The Prostaglandin E2 Receptor EP4 Is Expressed by Human Platelets and Potently Inhibits Platelet Aggregation and Thrombus Formation*
- Other version(s) of this article
You are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions:
Abstract
Objective—Low concentrations of prostaglandin (PG) E2 enhance platelet aggregation, whereas high concentrations inhibit it. The effects of PGE2 are mediated through 4 G protein-coupled receptors, termed E-type prostaglindin (EP) receptor EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. The platelet-stimulating effect of PGE2 has been suggested to involve EP3 receptors. Here we analyzed the receptor usage relating to the inhibitory effect of PGE2.
Methods and Results—Using flow cytometry, we found that human platelets expressed EP4 receptor protein. A selective EP4 agonist (ONO AE1-329) potently inhibited the platelet aggregation as induced by ADP or collagen. This effect could be completely reversed by an EP4 antagonist, but not by PGI2, PGD2, and thromboxane receptor antagonists or cyclooxygenase inhibition. Moreover, an EP4 antagonist enhanced the PGE2-induced stimulation of platelet aggregation, indicating a physiological antiaggregatory activity of EP4 receptors. The inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist was accompanied by attenuated Ca2+ flux, inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, and downregulation of P-selectin. Most importantly, adhesion of platelets to fibrinogen under flow and in vitro thrombus formation were effectively prevented by the EP4 agonist. In this respect, the EP4 agonist synergized with acetylsalicylic acid.
Conclusion—These results are suggestive of EP4 receptor activation as a novel antithrombotic strategy.
Subjects with increased platelet reactivity are at increased prospective risk for coronary events and death. A number of pathophysiological states, such as atherosclerosis, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, are associated with increased platelet reactivity and thrombogenic potential. Under inflammatory conditions, the synthesis of prostanoids in endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells is highly increased. Predominantly, the biosynthesis of prostaglandin (PG) E2 is enhanced in vascular smooth muscle cells1 and macrophages2,3 by inflammatory mediators.
Prostanoids are involved in hemostasis by differentially influencing platelet aggregation. Although thromboxane (TX) A2, produced in platelets, and PGH2, released untransformed from activated/dysfunctional endothelium, are potent stimulators of platelet aggregation,4 PGI2 and PGD2 are known to inhibit platelet aggregation.5
PGE2 shows a biphasic, concentration-dependent effect on platelet aggregation. Although high concentrations inhibit platelet aggregation, lower concentrations enhance it.6–11 PGE2 binds and activates 4 G protein–coupled receptors, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. Each of these receptors has a distinct pharmacological signature and intracellular signal transduction.12,13,14 Stimulation of the EP3 receptors results in elevation of free intracellular Ca2+ levels, whereas stimulation of the EP2 and EP4 receptors usually increases intracellular cAMP levels through activation of Gs protein,12 resulting in a decrease of intracellular Ca2+ levels.
Human platelets contain mRNA for EP1 receptors, all of the EP3 splice variants, and EP4; however, mRNA for EP2 receptors is lacking in platelets.15 The proaggregatory effect of PGE2 has been ascribed to the activation of the EP3 receptor, leading to inhibition of the increase in cAMP,16,17 an increased mobilization of Ca2+,18 and increased P-selectin expression on platelets.19,20 An EP3 antagonist has been proposed to be useful for antithrombotic therapy.19 Here we demonstrate that a selective EP4 agonist inhibits platelet aggregation, Ca2+ mobilization, and upregulation of P-selection. In November 2009, we first reported these novel findings in a meeting abstract.21 Thereafter, while the current report was in preparation, 3 articles were published that overlap with the data in our abstract and fully confirm our findings, as they report that an EP4 antagonist reverses the inhibition by PGE2 of U46619-induced platelet aggregation22; that the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 prevents the platelet-activating factor (PAF)-induced platelet aggregation, U46619-induced P-selectin upregulation, and thrombin receptor-mediated Ca2+ flux in platelets23; and that murine platelets are less sensitive to EP4 activation than human platelets.24 Regrettably, none of these authors acknowledged our work. In excess of these observations, we report here that (1) platelets express EP4 receptor protein, (2) activation of EP4 receptors counteracts the activation of glycoprotein [GP] IIb/IIIa, and (3) hence prevents the binding of platelets to fibrinogen. Moreover, (4) these inhibitory effects of the EP4 receptor on platelet activation translate to potent antithrombotic activity of the EP4 agonist as shown by in vitro thrombus formation assays using whole blood, and (5) EP4 activation enhances the inhibitory effect of acetylsalicylic acid. Therefore, we propose that selective EP4 receptor agonists may provide a novel antithrombotic strategy in humans.
Materials and Methods
Reagents are described in the supplemental materials, available online at http://atvb.ahajournals.org.
