High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Phospholipid Content and Cholesterol Efflux Capacity Are Reduced in Patients With Very High HDL Cholesterol and Coronary Disease
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Abstract
Objective—
Plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are strongly inversely associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), and high HDL-C is generally associated with reduced risk of CAD. Extremely high HDL-C with CAD is an unusual phenotype, and we hypothesized that the HDL in such individuals may have an altered composition and reduced function when compared with controls with similarly high HDL-C and no CAD.
Approach and Results—
Fifty-five subjects with very high HDL-C (mean, 86 mg/dL) and onset of CAD at the age of ≈60 years with no known risk factors for CAD (cases) were identified through systematic recruitment. A total of 120 control subjects without CAD, matched for race, sex, and HDL-C level (controls), were identified. In all subjects, HDL composition was analyzed and HDL cholesterol efflux capacity was assessed. HDL phospholipid composition was significantly lower in cases (92±37 mg/dL) than in controls (109±43 mg/dL; P=0.0095). HDL cholesterol efflux capacity was significantly lower in cases (1.96±0.39) than in controls (2.11±0.43; P=0.04).
Conclusions—
In people with very high HDL-C, reduced HDL phospholipid content and cholesterol efflux capacity are associated with the paradoxical development of CAD.
Introduction
Plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are strongly inversely correlated with the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD).1 It has been estimated that for each milligrams per deciliter increase in HDL-C, the risk of cardiovascular events is decreased by 2% to 3%.2 Consequently, levels of HDL-C are factored into many cardiovascular risk assessments, and HDL has been intensively pursued as a secondary goal for risk reduction after low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering. The belief that levels of HDL-C have a causal relationship to the prevention of CAD has been referred to as the HDL cholesterol hypothesis.3
There have been recent challenges to the HDL-C hypothesis. Common variations associated with small changes in HDL levels are not associated with protection from coronary disease, in contrast to variants that affect LDL-C and triglycerides.4,5 Recently, several clinical trials using agents that raise HDL-C have failed to show any clinical benefit. In the dal-OUTCOMES trial of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor dalcetrapib, patients received dalcetrapib in addition to other agents that lower LDL-C. Although a significant elevation in HDL-C levels was noted in patients treated with dalcetrapib, the trial was terminated because of futility of the study.6 The HPS2-THRIVE trial was designed to assess cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with extended release niacin and laropiprant, an antiflushing agent, in addition to a statin. However, HPS2-THRIVE missed its primary end point of reducing the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularizations compared with statin therapy alone.7 These studies have fueled the debate about a causal role of HDL-C in heart disease, and whether raising HDL-C levels is a viable therapeutic strategy.
HDL has several properties that may offer protection against CAD, including its role in promoting cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport.8 Genetic and pharmacological manipulations of HDL that increase reverse cholesterol transport in animal models are generally protective against atherosclerosis.9 However, HDL-C concentration does not always reflect its functionality. For example, even after controlling for HDL-C the cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL was inversely associated with prevalent carotid and coronary atherosclerosis10 and with incident cardiovascular events.11
Extremely high HDL-C levels are generally associated with reduced risk of CAD. However, an unusual phenotype is that of very high HDL-C with development of CAD in the absence of traditional risk factors. We hypothesized that these individuals have altered composition and reduced function of their HDL that may predispose them to increased risk of CAD. We systematically recruited individuals with very high HDL both with and without CAD and compared the composition and function of HDL. We found that the HDL from high HDL-C subjects with CAD had reduced phospholipid content and reduced cholesterol efflux capacity when compared with the HDL from high HDL-C subjects without CAD.
Materials and Methods
Materials and Methods are available in the online-only Data Supplement.
Results
Clinical Characteristics and Plasma Lipids and Apolipoproteins
The clinical characteristics of the 55 cases with high HDL-C and CAD and the 120 matched controls with high HDL-C and no CAD are shown in Table 1. Mean age was 64±11 years for the cases and 69±12 years for the controls with ≈40% of the subjects being women. The mean age of onset of CAD was ≈60 years in the cases for both men and women, although this was not reliably ascertained in all subjects.
Cases | Controls | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
n | 55 | 120 | … |
Age (mean±SD), y | 64±11 | 69±12 | 0.07 |
Female, % | 36.4 | 40 | 0.65 |
Black, % | 3.6 | 6.1 | 0.95 |
BMI | 24.6±3.5 | 24.4±3.3 | 0.81 |
Mean age of onset of CAD (% reported) | 60 (44) | NA | … |
Statin users,* % | 80 | 32 | … |
BMI indicates body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; and NA, not applicable.
