Skip to main content
This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
VIEW EDITORIAL:ACEing COVID-19

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Rationale:

Use of ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) is a major concern for clinicians treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with hypertension.

Objective:

To determine the association between in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertension and hospitalized due to COVID-19.

Methods and Results:

This retrospective, multi-center study included 1128 adult patients with hypertension diagnosed with COVID-19, including 188 taking ACEI/ARB (ACEI/ARB group; median age 64 [interquartile range, 55–68] years; 53.2% men) and 940 without using ACEI/ARB (non-ACEI/ARB group; median age 64 [interquartile range 57–69]; 53.5% men), who were admitted to 9 hospitals in Hubei Province, China from December 31, 2019 to February 20, 2020. In mixed-effect Cox model treating site as a random effect, after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and in-hospital medications, the detected risk for all-cause mortality was lower in the ACEI/ARB group versus the non-ACEI/ARB group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.19–0.92]; P=0.03). In a propensity score-matched analysis followed by adjusting imbalanced variables in mixed-effect Cox model, the results consistently demonstrated lower risk of COVID-19 mortality in patients who received ACEI/ARB versus those who did not receive ACEI/ARB (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15–0.89]; P=0.03). Further subgroup propensity score-matched analysis indicated that, compared with use of other antihypertensive drugs, ACEI/ARB was also associated with decreased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12–0.70]; P=0.01) in patients with COVID-19 and coexisting hypertension.

Conclusions:

Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and coexisting hypertension, inpatient use of ACEI/ARB was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with ACEI/ARB nonusers. While study interpretation needs to consider the potential for residual confounders, it is unlikely that in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB was associated with an increased mortality risk.

Introduction

In This Issue, see p 1667
Editorial, see p 1682
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic is caused by an infection with a novel coronavirus, officially named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2).1 Among patients with COVID-19 admitted to a hospital, emerging data suggest that hypertension may be associated with an increased risk of mortality due to COVID-19.2–4
ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) are part of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibiting agents and considered as one of the first-line medications for the management of a large proportion of patients with hypertension.5,6 However, continued use of ACEI/ARB has become controversial in the setting of COVID-19. The reason for this controversy stems from the fact that ACEIs and ARBs use may increase the expression of ACE2 receptor in animal-based studies,7,8 which is the known cellular receptor and a necessary entry point for SARS-COV-2 infection.9 Conversely, it has been indicated that ACE2 expression is downregulated following SARS infection, resulting in excessive activation of RAS and exacerbated pneumonia progression.10 Therefore, administration of ACEI/ARB may, in turn, be beneficial by blocking ACE2 downregulation-induced hyperactivation of RAS and thereby preventing acute lung injury. However, due to lack of sufficient clinical data supporting either the beneficial or harmful effects of ACEI/ARB use in patients with COVID-19, the optimal strategy for the management of hypertension in COVID-19 is uncertain and remains to be elucidated. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the association between in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB and all-cause mortality of COVID-19 among patients with hypertension.

Methods

Materials and data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Study Design and Participants

This retrospective, multi-center study included 1128 patients with hypertension and COVID-19 admitted to 9 hospitals in Hubei, China, including Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan First Hospital, Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan Seventh Hospital, Wuhan Ninth Hospital, Thunder Mountain Hospital, Huanggang Central Hospital, and the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture. The study protocols were approved by central ethics committee, and all collaborating hospitals either approved study protocol by local ethics committees or accepted the central ethics approval. Patient informed consent was waived by each ethics committee. Patients were admitted between December 31, 2019 and February 20, 2020. The final date of follow-up was March 7, 2020.
COVID-19 was diagnosed by meeting one or both criteria of chest computerized tomography manifestations and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction according to the New Coronavirus Pneumonia Prevention and Control Program (fifth edition) published by the National Health Commission of China and World Health Organization interim guidance (Table I in the Data Supplement).11,12 We used the following inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine the study cohort. The inclusion criteria included patients with COVID-19, aged from 18 to 74 years, who were admitted to the above-mentioned hospitals in Hubei, China from December 31, 2019 to February 20, 2020. The exclusion criteria included incomplete medical records (eg, transfer to any other hospital), pregnancy, acute lethal organ injury (eg, acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary embolism, or acute stroke), decompensated or end stage of chronic organ dysfunction (eg, decompensated cirrhosis, decompensated chronic renal insufficiency, or severe congestive heart failure), AIDS, leukemia or malignancy. Patients with hypertension were classified based upon clearly documented medical history with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg.5