Platelet Aggregation
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical University of Graz. Before blood sampling from healthy volunteers, all donors signed an informed consent form. Human platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma were prepared from citrated whole blood by centrifugation. Platelet aggregation was recorded at 37°C with constant stirring (1000 rpm) in an Aggrecorder-II (KDK Corp, Kyoto, Japan) as described.25–27 Platelet aggregation was measured as the increase in light transmission for 5 minutes, starting with the addition of ADP (2.5 to 20 μmol/L) or collagen (1.25 to 10 μg/mL) as proaggregatory stimulus. CaCl2 at a final concentration of 1 mmol/L was added 2 minutes before ADP or collagen. In some experiments acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L as lysine acetylsalicylic acid) was added to platelet rich plasma 30 minutes before the proaggregatory stimulus. To record inhibition of agonist-induced aggregation, PGE2 or other compounds were added 2 minutes before ADP or collagen. The antagonists or their vehicle were added 10 minutes before the respective agonist. Data were expressed as percentage of maximum light transmission, with nonstimulated platelet-rich plasma being 0% and platelet-poor plasma 100%.
Ca2+ Flux
Intracellular Ca2+ levels were analyzed by flow cytometry as described.27–29 Washed platelets were loaded with 5 μmol/L of the acetoxymethyl ester of Fluo-3 in the presence of 2.5 mmol/L probenecid at 37°C for 30 minutes and were then resuspended in PBS containing 0.9 mmol/L Ca2+ and 0.5 mmol/L Mg2+. Changes in intracellular free Ca2+ levels in response to ADP (10 to 1000 nmol/L) were detected as increase in fluorescence intensity of the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fluo-3 in the FL-1 channel.
Flow Cytometric Immunofluorescence Staining
Washed platelet preparations were fixed, permeabilized, and blocked using Ultra V blocking solution. Staining was done using an EP4 antibody or control IgG antibody (20 μg/mL) for 30 minutes on ice and subsequently incubated with an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-488 conjugated secondary antibody (4 μg/mL), with the required washing steps. The samples were read on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). To record P-selectin expression, platelets were activated by ADP (3 μmol/L) in the presence cytochalasin B (5 μg/mL) for 15 minutes at 37°C in the presence of the anti-CD62P–fluorescein isothiocyanate antibody.30 The samples were washed and fixed, and CD62P (P-selectin) upregulation was detected by flow cytometry. Activation of the fibrinogen receptor GPIIb/IIIa was assayed using the PAC-1 antibody, which recognizes a conformation-dependent determinant on the GPIIb/IIIa complex. Total receptor expression was determined with an anti-CD41 antibody directed against GPIIb. After incubation with PGE2 or other agonists for 10 minutes, the stimulation of the samples with ADP (3 μmol/L) was carried out at 37°C for 5 minutes in the presence of anti-CD41 or PAC-1 antibody, directly conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate. Pretreatment with antagonists or acetylsalicylic acid started 15 minutes before the agonist/vehicle treatment. The reaction was stopped; samples were washed and fixed and then analyzed by flow cytometry.31
Platelet Adhesion
Vena8 biochips (Cellix Ltd, Dublin, Ireland) were coated with fibrinogen (100 μg/mL) at 4°C overnight. On the next day, the chips were blocked with BSA (10 μg/mL) for 30 minutes at room temperature and then washed once more with PBS containing 0.9 mmol/L Ca2+ and 0.5 mmol/L Mg2+. Eighty-microliter aliquots of platelet-rich plasma were pretreated with vehicle, iloprost (3 nmol/L), or ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) for 5 minutes. Aliquots were then mixed with ADP (10 μmol/L) in the presence of 1 mmol/L CaCl2 (10 μL) and then immediately perfused over the fibrinogen-coated channels at constant shear stress of 0.5 dyne cm−2 for 3 minutes using the Mirus nanopump (Cellix). Platelet adhesion was recorded on an Olympus IX70 fluorescence microscope and an Olympus UPlanFI-×20/0.40 lens, using a Hamamatsu ORCA-ER digital camera and the Olympus Cell&
; software. Cell images of 3 microscopic fields from each channel were captured, and images were analyzed using DucoCell software (Cellix).
In Vitro Thrombogenesis
Vena8Fluoro+ Biochips (Cellix) were coated with collagen (200 μg/mL) at 4°C overnight. Blocking was performed with bovine serum albumin (10 μg/mL) for 30 minutes at room temperature followed by washing steps. Whole blood collected in 3.8% sodium citrate was incubated with 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (1 μmol/L) in the dark for 10 minutes. To record inhibition of thrombus formation, whole blood was treated with PGE2 (10 μmol/L), the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L), or acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L) for 10 minutes before the perfusion was started. The EP4 antagonist (ONO AE3-208; 1 and 10 μmol/L) or its vehicle was added 10 minutes before the respective agonist. CaCl2 at a final concentration of 1 mmol/L was added 2 minutes before the perfusion over the collagen-coated chip. Perfusion at a shear rate of 30 dynes cm−2 and microscopy were carried out as described above for platelet adhesion.