*
A total of 64% of cases and 79% of controls provided information on statin usage.
Plasma lipid and apolipoprotein values for the cases and controls are depicted in Table 2. There was no difference in the mean HDL-C between the cases and controls as they were matched for HDL-C level by study design. Triglyceride levels were also not different between the 2 groups. LDL-C was significantly lower in the cases than in controls (97±38 versus 125±33 mg/dL; P<0.0001), as was apoB (77±21 versus 89±19 mg/dL; P<0.001), and LDL particle number. Total plasma phospholipids were lower in cases than in controls (253±55 versus 274±52 mg/dL; P=0.017). ApoE levels were modestly lower in cases (5.0±2 versus 6.0±2 mg/dL; P=0.046). No differences were observed in apoAI, apoAII, or apoCIII levels between cases and controls. No difference was observed between cases and controls in measurements of the inflammatory marker, GlycA.
Cases | Controls | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Triglycerides | 80±34 | 85±38 | 0.34 |
Total cholesterol | 201±47 | 228±37 | 0.0003 |
Total phospholipid | 253±55 | 274±52 | 0.017 |
HDL-C | 86±21 | 86±20 | 0.97 |
LDL-C | 97±38 | 125±33 | 0.000016 |
ApoB | 77±21 | 89±19 | 0.0007 |
LDL particle number | 894±318 | 998±297 | 0.048 |
Lp(a) (min, max) | 23* (0, 221) | 14* (2, 165) | 0.1 |
ApoAI | 195±42 | 194±40 | 0.91 |
ApoAII | 43±11 | 40±15 | 0.40 |
ApoCIII | 15±5 | 13±5 | 0.89 |
ApoE | 5±2 | 6±2 | 0.046 |
GlycA | 332±65 | 319±61 | 0.26 |
Lipid and apolipoprotein parameters are mg/dL. Apo indicates apolipoprotein; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and Lp(a), lipoprotein.
*
Data reported as median.
HDL Lipids and Subclasses
A comparison of the HDL lipids and particle subclasses is shown in Table 3. HDL phospholipid (HDL-PL) concentrations were significantly lower in cases than in controls (92±37 versus 109±43 mg/dL; P=0.0095), fully accounting for the difference in total plasma phospholipids. HDL triglycerides were modestly elevated in cases as compared with controls. No differences were observed in total HDL particle number or in the number of large, medium, or small HDL particles.
Cases | Controls | P Value | P Value Adjusted Age, Sex | P Value Adjusted Age, Sex, BMI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDL phospholipid | 92±37 | 109±43 | 0.0095 | … | … |
HDL triglyceride | 13±9 | 11±4 | 0.049 | … | … |
Total HDLParticle number | 40±8 | 39±8 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.41 |
Large HDLParticle number | 12±5 | 13±4 | 0.87 | 0.56 | 0.63 |
Medium HDLParticle number | 11±6 | 11±7 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Small HDLParticle number | 17±6 | 16±7 | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.41 |
Lipid and apolipoprotein parameters are mg/dL. HDL particle number is reported in µmol/L. BMI indicates body mass index; and HDL, high-density lipoprotein.
HDL Cholesterol Efflux Capacity, Cholesterol Esterification Rate, and Phospholipid Transfer Protein Activity
The capacity of HDL to promote cholesterol efflux from J774 macrophages in the presence and absence of cAMP is shown in Table 4. After adjusting for age, sex, and BMI, total HDL cholesterol efflux capacity was significantly lower in cases than in controls (P=0.03). The ratio of cholesterol efflux/HDL-C was also significantly lower in cases (P=0.006). Furthermore, cAMP-inducible cholesterol efflux capacity was significantly lower in cases (P=0.025). HDL-PL was a significant predictor of total cholesterol efflux capacity (P=0.009; slope 0.0025; R2 0.06). No differences were observed between cases and controls in cholesterol esterification rate or phospholipid transfer protein activity as shown in Table 4.
Cases | Controls | P Value | P Value Adjusted Age, Sex | P Value Adjusted Age, Sex, and BMI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total efflux | 1.96±0.39 | 2.11±0.43 | 0.040 | 0.047 | 0.03 |
Total efflux/HDL-C | 0.023±0.005 | 0.025±0.006 | 0.029 | 0.009 | 0.006 |
cAMP-inducible efflux | 0.60±0.24 | 0.71±0.32 | 0.033 | 0.40 | 0.025 |
Cholesterol esterification rate | 153±55 | 169±56 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
PLTP activity | 0.49±0.18 | 0.51±0.20 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
Efflux activity is a unitless measure because of normalization, cholesterol esterification rate is given in nmol esterified/h per milliliter. PLTP activity is given in nmol/mL per minute. BMI indicates body mass index; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and PLTP, phospholipid transfer protein.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated a paradoxical phenotype, extremely high HDL-C associated with CAD. We hypothesized that individuals with this phenotype have altered HDL composition and function that put them at greater risk for CAD in the setting of high HDL-C. We found that individuals with very high HDL-C and CAD have reduced levels of HDL phospholipids and reduced HDL cholesterol efflux capacity. These findings add to the growing body of data linking HDL composition and function to clinical cardiovascular disease as distinct from HDL-C concentrations.
