Reversible and Irreversible Effects of Electroporation on Contractility and Calcium Homeostasis in Isolated Cardiac Ventricular Myocytes
Irreversible electroporation is an energy form utilizing high-voltage pulsed electric field, leading to cellular homeostasis disruption and cell death. Recently, irreversible electroporation has shown promising results for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. However, reversible and irreversible effects of pulsed electric field on cardiac myocytes remain poorly understood. Here, we evaluated the influence of a monophasic single electric pulse (EP) on the contractility, Ca2+ homeostasis and recovery of cardiac myocytes.
Isolated rat left ventricular myocytes were electroporated using single monophasic EP of different durations and voltages. Sarcomere length and intracellular Ca2+ were simultaneously monitored for up to 20 minutes after EP application in Fura-2 loaded left ventricular myocytes. Lethal voltage thresholds were determined using 100 µs and 10 ms pulses and by discriminating cell orientation with respect to the electric field.
Electroporation led to an immediate increase in intracellular Ca2+ which was dependent upon the voltage delivered to the cell. Intermediate-voltage EP (140 V, 100 µs) increased sarcomere shortening, Ca2+ transient amplitude, and diastolic Ca2+ level measured 1 minute post-EP. Although sarcomere shortening returned to pre-EP level within 5 minutes, Ca2+ transient amplitude decreased further below pre-EP level and diastolic Ca2+ level remained elevated within 20 minutes post-EP. Spontaneous contractions were observed after sublethal EP application but their frequency decreased progressively within 20 minutes. Lethal EP voltage threshold was lower in myocytes oriented perpendicular than parallel to the electric field using 100 µs pulses while an opposite effect was found using 10 ms pulses.
Sublethal EP affected rat left ventricular myocytes contractility and disrupted Ca2+ homeostasis as a function of the EP voltage. Moreover, EP-induced lethality was preceded by a large increase in intracellular Ca2+ and was dependent upon the EP duration, amplitude and left ventricular myocytes orientation with respect to the electric field. These findings provide new insights into the effect of pulsed electric field on cardiac myocytes.
What Is Known?
Electroporation is a promising novel energy modality for safe, efficient cardiac arrhythmia ablation.
Pulsed-electrical fields may induce both reversible and irreversible electroporation when applied to the myocardium but these effects remain poorly characterized.
What the Study Adds
Irreversible electroporation is preceded by a large increase in intracellular Ca2+ and depends on the pulse amplitude and duration.
Cell orientation with respect to the electrical field is a determinant of myocyte’s lethality induced by electroporation.
Sublethal electroporation is associated with perturbations in intracellular Ca2+ and contractility in isolated myocytes.
Electroporation is a phenomenon which is associated with transient increase in membrane permeability and is achieved by cell exposure to high-voltage electric pulses (EPs). When cells are exposed to electric field strengths and duration that exceed a threshold, the increase in membrane permeability and disruption of cell homeostasis will lead to cell death. This is described as irreversible electroporation (IRE). Cells following exposure to electric fields below the IRE threshold may however regain homeostasis and survive.1 Technologies leveraging pulsed electric field (PEF) to achieve reversible and IRE have been developed in a broad range of medical specialties including oncology,2–6 neurology,7,8,9,10 dermatology11,12 and most recently, cardiology.13,14,15,16 Specifically, the use of PEF to ablate aberrant cardiac tissues via IRE is rapidly emerging as a promising energy modality in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Traditional cardiac ablation techniques involve the use of thermal energy modalities such as radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation.17,18 One of the most common procedures within cardiac catheter ablation is pulmonary vein isolation. Pulmonary vein isolation aims to isolate atrial fibrillation triggers located in the pulmonary veins via selective ablation of this area. Although pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation technologies are approved and generally effective and safe clinical procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, they are still plagued by both safety and efficacy issues. For example, thermal-based energy modalities used for pulmonary vein isolation procedures may cause collateral and detrimental tissue damage leading to pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve paralysis, esophageal fistulas, or bronchial damage. Incomplete lesion formation can result in pulmonary vein reconnection and arrhythmia recurrence.19
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a term used to describe the use of IRE to ablate cardiac tissues for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. PFA utilizes hundreds to thousands of volts applied to electrodes on a catheter either in a monopolar or bipolar fashion/mode to induce cell death via membrane hyperpermeabilization mechanisms. PFA holds great promise and potential advantages over traditional energy modalities and may be able to alleviate/mitigate limitations of the thermal-based ablation modalities including collateral damage. It has been hypothesized that cardiac cells may be more sensitive to IRE than other cell types, such as nerve cells or smooth muscle cells, and thus less collateral injury is expected with PFA. This hypothesis is also supported by absence of side effects in preclinical as well as clinical studies.14,20–23 For example, in a recent preclinical study on PFA, a significantly reduced risk of pulmonary vein stenosis was reported in comparison to radiofrequency in a canine model.24 Radiofrequency ablations resulted in vagus nerve, esophageal, and lung injury, whereas this was not observed with PFA.,14,24 Although mechanisms of cell death after EP are complex,25 cell death mechanisms (and dynamics) of cardiac cells in response to PEF are not well understood. That said, it is generally known in the field of IRE that cell death is a function of the electric field.26 Because the ultimate goal of PFA is IRE, the application of high voltages to membranes may also induce reversible effects.1 Reversible electroporation is inevitable in vivo given the electric field distribution around electrodes.,27,28 Considering that electric field strength drops as the distance from the electrodes increases, it can be expected that a volume exists adjacent to the electrodes above the IRE threshold where all cells will die. Surrounding that ablated volume, there may be a region of tissue where transient or reversible effects will be induced. In this context, our understanding of the reversible and IRE effects on cardiac cellular function related to PEF application is desperately needed. In nerves, electrode proximity and voltage (field strength) can dose-dependently increase neural stunning times of paced phrenic nerves after PFA application.29 Previous defibrillation research has demonstrated transient effects on cardiac cell permeability in the early 2000s, such (electrical) stunning phenomenon has not been described in the context of PEF aimed to ablate cardiac tissue.30,31 It is possible that reversibly effected, that is “(electrically) stunned” zones could be observed clinically and would be interpreted as acute procedural success. But if such stunned zones recover, the ablation therapy could fail due to incomplete lesion formation/electrical isolation with subsequent pulmonary vein reconnection. Moreover, the orientation of elongated cells in electric field affects EP,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 which can play a significant role in ablating heart tissue where structure (position of cells) and function are strongly connected.
