Skip main navigation
×

Prevalence of Microvolt T-Wave Alternans in Patients With Long QT Syndrome and Its Association With Torsade de Pointes

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003206Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2016;9

    Abstract

    Background—

    Prevalence of microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA) and the strength of its association with torsade de pointes (TdP) history have not been fully investigated in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS).

    Methods and Results—

    Twenty-four–hour continuous 12-lead ECGs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects (5 men; median age, 21.5 years) and 32 patients (13 men; median age, 13 years) with LQTS types 1 (n=18), 2 (n=4), 3 (n=4), and unidentified (n=6). Peak TWA was determined by the Modified Moving Average method. None of the healthy subjects had TWA ≥42 µV. All 8 (100%) LQTS patients with a history of TdP exhibited TWA ≥42 µV, whereas only 14 (58.3%) of the 24 LQTS patients without TdP history reached ≥42 µV (p=0.04). Thus, the 42-µV cut point provided 100% sensitivity and 41.7% specificity for an association with TdP history. In the 22 (68.8%) LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV, only 2 (median; interquartile range, 1–3) leads exhibited TWA ≥42 µV. Highest TWA levels were recorded in precordial leads (V1–V6) in 30 (93.8%) patients, most frequently in lead V2 (43.8%). A single ECG lead detected only ≤63.6% of TWA ≥42 µV episodes, whereas the combined leads V2 to V5 detected 100% of TWA ≥42 µV.

    Conclusions—

    Microvolt TWA is far more prevalent in LQTS patients than previously reported and is strongly associated with TdP history. TWA should be monitored from precordial leads in LQTS patients. The use of a limited set of ECG leads in conventional monitoring has led to underestimation of TWA and its association with TdP.

    Introduction

    WHAT IS KNOWN

    • Macroscopic T-wave alternans (TWA) is not only one of the diagnostic criteria for long QT syndrome (LQTS) but is also a marker of risk for cardiac events.

    • Previous clinical studies on the relationship between microvolt TWA and arrhythmia risk in patients with LQTS drew negative conclusions about its significance.

    WHAT THE STUDY ADDS

    • Automated monitoring of microvolt TWA with the Modified Moving Average method in 24-h continuous 12-lead ECGs identifies a greater prevalence of microvolt TWA episodes and a stronger association with history of torsade de pointes in LQTS patients than has been previously reported.

    • Microvolt TWA is narrowly distributed in the precordial leads in LQTS patients. Thus, use of a limited set of ECG leads in conventional monitoring has led to underestimation of TWA and its association with torsade de pointes.

    T-wave alternans (TWA), a beat-to-beat fluctuation in T-wave morphology and ST segment, is mechanistically linked to vulnerability to life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.1,2 Macroscopic TWA has frequently been reported, sometimes accompanied by torsade de pointes (TdP), in patients with congenital36 and acquired710 long QT syndrome (LQTS). Hence, macroscopic TWA is not only one of the diagnostic criteria for LQTS11 but is also a risk marker for cardiac events.4

    See Editorial by Davis

    Presently, microvolt-level TWA can be quantified using 24-hour continuous ECG.1,12 Ambulatory ECG recorders with 2 or 3 bipolar leads have been commonly used to monitor microvolt TWA.1 The utility of the simplified 2- or 3-lead ECG recorder to monitor TWA, however, may be limited by the regionally specific nature of the phenomenon, as in patients with acute myocardial ischemia.1316 Indeed, we previously reported that an acquired LQTS patient exhibited regionally specific macroscopic TWA preceding the onset of TdP.10 In this patient, the precordial leads were superior to the standard telemetry lead II in terms of macroscopic TWA detection. Therefore, we hypothesized that assessment by 24-hour multilead continuous ECG would provide more complete and accurate detection of microvolt TWA in LQTS patients than would ECG recorders with fewer leads.

    The goals of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of microvolt TWA in both healthy subjects and LQTS patients using 24-hour continuous 12-lead ECGs; (2) to assess the association of microvolt TWA with TdP history; and (3) to describe the distribution of peak TWA among ECG leads.

    Methods

    Study Participants

    We studied 10 healthy volunteers and 32 consecutive patients with LQTS. A cardiac channel gene screen for LQTS-causing mutations in KCNQ1 (LQT1), KCNH2 (LQT2), and SCN5A (LQT3) was performed in 27 patients at National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (Osaka, Japan). Twenty-six of the 27 patients were genotyped: LQT1 (n=18), LQT2 (n=4), and LQT3 (n=4). Unidentified LQTS (n=6) included 1 patient with non-1, non-2, non-3 LQTS, 1 patient awaiting genetic test result and 4 patients who did not agree to undergo genetic testing. All unidentified LQTS patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for LQTS (score ≥4).11 Average heart rate of 24 hours was automatically calculated. The maximum QT interval within the first minute of supine rest was taken as the index value. The QT interval was automatically measured in lead II or V5 (whichever was longer) every 15 s using MARS Holter Analysis Workstation Software Version 8 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). Bazett formula was then applied using the averaged R–R interval, which was automatically computed every 15 s. Exclusion criteria were the presence of atrial fibrillation or high-grade atrioventricular block.

