Skip to main content

Abstract

Accompanying the aging of populations worldwide, and increased survival with chronic diseases, the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) are rising, justifying the term global epidemic. This multifactorial arrhythmia is intertwined with common concomitant cardiovascular diseases, which share classical cardiovascular risk factors. Targeted prevention programs are largely missing. Prevention needs to start at an early age with primordial interventions at the population level. The public health dimension of AF motivates research in modifiable AF risk factors and improved precision in AF prediction and management. In this review, we summarize current knowledge in an attempt to untangle these multifaceted associations from an epidemiological perspective. We discuss disease trends, preventive opportunities offered by underlying risk factors and concomitant disorders, current developments in diagnosis and risk prediction, and prognostic implications of AF and its complications. Finally, we review current technological (eg, eHealth) and methodological (artificial intelligence) advances and their relevance for future prevention and disease management.
With increased average global life expectancy and longer survival with chronic conditions, incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has reached the dimension of a 21st-century cardiovascular disease (CVD) epidemic.1–4 Despite multifaceted research efforts, the prevention of AF and its related complications remains challenging.5

Epidemiology

The incidence and prevalence of AF are increasing globally. Based on data from the FHS (Framingham Heart Study), the prevalence of AF increased 3-fold over the last 50 years.1 The Global Burden of Disease project estimated a worldwide prevalence of AF around 46.3 million individuals in 2016.6 The lifetime risk of AF was estimated about 1 in 4 in white men and women older than 40 years in 20047; a decade later, lifetime risk estimates reached about 1 in 3 in white individuals and 1 in 5 for black individuals (Figure 1).8
Figure 1. Challenges in atrial fibrillation (AF) epidemiology. Prevention in AF becomes important because of epidemic character of disease development. While primary and secondary prevention play a crucial role in older individuals with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and noncardiac diseases, primordial and primary prevention are fundamental in young adults and individuals without known comorbidities. Personal, lifestyle, and social factors as well as societal and health system interventions remain essential prevention targets. CKD indicates chronic kidney disease; OP, surgical operation; and QoL, quality of life. Illustration Credit: Ben Smith and Dr Jelena Kornej.
In the United States alone, at least 3 to 6 million people have AF, and the numbers are projected to reach ≈6 to 16 million by 2050.9,10 In Europe, prevalent AF in 2010 was ≈9 million among individuals older than 55 years and is expected to reach 14 million by 2060.11,12 It was estimated that by 2050 AF will be diagnosed at least in 72 million individuals in Asia, ≈3 million with AF-related strokes.13
Awareness and enhanced detection of AF have improved over the past decade, which is important since about one-third of the total AF population is asymptomatic.14 Therefore, the global AF burden is certainly underestimated (Figure 1). Facilitated and broadly applied rhythm monitoring by portable devices, including smartphones and wearables, initiated by consumers will further increase the prevalence of known AF.15 Precision medicine approaches are needed to identify individuals at higher risk for AF and its sequelae, as well as to implement the most resource-efficient strategies to determine which subgroups of patients to screen and to target for preventive and therapeutic management.
In this review, we summarize the role of common AF risk factors, biomarkers, and omics for prediction of incident AF and their value for risk stratification of AF onset and perpetuation. Furthermore, we review comorbidities with important prognostic aspects and highlight future directions towards precision AF risk assessment and prevention using increasingly available artificial intelligence (AI) methods.

Primordial and Primary Prevention of AF

Nonmodifiable Factors

Advancing Age

Age is the most important risk factor for AF. It is associated with increased AF burden, with a sharp incline after age 65 years. It is expected that the population of >65-year-old adults will double from 12% in 2010 to 22% in 2040.16
In AF, many risk factors act over decades. For example, chronic subclinical inflammation, defined as continuous low-grade activation of the systemic immune response, is a hallmark of biological aging across multiple organ systems. Both AF and age are associated with elevated concentrations of reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, inflammation is related to endothelial dysfunction, collagen catabolism, consequent increase of TGF (transforming growth factor)-ß1 activity, and changes in the extracellular matrix.17 Myocardial and vascular aging comprise changes at structural, functional, cellular, and molecular levels. Therefore, healthy aging could be considered as a goal in primordial and primary AF prevention. Controlling known AF risk factors would slow these degenerative processes and promote fit longevity.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Epidemiology of AF

The overall prevalence of AF in United States is 1% to 2%.10 AF prevalence and incidence in Asians and blacks are lower than in individuals with European ancestry, despite a higher burden of comorbidities in blacks. Possible explanations comprise genetic, socioeconomic, and environmental determinants of health, which have not been completely evaluated.18,19 In the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), the AF incidence was 46% to 65% lower in Hispanics, Asians, and blacks >65 years compared with non-Hispanic whites.19 In a study of over 600 000 Veteran Affairs patients, the age-adjusted prevalence of AF in whites was almost 2-fold higher than in other ethnicities.18
Although a lower AF incidence has been explained by underdetection caused by worse access to healthcare20 and more frequent paroxysmal AF,21 there is evidence that blacks have up to 2 mm smaller left atria (LA) on average compared with whites.22 Genetic studies have shown a single-nucleotide polymorphism mediating part of the increased risk of AF in European ancestry Americans compared with blacks.23 Also, using ancestry informative markers, the CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study) and ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) study reported that European ancestry was associated with higher risk of AF.24
The same paradox has been found within the ethnic groups originating from India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, which represent about 20% of the world’s population.2,25 Similar to blacks, lower AF incidence could be explained by smaller LA size indexed to body dimensions26 and ethnic variations in cardiac ion channels.27–29 However, systematic data on electrophysiological parameters in different ethnic groups remain an unmet need.

Modern Lifestyle and Modifiable Risk Factors for AF

Age, body mass index, height, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), obstructive sleep apnea, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), smoking, and genetic predisposition are well-established risk factors for AF development and perpetuation.30 There is evidence that psychosocial and lifestyle factors are important modulators of AF occurrence, in particular at younger age.31 In this section, besides traditional risk factors such as hypertension and DM, we highlight the importance of lifestyle factors, for example, smoking, alcohol, obesity, extreme sports, and psychological stress.

Hypertension

Up to one-third of US adults have hypertension, and its prevalence is expected to increase up to 46%.6,32 The prevalence of hypertension reaches 80% in individuals >65 years and 26% in adults <45 years. Hypertension predisposes to cardiovascular complications, including coronary heart disease and HF, which contribute to AF initiation and mortality.33 Hypertension carries the largest population attributable risk for AF development worldwide. In the ARIC study, the hypothetical elimination of borderline or elevated risk factors was predicted to avoid more than half of diagnosed AF cases.34 Almost 25% of AF cases were attributed to elevated blood pressure.
Chronic elevated blood pressure leads to LA and left ventricular (LV) structural remodeling and contributes to cardiac profibrotic changes.35 The main contributor to remodeling in hypertension remains the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with upregulated TGF-ß1 expression, increased aldosterone production, activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, and apoptosis.35 Some post hoc analyses suggested that inhibition of RAS could be considered an upstream therapy for AF prevention and management, but the observational and randomized data were inconsistent.36,37 RAS activation is present also in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is closely related to hypertension and AF. Importantly, all 3 diseases—AF, hypertension, CKD—share age and DM as the most important risk factors and stroke as a relevant complication.

Diabetes Mellitus

Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance are main components in DM and are modulators in AF substrate development.38 Type 2 DM is increasingly diagnosed not only in older adults. During past decade, the prevalence of type 2 DM increased by 30% in young, usually obese, individuals aged <20 years.39 DM has been associated with 1.6-fold increased risk of AF.40,41 A meta-analysis reported a 40% increased risk for AF development in adults with compared with individuals without DM.42 Human and animal studies revealed that oxidative stress and inflammation are central modulators for mitochondrial dysfunction and consequent DNA damage, generating a substrate for AF initiation in metabolically stressed hearts.43,44 Also, there is evidence that TGF-β1, RhoA–Rho-associated protein kinase pathway, and advanced glycation end products and their receptor axis are activated in DM and contribute to AF initiation.45 However, the association of DM with AF is not as strong as with other CVD.

Smoking

In the United States, up to 38 million people are current smokers.6 Compared with nonsmokers, the risk for AF in current smokers was significantly higher in the CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) AF Consortium,46 although the association is not as strong as with other CVD. A meta-analysis of 29 prospective studies reported a dose-dependent association between smoking and increased AF risk.47
The main components in tobacco products are nicotine besides tar and carbon monoxide. Nicotine activates profibrotic mechanisms and blocks potassium channels and may thus be directly involved in the development of an electroanatomic substrate for AF.48,49 Indirectly, smoking increases systemic catecholamine release and promote coronary vasospasm leading to myocardial ischemia and, secondarily, to AF.50 Furthermore, smoking is associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and prothrombotic conditions, which facilitate atherosclerotic changes and contribute to atrial ischemic processes.51 Similarly, it has been suggested that vaping leads to proinflammatory changes and endothelial dysfunction. Although data on e-cigarettes’ adverse cardiovascular effects are sparse, a recent retrospective study reported that e-cigarette use was associated with an almost 2-fold risk for MI.52 Whether vaping is associated with AF risk needs to be examined.

Alcohol

Alcohol consumption is common in Western countries, with almost 50% of the American population regularly consuming alcohol. The American Heart Association recommends to limit alcoholic beverages to a maximum of 2 drinks daily for men and 1 drink for women, ideally consumed with meals.53 A meta-analysis found that low alcohol consumption defined as one drink/day was not associated with increased AF incidence.54
In United States over 17% of adult drinkers (≈37 million) are binge drinkers.55 A recent meta-analysis found almost 8% increased AF risk with each additional daily alcoholic drink suggesting a linear dose-response relation.56 The results of ARIC cohort indicate a duration- and dose-dependent association with a higher risk of developing AF.57 Lower AF incidence was associated with longer duration of alcohol abstinence among former heavy drinkers, and every decade of alcohol abstinence—with almost 20% decreased risk of incident AF (≈2%/y).
Long-term alcohol consumption promotes supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, particularly after periods of heavy drinking. Chronic ethanol exposure is associated with longer HV interval, QRS duration, and atrial myocyte action potentials, explaining predisposition to arrhythmias in animal and human models.58 High alcohol consumption has direct toxic, inflammatory, and oxidative effects on LA myocardium. In the FHS, alcohol consumption predicted LA size enlargement and incident AF.59 Alcohol promotes LV remodeling and increases LV pressures facilitating diastolic dysfunction.60 A recent study demonstrated that abstinence or substantial reduction of alcohol intake was associated with fewer AF recurrences in regular drinkers.61 Besides the elimination of direct proarrhythmic effects, the results could be explained by weight reduction. Due to its high energy content (7 kcal/g), unrestricted alcohol intake may lead to weight gain and hypertension, contributing further to AF initiation.
Therefore, alcohol restriction or abstinence should be considered as one of the potentially effective strategies for AF prevention.

