Skip main navigation

Microanatomy of the Human Atherosclerotic Plaque by Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Originally published Research. 2020;127:1437–1455



Atherosclerotic lesions are known for their cellular heterogeneity, yet the molecular complexity within the cells of human plaques has not been fully assessed.


Using single-cell transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility, we gained a better understanding of the pathophysiology underlying human atherosclerosis.

Methods and Results:

We performed single-cell RNA and single-cell ATAC sequencing on human carotid atherosclerotic plaques to define the cells at play and determine their transcriptomic and epigenomic characteristics. We identified 14 distinct cell populations including endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, mast cells, B cells, myeloid cells, and T cells and identified multiple cellular activation states and suggested cellular interconversions. Within the endothelial cell population, we defined subsets with angiogenic capacity plus clear signs of endothelial to mesenchymal transition. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells showed activation-based subclasses, each with a gradual decline from a cytotoxic to a more quiescent phenotype. Myeloid cells included 2 populations of proinflammatory macrophages showing IL (interleukin) 1B or TNF (tumor necrosis factor) expression as well as a foam cell-like population expressing TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) and displaying a fibrosis-promoting phenotype. ATACseq data identified specific transcription factors associated with the myeloid subpopulation and T cell cytokine profiles underlying mutual activation between both cell types. Finally, cardiovascular disease susceptibility genes identified using public genome-wide association studies data were particularly enriched in lesional macrophages, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells.


This study provides a transcriptome-based cellular landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques and highlights cellular plasticity and intercellular communication at the site of disease. This detailed definition of cell communities at play in atherosclerosis will facilitate cell-based mapping of novel interventional targets with direct functional relevance for the treatment of human disease.


Meet the First Author, see p 1346

Atherosclerosis is characterized by chronic, lipid-driven vascular inflammation and is the main underlying cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD).1 Many studies have defined cellular profiles of human atherosclerosis based on single or several marker proteins, but detailed description of the cells involved in the pathophysiology of atherogenesis is lacking. Moreover, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified many loci associated with increased risk for CVD, but the translation of these findings into new therapies2 has been hampered by the lack of information on specific cell communities in atherosclerotic plaques and the cell-specific expression patterns of druggable candidate genes at the site of disease. Recently, the immune cell composition of murine and human aortic atherosclerotic plaques has been described using cytometry by time of flight and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq).3–7 Yet, the full cellular composition of human carotid plaques, including nonimmune cells, remains elusive. Therefore, we performed scRNA-seq and single-cell ATAC sequencing (scATAC-seq) on advanced human atherosclerotic plaques obtained during carotid endarterectomy and report a comprehensive overview of the various cell types in plaques and their activation status, which reveals an active, ongoing inflammation and multiple cellular interactions as well as cellular plasticity with respect to endothelial cells (EC) and macrophages. In addition, we identified cell type–specific expression of GWAS risk loci for CVD.


In silico data analysis was performed using custom R Scripts (R version 3.5.3) designed especially for this research or based on the recommended pipelines from the preexisting packages listed in the individual segments above. R scripts are available on GitHub []. Other data is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Please see the Data Supplement for detailed methods.


Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies 14 Distinct Cell Populations in Human Atherosclerotic Plaques

To examine the transcriptome of human atherosclerotic plaques, carotid endarterectomy tissue from 18 patients (77% male sex) was enzymatically digested, viable nucleated cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS; Figure 1A, Figure IA, Table I in the Data Supplement), and scRNA-seq libraries were prepared. After filtering cells based on the number of reported genes (see Methods in the Data Supplement), we applied unbiased clustering on 3282 cells, identifying 14 cell populations (Figure 1B and 1C, Table II in the Data Supplement). Correlation of our scRNA-seq data with bulk RNA-seq data (Figure IB in the Data Supplement) and examining interpatient variation of cluster distribution (Figure IC in the Data Supplement) and size (Figure ID in the Data Supplement) confirmed uniformity of the data except for patient 1. We assigned a cell type to each cluster based on differential expression of established lineage markers (Figure 1B and 1D). Cluster composition did not differ between sexes (Figure IE in the Data Supplement) and cluster identities were confirmed by correlation with bulk RNA-seq datasets (Figure 1E).8 We observed 3 nonimmune cell clusters (clusters 8, 9, and 10; expressing CD34 and ACTA2 [actin alpha 2, smooth muscle])9,10 and 11 leukocyte clusters (Figure 1B and 1D). The latter included 5 lymphocyte clusters (clusters 0, 1, 3, 4, and 11; expressing CD3E, CD4, CD8, CD79A),11,12 5 myeloid clusters (clusters 5, 6, 7, 12 and 13; expressing CD14, CD68, KIT),13–16 and 1 cluster containing a mixture of cells (cluster 2), which did not show a clear cell type–defining expression profile but had similar gene expression levels as other clusters and seemed to mainly contain apoptotic myeloid and T cells (Figure 1B and 1D; Figure II A-D in the Data Supplement). T cells appeared to be the most abundant population in our data set, encompassing 52.4% of all analyzed cells, whereas the myeloid populations represented 18.5% of all cells (Figure IIE in the Data Supplement). Histological analysis of matched samples confirmed that CD3+ T cells indeed outnumbered the CD68+ cells, which represent macrophages and to a limited extend smooth muscle cells (SMCs),17 in the studied samples (number of CD3+ T cells: 1880±449 versus number of CD68+ cells: 870±135; Figure IIF in the Data Supplement).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. CCA clustering and tSNE visualization revealed 14 distinct populations.A, Experimental setup: plaque samples obtained from endarterectomy procedures were digested, single viable cells were fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) sorted in a polymerase chain reaction plate, and CEL-seq2 was performed. B, Heatmap of top marker genes per cluster. C, tSNE visualization of clustering revealed 14 cell populations. Population identities were determined based on marker gene expression. D, Violin plots of signature genes confirmed population identities, as well as (E) by similarity to known cell type in reference RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data sets. ACTA2 indicates alpha actin 2, smooth muscle; DC, dendritic cell; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; IHC, immunohistochemistry; KIT, c-KIT; NK, natural killer; scRNAseq, single-cell RNA sequencing; and tSNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding.

ECs Exhibited a Gene Expression Profile Indicative of Activation and Potential Transdifferentiation

ECs were represented by cluster 9; expressing COL4A1, (collagen type IV alpha 1 chain) COL4A2, SPARCL1, and PLVAP, and cluster 10; expressing MPZL2, SULF1, VWF, and EDN1 (Figure 1B and 1C, Table II in the Data Supplement). Isolating and reclustering these clusters revealed 4 distinct subclasses (E.0-E.3, E indicates EC, Figure 2A, Table II in the Data Supplement). We could assign EC phenotypes to the subclasses by assessing marker genes (Figure 2B). E.0, E.1, and E.2 displayed classical endothelial markers CD34 and PECAM1, and the vascular endothelial marker TIE1. E.0 showed distinct expression of ACKR1, which has been associated with venous ECs and the vasa vasorum in mice18,19 and PRCP,20 involved in angiogenesis and regeneration of damaged endothelium (Figure 2B and 2C). E.1 and E.2 separated on expression of extracellular matrix genes in E.1 and cell mobility markers FGF18 and HEG1 in E.2. Both populations expressed VCAM1 (Figure 2C), which is expressed by activated endothelium and facilitates adhesion and transmigration of leukocytes, such as monocytes and T cells.21 Together, this suggests that E.0, E.1, and E.2 represent activated endothelium which actively aggravates inflammation in the advanced lesion by cell adhesion and neovascularization and mediating leukocyte extravasation.22 Of note, subclass E.3 expressed typical SMC markers, such as ACTA2, NOTCH3, and MYH11, next to the aforementioned endothelial markers (Figure 2C). This, combined with its clustering among the EC clusters and enrichment of transitory and SMC-related pathways (Figure 2D), indicated that this subset may be undergoing endothelial to mesenchymal transition or vice-versa. To validate these findings, we looked into the expression of ACTA2 and CD34 on sequential histological slides. Figure 2E shows cells lining the intraplaque vasculature that shows overlapping expression.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Subclustering of endothelial cells revealed 4 distinct populations.A, tSNE visualization of clustering revealed 4 distinct endothelial cell populations. B, Heatmap of top marker genes per cluster. C, Violin plots of endothelial cell-specific markers, genes involved in endothelial cell angiogenesis and activation, and genes that are associated with endothelial to mesenchymal transition. D, Top pathways associated with cluster E.3. E, Examples of ACTA2 (actin alpha 2, smooth muscle) and CD34 expression in a monolayer of cells lining intraplaque vasculature on sequential histological slides of 2 different patients. Scale bars represent 100 µm. ACKR1 indicates atypical chemokine receptor 1; ACTA2, actin alpha 2, smooth muscle; aSMA, actin alpha 2, smooth muscle; BMP4, bone morphogenetic protein 4; DKK2, dickkopf-related protein 2; E, endothelial cell; FDR, false discovery rate; FGF18, fibroblast growth factor 18; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; MYH11, myosin heavy chain 11; NOTCH3, notch receptor 3; tSNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding; and VCAM1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.

