Severe Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch: Compelling Entity or an Epiphenomenon of Low Flow?
Originally published13 Aug 2021https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.012836Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021;14:e012836
"Severe Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch: Compelling Entity or an Epiphenomenon of Low Flow?." Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 14(8), pp. –
Footnotes
References
- 1.
Head SJ, Mokhles MM, Osnabrugge RL, Pibarot P, Mack MJ, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP . The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years.Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:1518–1529. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.
Herrmann HC, Daneshvar SA, Fonarow GC, Stebbins A, Vemulapalli S, Desai ND, Malenka DJ, Thourani VH, Rymer J, Kosinski AS . Prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: from the STS/ACC TVT registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72:2701–2711. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.001CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.
Webb JG, Murdoch DJ, Alu MC, Cheung A, Crowley A, Dvir D, Herrmann HC, Kodali SK, Leipsic J, Miller DC, . 3-year outcomes after valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses: the PARTNER 2 registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73:2647–2655. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.483CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.
Okuno T, Khan F, Asami M, Praz F, Heg D, Winkel MG, Lanz J, Huber A, Gräni C, Räber L, . Prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with supra-annular and intra-annular prostheses.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12:2173–2182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.027CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.
Abbas AE, Pibarot P, Ke X, Alu MC, Rogers E, Hahn R, Leon MB, Thourani V . Impact of flow on prosthesis patient mismatch following transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 14:e012364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.012364LinkGoogle Scholar - 6.
Ternacle J, Guimaraes L, Vincent F, Côté N, Côté M, Lachance D, Clavel M-A, Abbas AE, Pibarot P, Rodés-Cabau J . Reclassification of prosthesis–patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 22:11–20. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa23CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.
Firstenberg MS, Abel EE, Papadimos TJ, Tripathi RS . Nonconvective forces: a critical and often ignored component in the echocardiographic assessment of transvalvular pressure gradients.Cardiol Res Pract. 2012; 2012:383217. doi: 10.1155/2012/383217CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.
Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G . “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 33:1655–1661. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00066-2CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Anjan VY, Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, Stewart WJ, Kapadia S, Tuzcu EM, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Szeto WY, Bavaria JE, . Evaluation of flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow aortic stenosis: a secondary analysis of the PARTNER randomized clinical trial.JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1:584–592. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0759CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.
Hahn RT, Leipsic J, Douglas PS, Jaber WA, Weissman NJ, Pibarot P, Blanke P, Oh JK . Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal transcatheter valve function.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.
Vamvakidou A, Jin W, Danylenko O, Pradhan J, Li W, West C, Khattar R, Senior R . Impact of pre-intervention transaortic flow rate versus stroke volume index on mortality across the hemodynamic spectrum of severe aortic stenosis: Implications for a new hemodynamic classification of aortic stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12:205–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.004CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar