding proatherogenic effects of CRP.7
In contrast to the controversial results from in vitro and in vivo studies supporting a causal role for CRP in atherogenesis, epidemiological studies published during the past decade have provided strong evidence for CRP to predict future CV risk in a wide variety of clinical settings, including apparently healthy men and women, patients with stable angina pectoris (AP), or those with ACS, after myocardial infarction (MI), and with the metabolic syndrome.
So far, results from more than 25 different prospective studies have been reported, and the vast majority of these studies clearly demonstrated a significant and independent association between increased concentrations of CRP and future CV events (Table 1). An earlier meta-analysis summarizing the results of 14 prospective long-term studies with a total of 2557 cases and a mean follow up (FU) period of 8 years9 revealed a summary relative risk (RR) for CHD of 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 2.3) for the top versus the bottom tertile (T) of the CRP distribution. More recently, however, the results from the Reykjavik study, raised some uncertainties regarding the predictive power of CRP by showing a more modest increased risk associated with elevated CRP concentrations with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.25 to 1.68) for T3 versus T1 after multivariate adjustment.10 A subsequent meta-analysis of 22 population–based studies, including a total of 7068 patients with incident coronary events, showed a similar result.10 However, there are some issues concerning this study, which merit consideration. The Reykjavik study represents a prospective cohort of 18 569 participants, where CRP was measured in approximately 6500 middle-aged men and women without a history of MI at baseline, who were followed for 17.5 years. As compared with previously published studies, the Reykjavik participants had the highest cholesterol levels seen in any cohort or clinical trial, even higher than in the 4 S study,11 and lower CRP (upper tertile cut-off point of 2.0 mg/L, rather that 3.0 mg/L) as seen in almost all other studies. Thus, underestimation of the true risk associated with elevated CRP is very likely. In addition, the mean FU period of 17 years is extremely long and might also be responsible for the weakening of the association between the risk marker and the disease outcome. A phenomenon that is well known from classical risk factors. Indeed, if we look at the risk estimate at 10 years (“normal” FU time in most prospective studies) the risk estimate was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.49 to 2.28), that is similar to those from other studies, thereby reinforcing the status of CRP as a strong and independent predictor of future CV risk. In ROC analyses, CRP did not show an incremental predictive value once total cholesterol was in the model, but other classical risk factors, like smoking and hypertension did not either. More recently, the large EPIC-Norfolk study from the UK conducted between 1993 and 2003 found that CRP was among the strongest variables predicting risk of coronary heart disease (CHD); and it was the strongest if only fatal cases were analyzed12; and in contrast to the Reykjavik study, the authors found that other risk factors had no incremental value. Additional data in support of a clinical utility of CRP as a predictor variable came from the MONICA Augsburg cohort studies13 and the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), an elderly population without a history of vascular disease at baseline.14 Thus, to date, of all biomarkers investigated in CV disease, the most extensive and robust database exists for CRP. Still, its incremental predictive value above and beyond traditional risk factors, based on any of the available scores has not been definitely proven. Eventually, this issue might be solved on the basis of individual subject data in a meta-analysis currently prepared by the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration Group. Until then widespread screening for CRP in unselected populations cannot be recommended.
TABLE 1. C-Reactive Protein and Cardiovascular Disease: Overview of Prospective Studies
AuthorStudyDesignPopulationOutcome VariableFUNo.Risk Estimate (RR/OR, 95% CI)*Reference
*Multivariable adjustment;
†Partially adjusted;
‡Increase per 1 Unit or standard deviation (SD);
∥≥ vs<median;
¶Tertile analysis (T3 vs T1);
#Quartile analysis (Q4 vs Q1);
**Quintile analysis (Q5 vs Q1);
§For CRP >3 mg/L vs CRP <1 mg/L
FU indicates Follow-up; CI, Confidence Interval; RR, Relative Risk; OR, Odds Ratio; CHD, Coronary Heart Disease; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; SCD, Sudden Cardiac Death; M, Male; F, Female; MRFIT, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial; PHS, Physicians’ Health Study; CHS, Cardiovascular Health Study; RHPP, Rural Health Promotion Project; WHS, Women’s Health Study; MONICA, Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease; Iowa 65+ RHS, Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study; BRHS, British Regional Heart Study; WOSCOPS, West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative; PRIME, Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction; ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; KIHD, Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study; FHS, Framingham Heart Study; KORA, Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg.
Kuller et alMRFITnested case-controlHealthy menCHD10246/4911.54 (0.96–2.50)#Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:537–547
Ridker et alPHSnested case-controlHealthy menCHD/Stroke8543/543CHD: 2.9 (1.8–4.6)#; Stroke: 1.9 (1.1–3.3)#N Engl J Med. 1997; 336:973–979
Tracy et alCHSnested case-controlElderly (65+)CHD2.4146/1462.67 (1.04–6.81)#Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17:1121–1127
Tracy et alRHPPnested case-controlElderly (65+)CHD3145/146M: 2.0 (0.82–4.87)** F: 2.7 (1.1–6.69)**Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17:1121–1127
Ridker et alWHSnested case-controlHealthy womenCVD3122/2444.1 (1.7–9.9)#Circulation. 1998; 98:731–733
Agewall et alGöteborgcomplete cohortHypertensive menCHD31311.16 (1.06–1.29) (per 1 unit)J Hypertens. 1998;16:537–541
Koenig et alMONICA Augsburgcomplete cohortHealthy menCHD8.29361.50 (1.14–1.97) (per 1 SD)Circulation. 1999; 99:237–242
Harris et alIowa 65+ RHScase-cohortElderly (65+)CV Mortality4.6176/4991.8 (0.9–3.6)#Am J Med. 1999;106:506–512
Jager et alHoorncomplete cohortNondiab/diab M/FCV Mortality56311.93 (0.81–4.63)Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19:3071–3078
Gram et alGlostrupnested case-controlHealthy M/FCHD12133/258RR not assessed; P=0.3346J Intern Med. 2000;247:205–212
Roivanen et alHelsinki Heartnested case-controlDyslipidemic menCHD8.5241/2413.56 (1.93–6.57)#Circulation. 2000; 101:252–257
Danesh et alBRHSnested case-controlHealthy menCHD9.5329/8202.31 (1.42–3.76)Brit Med J. 2000; 321:199–204
Packard et alWOSCOPSnested case-controlDyslipidemic menCVD4.9580/11601.13 (0.98–1.29) (per 1 SD)N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1148–1155
Strandberg et alHelsinki Agingcomplete cohortElderly (75+)CV Mortality104551.22 (1.10–1.35) (per 10 mg/L)Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1057–1060
Mendall et alCaerphillycomplete cohortHealthy menCHD513952.01 (1.14–3.56)**Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1584–1590
Rost et alFraminghamcomplete cohortHealthy M/FStroke12–141462M: 1.6 (0.87–3.13)#; F: 2.1 (1.19–3.83)#Stroke. 2001; 32:2575–2579
Pirro et alQuebec CVcomplete cohortHealthy menCHD5203711.1 (0.7–1.6)²Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2474–2480
Lowe et alSpeedwellcomplete cohortHealthy menCHD6.320551.60 (0.90–2.83)**Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:603–610
Albert et alPHSnested case-controlHealthy menSCD1797/1922.65 (0.79–8.83)#Circulation. 2002; 105:2595–2599
Pradhan et alWHInested case-controlHealthy womenCHD2.9304/3042.1 (1.1–4.1)#J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288:980–987
Ridker et alWHScomplete cohortHealthy womenCVD8279392.3 (1.6–3.4)**N Engl J Med. 2002;347: 1557–1565
Luc et alPRIMEnested case-controlHealth menCHD5317/6092.16 (1.26–3.72)Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1255–1261
Van der Meer et alRotterdamnested case-controlElderly (55+)CHD5157/5001.2 (0.6–2.2)#Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1323–1328
Danesh et alReykjaviknested case-controlHealthy M/FCHD17.52459/39691.45 (1.25–1.68)N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1387–1397
Koenig et alMONICA Augsburgcomplete cohortHealthy menCHD6.634352.21 (1.49–3.27)§Circulation. 2004;109:1349–1353
Ballantyne et alARICnested case-cohortHealthy M/FCHD6–8608/7401.72 (1.24–2.39)§Circulation. 2004;109:837–842
Pai et alNHSnested case-controlHealthy M/FCHD8239/469F: 1.53 (0.89–2.62)§New Engl J Med. 2004;351:2599–2610
 HPFU   6265/529M: 1.79 (1.14–2.83)§ 
Cushman et alCHScomplete cohortElderly (65+)CHD1039711.37 (1.06–1.78)§Circulation. 2005;112:25–31
Laaksonen et alKIHDcomplete cohortHealthy menCV Mortality14.614782.94 (1.46–5.91)§Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:1783–1789
Wilson et alFHScomplete cohortHealthy M/FCVD844461.16 (0.92–1.47)§Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2473–2478
Boekholdt et alEPIC-Norfolknested case-controlHealthy M/FCHD61108/21641.66 (1.31–2.12)#Atherosclerosis. 2006;187:415–422
Koenig et alMONICA/KORAcase-cohortHealthy M/FCHD11382/1980M: 1.89 (1.28–2.77) F: 1.35 (0.64–2.84)Arterioscler Thromb Vac Biol. In press.