Due to the central role of Ca2+ in excitation-contraction coupling, we hypothesized that varying doses of PEF will modulate both Ca2+ levels and mechanical function of isolated cardiac myocytes. Gaining knowledge of EP effect on contractility and Ca2+ is becoming more relevant as PFA is now in clinical development and is speculated to become the preferred energy modality for cardiac ablation.,20,21,40,41,42,43
Thus, the goal of this study was to characterize reversible and irreversible effects of high voltage PEF on isolated left ventricular myocyte’s (LVM) contractile function, Ca2+ transient (CaTr) and recovery or cell death over a clinically relevant time frame (generally 20 minutes).44 Studied variables included pulse parameters (voltage, pulse width), pacing, as well as cell orientation in the applied electric fields.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All experiments were performed in accordance with the European Union council directive 2010/63/EU for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes following local ethical committee approval.
Isolation of Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Male Wistar rat (250–350 g) were anesthetized (Isoflurane, 2.5%–3%) and euthanized. Hearts were quickly excised, mounted on a Langendorff system, and perfused at 8 mL/min (37 °C) through the aorta with an oxygenated isolation solution containing (in mM): 130 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 1.4 MgCl2, 0.4 NaH2PO4, 5 HEPES, 10 Glucose, 10 Creatine, 20 Taurine (pH 7.4 with NaOH), and 0.75 mM CaCl2. The hearts were then perfused with the isolation solution supplemented with 0.1 mM Ethyleneglycol- bis(β-aminoethyl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic Acid (EGTA) and finally with the same solution with the addition of collagenases (type II, 1 mg/mL; Worthington) and proteases (type XIV, 0.1 mg/mL; Sigma Aldrich) fwor 8 to 10 minutes. The left ventricles were then dissected, cut into small pieces and gently shaken at 37 °C in the enzymatic solution. Myocytes were collected by filtration through a nylon gauze and were used within 8 hours.45
Simultaneous Measurement of Sarcomere Length and Intracellular Ca2+
LVM were placed in a perfusion chamber mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (Eclipse Ti-U, Nikon; France) and continuously perfused with a Tyrode solution (mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.0 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose and 10 Hepes (pH 7.4 with NaOH) at 34 °C to 37 °C (TC2BIP; Cell MicroControls). Cardiomyocytes were paced via field-stimulation to contract at 1 Hz (ds2a field-stimulator, Digitimer Ltd, United Kingdom) and sarcomere length continuously monitored through a video-detection system (IonOptix Corporation). In some experiments, intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) level was simultaneously monitored in myocytes loaded with 4 µM Fura-2 Fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Invitrogen) (Invitrogen). Briefly, following excitation at 340 and 380 nm, the emission light was collected at 510±40 nm through a photomultiplier tube connected to a spectrophotometer system (Cairn Research, United Kingdom). The ratio of the emitted light in response to 340 and 380 nm excitation was used as an index of [Ca2+]i. Sarcomere shortening expressed as a percentage of resting sarcomere length, diastolic intracellular Ca2+ level and CaTr amplitudes were analyzed using IonWizard (IonOptix Corporation).46 For pacing-induced activity, all measurements were performed at steady state and the analysis was done on averaged trace of 10 consecutive beats.
PEF Treatment Protocols
Only rod-shaped myocytes showing clear striations were used. When the role of cell orientation with respect to the electric field was studied, only cells showing axis angle with respect to electric field of 0±10° (parallel) and 90±10° (perpendicular) were used for the experiments. Myocytes were exposed to EP at various voltage amplitudes using 2 platinum electrodes (4 mm spacing) connected to both a field-stimulator and a PEF generator (Electro Cell B10, Leroy Biotech, France) producing an electric field used for either pacing and electroporation, respectively.47 Electric field intensity (E) estimated as a voltage-to distance ratio and given in V/cm is provided for easier comparison. PEF were applied as a single monophasic EP of 100 µs duration at low (80 V [E=200 V/cm]), medium (140 V [E=350 V/cm]) voltage. At these field strengths, both contractility and [Ca2+]i were monitored independently of cell orientation relative to the PEF. High-sublethal voltage EP (100 µs duration) were applied either between 300 and 440 V (E=750–1100 V/cm) to cells oriented parallel to the electric field or between 140 and 200 V (E=350–500 V/cm) to cells oriented perpendicular while monitoring contractility and [Ca2+]i. Pacing was stopped just before the EP application, and myocytes were left unpaced for 1 minutes after EP delivery. Sarcomere length and [Ca2+]i were monitored during this unpaced period. After 1 minute, myocyte pacing was resumed to assess contractile and [Ca2+]i recovery. Then, pacing was stopped and resumed every 5 minutes over a 20-minute period to monitor the presence of spontaneous contractions (Figure S1 for protocol design). Cells that recovered were then exposed to voltages of increasing intensity to identify the lethal voltage values. Another set of experiments was conducted in which EP was delivered under continuous pacing at 1 Hz. During this investigation, both sarcomere shortening and [Ca2+]i parameters were evaluated every 5 minutes over a 20-minute period (Figure S2). We established the lethality profile by applying a single 10 ms EP at different voltage amplitudes (50–140 V). A complementary metal oxide semiconductor camera connected to the side port of the microscope (Imaging-S IMX265LQR, Imaging Source, Germany) was used to image isolated cardiac myocytes within the field of view prior and ≈30 s after EP application. The percentage of rod-shaped striated cells which died upon EP application (as determined by morphological assessment) was calculated separately for parallel- and perpendicular-oriented myocytes with respect to the electric field.