Synthetic Phenotype Dominates in Plaque Smooth Muscle Cells

SMCs were represented by cluster 8, expressing MYH11, PDGFRB, NOTCH3, and MFAP423–25 (Figure 1B and 1C, Table II in the Data Supplement), which separated into 2 subclasses (Figure IIIA in the Data Supplement): a cluster of SMCs with contractile characteristics (cluster S.1; expressing MYH11, ACTA2 and TAGLN) and a cluster of synthetic-like SMCs (cluster S.0; expressing COL1A1, MGP and COL3A1)26 (Figure IIIB and IIIC and Table II in the Data Supplement). The low expression of typical SMC markers in cluster S.0 and upregulation of extracellular matrix genes suggested that a subset of these cells were derived from the established cap portion of the plaque. A limited number of cells within this cluster was KLF4+ (Figure IIID in the Data Supplement), indicative of differentiation from vascular smooth muscle cells into either a synthetic or macrophage-like phenotype.

Intraplaque T Cells Are Defined by Activation Status

Lymphocyte clusters consisted of one small, but homogenous cluster of B cells (cluster 11; expressing CD79A, FCER2, CD22, and CD79B)27–29 (Figure 1B and 1C, Table II in the Data Supplement), and 4 T-cell clusters. To define the T cells in more detail, we assessed the CD4+ T cells (expression CD4>CD8) and the CD8+ T cells (expression CD8>CD4) from CD3 enriched clusters 0, 1, 3, and 4. Isolating and reclustering the CD4+ T cells revealed 5 subclasses (CD4.0–CD4.4, Figure 3A, Table II in the Data Supplement) of which the primary difference was their activation state rather than the transcription factors and cytokines commonly used to define CD4+ T-helper (TH) subsets (Figure 3B and 3C). CD4.0 and CD4.1 exerted a cytotoxic gene expression profile exemplified by expression of GZMA, GZMK, and PRF1. Apart from these cytotoxic transcripts, cells in CD4.0 also showed very little CD28 expression and some GZMB expression, suggesting that these cells are cytotoxic CD4+CD28null cells that have previously been correlated with unstable angina and increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.30,31 In addition, gene expression in this cluster confirmed an enrichment in proinflammatory pathways associated with adaptive immune responses (Figure 3D). Using flow cytometry, we confirmed the cytotoxic character of the CD4+CD28null cells, which showed that significantly more CD4+CD28 cells contained granzyme B as compared to the CD4+CD28+ cells (Figure 3E, Figure IVA in the Data Supplement). CD4.2 and CD4.4 were characterized by expression of IL7R (interleukin 7 receptor), LEF1, and SELL, associated with a naïve and central-memory phenotype. The final CD4+ subclass (CD4.3) was identified as a regulatory T-cell cluster based on the expression of the classical markers FOXP3 (forkhead box P3), IL2RA (CD25), and CTLA432 (Figure 3B, Table II in the Data Supplement). Interestingly, we also found some coexpression of FOXP3 with transcription factors RORA (RAR Related Orphan Receptor A) and GATA3 (GATA binding protein 3) in this cluster (Figure IVB in the Data Supplement), which has, respectively, been associated with the enhanced immunosuppressive function of regulatory T cells33 and with the prevention of polarization towards other TH subsets.34 Expression of the TH cell subset–specific transcription factors TBX21 (Tbet [T-box transcription factor 21]; Th1), GATA3 (Th2), and RORC (RORγT; Th17) was not linked to a specific cluster (Figure IVC in the Data Supplement), which seems to be a common phenomenon when dealing with T-cell scRNA-seq data.35,36 By analyzing the CD4+ T cells in a clustering-independent method by selecting all cells that have the expression of both CD3E and CD4 and subsequently analyzing the expression of single TH-specific transcription factors, we find that a large population of T cells did not express a clear signal of the transcription factors (Figure IVD in the Data Supplement).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Subclustering of CD4+ T cells revealed 5 distinct populations.A, tSNE visualization of clustering revealed 5 distinct CD4+ T-cell populations. B, Dot plot of cluster-identifying genes and T-cell transcription factors. C, Violin plots of CD4.0 characterizing cytotoxic genes. D, Flow cytometry analysis of Granzyme B production by CD4+CD28 cells on defrosted plaque samples. E, Top pathways associated with cluster CD4.0. Data shown as mean±SD (n=10; obtained from cohort 1 and 2). *P<0.05. FDR indicates false discovery rate; FOXP3, forkhead box P3; GZMK, granzyme K; IL7R, interleukin 7 receptor; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; LEF1, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1; PD1, programmed cell death protein 1;PRF1, perforin 1; TCR, T cell receptor; and tSNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding.

Analysis of CD8+ T cells revealed 3 subclasses (Figure VA and VB in the Data Supplement), which were similar to CD4+ T cells defined by differences in activation state. CD8.0 was identified as an effector-memory subset, characterized by expression of GZMK, GZMA, and CD69, indicating recent T-cell receptor activity (Figure VC in the Data Supplement). A clear, terminally differentiated, cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell profile was observed in CD8.1, which showed expression of GZMB, TBX21, NKG7, GNLY, ZNF683, and CX3CR1, and in line, this subclass lacked CD69 expression. Finally, CD8.2 displayed a quiescent, central-memory CD8+ T-cell phenotype with expression of LEF1, SELL, IL7R, and LTB. In contrast to Fernandez et al7 and previous scRNA-seq data obtained from various cancers, we did not detect a clear exhausted phenotype in the CD8+ T cells.35–37 The CD8 clusters with reduced cytotoxic potential show expression of CD69, suggesting recent T cell receptor (TCR) activation and it will be of future interest to examine how these CD8+ populations were activated and how they affect the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. This could indicate that not the cytotoxic but the more quiescent CD8+ T-cell subsets are responding to plaque-specific antigens and may be more relevant in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Using experimental mouse models of atherosclerosis it has been shown that the majority of CD8+ T cells in the plaque are antigen-specific,38 but so far little is known regarding the plaque-antigen(s) they respond to. Whereas CD4+ T cells have been shown to respond to (ox)LDL ([oxidized] low-density lipoprotein) and its related apo B100 peptide, plaque-antigen(s) for CD8+ remain mostly indefinable.39 Therefore, we are unable to define which antigens have activated the T cells in the atherosclerotic lesion.

Both Proinflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Macrophage Populations Reside in the Plaque

Atherosclerotic myeloid cells were represented by 5 clusters. A small, distinct mast cell population was defined by expression of HDC, KIT, CMA1, and TPSAB1.40 The remaining myeloid clusters, cluster 6, 7, 8, and 12, expressed CD14 and CD68 (Figure 1B and 1C) and isolating and reclustering of these cells revealed 5 distinct phenotypes (My.0–My.4 [myeloid cell], Figure 4A, Figure VIA and Table II in the Data Supplement).

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Subclustering of myeloid cells revealed 5 distinct populations.A, tSNE visualization of clustering revealed 5 distinct myeloid populations. B, Violin plots of macrophage-specific activation genes and foam cell markers. C, Top pathways associated with the macrophage clusters. D, Unique pathways per macrophage cluster. E, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of upstream regulators of the macrophage subsets. Both D and E depict data as Z score. F, Circos plots displaying overlap of macrophage clusters with macrophage clusters of murine single-cell RNA sequencing papers. Dotted lines indicate no significant overlap, and solid lines indicate significant overlap. G, Bar graph with top 5 overlapping clusters of human and murine macrophage clusters. ABCG1 indicates ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 1; BCR, B cell receptor; CXCL2, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 2; DC, dendritic cell; FcR, Fc receptor; FDR, false discovery rate; IL, interleukin; ILK, integrin-linked kinase; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; LXR, liver X receptor; My, myeloid cells; NK, natural killer; PD1, programmed cell death protein 1; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TH, T helper; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TREM2, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; tSNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding; and RXR, retinoid X receptor.

My.0, My.1, and My.2 most likely represented different macrophage activation states. Enrichment of proinflammatory marker genes (Figure 4B) and immune and inflammatory pathways (Figure 4C) indicated that subclasses My.0 and My.1 consisted of proinflammatory macrophages. My.0 showed characteristics of recently recruited macrophages (leukocyte transendothelial migration, Figure 4C and leukocyte extravasation signaling, Figure 4D) displaying inflammasome activation based on coexpression of IL1B, CASP1, and CASP4 (Figure 4B, Figure VIB in the Data Supplement). My.1 represented macrophages that differentially expressed tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and toll-like receptors (Figure 4B). Interestingly, both My.0 and My.1 expressed KLF4 (kruppel like factor 4), albeit at a low level, which is known to drive macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype by repressing the NF-κB (nuclear factor κB) gene program.41 Our data may suggest that an inhibitory feedback loop in the proinflammatory macrophage populations is actively mediated by KLF4 expression.

In contrast to My.0 and My.1, My.2 showed absence of clear proinflammatory markers and showed signs of macrophages and foam cells. It expressed foam cell marker genes ABCA1,42ABCG1, MMP9, and OLR143 (Figure 4B, Figure VIA in the Data Supplement), profibrotic markers, such as TREM2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) and CD9,44,45 and the enrichment of metabolic pathways hinted at a shift in metabolism (Figure 4C, bottom). Interestingly, My.2 cells expressed smooth muscle actin (ACTA2), a hallmark of smooth muscle cells, in combination with macrophage markers such as LGALS3 and CD68 (Figure VIC and VID in the Data Supplement). Expression of myeloid lineage TFs (transcription factors) PU.1 (SPI1) and C/EBPß (CEBPB [CCAAT enhancer binding protein beta])46 and absence of SMC lineage TFs MYOCD (myocardin) and MRTF-A (MRTFA [myocardin related transcription factor A])47 in specifically the ACTA2+ cells of My.2 suggests that part of the My.2 myeloid cells gained characteristics of SMCs rather than that it originated from SMCs17 (Figure VIE in the Data Supplement).

