PATJ Low Frequency Variants Are Associated With Worse Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome: A Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis
VIEW EDITORIAL:Genetics of Recovery After Stroke
Abstract
Rationale:
Ischemic stroke is among the leading causes of adult disability. Part of the variability in functional outcome after stroke has been attributed to genetic factors but no locus has been consistently associated with stroke outcome.
Objective:
Our aim was to identify genetic loci influencing the recovery process using accurate phenotyping to produce the largest GWAS (genome-wide association study) in ischemic stroke recovery to date.
Methods and Results:
A 12-cohort, 2-phase (discovery-replication and joint) meta-analysis of GWAS included anterior-territory and previously independent ischemic stroke cases. Functional outcome was recorded using 3-month modified Rankin Scale. Analyses were adjusted for confounders such as discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. A gene-based burden test was performed. The discovery phase (n=1225) was followed by open (n=2482) and stringent joint-analyses (n=1791). Those cohorts with modified Rankin Scale recorded at time points other than 3-month or incomplete data on previous functional status were excluded in the stringent analyses. Novel variants in PATJ (Pals1-associated tight junction) gene were associated with worse functional outcome at 3-month after stroke. The top variant was rs76221407 (G allele, β=0.40, P=1.70×10−9).
Conclusions:
Our results identify a set of common variants in PATJ gene associated with 3-month functional outcome at genome-wide significance level. Future studies should examine the role of PATJ in stroke recovery and consider stringent phenotyping to enrich the information captured to unveil additional stroke outcome loci.
Introduction
Ischemic stroke (IS) is the leading cause of adult disability1 and the second cause of death worldwide.2 Approximately 15 million people per year have a stroke, 5 million results in long-term disability.3 More than a thousand potential targets for neuronal recovery have been identified,4 although few have been tested in clinical trials. As no trials had positive results it is of high priority to find new drug targets for clinical practice.
Editorial, see p 18
In This Issue, see p 2
Meet the First Author, see p 3
Functional outcome after IS varies between individuals irrespective of clinical factors as initial stroke severity, stroke subtype, and vascular risk factors.5 Multiple metabolic pathways are important in the response to cerebral ischemic damage and their activity may be modulated by variation in the genes of the involved components. New synaptic connections have been observed in areas surrounding a cerebral infarct within days after a stroke and this response is correlated with functional recovery.6
It is reasonable to presume that genetic variation may influence stroke recovery.7 Candidate-gene studies reported the association between several genes and disability after stroke, but no locus has been found through a hypothesis-free genome-wide approach and most of the reported candidates failed to replicate in other cohorts.8
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) contributing with a small effect to the risk of complex diseases, and different genes have arisen as potential therapeutic targets to reduce the risk of stroke.9,10 Studying the genetic component of stroke outcome is of great scientific interest but requires very accurate phenotyping and proper attention to potentially confounding factors that may hide the true genetic contribution.
We aimed to find the genetics influencing the stroke recovery process in a dataset of first-ever IS patients, using highly accurate phenotyping and producing the largest GWAS in stroke mid-term functional outcome to date to identify new potential drug targets.
Methods
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Detailed Methods are provided in the online-only Data Supplement.
Study Design
We conducted a 2-phase analysis; discovery-replication and joint association of IS cases. The discovery consisted of a meta-analysis of 4 GWAS. The replication was performed as an in silico analysis of the top SNPs (P<1×10−5) identified in the discovery. Two final joint meta-analyses according to open or stringent criteria were performed. The open joint meta-analysis (n=2482) included 4 discovery and 8 replication cohorts and the stringent joint meta-analysis (n=1791) 4 discovery and 3 replication cohorts. This joint approach has proved to be more efficient than discovery-replication alone in increasing the statistical power.11 A gene-based burden test was conducted.
Study Sample
European ancestry patients with a diagnosis of IS according to World Health Organization criteria were selected from the Spanish Stroke Genetics Consortium (GeneStroke) and the International Stroke Genetics Consortium.