Cytokines

IL-6

IL-6 is a 26-kDa single chain glycoprotein, produced by many cell types including activated monocytes/macrophages and endothelial cells, as well as by adipose tissue.15 IL-6 is able to stimulate macrophages to secrete MCP-1 and participates in the proliferation of SMCs.15 In addition, ECs stimulated by IL-6, express intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1).15 In a murine model of atherosclerosis, injection of excessive amounts of recombinant IL-6 resulted in enhanced fatty lesion development.16 Furthermore, IL-6 represents the principal procoagulant cytokine,17 but its most important function is the amplification of the inflammatory cascade15 through which IL-6 at least in part might exerts its direct proatherogenic effects in the arterial wall. Indeed, large amounts of IL-6 have been found in human atherosclerotic plaque,18–19 in particular within the shoulder region of stable and unstable plaque, where it colocalized with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT-1) receptor.20 Upregulation of the AT-1 receptor by IL-6 has led to increased angiotensin II–mediated vasoconstriction, enhanced free oxygen radical production and the development of endothelial dysfunction.21 In addition, Maier et al have recently demonstrated in patients with ACS that IL-6 levels were markedly higher at the site of coronary plaque rupture than in the systemic circulation.22
Various clinical and epidemiological studies have investigated the predictive value of IL-6 plasma concentrations for future CV events. In patients with unstable angina, elevated levels of IL-6 48 hours after admission, were associated with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality.23 More importantly, the Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease II (FRISC II)24 study not only confirmed the predictive power of IL-6, but also demonstrated that patients with high IL-6 level might benefit most from an early invasive strategy. In addition, several prospective studies have consistently shown that baseline levels of IL-6 are a potent predictor of future CV end points in apparently healthy asymptomatic subjects from the general population25–28 (Table 2).
TABLE 2. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Cardiovascular Disease: Overview of Prospective Studies
AuthorStudyDesignPopulationOutcome VariableFUNo.Risk Estimate (RR/OR, 95% CI)*Reference
*Multivariable adjustment;
†Matched for age and smoking;
‡Increase per 1 standard deviation (SD);
∥Tertile analysis (T3 vs T1);
¶Quartile analysis (Q4 vs Q1);
#Quintile analysis (Q5 vs Q1);
FU indicates Follow-up; CI, Confidence Interval; RR, Relative Risk; OR, Odds Ratio; CHD, Coronary Heart Disease; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; M, Male; F, Female Iowa 65+; RHS, Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study; PHS, Physicians’ Health Study; WHS, Women’s Health Study; WHAS, Women’s Health and Aging Study; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative; Health ABC, Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study; PRIME, Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction; WOSCOPS, West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study; MONICA, Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease/KORA, Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg
Harris et alIowa 65+RHScase-cohortElderly (65+)CV Mortality4.6176/4992.2 (1.0–4.8)Am J Med. 1999; 106:506–512
Ridker et alPHSnested case-controlHealthy menCHD6202/2022.3 (1.1–4.6)Circulation. 2000; 101:1767–1772
Ridker et alWHSnested case-controlHealthy womenCVD3122/2442.2 (1.1–4.3)N Engl J Med. 2000; 342:836–843
Volpato et alWHAScomplete cohortElderly (65+)CV Mortality36202.52 (1.21–4.55)Circulation. 2001;103:947–953
Pradhan et alWHInested case-controlHealthy womenCHD2.9304/3042.1 (1.1–4.0)J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288:980–987
Cesari et alHealth ABCcomplete cohortElderly (70+)CHD/Stroke3.62225CHD: 1.27 (1.10–1.48) Stroke: 1.45 (1.12–1.86)Circulation. 2003;108:2317–2322
Luc et alPRIMEnested case-controlHealth menCHD5317/6092.16 (1.26–3.72)Arterioscler Thromb Vac Biol. 2003;23:1255–1261
Lowe et alWOSCOPSnested case-controlDyslipidemic menCHD5485/9341.64 (1.11–2.40)#Arterioscler Thromb Vac Biol. 2004; 24:1529–1534
Koenig et alMONICA/KORAcase-cohortHealthy M/FCHD11382/1980M: 1.42 (0.97–2.07)Arterioscler Thromb Vac Biol. In press.
       F: 2.99 (1.38–6.49) 
Thus, IL-6 induces a prothrombotic state and has important direct proatherogenic properties in addition to its role in the amplification of the inflammatory cascade by initiating an acute phase response. Yet, it is does not seem suitable for inclusion in the clinical routine, among others because of analytical concerns.

IL-18

IL-18, a pleiotropic proinflammatory cytokine, is widely expressed in various cell types.29 Beyond induction of interferon (IFN)-γ30 with subsequent promotion of Th1 immune response, IL-18 enhances the expression of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs)31–33 and these two abilities of IL-18 characterize it as a crucial and potent mediator of atherosclerotic plaque destabilization and vulnerability. Increased expression of IL-18 in human atherosclerotic plaque has been shown, especially in lesions prone to rupture, where it is localized mainly in plaque macrophages.31,34 In animal models, inhibition of IL-18 by IL-18 binding protein reduced atherosclerotic plaque development and progression in apoE-deficient mice35 and IL-18/apo-E double knockout mice exhibited reduced lesion size,36 thus further supporting a proatherogenic role of IL-18. In contrast, direct administration of IL-18 enhanced atherogenesis in an IFN-γ–dependent manner,37 even in the absence of T-cells38 and induced/promoted a switch to a vulnerable plaque phenotype by decreasing intimal collagen content and cap-to-core ratio.39
Whereas experimental studies on the role of IL-18 in atherogenesis are relatively consistent and promising, the clinical evidence for this biomarker in cross-sectional studies in patients with CHD is controversial.40–42 Furthermore, results from one large prospective study, conducted in 1229 patients with angiographically confirmed CHD showed that increased IL-18 levels at baseline were independently associated with future CV death during a 3.9-year FU,43 but at 5.9 years, IL-18 concentrations were no longer predictive of outcome,44 thereby questioning its value as a risk marker.
Todate, only two studies assessed the prognostic value of elevated IL-18 for future coronary events in apparently healthy subjects.45–46 In the Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME) Study,45 a cohort from France and Northern Ireland, elevated IL-18 concentrations at baseline were associated with an increased risk for subsequent CHD events after multivariable adjustment. However, such an association was only seen when data from both populations were pooled for analysis. In a large case-cohort study in initially healthy middle-aged men and women from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg populations with a mean FU of 11 years,46 concentrations of IL-18 were measured in 382 case subjects with incident CHD and in 1980 non-case subjects. In multivariable analyses there was no statistically significant association, neither in men nor in women. This large population-based case-cohort study therefore suggests that IL-18 might only serve as a marker of future CV events in men with manifest CHD and/or in areas of high absolute risk of CHD and thus, further studies are needed to evaluate its true clinical value.

Oxidized LDL

The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherogenesis suggests that the most significant event in early lesion formation is lipid oxidation, placing oxidized LDL (oxLDL) in a central role for the development of this disease. OxLDL has a large number of biological actions and consequences, including injuring ECs, expressing adhesion molecules, recruiting leukocytes and retaining them, as well as the formation of foam cells.47 Furthermore, elevated oxLDL could play a role in the transition from stable to vulnerable, unstable plaque, and this assumption is supported by recent studies showing that oxLDL stimulates matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and -9 expressions in human vascular EC and in monocyte-derived macrophages.48–49 It has also been shown that oxLDL upregulates the expression of MMP-1 and -3 in human coronary ECs, an effect mediated through its endothelial receptor LOX-1.50 Furthermore, oxLDL triggers the CD40/CD40L signaling pathway, which might also lead to a proinflammatory reaction and induce endothelial injury.51
Several cross-sectional studies have examined the involvement of oxidative modification of LDL in subjects with clinical evidence of CHD and demonstrated that oxLDL concentrations were significantly higher in patients with MI than in patients with unstable or stable angina or age-matched controls.52–54 Salonen et al55 were the first to conduct a prospective, population-based, nested case–control study in which the titer of autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-modified LDL and native LDL was associated with accelerated progression of carotid atherosclerosis. More recently, data of a first prospective nested case–control study from two population-based MONICA/KORA Augsburg surveys56 showed that plasma oxLDL was the strongest predictor of CHD events compared with a conventional lipoprotein profile, and other traditional risk factors for CHD. Further studies are warranted to establish the clinical relevance of oxLDL measurement in various stages of the atherosclerotic process and identify the specific pathophysiological mechanisms by which oxLDL exerts it deleterious effects.