Obesity

The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased significantly over the last decades worldwide with significant impact on public health with reduced quality of life and high medical costs.62 It is expected that by 2030 ≈38% of the world’s adult population will be obese.63 However, not only measurements of weight at a single point in time but also dynamic weight changes are associated with higher AF risk compared with stable body weight.64 Interestingly, body mass index gain in later life posed higher AF risk than that during younger years.
A causal role of obesity for AF has been supported by a Mendelian randomization study, which demonstrated that a genetic risk score comprised of 39 polymorphisms associated with body mass index were associated with AF.65 Sustained obesity is associated with hypertension, DM, metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, and obstructive sleep apnea, which provide the substrate for atrial remodeling and contribute to AF initiation and perpetuation (Figure 2).63 There are robust associations between weight gain and electroanatomic remodeling,66 enhanced neurohormonal activation modulating LA enlargement, and electrical instability.67 Furthermore, obesity is related to low-grade inflammation and greater epicardial fat thickness, which impair atrial electrophysiology.68 Some studies indicate that obesity may have a direct influence on myocardial structure via increased oxidative stress.69
Figure 2. Relationship between physical activity, obesity, and lean body mass in atrial fibrillation (AF). Moderate physical activity (PA) should be recommended for all AF prevention levels – primordial, primary, and secondary. Low and extreme PA predisposes to obesity (fat) or excessive muscle (lean body) mass, respectively. Through complex pathophysiological mechanisms, both are risk factors for AF. BDNF indicates brain-derived neurotrophic factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; IL, interleukins; LA, left atrial; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; and LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy. Illustration Credit: Ben Smith and Dr Jelena Kornej.
Weight variability >5% is another factor associated with an almost 2-fold risk of AF recurrence.70 Importantly, weight regain during weight cycling leads to rapid adipose tissue growth and metabolic shifts facilitating lipid storage,71 which are associated with AF risk.
Finally, there are intriguing findings indicating that AF risk is primarily associated with high lean body mass (eg, fat-free mass) and that fat tissue itself contributes remotely to AF development72,73 (Figure 2). One possible explanation is skeletal muscles, which are a secretory organ distinguished by production and release of diverse cytokines and peptides with endocrine effects.74 Muscle activity promotes liver synthesis of follistatin. Follistatin is an inhibitor of myostatin, which is involved in metabolic homeostasis, influencing adipose tissue function, and cardiac hypertrophy.74,75 Thus, inhibition of myostatin was associated with LV hypertrophy, LA enlargement, atrial fibrosis, and spontaneous AF.75

Physical Activity

Regular, moderate physical activity (PA) is a cornerstone of a healthy lifestyle (Figure 2). It is inversely and independently associated with clinical AF incidence and progression, and several studies indicate beneficial effects for AF prevention in individuals pursuing regular PA.76,77 Among the multifactorial beneficial effects of moderate PA are attenuation of many of the cardiovascular consequences related to obesity as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, and reduced blood pressure.78 In overweight and obese individuals, moderate PA reduces systemic inflammation independently of weight loss, minimizing atrial arrhythmogenesis.79
Some investigators reported an association between moderate PA and decreased80,81 AF risk, whereas vigorous PA increased AF risk.82 Although a meta-analysis found that intermediate and high-level PA was associated with lower risk for AF,83 there is a J-shaped relationship between exercise intensity and incident AF.84 In the Tromsø Study, compared with individuals without regular exercise history, individuals with moderate PA had a 28% lower AF risk.85
In contrast to moderate PA, a high volume of endurance exercise increases the risk of AF in elite athletes.86 The risk of AF development in athletes is 5× higher than in referents.87 Some athletes may be more aware of their body and AF symptoms, possibly resulting in earlier diagnosis of AF. However, there are several underlying pathomechanisms explaining higher AF risk in athletes (Figure 3). Cardiac adaptation to vigorous exercise involves increased vagal tone, lower resting heart rate, and increased stroke volume, chamber dilatation, and hypertrophy, all of which may predispose to AF.88,89
Figure 3. Athletes’ heart and atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac adaptations to exercise are considered as beneficial, although vigorous physical activity and prolonged endurance exercise, may lead to cardiac overadaptation or even maladaptation and (patho)-physiological changes, which facilitate AF initiation and perpetuation. LA indicates left atrial; and LV, left ventricular. Illustration Credit: Ben Smith and Dr Jelena Kornej.

Psychological Stress and Psychosocial Factors

The prevalence of chronic stress is ≈8% in United States, but in certain populations, its exposure is ≈40% (eg, military deployment, sexual assault, natural disaster, gun violence).90 In a nationwide study with >1 million young veterans (median age 27 years), posttraumatic stress disorder was associated with 13% higher risk of incident AF.31 Pathophysiologically, psychosocial stress might lead to dysregulations in autonomic tone, hormonal imbalance, and catecholamine overload resulting in the alteration of LA electrophysiology91 and facilitating atrial fibrosis formation.92,93 Furthermore, there is evidence that chronic changes in autonomic tone impair atrial electrophysiological pattern and facilitate AF initiation.94 Chronic psychological stress, including work-related stress as well as depression, anger, anxiety, and sleep deprivation, are linked to the metabolic syndrome and its components95–98 and associated with unhealthy behavior. The prevalence is higher in individuals with lower employment category or socioeconomic level, and in those with continuous stress at work.96,99 Also, psychological stress leads to sleep disorders, including disturbances in sleep-wake cycle and sleep patterns with consequent malfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.100,101 Sleep deprivation impairs the physiological balance in circadian cortisol concentrations, which results in increased sympathetic nervous system activity102 and decreased vagal activity.91
The role of stress reduction for AF prevention has been incompletely studied, partly because of the potential for residual confounding. There is evidence that relaxation strategies, including prayer, yoga, and meditation, transiently modify indices of autonomic activation,103 and improve quality of life in patients with AF.104 The role of stress reduction to prevent incident AF is less certain. Since stress is an exposure that may change over time, repeated measurements in longitudinal studies with extended follow-up would advance the field.
Future Directions in Primary AF Prevention
Further research needs to characterize optimal primordial AF prevention measures (PA, body composition, nutrition) and test implementation strategies targeted to specific populations.
For this aim improvement of AF study populations (eg, inclusion of young individuals, large multiethnic/racial cohorts, long follow-up for lifetime risk analyses) is required to close the remaining, significant knowledge gaps.
Understudied external exposures with many unanswered questions are social determinants, geographic residential environment (rural versus urban), neighborhood, and neighborhood-specific factors (as pollution, socioeconomic status). Also, the role of health literacy remains a challenging condition in vulnerable groups and should be addressed in future epidemiological research.

Comorbidities of AF and Their Impact on Prognosis

AF is associated with increased mortality. Patients generally do not die from the arrhythmia but of accompanying comorbidities and complications, for example, HF, MI, CKD, venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, dementia, and cancer. Beyond shared risk factors, there are multiple direct causal interactions between AF and its comorbidities,105 resulting in an interdependence in disease development (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and system diseases. AF is a multisystem disorder with complex relations to associated diseases, risk factors and the environment. An improved comprehension of this interplay may help improve risk assessment and management of AF and its comorbidities in the future. Illustration Credit: Ben Smith and Dr Jelena Kornej.

Heart Failure

HF is closely related to AF, and their coexistence is associated with substantially increased morbidity and mortality.106,107 Both AF and HF are associated with increased incidence of the other disease suggesting a bidirectional relationship. In a subset of FHS participants who developed new AF, 37% had previously diagnosed HF. Vice versa, 57% of participants developing HF had prevalent AF.107 Incidence of both diseases increases steeply after age of 60 years.16,108
In contrast to the general population, AF development is 4× to 6× higher in patients with HF.40 The most important underlying pathological feature seems to be LA vulnerability caused by structural and electrical remodeling, as shown by electrophysiological mapping in patients with HF.109 Also, the RAS, which is upregulated compensatorily in patients with HF, contributes to the development of AF in patients with HF. The prevalence of AF in patients with HF is related to the severity of HF and rises from <10% in New York Heart Association class I of >50% in New York Heart Association class IV.108 Individuals with HF with preserved ejection fraction are particularly at risk.107,110 Up to two-thirds of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction develop AF simultaneously or close after the diagnosis, and in HF with preserved ejection fraction, AF is associated with a particularly adverse prognosis.110
HF becomes manifest in ≈50% of patients with AF.106 Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors strongly influence the risk of developing HF, and their optimized management may decrease risk,111 but a strong evidence base to prevent HF in AF remains to be defined. Direct effects of AF, such as irregular heart rate, shortened diastole, and loss of atrial contraction, directly result in declines in cardiac output contributing to the development of HF.112 However, there are also long-term effects of AF, also referred to as AF-mediated cardiomyopathy.113 The resulting LV dysfunction is largely reversible after heart rate is controlled.114 However, an increased presence of diffuse fibrosis and cardiomyocyte apoptosis was described,115 which may explain the strong association between previous AF and HF with preserved ejection fraction.116