Data Collection

Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, radiological report data, history of comorbidities, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization, and clinical outcomes. The patient demographic information (age and gender), clinical characteristics (fever, cough, fatigue, dyspnea, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure), and durations from symptom onset to admission were collected from electronic medical system. The radiological report data (chest computed tomography-diagnosed unilateral and bilateral lesions) were obtained from picture achieving and communication system. Laboratory data (blood cell count, CRP [C-reactive protein], procalcitonin, D-dimer, organ function markers, K+, LDL-c [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol], SpO2, and blood glucose) were collected from laboratory information system. Comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, chronic renal diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, chronic liver disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were extracted from medical history. The in-hospital medications and interventions were collected from doctor advices. Personal health identifying information (eg, name and ID) was anonymized, and each participant was given a study ID using an electronic coding system before data extraction to preserve patient privacy. Data were carefully reviewed and confirmed by experienced physicians and were double-checked to guarantee the accuracy of the data extraction procedures.

Definition

The onset of COVID-19 was defined as the time point when the symptoms were first noticed. Patients with hypertension who received ACEI/ARB during hospitalization were classified as ACEI/ARB group. Patients with hypertension who did not receive ACEI/ARB during hospitalization were classified as non-ACEI/ARB group. In the subgroup propensity score-matched cohort analysis among patients taking antihypertensive medications, participants taking ACEI/ARB and other antihypertensive drugs (non-ACEI/ARB) during in-hospital stay were included. Patients discontinued treatment of hypertension due to inability to take medications (eg, hypotension, mechanical ventilation without nasal feeding and unable to orally taking medicines, or increase of creatinine level) during hospitalization were still included from the cohort. The primary end point was defined as 28-day all-cause death. Acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock were defined according to the World Health Organization interim guideline Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection is suspected13 (Table I in the Data Supplement). Acute kidney injury was defined as an elevation in serum creatinine level equal or above 26.5 μmmol/L within 48 hours.14 Cardiac injury was defined as the serum level of cTNI (cardiac troponin I), cTNT (cardiac troponin T), or hs-cTNI (high sensitivity cardiac troponin I) above the upper limit of normal. Disseminated intravascular coagulation was defined according to the criteria defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis.15 The increase in blood cell count and biochemical indexes were defined as over their upper limit of normal according to the criteria by the laboratory standards in each hospital (upper limits of normal for CRP, procalcitonin, creatinine, D-dimer, and platelets were shown in Table II in the Data Supplement).

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Propensity score-matched cohorts were created based on variables which were expected to be potential confounders associated with exposure to ACEI/ARB, including age, gender, fever, cough, dyspnea, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and chronic renal disease), computerized tomography-diagnosed bilateral lung lesions, and incidence of increased CRP and creatinine. We adjusted for imbalanced variables (D-dimer, procalcitonin, and unilateral lesion) and in-hospital medications (antiviral drug and lipid-lowering drug) between ACEI/ARB versus non-ACEI/ARB groups in following mixed-effect Cox model. We used nonparametric missing value imputation, based on the missForest procedure in the R, to account for missing data on the laboratory variable of increased creatinine, CRP levels, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and unilateral lesion.16 A random forest model using the rest of the variables in the data set was performed to predict the missing values for these variables. The internally cross-validated errors were also estimated. ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB users were paired according to the propensity scores using exact matching with a caliper size of 0.05. The balance of covariates was evaluated by estimating SDs before and after matching, and small absolute value <0.1 was considered successful balancing between the 2 groups. For cohort analysis in all patients with hypertension, and in those treated with antihypertensive therapies, ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB ratios were paired at 1:2 and 1:1, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as median and interquartile range, and categorical variables were expressed as number and percentage (%). Statistical differences between 2 groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, while categorical variables were compared using Fisher exact test or χ2 test. The risk of composite end points and corresponding hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model comparing ACEI/ARB group versus non-ACEI/ARB group. Multi-variable adjusted including age, gender, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic renal disease), and in-hospital medications (antiviral drug and lipid-lowering drug) were performed. We modeled site as a random effect in the mixed-effect Cox model. The proportional hazard assumptions were verified using correlation testing based on Schoenfeld residuals. Incidence rate differences (IRDs) were calculated to provide incidence difference on absolute change. The cumulative rates of death were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 2-side α <0.05 was considered statistically different. Because of the potential for type 1 error due to multiple comparisons, findings for analyses of secondary end points should be interpreted as exploratory. Data were analyzed in R-3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS Statistics (version 23.0, IBM, Armonk, NY).