Glutathion Peroxidase

Although results of several large antioxidant trials were disappointing,57 nonetheless, on the basis of experimental and epidemiological studies, it seems justified to assume that oxLDL may indeed play a key role in the generation of inflammatory processes in atherosclerotic lesions and that antioxidative mechanisms still may be important in the pathophysiology of the disease.
Glutathion peroxidase (GPx) is a selenium-containing enzyme with potent antioxidant properties,58 which uses glutathione to reduce hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxides to water and lipid alcohols, respectively.59 To date, 4 isoforms of GPx have been identified, with GPx-1, as an intracellular molecule, being more intensively studied. Experimental studies in GPx-1 knockout mice have demonstrated an increased oxidation of LDL60 or have developed endothelial dysfunction attributable to deficiency in bioactive nitric oxide61 as compared with wild-type mice. This enzyme might also inhibit transcription of 5-lipoxygenase as well as leukotriene and prostanoid synthesis in mononuclear cells and macrophages, EC, platelets and leukocytes.62 In one prospective study,63 risk of future fatal and non-fatal CV events associated with baseline activity of erythrocyte GPx-1 and superoxide dismutase activity was investigated in 636 patients with angiographically confirmed CHD and was found to be inversely associated with increasing GPx-1 activity. Clearly, such data need replication in further studies, before any sound conclusions can be drawn on its potential value as an additional risk marker.

Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase (Lp-PLA2) represents another emerging biomarker for atherosclerotic disease and is presently under intensive investigation. Lp-PLA2, a 45.4-kDa protein, is a calcium-independent member of the phospholipase A2 family. It is produced mainly by monocytes, macrophages, T-lymphocytes, and mast cells and has been found to be upregulated in atherosclerotic lesions, especially in complex plaque, as well as in thin cap coronary lesions prone to rupture.64 In the bloodstream, two-thirds of the Lp-PLA2 plasma isoform circulates primarily bound to low-density lipoproteins (LDL), the other third is distributed between HDL and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL).64,65
Lp-PLA2 may promote oxidation of LDL, and recent investigations have stressed the proatherogenic properties of this enzyme.66 LDL provides a circulating reservoir, in which Lp-PLA2 remains inactive until LDL undergoes oxidative modification. After LDL oxidation within the arterial wall, a short acyl group at the sn-2 position of phospholipids becomes susceptible to the hydrolytic action of Lp-PLA2 that cleaves an oxidized phosphatidylcholine component of the lipoprotein particle generating two potent proinflammatory and proatherogenic mediators, namely lysophosphatidyl-choline (LysoPC) and oxidized fatty acid (oxFA).66 LysoPC is a potent chemoattractant for T-cells and monocytes, promotes endothelial cell dysfunction, stimulates macrophage proliferation, and induces apoptosis in SMCs and macrophages.64 Thus, Lp-PLA2 may represent an important “missing link” between the oxidative modification of LDL in the intimal layer of the arterial wall and local inflammatory processes within the atherosclerotic plaque.
Several studies in initially healthy subjects but also in those with manifest atherosclerosis have found an association between increased concentrations of Lp-PLA2 and future coronary and cerebrovascular events, independent of a variety of potential confounders67–76 (Table 3). However, measurement of Lp-PLA2 in the early phase of the ACS was not associated with increased risk for recurrent events.71–73 Apart from an important role of Lp-PLA2 in the prediction of future CV disease, this enzyme could also represent an attractive novel therapeutic target, because initial studies have demonstrated a significant clinical benefit by inhibiting this enzyme through azetidinones, a new class of compounds acting as acylating inhibitors of the enzymatic activity of Lp-PLA2 or by pyromidones.64 However, no clear recommendation on its clinical usefulness can be given until further data document its incremental value in addition to traditional risk factors.
TABLE 3. Lp-PLA2 and Cardiovascular Disease: Overview of Prospective Studies
AuthorStudyDesignPopulationOutcome VariableFUNo.Risk Estimate (RR/OR, 95% CI)*Reference
*Multivariable adjustment;
†Measurement of Lp-PLA2 mass;
‡Measurement of Lp-PLA2 activity;
∥Increase per 1 standard deviation (SD);
¶Tertile analysis, (T3 vs T1);
#Quartile analysis, (Q4 vs Q1);
FU indicates Follow-up; CI, Confidence Interval; RR, Relative Risk; OR, Odds Ratio; CHD, Coronary Heart Disease; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; M, Male; F, Female; WOSCOPS, West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study; WHS, Women’s Health Study; ARIC, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; MONICA, Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease; KAROLA, Langzeiterfolge der kardiologischen Anschlußheilbehandlung; IHCS, Intermountain Heart Collaborative Study; NOMAS, Northern Manhattan Study.
Packard et alWOSCOPSnested case-controlDyslipidemic menCHD4.9580/11601.18 (1.05–1.33)N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1148–1155
Blake et alWHSnested case-controlHealthy womenCHD3123/1231.17 (0.45–3.05)#J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:13021306
Ballantyne et alARICnested case-cohortHealthy M/FCHD6–8608/7401.15 (0.81–1.63)Circulation. 2004;109:837–842
       LDL-C <130 mg/dL 2.08 (1.20–3.62) 
Koenig et alMONICAcomplete cohortHealthy menCHD149341.21 (1.01–1.45)Circulation. 2004;110:1903–1908
Oei et alRotterdamnested case-cohortElderly (55+)CHD10377/18221.76 (1.09–2.85)#Circulation. 2005;111:570–575
Persson et alMalmöcomplete cohortHealthy M/FCVD9.4145/49381.69 (1.10–2.60)Circulation. 2005;112:II-802
Brilakis et alMayocomplete cohortCHD patientsCVD45041.30 (1.06–1.59)Eur Heart J. 2005;26:137–144
Horne et alIHCScomplete cohortCHD patientsCHD death6.714931.73 (0.84–3.61)#Am Heart J.. 2006;152:997–1003.
Oei et alRotterdamnested case-cohortElderly (55+)Stroke12200/18221.77 (1.19–2.64)#Circulation. 2005;111:570–575
Ballantyne et alARICnested case-cohortHealthy M/FStroke4.4194/7661.93 (1.14–3.27)Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2479–2484
Persson et alMalmöcomplete cohortHealthy M/FStroke9.4112/49381.69 (0.90–3.18)Circulation. 2005;112(Abs.Supp):II-802
Koenig et alKAROLAcomplete cohortCHD patientsCVD41,0512.09 (1.10–3.96); 1.81 (0.94–3.49)Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1586–1593
Elkind et alNOMAScomplete cohortStroke patientsStroke4.04672.08 (1.09–4.18)#Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166:2073–2080

Type II Secretory Phospholipase A2

Type II secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2-II) is another well studied member of the phospholipase 2 family and is widely expressed in hepatocytes, macrophages, EDs, platelets and vascular SMCs.77 SPLA2 type II is a Ca2+-dependent, 14-kDa enzyme which belongs to the group of acute phase reactants. SPLA2-II production is upregulated in response to proinflammatory compounds such as IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, INF-γ, and oxLDL.77,78
Possible atherogenic mechanisms of sPLA2-II include its effects on lipoproteins which results in the release of various lipid mediators at the site of lipoprotein retention in the arterial wall, that in turn may trigger local inflammatory cellular responses. Furthermore, in arterial tissue, sPLA2-II may also directly modify LDL particles to become more atherogenic and may increase the affinity of ApoB-100 on LDL to glycosaminglycans and proteoglycans.77,79 sPLA2-II is also implicated in the production of isoprostanes which exhibit strong mitogenic activity and induce platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction. In vivo studies of transgenic mice overexpressing human sPLA2-II showed an enhanced formation of bioactive oxidized phospholipids, as well as an increased formation of atherosclerotic lesions.77,80
Furthermore, circulating sPLA2-II in blood has been demonstrated to predict coronary events in initially healthy subjects and in patients with manifest CHD including ACS. In the EPIC Norfolk study comprising 3314 subjects, elevated levels of sPLA2 were associated with an increased risk of future CHD events in multivariable analyses.81 Elevated levels of sPLA2-II were significant and independent predictors of future cardiovascular events in CHD patients,82 in patients with unstable angina,83 and in patients with severe ACS.84 Although consistent, all of the above studies in CHD patients were relatively small and results in healthy subjects have to be replicated in other cohorts until the clinical usefulness of sPLA2-II in the prediction of CHD may be established.

Myeloperoxidase

Myeloperoxidase (MPO), a member of the heme peroxidase superfamily, is a leukocyte-derived enzyme, and is secreted on leukocyte activation and degranulation.85 There are several pathways through which MPO could exert its deleterious effects. MPO together with other enzymes such as lipoxygenase and sPL might initiate lipid oxidation in the subendothelial space of the vessel wall. MPO and its oxidation products have been found to be markedly enriched in human atherosclerotic lesions, compared with control vessels, where they colocalize with macrophages.85 MPO could be also involved in the development of endothelial dysfunction, because MPO uses the atheroprotective endothelial-derived NO as a substrate.86 Nonetheless, a most pivotal characteristic of MPO and its end product HOCl remains its ability to activate MMPs87 and deactivate inhibitors of MMPs,88 which promote the weakening of the fibrous cap and lead to the destabilized atherosclerotic plaque.
In line with these findings are the results of two prospective studies in patients with ACS. MPO mass concentrations have been measured in the c7E3 Anti-Platelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory angina (CAPTURE) trial in 1090 patients with ACS. Baseline MPO levels predicted an increased risk for adverse CV events, and this effect was even more pronounced in patients without myocardial necrosis (negative for cardiac troponin at baseline).89 In a large cohort of patients with chest pain, a single measurement of MPO on admission independently predicted acute MI.90 Thus, MPO might be a promising prognostic marker for CV events, especially in the ACS. However, further studies are needed to replicate these findings and to establish a potential role for MPO as a predictor of incident CHD in initially healthy subjects.

Matrix Metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) belong to a family of multidomain zinc-dependent endopeptidases that promote degradation of all protein and proteoglycan-core-protein components of the extracellular matrix (ECM).91 Based on domain organization and substrate specificities, MMPs are grouped into collagenases (MMP1, 8, 13), gelatinases (MMP2 and MMP9), stromelysins (MMP3, 10, and 11), matrilysins (MMP7), metalloelastases (MMP12), and membrane-type (MT)-MMPs.91 MMPs are widely expressed in monocytes/macrophages, ECs and SMCs, fibroblasts, and neoplastic cells.92 MMPs are involved in the embryonic development and morphogenesis, wound healing and tissue resorption. On the other hand, MMPs might be implicated in vascular and cardiac remodeling as a result of dysregulated activation of these enzymes.91 Recently, several lines of evidences have demonstrated that MMPs play an important role in atherogenesis.92 Most importantly, MMPs are highly expressed in macrophage-rich areas of the atherosclerotic plaque, especially at the shoulder region of the cap,93 which might promote weakening of the fibrous cap and subsequent destabilization of atherosclerotic lesions.
Several cross-sectional studies have demonstrated significantly increased concentrations of MMPs in patients with ACS compared with healthy controls or in patients with more advanced CHD.94–96 However, to date only one prospective study conducted in 1227 patients with angiographically confirmed CHD, showed that increased concentrations of MMP-9 at baseline were associated with future CV death.97 Interestingly, high concentrations of the endogenous tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP) were also predictive for future CV death in this study,98 which has been confirmed by others.99 Thus, undoubtedly, MMPs play an important role in plaque destabilization, but further studies are needed to prove or disprove their clinical usefulness for risk assessment.

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) (CCL2) is the most important chemokine that regulates migration and infiltration of monocytes/macrophages. Its effects are mainly mediated through CC chemokine receptors 2 (CCR2). ECs, monocytes, and/or SMCs express MCP-1 in response to various cytokines, growth factors, oxLDL, and CD40L100 and thus MCP-1 expression is increased in atherosclerotic lesions,101 in particular in macrophage-rich areas. MCP-1 causes chronic vascular inflammation, induces proliferation and migration of SMCs, migration of ECs, neovascularization in plaque, oxidative stress, and thrombosis.102 Activation of the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway has also been shown to induce expression of MMPs,103 thus suggesting its involvement in plaque destabilization.
In animal models, the expression of MCP-1 was directly related to the extent of atherosclerosis and macrophage infiltration into the atherosclerotic lesion,104 and anti-monocyte MCP-1 gene therapy limited the progression and destabilization of established atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice.105 Based on these findings, MCP-1 could present an interesting, novel target for intervention to reduce atherosclerotic complications.
Consistent with such experimental data, in the Orbofiban in Patients with Unstable coronary Syndromes (OPUS)-TIMI 16 trial, elevated levels of MCP-1 were associated with risk of death or MI after 10 months, independent of a variety of CV risk factors, clinical and ECG characteristics, renal function, and markers of necrosis and inflammation.106 However, although in a large case-cohort study from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg database, elevated levels of MCP-1 preceded CHD events, they were not independent predictors of risk, once traditional risk factors were also considered.107 Thus, further studies in various populations are needed to potentially establish MCP-1 as a clinically useful biomarker.

Placental Growth Factor

Placental growth factor (PlGF) represents another important candidate biomarker of plaque instability. PlGF, a member of the cysteine-knot family of growth factors, is a ≈50-kDa angiogenic protein, demonstrating an ≈40% amino acid sequence similarity to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).108 PlGF was initially discovered in the placenta, which represents a primary source of its synthesis; further it is expressed in the heart, lungs, goiter, and thyroid tissue108 and was found to be upregulated within early and advanced atherosclerotic lesions.109 Besides its physiological functions during pregnancy, PlGF also possesses potent proatherogenic properties such as proliferation and migration of ECs and SMCs, chemotactic recruitment of circulating monocytes and macrophages into atherosclerotic lesions, and upregulation of several cytokines such as, eg, TNF-α.109,110 Moreover, PlGF might form a heterodimer with VEGF, thereby enhancing several deleterious effects of this growth factor.108 Experimental studies using apoE- and PlGF-deficient mice have confirmed a proatherogenic effect of PlGF, demonstrating a reduction of early atherosclerotic plaque development with decreased macrophage content.111 Furthermore, periadventitial PlGF adenoviral gene delivery to carotid arteries in hypercholesterolemic rabbits led to increased intimal thickening, neointimal macrophage accumulation, and adventitial neovascularization.111
Only two clinical studies have investigated the potential role of PlGF as a predictor of adverse outcome in the ACS.112,113 Circulating PlGF concentrations were measured in 547 patients of the placebo arm of the CAPTURE trial, as well as in 626 patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Indeed, in these two populations, elevated concentrations of PlGF were significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse events (death or nonfatal MI) at 30 days, and this association was independent of several other biomarkers such as troponin, sCD40L, and CRP.112 Moreover, when the follow-up period in the CAPTURE study was extended from 1 to 48 months, increased PlGF concentrations remained a potent and independent predictor of the incidence of death or MI.113 Yet, the present database is still too limited for a recommendation regarding its clinical usefulness as a risk marker.

Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A

Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) is a high-molecular mass, zinc binding metalloproteinase which may be produced by different activated cells in unstable plaques and released into the extracellular matrix. Using specific monoclonal antibodies, PAPP-A was found to be abundantly expressed in both eroded and ruptured coronary and carotid plaques, mainly in monocyte/macrophages present in the cap and shoulder region,114,115 but was only minimally expressed in stable plaque. PAPP-A is a specific activator of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and acts by degrading IGF binding proteins-4 and -5, thus allowing active IGF-1 to bind to cell-surface type 1 IGF receptors.116 IGF-1 induces cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, inflammatory cell activation, LDL-cholesterol uptake, and release of inflammatory cytokines, thus contributing to plaque progression and destabilization. Whether PAPP-A directly can degrade extracellular matrix remains unclear.114
Several studies in patients with ACS, but also with stable CHD, have investigated PAPP-A as a potential marker of risk for clinical complications. In a small study,114 circulating PAPP-A levels were significantly higher in patients with unstable angina and MI compared with controls. In a larger cohort of 200 patients with troponin negative ACS, PAPP-A levels independently predicted ischemic cardiac events and need for revascularization during 6-month FU.117 Within the CAPTURE trial, PAPP-A levels indicated increased risk of death and MI in both troponin negative and troponin positive patients. In multivariable analysis, PAPP-A, sCD40L, IL-10, and VEGF were independent predictors of outcome.118 Similarly, in patients with STEMI, PAPP-A levels were increased and predicted 12-month risk of death and recurrent non-fatal MI.119 In addition, PAPP-A and its endogenous inhibitor, the proform of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP), were related to complex angiographic stenosis morphology in patients with stable CHD,120 and PAPP-A was prospectively associated with future death and ACS in such patients.121 Thus, in several studies increased circulating PAPP-A levels have been shown as a mediator of adverse inflammatory events, but it has also been suggested that PAPP-A may be a suppressor rather than a mediator of inflammation and tissue damage.122 Also, there is recent evidence for the presence of an ACS-related isoform of PAPP-A, which is not complexed with the proMBP, that should result in the development of more specific assays.123 Thus, further mechanistic and clinical studies are needed to assess the potential utility of PAPP-A for risk stratification in the ACS.