Myocardial Infarction

In patients with AF, the risk of MI is ≈2-fold increased.117 Conversely, MI is associated with increased incidence of AF, especially in the acute phase.118 Considering the frequent occurrence of asymptomatic AF, real incidence rates may be much higher. The 12-month incidence rate of AF in a post-MI trial monitoring patients with implantable cardiac devices was 32%.119
Not only common cardiovascular risk factors but also several direct interactions explain the bidirectional relationship between both diseases. Tachyarrhythmic episodes may directly result in type 2 MI due to insufficient coronary artery perfusion.120 Furthermore, AF may induce MI by coronary thromboembolism, which accounts for ≈3% of MI cases.121 Likewise, there are several mechanisms of how MI promotes the development of AF. In the acute phase after MI, risk factors for AF development include LV dysfunction, LV hypertrophy, and elevated heart rate.122 Atrial ischemia may cause early-onset AF after MI.123 Also, atrial stretching as a result of acute HF after MI may increase atrial excitability,124 and infarction-related pericarditis has been described as direct cause of AF.125 Further pathophysiologic links between AF and MI are systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, which predispose both diseases. Otherwise, there is evidence that both AF and MI further aggravate cytokine release and systemic inflammation, eventually facilitating development of the other disease.126,127
The co-occurrence of MI and AF is associated with increased mortality of ≈40%.128 Particularly at risk are patients with new-onset AF after MI, which is associated with an 87% higher mortality compared with permanent AF.129 An increased vulnerability for ventricular arrhythmias and an aggravation of ischemia by hemodynamic alterations have been discussed as possible explanations.130

Chronic Kidney Disease

Albuminuria, mild renal impairment, and declining renal function are associated with higher AF incidence.131,132 In a Japanese cohort, patients with glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 59 mL/min had 32% higher risk AF compared with individuals with normal renal function. For those with glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min, the risk was 57% higher.132
AF and CKD share similar risk factors, but their association remains significant in individuals without hypertension or DM.132 A common pathophysiologic pathway is the activation of the RAS. In patients with CKD, RAS activation eventually results in fibrogenesis, oxidative stress, and a downward spiral of kidney function. In AF, similar mechanisms have been described, leading to atrial fibrosis, increased atrial pressure, and modulation of ion channels.133 Likewise, an association with systemic inflammation has been described for both diseases.127 However, AF may also directly contribute to development of CKD by reduced cardiac output or thromboembolism.
The co-occurrence of AF and CKD is associated with an adverse prognosis. In patients with renal impairment, AF is associated with higher risk for HF, MI, and all-cause mortality.134 In a single-center study, patients with end-stage renal disease and AF had a 4-year mortality rate of 81%, compared with 29% in patients without AF.135

Venous Thromboembolism

VTE and AF appear as distinct diseases but are closely related to each other, often co-occur, and share multiple pathophysiological features. Both, incidence of AF after the diagnosis of VTE and incidence of VTE after the diagnosis of AF are ≥70% higher compared with the general population. Within first 6 months after diagnosis of AF or VTE, individuals are susceptible to the other diseases.136
In patients with pulmonary embolism development of AF may partly be caused by increased right cardiac pressure and dilation, resulting in atrial structural remodeling.137 In addition, neurohormonal mechanisms, like the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine by activated platelets, have been proposed.138 More recently, hypercoagulability has been linked to induction of atrial fibrosis.139
As one possible cause of pulmonary embolism in patients with AF, right-sided cardiac thrombus formation is assumed. This hypothesis is further supported by the fact that mortality by pulmonary embolism is increased in patients with right heart thrombi.140 In addition, pulmonary embolism is more frequent in patients with AF than deep vein thrombosis.141 AF itself has not only been associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism but also of deep vein thrombosis,141 which implies more complex pathophysiological interactions of AF and VTE. The most important common denominators seem to be shared risk factors and comorbidities. Both AF and VTE incidence are strongly age-dependent.142 As further risk factors of both diseases HF, obesity, sepsis, and autoimmune diseases have been identified.40,143–145 AF and VTE further have in common systemic inflammation with increased platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and resulting in a prothrombotic state.
The co-occurrence of VTE and AF has serious prognostic implications, and mortality is significantly elevated.146 This seems to account for both prevalent AF and subsequent AF.147 However, it is unclear whether AF is the cause of the increased mortality or only indicates a subset of patients with more comorbidities or more severe embolism.

Stroke

AF is associated with 4- to 5-fold increased risk of stroke, which also accounts for subclinical AF.36,148 Persistent forms of AF carry higher stroke risk compared with paroxysmal AF.149 Currently, the CHA2DS2-VASc score is the most widely used stroke risk score.150 However, there are several predictors, including obstructive sleep apnea151 and renal failure,152 which are not included in the score. Biomarkers such as high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, and growth differentiation factor-15 may improve performance of the current scoring systems.153
The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of thrombus formation and stroke in AF include atrial fibrosis,154,155 atrial enlargement,156 and alterations of blood flow. Interestingly, new-onset AF is also increased after hemorrhagic stroke, which is not a direct result of AF.157 Pathophysiological mechanisms may include dysregulation of autonomous nervous system and inflammation.158 Investigations on patients with implantable cardiac devices did not show a strong correlation between episodes of AF and onset of stroke, suggesting an association beyond thrombus formation.159 Both AF and stroke may indicate progressive CVD and represent risk factors for each other. A bidirectional temporal relationship of AF and stroke was confirmed in prospective community cohort studies.160

Dementia

Stroke in the setting of AF predisposes to dementia. Within 5 years, new-onset dementia was described in about one-third of all stroke patients.161 In patients with AF, a meta-analysis revealed a 2.7-fold risk of dementia after first or recurrent stroke.162
However, there is an association between AF and dementia independent of stroke. Two meta-analyses revealed ≈30% increased risk of dementia in AF after adjustment for cerebrovascular events.162,163 Furthermore, AF is related to cognitive impairment or dementia in younger ages.164 In these studies, no brain imaging was performed to rule out clinically silent strokes as the underlying pathophysiology. In a case-referent study, which included magnetic resonance imaging brain imaging, stroke-free individuals with AF showed difficulties in learning, memory, attention, and executive function compared with healthy referents.165
Nonischemic mechanisms include cerebral hypoperfusion, vascular inflammation, and genetic factors. Cerebral hypoperfusion and hypoxia are mainly induced by AF-related HF, which appears in ≈50% of patients with AF.106 In the FHS, a relation between cardiac output and lower cognitive performance was described.166 In the Rotterdam Study, diastolic dysfunction was linked to stroke and dementia.167 Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 are elevated in AF and correlate with AF duration, success of cardioversion, and thrombogenesis.127,168 Inflammation itself is associated with cerebral microstructural changes and cerebral dysfunction and may be part of the common ground of atrial and cerebral disease.

Cancer

Although cancer and AF frequently co-occur, their relation is understudied. The risk of newly diagnosed cancer in the first three months after new-onset AF is almost 3-fold increased. Similarly, newly diagnosed cancer is accompanied by a significantly increased risk of incident AF.169
Similar to the other AF comorbidities, shared risk factors may contribute to the co-occurrence of AF and cancer.170 The high incidence rate of cancer directly after diagnosis of AF may reflect improved detection of asymptomatic disease due to intensified medical examination. Furthermore, initiation of anticoagulation may trigger bleeding and consecutively lead to a cancer diagnosis.171
Conversely, there are multiple conceivable mechanisms of how cancer might predispose to the development of AF. Thoracic cancer manifestations and surgery may induce AF by cardiac infiltration, inflammation, or mechanical disturbance.172 Likewise, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and high-dose corticosteroids have been associated with AF onset.173 The most notable chemotherapeutics associated with AF are alkylating agents, for example, the incidence of AF with cisplatin is 15% to 32% and with anthracyclines is 10%. More recent developments in oncology like targeted therapies share similar problems. A prominent example is ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which is associated with LA remodeling. In patients treated with ibrutinib, AF incidence rates may reach 38%.174 Further pathophysiological links between cancer and AF include complications of cancer, such as VTE, organ dysfunction, metabolic disorders, hypoxia, and systemic inflammation.93
The incidence of AF in patients with cancer may predict unfavorable outcomes similar to the substantially increased risk of HF.175,176 However, the impact on overall mortality is uncertain. Although in a large retrospective cohort of patients with cancer with AF, overall mortality was not increased,175 a smaller prospective cohort of patients with lymphoma with new AF had nearly 5× higher mortality rate.176 In patients with cancer with AF, disease management remains challenging, and CVD is the primary cause of death not related to cancer.177 A predisposition to bleeding in patients with cancer with AF has been reported.178

Future Directions in Secondary AF Prevention

A key research need in the understanding of AF and its frequent comorbidities is the disentangling of common and distinct pathophysiological pathways, their interactions, and the identification of specific mechanisms that could be addressed for disease prevention in patients in whom comorbidities are prevalent.

Subclinical Markers and Risk Prediction for Incident AF

Many research groups have analyzed the prediction of incident AF using diverse clinical scores based on different combinations and weighting of classical risk factors (Table I in the Data Supplement). Biomarkers have been shown to increase accuracy of risk prediction. Biomarkers are objectively measurable and quantifiable markers of health and disease states. They include protein-based blood markers, cardiac imaging, or electrocardiographic markers, which can provide additional refinement to clinical risk stratification for identification of high-risk individuals for AF onset and complications. Electrocardiographic parameters, such as PR interval and its indices, represent atrial and atrioventricular conduction; therefore, association between pathological PR interval and AF seems to be appropriate.179 Multiple blood biomarkers—especially associated with cardiac damage and stress, cardiac proinflammatory and profibrotic changes in particularly in the atria—have been analyzed in multiple observational and clinical studies to refine prediction of AF incidence and progression (Table II in the Data Supplement). Finally, recent developments and increasing availability of imaging tools, including advanced echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, have become a standard to assess risk profiles in AF but may also contribute to risk prediction for imminent AF. The easily quantifiable echocardiographic anteroposterior LA diameter is a known indicator of AF progression180; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies indicated the importance of anatomic and functional LA changes in AF.181,182