    Ten healthy subjects were enrolled with the following exclusion criteria: chest symptoms, medication therapy, abnormal resting 12-lead ECG, known cardiovascular disease, sudden death in family history, history of syncope, and current participation in another clinical trial.

    The LQTS patients were enrolled between December 2012 and February 2014, and the healthy control subjects were enrolled between September and November 2015 at Gifu University Hospital and Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center (Gifu, Japan). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Gifu University Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Measurement of TWA

    All participants underwent 24-hour continuous 12-lead ECG recording (SEER 12 Ambulatory Recorder; GE Healthcare). Careful skin preparation and high-resolution electrodes (Blue Sensor L; Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) were used to minimize noise. Microvolt TWA values were calculated by the time-domain Modified Moving Average (MMA) method using MARS Holter Analysis Workstation Software version 8 (GE Healthcare). The MMA method has been described in detail.12 In brief, a stream of beats is divided into odd and even bins, and the morphology of the beats in each bin is averaged over a few beats successively to create a moving average complex. Average morphologies of both the odd and even beats are continuously updated by a weighting factor of 1/8 of the difference between the ongoing average and the new incoming beats. TWA is computed as the maximum difference in amplitude between the odd-beat and the even-beat average complexes from the J point to the end of the T wave for each 15-s beat stream. TWA values at heart rates >120 beats per minute or those with noise levels >20 μV were excluded from the analysis. The data were visually inspected and scored by 1 cardiologist who was blinded to the patient information.

    Peak TWA was determined and used for analysis of an association with TdP even if the TWA episodes lasted for <1 min, as is standard for the MMA method. This approach is in agreement with the determination of Kaufman et al17 that nonsustained TWA carries predictive value. Then, TWA values in the other 11 leads at the time of peak TWA were also measured in each LQTS patient. The lead with the peak TWA values was termed the highest lead. In LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV, the sensitivity for detecting TWA ≥42 µV was evaluated in each of the 12 leads.

    Statistical Analysis

    Statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Diagnostic performance of microvolt TWA was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and the cut point TWA value for associations with TdP history was determined via Youden’s index. Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range). Comparisons between 2 groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences between 3 groups were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis test. If the differences were significant, the post hoc Steel–Dwass test was performed for multiple comparisons. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages and were compared by Fisher’s exact test. The P values for pairwise group comparisons were adjusted for multiplicity by use of the Holm method. All significance tests were 2 sided. Results were considered statistically significant when the P value was <0.05.

    Results

    Patient Characteristics

    The clinical characteristics of the 32 LQTS patients with types 1 (LQT1, n=18), 2 (LQT2, n=4), 3 (LQT3, n=4), and unidentified (n=6) are summarized in Table 1. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 8 patients with a history of TdP (TdP group) and 24 without (non-TdP group). The clinical characteristics of the 2 groups and healthy controls are shown in Table 2. β-Blocker use rate was significantly higher in the TdP group than in the non-TdP group (87.5% versus 41.7%; P=0.04). There were no significant differences in other clinical characteristics of LQTS patients comparing TdP and non-TdP groups at the time of microvolt TWA test. TWA ≥42 µV, which was observed in none of the healthy subjects and in all 8 LQTS patients with a history of TdP, characterized 22 (68.8%) of the 32 LQTS patients studied (Table 3).

    Table 1. Patient Characteristics

    GroupTotalLQT1LQT2LQT3Unidentified LQT Type
    Patients (n)3218446
    Families (n)2715426
    Age, y13 (11–17.5)13 (11–14)11.5 (5.5–12.5)21 (7.5–35.5)61 (47–76)
    Men, n (%)13 (40.6)8 (44.4)1 (25)2 (50)2 (33.3)
    Women, n (%)19 (59.4)10 (55.6)3 (75)2 (50)4 (66.7)
    QTc interval, ms499 (472–529.5)487 (466–507)523 (509–535)512 (440.5–603.5)500 (476–542)
    Symptomatic, n (%)11 (34.4)2 (11.1)1 (25)2 (50)4 (66.7)
     TdP (n)8 (25)2 (11.1)1 (25)1 (25)4 (66.7)
     Syncope (n)11 (34.4)3 (16.7)1 (25)2 (50)5 (83.3)
    Family history, n (%)15 (46.9)8 (44.4)1 (25)4 (100)1 (16.7)
     Sudden death (n)5 (15.6)4 (22.2)0 (0)0 (0)1 (16.7)
     LQTS (n)13 (40.6)8 (44.4)1 (25)4 (100)0 (0)
    ICD, n (%)4 (12.5)1 (5.6)0 (0)1 (25)2 (33.3)
    Medication, n (%)22 (68.8)11 (61.1)4 (100)3 (75)3 (50)
     β-Blocker17 (53.1)11 (61.1)2 (50)1 (25)3 (50)
     Propranolol (dose range, 20–60 mg)7 (21.9)3 (16.7)2 (50)1 (25)1 (16.7)
     Atenolol (dose range, 25–50 mg)5 (15.6)5 (27.8)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Bisoprolol (dose range, 1.25–5 mg)4 (12.5)2 (11.1)0 (0)0 (0)2 (33.3)
     Carvedilol (dose, 25 mg)1 (3.1)1 (5.6)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Mexiletine (dose range, 30–300 mg)5 (15.6)0 (0)3 (75)2 (50)0 (0)