Soluble CD40 Ligand

CD40 and CD40L (CD 154), both members of the TNF superfamily, are coexpressed by all major cells implicated in atherosclerosis, namely activated T-lymphocytes, vascular ECs, SMCs, and monocytes/macrophages. Both, the receptor and the ligand are functional and CD40/CD40L interactions enhance the expression of various proatherogenic molecules like adhesion molecules, various chemokines (eg, MCP-1), cytokines, growth factors, and MMPs. In addition, CD40L-mediated functions include prothrombotic actions by enhancing the expression of tissue factor and diminishing the expression of thrombomodulin.124 OxLDL may play a role as an initial trigger of CD40/CD40L expression.125 The importance of CD40 signaling in atherosclerotic plaque development has been demonstrated using LDL receptor deficient mice. Interrupting CD40 signaling, drastically reduced de novo formation, and progression of established lesions.126,127 It also significantly enhanced the lesional content of collagen in mouse atheroma127,128 suggesting a change in plaque phenotype. Platelet activation induced by plaque rupture results in increased surface expression of CD40L, which is then cleaved. Circulating soluble (s) CD40L may activate ECs and CD40 expressed in other cells constitutive for the atherosclerotic plaque and induce a proinflammatory cascade in the vessel wall. Human studies indicated that sCD40L is associated with high intraplaque lipid content in patients with carotid atheroma,129 thus identifying high-risk lesions.
Elevated plasma concentrations of sCD40L have been observed in patients with ACS in the CAPTURE study, which was associated with increased risk for death or non-fatal MI.130 Patients with elevated sCD40L levels benefited from early antiplatelet therapy with abciximab in this study and also from early statin therapy in the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study.131 In another study, the predictive value of sCD40L was shown to be independent of troponin and CRP.132 Finally, data from the FRISC trial133 demonstrated that sCD40L levels are modified by a polymorphism in the CD40LG gene, were again related to outcome, and identified a subgroup particularly benefiting from antithrombotic and early invasive treatment. Thus, sCD40L could serve as a marker of increased thrombotic risk in ACS and may guide aggressive treatment. However, results have to be replicated in further large studies and a number of analytical issues need to be resolved before this biomarker may be used routinely.

Summary and Conclusions

Various molecules involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis predict plaque destabilization and rupture and subsequent clinical complications. They are important research tools and probably useful surrogate markers of atherosclerosis in early clinical “proof of concept” studies.134,135 But does the measure of a substantial relative risk (usually in the order of 2- to 3-fold) for coronary events qualify these molecules as useful biomarkers for the clinical routine? Probably not, as suggested by the ongoing controversy regarding CRP. For none of the other molecules discussed here the evidence of a predictive value is so robust, and the database is as large as for CRP, yet the incremental value of CRP in clinical decision making has not been ultimately proven.
Recently it has been suggested136,137 that additional criteria need to be applied to a biomarker beyond the independence of its association with an end point, the reliability and accuracy of the test, documented by good sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and cost-effective issues. Such further test characteristics include likelihood ratios, model calibration, C-statistics, and area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Thus, we still have a long way to go until the most promising candidate molecules have been identified that might help us as clinicians in improving prediction of the deleterious clinical complications of atherosclerosis. To date, none of the biomarkers discussed here can be recommended to the physician for routine clinical use.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures
Wolfgang Koenig has received an unrestricted grant from diaDexus, as well as honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, and Abbott.

Footnote

Original received August 30, 2006; final version accepted October 16, 2006.