Experimental data are expressed as means±SEM; n represents the number of experiments; N represents the number of animals used for the experiments. Samples were tested for normal distribution with d’Agostino-Pearson. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California). Unpaired t test, paired t tests, or repeated-measure 1-way ANOVA or their respective nonparametric tests were used to compare our conditions. Differences were considered significant for P<0.05.
Effect of Low- and Intermediate-Voltage PEFs on Left Ventricular Myocyte Contractility and [Ca2+]i
Typical sarcomere length and [Ca2+]i traces are presented in Figures 1A and 1B prior to, during and 1 minute after the EP application of a 100 µs pulse with low- (80 V) and intermediate- (140 V) voltage amplitudes, respectively. In this context, the EP induced an immediate increase in [Ca2+]i reaching higher level than systolic [Ca2+]i observed when pacing at 1 Hz resulting in a large sarcomere shortening. At low-voltage amplitudes, the first peak CaTr recorded after EP was similar in amplitude to the first transient obtained upon resuming field-stimulation after an unpaced period and was reminiscent of postrest potentiation.48 At intermediate-voltage amplitudes, the first CaTr after EP was slightly greater than postrest first CaTr (Figure S2). This PEF-induced immediate increase in [Ca2+]i was followed by a fast decrease in [Ca2+]i accompanied by sarcomere relaxation similar to that observed upon pacing LVM. However, this relaxation was incomplete and [Ca2+]i remained elevated for several seconds before returning closer to initial diastolic levels within 1 minute and beyond (Figures 1 and 2). At 1 minute post-EP, when 1 Hz pacing was resumed, a significant increase in sarcomere shortening was observed, which appeared to be dependent on the voltage amplitude of the pulse (Figure 1C). At low voltage, no significant change in CaTr amplitude (Figure 1D) or diastolic Ca2+ level (Figure 1E) could be observed. However, exposure to intermediate voltage amplitudes led to a significant increase in both these parameters (Figures 1D and 1E). The reversibility of the contractility and [Ca2+]i changes induced by an intermediate voltage pulse was then assessed over a 20-minute time period by intermittently pacing myocytes at 1 Hz every 5 minutes (Figure 2). Potential time-dependent effects were first ruled out by sarcomere length and monitoring [Ca2+]i over a 20-minute period in LVM not exposed to an EP (Figure S3). Representative traces showing sarcomere length and [Ca2+]i traces at different times after exposure to an intermediate voltage amplitudes are shown on Figure 2A. The increase in sarcomere shortening and CaTr amplitude observed at 1 minute after EP returned to pre-EP levels at 5 minutes (Figures 2B and 2C). A significant decrease in CaTr amplitudes was observed at 10, 15 and 20 minutes after EP (Figure 2C). Diastolic Ca2+ levels increased at 1 minute following exposure to 140 V and did not return to baseline level within 20 minutes (Figure 2D). Similar results were obtained with continuous electrical pacing at 1 Hz throughout the protocol’s duration (Figure S4) with the exception of sarcomere shortening being significantly reduced 10, 15, and 20 minutes after EP.