Genome-Wide Association Study
After GWAS quality controls and imputation, association analyses with 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were performed using an additive model and a multivariate linear regression. The common variants between the individual GWAS were joined into weighted z-score meta-analyses for 3-month mRS. All the SNPs with P<5×10−8 were considered statistically significant for a genome-wide approach.
Results
Genome-Wide Association Study
GWAS—Discovery Phase
We meta-analyzed 4 individual GWAS with 1225 individuals and 4 480 015 SNPs in the discovery phase. In the bivariate analysis (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement), 3-month mRS showed association with age at stroke onset, sex, smoking status, stroke subtype by Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment,12 and discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The results include 79 variants in 18 independent (r2<0·001) genomic regions associated with impaired 3-month mRS at P<1×10−5 (Figure 1; Table III in the online-only Data Supplement), selected for replication. Global genomic inflation was λ=1032. Best evidence was for 3 SNPs in PATJ (Pals1-associated tight junction) on chromosome 1 exceeding P<5×10−8: rs76221407 (P=1.087×10−8, β=0.42); rs150862264 (P=1.539×10−8, β=0.41); and rs182008837 (P=1.825×10−8, β=0.40). The top variant was imputed with r2=89.9% and imputation certainty=99.2%.

GWAS—Replication Phase
The SNPs selected for replication were analyzed in 8 cohorts (Table IV in the online-only Data Supplement). The stringent replication meta-analysis with 3 cohorts that strictly fulfill our selection criteria showed 5 SNPs in PATJ nominally associated with 3-month mRS (P<0.05), including the 3 top SNPs from the discovery (Table V in the online-only Data Supplement). The effect size in the replication is slightly lower than in the discovery, indicating widespread consistency of results among the cohorts.
GWAS—Joint
A stringent joint meta-analysis was performed with the 4 discovery and the 3 stringent replication cohorts (1791 individuals). The analysis revealed strong genetic association between 18 low-frequency SNPs in PATJ and worse 3-month mRS (Table). The most striking SNP was rs76221407 (P=1.72×10−9, β=0.40), as shown in the forest plot (Figure IV in the online-only Data Supplement), driven by a variant with low frequency (3%) in our European ancestry cohorts (which is consistent with 1 kg data). Figure 2 shows the percentage of patients per group of 3-month mRS depending on the presence of the risk allele.
SNP | Position | Gene | SNP Type | MA | MAF | β | β (80% power) | SE | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs76221407 | 1:62131826 | PATJ | intronic | G | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 1.72×10−9 |
rs150862264 | 1:62132045 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.03 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.07 | 1.76×10−9 |
rs182008837 | 1:62107102 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.03 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 2.93×10−9 |
rs117335978 | 1:62140649 | PATJ | intronic | T | 0.02 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.08 | 1.96×10−8 |
rs137999692 | 1:62092932 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.03 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 2.98×10−8 |
rs75717958 | 1:62141064 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.71×10−8 |
rs7546744 | 1:62141462 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.71×10−8 |
rs7513982 | 1:62141944 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.72×10−8 |
rs17123133 | 1:62142178 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.72×10−8 |
rs7514107 | 1:62142096 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.72×10−8 |
rs141479296 | 1:62140561 | PATJ | intronic | G | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.77×10−8 |
rs11805802 | 1:62142912 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.78×10−8 |
rs10157504 | 1:62140248 | PATJ | intronic | G | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 3.80×10−8 |
rs74469018 | 1:62144275 | PATJ | intronic | T | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 3.86×10−8 |
rs77007585 | 1:62144350 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 3.88×10−8 |
rs11806656 | 1:62144566 | PATJ | intronic | C | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 3.88×10−8 |
rs7542598 | 1:62145477 | PATJ | intronic | T | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 3.95×10−8 |
rs118168181 | 1:62141702 | PATJ | intronic | A | 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.09 | 3.98×10−8 |
β, β-value for the association; β (80% power), β that could be detected as statistically significant under 80% power; Position, chromosome: genomic coordinates according to human genome reference version 19 (build GRCh38/hg38). MA indicates minor allele; MAF, minor allele frequency; and SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

An open joint meta-analysis was performed with all 12 cohorts (2482 individuals) independently of meeting criteria for stringent analysis. Results revealed less significant P values than the stringent analysis (rs76221407, P=1.3×10−8, β=0.37; Figure 3; Table VI and Figure V in the online-only Data Supplement). The percentage of the phenotypic variation in 3-month mRS accounted by the lead SNP is 0.27% in the whole sample (12 cohorts).