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range). ICD indicates implantable cardioverter defibrillator; LQTS, long QT syndrome; and TdP, torsade de pointes.

    Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Healthy Controls and LQTS Groups According to TdP History

    GroupH (n=10)T (n=8)N (n=24)P Value
    Families, n (%)7 (70)8 (100)19 (79.2)0.32*
    LQT1NA2 (25)16 (66.7)0.06
    LQT2NA1 (12.5)3 (12.5)
    LQT3NA1 (12.5)3 (12.5)
    Unidentified LQT type4 (50)2 (8.3)
    Age, y21.5 (11–28)32.5 (12–61)13 (10.5–14.5)0.12*
     Men, n (%)5 (50)3 (37.5)10 (41.7)0.84*
     Women, n (%)5 (50)5 (62.5)14 (58.3)
    QTc interval (ms)425 (409, 431)526 (463, 538.5)492.5 (472, 517.5)<0.001*; H<T, N
    Family history, n (%)NA2 (25)13 (54.2)0.23
     Sudden deathNA1 (12.5)4 (16.7)>0.99
     LQTSNA1 (12.5)12 (50)0.1
    β-Blocker, n (%)NA7 (87.5)10 (41.7)0.04
     Propranolol (dose range, 20–60 mg)NA3 (37.5)4 (16.7)0.33
     Atenolol (dose range, 25–50 mg)NA1 (12.5)4 (16.7)>0.99
     Bisoprolol (dose range, 1.25–5 mg)NA2 (25)2 (8.3)0.25
     Carvedilol (dose, 25 mg)NA1 (12.5)0 (0)0.25

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range). H indicates healthy control; LQTS, long QT syndrome; N, non–torsade de pointes; NA, not applicable; T, Tdp; and Tdp, torsade de pointes.

    *P values compare 3 groups.

    P values compare TdP with non-TdP patients.

    Table 3. Association of ECG Characteristics With Torsade de Pointes

    GroupH (n=10)T (n=8)N (n=24)P ValueGroup Comparison
    Average heart rate of 24-h, beats per minute78 (69–86)65.5 (58.5–73.5)70 (65.5–76.5)0.05*NA
    Notched T wave, n (%)2 (20)7 (87.5)13 (54.2)0.02*H<T (P=0.046)
    Peak TWA without TWPA, µV30 (26–37)55 (46–79)53.5 (36–73.5)<0.001*H<T (P<0.001§); H<N (P=0.001§)
    TWPA episodes, n (%)0 (0)2 (25)2 (8.3)0.19*NA
    TWA ≥42 µV, n (%)0 (0)8 (100)14 (58.3)<0.001*H<T (P<0.001); H<N (P=0.003); T>N (P=0.04)
    No. of leads with TWA ≥42 µVNA1.5 (1–2)1 (0–2)0.19NA

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range). H indicates healthy control; N, non–torsade de pointes; NA, not applicable; T, Tdp; Tdp, torsade de pointes; and TWPA, T-wave polarity alternans.

    *P values compare 3 groups.

    P values compare TdP with non-TdP patients.

    P values adjusted by the Holm method.

    §P values determined by the Steel–Dwass test.

    Peak TWA Values in Healthy Subjects and Comparison With LQTS Patients

    No healthy subjects exhibited visible macroscopic TWA or TWA ≥42 µV. Peak TWA values in healthy subjects were significantly lower than those in LQTS patients (median [interquartile range], 30 [26–37] versus 55 [39–73.5] µV; P<0.001].

    Peak TWA Values and Hourly Distribution of Peak TWA in LQTS Patients

    Peak TWA values among all of the 32 LQTS patients were the highest in lead V2 (36.5 [17.0–58.0] µV) and the second highest in lead V3 (32.5 [19.5–41.5] µV; Figure 1A). Hourly distribution of peak TWA in a 24-hour period is shown in Figure 1B. The incidence of peak TWA was higher during daytime (8:00–20:00) than during nighttime (20:00–8:00) in LQT1 patients, whereas all the peak TWA episodes were distributed during nighttime in LQT3 patients.

    Figure 1.