Statistical Analyses
Data are shown as mean±SEM for n observations. Comparisons of groups were performed using 1-way or 2-way ANOVA with the Dunnett post test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Probability values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
EP4 Receptor Stimulation Inhibits Platelet Aggregation
First, we tested the hypothesis that activation of EP4 receptors modulates platelet aggregation. Platelet-rich plasma was treated with various concentrations of the EP4 selective agonist ONO AE1-329 (0.01 to 300 nmol/L) for 7 minutes before ADP or collagen was added to induce platelet aggregation. The concentrations of ADP (2.5 to 20 μmol/L) and collagen (1.25 to 10 μg/mL) were adjusted to give submaximal aggregation. ONO AE1-329 itself did not induce platelet aggregation at concentrations up to 1 μmol/L (n=6, data not shown) but concentration-dependently attenuated both the ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation (Figure 1A and 1B). To investigate the role of EP4 receptors in the PGE2-induced effects on platelet function, samples were pretreated with the EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (300 nmol/L) for 10 minutes and then treated with PGE2 (3 to 300 nmol/L) for 7 minutes. Finally, platelet aggregation was initiated with ADP at concentrations that yielded half-maximal platelet aggregation. PGE2 alone did not trigger platelet aggregation under these conditions (n=6, data not shown) but slightly enhanced the ADP-induced aggregation. This effect was dramatically enhanced in the presence of the EP4 antagonist (Figure 1C). A similar observation was made when collagen was used as a proaggregatory stimulus (n=6, data not shown). Consistently, EP4 receptor protein was detectable on platelets in flow cytometry as revealed by a polyclonal anti-EP4 antibody that gave considerably higher staining than the respective isotype-matched control antibody (Figure 1D).
Figure 1. EP4 receptors expressed by human platelets inhibit platelet aggregation. A, Original tracing showing that the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (3 to 300 nmol/L) inhibited platelet aggregation, as induced by ADP. B, ONO AE1-329 (3 nmol/L to 3 μmol/L) inhibited platelet aggregation as induced by ADP or collagen. The concentrations of ADP (2.5 to 20 μmol/L) and collagen (1.25 to 10 μg/mL) were adjusted to give submaximal aggregation. C, Pretreatment of platelets with the EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (300 nmol/L) unmasked the facilitating effect of PGE2 (30 and 300 nmol/L) on ADP-induced aggregation. The concentration of ADP (1 to 2.5 μmol/L) was selected to give 25% to 50% aggregation in the absence of PGE2. Data were expressed as percentage of the control response to ADP or collagen and are shown as the mean±SEM of 4 to 12 experiments. *P<0.05 versus pretreatment with vehicle. D, Expression of EP4 receptors on platelets was determined by indirect flow cytometry. The graph is representative of 4 stainings with different donors. Ab indicates antibody.
In further experiments, we addressed the possibility that the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 was mediated by alternative inhibitory PG receptors such as the EP2 receptor, I-prostanoid receptor (IP), or D-prostanoid receptor (DP). Butaprost, a selective EP2 agonist at concentrations up to 300 nmol/L, did not mimic the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist, as it left the ADP-induced aggregation unaltered (Figure 2A). Pretreatment of the samples with the IP antagonist CAY10441 (300 nmol/L) or the DP antagonist BWA868c (1 μmol/L) did not attenuate the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (Figure 2B). To exclude the possibility that the inhibitory effect of ONO AE1-329 was due to modulation of the thromboxane receptor (TP) or prostanoid release from platelets, samples were pretreated with acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L) or with the TP antagonist SQ29548 (1 μmol/L). Although both compounds per se moderately reduced the ADP-induced aggregation by 20% to 30% (P<0.05, n=6, data not shown), they did not influence the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (Figure 2C). Moreover, the EP4 antagonists ONO AE3-208 (300 nmol/L and 1 μmol/L) and GW627368x (10 μmol/L) both reversed the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist (Figure 2D). Conversely, ONO AE3-208 and GW627368x had no effect on the iloprost-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation (Figure 2E). The proaggregatory effect of EP3 stimulation was confirmed by the EP3 agonist sulprostone, which potently enhanced the ADP-induced aggregation (Figure 2A), reminiscent of the proaggregatory effect of PGE2 in the presence of the EP4 antagonist shown in Figure 1C.
Figure 2. IP, DP, TP, and cyclooxygenase products are not involved in the inhibitory effect of ONO AE1-329 on human platelet aggregation. A, The EP3 agonist sulprostone (3 to 300 nmol/L) augmented the ADP-induced aggregation, whereas the EP2 agonist butaprost (3 to 100 nmol/L) had no effect on it. The concentration of ADP (1 to 2.5 μmol/L) was selected to give 25% to 50% aggregation in the absence of a prostanoid. B, Pretreatment of platelets with the IP antagonist CAY10441 (300 nmol/L) or the DP antagonist BWA868c (1 μmol/L) did not reverse the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (3 to 300 nmol/L) on ADP-induced aggregation. The concentration of ADP (2.5 to 20 μmol/L) was adjusted to give submaximal aggregation. C, Pretreatment of platelets with the TP antagonist SQ29548 (1 μmol/L) or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, 1 mmol/L) did not affect the inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation by the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (3 to 300 nmol/L). D, Pretreatment of platelets with the EP4 antagonists ONO AE3-208 (300 nmol/L or 1 μmol/L) or GW627368x (10 μmol/L) prevented the inhibitory effect of ONO AE1-329 (3 to 300 nmol/L) on ADP-induced aggregation. E, Pretreatment of platelets with the IP antagonist CAY10441 (300 nmol/L) prevented the inhibitory effect of the IP agonist iloprost (0.03 to 0.3 nmol/L) on ADP-induced aggregation, whereas the EP4 antagonists ONO AE3-208 and GW627368x had no effect. Data were expressed as percentage of the control response to ADP and are shown as the mean±SEM of 6 to 18 experiments. *P<0.05 versus pretreatment with vehicle.