The same analyses through an ordinal regression showed loss of statistical power (stringent, P=3.60×10−5; open, P=4.33×10−5). Evidence of the robustness of the genetic association presented in this work is clearly shown in Figure 3, where the top SNP has a consistent effect direction in 11 out of 12 cohorts.
Gene-Based Study
The gene-based association test revealed the PATJ gene as significantly associated with 3-month mRS. The 4.48 million genetic variants from the discovery GWAS were clustered in 23 972 genes, of which the only significant gene was PATJ (P=1.99×10−6) (Table VII in the online-only Data Supplement). Significance threshold was set at P<0.05/23 972=2.086×10−6.
Discussion
We report the first genetic findings in IS outcome using a GWAS. Our results show a novel association between low-frequency genetic variants in PATJ gene and worse IS functional outcome measured with 3-month mRS. Genetic studies on IS outcome had previously focused on candidate loci (see Lindgren and Maguire).7 However, findings had shown contradictory results and failed in consistent replications.8 We performed a meta-analysis of 12 independent cohorts within the International Stroke Genetics Consortium, applying open and stringent criteria. Several low-frequency variants in PATJ were significantly associated with worse functional outcome at 3 months. The lead variant, rs76221407, presents a consistent effect direction in 11 of 12 cohorts, providing convincing evidence of its robust genetic association with stroke outcome. The SNP is located in an intronic region of PATJ and shows linkage disequilibrium with 17 other variants found through the stringent joint meta-analysis (r2>0.3, in 1000 Genomes Project for European ancestry individuals). The fact that the variants are intronic may suggest that its effect on protein synthesis is carried out through the regulation of gene expression, similar to other common variants identified by GWAS that are linked to diseases by their modulation of the activity of DNA regulatory elements.13 No previously established risk locus for stroke10 has been related to stroke outcome in this work. Considering our restrictive inclusion criteria, which widely differ from the case/control studies, it is reasonable that we do not find overlaps in the top SNPs. None of our significant variants have been associated with another phenotype yet, although other PATJ polymorphisms have been related to sleep disturbance14 and obesity-related traits.15
The results show a positive effect (β=0.4) for the G allele of rs76221407, indicating that an increase of 0.4 points in the mRS score is attributed to each copy of G allele (GG>GA>AA). This means that G allele is related to poor functional outcome at 3-month. The results from the gene-based test also revealed significance for this locus (P=1.99×10−6) pointing out PATJ as a hot region of accumulated contributing variants. Although our PATJ SNPs are low frequency (≈3%), the power of the association is strong enough to persist in the replication, evidencing the consistency of the results presented and the suitability of this gene as a therapeutic target.
PATJ, also known as INADL (inactivation-no-afterpotential D-like), localized at tight junctions and at the apical membrane of epithelial cells, encodes a protein with 7 PDZ domains, interaction modules that regulate multiple biological processes like ion channel signaling and transport.
To study the genetic component of a complex trait as IS functional outcome, it is key to be precise in characterizing the phenotype. The exclusion of posterior and lacunar strokes was considered necessary because these locations show a poor correlation between infarct size and clinical symptoms, and thus functional outcome.16 A small lesion can be asymptomatic or show very severe symptoms with great disability depending on a variation of just few millimeters in its location. In these cases, recovery processes and tissue regeneration mechanisms could be masked by this random location effect.