High-Voltage PEFs Differentially Affect LVMs Depending on Their Orientation With Respect to Electric Field
After exposing LVM to low- and intermediate-voltage amplitudes, we then applied EPs of increasing voltage amplitude to determine the voltage threshold at which myocytes were irreversibly electroporated. This experiment is illustrated in Figure 3A. Twenty minutes after a first pulse delivery (100 µs, 140 V), myocytes partially recovered (as seen in Figure 2) and were then subjected to several pulses of increasing amplitude. Lethal effect, as determined by a loss of LVM morphological integrity (ie, shrinking from rod-shaped to round-shaped myocytes with loss of clear striations), was achieved at lower voltages in perpendicular cells than in parallel cells (Figures 3B and 3C). The diastolic Ca2+ levels found in cells for both orientations at lethal voltages were significantly different (Figure 3B). Similar, albeit somewhat higher) lethal thresholds were also obtained with a different protocol consisting of applying a single monophasic EP to the cell (Figure S4), that is, avoiding potential cumulative effect of multiple pulses being applied to the same cells. We also assessed the effect of longer-lasting electroporating pulses on lethality in both perpendicular and parallel-oriented myocytes with respect to electric field. Quiescent myocytes were exposed to single 10 ms electroporating pulses of different voltage amplitudes and lethality was assessed by image analysis (Figure S6A). Interestingly, for this pulse duration, parallel myocytes were more sensitive to PEF-induced cell death than perpendicular cells (Figure S6B and Table S1). This led us to assess the effect of high voltage, sublethal PEF on contractility and [Ca2+]i at distinct voltage amplitudes for these 2 cell subpopulations, that is, 300 to 340 V for cells oriented parallel and 140 to 200 V for cells oriented perpendicular to the electric field. At 1 minute post-EP with high voltage, sublethal pulses, 60% of perpendicular, and 55% of parallel cells presented elevated diastolic [Ca2+]i level and remained unresponsive to pacing. In cells that responded to pacing at 1 minute post-EP, a significant increase in sarcomere shortening was observed in perpendicular but not in parallel myocytes following 1 minute after EP (Figure S7A and S7B). At this time, high voltage pulses did not significantly alter CaTr amplitudes in either cell groups but there was a trend for an increase in diastolic Ca2+ level in both parallel and perpendicular myocytes (Figure S7). At 5 minutes after applying a high voltage amplitude pulse, a significant increase in sarcomere shortening was observed in LVM for both orientations (Figures 4A, 4B, 4C and 4F), despite no change in CaTr (Figures 4D and 4G). This increase in sarcomere shortening returned to baseline after 10 and 15 minutes in perpendicular and parallel cells, respectively, and remained stable until 20 minutes after EP. As seen with intermediate voltage pulses, a progressive decrease in CaTr amplitude was found in both parallel and perpendicular cells between 5 and 20 minutes after pulse application. High voltage pulses induced a significant increase in diastolic Ca2+ levels at 5 minutes in parallel-oriented myocytes which remained constant within 20 minutes post-EP (Figure 4E). In myocytes oriented perpendicular to the electric field, the increase in diastolic Ca2+ levels was progressive and only reached statistical significance at 15 and 20 minutes after EP (Figure 4H).
PEF-Induced Alteration in Ca2+ Level and Spontaneous Contractile Activity
Independently of the voltage applied and of cell orientation relative to the applied field, a monophasic single EP application induced an instantaneous increase in [Ca2+]i followed by a rapid decrease and either a plateau phase, for low- and intermediate-voltage pulses, or a slow increase in diastolic Ca2+ for high voltage pulses (Figure 5A). Interestingly this is consistent with transiently increased membrane permeability described in electroporation for Ca2+ and/or other ions and molecules. The maximum increase in diastolic Ca2+ levels showed dependency on EP voltage amplitude with higher voltages leading to greater diastolic Ca2+ accumulation (Figure 5B and 5C). It must be noted that during this time of increased Ca2+, myocytes were not responsive to electrical pacing pulses. This increase in diastolic Ca2+ levels was followed by spontaneous Ca2+ events (not shown) and contractions which progressively disappeared with time whatever the voltage (Figure 5D).These spontaneous events were only observed in reversibly electroporated myocytes. In myocytes exposed to IRE, intracellular Ca2+ continued to rise after PEF application until cell death.
This study provides new insights into the effects of PEF on LVM function. We determined for the first time the influence of PEF on myocyte contractile function and [Ca2+]i over a clinically relevant time scale (20 minutes). This constitutes an important step to better understand mechanisms involved in cardiac PFA. As clinical ablation therapies based on the principles of IRE are being developed, it is important to understand the underlying cellular effects of irreversible but also of reversible electroporation in cardiac myocytes.
Effects of Sublethal EPs on Ventricular Myocyte Excitation-Contraction Coupling
EP is being exploited in a large spectrum of biological discoveries and clinical treatments. Reversible electroporation is used for gene delivery49 or enhancing chemotherapy effectiveness,6 whereas IRE is used in treatments involving oncology6 and cardiac ablation domains.,14,21,43,50 However, it must be noted that even when IRE is used, electric field attenuation within the tissue as a function of distance to the electrodes may lead to reversible effects in the adjacent myocardium.
It is well established that the cardiac contractility is modulated by a specific equilibrium of intracellular Ca2+.51 Thus, the process of excitation-contraction coupling is important because it is at the interface of the electrical membrane activity (action potential) and cell contraction.52 Normal heart function requires an accurate regulation of [Ca2+]i to ensure fine-tuned diastolic (low [Ca2+]i) and systolic (high [Ca2+]i) cycles in normal heart function. In our study, we found that EPs perturbed intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. First, we found an elevated [Ca2+]i plateau which followed EP application before returning to lower diastolic levels in LVM exposed to low-, intermediate-, and high-sublethal voltage EPs. This intracellular accumulation of Ca2+ depended directly upon EP voltage amplitudes and was associated with cell death when subsequent PEF of increasing amplitude were applied to myocytes. Such a PEF voltage-dependent effect was likely related to an increase in sarcolemma pore density which is known to increase with increasing electric field strengths.38 The degree of membrane (electro)permeabilization is a key factor determining the fate of the cell after exposure to high voltage amplitudes; either cell death (IRE) or recovery (reversible electroporation). Indeed, this physiological process (cell recovery) is crucial to maintain cellular function and to preserve the integrity of the plasma membrane as well as the Ca2+ handling machinery53–55 to limit undesirable exchange of ions and other components between intracellular and extracellular media. Here, we