References

1.
Shah PK. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 15S–22S.
2.
Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1355–1374.
3.
Kushner I, Broder ML, Karp D. Control of the acute phase response. Serum C-reactive protein kinetics after acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 1978; 61: 235–242.
4.
Calabro P, Willerson JT, Yeh ET. Inflammatory cytokines stimulated C-reactive protein production by human coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1930.
5.
Yasojima K, Schwab C, McGeer EG, McGeer PL. Generation of C-reactive protein and complement components in atherosclerotic plaques. Am J Pathol. 2001; 158: 1039–1051.
6.
Burke AP, Tracy RP, Kolodgie F, Malcom GT, Zieske A, Kutys R, Pestaner J, Smialek J, Virmani R. Elevated C-reactive protein values and atherosclerosis in sudden coronary death: association with different pathologies. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2019–2023.
7.
Verma S, Devaraj S, Jialal I. Is C-reactive protein an innocent bystander or proatherogenic culprit? C-reactive protein promotes atherothrombosis. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2135–2150.
8.
Pepys MB, Hawkins PN, Kahan MC, Tennent GA, Gallimore JR, Graham D, CA, Zychlinsky A, de Diego J. Proinflammatory effects of bacterial recombinant human C-reactive protein are caused by contamination with bacterial products, not by C-reactive protein itself. Circ Res. 2005; 97: e97–e103.
9.
Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. Brit Med J. 2000; 321: 199–204.
10.
Danesh J, Wheeler JG, Hirschfield GM, Eda S, Eiriksdottir G, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Pepys MB, Gudnason V. C-reactive protein and other circulating markers of inflammation in the prediction of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1387–1397.
11.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994; 344: 1383–1389.
12.
Boekholdt SM, Hack CE, Sandhu MS, Luben R, Bingham SA, Wareham NJ, Peters RJ, Jukema JW, Day NE, Kastelein JJ, Khaw KT. C-reactive protein levels and coronary artery disease incidence and mortality in apparently healthy men and women: The EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study 1993–2003. Atherosclerosis. 2006; 187: 415–422.
13.
Koenig W, Löwel H, Baumert J, Meisinger C. C-reactive protein modulates risk prediction based on the Framingham Score: implications for future risk assessment: results from a large cohort study in southern Germany. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1349–1353.
14.
Cushman M, Arnold AM, Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Polak JF, Tracy RP. C-reactive protein and the 10-year incidence of coronary heart disease in older men and women: the cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2005; 112: 25–31.
15.
Rattazzi M, Puato M, Faggin E, Bertipaglia B, Zambon A, Pauletto P. C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in vascular disease: culprits or passive bystanders? J Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1787–1803.
16.
Huber SA, Sakkinen P, Conze D, Hardin N, Tracy R. Interleukin-6 exacerbates early atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2364–2367.
17.
Kerr R, Stirling D, Ludlam CA. Interleukin 6 and haemostasis. Br J Haematol. 2001; 115: 3–12.
18.
Seino Y, Ikeda U, Ikeda M, Yamamoto K, Misawa Y, Hasegawa T, Kano S, Shimada K. Interleukin 6 gene transcripts are expressed in human atherosclerotic lesions. Cytokine. 1994; 6: 87–91.
19.
Rus HG, Vlaicu R, Niculescu F. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 protein and gene expression in human arterial atherosclerotic wall. Atherosclerosis. 1996; 127: 263–271.
20.
Schieffer B, Schieffer E, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Hilfiker A, Kovanen PT, Kaartinen M, Nussberger J, Harringer W, Drexler H. Expression of angiotensin II and interleukin 6 in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques: potential implications for inflammation and plaque instability. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1372–1378.
21.
Schieffer B, Selle T, Hilfiker A, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Grote K, Tietge UJ, Trautwein C, Luchtefeld M, Schmittkamp C, Heeneman S, Daemen MJ, Drexler H. Impact of interleukin-6 on plaque development and morphology in experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3493–3500.
22.
Maier W, Altwegg LA, Corti R, Gay S, Hersberger M, Maly FE, Sutsch G, Roffi M, Neidhart M, Eberli FR, Tanner FC, Gobbi S, von Eckardstein A, Luscher TF. Inflammatory markers at the site of ruptured plaque in acute myocardial infarction: locally increased interleukin-6 and serum amyloid A but decreased C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1355–1361.
23.
Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Fantuzzi G, Caligiuri G, Rebuzzi AG, Ginnetti F, Dinarello CA, Maseri A. Increasing levels of interleukin (IL)-1Ra and IL-6 during the first 2 days of hospitalization in unstable angina are associated with increased risk of in-hospital coronary events. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2079–2084.
24.
Lindmark E, Diderholm E, Wallentin L, Siegbahn A. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 286: 2107–2113.
25.
Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1767–1772.
26.
Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rossouw JE, Siscovick DS, Mouton CP, Rifai N, Wallace RB, Jackson RD, Pettinger MB, Ridker PM. Inflammatory biomarkers, hormone replacement therapy, and incident coronary heart disease: prospective analysis from the Women’s Health Initiative observational study. J Am Med Assoc. 2002; 288: 980–987.
27.
Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Tracy RP, Corti MC, Wacholder S, Ettinger WH Jr, Heimovitz H, Cohen HJ, Wallace R. Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 1999; 106: 506–512.
28.
Volpato S, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Balfour J, Chaves P, Fried LP, Harris TB. Cardiovascular disease, interleukin-6, and risk of mortality in older women: the women’s health and aging study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 947–953.
29.
Gracie JA, Robertson SE, McInnes IB. Interleukin-18. J Leukoc Biol. 2003; 73: 213–224.
30.
Okamura H, Tsutsi H, Komatsu T, Yutsudo M, Hakura A, Tanimoto T, Torigoe K, Okura T, Nukada Y, Hattori K, Akita K, Namba M, Tanabe F, Konishi K, Fukuda S, Kurimoto M. Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN- γ production by T cells. Nature. 1995; 378: 88–91.
31.
Gerdes N, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Reynolds RS, Young JL, Schonbeck U. Expression of Interleukin (IL)-18 and functional IL-18 receptor on human vascular endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages: implications for atherogenesis. J Exp Med. 2002; 195: 245–257.
32.
Nold M, Goede A, Eberhardt W, Pfeilschifter J, Muehl H. IL-18 initiates release of matrix metalloproteinase-9 from peripheral blood mononuclear cells without affecting tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1: suppression by TNF-α blockage and modulation by IL-10. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003; 367: 68–75.
33.
Ishida Y, Migita K, Izumi Y, Nakao K, Ida H, Kawakami A, Abiru S, Ishibashi H, Eguchi K, Ishii N. The role of IL-18 in the modulation of matrix metalloproteinases and migration of human natural killer (NK) cells. FEBS Lett. 2004; 569: 156–160.
34.
Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, Besnard S, Leseche G, Chvatchko Y, Tedgui A. Expression of interleukin-18 in human atherosclerotic plaques and relation to plaque instability. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1598–1603.
35.
Mallat Z, Corbaz A, Scoazec A, Graber P, Alouani S, Esposito B, Humbert Y, Chvatchko Y, Tedgui A. Interleukin-18/interleukin-18 binding protein signaling modulates atherosclerotic lesion development and stability. Circ Res. 2001; 89: e41–e45.
36.
Elhage R, Jawien J, Rudling M, Ljunggren HG, Takeda K, Akira S, Bayard F, Hansson GK. Reduced atherosclerosis in interleukin-18 deficient apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 59: 234–240.
37.
Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Daugherty A. Interleukin-18 enhances atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-/- mice through release of Interferon-γ. Circ Res. 2002; 90: e34–e38.
38.
Tenger C, Sundborger A, Jawien J, Zhou X. IL-18 accelerates atherosclerosis accompanied by elevation of IFN-γ and CXCL16 expression independently of T cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 791–796.
39.
De Nooijer R, von der Thusen JH, Verkleij CJ, Kuiper J, Jukema JW, van der Wall EE, van Berkel JC, Biessen EA. Overexpression of IL-18 decreases intimal collagen content and promotes a vulnerable plaque phenotype in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2313–2319.
40.
Mallat Z, Henry P, Fressonnet R, Alouani S, Scoazec A, Beaufils P, Chvatchko Y, Tedgui A. Increased plasma concentrations of interleukin-18 in acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2002; 88: 467–469.
41.
Kawasaki D, Tsujino T, Morimoto S, Fujioka Y, Naito Y, Okumura T, Masutani M, Shimizu H, Yuba M, Ueda A, Ohyanagi M, Kashiwamura S, Okamura H, Iwasaki T. Usefulness of circulating interleukin-18 concentration in acute myocardial infarction as a risk factor for late restenosis after emergency coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 1258–1261.
42.
Narins CR, Lin DA, Burton PB, Jin Z-G, Berk BC. Interleukin-18 and interleukin-18 binding protein levels before and after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without recent myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94: 1285–1287.
43.
Blankenberg S, Tiret L, Bickel C, Peetz D, Cambien F, Meyer J, Rupprecht HJ. AtheroGene Investigators. Interleukin-18 is a strong predictor of cardiovascular death in stable and unstable angina. Circulation. 2002; 106: 24–30.
44.
Tiret L, Godefroy T, Lubos E, Nicaud V, Tregouet DA, Barbaux S, Schnabel R, Bickel C, Espinola-Klein C, Poirier O, Perret C, Munzel T, Rupprecht HJ, Lackner K, Cambien F, Blankenberg S. AtheroGene Investigators. Genetic analysis of the interleukin-18 system highlights the role of the interleukin-18 gene in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2005; 112: 643–650.
45.
Blankenberg S, Luc G, Ducimetiere P, Arveiler D, Ferrieres J, Amouyel P, Evans A, Cambien F, Tiret L. PRIME Study Group Interleukin-18 and the risk of coronary heart disease in European men: the Prospective Epidemiological Study of Myocardial Infarction (PRIME). Circulation. 2003; 108: 2453–2459.
46.
Koenig W, Khuseyinova N, Baumert J, Thorand B, Loewel H Chambless L, Meisinger C, Schneider A, Martin S, Kolb H, Herder C. Increased concentrations of C-reactive protein and Interleukin-6 but not Interleukin-18 are independently associated with incident coronary events in middle-aged men and women. Results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984–2002. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. In press.
47.
Jessup W, Kritharides L, Stocker R. Lipid oxidation in atherogenesis: an overview. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004; 32: 134–138.
48.
Huang Y, Mironova M, Lopes-Virella MF. Oxidized LDL stimulates matrix metalloproteinase-1 expression in human vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2640–2647.
49.
Xu XP, Meisel SR, Ong JM, Kaul S, Cercek B, Rajavashisth TB, Sharifi B, Shah PK. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein regulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 and its tissue inhibitor in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Circulation. 1999; 99: 993–998.
50.
Li D, Liu L, Chen H, Sawamura T, Ranganathan S, Mehta JL. LOX-1 mediates oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced expression of matrix metalloproteinases in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Circulation. 2003; 107: 612–617.
51.
Li D, Liu L, Chen H, Sawamura T, Mehta JL. LOX-1, an oxidized LDL endothelial receptor, induces CD40/CD40L signaling in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 816–821.
52.
Holvoet P, Vanhaecke J, Janssens S, Van de Werf F, Collen D. Oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-modified LDL in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1487–1494.
53.
Toshima S, Hasegawa A, Kurabayashi M, Itabe H, Takano T, Sugano J, Shimamura K, Kimura J, Michishita I, Suzuki T, Nagai R. Circulating oxidized low density lipoprotein levels. A biochemical risk marker for coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 2243–2247.
54.
Ehara S, Ueda M, Naruko T, Haze K, Itoh A, Otsuka M, Komatsu R, Matsuo T, Itabe H, Takano T, Tsukamoto Y, Yoshiyama M, Takeuchi K, Yoshikawa J, Becker AE. Elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1955–1960.
55.
Salonen JT, Yla-Herttuala S, Yamamoto R, Butler S, Korpela H, Salonen R, Nyyssonen K, Palinski W, Witztum JL. Autoantibody against oxidised LDL and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992; 339: 883–887.
56.
Meisinger C, Baumert J, Khuseyinova N, Loewel H, Koenig W. Plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein, a strong predictor for acute coronary heart disease events in apparently healthy, middle-aged men from the general population. Circulation. 2005; 112: 651–657.
57.
Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, Hsu A, Topol EJ. Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: metaanalysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003; 361: 2017–2023.
58.
Raes M, Michiels C, Remacle J. Comparative study of the enzymatic defense systems against oxygen-derived free radicals: the key role of glutathione peroxidase. Free Radic Biol Med. 1987; 3: 3–7.
59.
Ursini F, Maiorino M, Roveri A. Phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx): more than an antioxidant enzyme? Biomed Environ Sci. 1997; 10: 327–332.
60.
Guo Z, Van Remmen H, Yang H, Chen X, Mele J, Vijg J, Epstein CJ, Ho YS, Richardson A. Changes in expression of antioxidant enzymes affect cell-mediated LDL oxidation and oxidized LDL-induced apoptosis in mouse aortic cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 1131–1138.
61.
Forgione MA, Weiss N, Heydrick S, Cap A, Klings ES, Bierl C, Eberhardt RT, Farber HW, Loscalzo J. Cellular glutathione peroxidase deficiency and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H1255–H1261.
62.
Lackner KJ, Blankenberg S. Atherosclerosis, oxidative stress and glutathione peroxidase-1: a new kid on the block. Ital Heart J. 2004; 5: 169–172.
63.
Blankenberg S, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Torzewski M, Hafner G, Tiret L, Smieja M, Cambien F, Meyer J, Lackner KJ. AtheroGene Investigators. Glutathione peroxidase 1 activity and cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1605–1613.
64.
Zalewski A, Macphee C. Role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis: biology, epidemiology, and possible therapeutic target. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 923–931.
65.
Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, Suckling KE, Holmes SD, Chamberlain P, Macphee CH. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase: a potential new risk factor for coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 150: 413–419.
66.
Macphee CH, Moores KE, Boyd HF, Dhanak D, Ife RJ, Leach CA, Leake DS, Milliner KJ, Patterson RA, Suckling KE, Tew DG, Hickey DM. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, generates two bioactive products during the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein: use of a novel inhibitor. Biochem J. 1999; 338: 479–487.
67.
Packard CJ, O’Reilly DS, Caslake MJ, McMahon AD, Ford I, Cooney J, Macphee CH, Suckling KE, Krishna M, Wilkinson FE, Rumley A, Lowe GD. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 as an independent predictor of coronary heart disease. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1148–1155.
68.
Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Bang H, Coresh J, Folsom AR, Heiss G, Sharrett AR. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and risk for incident coronary heart disease in middle-aged men and women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2004; 109: 837–842.
69.
Koenig W, Khuseyinova N, Lowel H, Trischler G, Meisinger C. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 adds to risk prediction of incident coronary events by C-reactive protein in apparently healthy middle-aged men from the general population: results from the 14-year follow-up of a large cohort from southern Germany. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1903–1908.
70.
Oei HH, van der Meer IM, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Stijnen T, Breteler MMB, Witteman JCM. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity is associated with risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 570–575.
