Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With a Working Diagnosis of MINOCA—An Outcome Study With up to 10 Years of Follow-Up

Originally published15 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014454Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2023;16

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients with a working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) represent a heterogeneous cohort. The prognosis could vary substantially depending on the underlying cause. Although cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered a key diagnostic tool in these patients, there are limited data linking the CMR diagnosis with the outcome.

METHODS:

This study is a prospective outcomes registry of consecutive patients presenting with a working diagnosis of MINOCA who were clinically referred for CMR at an academic hospital from October 2003 to February 2020. We assessed the relationships between the prespecified CMR diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), myocarditis, nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), normal CMR study, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

RESULTS:

Of 252 patients, the CMR diagnosis was AMI in 63 (25%), myocarditis in 33 (13%), NICM in 111 (44%), normal CMR in 37 (15%), and other diagnoses in 8 (3%). A specific nonischemic cause was diagnosed allowing true MINOCA to be ruled-out in 57% of the cohort. During up to 10 years of follow-up (1595 patient-years), MACE occurred in 84 patients (33%), which included 64 deaths (25%). The unadjusted cumulative 10-year rate of MACE was 47% in AMI, 24% in myocarditis, 50% in NICM, and 3.5% in patients with a normal CMR (Log-rank P<0.001). The CMR diagnosis provided incremental prognostic value over clinical factors including age, gender, coronary artery disease risk factors, presentation with ST-elevation, and peak troponin (incremental χ² 17.9, P<0.001); and patients with diagnoses of AMI, myocarditis, and NICM had worse MACE-free survival than patients with a normal CMR.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA, CMR allows ruling-out true MINOCA in over half of the patients. CMR diagnoses of AMI, myocarditis, and NICM are associated with worse MACE-free survival, whereas a normal CMR study portends a benign prognosis.

Footnotes

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 641.

Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.014454.

Continuing medical education (CME) credit is available for this article. Go to http://cme.ahajournals.org to take the quiz.

Correspondence to: Raymond J. Kim, MD, Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, DUMC-3934, Durham, NC 27710. Email