Cholesterol efflux is the first step of the reverse cholesterol pathway that can be assessed ex vivo by a method first developed by Rothblat and colleagues.12 Khera et al10 demonstrated that HDL cholesterol efflux capacity was inversely associated with prevalent carotid and coronary atherosclerosis even after adjusting for HDL-C, a finding confirmed by Li et al.13 Recently, Rohatgi et al11 showed that HDL efflux capacity was inversely associated with incident cardiovascular events after adjusting for HDL-C. Similarly, Hafiane et al14 and Shao et al15 have demonstrated impaired cholesterol efflux capacity in acute coronary syndrome. In contrast, Li et al13 reported a positive association of cholesterol efflux capacity with incident cardiovascular events in an angiographic cohort. Thus, there remain questions about the relationship of efflux capacity to cardiovascular disease.
The HDL from subjects with high HDL-C and CAD was reduced in phospholipid content. An inverse relationship has been noted between HDL-PL and the CAD.16 Furthermore, HDL-PL composition has been positively associated with cholesterol efflux capacity.17–21 In our study, HDL-PL was a significant predictor of total cholesterol efflux capacity. Taken together, the reduction in HDL-PL levels may play a causative role in the reduced cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL. The reduced HDL-PL was not associated with a difference in HDL subfraction particle numbers or size. A more thorough lipidomic analysis of the HDL particles is of interest but outside the scope of this study.
Lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase hydrolyzes HDL phospholipids and could influence HDL-PL content as well as potentially cholesterol efflux capacity. We measured the cholesterol esterification rate as an assay of endogenous lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase that is also influenced by the endogenous lipoproteins, but found no evidence of a difference between cases and controls. Prior studies have demonstrated an inverse association between phospholipid transfer protein activity and cholesterol efflux capacity.22 We measured phospholipid transfer protein activity and found no significant differences between the 2 groups. One limitation inherent in the phospholipid transfer protein activity assay is that it measures transfer between synthetic donor and acceptor particles, rather than between native lipoproteins where lipid and protein composition may influence activity. It is possible that increased phospholipase activity (ie, hepatic and endothelial lipase) may underlie the lower phospholipid content in the HDL of these patients, but measurement of these lipases requires postheparin plasma, which was not available.
A limitation of this study is incomplete data on medical history (such as date of onset of CAD) and lack of prospective data. To minimize this problem, we selected controls that were either the same age or older than the cases. Furthermore, prior studies have demonstrated that CAD can reduce cholesterol efflux capacity.14,15 Another limitation in our study is the assessment of only one of the major functions of HDL. HDL is a heterogeneous particle that has additional antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions, as well as unknown differences in lipidomic and proteomic compositions between the cases and controls, which when all considered together may give a more comprehensive picture of HDL functionality.
The significant differences in LDL-C and apoB levels between the cases and controls are attributed to higher use of statins in the cases than in the controls. Of the subjects who provided information on statin usage, 80% of the cases and 32% of controls reported being on statins. Recent studies have shown conflicting data on the effect of statins on cholesterol efflux capacity making it difficult to assess the nature of their effect on our study population.10,23–26 However, it is unlikely that statins from the polyethylene glycol precipitated supernatants would have a substantial effect on the cells during a 2-hour efflux assay. Recently, Miyamoto-Sasaki et al27 determined cholesterol efflux capacity in dyslipidemic patients before and after treatment with pitavastatin. The statin increased serum HDL-C levels, HDL-PL levels, and enhanced cholesterol efflux capacity, suggesting it is unlikely that statins decreased the HDL-PL content and efflux capacity of the cases. In fact, it is possible that the observed differences may actually have been greater if measurements were taken before statin therapy.
In conclusion, individuals with the paradoxical phenotype of very high HDL-C and CAD were found to have reduced HDL phospholipid and HDL cholesterol efflux capacity as compared with controls with very high HDL-C and no CAD.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Phyllis May and Debra Cromley for their valuable technical assistance as well as Dawn Marchadier, Megan Mucksavage, and Stephanie DerOhannessian for their help with the project and Wiliam Lagor for his suggestions on the manuscript.