71.
O’Donoghue M, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and its association with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) Trial. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1745–1752.
72.
Oldgren J, James SK, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. Lp-PLA2 Does not predict mortality or new ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome patients. Circulation. 2005; 112: II-387. Abstract.
73.
James SK, Oldgren J, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. No Relation between levels of Lp-PLA2 and other inflammatory markers or outcome in non St-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2005; 112: II-387. Abstract.
74.
Brilakis ES, McConnell JP, Lennon RJ, Elesber AA, Meyer JG, Berger PB. Association of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels with coronary artery disease risk factors, angiographic coronary artery disease, and major adverse events at follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 137–144.
75.
Koenig W, Twardella D, Brenner H, Rothenbacher D. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 predicts future cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease independently of traditional risk factors, markers of inflammation, renal function and hemodynamic stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1586–1593.
76.
Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC, Bang H, Coresh J, Folsom AR, Chambless LE, Myerson M, Wu KK, Sharrett AR, Boerwinkle E. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and risk for incident ischemic stroke in middle-aged men and women in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 2479–2484.
77.
Hurt-Camejo E, Camejo G, Peilot H, Oorni K, Kovanen P. Phospholipase A(2) in vascular disease. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 298–304.
78.
Anthonsen MW, Stengel D, Hourton D, Ninio E, Johansen B. Mildly oxidized LDL induces expression of group IIa secretory phospholipase A(2) in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1276–1282.
79.
Sartipy P, Camejo G, Svensson L, Hurt-Camejo E. Phospholipase A(2) modification of low density lipoproteins forms small high density particles with increased affinity for proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 25913–25920.
80.
Leitinger N, Watson AD, Hama SY, Ivandic B, Qiao JH, Huber J, Faull KF, Grass DS, Navab M, Fogelman AM, de Beer FC, Lusis AJ, Berliner JA. Role of group II secretory phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis: 2. Potential involvement of biologically active oxidized phospholipids. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1291–1298.
81.
Boekholdt SM, Keller TT, Wareham NJ, Luben R, Bingham SA, Day NE, Sandhu MS, Jukema JW, Kastelein JJ, Hack CE, Khaw KT. Serum levels of type II secretory phospholipase A2 and the risk of future coronary artery disease in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 839–846.
82.
Kugiyama K, Ota Y, Takazoe K, Moriyama Y, Kawano H, Miyao Y, Sakamoto T, Soejima H, Ogawa H, Doi H, Sugiyama S, Yasue H. Circulating levels of secretory type II phospholipase A(2) predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1280–1284.
83.
Kugiyama K, Ota Y, Sugiyama S, Kawano H, Doi H, Soejima H, Miyamoto S, Ogawa H, Takazoe K, Yasue H. Prognostic value of plasma levels of secretory type II phospholipase A2 in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 718–722.
84.
Mallat Z, Steg PG, Benessiano J, Tanguy ML, Fox KA, Collet JP, Dabbous OH, Henry P, Carruthers KF, Dauphin A, Arguelles CS, Masliah J, Hugel B, Montalescot G, Freyssinet JM, Asselain B, Tedgui A. Circulating secretory phospholipase A2 activity predicts recurrent events in patients with severe acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1249–1257.
85.
Nicholls SJ, Hazen SL. Myeloperoxidase and cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1102–1111.
86.
Eiserich JP, Baldus S, Brennan ML, Ma W, Zhang C, Tousson A, Castro L, Lusis AJ, Nauseef WM, White CR, Freeman BA. Myeloperoxidase, a leukocyte-derived vascular NO oxidase. Science. 2002; 296: 2391–2394.
87.
Fu X, Kassim SY, Parks WC, Heinecke JW. Hypochlorous acid oxygenates the cysteine switch domain of pro-matrilysin (MMP-7). A mechanism for matrix metalloproteinase activation and atherosclerotic plaque rupture by myeloperoxidase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 41279–41287.
88.
Shabani F, McNeil J, Tippett L. The oxidative inactivation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) by hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is suppressed by anti-rheumatic drugs. Free Radic Res. 1998; 28: 115–123.
89.
Baldus S, Heeschen C, Meinertz T, Zeiher AM, Eiserich JP, Munzel T, Simoons ML, Hamm CW. CAPTURE Investigators. Myeloperoxidase serum levels predict risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1440–1445.
90.
Brennan ML, Penn MS, Van Lente F, Nambi V, Shishehbor MH, Aviles RJ, Goormastic M, Pepoy ML, McErlean ES, Topol EJ, Nissen SE, Hazen SL. Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1595–1604.
91.
Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 251–262.
92.
Jones CB, Sane DC, Herrington DM. Matrix metalloproteinases: a review of their structure and role in acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 59: 812–823.
93.
Galis ZS, Sukhova GK, Lark MW, Libby P. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases and matrix degrading activity in vulnerable regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94: 2493–2503.
94.
Inokubo Y, Hanada H, Ishizaka H, Fukushi T, Kamada T, Okumura K. Plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 are increased in the coronary circulation in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 211–217.
95.
Kai H, Ikeda H, Yasukawa H, Kai M, Seki Y, Kuwahara F, Ueno T, Sugi K, Imaizumi T. Peripheral blood levels of matrix metalloproteases-2 and -9 are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 368–372.
96.
Eckart RE, Uyehara CF, Shry EA, Furgerson JL, Krasuski RA. Matrix metalloproteinases in patients with myocardial infarction and percutaneous revascularization. J Interv Cardiol. 2004; 17: 27–31.
97.
Blankenberg S, Rupprecht HJ, Poirier O, Bickel C, Smieja M, Hafner G, Meyer J, Cambien F, Tiret L. AtheroGene Investigators. Plasma concentrations and genetic variation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1579–1585.
98.
Lubos E, Schnabel R, Rupprecht HJ, Bickel C, Messow CM, Prigge S, Cambien F, Tiret L, Munzel T, Blankenberg S. Prognostic value of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 for cardiovascular death among patients with cardiovascular disease: results from the AtheroGene study. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 150–156.
99.
Cavusoglu E, Ruwende C, Chopra V, Yanamadala S, Eng C, Clark LT, Pinsky DJ, Marmur JD. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006; 151: 1101.e1–e8.
100.
Mach F. The role of chemokines in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001; 3: 243–251.
101.
Yla-Herttula S, Lipton BA, Rosenfeld ME, Sarkioja T, Yoshimura T, Leonard EJ. Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in macrophage-rich areas of human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. PNAS. 1991; 88: 5252–5256.
102.
Egashira K. Molecular mechanisms mediating inflammation in vascular disease: special reference to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Hypertension. 2003; 41: 834–841.
103.
Yamamoto T, Eckes B, Mauch C, Hartmann K, Krieg T. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 enhances gene expression and synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in human fibroblasts by an autocrine IL-1 α -loop. J Immunol. 2000; 164: 6174–6179.
104.
Namiki M, Kawashima S, Yamashita T, Ozaki M, Hirase T, Ishida T, Inoue N, Hirata K, Matsukawa A, Morishita R, Kaneda Y, Yokoyama M. Local overexpression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 at vessel wall induces infiltration of macrophages and formation of atherosclerotic lesion: synergism with hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 115–120.
105.
Inoue S, Egashira K, Ni W, Kitamoto S, Usui M, Otani K, Ishibashi M, Hiasa K, Nishida K, Takeshita A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy limits progression, and destabilization of established atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–knockout mice. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2700–2706.
106.
De Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Gibson CM, Antman EM, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, Braunwald E. Association between plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003; 107: 690–695.
107.
Herder C, Baumert J, Thorand B, Martin S, Lowel H, Kolb H, Koenig W. Chemokines and incident coronary heart disease: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984–2002. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 2147–2152.
108.
Iyer S, Acharya KR. Role of placenta growth factor in cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002; 12: 128–134.
109.
Luttun A, Tjwa M, Moons L, Wu Y, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Liao F, Nagy JA, Hooper A, Priller J, De Klerck B, Compernolle V, Daci E, Bohlen P, Dewerchin M, Herbert JM, Fava R, Matthys P, Carmeliet G, Collen D, Dvorak HF, Hicklin DJ, Carmeliet P. Revascularization of ischemic tissues by PlGF treatment, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, arthritis and atherosclerosis by anti-Flt1. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 831–840.
110.
Autiero M, Luttun A, Tjwa M, Carmeliet P. Placental growth factor and its receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1: novel targets for stimulation of ischemic tissue revascularization and inhibition of angiogenic and inflammatory disorders. J Thromb Haemost. 2003; 1: 1356–1370.
111.
Khurana R, Moons L, Shafi S, Luttun A, Collen D, Martin JF, Carmeliet P, Zachary IC. Placental growth factor promotes atherosclerotic intimal thickening and macrophage accumulation. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2828–2836.
112.
Heeschen C, Dimmeler S, Fichtlscherer S, Hamm CW, Berger J, Simoons ML, Zeiher AM. CAPTURE Investigators. Prognostic value of placental growth factor in patients with acute chest pain. J Am Med Assoc. 2004; 291: 435–441.
113.
Lenderink T, Heeschen C, Fichtlscherer S, Dimmeler S, Hamm CW, Zeiher AM, Simoons ML, Boersma E, CAPTURE Investigators. Elevated placental growth factor levels are associated with adverse outcomes at four-year follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 307–311.
114.
Bayes-Genis A, Conover CA, Overgaard MT, Bailey KR, Christiansen M, Holmes DR Jr, Virmani R, Oxvig C, Schwartz RS. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A as a marker of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1022–1029.
115.
Sangiorgi G, Mauriello A, Bonanno E, Oxvig C, Conover CA, Christiansen M, Trimarchi S, Rampoldi V, Holmes DR Jr, Schwartz RS, Spagnoli LG. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a is markedly expressed by monocyte-macrophage cells in vulnerable and ruptured carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a link between inflammation and cerebrovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2201–2211.
116.
Bunn RC, Fowlkes JL. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein proteolysis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 14: 176–181.
117.
Lund J, Qin QP, Ilva T, Pettersson K, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Porela P, Pulkki K. Circulating pregnancy-associated plasma protein a predicts outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome but no troponin I elevation. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1924–1926.
118.
Heeschen C, Dimmeler S, Hamm CW, Fichtlscherer S, Simoons ML, Zeiher AM, CAPTURE Study Investigators. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A levels in patients with acute coronary syndromes: comparison with markers of systemic inflammation, platelet activation, and myocardial necrosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 229–237.
119.
Lund J, Qin QP, Ilva T, Nikus K, Eskola M, Porela P, Kokkala S, Pulkki K, Pettersson K, Voipio-Pulkki LM. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A: a biomarker in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Ann Med. 2006; 38: 221–228.
120.
Cosin-Sales J, Christiansen M, Kaminski P, Oxvig C, Overgaard MT, Cole D, Holt DW, Kaski JC. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and its endogenous inhibitor, the proform of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP), are related to complex stenosis morphology in patients with stable angina pectoris. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1724–1728.
121.
Elesber AA, Conover CA, Denktas AE, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr, Overgaard MT, Christiansen M, Oxvig C, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prognostic value of circulating pregnancy-associated plasma protein levels in patients with chronic stable angina. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1678–1684.
122.
Conti E, Andreotti F, Zuppi C. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein a as predictor of outcome in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004; 109: e211–e212.
123.
Qin QP, Kokkala S, Lund J, Tamm N, Qin X, Lepantalo M, Pettersson K. Immunoassays developed for pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in pregnancy may not recognize PAPP-A in acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 398–404.
124.
Schonbeck U, Libby P. CD40 signaling and plaque instability. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1092–1103.
125.
Schonbeck U, Gerdes N, Varo N, Reynolds RS, Horton DB, Bavendiek U, Robbie L, Ganz P, Kinlay S, Libby P. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein augments and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors limit CD40 and CD40L expression in human vascular cells. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2888–2893.
126.
Mach F, Schonbeck U, Sukhova GK, Atkinson E, Libby P. Reduction of atherosclerosis in mice by inhibition of CD40 signalling. Nature. 1998; 394: 200–203.
127.
Schonbeck U, Sukhova GK, Shimizu K, Mach F, Libby P. Inhibition of CD40 signaling limits evolution of established atherosclerosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 7458–7463.
128.
Lutgens E, Cleutjens KB, Heeneman S, Koteliansky VE, Burkly LC, Daemen MJ. Both early and delayed anti-CD40L antibody treatment induces a stable plaque phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 7464–7469.
129.
Blake GJ, Ostfeld RJ, Yucel EK, Varo N, Schonbeck U, Blake MA, Gerhard M, Ridker PM, Libby P, Lee RT. Soluble CD40 ligand levels indicate lipid accumulation in carotid atheroma: an in vivo study with high-resolution MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: e11–e14.
130.
Heeschen C, Dimmeler S, Hamm CW, van den Brand MJ, Boersma E, Zeiher AM, Simoons ML, CAPTURE Study Investigators. Soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1104–1111.
131.
Kinlay S, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Rifai N, Sasiela WJ, Szarek M, Ganz P, Libby P, Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators. Effect of atorvastatin on risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome associated with high soluble CD40 ligand in the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study. Circulation. 2004; 110: 386–391.
132.
Varo N, de Lemos JA, Libby P, Morrow DA, Murphy SA, Nuzzo R, Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Schonbeck U. Soluble CD40L: risk prediction after acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1049–1052.
133.
Malarstig A, Lindahl B, Wallentin L, Siegbahn A. Soluble CD40L levels are regulated by the -3459 A > G polymorphism and predict myocardial infarction and the efficacy of antithrombotic treatment in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1667–1673.
134.
Vasan RS. Biomarkers of cardiovascular disease: molecular basis and practical considerations. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2335–2362.
135.
Tardif JC, Heinonen T, Orloff D, Libby P. Vascular biomarkers and surrogates in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2936–2942.
136.
Stampfer MJ, Ridker PM, Dzau VJ. Risk factor criteria. Circulation. 2004; 109 (25 Suppl 1): IV3–5.
137.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Liu K, Tian L, Greenland P. Narrative review: Assessment of C-reactive protein in risk prediction for cardiovascular disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145: 35–42.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Go to Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