To further characterize the 3 subclasses, we next examined pathways differentially enriched per population (Figure 4D) as well as the upstream regulators that possibly govern these populations by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Figure 4E). My.0 and My.1 showed enrichment for classical inflammatory and immune pathways clearly suggesting cellular activation, recruitment, and immune cell interactions driving their phenotype. In line, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis predicted that My.0 and My.1 are mainly controlled by proinflammatory factors, such as IL1A, IFN (interferon) A, IFNG, and IL1B.

My.2 was enriched for metabolic pathways and LXR/RXR (liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor) activation, consistent with a foamy phenotype. Hence, this cluster was uniquely driven by anti-inflammatory pathways such as STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6) and had typical foam cell-related factors including APOE and the LXR family (Nr1h [nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H]: NR1H2,3,4), which interestingly showed some overlap with My.1. The latter may indicate that unlike the more recently recruited My.0, My.1 cells are gaining foamy characteristics.

My.3 is characterized by dendritic cell markers, such as CD1C, CLEC10A, and FCER1A (Figure VIA in the Data Supplement) and this population most likely represents CD1c+ dendritic cells.13,48,49 In line with their dendritic cell phenotype, this cluster showed the highest expression of multiple class II HLA genes indicative of their enhanced activation status as a consequence of antigen-specific interaction with plaque T cells (Figure VIF in the Data Supplement). Cluster My.4 expressed CD3E, GNLY, FOXP3, and CD2, suggesting that My.4 potentially contains regulatory T cells. This misclustering might be a result of comparable CD4 expression levels in T cells and macrophages because myeloid cells frequently expressed CD4 (Figure IE in the Data Supplement).

Finally, we compared our macrophage subclasses with monocyte and macrophage populations from 4 recent articles on scRNA-seq analysis of atherosclerotic plaques in mice.3–6 Eight mouse populations showed significant overlap with our human subclasses (Figure 4F). My.0 showed no statistically significant overlap, but most resembled inflammatory mouse macrophages (Figure 4G). My.1 resembled inflammatory, resident-like mouse macrophages, and My.2 overlapped with foamy, anti-inflammatory, Trem2+ macrophages. Together, this confirms the recently migrated and embedded inflammatory phenotypes we defined, respectively, for My.0 and My.1 and matches the foamy phenotype we saw in My.2. It also showcases a decent concordance between human patients and mouse models in relation to cell type diversity.

Intercellular Communication Drives Inflammation Within the Plaque

We next examined potential ligand-receptor interactions between cell types to predict intercellular communication within the lesion based on CellPhone DB v2.0.50 Lymphocytes and mast cells showed the lowest absolute numbers of potential interactions while myeloid, endothelial, and SMCs displayed higher numbers of interactions (Figure 5A). The low interaction between myeloid and T cells may be a consequence of the apparent lack of detection of TCR-related genes (TRA, TRB, TRG) in our scRNA-seq dataset and the fact that CD4-class II and CD8-class I interactions are not included in this database.

Subsequently, we specifically examined the top unique interactions within the myeloid populations, split by myeloid ligands (Figure 5B) and receptors (Figure 5C). We found multiple chemotactic interactions, including endothelial ACKR151 with myeloid-derived CCL2, CXCL8, CCL8, and CXCL1, of which the last 2 ligands were specifically expressed in My.1. We also observed an interaction between CSF1R on all myeloid subsets and CSF1 on ECs, smooth muscle cells, mast cells, and myeloid cells. CCR1 (C-C motif chemokine receptor 1) and CCR5 interacted with CCL5 from both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CXCR4 on B cells interacted with CXCL12 on My.1 cells. In addition, we identified communication patterns that are potentially involved in extravasation of myeloid cells, including CD44 (My)–SELE (EC), SELL (My)–CD34 (EC), SELPLG (My)–SELP, and SELL (both EC). Myeloid cells showed potential capability to attract other leukocytes, for example CCR5+ T cells through expression of CCL3 (My.1). Moreover, myeloid cells were also predicted to interact with T cells leading to mutual activation, through SIRPA (My)–CD47 (T)52ICAM1 (My)–ITGAL (CD8), inducing cytotoxicity and multiple interactions involved in antigen presentation. Lastly, interaction of PDGFB on myeloid subsets with PDGFBR on ECs suggest a possible myeloid-driven induction of angiogenesis, which has been associated with plaque destabilization.53,54

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Ligand-receptor interaction analyses to assess intracellular communication in the plaque.A, Heatmap showing logarithmic interaction scores between all cell subsets. Top quartile of unique ligand-receptor interactions between all cells and myeloid cells for both (B) ligands expressed by myeloid cells and (C) receptors expressed by myeloid cells. E indicates endothelial cells; My, myeloid cells; and SMC, smooth muscle cells.

Chromatin Accessibility of Myeloid and T-Cell Populations Reveals Transcription Factors Involved in Gene Regulation

Next, we aimed to further define the genomic landscape that accounts for the obtained cluster-specific patterns of gene expression and potentially uncover disease driving transcription factors. Using scATAC-seq, we examined the open chromatin promoter and enhancer landscape of myeloid and T cells in human plaques. We identified 4 myeloid and 5 T cell clusters by scATAC-seq. Population label transfer from scRNA-seq to scATAC-seq populations showed good agreement with the native scATAC-seq cluster borders and retrieved the majority of the scRNA-seq populations (Figure 6A and 6B). Open chromatin at macrophage (CSF1R, IL1B) and T cell–specific genes (NKG7), as well as enrichment of motifs of cell type TFs for macrophages and T cells (SPI155 and ETS156), confirmed the delineation between cell types (Figure 6C and 6D). Transferred myeloid populations were reclustered analogous to the scRNA-seq clusters (Figure 6E).

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Chromatin accessibility of myeloid cells in human atherosclerotic plaques analyzed using single-cell ATAC sequencing (scATAC-seq).A, tSNE visualization of myeloid and T-cell clusters based on scATAC-seq. B, Projection of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) myeloid and T-cell labels over the scATAC-seq clusters. C, tSNE visualization of cell type–specific accessible gene loci. D, tSNE visualization of cell type–specific transcription factor motifs enriched in open chromatin regions. E, tSNE visualization of subclustered scATAC-seq myeloid clusters. F, Heatmap showing the top differential open chromatin TF motifs by chromVAR, with subcluster specific accessible TF motifs visualized as tSNE. G, IRF9 motif. H, Pseudobulk genome browser visualization identifying the open chromatin regions of IRF9 in different myeloid subsets. I, RARA:RXRG, and LXR (liver X receptor): RXR (retinoid X receptor) motifs. J, Pseudobulk genome browser visualization identifying open chromatin regions of NRIH3 (encoding LXRα) in different myeloid subsets. K, Violin plot of NR1H3 (nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H) gene expression from myeloid scRNA-seq data. ETS1 indicates ETS proto-oncogene 1; IRF, interferon regulatory factor; KLF, kruppel like factor 4; NFATC3, nuclear factor of activated T cells 3; NR1H3, nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H member 3; PWM, position weight matrix; tSNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding; RARA, retinoic acid receptor alpha; and RXRG, retinoid X receptor gamma.

IRF4 has been shown to be a CD1c+ dendritic cell-specific transcriptional regulator57 and its motif was indeed enriched in My.3 (Figure 6F). In line, we found specific open chromatin at the promoter region of IL12A, the subunit that is specific for the cytokine IL12, in all myeloid populations and an enhancer specifically in My.3 dendritic cells (Figure VIIE in the Data Supplement). IL12 is required to induce a proinflammatory, TH1-like cytotoxic phenotype of T cells and actively induces atherosclerosis.58,59 Potentially, as a result of the My.3-specific IL12, we observed open chromatin at the IFNG and TNF loci in CD4.0, confirming its activated, cytotoxic phenotype and suggesting that this cluster has TH1-like properties (Figure VIIG and VIIH in the Data Supplement). Additionally enriched accessible motifs within the T cells (Figure VIIA and VIIB in the Data Supplement) were observed for the RUNX3 motif in CD4.0, normally a CD8+ T-cell linage specific TF that is also known to induce expression of cytotoxic genes in CD4+ T cells,60–63 as well as the STAT3 motif, which is downstream of IL6 and IL2 signaling. The BATF_JUN motif (Figure VIIC in the Data Supplement) that is known to be critical for effector function in T cells was also enriched in this cluster.64 The effector function could be further confirmed by differential open chromatin of the GZMB and GZMH loci in both CD4.0 and all CD8 clusters (Figure VIID in the Data Supplement) and an open locus at IL2 in CD4.0, CD4.1, and CD8.0.