Next, we investigated whether platelets from rats, guinea pigs, and mice responded to activation of EP4 receptors. In fact, flow cytometric immunostaining showed that platelets from all 3 species expressed EP4 receptors (Supplemental Figure I). Unexpectedly, the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 at a concentration of 300 nmol/L was unable to inhibit ADP-induced aggregation in any of the 3 species, although iloprost was effective (Supplemental Figure II). Collectively, these data suggested that, in contrast to rodents, EP4 receptors on human platelets play a prominent antiaggregatory role.
Cellular Mechanisms Linked to EP4-Mediated Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation
Because platelet aggregation essentially depends on increased free intracellular Ca2+ levels, we investigated how EP4 receptors modulate Ca2+ responses to ADP using a flow cytometric Ca2+ flux assay. ADP was highly efficient to stimulate Ca2+ flux in platelets in a concentration-dependent manner (10 to 1000 nmol/L). Whereas iloprost caused almost complete inhibition, ONO AE1-329 significantly attenuated this response (Figure 3A). Similarly, PGE2 in the concentration range of 0.1 and 10 μmol/L reduced the Ca2+ responses to 100 nmol/L ADP. This effect of PGE2 was largely prevented in the presence of the EP4 antagonist GW627368x (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. EP4 stimulation attenuates Ca2+ mobilization, the upregulation of P-selectin (CD62P), and activation of GPIIb/IIIa in washed human platelets. A, Ca2+ flux induced by ADP (10 to 1000 nmol/L) was significantly attenuated by ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) and iloprost (0.3 nmol/L). Ca2+ responses were detected by flow cytometry as changes in fluorescence of the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fluo-3 by flow cytometry and are presented as percentage of baseline fluorescence. B, Pretreatment of platelets with the EP4 antagonist GW627368x (10 μmol/L) prevented the PGE2-induced (0.01 to 10 μmol/L) attenuation of platelet Ca2+ flux, as elicited by 100 nmol/L ADP. C and D, ADP (3 μmol/L) increased the surface expression of CD62P and the activation of GPIIb/IIIa in platelets. For CD62P expression, platelets were primed with cytochalasin B (5 μg/mL). Activation of GPIIb/IIIa was detected using the conformation-sensitive antibody PAC-1. Iloprost (3 nmol/L), PGE2 (10 μmol/L), and the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) caused significant inhibition of CD62P upregulation and GPIIb/IIIa activation. Pretreatment with the TP antagonist SQ29548 (1 μmol/L) did not abrogate the effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L). E and F, In acetylsalicylic acid–treated platelets, iloprost (3 nmol/L), PGE2 (10 μmol/L), and the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) still reduced the upregulation of CD62P and GPIIb/IIIa activation. The EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (1 and 10 μmol/L) abrogated the effect of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) and PGE2 (10 μmol/L). Data were expressed as percentage of the control response to ADP and are shown as the mean±SEM of 6 to 12 experiments. *P<0.05 versus pretreatment with vehicle; #P<0.05 versus the respective agonist.
Because elevation of intracellular free Ca2+ levels is crucial for upregulation of P-selectin and activation of GPIIb/IIIa, we further investigated the effects of EP4 activation on these responses. Stimulation of platelets with ADP (3 μmol/L) increased the surface expression of CD62P 8-fold as detected by an anti-CD62P antibody directly conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Figure 3C). The activation of GPIIb/IIIa was detected with the use of a conformation-dependent antibody, PAC-1 (Figure 3D). ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) effectively prevented the CD62P upregulation and the activation of GPIIb/IIIa. In contrast, relatively high concentrations of PGE2 (10 μmol/L) were required to achieve similar inhibition. The TP antagonist SQ29548 (100 nmol/L) by itself had no effect on ADP-induced CD62P upregulation and activation of GPIIb/IIIa (data not shown) and also did not prevent the inhibition obtained by ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L; Figure 3C and 3D). The inhibitory effects of PGE2 (10 μmol/L) and the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) were also seen in platelets treated with acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L; Figure 3E and 3F). To further substantiate the role of EP4 receptors, platelets were pretreated with the EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (1 or 10 μmol/L), which abolished the inhibitory effects of the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 and PGE2 (Figure 3E and 3F). The total amount GPIIb/IIIa was not changed by any of these treatments as determined using an anti-CD41 antibody (Supplemental Figure III). These observations suggest that activation of EP4 receptors attenuates platelet aggregation by the control of Ca2+ mobilization and the ensuing upregulation of P-selectin and activation of GPIIb/IIIa.
Effect of EP4 Activation on Platelet Adhesion and In Vitro Thrombus Formation
Because we observed that stimulation of EP4 receptors downregulates the expression of adhesion molecules and prevents activation of the fibrinogen receptor GPIIb/IIIa, we investigated the adhesion of platelets to fibrinogen under flow conditions. Platelet-rich plasma was perfused under shear stress over fibrinogen-coated surfaces, and platelet adhesion was recorded by microscopy. Addition of 10 μmol/L ADP to the samples rapidly triggered the adhesion of platelets to fibrinogen within 3 minutes (Figure 4A). In samples treated with ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L), this was largely prevented, and only individual small aggregates were observed. Iloprost (3 nmol/L) likewise prevented platelet adhesion. Computerized image analysis of the photographs taken after 3 minutes of platelet perfusion confirmed that the EP4 agonist reduced the platelet-covered area by 90% (Figure 4B).