    Figure 1. A, Peak T-wave alternans (TWA) values in each lead in the entire group of patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) studied (n=32) were the highest in lead V2 (median [interquartile range]) (36.5 [17.0–58.0] µV) and the second highest in lead V3 (32.5 [19.5–41.5] µV). Open circles denote mild outliers (data points >25th percentile−1.5*interquartile range [IQR] or 75th percentile+1.5*IQR, but are not extreme outliers); asterisks represent extreme outliers (>25th percentile−3*IQR or 75th percentile+3*IQR). B, Hourly distribution of peak TWA in a 24-h period among the LQTS patients (n=32). The incidence of peak TWA was higher during daytime than during nighttime in patients with type 1 LQTS, whereas all the episodes of peak TWA were recorded during nighttime in patients with type 3 LQTS.

    Association of TWA With TdP History in LQTS Patients

    Eight (25%) of the 32 LQTS patients enrolled had a history of TdP. The association of TWA with a history of TdP in LQTS patients was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.82). The cut point TWA value of 42 µV with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 51.8–100) and a specificity of 41.7% (95% confidence interval, 22.1–63.4) was derived using Youden’s index. The group results for characteristics associated with TdP history including TWA ≥42 µV are shown in Table 3. There was no significant difference in peak TWA value between the TdP group and the non-TdP group. However, the TdP group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of TWA ≥42 µV than the non-TdP group (100% versus 58.3%; P=0.04). The median duration of peak TWA ≥42 µV was 15 s (interquartile range, 15–30 s; minimum–maximum, 15–45 s). One or more episodes of TWA ≥42 µV were observed in the same region of the heart at different times of the day in 16 (72.7%) of the 22 LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 μV.

    Figure 2 shows representative continuous 12-lead ECGs with visible TWA in a 2-year-old boy with LQT1 (Figure 2A) and a 58-year-old woman with LQTS (Figure 2B) with a history of TdP whose LQT type could not be identified. TWA ≥42 µV was narrowly distributed in the precordial leads. Specifically, visible TWA of 56 µV in lead V2 (Figure 2A) and of 44 and 54 µV in leads V5 and V6, respectively (Figure 2B), are marked with arrows.

    Figure 2.

    Figure 2. A, Twelve-lead electrocardiogram from a representative case (12-year-old boy) with long QT syndrome (LQTS) type 1, a history of torsade de pointes, and microvolt T-wave alternans (TWA). Left, Templates of superimposed waveforms in each lead at the time of peak TWA. Peak TWA of 56 µV was visible in lead V2 (indicated by red and blue arrows). TWA ≥42 µV could be detected only in lead V2. B, Representative 12-lead electrocardiogram exhibiting TWA in a 58-year-old women with LQTS but in whom the subtype was not identified. Left, Templates of superimposed waveforms in each lead at the time of peak TWA (54 µV) in lead V6. Red and blue arrows indicate TWA ≥42 µV detected only in leads V5 and V6.

    Continuous 12-lead ECG of an 8-year-old boy with LQT3 with frequent episodes of TdP is shown in Figure 3. In this patient, a total of 112 episodes of macroscopic TWA with beat-to-beat alternating polarity of the T wave, that is, T-wave polarity alternans (TWPA), were recorded. However, all of the episodes of TWPA were overlooked because of technical problems of MARS Holter Analysis Workstation Software version 8. By visual estimation, the amplitude of TWPA was ≥5000 µV (Figure 3), but the peak TWA value automatically generated by MARS version 8 Software was 611 µV, a significant underestimation. In some TWPA episodes, the dynamics of TWA, that is, the time of onset, peak, and termination of the alternans, varied from region to region, suggesting that alternation in polarity is a regionally independent property of TWA (Figure 3).

    Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram of a patient with the long QT syndrome showing an episode of macroscopic T-wave alternans (TWA) with regionally independent dynamics. Note that the dynamics of TWA in terms of onset, peak, and termination time varied regionally.

    At this time, 3 LQTS patients have experienced TdP since enrollment (at 28, 44, and 463 days after TWA testing, respectively), and all 3 exhibited TWA ≥42 µV at the time of joining the study.

    Distribution of the Lead With the Highest TWA Level in LQTS Patients

    Figure 4 represents the distribution of highest lead among all 32 LQTS patients enrolled (Figure 4A) and in the 22 LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV (Figure 4B). In the group as a whole, the most frequent highest lead was V2 in 14 (43.8%) LQTS patients. Highest lead was distributed in the precordial leads V1 through V4 and V6 in 30 (93.8%) LQTS patients (Figure 4A). Similarly, in the 22 LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV, the most frequent highest lead was V2 in 11 (50%) LQTS patients. Highest lead was distributed in the precordial leads V2 through V4 and V6 in 20 (90.9%) LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV (Figure 4B).

    Figure 4.