could not determine the Sarco/endoplasmic calcium ATPase (SERCA) or sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) function in myocytes immediately after EP application as these would not respond to pacing at this point. However, at 1 minute after EP—or 5 minutes for high voltage EPs—the CaTr decay time constant, an index of function of Ca2+ removal pathways, was similar to that measured prior to EP for all sublethal voltages. It has been previously shown that the recovery times of cells/tissues exposed to electroporating pulses depend mainly on the pulse settings (e.g. waveform, voltage), the cell orientation and the experimental buffer.,34,39,56 Note that myocytes partially recovered their capacity to normally respond to the pacing as early as 1 minute after EP for low- and intermediate-voltage amplitudes. However, after this time, we also identified spontaneous contractions which were associated with spontaneous intracellular Ca2+ releases and elevated diastolic Ca2+ levels. Those spontaneous contractions were more frequent when myocytes were exposed to high voltage EP, indicative of a possible membrane defect (cell membrane and/or sarcoplasmic reticulum). Abnormal intracellular Ca2+ responses have been described upon exposing mouse ventricular myocytes to repetitive nanoseconds pulse-width PEFs.37 In our study, we observed these events already after the application of a single monophasic EP, but these may be expected also after a train of pulses being delivered. Further work will be required to confirm the effect of PEFs on Ca2+ homeostasis at the tissue level in coupled myocytes and evaluate their arrhythmogenic potential. To our knowledge, no arrhythmic event has been reported from clinical and preclinical studies using PFA. We can speculate that the large increase in diastolic Ca2+ level induced by PEFs may induce a closure of the connexins and reduce cell-to-cell coupling until intracellular Ca2+ levels are regulated. This would prevent the propagation of the spontaneous arrhythmogenic Ca2+ events to the surrounding myocardium. It must be noted that EP appeared to be reversible (20 minutes after EP) and may thus indicate the cells’ ability to regulate their Ca2+ homeostasis to maintain their function. Interestingly 5 to 20 minutes is also time reported for cell membrane resealing in electroporation in vitro.,35,58,39,57 Previous studies demonstrated similar time courses of recovery after the exposure to high-voltage amplitudes.25,35,39,57,59–61 Here, despite an initial increase in sarcomere shortening and CaTr upon resuming pacing, there was a trend for a decrease in these parameters below their control level and a rise in diastolic [Ca2+]i within a 20-minute time frame after EP. These results suggest myocytes may not completely recover from PEF application within the observed 20 minutes although further experimental investigations are required to evaluate myocyte recovery in the longer term.
Influence of Cell Orientation With Respect to the Electric Field on Myocyte IRE
Irreversible electroporation, resulting in cell death, caused by electroporating pulses is mainly related to increased permeabilization of the plasma membrane which occurs when the membrane potential reaches supraphysiologic values. Indeed, when the membrane potential exceeds a critical value, a disruption of the plasma membrane structure can trigger a detrimental biological process which is manifested by the formation and expansion of large hydrophilic pores, massive Ca2+ influx, mitochondrial damage leading to ATP depletion, reactive oxygen species production, and an increase of the cell content leakage inexorably leading to cell death.35,62–66
Interestingly, when applying 100 µs pulses, we observed that cells oriented perpendicular were more sensitive to the PEF-induced cell death than cells oriented parallel to the electric field. The elongated geometry of LVM may contribute to this effect as suggested in silico by others.67 The specific membrane structure of LVM with transverse tubules may also contribute although this will require further investigations. However, when applying 10 ms pulses the opposite effect was observed, that is, cells oriented parallel were more sensitive to PEF-induced cell death then cells oriented perpendicular to the electric field. Parallel cells being more sensitive than perpendicular is in line with previous study in which authors also identified a lower lethal threshold in ventricular myocytes oriented parallel to the electric field using 10 ms pulses.,35,39 For millisecond pulses, it has been suggested this could be related to the fact that the maximum change in membrane potential occurs at the cell ends which are close to the electrodes and to the threshold for electroporation which is proportional to the cell length in the direction of the field.38
A similar change in sensitivity of cells to PEF according to their orientation has recently been unveiled in cardiac-like cell lines, where short and long pulses had opposite effects, a similar observation as in our study—although the crossover pulse duration appeared to happen at shorter pulse durations.38 This discrepancy may be related to the different type of cells and their respective geometries and membrane properties. The mechanisms underlying this different sensitivity to EP in parallel and perpendicular cells according to pulse duration are not well explained but may involve differences in the way pores are formed37 or membrane curvature.67 Identifying the pulse parameters for which parallel and perpendicular cells share a similar sensitivity to IRE, may facilitate the creation of more homogeneous lesions within the thickness of tissues with heterogeneously-oriented cells such as in the atrial wall.
The study was conducted on isolated rat LVM. Different cardiac cell types (e.g. atrial, conduction system) or species (large animal, human) could be associated with different effects. For example, atrial myocytes and Purkinje cells are known to have different structures with less transverse tubules compared with ventricular myocytes.,68,69 In order to carefully identify the effects of PEFs on cardiac myocytes we used monophasic single pulses of varying duration and amplitude. However, clinical IRE protocols typically involve biphasic train of pulses. These protocols may require higher field strength as suggested by former studies in noncardiac cell lines.,70,71 The mechanisms by which PEFs affect Ca2+ homeostasis and contractility described in the present study are likely to be similar. Furthermore, it is also well established that there are physiological or pathological ionic current remodeling and Ca2+ handling changes according to the species and age that may influence PEF-induced Ca2+ changes and interpretations.72,73
We identified reversible effects of PEF on isolated LVM excitation-contraction coupling during a clinically relevant time scale and defined the impact of Ca2+ changes in IRE myocyte. Myocyte capacity to recover from a monophasic PEF was time-dependent and was related to pulse voltage and duration. Irreversible effects, that is, cell death, involved a large increase in [Ca2+]i and strongly depended on myocyte orientation within the electric field. Further work is however necessary to expand the knowledge from monophasic single pulses of 100 µs and 10 ms pulses used in our study to multiple pulse frequencies and biphasic waveforms on cardiac myocytes.