Figure 4. The EP4 agonist abrogates platelet adhesion to fibrinogen. Platelet-rich plasma was perfused over fibrinogen-coated channels, and platelet adhesion was recorded by microscopy. The images were taken 3 minutes after the start of the perfusion and are representative of 3 different experiments. A, Platelets activated by 10 μmol/L ADP readily adhered to fibrinogen and formed large aggregates. Samples treated with ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) showed only individual small aggregates. Iloprost (3 nmol/L) almost completely prevented platelet adhesion. B, Platelet-covered area was calculated by computerized image analysis and is shown in arbitrary units, mean±SEM of 3 experiments. *P<0.05 versus vehicle.
Finally, we assessed whether EP4 activation also prevented thrombogenesis. To this end, whole blood was perfused through collagen-coated channels, and thrombus formation was recorded by fluorescence microscopy. Adhesion of platelets to collagen was observed after 1 minute, subsequently leading to pronounced thrombus formation as shown in Figure 5 at 3 minutes. In samples pretreated with the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L) or PGE2 (10 μmol/L), thrombus formation was largely prevented, and only small aggregates were observed (Figure 5A). The effects of the EP4 agonist and PGE2 were reversed by the EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (1 μmol/L and 10 μmol/L). As expected, thrombus formation was likewise attenuated by acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L), and its combination with the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 almost completely abolished the thrombus formation (Figure 5A). Computerized image analysis revealed that the EP4 agonist reduced the area of the thrombi by 79%, whereas the combination of ONO AE1-329 plus acetylsalicylic acid reduced it by 93% (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. EP4 stimulation prevents in vitro thrombus formation. Whole blood was incubated with the fluorescence dye 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide, perfused over collagen-coated channels and thrombus formation was recorded by fluorescence microscopy. The images were taken 3 minutes after the start of the perfusion and are representative of 3 different experiments. A, Vehicle-treated samples showed pronounced and rapid thrombogenesis over collagen. Treatment with PGE2 (10 μmol/L), ONO AE1-329 (300 nmol/L), or acetylsalicylic acid (1 mmol/L) markedly reduced the formation of thrombi. The EP4 antagonist ONO AE3-208 (1 and 10 μmol/L) reversed the inhibitory effects of PGE2 and ONO AE1-329. The antithrombogenic effect of acetylsalicylic acid was further accentuated by ONO AE1-329. B, Thrombus-covered area was calculated by computerized image analysis and is shown in arbitrary units, mean±SEM of 3 experiments. *P<0.05 versus pretreatment with vehicle; #P<0.05 as indicated.
Discussion
In the present study, we suggest a novel path for antithrombotic intervention, as we show that EP4 receptors expressed on human platelets confer inhibitory signals. On the one hand, we observed that EP4 receptors play an important role in the complex action of PGE2 in the regulation of platelet function, because an EP4 antagonist accentuated the PGE2-induced enhancement of agonist-induced platelet aggregation. On the other hand, selective stimulation of EP4 receptors using an EP4 agonist potently inhibited platelet aggregation in response to ADP or collagen. Furthermore, we could decipher the cellular mechanisms linked to EP4-mediated platelet inhibition: ligation of EP4 receptors apparently attenuates Ca2+ mobilization in platelets and curbs the agonist-induced upregulation of P-selectin and the dimerization/activation of the fibrinogen receptor GPIIb/IIIa. On a functional level, these changes lead to a reduced capacity of platelets to adhere to surfaces and to form thrombi under flow conditions.
PGE2 has long been known to attenuate platelet aggregation at high concentrations, ie, in the micromolar range; at lower concentrations, however, PGE2 is promoting aggregatory responses induced by platelet activators, such as ADP or collagen.6,7,9,10,32 Therefore, the primary action of PGE2 was suggested to be proaggregatory. The EP3 receptor was subsequently characterized as the receptor that mediates the PGE2-induced augmentation of platelet aggregation, and EP3 receptor antagonists are currently under consideration as potential novel antithrombotic treatment.19 This notion was also confirmed in our study, because the EP3 agonist sulprostone potently enhanced the ADP-induced platelet aggregation with an estimated EC50 below 3 nmol/L. How the inhibitory role of EP4 receptors has until now gone unnoticed might be explained by studies in PGE2 receptor and IP knockout mice, suggesting that it is the IP rather than EP2 or EP4 receptors that underlie the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on murine platelet aggregation.24,33
In the current study, we show for the first time that human platelets express EP4 receptors, which is in line with a previous report of EP4 mRNA detected in platelets.15 Led by this observation, we tested an EP4 selective agonist, ONO AE1-329, in assays of platelet aggregation. In fact, ONO AE1-329 potently attenuated agonist-induced platelet aggregation with apparent IC50 values of 3 and 0.1 nmol/L against the proaggregatory stimuli ADP and collagen, respectively. Conversely, 2 chemically distinct EP4 antagonists, GW627368x and ONO AE3-208, abrogated the inhibitory effect of ONO AE1-329 on platelet aggregation. Moreover, the specific IP and DP antagonists, CAY10441 and BWA868c, showed no tendency to reverse the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist, although they prevented the inhibitory effects of the IP agonist iloprost (this study) and the DP agonist PGD2.27 Similarly, the TP antagonist SQ29548 or acetylsalicylic acid had no effect on the EP4-mediated inhibition of platelet aggregation. Therefore, these data unequivocally demonstrate that selective activation of EP4 receptors on platelets restrains platelet aggregation in humans without involving other inhibitory prostanoid receptors or modulating thromboxane A2 release or TP activity.