Next Steps Toward Precision AF Management and Prevention

Omics

Recent advances in high-throughput technologies will accelerate our understanding of AF. Integrated approaches combining genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and microbiome data offer the opportunity to further define the molecular framework of AF and have already brought new insights.
Genetics and genomics have come closest to clinical practice. In familial or early-onset forms of AF, several single rare genetic variants with large effect sizes in AF development have been reported over the past decades. These variants often encode ion channel or sarcomere protein components and provide a substrate for reentry or early and delayed after-depolarization leading to AF.183,184 The reported mutations appear to be infrequent and rare variants appear to account for a relatively small proportion of genetically determined AF in the general population. The genetic variants associated with AF in individuals of non-European ancestry also are largely unknown.
Over the past few years, genome-wide association studies have revealed a polygenic basis with common genetic variations in over 100 loci associated with a modification of AF risk.185,186 Polygenic scores based on common genetic variation may improve risk stratification beyond cardiovascular risk factors.187 The majority of these common genetic variants are located in regulatory, noncoding-regions of genes enriched within the transcriptional regulation, development, and signaling pathways of electrophysiological, contractile, and structural characteristics of cardiomyocytes. Many of these genes have previously been associated with other medical conditions, such as cardiovascular or musculoskeletal diseases. These massive genotyping efforts provide many candidate loci for AF and lay the ground for further mechanistic investigation and therapeutic targets.
Other ‘omics analyses also revealed new insights. Proteomic profiling recently identified 8 proteins associated with incident AF, whereas their causal relation to AF development remains unclear.188 On the epigenetic level, a methylome-wide association study of AF revealed 7 methylation signatures associated with prevalent or incident AF.189 By combining phenomic, metabolic, and genomic data, potassium, sodium ion, chitin, benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-oxide, and celebrex were found to be the five most important AF-related metabolites.190 Moreover, proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed ketone body metabolism as a central step in persistent AF supported by proteomic analyses.191 In this study, metabolic profiles correctly predicted postoperative AF in >80% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Yet to be discovered is the role of the microbiome, its composition, and quantity in predicting AF. First evidence suggests an association of the gut microbiome in the AF development.192 Another aspect that has to be taken into account in a holistic approach is the so-called exposome, including environmental influences, living circumstances, and biopsychological aspects.
Until now, most ‘omic studies have been small and remained without external validation. The step towards clinical implementation still must be taken. The hope is that better understanding of the triggers and mechanisms underlying AF may help define targets for prevention and treatment.

Future Directions for Translational Research

In the future, ‘omics-analyses may represent an important step towards AF precision medicine if ways for translational implementation of genetics and omics findings in clinical care with sufficient precision and justifiable costs can be defined.

eHealth and AI

Health promotion and maintenance takes part largely outside the clinical setting. Significant advances are expected from technological developments known as electronic or mobile health (eHealth). A dynamic increase in the availability of mobile devices, wearable sensors, and software applications (apps) allows close health and disease monitoring.193 Following a general trend, eHealth has gained attention in cardiovascular prevention and diagnostics of AF.194,195 eHealth can be helpful to control and modify diverse risk factors associated with AF (eg, PA, weight management, blood pressure, DM control, medication adherence). Also, it can help with AF detection (arrhythmic pulse, electrocardiograms). In patients with asymptomatic or paroxysmal AF with short episodes, eHealth gives the opportunity to improve early diagnosis of AF, with the potential to reduce future hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality. However, overdiagnosis (and consequently overtreatment) is becoming a growing problem in contemporary medicine, partly due to rising influence of technical improvements. False-positive AF detection or ascertainment of very short self-limited AF may precipitate a testing and treatment cascade, which may significantly affect individuals’ lives.196 The risks of overdiagnosis are balanced against the thousands of patients with undiagnosed cerebrovascular complications related to AF that are associated with significant health care costs.197
Alternatives for rhythm monitoring are smartphones and smartwatches, which have become popular across all population groups. These devices and wearable fitness trackers recognize arrhythmia pattern using AI systems.198 Deep learning algorithms monitor digital pulse waveforms and detect nonuniform and irregular heartbeats. Notifications permit timely medical consultation, further testing, and potential diagnosis of AF. Many evidence gaps remain, including whether high-risk individuals use such applications, whether wearable-detected AF carries a high enough risk to require anticoagulation, in particular, if only short episodes are present, whether anxiety and overuse of medical care are consequences of false positives, resulting in questions regarding whether the use of such devices for AF screening is efficient at the population level.
In the era of rapid advances of AI in cardiovascular medicine, new methods of almost hypothesis-free interrogation of big data sets for the identification of AF predictors carry the potential to render AF screening and targeted treatment more efficient. AI structures large amounts of data, often instantaneously, improves algorithms autonomously, and may facilitate processes along the public health continuum from primordial to primary and secondary prevention of AF by increasing effectiveness and efficiency of diagnosis, screening, and treatment. Using automated learning algorithms machine learning (ML) represents an approach to generate unique prediction tools in primary care, to recognize high-risk individuals for AF, as well as guide physicians and patients managing AF.199
More comprehensive use of available information from multiple distinct sources, for example, electronic health records, imaging, genetics, eHealth, etc, may promote understanding of disease patterns and permit the definition of clinically relevant AF subtypes. In initially healthy individuals in the deep-phenotyped MESA cohort, ML was able to improve predictive accuracy for AF.200 ML can select clinical and biomarker variables indicating prevalent AF.201 Recently, an ML data-driven approach assisted identification of multilevel interactions between clinical and ECG variables without predefined theoretical connections.202 ML was able to predict incident AF with high accuracy using ECG analysis with documented sinus rhythm. Nevertheless, external validation of these findings and demonstration of clinical relevance is necessary. Also, there is a risk of a significant amount of data with little or no clinical relevance. As recently reported, although ML diagnosed subclinical AF more accurately than clinicians, predicted AF was neither associated with prolonged hospital stay nor with mortality.203 In fact, there is a risk of an unnecessary (over)-treatment and treatment-related complications.204 A further cautionary note about the use of ML in AF research and clinical care is awareness that ML may amplify biases inherent in previously collected data.205

Future Directions for Digital Health

Major research needs are the assessment of the effectiveness of eHealth, definition of the best-suited target population, and adaption of eHealth tools and requirements for AF screening, detection, monitoring, and treatment.
Major knowledge gaps and research needs comprise the expansion of AI multilevel application to AF risk prediction, AF subtype classification, and management guidance, for example, decision support tools, and demonstrate generalizability outside the derivation samples.

Conclusions

The significantly increasing incidence, prevalence, and high lifetime risk render AF a relevant disease in the population with high morbidity, mortality, and significant health care costs. Identification and targeting modifiable risk factors might be considered as the most relevant investment for AF risk modulation, number of lives saved, and healthcare resources freed. Primordial, primary, and secondary AF prevention include interventions at personal, healthcare, and societal levels. Recent achievements in biomarker, omics, eHealth, and AI research will be essential to refine AF risk prediction and communication and will help modify AF prevention and management.

Footnote

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF
atrial fibrillation
AI
artificial intelligence
ARIC
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities
CHS
Cardiovascular Health Study
CKD
chronic kidney disease
CVD
cardiovascular disease
DM
diabetes mellitus
FHS
Framingham Heart Study
HF
heart failure
LA
left atrial
LV
left ventricular
MESA
Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
eHealth
electronic health
MI
myocardial infarction
ML
machine learning
PA
physical activity
RAS
renin-angiotensin system
TGF
transforming growth factor
VTE
venous thromboembolism