We thank Celine Ayez for taking care of the animals.
Sources of Funding
This study was funded by Medtronic.
left ventricular myocytes
pulsed electric field
pulsed field ablation
Disclosures Drs Sigg and Stewart are employees of Medtronic. Dr Miklavčič is a Medtronic consultant. Drs Batista Napotnik and Miklavčič received a Medtronic grant. The other authors report no conflicts.
Kotnik T, Rems L, Tarek M, Miklavcic D. Membrane electroporation and electropermeabilization: mechanisms and models.Annu Rev Biophys. 2019; 48:63–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115451CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Gehl J, Frandsen SK. Electroporation-based therapies in the treatment of cancer.Ugeskr Laeger. 2019; 181:1953–1957.Google Scholar
Campana LG, Edhemovic I, Soden D, Perrone AM, Scarpa M, Campanacci L, Cemazar M, Valpione S, Miklavcic D, Mocellin S,. Electrochemotherapy - emerging applications technical advances, new indications, combined approaches, and multi-institutional collaboration.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019; 45:92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.023CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Campana LG, Miklavcic D, Bertino G, Marconato R, Valpione S, Imarisio I, Dieci MV, Granziera E, Cemazar M, Alaibac M,. Electrochemotherapy of superficial tumors - current status:: basic principles, operating procedures, shared indications, and emerging applications.Semin Oncol. 2019; 46:173–191. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.04.002CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Liu ZG, Chen XH, Yu ZJ, Lv J, Ren ZG. Recent progress in pulsed electric field ablation for liver cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26:3421–3431. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i24.3421CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Geboers B, Scheffer HJ, Graybill PM, Ruarus AH, Nieuwenhuizen S, Puijk RS, van den Tol PM, Davalos RV, Rubinsky B, de Gruijl TD,. High-voltage electrical pulses in oncology: irreversible electroporation, electrochemotherapy, gene electrotransfer, electrofusion, and electroimmunotherapy.Radiology. 2020; 295:254–272. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192190CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
LoTurco J, Manent JB, Sidiqi F. New and improved tools for in utero electroporation studies of developing cerebral cortex.Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19Suppl 1:i120–125. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp033CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Azzarelli R, Oleari R, Lettieri A, Andre V, Cariboni A. In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo techniques to study neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex.Brain Sci. 2017; 7:48. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7050048CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eid L, Lachance M, Hickson G, Rossignol E. Ex utero electroporation and organotypic slice cultures of embryonic mouse brains for live-imaging of migrating GABAergic interneurons.J Vis Exp. 2018; 134:57526. doi: 10.3791/57526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Acerbo E, Safieddine S, Weber P, Botzanowski B, Missey F, Carrere M, Gross RE, Bartolomei F, Carron R, Jirsa V,. Non-thermal electroporation ablation of epileptogenic zones stops seizures in mice while providing reduced vascular damage and accelerated tissue recovery.Front Behav Neurosci. 2021; 15:774999. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.774999CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Landstrom FJ, Nilsson CO, Crafoord S, Reizenstein JA, Adamsson GB, Lofgren LA. Electroporation therapy of skin cancer in the head and neck area.Dermatol Surg. 2010; 36:1245–1250. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01617.xCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Nuccitelli R. Nano-pulse stimulation, a nonthermal energy modality for targeting cells.Hayward, CA, United States:Pulse Biosciences. 2022; 11:349–362. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820594-5.00002-2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reddy VY, Koruth J, Jais P, Petru J, Timko F, Skalsky I, Hebeler R, Labrousse L, Barandon L, Kralovec S,. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with pulsed electric fields: an ultra-rapid, tissue-selective modality for cardiac ablation.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4:987–995. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.005CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Koruth JS, Petru J, Funosako M, Cochet H, Sediva L, Chovanec M, Dukkipati SR, Jais P. Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74:315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.021CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
McBride S, Avazzadeh S, Wheatley AM, O’Brien B, Coffey K, Elahi A, O’Halloran M, Quinlan LR. Ablation modalities for therapeutic intervention in arrhythmia-related cardiovascular disease: focus on electroporation.J Clin Med. 2021; 10:2657.doi: 10.3390/jcm10122657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verma A, Boersma L, Haines DE, Natale A, Marchlinski FE, Sanders P, Calkins H, Packer DL, Hummel J, Onal B,. First-in-human experience and acute procedural outcomes using a novel pulsed field ablation system: the PULSED AF pilot trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022; 15:e010168. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010168LinkGoogle Scholar
Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J, Roux JF, Yung D, Skanes A, Khaykin Y,. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation.N Engl J Med. 2021; 384:305–315. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029980CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Bourier F, Ramirez FD, Martin CA, Vlachos K, Frontera A, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Lam A, Duchateau J, Pambrun T,. Impedance, power, and current in radiofrequency ablation: Insights from technical, ex vivo, and clinical studies.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020; 31:2836–2845. doi: 10.1111/jce.14709CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J,. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace. 2018; 20:e1–e160. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux274CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Koruth JS, Kuroki K, Kawamura I, Stoffregen WC, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Reddy VY. Focal pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation and linear atrial lesions: a preclinical assessment of safety and durability.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13:e008716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008716LinkGoogle Scholar
Reddy VY, Anter E, Rackauskas G, Peichl P, Koruth JS, Petru J, Funasako M, Minami K, Natale A, Jais P,. Lattice-tip focal ablation catheter that toggles between radiofrequency and pulsed field energy to treat atrial fibrillation: a first-in-human trial.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13:e008718. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008718LinkGoogle Scholar