In line with the scRNA-seq data, My.1 showed enrichment of proinflammatory TF motifs (Figure 6F), which matches the proinflammatory gene expression seen in these cells. This cluster was especially enriched in INF signaling induced TFs including IRF1 (interferon regulatory factor 1), IRF9, STAT1, and STAT2. The STAT1-STAT2 complex is known to interact with IRF9 upon IFNγ stimulation and hence induces the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines as TNF, indicating an IFNγ pathway driven activation, possibly secreted by the T cells.65 Indeed, the IRF9 motif was accessible and the IRF9 locus was open predominantly in My.1 cells (Figure 6G and 6H). Moreover, these IRF and STAT TFs are also key mediators of type I IFN responses which have previously been shown to associate with atherosclerotic disease as well.66

My.0 cells were specifically enriched for the NFATC3 (nuclear factor of activated T cells 3) motif (Figure 6F), a TF that has previously been linked to activated TLR-pathway signaling and has been shown to partially regulate subsequent TNFα and IL-1ß secretion.67,68 Finally, My.2 cells were enriched for anti-inflammatory, foam cell–associated TFs in the scATAC-seq data similar as in the scRNA-seq data. We observed increased chromatin accessibility at loci harboring the KLF4 motif, which next to repressing proinflammatory programs was shown to implement an anti-inflammatory macrophage activation state and is also known to be involved in the transformation of vascular SMCs to macrophages41,46 (Figure 6F). This is in contrast with the scRNA-seq data where KLF4 was expressed at a low level, indicating that while the KLF4 locus is poised, its associated gene program is not necessarily executed in all foamy macrophages. Furthermore, My.2 was enriched for the de novo motif MA1149.1, which was annotated to RAR_RXR, a motif with high similarity to the LXR_RXR motif (Figure 6I). Moreover, LXR_RXR motif accessibility is enriched in My.2 cells and the NR1H3 (LXRα) locus is opened specifically in the My.2 population (Figure 6J). In line, the scRNA-seq data likewise shows NR1H3 upregulation specifically in My.2 (Figure 6K).

We could not map the regulatory T-cell cluster CD4.3 to a scATAC-seq cluster. The FOXP3 locus hardly showed open chromatin in any population in the scATAC-seq data set and neither did the Treg-associated cytokine gene IL10 (Figure VIII and VIIJ in the Data Supplement).

Cell Type–Specific Enrichment of Genes in GWAS Loci.

GWAS have discovered 163 genetic susceptibility loci linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) through literature search and effects on expression.69 However, the challenge remains in identifying the potential causal genes linked to these loci for functional testing as novel therapeutic targets. In part, this is due to the underlying genetic architecture where multiple causative variants in a gene might be involved and variants in linkage disequilibrium only show marginal significance in a GWAS. Another reason is that many of the risk variants are not causal and ambiguously linked to genes. A gene-centric analysis considers all variants in a gene and solves these issues, yet such analyses fail to identify the cells potentially involved. Here, we aimed to (1) identify genes associated with CAD that are (2) also highly expressed in specific cell types, effectively identifying tangible candidates for functional follow-up. To this end, we mapped genes near GWAS loci associated with CAD and assessed expression of these genes across our scRNA-seq cell populations to investigate their expression in disease-relevant tissue. We prioritized 317 protein-coding genes based on the summary statistics of a recent CAD GWAS70 (see Methods and Table III in the Data Supplement). Next, we selected the genes that would best represent each individual cell population. To achieve this, we determined differentially expressed genes (Figure VIII and Methods in the Data Supplement). Three thousand eight hundred seventy-six genes were differentially expressed and differentially expressed genes were grouped into 15 gene expression patterns that best matched the scRNA-seq populations (Figure 7A). We overlapped the 317 CAD-associated genes with the 3876 differentially expressed genes, resulting in a significant overlap (permutation over random data P=2.67×10-5) of 74 genes. These genes are distributed over multiple individual CAD loci (Table III in the Data Supplement), indicating that our methods are robust. We observed a significant accumulation of GWAS linked genes in patterns 3, 8, and 14 (permutation over random data P=0.015, P=0.006, and P=0.015, respectively; Figure 7B). Genes in pattern 3 are associated with higher expression in the EC clusters 9 and 10 (Figure 7C) and consisted of SHE, KCNN3, VAMP5, SEMA3F, HDAC9, GIMAP1, NOS3, and DOCK6. Pattern 8 is hallmarked by gene expression associated with all 4 macrophage populations (Figure 7A) and contained AMPD2, CTSS, IL6R, CAPG, GPX1, GNAI2, TRIB1, SH2B3, FES, C19orf38, and VASP (Figure 7B and 7D). Genes in pattern 14 were predominantly associated with higher expression in both the smooth muscle cell population 8 and the CD34+ EC population 10 (Figure 7E). This pattern contained ITGB, ARHGEF26, CXCL12, PTPN11, COL4A1, COL4A2, KANK2, and GGT5. Our results suggest that macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and ECs are of particular interest as a starting point for functional testing.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Projection of coronary artery disease (CAD) genome-wide association studies (GWAS)–associated genes.A, Heatmap of average expression of 3876 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) divided into 15 gene expression patters that best-matched cluster or cell type identity (for DEG selection, see Figure VIII in the Data Supplement). B, Enrichment of 74 CAD GWAS associated genes across the 15 gene expression patterns. C, D, and E, Heatmap of average relative expression of significantly enriched CAD genes from gene expression pattern no. 3, no. 8, and no. 14, respectively. Asterisk indicates significant enrichment. *P<0.05. ACTA2 indicates actin alpha 2, smooth muscle; and KIT, c-KIT.

Furthermore, given that for many of the genes previously mapped to the 163 CAD loci the mechanisms and cellular expression are still unknown,69 we examine whether these genes show cell type–specific expression in carotid plaques. We found that 24 of the 75 genes previously classified as unknown by Erdmann et al.69 were differentially expressed between cell populations in carotid plaques, and included 3 genes that also showed association with CAD (CHD13, SNRPD2, and ARHGEF26; Table III in the Data Supplement) in our analysis.


In the past 2 years, single-cell technologies have advanced our knowledge of atherosclerosis tremendously. scRNA-seq has been applied to specifically describe the immune cell landscape of murine and human atherosclerotic lesions.3–7 The recent study by Fernandez et al7 gave a first overview of the human immune cell landscape during atherosclerosis by showing a data set based on extensive cytometry by time of flight analyses and by comparing RNA expression profiles of T cells and macrophages in plaque and blood of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.7 They provide insight into which immune cells reside in the plaque and described their different activation states. Yet, both the mouse and human studies lack coverage of nonimmune cell types in the plaque and so far only a limited number of patients have been included in the scRNA-seq studies. Here, we applied scRNA-seq to all live cells in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques of 18 patients and revealed a highly diverse cellular landscape consisting of 14 main cell populations.

We detected a predominance of T cells in the leukocyte population of the human lesions. In contrast, murine scRNA-seq studies describe a more prominent presence of myeloid cells, which may be caused by the previously described declining myeloid content upon progression of human atherosclerotic plaques, whereas T cells reciprocally increase in human atherosclerosis.71,72 Both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets were characterized by their activation state, rather than classical TH or TC subclasses. We could confirm the presence of activated T cells that in the plaque could especially be characterized by the expression of multiple granzymes.7 In addition, we show that these granzymes are not only expressed by CD8+ T cells but also by a substantial number of CD4+ T cells in the plaque. The CD4+ T cells showed a dominant cytotoxic T-cell pool, characterized by expression of PRF1 and multiple granzymes, with granzyme B production confirmed by flow cytometry. The lack of CD28 expression in these cells indicates that this pool constitutes most likely a subset of cytotoxic CD4+CD28null T cells, which has previously been associated with atherosclerosis as they have been detected in peripheral blood of patients with CAD.30,73 Although the presence of a similar TCR clone as observed in peripheral CD4+CD28null cells was found in bulk coronary artery tissue,30,73 we can now confirm the presence of these cells on a single-cell level suggesting a functional role in patients with CVD. As cytokine expression could not be retrieved from the scRNA-seq data, but we were able to detect open chromatin at various cytokine gene loci within the T-cell populations using scATAC-seq suggesting active cytokine genes. Among others, IFNG showed open chromatin in the cytotoxic and effector T-cell subclasses. Apart from confirming the cytotoxic, TH1-like phenotype within the plaque, this also suggests that the proinflammatory macrophage subclasses we observe in our dataset may be primed for classical activation by secretion of IFNγ by the T cells.74 These TH1 cells acting on macrophages may, in turn, be driven by activated CD1c+ dendritic cells that were characterized by an active IL12 gene (ie, open enhancer), which has previously been found on protein level in plaque lysates75,76 and the enrichment of HLA-DR (major histocompability complex, class II, DR beta 1) subtypes.49,77

Each of the macrophage clusters seemed to have been activated differently, one expressing TNF and TLR4, which can be activated by oxLDL and IFNγ,78 as well as IL1B, and the other more selectively expressing IL1B, which correlated with caspase expression suggesting inflammasome activation.79 The recent CANTOS trial (Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Trial), which targeted IL-1β,80 might thus have been effective through impacting on the proinflammatory capacity of the My.0 and My.1 populations within the plaque. Chromatin accessibility confirmed the proinflammatory phenotype of these cells by showing open regions linked to inflammatory transcription factors. Particularly the TNF enriched macrophage cluster My.1 was enriched for motifs from IFN induced TFs (eg, STATs, IRFs), which correlated with our upstream regulator analysis that suggested IFN as drivers of the macrophage phenotype and may be a result of the local IFNγ production by T cells. ln line, the My.0 and My.1 populations correlated with inflammatory and resident-like macrophages as detected in murine lesions.3–6

The IL12-IFNγ axis, as found in our scRNA-seq, data may form an important feature of T-cell activation in the plaque, and subsequent activation of myeloid cells contributes to the inflammation profile within the plaque. This is in line with several experimental studies that show the proatherogenic role of both IL12 and IFNγ in cardiovascular disease.59,81,82