Significance
The present study describes characterization of the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in individuals with a paradoxical phenotype of very high HDL cholesterol and coronary artery disease. We demonstrate that the HDL from these individuals has reduced HDL phospholipid content and reduced cholesterol efflux capacity compared with individuals with comparably high HDL cholesterol but no coronary artery disease. These data add to the growing body of data suggesting that HDL quality, not quantity, is important in influencing risk of coronary artery disease.
Footnote
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- CAD
- coronary artery disease
- HDL-C
- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- HDL-PL
- high-density lipoprotein phospholipid
- LDL-C
- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Supplemental Material
File (atvb_atvb-2015-305504d_supp1.pdf)
- Download
- 87.85 KB
References
1.
Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, Perry P, Kaptoge S, Ray KK, Thompson A, Wood AM, Lewington S, Sattar N, Packard CJ, Collins R, Thompson SG, Danesh J; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 2009;302:1993–2000. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1619.
2.
Young CE, Karas RH, Kuvin JT. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease. Cardiol Rev. 2004;12:107–119. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000097140.29929.8a.
3.
Rader DJ, Tall AR. The not-so-simple HDL story: Is it time to revise the HDL cholesterol hypothesis? Nat Med. 2012;18:1344–1346. doi: 10.1038/nm.2937.
4.
Teslovich TM, Musunuru K, Smith AV, et al. Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids. Nature. 2010;466:707–713. doi: 10.1038/nature09270.
5.
Voight BF, Peloso GM, Orho-Melander M, et al. Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a mendelian randomisation study. Lancet. 2012;380:572–580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60312-2.
6.
Robinson JG. Dalcetrapib: a review of Phase II data. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;19:795–805. doi: 10.1517/13543784.2010.488219.
7.
Group HTC. Hps2-thrive randomized placebo-controlled trial in 25 673 high-risk patients of er niacin/laropiprant: Trial design, pre-specified muscle and liver outcomes, and reasons for stopping study treatment. European heart journal. 2013;34:1279–1291
8.
Rosenson RS, Brewer HB, Chapman MJ, Fazio S, Hussain MM, Kontush A, Krauss RM, Otvos JD, Remaley AT, Schaefer EJ. HDL measures, particle heterogeneity, proposed nomenclature, and relation to atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. Clin Chem. 2011;57:392–410. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.155333.
9.
Rader DJ, Alexander ET, Weibel GL, Billheimer J, Rothblat GH. The role of reverse cholesterol transport in animals and humans and relationship to atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res. 2009;50 Suppl:S189–S194. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800088-JLR200.
10.
Khera AV, Cuchel M, de la Llera-Moya M, Rodrigues A, Burke MF, Jafri K, French BC, Phillips JA, Mucksavage ML, Wilensky RL, Mohler ER, Rothblat GH, Rader DJ. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:127–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001689.
11.
Rohatgi A, Khera A, Berry JD, Givens EG, Ayers CR, Wedin KE, Neeland IJ, Yuhanna IS, Rader DR, de Lemos JA, Shaul PW. HDL cholesterol efflux capacity and incident cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2383–2393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409065.
12.
de la Llera-Moya M, Drazul-Schrader D, Asztalos BF, Cuchel M, Rader DJ, Rothblat GH. The ability to promote efflux via abca1 determines the capacity of serum specimens with similar high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to remove cholesterol from macrophages. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2010;30:796–801
13.
Li XM, Tang WH, Mosior MK, Huang Y, Wu Y, Matter W, Gao V, Schmitt D, Didonato JA, Fisher EA, Smith JD, Hazen SL. Paradoxical association of enhanced cholesterol efflux with increased incident cardiovascular risks. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1696–1705. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301373.
14.
Hafiane A, Jabor B, Ruel I, Ling J, Genest J. High-density lipoprotein mediated cellular cholesterol efflux in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.006.
15.
Shao B, Tang C, Sinha A, Mayer PS, Davenport GD, Brot N, Oda MN, Zhao XQ, Heinecke JW. Humans with atherosclerosis have impaired ABCA1 cholesterol efflux and enhanced high-density lipoprotein oxidation by myeloperoxidase. Circ Res. 2014;114:1733–1742. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303454.
16.
Piperi C, Kalofoutis C, Papaevaggeliou D, Papapanagiotou A, Lekakis J, Kalofoutis A. The significance of serum HDL phospholipid levels in angiographically defined coronary artery disease. Clin Biochem. 2004;37:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.015.
17.