References

1.
Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, Larson MG, Beiser AS, McManus DD, Newton-Cheh C, Lubitz SA, Magnani JW, Ellinor PT, et al. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386:154–162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61774-8
2.
Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH, Zheng ZJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119
3.
Fordyce CB, Roe MT, Ahmad T, Libby P, Borer JS, Hiatt WR, Bristow MR, Packer M, Wasserman SM, Braunstein N, et al. Cardiovascular drug development: is it dead or just hibernating? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1567–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.016
4.
Braunwald E. Shattuck lecture–cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1360–1369. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711063371906
5.
Benjamin EJ, Chen PS, Bild DE, Mascette AM, Albert CM, Alonso A, Calkins H, Connolly SJ, Curtis AB, Darbar D, et al. Prevention of atrial fibrillation: report from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop. Circulation. 2009;119:606–618. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.825380
6.
Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e56–e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659
7.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, D’Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Beiser A, Wolf PA, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110:1042–1046. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42
8.
Mou L, Norby FL, Chen LY, O’Neal WT, Lewis TT, Loehr LR, Soliman EZ, Alonso A. Lifetime Risk of Atrial Fibrillation by Race and Socioeconomic Status: ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006350. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006350
9.
Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Tsang TS. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006;114:119–125. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140
10.
Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370
11.
Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Stricker BH, Heeringa J. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2746–2751. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht280
12.
Di Carlo A, Bellino L, Consoli D, Mori F, Zaninelli A, Baldereschi M, Cattarinussi A, D’Alfonso MG, Gradia C, Sgherzi B, et al; National Research Program: Progetto FAILFAiI. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Italian elderly population and projections from 2020 to 2060 for Italy and the European Union: the FAI Project. Europace. 2019;21:1468–1475
13.
Chiang CE, Wang KL, Lip GY. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an Asian perspective. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:789–797. doi: 10.1160/TH13-11-0948
14.
Dilaveris PE, Kennedy HL. Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:413–418. doi: 10.1002/clc.22667
15.
Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, Balasubramanian V, Russo AM, Rajmane A, Cheung L, et al.; Apple Heart Study Investigators. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1909–1917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183
16.
Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, Finkelstein EA, Hong Y, Johnston SC, Khera A, et al.; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee; Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Arteriosclerosis; Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiopulmonary; Critical Care; Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:933–944. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5
17.
Shen MJ, Arora R, Jalife J. Atrial Myopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4:640–654. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.05.005
18.
Borzecki AM, Bridgers DK, Liebschutz JM, Kader B, Kazis LE, Berlowitz DR. Racial differences in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation among males. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100:237–245. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31212-8
19.
Rodriguez CJ, Soliman EZ, Alonso A, Swett K, Okin PM, Goff DC, Heckbert SR. Atrial fibrillation incidence and risk factors in relation to race-ethnicity and the population attributable fraction of atrial fibrillation risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Ann Epidemiol. 2015;25:71–6, 76.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.024
20.
2015 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report and 5th Anniversary Update on the National Quality Strategy. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015.
21.
Soliman EZ, Alonso A, Goff DC Atrial fibrillation and ethnicity: the known, the unknown and the paradox. Future Cardiol. 2009;5:547–556. doi: 10.2217/fca.09.49
22.
Marcus GM, Olgin JE, Whooley M, Vittinghoff E, Stone KL, Mehra R, Hulley SB, Schiller NB. Racial differences in atrial fibrillation prevalence and left atrial size. Am J Med. 2010;123:375.e1–375.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.019
23.
Roberts JD, Hu D, Heckbert SR, Alonso A, Dewland TA, Vittinghoff E, Liu Y, Psaty BM, Olgin JE, Magnani JW, et al. Genetic investigation into the differential risk of atrial fibrillation among black and white individuals. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:442–450. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1185
24.
Marcus GM, Alonso A, Peralta CA, Lettre G, Vittinghoff E, Lubitz SA, Fox ER, Levitzky YS, Mehra R, Kerr KF, et al.; Candidate-Gene Association Resource (CARe) Study. European ancestry as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in African Americans. Circulation. 2010;122:2009–2015. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958306
25.
Conway DS, Lip GY. Ethnicity in relation to atrial fibrillation and stroke (the West Birmingham Stroke Project). Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:1476–1479. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.08.065
26.
Echocardiographic Normal Ranges Meta-Analysis of the Left Heart Collaboration. Ethnic-Specific Normative Reference Values for Echocardiographic LA and LV Size, LV Mass, and Systolic Function: The EchoNoRMAL Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:656–65.
27.
Bezzina CR, Shimizu W, Yang P, Koopmann TT, Tanck MW, Miyamoto Y, Kamakura S, Roden DM, Wilde AA. Common sodium channel promoter haplotype in asian subjects underlies variability in cardiac conduction. Circulation. 2006;113:338–344. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.580811
28.
Ackerman MJ, Splawski I, Makielski JC, Tester DJ, Will ML, Timothy KW, Keating MT, Jones G, Chadha M, Burrow CR, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of cardiac sodium channel variants among black, white, Asian, and Hispanic individuals: implications for arrhythmogenic susceptibility and Brugada/long QT syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1:600–607. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.013
29.
Ackerman MJ, Tester DJ, Jones GS, Will ML, Burrow CR, Curran ME. Ethnic differences in cardiac potassium channel variants: implications for genetic susceptibility to sudden cardiac death and genetic testing for congenital long QT syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:1479–1487. doi: 10.4065/78.12.1479
30.
Staerk L, Sherer JA, Ko D, Benjamin EJ, Helm RH. Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Res. 2017;120:1501–1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732
31.
Rosman L, Lampert R, Ramsey CM, Dziura J, Chui PW, Brandt C, Haskell S, Burg MM. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Risk for Early Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Cohort Study of 1.1 Million Young Adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013741. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013741
32.
Andrade J, Khairy P, Dobrev D, Nattel S. The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2014;114:1453–1468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303211
33.
Lawler PR, Hiremath P, Cheng S. Cardiac target organ damage in hypertension: insights from epidemiology. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:446. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0446-8
34.
Huxley RR, Lopez FL, Folsom AR, Agarwal SK, Loehr LR, Soliman EZ, Maclehose R, Konety S, Alonso A. Absolute and attributable risks of atrial fibrillation in relation to optimal and borderline risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2011;123:1501–1508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009035
35.
Dzeshka MS, Lip GY, Snezhitskiy V, Shantsila E. Cardiac Fibrosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:943–959. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1313
36.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210
37.
January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
38.
Rutter MK, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Larson MG, Meigs JB, Nesto RW, Wilson PW, Vasan RS. Impact of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance on cardiac structure and function: sex-related differences in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107:448–454. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000045671.62860.98
39.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Delling F., et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596. CIR0000000000000757
40.
Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1994;271:840–844.
41.
Watanabe H, Tanabe N, Watanabe T, Darbar D, Roden DM, Sasaki S, Aizawa Y. Metabolic syndrome and risk of development of atrial fibrillation: the Niigata preventive medicine study. Circulation. 2008;117:1255–1260. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.744466
42.
Huxley RR, Filion KB, Konety S, Alonso A. Meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.004
43.
Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Jiang N, Qiu J, Yang Y, Li J, Liang X, Wang X, Tse G. Alogliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, Alleviates Atrial Remodeling and Improves Mitochondrial Function and Biogenesis in Diabetic Rabbits. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005945
44.
Odegaard AO, Jacobs DR, Sanchez OA, Goff DC, Reiner AP, Gross MD. Oxidative stress, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and incidence of type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0369-6
45.
Karam BS, Chavez-Moreno A, Koh W, Akar JG, Akar FG. Oxidative stress and inflammation as central mediators of atrial fibrillation in obesity and diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0604-9
46.
Alonso A, Krijthe BP, Aspelund T, Stepas KA, Pencina MJ, Moser CB, Sinner MF, Sotoodehnia N, Fontes JD, Janssens AC, et al. Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000102. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000102
47.
Aune D, Schlesinger S, Norat T, Riboli E. Tobacco smoking and the risk of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:1437–1451. doi: 10.1177/2047487318780435
48.
Shan H, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Zhang Y, Pan Z, Cai B, Wang N, Li X, Feng T, Hong Y, et al. Downregulation of miR-133 and miR-590 contributes to nicotine-induced atrial remodelling in canines. Cardiovasc Res. 2009;83:465–472. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp130
49.
Wang H, Shi H, Zhang L, Pourrier M, Yang B, Nattel S, Wang Z. Nicotine is a potent blocker of the cardiac A-type K(+) channels. Effects on cloned Kv4.3 channels and native transient outward current. Circulation. 2000;102:1165–1171. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1165
50.
DeFilippis EM, Singh A, Divakaran S, Gupta A, Collins BL, Biery D, Qamar A, Fatima A, Ramsis M, Pipilas D, et al. Cocaine and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2540–2551. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.047
51.
Levitzky YS, Guo CY, Rong J, Larson MG, Walter RE, Keaney JF, Sutherland PA, Vasan A, Lipinska I, Evans JC, et al. Relation of smoking status to a panel of inflammatory markers: the framingham offspring. Atherosclerosis. 2008;201:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.058
52.
Alzahrani T, Pena I, Temesgen N, Glantz SA. Association Between Electronic Cigarette Use and Myocardial Infarction. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55:455–461. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.05.004
53.
Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, Franklin B, Kris-Etherton P, Harris WS, Howard B., et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;114:82–96.
54.
Gallagher C, Hendriks JML, Elliott AD, Wong CX, Rangnekar G, Middeldorp ME, Mahajan R, Lau DH, Sanders P. Alcohol and incident atrial fibrillation - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;246:46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.133
55.
Kanny D, Naimi TS, Liu Y, Lu H, Brewer RD. Annual Total Binge Drinks Consumed by U.S. Adults, 2015. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54:486–496. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.12.021
56.
Larsson SC, Drca N, Wolk A. Alcohol consumption and risk of atrial fibrillation: a prospective study and dose-response meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.048
57.
Dixit S, Alonso A, Vittinghoff E, Soliman EZ, Chen LY, Marcus GM. Past alcohol consumption and incident atrial fibrillation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185228
58.
Pásek M, Bébarová M, Christé G, Šimurdová M, Šimurda J. Acute effects of ethanol on action potential and intracellular Ca(2+) transient in cardiac ventricular cells: a simulation study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54:753–762. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1366-8
59.
McManus DD, Yin X, Gladstone R, Vittinghoff E, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Marcus GM. Alcohol consumption, left atrial diameter, and atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5.
60.
Voskoboinik A, Prabhu S, Ling LH, Kalman JM, Kistler PM. Alcohol and Atrial Fibrillation: A Sobering Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2567–2576. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.074
61.
Voskoboinik A, Kalman JM, De Silva A, Nicholls T, Costello B, Nanayakkara S, Prabhu S, Stub D, Azzopardi S, Vizi D, et al. Alcohol abstinence in drinkers with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:20–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817591
62.
Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu Y, Bahalim AN, et al.; Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index). National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet. 2011;377:557–567. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5
63.
Hruby A, Hu FB. The Epidemiology of Obesity: A Big Picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:673–689. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x
64.
Huxley RR, Misialek JR, Agarwal SK, Loehr LR, Soliman EZ, Chen LY, Alonso A. Physical activity, obesity, weight change, and risk of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:620–625. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001244
65.
Chatterjee NA, Giulianini F, Geelhoed B, Lunetta KL, Misialek JR, Niemeijer MN, Rienstra M, Rose LM, Smith AV, Arking DE, et al. Genetic obesity and the risk of atrial fibrillation: causal estimates from mendelian randomization. Circulation. 2017;135:741–754. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024921
66.
Abed HS, Samuel CS, Lau DH, Kelly DJ, Royce SG, Alasady M, Mahajan R, Kuklik P, Zhang Y, Brooks AG, et al. Obesity results in progressive atrial structural and electrical remodeling: implications for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.08.043
67.
Gerdts E, Wachtell K, Omvik P, Otterstad JE, Oikarinen L, Boman K, Dahlöf B, Devereux RB. Left atrial size and risk of major cardiovascular events during antihypertensive treatment: losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension trial. Hypertension. 2007;49:311–316. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000254322.96189.85
68.
Lin YK, Chen YC, Chang SL, Lin YJ, Chen JH, Yeh YH, Chen SA, Chen YJ. Heart failure epicardial fat increases atrial arrhythmogenesis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1979–1983. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.009
69.
Vincent HK, Powers SK, Stewart DJ, Shanely RA, Demirel H, Naito H. Obesity is associated with increased myocardial oxidative stress. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:67–74. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800761
70.
Pathak RK, Middeldorp ME, Meredith M, Mehta AB, Mahajan R, Wong CX, Twomey D, Elliott AD, Kalman JM, Abhayaratna WP, et al. Long-Term Effect of Goal-Directed Weight Management in an Atrial Fibrillation Cohort: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study (LEGACY). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2159–2169. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.002
71.
Strohacker K, Carpenter KC, McFarlin BK. Consequences of Weight Cycling: An Increase in Disease Risk? Int J Exerc Sci. 2009;2:191–201.
72.
Fenger-Grøn M, Vinter N, Frost L. Body mass and atrial fibrillation risk: Status of the epidemiology concerning the influence of fat versus lean body mass. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30:205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.009
73.
Worm MS, Bager CL, Blair JPM, Secher NH, Riis BJ, Christiansen C, Nielsen HB. Atrial fibrillation is associated with lean body mass in postmenopausal women. Sci Rep. 2020;10:573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57167-3
74.
Pedersen BK, Febbraio MA. Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:457–465. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.49