On the cover: Iron in carotid artery plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:154–160.

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Pages: 15 - 26
PubMed: 17082488

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Published online: 2 November 2006
Published in print: 1 January 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. biomarkers
  2. atherosclerosis
  3. pathophysiology
  4. risk prediction

Notes

Editor: Willliam Haynes 
 Noninvasive Assessment of Atherosclerosis: From Structure to Function
 ATVB In Focus
 

Previous Brief Reviews in this Series: 
 
 •Choudhury RP, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Fisher EA, Fayad ZA. MRI and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque: emerging applications and molecular imaging. 2002;22:1065–1074.
 •Bonetti PO, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk. 2003;23:168–175.
 •Oliver JJ, Webb DJ. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness and risk of atherosclerotic events. 2003;23:554–566.
 •Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Litovsky S, Willerson JT, Casscells W. Finding vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques: is it worth the effort? 2004;24:1775–1782.
 •Morrow JD. Quantification of isoprostanes as indices of oxidant stress and the risk of atherosclerosis in humans. 2005;25:279–286.
 •Feinbloom D, Bauer KA. Assessment of hemostatis risk factors in predicting arterial thrombotic events. 2005;25:2043–2053.
 •Oliver JJ, Webb DJ, Newby, DE. Stimulated tissue plasminogen activator release as a marker of endothelial function in humans. 2005:25:2470–2479.
 


Authors

Affiliations

Wolfgang Koenig
From the Department of Internal Medicine II–Cardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Germany.
Natalie Khuseyinova
From the Department of Internal Medicine II–Cardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Germany.

Notes

Correspondence to Wolfgang Koenig, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC, Department of Internal Medicine II–Cardiology, University of Ulm Medical Center, Robert-Koch Str. 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany. E-mail [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 8, (2359), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082359
    Crossref
  2. Network Pharmacology and Experimental Verification: SanQi-DanShen Treats Coronary Heart Disease by Inhibiting the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway, Drug Design, Development and Therapy, Volume 18, (4529-4550), (2024).https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S480248
    Crossref
  3. Assessment of the Level of Matrix Metalloproteinases, VEGF and MicroRNA-34a in Patients With Non-obstructive and Obstructive Lesions of the Coronary Arteries, Kardiologiia, 64, 4, (14-21), (2024).https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2024.4.n2622
    Crossref
  4. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the clinical outcomes in patients with acute uncomplicated type-B aortic dissection undergoing optimal medical therapy, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 24, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03596-y
    Crossref
  5. Association Between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Metabolic Syndrome Among Hispanic/Latino Participants of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 22, 5, (327-336), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2023.0298
    Crossref
  6. Programmed death of macrophages in atherosclerosis: mechanisms and therapeutic targets, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 21, 5, (312-325), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-023-00957-0
    Crossref
  7. Acute exercise-induced inflammatory and thrombotic response in hypertensive patients, European Journal of Applied Physiology, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05599-9
    Crossref
  8. The relationship between the systemic immune inflammatory index and computerized tomography guided coronary lesion severity in diabetic patients, Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 52, 6, (675-679), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23680
    Crossref
  9. Métodos de controle da fadiga em atletas de futebol, Cadernos UniFOA, 18, 53, (1-8), (2023).https://doi.org/10.47385/cadunifoa.v18.n53.4413
    Crossref
  10. Relationship between the lymphocyte to C‑reactive protein ratio and coronary artery disease severity, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 27, 2, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12348
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability and Rupture
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
  • Vol. 27
  • No. 1

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
  • Vol. 27
  • No. 1
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response