Bellanger N, Orsoni A, Julia Z, Fournier N, Frisdal E, Duchene E, Bruckert E, Carrie A, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Pirault J, Saint-Charles F, Chapman MJ, Lesnik P, Le Goff W, Guerin M. Atheroprotective reverse cholesterol transport pathway is defective in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1675–1681. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.227181.
18.
Ansell BJ, Watson KE, Fogelman AM, Navab M, Fonarow GC. High-density lipoprotein function recent advances. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1792–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.080.
19.
Ooi EM, Barrett PH, Watts GF. The extended abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism in familial hypercholesterolemia: developing a new framework for future therapies. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1811–1818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.069.
20.
Sattler KJ, Elbasan S, Keul P, Elter-Schulz M, Bode C, Gräler MH, Bröcker-Preuss M, Budde T, Erbel R, Heusch G, Levkau B. Sphingosine 1-phosphate levels in plasma and HDL are altered in coronary artery disease. Basic Res Cardiol. 2010;105:821–832. doi: 10.1007/s00395-010-0112-5.
21.
Fournier N, Paul JL, Atger V, Cogny A, Soni T, de la Llera-Moya M, Rothblat G, Moatti N. HDL phospholipid content and composition as a major factor determining cholesterol efflux capacity from Fu5AH cells to human serum. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2685–2691.
22.
Attia N, Nakbi A, Smaoui M, Chaaba R, Moulin P, Hammami S, Hamda KB, Chanussot F, Hammami M. Increased phospholipid transfer protein activity associated with the impaired cellular cholesterol efflux in type 2 diabetic subjects with coronary artery disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;213:129–137.
23.
Kralova Lesna I, Adamkova V, Pagacova L. Effect of rosuvastatin treatment on cholesterol efflux from human macrophages. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32 Suppl 2:24–28.
24.
Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S. Rosuvastatin blocks advanced glycation end products-elicited reduction of macrophage cholesterol efflux by suppressing NADPH oxidase activity via inhibition of geranylgeranylation of Rac-1. Horm Metab Res. 2011;43:619–624. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283148.
25.
Shimizu T, Miura S, Tanigawa H, Kuwano T, Zhang B, Uehara Y, Saku K. Rosuvastatin activates ATP-binding cassette transporter A1-dependent efflux ex vivo and promotes reverse cholesterol transport in macrophage cells in mice fed a high-fat diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2246–2253. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303715.
26.
Wang W, Song W, Wang Y, Chen L, Yan X. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, simvastatin and atorvastatin, downregulate ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux in human macrophages. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013;62:90–98. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3182927e7c.
27.
Miyamoto-Sasaki M, Yasuda T, Monguchi T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Toh R, Ishida T, Hirata K. Pitavastatin increases HDL particles functionally preserved with cholesterol efflux capacity and antioxidative actions in dyslipidemic patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20:708–716.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
Versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
History
Received: 20 October 2014
Accepted: 12 March 2015
Published online: 2 April 2015
Published in print: June 2015
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
Disclosures
None.
Sources of Funding
Dr Agarwala was supported by a medical student research fellowship from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. This work was also supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL111398, HL089309 (to Dr Rader), and HL077146 (to Dr Cuchel) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- High-densitylipoprotein function in various pathological conditions, The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University, 30, 3, (16-21), (2024).https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2023-30-3-16-21
- Understanding the heterogeneity and dysfunction of HDL in chronic kidney disease: insights from recent reviews, BMC Nephrology, 25, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03808-3
- High-density lipoprotein metrics during midlife and future subclinical atherosclerosis in women: the SWAN HDL study, Menopause, 31, 7, (567-574), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000002371
- Association between very high HDL-C levels and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Clinical Lipidology, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.06.002
- Sex-Specific Relationships between HDL-Cholesterol Levels and 10-Year Mortality in Individuals with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study of South Koreans, Metabolites, 13, 12, (1175), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13121175
- Coronary Artery Disease with Elevated Levels of HDL Cholesterol Is Associated with Distinct Lipid Signatures, Metabolites, 13, 6, (695), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13060695
- High-Density Lipoprotein Alterations in Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity, Metabolites, 13, 2, (253), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13020253
- Phospholipids, the Masters in the Shadows during Healing after Acute Myocardial Infarction, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, 9, (8360), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098360
- Differential Expression of Subsets of Genes Related to HDL Metabolism and Atherogenesis in the Peripheral Blood in Coronary Artery Disease, Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45, 8, (6823-6841), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45080431
- Associations of High-Density Lipoprotein Functionality with Coronary Plaque Characteristics in Diabetic Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Integrated Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis, Biomolecules, 13, 9, (1278), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13091278
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.