Skip main navigation
×

Prevalence and Management of Symptoms Associated With Statin Therapy in Community Practice

Insights From the PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) Registry
Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004249Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2018;11:e004249

    Introduction

    When compared against placebo in randomized trials, statins are extremely well tolerated, causing muscle-related side effects in 1% or fewer of treated patients.1 Yet in routine practice, patients often report having symptoms which are misattributed to their statin.24 Using data from the PALM Registry, we examined patient-reported rates of statin intolerance, characteristics of patients with perceived side effects, and response to perceived statin intolerance in contemporary practice.

    Methods and Results

    The data, analytic methods, and study materials will not be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results. The PALM Registry enrolled 7938 patients from 140 primary care, cardiology, and endocrinology practices in the United States (May 27, 2015 to November 12, 2015) and has been described in detail.5 Trained study coordinators identified eligible patients (patients on a statin, at risk for cardiovascular disease [CVD], or with prevalent CVD, in the Data Supplement) at the time of their visit, who were then sequentially enrolled. Of 9788 eligible patients, n=7937 (81%) consented and enrolled in the study. Patients were then surveyed on statin use, perceived statin-related symptoms and response to symptoms, beliefs about statins and CVD, and sociodemographic characteristics (response rate 95.3%, in the Data Supplement).

    Clinical characteristics and medications were abstracted from the medical record by study coordinators. All patients had core laboratory lipid levels (LabCorp, Burlington, NC). Categorical variables were compared with Mantel–Haenszel χ2 tests and continuous variables using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate factors associated with symptoms using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering within site, with backward model selection at P<0.05 for variable retention. Candidate variables were chosen based on either associations with statin use (eg, demographics, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease history, education, and insurance) or prior associations with statin intolerance (eg, thyroid disease and body mass index). Continuous variables were modeled using splines to account for nonlinearity. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC). All participants provided signed informed consent. Each site obtained institutional review board approval for participation.

    Frequency and Types of Statin-Associated Symptoms

    Among 7563 patients, 5916 (78.2%) reported ever using a statin (5316 current, 600 former). Among former users, the time since the last statin use was <1 month for 13%, 1 month to <1 year for 29%, 1 to 5 years for 33%, and >5 years for 17%. Overall, 2600 reported at least 1 symptom while on statin therapy, including 41.8% of current users and 63.2% of prior users. The most commonly reported symptoms were muscle aches/cramps (29% current, 51% former), fatigue (14% current, 20% former), and weakness (10% current, 20% former). Memory loss was reported by 10% of current and 9% of prior statin users, followed by constipation (9% current, 8% former), nausea (5% current, 8% former), hives/itching (3% current, 5% former), and other (1% current, 2% former).

    Factors Associated With Symptoms

    Table shows the characteristics of patients with and without self-reported statin-associated symptoms. In multivariable modeling among current statin users, female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–1.55), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.15–1.43), increasing body mass index (OR, 1.22 per 5 increase up to 30; 95% CI, 1.09–1.37), decreasing age (OR, 1.04 per 5-year decrease; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07), thyroid disease (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06–1.40), higher education (at least some college versus none; OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03–1.33), and diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00–1.27) were associated with increased odds of reporting symptoms. Among former statin users, non-Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.42–3.49), increasing body mass index (OR, 1.22 per 5 increase; 95% CI, 1.05–1.42), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.07–2.21), and female sex (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.05–2.00) were associated with increasing odds of reporting symptoms.