ONO AE1-329 had no inhibitory effect on platelets from rats, guinea pigs, and mice, although iloprost was effective in all 3 species (cf. supplemental data). One possible explanation might be the expression levels of EP4, which appeared to be lower in rodent platelets compared with human platelets. Therefore, these observations precluded further experimentation in animal models of thrombogenesis. Instead, we used an in vitro model of platelet adhesion and thrombus formation, which allows quantification of platelet function under flow conditions.34,35 In fact, adhesion of platelets and subsequent thrombogenesis were effectively prevented by the EP4 agonist.
Agonist-induced Ca2+ flux was also attenuated by the EP4 agonist and also by PGE2, and this effect was largely prevented by the EP4 antagonist GW627368x. However, the effect of EP4 receptor activation on Ca2+ flux was considerably smaller compared with the pronounced inhibition of platelet aggregation, suggesting that additional mechanisms are likely to be in place. P-selectin (CD62P) plays an important role in the interaction of platelets with leukocytes and endothelial cells and is upregulated in activated platelets. The ultimate step in platelet aggregation is activation of GPIIb/IIIa, which then binds fibrinogen with high avidity and thus enables thrombus formation. Most substantially, the EP4 agonist ONO AE1-329 and, to a lesser extent, PGE2 were able to prevent the agonist-induced upregulation of P-selectin and activation of GPIIb/IIIa. Again, the EP4 antagonist completely abolished the inhibitory effect of the EP4 agonist on upregulation of P-selectin and GPIIb/IIIa activation, whereas the TP antagonist and acetylsalicylic acid had no effect. These observations were in good agreement with reduced platelet adhesion to fibrinogen, the ligand of GPIIb/IIIa. Finally, flow chamber experiments using perfusions of human whole blood over collagen confirmed that the inhibitory effects of ONO AE1-329 on platelet function translated to potent antithrombogenic effects. In this respect, the EP4 agonist matched the effect of acetylsalicylic acid, and in combination even enhanced the inhibitory effect of that clinically relevant antiplatelet drug.
EP4 receptors have been shown to couple to Gs proteins and adenylyl cyclase–mediated cAMP production.14 The antiaggregatory effects of PGI2 and PGD2 have been demonstrated to rely on cAMP and subsequent attenuation of Ca2+ mobilization,36–39 suggesting that cAMP is an important negative regulator of platelet function. Unexpectedly, we observed that pretreatment with the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 (100 μmol/L) was unable to prevent the inhibitory effect of ONO AE1-329 on platelet aggregation (data not shown, n=6). The disparity of IP and EP4 signaling with respect to the adenylyl cyclase/cAMP pathways might thus account for the higher potency of iloprost as platelet inhibitor. In contrast, the nonselective protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor chelerythrine (100 μmol/L) abolished the EP4-mediated effects on platelets (data not shown, n=6), which was in line with PKC being linked to EP4 signaling in HL-60 cells and eosinophils.40,41 PKC is a major regulator of platelet granule secretion, integrin activation, and aggregation, whereby individual members of the PKC family play distinct, sometimes opposing roles.42 For instance, PKC-α, a classic isoform, is an essential positive regulator of granule secretion and thrombus formation,43 whereas the novel isoform PKC-δ negatively regulates filopodia formation and thromboxane A2 release and thus reduces platelet aggregation and thrombus formation.44,45 Therefore, the involvement of PKC isoforms in EP4 signaling of platelets remains a substantial field for further investigation.
In conclusion, our data suggest that EP4 receptors might play an important role in the control of hemostasis by mediating the inhibitory effect of PGE2, thereby balancing out the proaggregatory effect of EP3 receptors. When activated separately using selective agonists, EP4 receptors afford potent inhibition of platelet function with respect to platelet adhesion, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Hence, EP4 agonists might constitute a novel class of antithrombotic agents and might be clinically useful in cases where acetylsalicylic acid or ADP antagonists are not warranted or are insufficient.
*Original research submitted in response to ATVB’s call for papers.
Received on: May 12, 2010; final version accepted on: October 11, 2010.
Sources of Funding
Dr Philipose and Dr Konya were funded by the PhD Program Molecular Medicine of the Medical University of Graz. This work was supported by the Austrian National Bank (Grants 11967 and 13487), the Austrian Science Fund FWF (Grants P19424-B05, P22521-B18, and P21004-B02), and the Franz Lanyar Foundation (Grants 315, 316, and 343).
Disclosures
None.