    Figure 4. A, Distribution of highest T-wave alternans (TWA) levels in each lead in the group of 32 patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS). The most frequent highest lead was V2 in 14 (43.8%) patients. Peak TWA appeared frequently in the precordial leads in 30 (93.8%) patients. B, Distribution of highest lead in the 22 patients with microvolt TWA ≥42 µV. The most frequent highest lead was V2 in 11 (50%) patients. Highest lead was distributed in the precordial leads V2 through V4 and V6 in 20 (90.9%) patients.

    Sensitivity for TWA ≥42 µV Detection in Each Lead in LQTS Patients

    In the 22 LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 µV, the median number of ECG leads with TWA of this level was only 2 (interquartile range, 1–3; minimum–maximum, 1–7). There was no significant difference in the number of ECG leads with TWA ≥42 µV comparing the TdP and the non-TdP groups (Table 3). The sensitivity for TWA ≥42 µV detection using a single ECG lead was the highest (63.6%) in lead V2 (Figure 5). By contrast, combined leads V2 through V5 detected 100% of the TWA ≥42 µV episodes.

    Figure 5.

    Figure 5. Sensitivity of recording leads for microvolt T-wave alternans ≥42 µV detection among patients with long QT (LQT) syndrome. The sensitivity was the highest in lead V2 at 63.6%.

    Discussion

    In the present study, we demonstrated that TWA ≥42 µV was found in 68.8% of all LQTS patients enrolled and in 100% of LQTS patients with a history of TdP, whereas none of the healthy subjects exhibited TWA ≥42 µV. Microvolt TWA ≥42 µV is narrowly distributed in the precordial leads (median, 2 ECG leads) in LQTS patients. Indeed, the sensitivity for TWA detection using a single ECG lead was 63.6% at maximum in lead V2, whereas the combined leads V2 through V5 detected 100% of the ≥42 µV TWA episodes.

    Microvolt TWA in Healthy Subjects

    No studies exclusively in normal individuals have been performed using either the frequency-domain spectral TWA method or the time-domain MMA-based TWA method. In this study, we demonstrated that peak TWA values were significantly lower in healthy subjects than in LQTS patients, and that none of the healthy subjects exhibited macroscopic TWA.

    Microvolt TWA in LQTS Patients

    Occurrence of visible, macroscopic TWA in patients with congenital LQTS has been reported to be 2.5% in standard 12-lead ECGs4 and 45% (5 of 11 patients) in ambulatory ECGs.18 Macroscopic TWA was reported to be a risk marker for cardiac events.4 In addition, several case reports demonstrated direct transition from macroscopic TWA to TdP, suggesting a direct link between macroscopic TWA and TdP, as reported in patients with both congenital LQTS5,6 and acquired LQTS.79

    The only clinical studies on the relationship between microvolt-level TWA and arrhythmia risk in LQTS patients used frequency-domain spectral analysis and drew negative conclusions about its significance.19,20 Specifically, Schmitt et al19 reported that none of the 10 LQTS patients with cardiac arrest or TdP exhibited a positive microvolt TWA test during monitoring of Frank orthogonal leads: X, Y, and Z during exercise, and concluded that microvolt TWA testing does not carry diagnostic value in LQTS patients. Similarly, Nemec et al20 reported that dobutamine-provoked microvolt TWA in leads aVF, V1, and V4 was negative in all of the 3 LQTS patients with a history of cardiac arrest and concluded that microvolt TWA does not identify high-risk subjects. Judging from our results, the regionally specific nature of TWA in LQTS patients and its narrow distribution may have led to an underestimation of TWA. Kaufman et al21 reported that only 3 (17.6%) of the 17 LQTS patients with a HERG (Human Ether-a-go-go Related Gene) mutation had positive microvolt TWA test during exercise despite the use of precordial leads V2 through V6. One potential explanation is that TWA episodes lasting <1 min were excluded from review in the study by Kaufman et al.21 In the present study, the duration of TWA ≥42 µV was <1 min in all the episodes. Hence, its transient occurrence may have led to underestimation of TWA in the study by Kaufman et al.21 Later, Kaufman et al17 demonstrated that unsustained TWA lasting <1 min carries predictive value in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

    Furthermore, in these 3 studies,1921 TWA testing was performed during a cardiac stress test: exercise or catecholamine-provocation. It has been reported that only 13% of cardiac events occurred during exercise in patients with LQTS 2 and 3.22 Moreover, only 427 of 1325 (32.2%) LQTS patients experienced their first cardiac events during acute arousal caused by exercise, swimming, emotion, or noise.23 In the present study, all the episodes of peak TWA in LQT3 patients were recorded during nighttime. These facts suggest that TWA in some of the patients with LQT3, as in the Brugada syndrome, may be rate suppressed.24,25

    These facts underscore the benefit of multilead precordial continuous ECG recordings during daily activities for TWA monitoring in LQTS patients. This approach is particularly appropriate for infants or young children, who are an important group for LQTS screening but who cannot undergo an exercise stress test. Indeed, in the study by Kaufman et al,21 more than half of the patients studied could not undergo microvolt TWA testing during exercise stress.