Minor strokes (initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≤4) and individuals with a dependent status previous to the stroke event (mRS score of >2) were also excluded. This was done to permit the analyses of an equivalent recovery process, without taking into consideration the degree of disability before stroke or those patients with only minimal damage to be recovered. In both cases, it would be difficult to evaluate the significance of recovery at 3-month. The achievement of a highly homogeneous sample was one of the main priorities during the study design. This led to the performance of 2 types of joint meta-analyses. The more permissive inclusion criteria of the open analysis led to a larger sample size (1.5× greater) but less significant results compared with the stringent analysis. The reduction of phenotypic heterogeneity by properly defining the study cohort increases statistical power.17 While the phenotypic homogeneity of the sample is the main strength of our study, it also limited the sample size, as very few cohorts worldwide have the complete data needed for the stringent analysis8 and this may prevent the discovery of other loci. However, our work demonstrates the value of prioritizing homogeneity and phenotyping accuracy over a larger sample size. The mRS, the most widely used scale in stroke patients to assess functional outcome, has only 7 categories but it offers the advantages of being easy to apply and having good inter-observer reproducibility.18 Analyzing the mRS score as a continuous instead of an ordinal value,19 according to Rhemtulla et al,20 is the preferable choice for ordinal data with >4 categories in contrast to robust categorical methodology, and the statistical power is improved.
This project generated extensive genotyping and phenotyping of individual-level data that can help to disentangle the genetic architecture of the stroke recovery process. The use of whole exome or genome sequencing would provide information about rare variants, which may account for a greater proportion of the stroke outcome’s genetic component than common variants. Additional functional studies are warranted to establish whether PATJ can reveal biological pathways that could be novel therapeutic targets to improve post-IS rehabilitation strategies.
Novelty and Significance
VIEW EDITORIAL:Genetics of Recovery After Stroke
•
Disability because of stroke has a significant impact on public health as it affects the quality of life of both—the patients and the caregivers.
•
Irrespective of clinical factors, functional recovery after ischemic stroke (IS) varies widely among individuals.
•
Variability in functional outcome has been attributed, in part, to genetic factors, but to date, no locus has been consistently associated with stroke outcome.
•
Genetic variants in PATJ gene are associated with IS functional outcome at 3 months.
•
Association of PATJ gene variants with IS functional outcome was discovered through a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies and was validated in a multiple-cohort replication study.
Cerebrovascular disease is the leading cause of adult disability. Mid-term functional recovery after stroke varies significantly among individuals, independent of infarct size, stroke subtype, vascular risk factors, or clinical status after acute treatment. Identifying genetic factors that contribute to this variability requires a hypothesis-free, comprehensive genotyping approach, such as genome-wide association studies, as well as accurate phenotyping to identify confounding factors that may obscure the genetic effects. Using a restrictive inclusion criteria to obtain a less heterogeneous patient population, in a multi-cohort genome-wide association studies we found that PATJ gene variants were associated with functional outcomes in patients with IS. The accumulation of risk alleles in the PATJ gene was associated with a worse functional outcome at 3-month after IS. This evidence for a genetic contribution to mid-term stroke prognosis provides a new platform for understanding the mechanisms that determine functional recovery after stroke, and may also help in better prediction of functional outcomes after IS.