Footnotes
References
- 1 Bishop-Bailey D, Pepper JR, Haddad EB, Newton R, Larkin SW, Mitchell JA. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in human saphenous vein and internal mammary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 1644–1648.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 2 Brock TG, McNish RW, Peters-Golden M. Arachidonic acid is preferentially metabolized by cyclooxygenase-2 to prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 11660–11666.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 3 Matsumoto H, Naraba H, Murakami M, Kudo I, Yamaki K, Ueno A, Oh-ishi S. Concordant induction of prostaglandin E2 synthase with cyclooxygenase-2 leads to preferred production of prostaglandin E2 over thromboxane and prostaglandin D2 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 230: 110–114.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 4 Thomas DW, Mannon RB, Mannon PJ, Latour A, Oliver JA, Hoffman M, Smithies O, Koller BH, Coffman TM. Coagulation defects and altered hemodynamic responses in mice lacking receptors for thromboxane A2. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1994–2001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 5 Vila L. Cyclooxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase pathways in the vessel wall: role in atherosclerosis. Med Res Rev. 2004; 24: 399–424.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 6 Shio H, Ramwell PW, Jessup SJ. Prostaglandin E2: effects on aggregation, shape change and cyclic AMP of rat platelets. Prostaglandins. 1972; 1: 29–36.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 7 Salzman EW, Kensler PC, Levine L. Cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate in human blood platelets: IV: regulatory role of cyclic AMP in platelet function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1972; 201: 61–71.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 8 Thierauch KH, Prior G. Modulation of platelet activation by prostaglandin E2 mimics. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukot Res. 1991; 21A: 383–386.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 9 Vezza R, Roberti R, Nenci GG, Gresele P. Prostaglandin E2 potentiates platelet aggregation by priming protein kinase C. Blood. 1993; 82: 2704–2713.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 10 Weiss HJ, Willis AL, Kuhn D, Brand H. Prostaglandin E2 potentiation of platelet aggregation induced by LASS endoperoxide: absent in storage pool disease, normal after aspirin ingestion. Br J Haematol. 1976; 32: 257–272.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 11 Gresele P, Blockmans D, Deckmyn H, Vermylen J. Adenylate cyclase activation determines the effect of thromboxane synthase inhibitors on platelet aggregation in vitro. Comparison of platelets from responders and nonresponders. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988; 246: 301–307.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 12 Sugimoto Y, Narumiya S. Prostaglandin E receptors. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 11613–11617.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 13 Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F. Prostanoid receptors: structures, properties, and functions. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79: 1193–1226.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 14 Breyer RM, Bagdassarian CK, Myers SA, Breyer MD. Prostanoid receptors: subtypes and signaling. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001; 41: 661–690.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 15 Paul BZ, Ashby B, Sheth SB. Distribution of prostaglandin IP and EP receptor subtypes and isoforms in platelets and human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells. Br J Haematol. 1998; 102: 1204–1211.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 16 Matthews JS, Jones RL. Potentiation of aggregation and inhibition of adenylate cyclase in human platelets by prostaglandin E analogues. Br J Pharmacol. 1993; 108: 363–369.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 17 Mao GF, Jin JG, Bastepe M, Ortiz-Vega S, Ashby B. Prostaglandin E2 both stimulates and inhibits adenyl cyclase on platelets: comparison of effects on cloned EP4 and EP3 prostaglandin receptor subtypes. Prostaglandins. 1996; 52: 175–185.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 18 Ma H, Hara A, Xiao CY, Okada Y, Takahata O, Nakaya K, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S, Ushikubi F. Increased bleeding tendency and decreased susceptibility to thromboembolism in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP(3). Circulation. 2001; 104: 1176–1180.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 19 Heptinstall S, Espinosa DI, Manolopoulos P, Glenn JR, White AE, Johnson A, Dovlatova N, Fox SC, May JA, Hermann D, Magnusson O, Stefansson K, Hartman D, Gurney M. DG-041 inhibits the EP3 prostanoid receptor: a new target for inhibition of platelet function in atherothrombotic disease. Platelets. 2008; 19: 605–613.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 20 Gross S, Tilly P, Hentsch D, Vonesch JL, Fabre JE. Vascular wall-produced prostaglandin E2 exacerbates arterial thrombosis and atherothrombosis through platelet EP3 receptors. J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 311–320.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 21 Philipose S, Ofner M, Heinemann A, Schuligoi R. Prostaglandin E2 acts via the EP4 receptor to inhibit platelet aggregation [Abstract]. BMC Pharmacol. 2009; 9 (suppl 2): A8.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 22 Smith JP, Haddad EV, Downey JD, Breyer RM, Boutaud O. PGE2 decreases reactivity of human platelets by activating EP2 and EP4. Thromb Res. 2010; 126: e23–e29.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 23 Iyu D, Glenn JR, White AE, Johnson AJ, Fox SC, Heptinstall S. The role of prostanoid receptors in mediating the effects of PGE(2) on human platelet function. Platelets. 2010; 21: 329–342.