    Table. Characteristics of Adults With and Without Symptoms While on a Statin

    Current Statin UsersFormer Statin Users
    At Least 1 Symptom, n=2221No Symptoms, n=3095P ValueAt Least 1 Symptom, n=379No Symptoms, n=221P Value
    Age67.0 (60.0–74.0)68.0 (60.0–75.0)0.00769.0 (61.0–76.0)68.0 (58.0–76.0)0.21
    Female47.4%41.0%<0.000160.7%52.5%0.050
    Race
     White84.9%86.3%0.5287.6%85.0%0.50
     Black/African American12.7%11.6%11.1%12.7%
     Asian2.1%1.8%1.3%1.8%
     Other0.3%0.2%0.0%0.5%
    Ethnicity
     Hispanic/Latino9.1%12.2%0.00048.5%17.8%0.0007
    Insurance
     Private58.5%58.5%0.9455.0%55.5%0.16
     Government39.8%39.7%41.8%38.2%
     Other (non-US)/none1.8%1.8%3.2%6.4%
    Highest level of education
    At least some college66.2%61.3%0.000365.8%67.7%0.63
    Obese (BMI ≥30)52.1%46.2%<0.000154.8%42.2%0.003
    Systolic BP (mm Hg)128.0 (118.0–140.0)128.0 (118.0–138.0)0.04130.0 (120.0–140.0)130.0 (120.0–140.0)0.41
    Diastolic BP (mm Hg)76.0 (70.0–80.0)76.0 (70.0–80.0)0.5875.0 (70.0–82.0)76.0 (70.0–80.0)0.79
    High-intensity statin30.3%28.2%0.11
    Current nonstatin LLT27.4%25.0%0.04930.5%22.0%0.026
    CAD42.1%38.1%0.00435.6%27.3%0.036
    Peripheral arterial disease8.0%7.6%0.637.9%5.0%0.17
    Prior stroke or TIA8.2%6.9%0.067.7%6.8%0.71
    Diabetes mellitus44.6%39.2%<0.000138.3%37.3%0.81
    Hypertension80.8%80.9%0.8978.1%73.2%0.17
    Current smoker10.3%11.7%0.119.5%10.0%0.84
    History of elevated liver function tests3.2%2.9%0.584.5%5.0%0.78
    History of myopathy4.2%3.0%0.037.4%4.6%0.17
    Thyroid disease18.0%14.7%0.00119.6%17.4%0.50
    Dialysis or CKD10.2%10.2%0.9110.6%12.7%0.42
    LDL-C89.0 (72.0–111.0)86.0 (69.0–107.0)0.0005139.0 (115.0–165.0)128.0 (100.0–152.0)0.0003
    Statins are effective, % agree to strongly agree72.4%79.7%<0.000153.8%58.1%0.10
    Statins are safe, % agree to strongly agree49.3%66.5%<0.000122.3%43.9%<0.0001
    Statins cause liver damage, % agree to strongly agree38.7%27.8%<0.000144.0%30.8%<0.0001
    Statins cause muscle aches, % agree to strongly agree62.2%28.9%<0.000180.4%28.9%<0.0001
    Statins cause memory loss, % agree to strongly agree21.2%8.8%<0.000123.0%6.7%<0.0001
    How often do you worry about heart attack or stroke?
     % often or occasionally44.7%32.6%<0.000151.5%41.5%0.022
    How much do you trust your doctor with decisions about your medical care?
     % completely61.8%69.4%<0.000156.8%62.2%0.19

    High-intensity statin defined as atorvastatin ≥40 mg, rosuvastatin ≥20 mg. Statin intensity not assessed in former statin users. Categorical variables presented as median (25th–75th percentile). BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LLT, lipid-lowering therapy; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.

    Those with symptoms reported lower beliefs in statin efficacy and safety and were less likely to report completely trusting their doctor (Table). Symptomatic patients reported increased worry about CVD compared with those without symptoms.

    Statin Intensity and LDL-C Levels in Current Statin Users

    Among current statin users, there was no difference in the rate of high-intensity statin use by symptom reporting (30.3% with symptoms versus 28.2% without; P=0.11), but those with symptoms were slightly more likely to be taking nonstatin lipid-lowering therapy (27.4% versus 25.0%; P=0.049). LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) levels were higher among those with symptoms compared with those without (median, 89.0 versus 86.0 mg/dL; P<0.001).

    Response to Symptoms

    Most patients (50.8% overall) tried at least 1 intervention to stay on statin therapy. Among current statin users, 57.0% of symptomatic patients reported not taking any action to treat the symptom, 24.0% switched statins, 11.3% stopped then rechallenged with the same statin, 12.2% reduced the dose, 8.1% added an additional medication, 5.5% reduced statin frequency, and 2.8% reduced exercise. Among symptomatic former statin users, 25.9% reported no intervention, 33.4% switched statins, 39.1% stopped then rechallenged, 19.1% reduced the dose, 11.1% added an additional medication, 10.9% reduced statin frequency, and 2.6% reduced exercise.

    Impact on Medication Persistence

    Adverse effects were the leading reason for discontinuing therapy (51.2% of former users discontinued because of side effects). Willingness to retry a statin among those who discontinued because of symptoms was high; 26.8% reported they would not at all be willing to retry a statin, 17.8% were unlikely, 23.1% possibly, 18.2% were very likely, and 11.5% reported they would almost certainly retry a statin.

    Comment

    Despite data from randomized trials supporting the safety of statin therapy and very low rates of excess muscle-related complaints when statins are compared with placebo, very high numbers of adults who take statins continue to report statin-associated symptoms. In our study of adults currently or formerly on statin therapy in routine clinical practice, 41.8% of current and 63.2% of former statin users report at least 1 symptom on statin therapy. This is consistent with prior observational studies, with rates of muscle-related complaints ranging from 10% to 69% in different analyses.3,6

    Groups most likely to report symptoms included women and those with diabetes mellitus or thyroid disease, consistent with other studies.6 Patients with coronary artery disease and those with higher levels of education were also more likely to report symptoms. Symptomatic patients felt less sure that statins were efficacious and were less likely to report completely trusting their doctor.