Stewart MT, Haines DE, Miklavcic D, Kos B, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Mattison L, Martien M, Onal B, Howard B,. Safety and chronic lesion characterization of pulsed field ablation in a Porcine model.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32:958–969. doi: 10.1111/jce.14980CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stewart MT, Haines DE, Verma A, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Grassl E, Howard B. Intracardiac pulsed field ablation: proof of feasibility in a chronic porcine model.Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16:754–764. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.030CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Howard B, Haines DE, Verma A, Packer D, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Onal B, Fraasch S, Miklavcic D, Stewart MT. Reduction in pulmonary vein stenosis and collateral damage with pulsed field ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation in a canine model.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13:e008337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008337LinkGoogle Scholar
Krauthamer V, Jones JL. Calcium dynamics in cultured heart cells exposed to defibrillator-type electric shocks.Life Sci. 1997; 60:1977–1985. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(97)00162-8CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, Kotnik T, Miklavcic D. Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges.Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014; 16:295–320. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-104622CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Miklavcic D, Beravs K, Semrov D, Cemazar M, Demsar F, Sersa G. The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues.Biophys J. 1998; 74:2152–2158. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77924-XCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Miklavcic D, Semrov D, Mekid H, Mir LM. A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000; 1523:73–83. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(00)00101-xCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Howard B, Haines DE, Verma A, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Onal B, Stewart MT, Sigg DC. Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022; 15:e010127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127LinkGoogle Scholar
Nikolski VP, Efimov IR. Electroporation of the heart.Europace. 2005; 7:146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.04.011CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Nikolski VP, Sambelashvili AT, Krinsky VI, Efimov IR. Effects of electroporation on optically recorded transmembrane potential responses to high-intensity electrical shocks.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 286:H412–H418. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00689.2003CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Tung L, Sliz N, Mulligan MR. Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells.Circ Res. 1991; 69:722–730. doi: 10.1161/01.res.69.3.722LinkGoogle Scholar
Valic B, Golzio M, Pavlin M, Schatz A, Faurie C, Gabriel B, Teissie J, Rols MP, Miklavcic D. Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment.Eur Biophys J. 2003; 32:519–528. doi: 10.1007/s00249-003-0296-9CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Corovic S, Zupanic A, Kranjc S, Al Sakere B, Leroy-Willig A, Mir LM, Miklavcic D. The influence of skeletal muscle anisotropy on electroporation: in vivo study and numerical modeling.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010; 48:637–648. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0614-1CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira PX, Bassani RA, Bassani JW. Lethal effect of electric fields on isolated ventricular myocytes.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55:2635–2642. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2001135CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Knisley SB, Grant AO. Asymmetrical electrically induced injury of rabbit ventricular myocytes.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995; 27:1111–1122. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(95)90047-0CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Semenov I, Grigoryev S, Neuber JU, Zemlin CW, Pakhomova ON, Casciola M, Pakhomov AG. Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.Sci Rep. 2018; 8:8233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26521-2CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Dermol-Cerne J, Batista Napotnik T, Rebersek M, Miklavcic D. Short microsecond pulses achieve homogeneous electroporation of elongated biological cells irrespective of their orientation in electric field.Sci Rep. 2020; 10:9149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65830-3CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Hunter DW, Kostecki G, Fish JM, Jensen JA, Tandri H. In Vitro cell selectivity of reversible and irreversible: electroporation in cardiac tissue.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021; 14:e008817. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008817LinkGoogle Scholar
Yavin HD, Higuchi K, Sroubek J, Younis A, Zilberman I, Anter E. Pulsed-field ablation in ventricular myocardium using a focal catheter: the impact of application repetition on lesion dimensions.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021; 14:e010375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010375LinkGoogle Scholar
Yavin H, Shapira-Daniels A, Barkagan M, Sroubek J, Shim D, Melidone R, Anter E. Pulsed field ablation using a lattice electrode for focal energy delivery: biophysical characterization, lesion durability, and safety evaluation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13:e008580. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008580LinkGoogle Scholar
Haines DE. What is different about pulsed-field ablation... everything?.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33:368–370. doi: 10.1111/jce.15353CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Baykaner T, Fazal M, Verma A. Taking the “Pulse” of pulsed field ablation: real-world experience.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 33:357–359. doi: 10.1111/jce.15348CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Balouch M, Juang D, Sivasambu B, Bajwa RJ, Zghaib T, Chrispin J, Berger RD, Ashikaga H, Calkins H, Marine JE,. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection after ablation using contact-force sensing catheters: incidence, timing, and ablation lesion characteristics.J Atr Fibrillation. 2018; 11:2084. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2084CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Benoist D, Stones R, Drinkhill MJ, Benson AP, Yang Z, Cassan C, Gilbert SH, Saint DA, Cazorla O, Steele DS,. Cardiac arrhythmia mechanisms in rats with heart failure induced by pulmonary hypertension.Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012; 302:H2381–H2395. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01084.2011CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Fowler ED, Drinkhill MJ, Norman R, Pervolaraki E, Stones R, Steer E, Benoist D, Steele DS, Calaghan SC, White E. Beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist, metoprolol attenuates cardiac myocyte Ca(2+) handling dysfunction in rats with pulmonary artery hypertension.