The more anti-inflammatory foam cell–like cluster was characterized by expression of ABC cholesterol efflux transporters and lipid-related genes whose expression is most likely driven by intracellular lipid accumulation.83 The lipid-phenotype was confirmed by the enriched LXR_RXR TF motifs in the scATAC-seq data. LXR is a well-known nuclear receptor, active in foam cells and inducing ABC transporters.46,84 The notice that foam cell formation per se is not proinflammatory is a recent ongoing paradigm shift in the field. Several studies have previously shown clear proinflammatory characteristics of foam cell formation either through engagement of TLRs by oxLDL,85–87 induction of oxidative responses,88 or through other pathways.89–91 However, recent data studying foam cells in in vivo model systems92 or isolating foam cells from murine plaques5 clearly demonstrate that foam cells do not necessarily show proinflammatory characteristics and even may be considered anti-inflammatory.92,93 In line, our data show that cells exhibiting the foam cell–driven LXR activation program do not express high levels of IL1B and TNF. This further confirms that lipid accumulation leads to LXR activation and induces an anti-inflammatory phenotype. We also observed TREM2 and CD9 expression within this cluster, resembling the TREM2+ macrophages found in murine atherosclerosis.4,6 In other tissues, these TREM2+CD9+ macrophages have been described as either lipid-associated macrophages45 in obesity, or as scar associated macrophages44 in liver cirrhosis. Key phenotypes of these cells were shown to involve profibrotic characteristics and this is also of high relevance for human atherosclerosis as it may indicate a plaque stabilizing macrophage population.

Our study provides further supports the notion that trans-differentiation of cells is likely to occur in human atherosclerosis. About a quarter of the My.2 macrophages expressed smooth muscle cell actin, which may indicate derivation from SMCs, or conversely macrophages showing an SMC-like fibrotic phenotype.17,94 Presence of myeloid lineage-specific TF expression in these cells (eg, SPI and CEBPB) and absence of SMC TFs (eg, MYOCD and MRTFA) suggests that the latter is more likely. This is in line with previous reports applying SMC lineage tracing that showed that unidentified SMC-derived cells in atherosclerotic lesions exhibit phenotypes of other cell lineages, including macrophages and mesenchymal stem cells.17,95 Also EC cluster E.3 was characterized by expression of smooth muscle cell markers, such as ACTA2, MYH11, and NOTCH3, suggesting that these cells could be in endothelial to mesenchymal transition. Mature ECs can exhibit considerable heterogeneity and can transdifferentiate into mesenchymal-like cells, a biological process called endothelial to mesenchymal transition.95 There is accumulating evidence that endothelial to mesenchymal transition plays a role in atherosclerotic lesion progression and which has been linked with inflammatory stress and endothelial dysfunction.96,97 Our study shows that distinct EC clusters are present within atherosclerotic lesions and the gene signatures identify a cluster that shares both SMC and EC characteristics further providing human supportive evidence that endothelial to mesenchymal transition may occur in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques.

Apart from cellular plasticity within the endothelial and macrophage population, our study also provides new insights regarding intercellular communication within the plaque and its role in progression of atherosclerosis. We have shown that the within the plaque this was predicted to be most prevalent between myeloid, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells. In addition to previous studies predicting interactions between macrophages and T cells in human lesions,7 we were also able to predict interactions between ECs and SMCs, which were mainly involved with chemotaxis and extravasation of myeloid cells. We also show activation and recruitment of other immune cells, in particular T cells. Future development of therapeutics may benefit from detailing these interactions, providing specific pathways to target.

One of the significant post-GWAS challenges is the identification of candidate genes and pathways with clinical potential.98 Here, we mapped genes based on common variants (minor allele frequency >1%) in susceptibility loci and used single-cell resolution expression in disease-relevant tissue to identify putative targets for future functional follow-up. Our analysis showed enriched expression of CAD-associated genes in myeloid, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, some of these genes are involved in cell-cell interactions, such as SORT1 and CXCL12. Interestingly, the candidate genes did not show a significant overlap with T-cell–specific transcriptional signatures. Our approach is pragmatic in that we explicitly focus on (1) common variants in risk loci associated with CAD, (2) map protein-coding genes that are associated with CAD to these risk loci, and (3) select CAD-associated genes that are also differentially expressed between cell populations. This identifies tangible potential targets as starting points for future functional testing in macrophages, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells. However, we note that rare loss-of-function variants and underrepresented genes may have significant effects on these and other cells. Future studies focusing on loss-of-function variants and under-expressed genes could identify potentially other cell-specific targets.

There are several limitations that come with the use of human plaque endarterectomy samples. The vast majority of carotid endarterectomy samples also contain an inevitable small medial smooth muscle cell layer that potentially has contributed to the contractile smooth muscle cell cluster. There is a fine line between increasing digestion time to isolate more cells and generating a pure sample containing a high number of viable cells. We, therefore, did not exclude that the ratio of cell types that we detected in the plaques based on gene expression profiles was affected by the digestion procedure.

In summary, we provide an in-depth characterization of the highly diverse cellular communities in advanced human atherosclerotic plaques. Based on RNA expression and chromatin accessibility profiles of individual cells, we uncover among others the presence of proinflammatory, cytotoxic T-cell populations, multiple activation states of macrophages and their interactions, and functionally distinct EC populations that all can be considered modulators of human disease development. Furthermore, we show that by incorporating GWAS data, scRNA-seq data can be applied to map CVD susceptibility loci to specific cell populations and define potential patient-driven relevant targets for drug intervention of specific cell types. Our approach thus provides a powerful tool to aid research into the mechanisms underlying human disease and discover novel drug targets for intervention.

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms


coronary artery disease


cardiovascular disease


endothelial cell


fluorescence-activated cell sorting


genome-wide association studies




(oxidized) low-density lipoprotein


single-cell ATAC sequencing


single-cell RNA sequencing


smooth muscle cell


transcription factor


tumor necrosis factor


t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding


Corresponding authors: Johan Kuiper Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Biotherapeutics, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. Email: ; or Menno P.J. de Winther: Amsterdam University Medical Centers–location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Experimental Vascular Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email: ; or Michal Mokry: Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands Email: ; or Gerard Pasterkamp: Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: .

We thank Judith Vivié and Dr Mauro Muraro of Single Cell Discoveries for processing the plates for sequencing. We thank Dr Anouk Wezel and Dr Harm Smeets for sample collection at the Haaglanden Medisch Centrum. We acknowledge Biocenter Finland for infrastructure support. We are grateful to Kimmo Mäkinen for enabling sample acquisition at Kuopio University Hospital. M.A.C. Depuydt, K.H.M. Prange, and L. Slenders drafted the article and designed the figures. G.J. de Borst performed carotid endarterectomy procedures. M.A.C. Depuydt, D. Elbersen, I. Bot, B. Slütter, S.C.A. de Jager, and M. Mokry provided the pilot experiments. D. Elbersen and M.A.C. Depuydt executed the human plaque processing, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and flow cytometry. K.H.M. Prange performed the clustering analyses. L. Slenders performed the genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis with help from M. Mokry, S.W. van der Laan, A. Boltjes, and F.W. Asselbergs, and S.W. van der Laan executed the FUMA data collection. M.A.C. Depuydt, K.H.M. Prange, L. Slenders, A. Boltjes, I. Bot, B. Slütter, and S.W. van der Laan participated in conceptualization, data interpretation, and provided critical feedback on the article. S.C.A. de Jager and E. Lutgens provided critical feedback on the article. H.M. den Ruijter and C.K. Glass provided funding and critical feedback on the article. T. Örd, E. Aavik, and T. Lönnberg processed the human plaque samples and carried out the experimental work for single-cell ATAC sequencing (scATAC-seq), analyzed the data, and prepared the corresponding figures. M.U. Kaikkonen and S. Yla-Herttuala participated in the conceptualization, funding, and supervision of the scATAC-seq experiments and analysis. M. Mokry, J. Kuiper, M.P.J de Winther, and G. Pasterkamp participated in the conceptualization, funding, and supervision of the single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) experiments and analysis and finalization of the article. All authors provided feedback on the research, analyses, and article.

Supplemental Materials

Expanded Material & Methods

Online Figures I–VIII

Online Table I–IV



*M.A.C.D., K.H.M.P., and L.S. contributed equally to this work.

†M.M., J.K., M.P.J.d.W., and G.P. shared last authorship.

The Data Supplement is available with this article at

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 1452.

Corresponding authors: Johan Kuiper Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Biotherapeutics, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. Email:
Menno P.J. de Winther: Amsterdam University Medical Centers–location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Experimental Vascular Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email:
Michal Mokry: Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands Email:
Gerard Pasterkamp: Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: .