75.
Matsui T, Li L, Wu JC, Cook SA, Nagoshi T, Picard MH, Liao R, Rosenzweig A. Phenotypic spectrum caused by transgenic overexpression of activated Akt in the heart. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:22896–22901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200347200
76.
Blum S, Aeschbacher S, Meyre P, Zwimpfer L, Reichlin T, Beer JH, Ammann P, Auricchio A, Kobza R, Erne P, et al.; Swiss-AF Investigators. Incidence and Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Progression. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e012554. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012554
77.
Azarbal F, Stefanick ML, Salmoirago-Blotcher E, Manson JE, Albert CM, LaMonte MJ, Larson JC, Li W, Martin LW, Nassir R, et al. Obesity, physical activity, and their interaction in incident atrial fibrillation in postmenopausal women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e001127A
78.
Bassuk SS, Manson JE. Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;99:1193–1204. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00160.2005
79.
Milani RV, Lavie CJ, Mehra MR. Reduction in C-reactive protein through cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1056–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.041
80.
Everett BM, Conen D, Buring JE, Moorthy MV, Lee IM, Albert CM. Physical activity and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation in women. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:321–327. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.951442
81.
Mozaffarian D, Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Siscovick D. Physical activity and incidence of atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2008;118:800–807. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785626
82.
Aizer A, Gaziano JM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Albert CM. Relation of vigorous exercise to risk of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1572–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.374
83.
Zhu W, Shen Y, Zhou Q, Xu Z, Huang L, Chen Q, Hong K. Association of Physical Fitness With the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39:421–428. doi: 10.1002/clc.22552
84.
Ricci C, Gervasi F, Gaeta M, Smuts CM, Schutte AE, Leitzmann MF. Physical activity volume in relation to risk of atrial fibrillation. A non-linear meta-regression analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:857–866. doi: 10.1177/2047487318768026
85.
Morseth B, Graff-Iversen S, Jacobsen BK, Jørgensen L, Nyrnes A, Thelle DS, Vestergaard P, Løchen ML. Physical activity, resting heart rate, and atrial fibrillation: the Tromsø Study. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2307–2313. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw059
86.
Molina L, Mont L, Marrugat J, Berruezo A, Brugada J, Bruguera J, Rebato C, Elosua R. Long-term endurance sport practice increases the incidence of lone atrial fibrillation in men: a follow-up study. Europace. 2008;10:618–623. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun071
87.
Abdulla J, Nielsen JR. Is the risk of atrial fibrillation higher in athletes than in the general population? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2009;11:1156–1159. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup197
88.
Wilhelm M. Atrial fibrillation in endurance athletes. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21:1040–1048. doi: 10.1177/2047487313476414
89.
Guasch E, Benito B, Qi X, Cifelli C, Naud P, Shi Y, Mighiu A, Tardif JC, Tadevosyan A, Chen Y, et al. Atrial fibrillation promotion by endurance exercise: demonstration and mechanistic exploration in an animal model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.091
90.
Sareen J. Posttraumatic stress disorder in adults: impact, comorbidity, risk factors, and treatment. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59:460–467. doi: 10.1177/070674371405900902
91.
Taggart P, Boyett MR, Logantha S, Lambiase PD. Anger, emotion, and arrhythmias: from brain to heart. Front Physiol. 2011;2:67. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00067
92.
Spragg D. Left Atrial Fibrosis: Role in Atrial Fibrillation Pathophysiology and Treatment Outcomes. J Atr Fibrillation. 2013;5:810. doi: 10.4022/jafib.810
93.
Aviles RJ, Martin DO, Apperson-Hansen C, Houghtaling PL, Rautaharju P, Kronmal RA, Tracy RP, Van Wagoner DR, Psaty BM, Lauer MS, et al. Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003;108:3006–3010. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000103131.70301.4F
94.
Lampert R. Behavioral influences on cardiac arrhythmias. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016;26:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2015.04.008
95.
Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. The relationship between psychological risk attributes and the metabolic syndrome in healthy women: antecedent or consequence? Metabolism. 2002;51:1573–1577. doi: 10.1053/meta.2002.36301
96.
Golden SH, Williams JE, Ford DE, Yeh HC, Paton Sanford C, Nieto FJ, Brancati F.; Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Depressive symptoms and the risk of type 2 diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:429–435. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.429
97.
Ogawa Y, Kanbayashi T, Saito Y, Takahashi Y, Kitajima T, Takahashi K, Hishikawa Y, Shimizu T. Total sleep deprivation elevates blood pressure through arterial baroreflex resetting: a study with microneurographic technique. Sleep. 2003;26:986–989. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.8.986
98.
Maes M. Major depression and activation of the inflammatory response system. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;461:25–46. doi: 10.1007/978-0-585-37970-8_2
99.
Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M. Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ. 2006;332:521–525. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38693.435301.80
100.
Christensen MA, Dixit S, Dewland TA, Whitman IR, Nah G, Vittinghoff E, Mukamal KJ, Redline S, Robbins JA, Newman AB, et al. Sleep characteristics that predict atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1289–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.008
101.
Marulanda-Londoño E, Chaturvedi S. The Interplay between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Atrial Fibrillation. Front Neurol. 2017;8:668. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00668
102.
Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet. 1999;354:1435–1439. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01376-8
103.
Bernardi L, Sleight P, Bandinelli G, Cencetti S, Fattorini L, Wdowczyc-Szulc J, Lagi A. Effect of rosary prayer and yoga mantras on autonomic cardiovascular rhythms: comparative study. BMJ. 2001;323:1446–1449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1446
104.
Lakkireddy D, Atkins D, Pillarisetti J, Ryschon K, Bommana S, Drisko J, Vanga S, Dawn B. Effect of yoga on arrhythmia burden, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the YOGA My Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.060
105.
Bisbal F, Baranchuk A, Braunwald E, Bayés de Luna A, Bayés-Genís A. Atrial Failure as a Clinical Entity: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.013
106.
Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, Leip EP, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Murabito JM, Kannel WB, Benjamin EJ. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107:2920–2925. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072767.89944.6E
107.
Santhanakrishnan R, Wang N, Larson MG, Magnani JW, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, Cheng S, Vasan RS, Lee DS, et al. Atrial fibrillation begets heart failure and vice versa: temporal associations and differences in preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2016;133:484–492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018614
108.
Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:6A–13A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90455-a
109.
Sanders P, Morton JB, Davidson NC, Spence SJ, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Kalman JM. Electrical remodeling of the atria in congestive heart failure: electrophysiological and electroanatomic mapping in humans. Circulation. 2003;108:1461–1468. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000090688.49283.67
110.
Zafrir B, Lund LH, Laroche C, Ruschitzka F, Crespo-Leiro MG, Coats AJS, Anker SD, Filippatos G, Seferovic PM, Maggioni AP, et al.; ESC-HFA HF Long-Term Registry Investigators. Prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction: a report from 14 964 patients in the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:4277–4284. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy626
111.
Chatterjee NA, Chae CU, Kim E, Moorthy MV, Conen D, Sandhu RK, Cook NR, Lee IM, Albert CM. Modifiable risk factors for incident heart failure in atrial fibrillation. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:552–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.04.004
112.
Viswanathan K, Daniak SM, Salomone K, Kiely T, Patel U, Converso K, Manning WJ, Silverman DI. Effect of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on improvement in left ventricular performance. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:439–441. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01699-x
113.
Qin D, Mansour MC, Ruskin JN, Heist EK. Atrial Fibrillation-Mediated Cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12:e007809. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007809
114.
Lee SH, Chen SA, Tai CT, Chiang CE, Wen ZC, Cheng JJ, Ding YA, Chang MS. Comparisons of quality of life and cardiac performance after complete atrioventricular junction ablation and atrioventricular junction modification in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:637–644. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00530-5
115.
Mueller KAL, Heinzmann D, Klingel K, Fallier-Becker P, Kandolf R, Kilias A, Walker-Allgaier B, Borst O, Kumbrink J, Kirchner T, et al. Histopathological and Immunological Characteristics of Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2160–2172. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.049
116.
Brouwers FP, de Boer RA, van der Harst P, Voors AA, Gansevoort RT, Bakker SJ, Hillege HL, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH. Incidence and epidemiology of new onset heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a community-based cohort: 11-year follow-up of PREVEND. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1424–1431. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht066
117.
Soliman EZ, Lopez F, O’Neal WT, Chen LY, Bengtson L, Zhang ZM, Loehr L, Cushman M, Alonso A. Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of ST-Segment-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation. 2015;131:1843–1850. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014145
118.
Laurent G, Zeller M, Dentan G, Moreau D, Laurent Y, Beer JC, Makki H, Lhuillier I, Janin-Manificat L, Fraison M, et al. Prognostic impact of new onset atrial fibrillation in acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction data from the RICO survey. Heart. 2005;91:369–370. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.028035
119.
Jons C, Jacobsen UG, Joergensen RM, Olsen NT, Dixen U, Johannessen A, Huikuri H, Messier M, McNitt S, Thomsen P.; Cardiac Arrhythmias and Risk Stratification after Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARISMA) Study Group. The incidence and prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a CARISMA substudy. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.090
120.
Gupta S, Vaidya SR, Arora S, Bahekar A, Devarapally SR. Type 2 versus type 1 myocardial infarction: a comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes with a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:348–358. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.21
121.
Shibata T, Kawakami S, Noguchi T, Tanaka T, Asaumi Y, Kanaya T, Nagai T, Nakao K, Fujino M, Nagatsuka K, et al. Prevalence, Clinical Features, and Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Attributable to Coronary Artery Embolism. Circulation. 2015;132:241–250. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.015134
122.
Rathore SS, Berger AK, Weinfurt KP, Schulman KA, Oetgen WJ, Gersh BJ, Solomon AJ. Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Circulation. 2000;101:969–974. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.9.969
123.
Alasady M, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, Lim HS, Lau DH, Barlow D, Kuklik P, Worthley MI, Roberts-Thomson KC, Saint DA, et al. Myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation: importance of atrial ischemia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:738–745. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000163
124.
Celik S, Erdöl C, Baykan M, Kaplan S, Kasap H. Relation between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:160–2, A5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01611-3
125.
Nagahama Y, Sugiura T, Takehana K, Hatada K, Inada M, Iwasaka T. The role of infarction-associated pericarditis on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:287–292. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0744
126.
Parashar S, Kella D, Reid KJ, Spertus JA, Tang F, Langberg J, Vaccarino V, Kontos MC, Lopes RD, Lloyd MS. New-onset atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction and its relation to admission biomarkers (from the TRIUMPH registry). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1390–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.006
127.
Guo Y, Lip GY, Apostolakis S. Inflammation in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2263–2270. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.063
128.
Jabre P, Roger VL, Murad MH, Chamberlain AM, Prokop L, Adnet F, Jouven X. Mortality associated with atrial fibrillation in patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2011;123:1587–1593. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.986661
129.
Angeli F, Reboldi G, Garofoli M, Ramundo E, Poltronieri C, Mazzotta G, Ambrosio G, Verdecchia P. Atrial fibrillation and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14:601–610. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0289-3
130.
Berton G, Cordiano R, Cucchini F, Cavuto F, Pellegrinet M, Palatini P. Atrial fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction: association with all-cause mortality and sudden death after 7-year of follow-up. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63:712–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02023.x
131.
Bansal N, Zelnick LR, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, de Boer IH, Deo R, Katz R, Kestenbaum B, Mathew J, Robinson-Cohen C, et al. eGFR and Albuminuria in Relation to Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of the Jackson Heart Study, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and the Cardiovascular Health Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12:1386–1398. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01860217
132.
Watanabe H, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, Nagai K, Roden DM, Aizawa Y. Close bidirectional relationship between chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: the Niigata preventive medicine study. Am Heart J. 2009;158:629–636. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.031
133.
Ehrlich JR, Hohnloser SH, Nattel S. Role of angiotensin system and effects of its inhibition in atrial fibrillation: clinical and experimental evidence. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:512–518. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi668
134.
Massicotte-Azarniouch D, Kuwornu JP, Carrero JJ, Lam NN, Molnar AO, Zimmerman D, McCallum MK, Garg AX, Sood MM. Incident Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk of Congestive Heart Failure, Myocardial Infarction, End-Stage Kidney Disease, and Mortality Among Patients With a Decreased Estimated GFR. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;71:191–199. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.016
135.
Vázquez E, Sánchez-Perales C, Lozano C, García-Cortés MJ, Borrego F, Guzmán M, Pérez P, Pagola C, Borrego MJ, Pérez V. Comparison of prognostic value of atrial fibrillation versus sinus rhythm in patients on long-term hemodialysis. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:868–871. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00904-4
136.
Lutsey PL, Norby FL, Alonso A, Cushman M, Chen LY, Michos ED, Folsom AR. Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: evidence of bidirectionality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:670–679. doi: 10.1111/jth.13974
137.
Kline JA, Steuerwald MT, Marchick MR, Hernandez-Nino J, Rose GA. Prospective evaluation of right ventricular function and functional status 6 months after acute submassive pulmonary embolism: frequency of persistent or subsequent elevation in estimated pulmonary artery pressure. Chest. 2009;136:1202–1210. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2988
138.
Yusuf S, Al-Saady N, Camm AJ. 5-hydroxytryptamine and atrial fibrillation: how significant is this piece in the puzzle? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:209–214.
139.
Spronk HM, De Jong AM, Verheule S, De Boer HC, Maass AH, Lau DH, Rienstra M, van Hunnik A, Kuiper M, Lumeij S, et al. Hypercoagulability causes atrial fibrosis and promotes atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:38–50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw119
140.