Sensitivity Analysis

E-value analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the association between ACEI/ARB use and all-cause mortality in the mixed-effect Cox model to address unmeasured confounding using the methodology of VanderWeele and Ding.17–19 The E-value is an alternative approach to sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding in our studies that avoids making assumptions that, in turn, require subjective assignment of inputs for some formulas. If the strength of unmeasured confounding is weaker than indicated by the E-value, then the main study result could not be overturned to one of the unmeasured confounder. E-values can, therefore, help to assess the robustness of the main study result by considering whether unmeasured confounding of this magnitude is plausible. We performed 2 sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of propensity score-matched cohort analyses, among all patients with hypertension, using pairs of 1:2. In the first sensitivity analysis, comorbid diabetes mellitus was not included in matching, while the second sensitivity analysis was conducted adding cerebrovascular disease as a matching variable. We conducted a subset sensitivity analysis restricted to patients who were taking an antihypertensive medication, applying matching variables as above with the pairing ratio at 1:1.

Results

Participants

This study cohort included 3611 patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to these 9 hospitals in Hubei, China. After excluding 181 participants following our exclusion criteria, 3430 participants comprising 1128 hypertensive and 2302 normotensive cases were included in subsequent analysis (Figure 1; Table III in the Data Supplement). Among the 1128 participants with hypertension and COVID-19, 188 were classified as ACEI/ARB group (median age 64 [interquartile range, 55–68] years; 53.2% men) and the remaining 940 were classified as non-ACEI/ARB group (median age 64 [interquartile range, 57–69]; 53.5% men). The characteristics of the ACEI/ARB group versus the non-ACEI/ARB group on admission were provided in Table 1. Compared with the ACEI/ARB group, the non-ACEI/ARB group had higher prevalence of fever, dyspnea, and bilateral lung lesion at presentation. The dynamic changes in blood pressure during a 28-day follow-up period after presentation were similar between the ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB groups (Figure I in the Data Supplement). In terms of in-hospital treatment, the ACEI/ARB group had a higher percentage of patients receiving antiviral (88.8% versus 81.7%; P=0.02) and lipid-lowering therapies (22.9% versus 10.0%; P=1.51×10−6) than patients in the non-ACEI/ARB group (Table 2).
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients With Hypertension in ACEI/ARB and Non-ACEI/ARB Groups Before and After Propensity Score Matching
ParametersUnmatchedMatched (1:2)
ACEI/ARB* (n=188)Non-ACEI/ARB n=940)SDACEI/ARB* (n=174)Non-ACEI/ARB (n=348)SD
Clinical characteristics on admission
 Age, median (IQR)64 (55–68)64 (57–69)−0.03564 (56–68)64 (56–69)−0.046
 Male, gender, n (%)100 (53.2)503 (53.5)−0.00694 (54.0)197 (56.6)−0.052
 Female, gender, n (%)88 (46.8)437 (46.5)0.00680 (46.0)151 (43.4)0.052
 Heart rate, median (IQR)82.0 (76.0–95.3)84.0 (78.0–96.0)−0.06282 (76–94)82 (77–94)−0.004
 Respiratory rate, median (IQR)20.0 (19.0–21.0)20.0 (19.0–22.0)−0.04920 (19–21)20 (18–21)0.013
 SBP, median (IQR)132.5 (123.0–145.8)132.0 (120.0–144.0)0.064134 (124–148)132 (121–145)0.027
 DBP, median (IQR)80.0 (72.0–87.8)80.0 (72.0–88.0)−0.02080 (74–88)80 (73–87)0.072
 Symptom onset to admission, median (IQR), d10.0 (7.0–15.0)10.0 (7.0–15.0)−0.05510 (7–15)10 (7–15)−0.111
 Fever, n (%)126 (67.0)700 (74.5)−0.164120 (69.0)235 (67.5)0.031
 Cough, n (%)122 (64.9)653 (69.5)−0.098111 (63.8)223 (64.1)−0.006
 Fatigue, n (%)65 (34.6)363 (38.6)−0.08460 (34.5)131 (37.6)−0.066
 Dyspnea, n (%)38 (20.2)260 (27.7)−0.17534 (19.5)66 (19.0)0.015
Comorbidities on admission
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)44 (23.4)196 (20.9)−0.06240 (23.0)86 (24.7)−0.040