  • 1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2017; 135:e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Turner AW, Wong D, Dreisbach CN, Miller CL. GWAS reveal targets in vessel wall pathways to treat coronary artery disease.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 5:72. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00072CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Winkels H, Ehinger E, Vassallo M, Buscher K, Dinh HQ, Kobiyama K, Hamers AAJ, Cochain C, Vafadarnejad E, Saliba AE, et al. Atlas of the immune cell repertoire in mouse atherosclerosis defined by single-cell RNA-sequencing and mass cytometry.Circ Res. 2018; 122:1675–1688. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Cochain C, Vafadarnejad E, Arampatzi P, Pelisek J, Winkels H, Ley K, Wolf D, Saliba AE, Zernecke A. Single-Cell RNA-Seq reveals the transcriptional landscape and heterogeneity of aortic macrophages in murine atherosclerosis.Circ Res. 2018; 122:1661–1674. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312509LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Kim K, Shim D, Lee JS, Zaitsev K, Williams JW, Kim KW, Jang MY, Seok Jang H, Yun TJ, Lee SH, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals nonfoamy rather than foamy plaque macrophages are proinflammatory in atherosclerotic murine models.Circ Res. 2018; 123:1127–1142. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312804LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Lin J-D, Nishi H, Poles J, Niu X, Mccauley C, Rahman K, Brown EJ, Yeung ST, Vozhilla N, Weinstock A, et al. Single-cell analysis of fate-mapped macrophages reveals heterogeneity, including stem-like properties, during atherosclerosis progression and regression.JCI Insight. 2019; 4:e124574.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Fernandez DM, Rahman AH, Fernandez NF, Chudnovskiy A, Amir ED, Amadori L, Khan NS, Wong CK, Shamailova R, Hill CA, et al. Single-cell immune landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques.Nat Med. 2019; 25:1576–1588. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0590-4CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Aran D, Looney AP, Liu L, Wu E, Fong V, Hsu A, Chak S, Naikawadi RP, Wolters PJ, Abate AR, et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage.Nat Immunol. 2019; 20:163–172. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0276-yCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Müller AM, Hermanns MI, Skrzynski C, Nesslinger M, Müller KM, Kirkpatrick CJ. Expression of the endothelial markers PECAM-1, vWf, and CD34 in vivo and in vitro.Exp Mol Pathol. 2002; 72:221–229. doi: 10.1006/exmp.2002.2424CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Owens GK. Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells.Physiol Rev. 1995; 75:487–517. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.487CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Germain RN. T-cell development and the CD4-CD8 lineage decision.Nat Rev Immunol. 2002; 2:309–322. doi: 10.1038/nri798CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. LeBien TW, Tedder TF. B lymphocytes: how they develop and function.Blood. 2008; 112:1570–1580. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-078071CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Ancuta P, Crowe S, Dalod M, Grau V, Hart DN, Leenen PJ, Liu YJ, MacPherson G, Randolph GJ, et al. Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood.Blood. 2010; 116:e74–e80. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-258558CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Stöger JL, Gijbels MJ, van der Velden S, Manca M, van der Loos CM, Biessen EA, Daemen MJ, Lutgens E, de Winther MP. Distribution of macrophage polarization markers in human atherosclerosis.Atherosclerosis. 2012; 225:461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.013CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE. Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis.Circ Res. 2016; 118:653–667. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306256LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Voehringer D. Protective and pathological roles of mast cells and basophils.Nat Rev Immunol. 2013; 13:362–375. doi: 10.1038/nri3427CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Shankman LS, Gomez D, Cherepanova OA, Salmon M, Alencar GF, Haskins RM, Swiatlowska P, Newman AA, Greene ES, Straub AC, et al. KLF4-dependent phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells has a key role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis.Nat Med. 2015; 21:628–637. doi: 10.1038/nm.3866CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Thiriot A, Perdomo C, Cheng G, Novitzky-Basso I, McArdle S, Kishimoto JK, Barreiro O, Mazo I, Triboulet R, Ley K, et al. Differential DARC/ACKR1 expression distinguishes venular from non-venular endothelial cells in murine tissues.BMC Biol. 2017; 15:45. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0381-7CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Kalucka J, de Rooij LPMH, Goveia J, Rohlenova K, Dumas SJ, Meta E, Conchinha NV, Taverna F, Teuwen LA, Veys K, et al. Single-cell transcriptome atlas of murine endothelial cells.Cell. 2020; 180:764–779.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.015CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Adams GN, Stavrou EX, Fang C, Merkulova A, Alaiti MA, Nakajima K, Morooka T, Merkulov S, Larusch GA, Simon DI, et al. Prolylcarboxypeptidase promotes angiogenesis and vascular repair.Blood. 2013; 122:1522–1531. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-460360CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Elices MJ, Osborn L, Luhowskyj S, Hemler ME, Lobb RR. VCAM-1 on activated endothelium interacts with the leukocyte integrin VLA-4 at a site distinct from the VLA-4.pdf.Cell. 1990; 60:577–584.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Moreno PR, Purushothaman KR, Sirol M, Levy AP, Fuster V. Neovascularization in human atherosclerosis.Circulation. 2006; 113:2245–2252. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578955LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Zhu L, Vranckx R, Khau Van Kien P, Lalande A, Boisset N, Mathieu F, Wegman M, Glancy L, Gasc JM, Brunotte F, et al. Mutations in myosin heavy chain 11 cause a syndrome associating thoracic aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus.Nat Genet. 2006; 38:343–349. doi: 10.1038/ng1721CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Jin S, Hansson EM, Tikka S, Lanner F, Sahlgren C, Farnebo F, Baumann M, Kalimo H, Lendahl U. Notch signaling regulates platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta expression in vascular smooth muscle cells.Circ Res. 2008; 102:1483–1491. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.167965LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Schlosser A, Pilecki B, Hemstra LE, Kejling K, Kristmannsdottir GB, Wulf-johansson H, Moeller JB, Füchtbauer E, Nielsen O, Kirketerp-møller K, et al. MFAP4 promotes vascular smooth muscle migration,.Arter Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016; 36:122–133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Rensen SS, Doevendans PA, van Eys GJ. Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity.Neth Heart J. 2007; 15:100–108. doi: 10.1007/BF03085963CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Luger D, Yang YA, Raviv A, Weinberg D, Banerjee S, Lee MJ, Trepel J, Yang L, Wakefield LM. Expression of the B-cell receptor component CD79a on immature myeloid cells contributes to their tumor promoting effects.PLoS One. 2013; 8:e76115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076115CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Tedder TF, Tuscano J, Sato S, Kehrl JH. CD22, a B lymphocyte-specific adhesion molecule that regulates antigen receptor signaling.Annu Rev Immunol. 1997; 15:481–504. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.481CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Liu C, Richard K, Melvin W, Zhu X, Conrad DH. CD23 can negatively regulate B-cell receptor signaling.Sci Rep. 2016; 6:1–8.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Liuzzo G, Goronzy JJ, Yang H, Kopecky SL, Holmes DR, Frye RL, Weyand CM. Monoclonal T-cell proliferation and plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes.Circulation. 2000; 101:2883–2888. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.25.2883LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Trotta G, Brugaletta S, Pinnelli M, Digianuario G, Rizzello V, Rebuzzi AG, Rumi C, Maseri A, et al. Unusual CD4+CD28null T lymphocytes and recurrence of acute coronary events.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50:1450–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.040CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Mohr A, Malhotra R, Mayer G, Gorochov G, Miyara M. Human FOXP3+ T regulatory cell heterogeneity.Clin Transl Immunol. 2018; 7:1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Malhotra N, Leyva-Castillo JM, Jadhav U, Barreiro O, Kam C, O’Neill NK, Meylan F, Chambon P, Von Andrian UH, Siegel RM, et al. RORα-expressing T regulatory cells restrain allergic skin inflammation.Sci Immunol. 2018; 3:1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Wohlfert EA, Grainger JR, Bouladoux N, Konkel JE, Oldenhove G, Ribeiro CH, Hall JA, Yagi R, Naik S, Bhairavabhotla R, et al. GATA3 controls Foxp3+ regulatory T cell fate during inflammation in mice.J Clin Invest. 2011; 121:4503–4515. doi: 10.1172/JCI57456CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Guo X, Zhang Y, Zheng L, Zheng C, Song J, Zhang Q, Kang B, Liu Z, Jin L, Xing R, et al. Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing.Nat Med. 2018; 24:978–985. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0045-3CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Li H, van der Leun AM, Yofe I, Lubling Y, Gelbard-Solodkin D, van Akkooi ACJ, van den Braber M, Rozeman EA, Haanen JBAG, Blank CU, et al. Dysfunctional CD8 T cells form a proliferative, dynamically regulated compartment within human melanoma.Cell. 2019; 176:775.e18–789.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.043CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion.Nat Rev Immunol. 2015; 15:486–499. doi: 10.1038/nri3862CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38. van Duijn J, van Elsas M, Benne N, Depuydt M, Wezel A, Smeets H, Bot I, Jiskoot W, Kuiper J, Slütter B. CD39 identifies a microenvironment-specific anti-inflammatory CD8+ T-cell population in atherosclerotic lesions.Atherosclerosis. 2019; 285:71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.04.217CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39. Chyu KY, Zhao X, Dimayuga PC, Zhou J, Li X, Yano J, Lio WM, Chan LF, Kirzner J, Trinidad P, et al. CD8+ T cells mediate the athero-protective effect of immunization with an ApoB-100 peptide.PLoS One. 2012; 7:e30780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030780CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Dwyer DF, Barrett NA, Austen KF; Immunological Genome Project Consortium. Expression profiling of constitutive mast cells reveals a unique identity within the immune system.Nat Immunol. 2016; 17:878–887. doi: 10.1038/ni.3445CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41. Kapoor N, Niu J, Saad Y, Kumar S, Sirakova T, Becerra E, Li X, Kolattukudy PE. Transcription factors STAT6 and KLF4 implement macrophage polarization via the dual catalytic powers of MCPIP.J Immunol. 2015; 194:6011–6023. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402797CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42. Westerterp M, Bochem AE, Yvan-Charvet L, Murphy AJ, Wang N, Tall AR. ATP-binding cassette transporters, atherosclerosis, and inflammation.Circ Res. 2014; 114:157–170. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.300738LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Collot-Teixeira S, Martin J, McDermott-Roe C, Poston R, McGregor JL. CD36 and macrophages in atherosclerosis.Cardiovasc Res. 2007; 75:468–477. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.03.010CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44. Ramachandran P, Dobie R, Wilson-Kanamori JR, Dora EF, Henderson BEP, Luu NT, Portman JR, Matchett KP, Brice M, Marwick JA, et al. Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level.Nature. 2019; 575:512–518.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45. Jaitin DA, Adlung L, Thaiss CA, Weiner A, Li B, Descamps H, Lundgren P, Bleriot C, Liu Z, Deczkowska A, et al. Lipid-associated macrophages control metabolic homeostasis in a Trem2-dependent manner.Cell. 2019; 178:686.e14–698.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46. Kuznetsova T, Prange KHM, Glass CK, de Winther MPJ. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of macrophages in atherosclerosis.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019; 17:216–228.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47. Wang Z, Wang DZ, Pipes GC, Olson EN. Myocardin is a master regulator of smooth muscle gene expression.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100:7129–7134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1232341100CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48. Boltjes A, van Wijk F. Human dendritic cell functional specialization in steady-state and inflammation.Front Immunol. 2014; 5:131. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00131CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49. Villlani AC, Satija R, Reynolds G, Sarkizova S, Shekhar K, Fletcher J, Griesbeck M, Butler A, Zheng S, Lazo S, et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors.Science. 2017; 356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50. Efremova M, Vento-Tormo M, Teichmann SA, Vento-Tormo R. CellPhoneDB v2.0: Inferring cell-cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit receptor-ligand complexes.bioRxiv. 2020; 15:1484–1506.Google Scholar
  • 51. Bonecchi R, Graham GJ. Atypical chemokine receptors and their roles in the resolution of the inflammatory response.Front Immunol. 2016; 7:224. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00224CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52. Engelbertsen D, Autio A, Verwilligen RAF, Depuydt MAC, Newton G, Rattik S, Levinsohn E, Saggu G, Jarolim P, Wang H, et al. Increased lymphocyte activation and atherosclerosis in CD47-deficient mice.Sci Rep. 2019; 9:10608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46942-xCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53. Sato N, Beitz JG, Kato J, Yamamoto M, Clark JW, Calabresi P, Raymond A, Frackelton ARPlatelet-derived growth factor indirectly stimulates angiogenesis in vitro.Am J Pathol. 1993; 142:1119–1130.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 54. Corliss BA, Azimi MS, Munson JM, Peirce SM, Murfee WL. Macrophages: an inflammatory link between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.Microcirculation. 2016; 23:95–121. doi: 10.1111/micc.12259CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 55. Lou L, Zhang P, Piao R, Wang Y. Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and its complex regulatory network.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019; 9:270. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00270CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 56. Cauchy P, Maqbool MA, Zacarias-Cabeza J, Vanhille L, Koch F, Fenouil R, Gut M, Gut I, Santana MA, Griffon A, et al. Dynamic recruitment of Ets1 to both nucleosome-occupied and -depleted enhancer regions mediates a transcriptional program switch during early T-cell differentiation.Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:3567–3585. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1475CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 57. Collin M, Bigley V. Human dendritic cell subsets: an update.Immunology. 2018; 154:3–20. doi: 10.1111/imm.12888CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 58. Akdis M, Aab A, Altunbulakli C, Azkur K, Costa RA, Crameri R, Duan S, Eiwegger T, Eljaszewicz A, Ferstl R, et al. Interleukins (from IL-1 to IL-38), interferons, transforming growth factor β, and TNF-α: Receptors, functions, and roles in diseases.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 138:984–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.033CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 59. Hauer AD, Uyttenhove C, de Vos P, Stroobant V, Renauld JC, van Berkel TJ, van Snick J, Kuiper J. Blockade of interleukin-12 function by protein vaccination attenuates atherosclerosis.Circulation. 