    In the present study, we used the time-domain MMA method for continuous microvolt TWA monitoring during daily activities. The templates of superimposed complexes provided by the MMA technology allow the clinician to confirm the transient surges in TWA of ≥20 µV that may disappear within 1 minute in LQTS patients and thus may be missed during routine review.

    Regional Specificity of TWA in LQTS Patients

    Information about regional distribution of TWA in LQTS patients is sparse. In the present study, we demonstrated that the distribution of TWA is narrowly localized in a median of 2 (interquartile range, 1–3; minimum–maximum, 1–7) ECG leads and is frequently recorded in the precordial leads. Moreover, in our patient with LQT3, TWA exhibited striking regionally independent dynamics (Figure 3).

    The usefulness of microvolt TWA testing using simplified 2- or 3-lead ambulatory ECG recordings in risk stratification for arrhythmic events in patients with ischemic/nonischemic cardiomyopathy has been established in several clinical studies.1 It is possible that patients with cardiomyopathy have widespread myocardial damage, and thus the simplified 2- or 3-lead ECG recorder is sufficient to detect TWA, which may be distributed extensively. By contrast, the regionally specific nature of TWA has been reported in the setting of acute myocardial ischemia.1316 In this context, TWA appears in the ischemic zone, probably because myocardial damage is localized in the ischemic area, whereas the rest of the myocardium is normal. Thus, TWA may be more narrowly distributed in patients with acute myocardial ischemia than in those with cardiomyopathy.

    A potential explanation for the regionally independent dynamics or narrow distribution of TWA is that the preceding diastolic interval, that is, the TQ interval, plays an important role in the initiation, maintenance, and termination of TWA.26,27 Gettes et al28 demonstrated that premature impulse with a diastolic interval >150 ms did not shorten the action potential duration (APD), whereas a significant abbreviation occurred when the diastolic interval lasted <150 ms in the isolated ventricular fiber of pig heart. We hypothesized that the APD of some myocardial layers in the anterior chest area may be longer than in other regions in LQTS patients. The postulated mechanism of the regional specificity of TWA in LQTS patients is illustrated in Figure 6. When an abrupt increase in heart rate occurs (beat ≈3) in site A with the shortest baseline APD, beat 3 with a sufficiently long preceding diastolic interval does not shorten the APD. On the contrary, in site C with the longest baseline APD, beat 3 with a very short preceding diastolic interval behaves as a premature beat and results in a shortening of the APD. This shortening, in turn, results in a prolongation of the following diastolic interval. Thus, beat 4 behaves like a nonpremature impulse and its APD returns to the baseline. This again shortens the following diastolic interval, and the process repeats until heart rate is reduced. Thereafter, APD alternans, that is, TWA, occurs only in the regions with disproportionally long APD relative to heart rate.

    Figure 6.

    Figure 6. Proposed mechanism of the regional specificity of T-wave alternans (TWA) in patients with long QT syndrome. When an abrupt increase in heart rate occurs (beat ≈3), in site A with the shortest baseline action potential duration (APD), beat 3 with a sufficiently long preceding diastolic interval does not shorten the APD. On the contrary, in site C with the longest baseline APD, beat 3 with a short preceding diastolic interval behaves as a premature beat and results in a shortening of the APD. This shortening, in turn, results in a prolongation of the following diastolic interval. Thus, beat 4 behaves like a nonpremature impulse, and its APD returns to the baseline. This again shortens the following diastolic interval and the process repeats until heart rate is reduced. Thereafter, the APD alternans, that is, TWA, occurs only in the regions with disproportionally long APD relative to heart rate.

    Medications and Microvolt TWA

    β-adrenergic blocking agents were used significantly more frequently in the TdP group than in the non-TdP group. This difference may have contributed to the absence of significant differences in peak TWA values in the 2 groups. TWA amplitude is reduced by antiarrhythmic agents such as metoprolol and d,l-sotalol in patients with a history of documented or suspected ventricular tachyarrhythmias.29 Case reports provide evidence that β-blockade also reduces TWA in parallel with arrhythmias in LQTS patients.30,31 It will be worthwhile to evaluate in a prospective study whether these observations characterize LQTS patients as a whole.