Koć M, Kostrubiec M, Elikowski W, Meneveau N, Lankeit M, Grifoni S, Kuch-Wocial A, Petris A, Zaborska B, Stefanović BS, et al.; RiHTER Investigators. Outcome of patients with right heart thrombi: the Right Heart Thrombi European Registry. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:869–875. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00819-2015
141.
Enga KF, Rye-Holmboe I, Hald EM, Løchen ML, Mathiesen EB, Njølstad I, Wilsgaard T, Braekkan SK, Hansen JB. Atrial fibrillation and future risk of venous thromboembolism:the Tromsø study. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13:10–16. doi: 10.1111/jth.12762
142.
Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585–593. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.6.585
143.
Stein PD, Matta F, Goldman J. Obesity and pulmonary embolism: the mounting evidence of risk and the mortality paradox. Thromb Res. 2011;128:518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.10.019
144.
Kuipers S, Klein Klouwenberg PM, Cremer OL. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18:688. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0688-5
145.
Lindhardsen J, Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Madsen OR, Olesen JB, Svendsen JH, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen PR. Risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke in rheumatoid arthritis: Danish nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344:e1257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1257
146.
Barra SN, Paiva LV, Providência R, Fernandes A, Leitão Marques A. Atrial fibrillation in acute pulmonary embolism: prognostic considerations. Emerg Med J. 2014;31:308–312. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202089
147.
Ng AC, Adikari D, Yuan D, Lau JK, Yong AS, Chow V, Kritharides L. The Prevalence and Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150448
148.
Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, et al.; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:120–129. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575
149.
Vanassche T, Lauw MN, Eikelboom JW, Healey JS, Hart RG, Alings M, Avezum A, Díaz R, Hohnloser SH, Lewis BS, et al. Risk of ischaemic stroke according to pattern of atrial fibrillation: analysis of 6563 aspirin-treated patients in ACTIVE-A and AVERROES. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:281–27a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu307
150.
Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137:263–272. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584
151.
Yaranov DM, Smyrlis A, Usatii N, Butler A, Petrini JR, Mendez J, Warshofsky MK. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on frequency of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:461–465. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.11.027
152.
Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Chang Y, Singer DE, Lokhnygina Y, Go AS, Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Halperin JL, Breithardt G, et al.; ROCKET AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Renal dysfunction as a predictor of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: validation of the R(2)CHADS(2) index in the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) and ATRIA (AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation) study cohorts. Circulation. 2013;127:224–232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.107128
153.
Fanola CL, Ruff CT, Murphy SA, Jin J, Duggal A, Babilonia NA, Sritara P, Mercuri MF, Kamphuisen PW, Antman EM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients With Active Malignancy and Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008987. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008987
154.
Kottkamp H. Fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy: a specific disease/syndrome supplying substrates for atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, sinus node disease, AV node disease, and thromboembolic complications. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23:797–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02341.x
155.
Daccarett M, Badger TJ, Akoum N, Burgon NS, Mahnkopf C, Vergara G, Kholmovski E, McGann CJ, Parker D, Brachmann J, et al. Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:831–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.049
156.
Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995;92:835–841. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.4.835
157.
van Bree MD, Roos YB, van der Bilt IA, Wilde AA, Sprengers ME, de Gans K, Vergouwen MD. Prevalence and characterization of ECG abnormalities after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2010;12:50–55. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9283-z
158.
Wang Y, Qian Y, Smerin D, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Xiong X. Newly Detected Atrial Fibrillation after Acute Stroke: A Narrative Review of Causes and Implications. Cardiology. 2019;144:1–10.
159.
Brambatti M, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Morillo CA, Capucci A, Muto C, Lau CP, Van Gelder IC, Hohnloser SH, Carlson M, et al.; ASSERT Investigators. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation. 2014;129:2094–2099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007825
160.
Camen S, Ojeda FM, Niiranen T, Gianfagna F, Vishram-Nielsen JK, Costanzo S, Söderberg S, Vartiainen E, Donati MB, Løchen ML, et al. Temporal relations between atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke and their prognostic impact on mortality. Europace. 2020;22:522–529. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz312
161.
Poggesi A, Inzitari D, Pantoni L. Atrial Fibrillation and Cognition: Epidemiological Data and Possible Mechanisms. Stroke. 2015;46:3316–3321. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008225
162.
Kalantarian S, Stern TA, Mansour M, Ruskin JN. Cognitive impairment associated with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:338–346. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00007
163.
Saglietto A, Matta M, Gaita F, Jacobs V, Bunch TJ, Anselmino M. Stroke-independent contribution of atrial fibrillation to dementia: a meta-analysis. Open Heart. 2019;6:e000984. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000984
164.
Park H, Hildreth A, Thomson R, O’Connell J. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation and cognitive decline: a longitudinal cohort study. Age Ageing. 2007;36:157–163. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl164
165.
Knecht S, Oelschläger C, Duning T, Lohmann H, Albers J, Stehling C, Heindel W, Breithardt G, Berger K, Ringelstein EB, et al. Atrial fibrillation in stroke-free patients is associated with memory impairment and hippocampal atrophy. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2125–2132. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn341
166.
Jefferson AL, Himali JJ, Au R, Seshadri S, Decarli C, O’Donnell CJ, Wolf PA, Manning WJ, Beiser AS, Benjamin EJ. Relation of left ventricular ejection fraction to cognitive aging (from the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1346–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.056
167.
de Bruijn RF, Portegies ML, Leening MJ, Bos MJ, Hofman A, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ, Vernooij MW, Franco OH, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction increases the risk of stroke and dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 2015;84:833–840. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001289
168.
Phillips KP. Role of Inflammation in Initiation and Perpetuation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of the Published Data. J Atr Fibrillation. 2013;6:935. doi: 10.4022/jafib.935
169.
Conen D, Wong JA, Sandhu RK, Cook NR, Lee IM, Buring JE, Albert CM. Risk of Malignant Cancer Among Women With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:389–396. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0280
170.
Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, Konety SH. Shared Risk Factors in Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. Circulation. 2016;133:1104–1114. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020406
171.
Clemens A, Strack A, Noack H, Konstantinides S, Brueckmann M, Lip GY. Anticoagulant-related gastrointestinal bleeding–could this facilitate early detection of benign or malignant gastrointestinal lesions? Ann Med. 2014;46:672–678. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2014.952327
172.
Beck-Nielsen J, Sorensen HR, Alstrup P. Atrial fibrillation following thoracotomy for non-cardiac diseases, in particular cancer of the lung. Acta Med Scand. 1973;193:425–429. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1973.tb10604.x
173.
Tamargo J, Caballero R, Delpón E. Drug-induced atrial fibrillation. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012;11:615–634. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2012.698609
174.
Baptiste F, Cautela J, Ancedy Y, Resseguier N, Aurran T, Farnault L, Escudier M, Ammar C, Gaubert M, Dolladille C, et al. High incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients treated with ibrutinib. Open Heart. 2019;6:e001049. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001049
175.
Hu YF, Liu CJ, Chang PM, Tsao HM, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Tuan TC, Li CH, Chao TF, et al. Incident thromboembolism and heart failure associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in cancer patients. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165:355–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.08.036
176.
Amioka M, Sairaku A, Ochi T, Okada T, Asaoku H, Kyo T, Kihara Y. Prognostic Significance of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Treated With Anthracyclines. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:1386–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.049
177.
Zaorsky NG, Churilla TM, Egleston BL, Fisher SG, Ridge JA, Horwitz EM, Meyer JE. Causes of death among cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:400–407. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw604
178.
Melloni C, Shrader P, Carver J, Piccini JP, Thomas L, Fonarow GC, Ansell J, Gersh B, Go AS, Hylek E, et al.; ORBIT-AF Steering Committee. Management and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer: the ORBIT-AF registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3:192–197. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx004
179.
Schumacher K, Dagres N, Hindricks G, Husser D, Bollmann A, Kornej J. Characteristics of PR interval as predictor for atrial fibrillation: association with biomarkers and outcomes. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106:767–775. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1109-y
180.
D’Ascenzo F, Corleto A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Anselmino M, Ferraris F, di Biase L, Natale A, Hunter RJ, Schilling RJ, Miyazaki S, et al. Which are the most reliable predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter ablation?: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1984–1989. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.008
181.
Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Jais P, Akoum N, Marchlinski F, Kholmovski E, Burgon N, Hu N, Mont L, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311:498–506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3
182.
Seewöster T, Spampinato RA, Sommer P, Lindemann F, Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Hindricks G, Kornej J. Left atrial size and total atrial emptying fraction in atrial fibrillation progression. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1605–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.014
183.
Christophersen IE, Ellinor PT. Genetics of atrial fibrillation: from families to genomes. J Hum Genet. 2016;61:61–70. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.44
184.
Choi SH, Weng LC, Roselli C, Lin H, Haggerty CM, Shoemaker MB, Barnard J, Arking DE, Chasman DI, Albert CM, et al.; DiscovEHR study and the NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium. Association Between Titin Loss-of-Function Variants and Early-Onset Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2018;320:2354–2364. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18179
185.
Nielsen JB, Thorolfsdottir RB, Fritsche LG, Zhou W, Skov MW, Graham SE, Herron TJ, McCarthy S, Schmidt EM, Sveinbjornsson G, et al. Genome-wide association study of 1 million people identifies 111 loci for atrial fibrillation. bioRxiv. 2018:242149.
186.
Roselli C, Chaffin MD, Weng LC, Aeschbacher S, Ahlberg G, Albert CM, Almgren P, Alonso A, Anderson CD, Aragam KG, et al. Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study for atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1225–1233. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0133-9
187.
Weng LC, Preis SR, Hulme OL, Larson MG, Choi SH, Wang B, Trinquart L, McManus DD, Staerk L, Lin H, et al. Genetic Predisposition, Clinical Risk Factor Burden, and Lifetime Risk of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2018;137:1027–1038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031431
188.
Ko D, Benson MD, Ngo D, Yang Q, Larson MG, Wang TJ, Trinquart L, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, et al. Proteomics Profiling and Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: Framingham Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e010976. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010976
189.
Lin H, Yin X, Xie Z, Lunetta KL, Lubitz SA, Larson MG, Ko D, Magnani JW, Mendelson MM, Liu C, et al. Methylome-wide Association Study of Atrial Fibrillation in Framingham Heart Study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40377. doi: 10.1038/srep40377
190.
Yan ZT, Huang JM, Luo WL, Liu JW, Zhou K. Combined metabolic, phenomic and genomic data to prioritize atrial fibrillation-related metabolites. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17:3929–3934. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7443
191.
Mayr M, Yusuf S, Weir G, Chung YL, Mayr U, Yin X, Ladroue C, Madhu B, Roberts N, De Souza A, et al. Combined metabolomic and proteomic analysis of human atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.055
192.
Yu L, Meng G, Huang B, Zhou X, Stavrakis S, Wang M, Li X, Zhou L, Wang Y, Wang M, et al. A potential relationship between gut microbes and atrial fibrillation: Trimethylamine N-oxide, a gut microbe-derived metabolite, facilitates the progression of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2018;255:92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.071
193.
Eapen ZJ, Turakhia MP, McConnell MV, Graham G, Dunn P, Tiner C, Rich C, Harrington RA, Peterson ED, Wayte P. Defining a mobile health roadmap for cardiovascular health and disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003119
194.
Milani RV, Lavie CJ, Bober RM, Milani AR, Ventura HO. Improving Hypertension Control and Patient Engagement Using Digital Tools. Am J Med. 2017;130:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.07.029
195.
Turakhia MP, Kaiser DW. Transforming the care of atrial fibrillation with mobile health. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47:45–50. doi: 10.1007/s10840-016-0136-3
196.
Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, Elshaug AG, Glasziou P, Heath I, Nagpal S, Saini V, Srivastava D, Chalmers K, et al. Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. Lancet. 2017;390:156–168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5
197.
Turakhia MP, Shafrin J, Bognar K, Goldman DP, Mendys PM, Abdulsattar Y, Wiederkehr D, Trocio J. Economic Burden of Undiagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:733–739. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.045
198.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, Venugopalan S, Widner K, Madams T, Cuadros J, et al. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402–2410. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17216
199.
Hill NR, Ayoubkhani D, McEwan P, Sugrue DM, Farooqui U, Lister S, Lumley M, Bakhai A, Cohen AT, O’Neill M, et al. Predicting atrial fibrillation in primary care using machine learning. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224582
200.
Ambale-Venkatesh B, Yang X, Wu CO, Liu K, Hundley WG, McClelland R, Gomes AS, Folsom AR, Shea S, Guallar E, et al. Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2017;121:1092–1101. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311312
201.
Chua W, Purmah Y, Cardoso VR, Gkoutos GV, Tull SP, Neculau G, Thomas MR, Kotecha D, Lip GYH, Kirchhof P, et al. Data-driven discovery and validation of circulating blood-based biomarkers associated with prevalent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1268–1276. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy815
202.
Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F, Asirvatham SJ, Deshmukh AJ, Gersh BJ, Carter RE, Yao X, Rabinstein AA, Erickson BJ, et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet. 2019;394:861–867. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31721-0
203.
Moss TJ, Calland JF, Enfield KB, Gomez-Manjarres DC, Ruminski C, DiMarco JP, Lake DE, Moorman JR. New-onset atrial fibrillation in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:790–797. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002325
204.
Marcus PM, Prorok PC, Miller AB, DeVoto EJ, Kramer BS. Conceptualizing overdiagnosis in cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv014
205.
Parikh RB, Teeple S, Navathe AS. Addressing bias in artificial intelligence in health care [published online November 22, 2019]. JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18058