2005; 112:1054–1062. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.533463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 60. Tian Y, Babor M, Lane J, Schulten V, Patil VS, Seumois G, Rosales SL, Fu Z, Picarda G, Burel J, et al. Unique phenotypes and clonal expansions of human CD4 effector memory T cells re-expressing CD45RA.Nat Commun. 2017; 8:1473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01728-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 61. Mucida D, Husain MM, Muroi S, van Wijk F, Shinnakasu R, Naoe Y, Reis BS, Huang Y, Lambolez F, Docherty M, et al. Transcriptional reprogramming of mature CD4+ helper T cells generates distinct MHC class II-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes.Nat Immunol. 2013; 14:281–289. doi: 10.1038/ni.2523CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 62. Tian Y, Sette A, Weiskopf D. Cytotoxic CD4 T cells: differentiation, function, and application to dengue virus infection.Front Immunol. 2016; 7:531. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00531CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 63. Reis BS, Rogoz A, Costa-Pinto FA, Taniuchi I, Mucida D. Mutual expression of the transcription factors Runx3 and ThPOK regulates intestinal CD4+ T cell immunity.Nat Immunol. 2013; 14:271–280. doi: 10.1038/ni.2518CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 64. Kurachi M, Barnitz RA, Yosef N, Odorizzi PM, DiIorio MA, Lemieux ME, Yates K, Godec J, Klatt MG, Regev A, et al. The transcription factor BATF operates as an essential differentiation checkpoint in early effector CD8+ T cells.Nat Immunol. 2014; 15:373–383. doi: 10.1038/ni.2834CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 65. Hoeksema MA, Stöger JL, de Winther MP. Molecular pathways regulating macrophage polarization: implications for atherosclerosis.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012; 14:254–263. doi: 10.1007/s11883-012-0240-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 66. Goossens P, Gijbels MJ, Zernecke A, Eijgelaar W, Vergouwe MN, van der Made I, Vanderlocht J, Beckers L, Buurman WA, Daemen MJ, et al. Myeloid type I interferon signaling promotes atherosclerosis by stimulating macrophage recruitment to lesions.Cell Metab. 2010; 12:142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.06.008CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 67. Minematsu H, Shin MJ, Celil Aydemir AB, Kim KO, Nizami SA, Chung GJ, Lee FY. Nuclear presence of nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) c3 and c4 is required for Toll-like receptor-activated innate inflammatory response of monocytes/macrophages.Cell Signal. 2011; 23:1785–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.06.013CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 68. Fric J, Zelante T, Wong AY, Mertes A, Yu HB, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. NFAT control of innate immunity.Blood. 2012; 120:1380–1389. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-404475CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 69. Erdmann J, Kessler T, Munoz Venegas L, Schunkert H. A decade of genome-wide association studies for coronary artery disease: the challenges ahead.Cardiovasc Res. 2018; 114:1241–1257. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy084CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 70. Nelson CP, Goel A, Butterworth AS, Kanoni S, Webb TR, Marouli E, Zeng L, Ntalla I, Lai FY, Hopewell JC, et al; EPIC-CVD Consortium; CARDIoGRAMplusC4D; UK Biobank CardioMetabolic Consortium CHD working group. Association analyses based on false discovery rate implicate new loci for coronary artery disease.Nat Genet. 2017; 49:1385–1391. doi: 10.1038/ng.3913CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 71. Van Dijk RA, Duinisveld AJF, Schaapherder AF, Mulder-Stapel A, Hamming JF, Kuiper J, De Boer OJ, Van Der Wal AC, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, et al. A change in inflammatory footprint precedes plaque instability: a systematic evaluation of cellular aspects of the adaptive immune response in human atherosclerosis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4:e001403.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 72. van Dijk RA, Virmani R, von der Thüsen JH, Schaapherder AF, Lindeman JH. The natural history of aortic atherosclerosis: a systematic histopathological evaluation of the peri-renal region.Atherosclerosis. 2010; 210:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.11.016CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 73. Téo FH, de Oliveira RT, Mamoni RL, Ferreira MC, Nadruz W, Coelho OR, Fernandes Jde L, Blotta MH. Characterization of CD4+CD28null T cells in patients with coronary artery disease and individuals with risk factors for atherosclerosis.Cell Immunol. 2013; 281:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.01.007CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 74. Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation.Nat Rev Immunol. 2008; 8:958–969. doi: 10.1038/nri2448CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 75. Peeters W, Hellings WE, de Kleijn DP, de Vries JP, Moll FL, Vink A, Pasterkamp G. Carotid atherosclerotic plaques stabilize after stroke: insights into the natural process of atherosclerotic plaque stabilization.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29:128–133. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.173658LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 76. Scholtes VP, Peeters W, van Lammeren GW, Howard DP, de Vries JP, de Borst GJ, Redgrave JN, Kemperman H, Schalkwijk CG, den Ruijter HM, et al. Type 2 diabetes is not associated with an altered plaque phenotype among patients undergoing carotid revascularization. A histological analysis of 1455 carotid plaques.Atherosclerosis. 2014; 235:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.941CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 77. Van Vré EA, Van Brussel I, Bosmans JM, Vrints CJ, Bult H. Dendritic cells in human atherosclerosis: from circulation to atherosclerotic plaques.Mediators Inflamm. 2011; 2011:941396. doi: 10.1155/2011/941396CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 78. Howell KW, Meng X, Fullerton DA, Jin C, Reece TB, Cleveland JCToll-like receptor 4 mediates oxidized LDL-induced macrophage differentiation to foam cells.J Surg Res. 2011; 171:e27–e31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.033CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 79. Karasawa T, Takahashi M. Role of NLRP3 inflammasomes in atherosclerosis.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017; 24:443–451. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17001CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 80. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Nicolau J, Koenig W, Anker SD, et al; CANTOS Trial Group. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease.N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:1119–1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 81. Buono C, Come CE, Stavrakis G, Maguire GF, Connelly PW, Lichtman AH. Influence of interferon-gamma on the extent and phenotype of diet-induced atherosclerosis in the LDLR-deficient mouse.Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23:454–460. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000059419.11002.6ELinkGoogle Scholar
  • 82. Gupta S, Pablo AM, Jiang Xc, Wang N, Tall AR, Schindler C. IFN-gamma potentiates atherosclerosis in ApoE knock-out mice.J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:2752–2761. doi: 10.1172/JCI119465CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 83. Jessup W, Gelissen IC, Gaus K, Kritharides L. Roles of ATP binding cassette transporters A1 and G1, scavenger receptor BI and membrane lipid domains in cholesterol export from macrophages.Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006; 17:247–257. doi: 10.1097/01.mol.0000226116.35555.ebCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 84. Tangirala RK, Bischoff ED, Joseph SB, Wagner BL, Walczak R, Laffitte BA, Daige CL, Thomas D, Heyman RA, Mangelsdorf DJ, et al. Identification of macrophage liver X receptors as inhibitors of atherosclerosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99:11896–11901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182199799CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 85. Choi SH, Harkewicz R, Lee JH, Boullier A, Almazan F, Li AC, Witztum JL, Bae YS, Miller YI. Lipoprotein accumulation in macrophages via toll-like receptor-4-dependent fluid phase uptake.Circ Res. 2009; 104:1355–1363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192880LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 86. Xu XH, Shah PK, Faure E, Equils O, Thomas L, Fishbein MC, Luthringer D, Xu XP, Rajavashisth TB, Yano J, et al. Toll-like receptor-4 is expressed by macrophages in murine and human lipid-rich atherosclerotic plaques and upregulated by oxidized LDL.Circulation. 2001; 104:3103–3108. doi: 10.1161/hc5001.100631LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 87. Stewart CR, Stuart LM, Wilkinson K, van Gils JM, Deng J, Halle A, Rayner KJ, Boyer L, Zhong R, Frazier WA, et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer.Nat Immunol. 2010; 11:155–161. doi: 10.1038/ni.1836CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 88. Chou MY, Hartvigsen K, Hansen LF, Fogelstrand L, Shaw PX, Boullier A, Binder CJ, Witztum JL. Oxidation-specific epitopes are important targets of innate immunity.J Intern Med. 2008; 263:479–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01968.xCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 89. Michelsen KS, Wong MH, Shah PK, Zhang W, Yano J, Doherty TM, Akira S, Rajavashisth TB, Arditi M. Lack of Toll-like receptor 4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque phenotype in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:10679–10684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403249101CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 90. Monaco C, Gregan SM, Navin TJ, Foxwell BM, Davies AH, Feldmann M. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates inflammation and matrix degradation in human atherosclerosis.Circulation. 2009; 120:2462–2469. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.851881LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 91. Duewell P, Kono H, Rayner KJ, Sirois CM, Vladimer G, Bauernfeind FG, Abela GS, Franchi L, Nuñez G, Schnurr M, et al. NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals.Nature. 2010; 464:1357–1361. doi: 10.1038/nature08938CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 92. Spann NJ, Garmire LX, McDonald JG, Myers DS, Milne SB, Shibata N, Reichart D, Fox JN, Shaked I, Heudobler D, et al. Regulated accumulation of desmosterol integrates macrophage lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses.Cell. 2012; 151:138–152. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.054CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 93. Baardman J, Verberk SGS, Prange KHM, van Weeghel M, van der Velden S, Ryan DG, Wüst RCI, Neele AE, Speijer D, Denis SW, et al. A defective pentose phosphate pathway reduces inflammatory macrophage responses during hypercholesterolemia.Cell Rep. 2018; 25:2044–2052.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.092CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 94. Neele AE, Prange KH, Hoeksema MA, van der Velden S, Lucas T, Dimmeler S, Lutgens E, Van den Bossche J, de Winther MP. Macrophage Kdm6b controls the pro-fibrotic transcriptome signature of foam cells.Epigenomics. 2017; 9:383–391. doi: 10.2217/epi-2016-0152CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 95. Wesseling M, Sakkers TR, de Jager SCA, Pasterkamp G, Goumans MJ. The morphological and molecular mechanisms of epithelial/endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and its involvement in atherosclerosis.Vascul Pharmacol. 2018; 106:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2018.02.006CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 96. Cho JG, Lee A, Chang W, Lee MS, Kim J. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition represents a key link in the interaction between inflammation and endothelial dysfunction.Front Immunol. 2018; 9:294. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00294CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 97. Chen PY, Qin L, Baeyens N, Li G, Afolabi T, Budatha M, Tellides G, Schwartz MA, Simons M. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives atherosclerosis progression.J Clin Invest. 2015; 125:4514–4528. doi: 10.1172/JCI82719CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 98. Boyle EA, Li YI, Pritchard JK. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic.Cell. 2017; 169:1177–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 99. Verhoeven BA, Velema E, Schoneveld AH, de Vries JP, de Bruin P, Seldenrijk CA, de Kleijn DP, Busser E, van der Graaf Y, Moll F, et al. Athero-express: differential atherosclerotic plaque expression of mRNA and protein in relation to cardiovascular events and patient characteristics. Rationale and design.Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19:1127–1133. doi: 10.1007/s10564-004-2304-6CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 100. Hellings WE, Moll FL, de Vries JP, de Bruin P, de Kleijn DP, Pasterkamp G. Histological characterization of restenotic carotid plaques in relation to recurrence interval and clinical presentation: a cohort study.Stroke. 2008; 39:1029–1032. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496703LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 101. Hashimshony T, Senderovich N, Avital G, Klochendler A, de Leeuw Y, Anavy L, Gennert D, Li S, Livak KJ, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq.Genome Biol. 2016; 17:77. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0938-8CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 102. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 103. Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, Groen N, Dielen T, Jansen E, van Gurp L, Engelse MA, Carlotti F, de Koning EJ, et al. A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas.Cell Syst. 2016; 3:385–394.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 104. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment For Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL 2020.Google Scholar
  • 105. Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species.Nat Biotechnol. 2018; 36:411–420. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4096CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 106. Martens JH, Stunnenberg HG. Blueprint: mapping human blood cell epigenomes.Haematologica. 2013; 98:1487–1489. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.094243CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 107. Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E, Mauck WM, Hao Y, Stoeckius M, Smibert P, Satija R. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data.Cell. 2019; 177:1888.e21–1902.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 108. Schep AN, Wu B, Buenrostro JD, Greenleaf WJ. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data.Nat Methods. 2017; 14:975–978. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4401CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 109. Khan A, Fornes O, Stigliani A, Gheorghe M, Castro-Mondragon JA, van der Lee R, Bessy A, Chèneby J, Kulkarni SR, Tan G, et al. JASPAR 2018: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles and its web framework.Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:D260–D266. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1126CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 110. Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA.Nat Commun. 2017; 8:1826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 111. Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM, Durbin RM, Bentley DR, Chakravarti A, Clark AG, Donnelly P, Eichler EE, Flicek P, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation.Nature. 2015; 526:68–74.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 112. de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data.PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11:e1004219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