Footnote
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- GWAS
- genome-wide association study
- IS
- ischemic stroke
- mRS
- modified Rankin Scale
- SNPs
- single nucleotide polymorphisms
Supplemental Material
Appendix
From the Department of Neurology, Neurovascular Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/DCEXS-Universitat Pompeu Fabra (M.M.-C., C.S.-T., E.G.-S., A.R.-C., A.O., E.C.-G., R.M.V.-H., J.R., J.J.-C.); Department of Genetics, Universitat de Barcelona (M.M.-C.); Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (C.C., M.H.-G., M.S., P.D., A.B., T.G.-B., M.M., J.M., I.F.-C.), and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (L.M.-N., A.D.), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Department of Neurology (R.M.D.-N., S.T., C.J.), and Research Unit (A.M.-D., C.V.-B.), Son Espases University Hospital, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària de Les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca; Stroke Pharmacogenomics and Genetics Group, Fundació Docència i Recerca Mútua Terrassa (N.C., N.P.T.-A., E.M., I.F.-C.); Neurology Service, A Coruña University Hospital and Biomedical Research Institute, La Coruña (M.C.); Department of Neurology, Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona Institute of Biomedical Investigation (J.S.); Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona (J.M.-F.S.); Department of Neurology (T.S.), and Research Unit (G.S.-H.), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete; Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona (V.O.); Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona (M.R., C.A.M., J.A.-S.); Department of Neurology, Hospital de Mataró (E.P.); Department of Neurology, Hospital de Basurto, Bilbao (M.F.); Department of Neurology, Hospital de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat (M.A.F.); Department of Neurology, J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (J.R., N.S.R.); Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA (J.R., C.G.-F.), Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (J.R., C.G.F.); Department of Neurology (J.-M.L., L.H., L.I., C.C., C.-L.P.), and The Division of Emergency Medicine (L.H.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium (R.L.); Laboratory of Neurobiology, VIB, Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven (R.L.); Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven (R.L.); Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.); Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia (V.T.); Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Lund University, Sweden (A.L.); Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden (A.L.); Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sidney (J. Maguire); Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Australia (J. Maguire); Division of Clinical Brain Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (K.R., C.L.S.); Institute of Biomedicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg (C.J., T.M.S.); Bioinformatics Core Facility, University of Gothenburg (E.L.); Stroke Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo (E.L.-C.); Neurology and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (B.B.W.); Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH (D.W.), Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Baltimore VAMC, MD (S.J.K.);Geriatrics Research and Education Clinical Center, Baltimore Veterans Administration Medical Center, MD (B.D.M.); Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (B.D.M.); Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, CSIC, Universidad de Sevilla (J. Montaner); Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla (J. Montaner); Neurology Unit, Neuroscience Department, Mútua de Terrassa Hospital (J.K.), Research Department, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar (X.E.); Genomics Unit, Dexeus Woman’s Health, Barcelona (X.E.); Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona (R.R.); and Stroke Pharmacogenomics and Genetics Group, Institut de Recerca Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona (I.F.-C.).
References
1.
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131:e29–e322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152
2.
World Health Organization. The Top 10 Causes of Death. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed June 11, 2017.
3.
Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:43–53.
4.
Mahar M, Cavalli V. Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:323–337. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0001-8
5.
Roquer J, Ois A, Rodríguez-Campello A, Gomis M, Munteis E, Jiménez-Conde J, Cuadrado-Godia E, Martínez-Rodríguez JE. Atherosclerotic burden and early mortality in acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:699–704. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.5.699
6.
Dijkhuizen RM, Singhal AB, Mandeville JB, Wu O, Halpern EF, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Lo EH. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 2003;23:510–517.
7.
Lindgren A, Maguire J. Stroke recovery genetics. Stroke. 2016;47:2427–2434. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.010648
8.
Maguire JM, Bevan S, Stanne TM, et al. GISCOME – Genetics of ischaemic stroke functional outcome network: a protocol for an international multicentre genetic association study. Eur Stroke J. 2017;2:229–37.
9.
NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) ISGC (ISGC). Loci associated with ischaemic stroke and its subtypes (SiGN): a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;15:4–7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00338-5
10.
Malik R, Chauhan G, Traylor M, et al; AFGen Consortium; Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium; International Genomics of Blood Pressure (iGEN-BP) Consortium; INVENT Consortium; STARNET; BioBank Japan Cooperative Hospital Group; COMPASS Consortium; EPIC-CVD Consortium; EPIC-InterAct Consortium; International Stroke Genetics Consortium (ISGC); METASTROKE Consortium; Neurology Working Group of the CHARGE Consortium; NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN); UK Young Lacunar DNA Study; MEGASTROKE Consortium; MEGASTROKE Consortium:. Multiancestry genome-wide association study of 520,000 subjects identifies 32 loci associated with stroke and stroke subtypes. Nat Genet. 2018;50:524–537. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0058-3
11.
Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:209–213. doi: 10.1038/ng1706
12.
Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41.
13.
Maurano MT, Haugen E, Sandstrom R, Vierstra J, Shafer A, Kaul R, Stamatoyannopoulos JA. Large-scale identification of sequence variants influencing human transcription factor occupancy in vivo. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1393–1401. doi: 10.1038/ng.3432
14.
Lane JM, Liang J, Vlasac I, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of sleep disturbance traits identify new loci and highlight shared genetics with neuropsychiatric and metabolic traits. Nat Genet. 2017;49:274–281. doi: 10.1038/ng.3749
15.
Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, et al; LifeLines Cohort Study; ADIPOGen Consortium; AGEN-BMI Working Group; CARDIOGRAMplusC4D Consortium; CKDGen Consortium; GLGC; ICBP; MAGIC Investigators; MuTHER Consortium; MIGen Consortium; PAGE Consortium; ReproGen Consortium; GENIE Consortium; International Endogene Consortium. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518:197–206. doi: 10.1038/nature14177
16.
Sohn YH, Lee BI, Sunwoo IN, Kim KW, Suh JH. Effect of capsular infarct size on clinical presentation of stroke. Stroke. 1990;21:1258–1261.
17.
Burmeister M, McInnis MG, Zöllner S. Psychiatric genetics: progress amid controversy. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:527–540. doi: 10.1038/nrg2381
18.
Shinohara Y, Minematsu K, Amano T, Ohashi Y. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21:271–278. doi: 10.1159/000091226
19.
Nunn A, Bath PM, Gray LJ. Analysis of the modified Rankin Scale in randomised controlled trials of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke Res Treat. 2016;2016:9482876. doi: 10.1155/2016/9482876
20.
Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:354–373. doi: 10.1037/a0029315
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
Versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
History
Published online: 15 October 2018
Published in print: 4 January 2019
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
Disclosures
None.
Sources of Funding
Genetic contribution to functional outcome and disability after stroke (GODS) project, Fundació Marató-TV3 Grant 2011 (76/C/2011), Recercaixa’13; Generación Project, Instituto de Salud Carlos III; GENISIS (Genetics of Early Neurological InStability After Ischemic Stroke) project, National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) Project, NIH. See information about funding for each cohort in the online-only Data Supplement (p 20).
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Genomics of stroke recovery and outcome, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251332528
- Glycemic variability and its association with short and long term clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with cerebral hemorrhage, Scientific Reports, 15, 1, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92415-9
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Low Risk of Bias, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, 28, 1, (16-42), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2024.07.010
- The association of SUR1 polymorphisms with acute infarct size: The MRI-GENIE study, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 34, 1, (108109), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108109
- In Vitro Models of Cardiovascular Disease: Embryoid Bodies, Organoids and Everything in Between, Biomedicines, 12, 12, (2714), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12122714
- Discovering Novel Loci of Chronic Kidney Disease via Principal Component Analysis based Multiple-trait Genome‑wide Association Study, American Journal of Nephrology, (1-25), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1159/000541982
- Sex-Stratified Genome-Wide Association Study in the Spanish Population Identifies a Novel Locus for Lacunar Stroke, Stroke, 55, 10, (2462-2471), (2024)./doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047833
- Genetic Variation and Stroke Recovery: The STRONG Study, Stroke, 55, 8, (2094-2102), (2024)./doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047643
- DNA methylation and stroke prognosis: an epigenome-wide association study, Clinical Epigenetics, 16, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01690-2
- Multi-Omics Approaches to Discovering Acute Stroke Injury and Recovery Mechanisms, Stroke Genetics, (547-584), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41777-1_19
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.