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation Research
Go to Circulation Research
Circulation Research
Pages: 4 - 20
PubMed: 32716709

History

Published online: 18 June 2020
Published in print: 19 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. artificial intelligence
  2. atrial fibrillation
  3. incidence
  4. prevalence
  5. risk factors

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts & Sections of Cardiovascular Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Boston Medical Center (J.K., E.J.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, MA
Christin S. Börschel*
Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (C.B., R.B.S.)
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck (C.B., R.B.S.).
From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts & Sections of Cardiovascular Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Boston Medical Center (J.K., E.J.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, MA
Department of Epidemiology (E.J.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, MA
Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (C.B., R.B.S.)
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck (C.B., R.B.S.).

Notes

*
J.K. and C.B. contributed equally to this article.
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 15.
The Data Supplement is available with this article at Supplemental Material.
Correspondence to: Jelena Kornej, MD, MSc, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Boston, MA 02118. Email [email protected]

Disclosures

Starting January 2020, E.J. Benjamin serves as an uncompensated member for the MyHeartLab Steering Committee. The MyHeartLab Study is a Principal Investigator (PI)–initiated study from the University of California San Francisco: PI, Jeffrey Olgin, MD, through a research grant to University of California, San Francisco from Samsung.

Sources of Funding

This project has received funding from the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 838259) for J. Kornej; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.; 81651/100) for C. Börschel; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI): R01HL128914; 2R01 HL092577; 1R01 HL141434 01A1; 2U54HL120163; American Heart Association, 18SFRN34110082; Robert Wood Johnson Grant 74624 for E.J. Benjamin; and European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 648131), from the European Union`s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No 847770 (AFFECT-EU [Digital, Risk-Based Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Community]), and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.; 81Z1710103) for R.B. Schnabel.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Atrial fibrillation management in older hospitalized patients: Evidence of a poor oral anticoagulants prescriptive attitude from the Italian REPOSI registry, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 128, (105602), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105602
    Crossref
  2. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: A Bibliometric Analysis, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66925
    Crossref
  3. Recent Advances in the Management of Non-rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65835
    Crossref
  4. Cardioembolic Stroke Three Days Post-Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic AtriClip in a Patient With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64459
    Crossref
  5. Prophylactic Left Atrial Appendage Ligation During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Allows Safe Avoidance of Anticoagulation Regardless of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59876
    Crossref
  6. Revolutionizing Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: The Robotic Convergent Plus Procedure, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57835
    Crossref
  7. Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54252
    Crossref
  8. Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Regimens of Rivaroxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Cureus, (2024).https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51541
    Crossref
  9. Review of methods for detecting electrode-tissue contact status during atrial fibrillation ablation, Progress in Medical Devices, (2024).https://doi.org/10.61189/650204jodubt
    Crossref
  10. Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Prevention, Atrial Fibrillation - Current Management and Practice [Working Title], (2024).https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006629
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in the 21st Century
Circulation Research
  • Vol. 127
  • No. 1

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation Research
  • Vol. 127
  • No. 1
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response