Novelty and Significance

What Is Known?

  • Atherosclerotic lesions show a complex cellular composition that has mainly been studied using selected marker molecules.

  • The benefit of using single-cell RNA sequencing as unbiased method has been shown for immune cells in both murine and human atherosclerosis.

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

  • Single-cell RNA sequencing of a broad cohort of human carotid plaques now provides a detailed cellular atlas of the various cell types and their phenotypes, including different clusters of endothelial and smooth muscle cells.

  • Chromatin accessibility of macrophages and T cells is mapped at a single-cell level and identifies relevant transcription factor binding sites.

  • Mapping of cardiovascular susceptibility genes identified by genome-wide association studies to cellular subsets identifies potential cell-specific targets.

It is important to determine the exact cell (sub)types and their interactions at play in atherosclerosis to devise novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we describe the total cellular composition of atherosclerotic plaques taken from carotid arteries of a broad cohort of patients. Our data suggest that the main immune cell subset consists of T cells, which can be subdivided by activation status. Macrophages are found in distinct populations with diverse activation patterns, inflammatory status, and foam cell characteristics. We shed light on plaque endothelial and smooth muscle cell gene expression and show cell clusters with gene expression patterns pointing towards characteristics of endothelial to mesenchymal transition. To further investigate the dynamic intraplaque niche, we assessed ligand-receptor interactions driving our cell communities and investigated potential transcription factor activity underlying myeloid and T-cell populations in the plaque by studying chromatin accessibility at the single-cell level. Finally, we identified cell types enriched for cardiovascular susceptibility genes by integrating available genome-wide association studies data. Together, our data provide an in-depth map of the human atherosclerotic plaque and give valuable insights into cell types, pathways, and genes that are relevant for future research aiming at the development of novel therapeutic strategies.


eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.