    Limitations

    First, our sample size was too limited to allow multivariate analysis to determine an independent relationship between TWA and TdP history although a significant association was demonstrated. Second, the Holter Analysis Workstation Software, MARS version 8, may overlook millivolt-level TWA, which is macroscopic, including TWPA. However, it is highly possible that LQTS patients with prominent millivolt-level TWA have more frequent episodes of microvolt-level TWA, as did our patient who exhibited peak microvolt-level TWA of 611 µV, which was automatically calculated by MARS. In this patient, all episodes of prominent TWA or TWPA were preceded by microvolt-level TWA when they were initiated by gradual R–R interval shortening. Third, we derived and used a cut point of 42 µV for an association with TdP history; this level varies from the 47-µV cut point recommended for assessing arrhythmia risk in patients with cardiovascular disease and may relate to the particular genetic basis for TdP in this highly arrhythmogenic syndrome.1 We noted that in all 3 LQTS patients who experienced TdP after enrollment, TWA met the 42-µV cut point. Fourth, TWA testing was not performed on multiple occasions to assess reproducibility of the findings; however, multiple episodes of TWA ≥42 µV were observed in the same region of the heart at different times of day in >70% of the LQTS patients with TWA ≥42 μV. Fifth, body position might have had a non-negligible effect on the lead distribution of TWA in freely moving subjects. Finally, clinical considerations dictated initiation of β-blockade or changes in medications after TWA testing in our LQTS patients. Thus, it was not possible to determine whether in the absence of therapy, TWA would have predicted arrhythmic events in the present study.

    Conclusions

    Automated monitoring of microvolt TWA identifies a greater prevalence of microvolt TWA episodes and a stronger association with TdP history in patients with LQTS than has been previously reported. Microvolt TWA is narrowly distributed and more common in the precordial leads than in other leads in patients with LQTS. Multilead ambulatory ECGs including precordial leads V2 through V5 should be used to avoid underestimating TWA, which may be a risk marker for TdP. The high prevalence of TWA in the precordial leads may provide insights into mechanisms.

    Footnotes

    Correspondence to Nobuhiro Takasugi, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501–1194, Japan. E-mail

