High-Frame-Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry Can Measure the High-Velocity Diastolic Flow Patterns
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Left ventricular flow patterns have been studied as potential early-stage markers of cardiac dysfunction.1 A relatively new method of measuring left ventricular flow patterns, named echo-particle image velocimetry (echoPIV), tracks the motion of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles in the blood using echocardiography. However, the low frame rates (50–70 Hz) permitted by the current generation of clinical ultrasound scanners cause velocity magnitudes to be severely underestimated during filling and ejection (<40 cm/s at 50 Hz).2 High-frame-rate (HFR) echocardiography, using diverging wave transmission schemes, has allowed for frame rates of ≤100× faster than conventional line-scanning echocardiography. The image quality improvements when using HFR contrast-enhanced ultrasound over conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound have recently been described.3 Still, measurement of the high-energy and high-velocity transmitral jet has yet to be demonstrated in humans. We have shown previously, in an in vitro left ventricular phantom study, that HFR echoPIV can accurately measure the high-energy diastolic flow patterns.4 In this work, we demonstrate that this holds true in a patient with heart failure.
A patient (19, woman, 1.65 m, 66 kg) with dilated cardiomyopathy and dual chamber pacing implantable cardioverter-defibrillators was admitted for decompensatio cordis. Apical 3-chamber views were obtained using both a clinical scanner (EPIQ 7 with X5-1 probe; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) and a research scanner (Vantage 256; Verasonics, Kirkland, WA) with a P4-1 probe (Philips Healthcare). Pulsed-wave Doppler measurements were obtained, using the clinical scanner, in the region of the mitral valve tips. Ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue; Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) was then continuously infused at 0.6 mL/min (VueJect BR-INF 100; Bracco Imaging SpA), and its arrival in the left ventricle was verified with the clinical scanner. The research scanner was then used to obtain HFR contrast-enhanced ultrasound acquisitions using a 2-angle (−7° and 7°) diverging wave sequence with 2-pulse contrast scheme (pulse inversion; mechanical index ≈0.06 to 0.01) at a pulse repetition frequency of 4900 Hz, resulting in an imaging frame rate of 1225 Hz. EchoPIV analysis was performed in the polar domain, using custom particle image velocimetry software that used correlation compounding on ensembles of 5 frames for each angle.4 The final vector-grid resolution was 1.25° by 1.25 mm. HFR echoPIV magnitudes were validated by comparing the mean temporal velocity profile to the pulsed-wave Doppler spectrum captured in the same location. This study was approved by Erasmus Medical Center Medical Ethics Committee (NL63755.078.18).
The velocities measured with HFR echoPIV agreed well with the pulsed-wave Doppler spectrum (Figure [A]), with peak velocities ≤80 cm/s measured in this patient. This is the first demonstration of echoPIV measuring the high velocities present in the transmitral jet in adults. The high temporal resolution also permits study of the flow patterns in greater detail (Movie I in the Data Supplement). For example, the large, central clockwise vortex was observed pinching off the transmitral jet before migrating apically (Figure [B through D], *). Smaller, more transient vortices were also observed, such as the counterclockwise vortex between the jet and the free wall (Figure [B], †).

We have demonstrated in a patient with heart failure that HFR echoPIV can measure the, previously unobtainable, high-velocity flow patterns in 2-dimensions. This development has potential to become a useful tool in the study of intraventricular blood flow and its relation with ventricular function.
Supplemental Material
References
1.
Sengupta PP, Pedrizzetti G, Kilner PJ, Kheradvar A, Ebbers T, Tonti G, Fraser AG, Narula J. Emerging trends in CV flow visualization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:305–316. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.003
2.
Prinz C, Faludi R, Walker A, Amzulescu M, Gao H, Uejima T, Fraser AG, Voigt JU. Can echocardiographic particle image velocimetry correctly detect motion patterns as they occur in blood inside heart chambers? A validation study using moving phantoms. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-24
3.
Toulemonde MEG, Corbett R, Papadopoulou V, Chahal N, Li Y, Leow CH, Cosgrove DO, Eckersley RJ, Duncan N, Senior R, Tang MX. High frame-rate contrast echocardiography: in-human demonstration. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:923–924. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.011
4.
Voorneveld J, Muralidharan A, Hope T, Vos HJ, Kruizinga P, van der Steen AFW, Gijsen FJH, Kenjeres S, de Jong N, Bosch JG. High frame rate ultrasound particle image velocimetry for estimating high velocity flow patterns in the left ventricle. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018;65:2222–2232. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2786340
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2019 American Heart Association, Inc.
History
Published in print: April 2019
Published online: 3 April 2019
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
Disclosures
None.
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by ZonMw (Innovative Medical Devices Initiative program [project Heart Failure and 4D Flow, number 104003001]), The Hague, the Netherlands.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Angle-Independent Blood Flow Velocity Measurement With Ultrasound Speckle Decorrelation Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 44, 5, (2283-2294), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2025.3529033
- Flow measurements in clinical cardiac imaging, Physical Review Fluids, 10, 2, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.10.020501
- Fabrication of Soft Transparent Patient‐Specific Vascular Models with Stereolithographic 3D printing and Thiol‐Based Photopolymerizable Coatings, Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 45, 6, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202300611
- Development of an in vitro setup for flow studies in a stented carotid artery bifurcation, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 62, 4, (1165-1176), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02977-x
- The role of innovative modeling and imaging techniques in improving outcomes in patients with LVAD, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1248300
- Effect of Particle Image Velocimetry processing on CT Dicom images in a deep learning based pipeline for lung nodule segmentation✱, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, (1-8), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1145/3571600.3571632
- On using a Particle Image Velocimetry based approach for candidate nodule detection, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 15, (22871-22888), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14493-z
- 粒子图像测速技术:从实验室到工业应用的进展(特邀), ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA, 52, 3, (0352103), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3788/gzxb20235203.0352103
- Microbubble Enhanced Echocardiography in Current Cardiology Practice, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23, 6, (2022).https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2306202
- Left ventricular high frame rate echo-particle image velocimetry: clinical application and comparison with conventional imaging, Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 20, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-022-00283-4
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.