    Our study does not establish causation between statin use and symptoms. In clinical trials, statins have not been shown to cause any of the symptoms that participants were asked about except for muscle-related symptoms. Further, the rates of muscle-related symptoms seen in PALM exceed that shown in trials.4 This suggests that patients are likely misattributing symptoms with a high background incidence to their statin. Furthermore, patients with negative expectations about statin adverse effects may be more likely to experience them (the nocebo effect).7 Adults who reported symptoms on statins were more likely to worry about CVD, potentially reflecting a higher level of health-related anxiety. Whether real or not, perceived statin-related symptoms often led patients to discontinue therapy. Our data offer hope for improving statin utilization. Many adults with symptoms successfully continued statin therapy, and nearly half of former users were willing to retry a statin. This is consistent with previous studies showing that many who discontinue statin therapy can tolerate rechallenge.8,9 Although current guidelines recommend that patients presenting with symptoms be rechallenged to establish causation before switching to an alternate statin,10 patients who continued on therapy were more likely to report switching to another statin or changing the dose. In contrast, rechallenge was more common among those who ultimately stopped therapy. Optimal strategies to identify true versus perceived statin intolerance while balancing patient preferences remain unclear.

    Limitations

    First, patients were queried about symptoms rather than side effects while on a statin. The patient survey was intentionally designed this to prevent patients from inferring causation between statins and all the symptoms listed, which included symptoms that are not known to be associated with statins. Second, our analysis of the interventions that were tried after symptom onset was based on patient report, which may be subject to recall bias. Third, only current therapy was confirmed by chart review, not prior therapy. Fourth, participants who volunteered for PALM may have been more likely to have stronger opinions about statins than the general population, because of volunteer bias. Finally, though the survey was pilot tested during development, formal reliability and validity testing was not performed.

    Conclusions

    In community practice, more than half of adults formerly or currently on statins reported symptoms while on statin therapy, which was the leading cause of statin discontinuation. Given the preponderance of evidence about statin safety from randomized trials, much of this is likely because of misattribution of background symptoms to statins. Even among those on statins, those with symptoms had higher LDL-C levels, potentially reflecting lower adherence. Those reporting symptoms also had less belief in statin efficacy and safety and less trust in their doctors. Although many patients did not attempt rechallenge, the majority of adults who discontinued statins because of side effects were willing to be rechallenged. These data underscore the magnitude of perceived statin-associated symptoms in community practice and support the need for more robust intervention strategies to address both real and perceived symptoms of statin therapy.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Erin Campbell, MS, for her editorial contributions to this article. Ms. Campbell did not receive compensation for her assistance, apart from her employment at the institution where this study was conducted.

    Footnotes

    The Data Supplement is available at http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004249/-/DC1.

    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes is available at http://circoutcomes.ahajournals.org.

    Correspondence to: Ann Marie Navar, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt St, No. 7521, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail

    References

    • 1. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Blumenthal R, Danesh J, Smith GD, DeMets D, Evans S, Law M, MacMahon S, Martin S, Neal B, Poulter N, Preiss D, Ridker P, Roberts I, Rodgers A, Sandercock P, Schulz K, Sever P, Simes J, Smeeth L, Wald N, Yusuf S, Peto R. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.Lancet. 2016; 388:2532–2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Buettner C, Davis RB, Leveille SG, Mittleman MA, Mukamal KJ. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and statin use.J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23:1182–1186. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0636-7.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Wei MY, Ito MK, Cohen JD, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA. Predictors of statin adherence, switching, and discontinuation in the USAGE survey: understanding the use of statins in America and gaps in patient education.J Clin Lipidol. 2013; 7:472–483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.03.001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Desai CS, Martin SS, Blumenthal RS. Non-cardiovascular effects associated with statins.BMJ. 2014; 349:g3743. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3743.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Navar AM, Wang TY, Goldberg AC, Robinson JG, Roger VL, Wilson PF, Virani SS, Elassal J, Lee LV, Webb LE, Peterson E. Design and rationale for the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) registry.Am Heart J. 2015; 170:865–871. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.002.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Bégaud B. Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients–the PRIMO study.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005; 19:403–414. doi: 10.1007/s10557-005-5686-z.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Tobert JA, Newman CB. The nocebo effect in the context of statin intolerance.J Clin Lipidol. 2016; 10:739–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.05.002.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Brindle P, Hippisley-Cox J. Discontinuation and restarting in patients on statin treatment: prospective open cohort study using a primary care database.BMJ. 2016; 353:i3305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3305.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Moriarty PM, Thompson PD, Cannon CP, Guyton JR, Bergeron J, Zieve FJ, Bruckert E, Jacobson TA, Kopecky SL, Baccara-Dinet MT, Du Y, Pordy R, Gipe DA; ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE Investigators. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: the ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial.J Clin Lipidol. 2015; 9:758–769. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.08.006.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC, Watson K, Wilson PW, Eddleman KM, Jarrett NM, LaBresh K, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC, Tomaselli GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Circulation. 2014; 129(25 suppl 2):S1–S45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.LinkGoogle Scholar