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018; 120:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.05.015CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Sweeney DC, Rebersek M, Dermol J, Rems L, Miklavcic D, Davalos RV. Quantification of cell membrane permeability induced by monopolar and high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses.Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1858:2689–2698. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.06.024CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Pieske B, Sutterlin M, Schmidt-Schweda S, Minami K, Meyer M, Olschewski M, Holubarsch C, Just H, Hasenfuss G. Diminished post-rest potentiation of contractile force in human dilated cardiomyopathy. Functional evidence for alterations in intracellular Ca2+ handling.J Clin Invest. 1996; 98:764–776. doi: 10.1172/JCI118849CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Potter H, Heller R. Transfection by electroporation.Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2018; 121:9.3.1–9.3.13. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov VV, Nikolski VP, Efimov IR. Effect of electroporation on cardiac electrophysiology.Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 423:433–448. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-194-9_34CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Eisner DA, Caldwell JL, Kistamas K, Trafford AW. Calcium and excitation-contraction coupling in the heart.Circ Res. 2017; 121:181–195. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310230LinkGoogle Scholar
Bers DM. Cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.Nature. 2002; 415:198–205. doi: 10.1038/415198aCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Andrews NW, Corrotte M. Plasma membrane repair.Curr Biol. 2018; 28:R392–R397. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.034CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Cooper ST, McNeil PL. Membrane repair: mechanisms and pathophysiology.Physiol Rev. 2015; 95:1205–1240. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2014CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Jimenez AJ, Perez F. Plasma membrane repair: the adaptable cell life-insurance.Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017; 47:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.03.011CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Polajzer T, Dermol-Cerne J, Rebersek M, O’Connor R, Miklavcic D. Cancellation effect is present in high-frequency reversible and irreversible electroporation.Bioelectrochemistry. 2020; 132:107442. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107442CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Vizintin A, Markovic S, Scancar J, Miklavcic D. Electroporation with nanosecond pulses and bleomycin or cisplatin results in efficient cell kill and low metal release from electrodes.Bioelectrochemistry. 2021; 140:107798. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107798CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Tovar O, Tung L. Electroporation and recovery of cardiac cell membrane with rectangular voltage pulses.Am J Physiol. 1992; 263:H1128–H1136. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1992.263.4.H1128CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Fast VG, Cheek ER, Pollard AE, Ideker RE. Effects of electrical shocks on Cai2+ and Vm in myocyte cultures.Circ Res. 2004; 94:1589–1597. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000132746.94360.8bLinkGoogle Scholar
Klauke N, Smith G, Cooper JM. Regional electroporation of single cardiac myocytes in a focused electric field.Anal Chem. 2010; 82:585–592. doi: 10.1021/ac901886jCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Prado LN, Goulart JT, Zoccoler M, Oliveira PX. Ventricular myocyte injury by high-intensity electric field: Effect of pulse duration.Gen Physiol Biophys. 2016; 35:121–130. doi: 10.4149/gpb_2015047CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Batista Napotnik T, Polajzer T, Miklavcic D. Cell death due to electroporation - A review.Bioelectrochemistry. 2021; 141:107871. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107871CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Davalos RV, Mir IL, Rubinsky B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation.Ann Biomed Eng. 2005; 33:223–231. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-8981-8CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Kotnik T, Kramar P, Pucihar G, Miklavcic D, Tarek M. Cell membrane electroporation-Part 1: the phenomenon.IEEE Electr Insul Mag. 2012; 28:14–23. doi: 10.1109/MEI.2012.6268438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuccitelli R, McDaniel A, Anand S, Cha J, Mallon Z, Berridge JC, Uecker D. Nano-Pulse Stimulation is a physical modality that can trigger immunogenic tumor cell death.J ImmunoTher Cancer. 2017; 5:32. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0234-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Polajzer T, Jarm T, Miklavcic D. Analysis of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules due to electroporation of cells in vitro.Radiol Oncol. 2020; 54:317–328. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0047CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Hu Q, Joshi RP. Analysis of intense, subnanosecond electrical pulse-induced transmembrane voltage in spheroidal cells with arbitrary orientation.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009; 56:1617–1626. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2015459CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Setterberg IE, Le C, Frisk M, Perdreau-Dahl H, Li J, Louch WE. Corrigendum: the physiology and pathophysiology of t-tubules in the heart.Front Physiol. 2021; 12:790227. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.790227CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Setterberg IE, Le C, Frisk M, Li J, Louch WE. The Physiology and pathophysiology of t-tubules in the heart.Front Physiol. 2021; 12:718404. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718404CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Pucihar G, Krmelj J, Rebersek M, Napotnik TB, Miklavcic D. Equivalent pulse parameters for electroporation.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011; 58:3279–3288. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2167232CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Mercadal B, Beitel-White N, Aycock KN, Castellvi Q, Davalos RV, Ivorra A. Dynamics of cell death after conventional ire and h-fire treatments.Ann Biomed Eng. 2020; 48:1451–1462. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02462-8CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Chiesi M, Wrzosek A, Grueninger S. The role of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in various types of cardiomyocytes.Mol Cell Biochem. 1994; 130:159–171. doi: 10.1007/BF01457397CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Wibo M, Bravo G, Godfraind T. Postnatal maturation of excitation-contraction coupling in rat ventricle in relation to the subcellular localization and surface density of 1,4-dihydropyridine and ryanodine receptors.Circ Res. 1991; 68:662–673. doi: 10.1161/01.res.68.3.662LinkGoogle Scholar