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 24 Kuriyama S, Kashiwagi H, Yuhki KI, Kojima F, Yamada T, Fujino T, Hara A, Takayama K, Maruyama T, Yoshida A, Narumiya S, Ushikubi F. Selective activation of the prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP2 or EP4 leads to inhibition of platelet aggregation. Thromb Haemost. 2010; 104: 796–803.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 25 Bohm E, Sturm GJ, Weiglhofer I, Sandig H, Shichijo M, McNamee A, Pease JE, Kollroser M, Peskar BA, Heinemann A. 11-Dehydro-thromboxane B2, a stable thromboxane metabolite, is a full agonist of chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on TH2 cells (CRTH2) in human eosinophils and basophils. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 7663–7670.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 26 Schuligoi R, Schmidt R, Geisslinger G, Kollroser M, Peskar BA, Heinemann A. PGD2 metabolism in plasma: kinetics and relationship with bioactivity on DP1 and CRTH2 receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007; 74: 107–117.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 27 Schuligoi R, Sedej M, Waldhoer M, Vukoja A, Sturm EM, Lippe IT, Peskar BA, Heinemann A. Prostaglandin H2 induces the migration of human eosinophils through the chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule of Th2 cells, CRTH2. J Leukoc Biol. 2009; 85: 136–145.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 28 Heinemann A, Ofner M, Amann R, Peskar BA. A novel assay to measure the calcium flux in human basophils: effects of chemokines and nerve growth factor. Pharmacology. 2003; 67: 49–54.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 29 Inwald DP, McDowall A, Peters MJ, Callard RE, Klein NJ. CD40 is constitutively expressed on platelets and provides a novel mechanism for platelet activation. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1041–1048.LinkGoogle Scholar
- 30 Natarajan P, May JA, Sanderson HM, Zabe M, Spangenberg P, Heptinstall S. Effects of cytochalasin H, a potent inhibitor of cytoskeletal reorganisation, on platelet function. Platelets. 2000; 11: 467–476.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 31 Rossi F, Rossi E, Pareti FI, Colli S, Tremoli E, Gallo L. In vitro measurement of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade by abciximab: interindividual variation and increased platelet secretion. Haematologica. 2001; 86: 192–198.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 32 Gray SJ, Heptinstall S. The effects of PGE2 and CL 115,347, an antihypertensive PGE2 analogue, on human blood platelet behaviour and vascular contractility. Eur J Pharmacol. 1985; 114: 129–137.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 33 Fabre JE, Nguyen M, Athirakul K, Coggins K, McNeish JD, Austin S, Parise LK, FitzGerald GA, Coffman TM, Koller BH. Activation of the murine EP3 receptor for PGE2 inhibits cAMP production and promotes platelet aggregation. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 603–610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 34 Nissinen L, Pentikainen OT, Jouppila A, Kapyla J, Ojala M, Nieminen J, Lipsanen A, Lappalainen H, Eckes B, Johnson MS, Lassila R, Marjamaki A, Heino J. A small-molecule inhibitor of integrin α2β1 introduces a new strategy for antithrombotic therapy. Thromb Haemost. 2010; 103: 387–397.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 35 Okorie UM, Diamond SL. Matrix protein microarrays for spatially and compositionally controlled microspot thrombosis under laminar flow. Biophys J. 2006; 91: 3474–3481.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 36 Watson SP, McConnell RT, Lapetina EG. The rapid formation of inositol phosphates in human platelets by thrombin is inhibited by prostacyclin. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259: 13199–13203.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 37 Cavallini L, Coassin M, Borean A, Alexandre A. Prostacyclin and sodium nitroprusside inhibit the activity of the platelet inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and promote its phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271: 5545–5551.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 38 Ito S, Narumiya S, Hayaishi O. Prostaglandin D2: a biochemical perspective. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1989; 37: 219–234.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 39 Zavoico GB, Feinstein MB. Cytoplasmic Ca2+ in platelets is controlled by cyclic AMP: antagonism between stimulators and inhibitors of adenylate cyclase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984; 120: 579–585.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 40 Reno F, Cannas M. Effect of prostaglandin E2 on PMA-induced macrophage differentiation. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005; 75: 13–24.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 41 Sturm EM, Schratl P, Schuligoi R, Konya V, Sturm GJ, Lippe IT, Peskar BA, Heinemann A. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits eosinophil trafficking through E-prostanoid 2 receptors. J Immunol. 2008; 181: 7273–7283.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 42 Harper MT, Poole AW. Diverse functions of protein kinase C isoforms in platelet activation and thrombus formation. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8: 454–462.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 43 Konopatskaya O, Gilio K, Harper MT, Zhao Y, Cosemans JM, Karim ZA, Whiteheart SW, Molkentin JD, Verkade P, Watson SP, Heemskerk JW, Poole AW. PKCα regulates platelet granule secretion and thrombus formation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009; 119: 399–407.MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 44 Pula G, Schuh K, Nakayama K, Nakayama KI, Walter U, Poole AW. PKCδ regulates collagen-induced platelet aggregation through inhibition of VASP-mediated filopodia formation. Blood. 2006; 108: 4035–4044.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
- 45 Chari R, Getz T, Nagy B Jr, Bhavaraju K, Mao Y, Bynagari YS, Murugappan S, Nakayama K, Kunapuli SP. Protein kinase Cδ differentially regulates platelet functional responses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 699–705.LinkGoogle Scholar