    References

    • 1. Verrier RL, Klingenheben T, Malik M, El-Sherif N, Exner DV, Hohnloser SH, Ikeda T, Martínez JP, Narayan SM, Nieminen T, Rosenbaum DS.Microvolt T-wave alternans: physiological basis, methods of measurement, and clinical utility–consensus guideline by International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:1309–1324. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.029.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C.Cellular and ionic basis for T-wave alternans under long-QT conditions.Circulation. 1999; 99:1499–1507.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Schwartz PJ, Malliani A.Electrical alternation of the T-wave: clinical and experimental evidence of its relationship with the sympathetic nervous system and with the long Q-T syndrome.Am Heart J. 1975; 89:45–50.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Zareba W, Moss AJ, le Cessie S, Hall WJ.T wave alternans in idiopathic long QT syndrome.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23:1541–1546.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Goto H, Takasugi N, Kuwahara T, Verrier RL.QRST-wave alternans in a child with type 3 long-QT syndrome: an ominous ECG pattern appearing during transition from T-wave alternans to polymorphic VT.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25:657–658. doi: 10.1111/jce.12354.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Goldman DS, Zareba W, Moss AJ.Malignant T-wave alternans.Circulation. 2000; 102:E46–E47.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Grabowski M, Karpinski G, Filipiak KJ, Opolski G.Images in cardiovascular medicine. Drug-induced long-QT syndrome with macroscopic T-wave alternans.Circulation. 2004; 110:e459–e460. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147541.49575.15.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Armoundas AA, Nanke T, Cohen RJ.Images in cardiovascular medicine. T-wave alternans preceding torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia.Circulation. 2000; 101:2550.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Holley CL, Cooper JA.Macrovolt T-wave alternans and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.Circulation. 2009; 120:445–446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.861633.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Kawaguchi T, Takasugi N, Kubota T, Takasugi M, Kanamori H, Ushikoshi H, Hattori A, Aoyama T, Kawasaki M, Nishigaki K, Takemura G, Minatoguchi S, Verrier RL.In-hospital monitoring of T-wave alternans in a case of amiodarone-induced torsade de pointes: clinical and methodologic insights.Europace. 2012; 14:1372–1374. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus040.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, Blom N, Brugada J, Chiang CE, Huikuri H, Kannankeril P, Krahn A, Leenhardt A, Moss A, Schwartz PJ, Shimizu W, Tomaselli G, Tracy C.HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013.Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10:1932–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.05.014.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Nearing BD, Verrier RL.Modified moving average analysis of T-wave alternans to predict ventricular fibrillation with high accuracy.J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92:541–549. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00592.2001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Leino J, Verrier RL, Minkkinen M, Lehtimäki T, Viik J, Lehtinen R, Nikus K, Kööbi T, Turjanmaa V, Kähönen M, Nieminen T.Importance of regional specificity of T-wave alternans in assessing risk for cardiovascular mortality and sudden cardiac death during routine exercise testing.Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8:385–390. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.11.004.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Nearing BD, Oesterle SN, Verrier RL.Quantification of ischaemia induced vulnerability by precordial T wave alternans analysis in dog and human.Cardiovasc Res. 1994; 28:1440–1449.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Martínez JP, Olmos S, Wagner G, Laguna P.Characterization of repolarization alternans during ischemia: time-course and spatial analysis.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006; 53:701–711. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.870233.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Takasugi N, Kubota T, Nishigaki K, Verrier RL, Kawasaki M, Takasugi M, Ushikoshi H, Hattori A, Ojio S, Aoyama T, Takemura G, Minatoguchi S.Continuous T-wave alternans monitoring to predict impending life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias during emergent coronary reperfusion therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Europace. 2011; 13:708–715. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq512.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Kaufman ES, Bloomfield DM, Steinman RC, Namerow PB, Costantini O, Cohen RJ, Bigger JT. “Indeterminate” microvolt T-wave alternans tests predict high risk of death or sustained ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1399–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.044.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18. Cruz Filho FE, Maia IG, Fagundes ML, Barbosa RC, Alves PA, Sá RM, Boghossian SH, Ribeiro JC.Electrical behavior of T-wave polarity alternans in patients with congenital long QT syndrome.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36:167–173.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Schmitt J, Baumann S, Klingenheben T, Richter S, Duray G, Hohnloser SH, Ehrlich JR.Assessment of microvolt T-wave alternans in high-risk patients with the congenital long-QT syndrome.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2009; 14:340–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00323.x.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20. Nemec J, Ackerman MJ, Tester DJ, Hejlik J, Shen WK.Catecholamine-provoked microvoltage T wave alternans in genotyped long QT syndrome.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26:1660–1667.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Kaufman ES, Priori SG, Napolitano C, Schwartz PJ, Iyengar S, Elston RC, Schnell AH, Gorodeski EZ, Rammohan G, Bahhur NO, Connuck D, Verrilli L, Rosenbaum DS, Brown AM.Electrocardiographic prediction of abnormal genotype in congenital long QT syndrome: experience in 101 related family members.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001; 12:455–461.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 22. Schwartz PJ, Priori SG, Spazzolini C, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, Napolitano C, Denjoy I, Guicheney P, Breithardt G, Keating MT, Towbin JA, Beggs AH, Brink P, Wilde AA, Toivonen L, Zareba W, Robinson JL, Timothy KW, Corfield V, Wattanasirichaigoon D, Corbett C, Haverkamp W, Schulze-Bahr E, Lehmann MH, Schwartz K, Coumel P, Bloise R.Genotype-phenotype correlation in the long-QT syndrome: gene-specific triggers for life-threatening arrhythmias.Circulation. 2001; 103:89–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23. Ali RH, Zareba W, Moss AJ, Schwartz PJ, Benhorin J, Vincent GM, Locati EH, Priori S, Napolitano C, Towbin JA, Hall WJ, Robinson JL, Andrews ML, Zhang L, Timothy K, Medina A.Clinical and genetic variables associated with acute arousal and nonarousal-related cardiac events among subjects with long QT syndrome.Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85:457–461.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24. Nishizaki M, Fujii H, Sakurada H, Kimura A, Hiraoka M.Spontaneous T wave alternans in a patient with Brugada syndrome–responses to intravenous administration of class I antiarrhythmic drug, glucose tolerance test, and atrial pacing.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16:217–220. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.40411.x.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Uchimura-Makita Y, Nakano Y, Tokuyama T, Fujiwara M, Watanabe Y, Sairaku A, Kawazoe H, Matsumura H, Oda N, Ikanaga H, Motoda C, Kajihara K, Oda N, Verrier RL, Kihara Y.Time-domain T-wave alternans is strongly associated with a history of ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25:1021–1027. doi: 10.1111/jce.12441.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 26. Rosenbaum MB, Acunzo RS.Pseudo 2:1 atrioventricular block and T wave alternans in the long QT syndromes.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 18:1363–1366.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 27. Goto H, Takasugi N, Verrier RL, Kuwahara T.T-wave alternans, QRST-wave alternans and atrioventricular block: three consecutive rate-dependent phenomena in a child with congenital long-QT syndrome.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24:1183–1184. doi: 10.1111/jce.12169.MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Gettes LS, Morehouse N, Surawicz B.Effect of premature depolarization on the duration of action potentials in Purkinje and ventricular fibers of the moderator band of the pig heart. Role of proximity and the duration of the preceding action potential.Circ Res. 1972; 30:55–66.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 29. Klingenheben T, Grönefeld G, Li YG, Hohnloser SH.Effect of metoprolol and d,l-sotalol on microvolt-level T-wave alternans. Results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38:2013–2019.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Mache CJ, Beitzke A, Haidvogl M, Gamillscheg A, Suppan C, Stein JI.Perinatal manifestations of idiopathic long QT syndrome.Pediatr Cardiol. 1996; 17:118–121. doi: 10.1007/BF02505096.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Bosi G, Cappato R, Priori SG, Stramba-Badiale M.Complex electrocardiographic findings in a neonate with long QT syndrome.Ital Heart J. 2002; 3:605–607.MedlineGoogle Scholar