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Agewall S, Beltrame JF, Reynolds HR, Niessner A, Rosano G, Caforio AL, De Caterina R, Zimarino M, Roffi M, Kjeldsen K, et al; WG on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. ESC working group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:143–153. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw149CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, Agewall S, Brilakis ES, Brown TM, Lerman A, Cushman M, Kumbhani DJ, Arslanian-Engoren C, et al; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Contemporary diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2019; 139:e891–e908. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000670LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Crea F, Montone RA, Niccoli G. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: dealing with pears and apples.Eur Heart J. 2020; 41:879–881. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz561CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Pathik B, Raman B, Mohd Amin NH, Mahadavan D, Rajendran S, McGavigan AD, Grover S, Smith E, Mazhar J, Bridgman C, et al. Troponin-positive chest pain with unobstructed coronary arteries: incremental diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 17:1146–1152. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev289CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Emrich T, Emrich K, Abegunewardene N, Oberholzer K, Dueber C, Muenzel T, Kreitner K-F. Cardiac MR enables diagnosis in 90% of patients with acute chest pain, elevated biomarkers and unobstructed coronary arteries.Br J Radiol. 2015; 88:20150025. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150025CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Vágó H, Szabó L, Dohy Z, Czimbalmos C, Tóth A, Suhai FI, Bárczi G, Gyarmathy VA, Becker D, Merkely B. Early cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in troponin-positive acute chest pain and non-obstructed coronary arteries.Heart. 2020; 106:992–1000. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316295CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Dastidar AG, Baritussio A, De Garate E, Drobni Z, Biglino G, Singhal P, Milano EG, Angelini GD, Dorman S, Strange J, et al. Prognostic role of CMR and conventional risk factors in myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12:1973–1982. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.023CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Gerbaud E, Harcaut E, Coste P, Erickson M, Lederlin M, Labèque JN, Perron JM, Cochet H, Dos Santos P, Durrieu-Jaïs C, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 28:783–794. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9879-1CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Chopard R, Jehl J, Dutheil J, Genon VD, Seronde MF, Kastler B, Schiele F, Meneveau N. Evolution of acute coronary syndrome with normal coronary arteries and normal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011; 104:509–517. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.004CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Caforio AL, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno-Blanes J, Felix SB, Fu M, Heliö T, Heymans S, Jahns R, et al; European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases.Eur Heart J. 2013; 34:2636–48, 2648a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht210CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020; 22:17. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Shah DJ, Klem I, Crowley AL, Brosnan R, James OG, Patel MR, Heitner J, Parker M, et al. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.041CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Klem I, Weinsaft JW, Bahnson TD, Hegland D, Kim HW, Hayes B, Parker MA, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Assessment of myocardial scarring improves risk stratification in patients evaluated for cardiac defibrillator implantation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60:408–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.070CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Klem I, Heiberg E, Van Assche L, Parker MA, Kim HW, Grizzard JD, Arheden H, Kim RJ. Sources of variability in quantification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance infarct size - reproducibility among three core laboratories.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017; 19:62. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0378-yCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Heitner JF, Senthilkumar A, Harrison JK, Klem I, Sketch MH, Ivanov A, Hamo C, Van Assche L, White J, Washam J, et al. Identifying the infarct-related artery in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12:e007305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, et al; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.Circulation. 2012; 126:2020–2035. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Heitner JF, Kim RJ, Kim HW, Klem I, Shah DJ, Debs D, Farzaneh-Far A, Polsani V, Kim J, Weinsaft J, et al. Prognostic value of vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter study with 48 000 patient-years of follow-up.JAMA Cardiol. 2019; 4:256–264. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0035CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Beltrame JF. Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries.Circulation. 2015; 131:861–870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Pelliccia F, Pasceri V, Patti G, Tanzilli G, Speciale G, Gaudio C, Camici PG. Long-term prognosis and outcome predictors in takotsubo syndrome: a systematic review and meta-regression study.JACC Heart Fail. 2019; 7:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.10.009CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Templin C, Ghadri JR, Diekmann J, Napp LC, Bataiosu DR, Jaguszewski M, Cammann VL, Sarcon A, Geyer V, Neumann CA, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy.N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:929–938. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406761CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Vicente-Ibarra N, Feliu E, Bertomeu-Martínez V, Cano-Vivar P, Carrillo-Sáez P, Morillas P, Ruiz-Nodar JM. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021; 23:83. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00773-wCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Ammirati E, Cipriani M, Moro C, Raineri C, Pini D, Sormani P, Mantovani R, Varrenti M, Pedrotti P, Conca C, et al; Registro Lombardo delle Miocarditi. Clinical presentation and outcome in a contemporary cohort of patients with acute myocarditis: multicenter lombardy registry.Circulation. 2018; 138:1088–1099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035319LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Erbel R, Möhlenkamp S, Moebus S, Schmermund A, Lehmann N, Stang A, Dragano N, Grönemeyer D, Seibel R, Kälsch H, et al; Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study Investigative Group. Coronary risk stratification, discrimination, and reclassification improvement based on quantification of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56:1397–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.030CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, McClelland RL, Detrano R, Wong N, Blumenthal RS, Kondos G, Kronmal RA. Coronary calcium predicts events better with absolute calcium scores than age-sex-race/ethnicity percentiles: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.072CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36:959–969. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00804-4CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Reynolds HR, Maehara A, Kwong RY, Sedlak T, Saw J, Smilowitz NR, Mahmud E, Wei J, Marzo K, Matsumura M, et al. Coronary optical coherence tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine underlying causes of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries in women.Circulation. 2021; 143:624–640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052008LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Kim RJ. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies.Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:1461–1474. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi258CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
Back to top

Submit a Response to This Article

Compose eLetter

Contributors

(all fields are required)

Statement of Competing Interests

Cancel