 Coronary heart disease, n (%)29 (15.4)102 (10.9)0.13624 (13.8)46 (13.2)0.017
 Chronic renal diseases, n (%)7 (3.7)28 (3.0)0.0417 (4.0)11 (3.2)0.046
 Cerebrovascular diseases, n (%)5 (2.7)36 (3.8)−0.0664 (2.3)8 (2.3)0.000
 Chronic liver disease, n (%)4 (2.1)17 (1.8)0.0234 (2.3)5 (1.4)0.064
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, n (%)1 (0.5)5 (0.5)0.0001 (0.6)1 (0.3)0.044
Chest CT on admission
 Unilateral lesion, n/N(%)16/173 (9.3)42/895 (4.7)0.18013/159 (8.2)18/329 (5.5)0.107
 Bilateral lesions, n/N (%)146/173 (84.4)795/895 (88.8)−0.130137/159 (86.2)284/329 (86.3)−0.005
Laboratory examination on admission
 Leukocyte count >9.5×109/L, n/N (%)22/183 (12.0)101/883 (11.4)0.01820/170 (11.8)32/325 (9.9)0.062
 Neutrophil count >6.3×109/L, n/N (%)32/183 (17.5)179/882 (20.3)−0.07228/170 (16.5)64/324 (19.8)−0.085
 Lymphocyte count <1.1×109/L, n/N (%)82/183 (44.8)426/883 (48.2)−0.06977/170 (45.3)157/325 (48.3)−0.060
C-reactive protein increase >ULN,§ n/N (%)78/133 (58.7)443/641 (69.1)−0.21974/124 (59.7)136/221 (61.5)−0.038
Procalcitonin level increase >ULN,§ n/N (%)40/144 (27.8)237/727 (32.6)−0.10538/134 (28.4)83/266 (31.2)−0.062
ALT increase >40 U/L, n/N (%)33/179 (18.4)170/877 (19.4)−0.02430/166 (18.1)52/323 (16.1)0.052
AST increase >40 U/L, n/N (%)40/179 (22.4)247/877 (28.2)−0.13437/166 (22.3)79/323 (24.5)−0.051
Creatinine>ULN,§ n/N (%)14/166 (8.4)92/845 (10.9)−0.08311/153 (7.2)25/308 (8.1)−0.035
D-dimer>ULN,§ n/N (%)67/149 (45.0)392/743 (52.8)−0.15663/137 (46.0)140/273 (51.3)−0.106
K+ <3.5 mmol/L, n/N (%)51/179 (28.5)233/873 (26.7)0.04047/166 (28.3)88/323 (27.2)0.024
Platelets<100×109/L n/N (%)22/183 (12.0)106/883 (12.0)0.00021/170 (12.35)44/325 (13.54)−0.073
LDL-c, mmol/L, median (IQR)2.2 (1.8–2.8) [n=151]2.3 (1.8–2.8) [n=721]−0.0102.2 (1.8–2.8) [n=140]2.2 (1.8–2.7) [n=257]0.042
SpO2, <95%, n/N (%)30/138 (21.7)146/692 (21.1)0.01628/125 (22.4)53/254 (20.9)0.037
Blood glucose, median (IQR), mmol/L6.0 (5.1–8.3) [n=163]6.2 (5.2–8.4) [n=803]−0.0116 (5.1–8.3) [n=151]6.2 (5.3–8.7) [n=298]−0.047
ACEI indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ALT, alanine transaminase; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; AST, aspartate transaminase; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CT, chest computerized tomography; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; IQR, interquartile range; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SpO2, oxyhemoglobin saturation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; and ULN, upper limit of normal.
*
Patients with hypertension who taking ACEI or ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the ACEI/ARB cohort. Patients discontinued treatment of hypertension due to inability to take medications or hypotension were not excluded from the cohort.
Patients with hypertension who never taking ACEI and ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the non-ACEI/ARB cohort.
SD be used to compare the mean of baseline covariate between ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB group.
§
ULN was defined according to criteria in each hospital and normal ranges of tests in each hospital were provided in Table II in the Data Supplement.
Table 2. In-Hospital Management of ACEI/ARB and Non-ACEI/ARB Groups
TreatmentACEI/ARB* (n=188)Non-ACEI/ARB (n=940)Absolute Difference (95% CI), %P Value
Traditional Chinese medicine, n (%)171 (91.0)807 (85.9)5.1 (−0.2 to 10.4)0.08
Antiviral drug, n (%)167 (88.8)768 (81.7)7.1 (1.2 to 13.0)0.02
Antibiotics drug, n (%)144 (76.6)718 (76.4)0.2 (−6.4 to 6.9)0.99
Nasal cannula oxygen inhalation,§ n (%)142 (75.5)745 (79.3)−3.7 (−10.1 to 2.7)0.30
Systemic corticosteroids, n (%)66 (35.1)380 (40.4)−6.2 (−13.9 to 1.5)0.20
Antidiabetic drug, n (%)55 (29.3)226 (24.0)5.2 (−1.6 to 12.0)0.16
Lipid-lowering drug, n (%)43 (22.9)94 (10.0)12.8 (7.8 to 18.0)1.51×10−6
Immunoglobin, n (%)51 (27.1)279 (29.7)21.2 (16.7 to 25.6)0.54
Vasoactive drug, n (%)18 (9.6)106 (11.3)−1.7 (−6.6 to 3.2)0.58
Noninvasive ventilation, n (%)15 (8.0)20 (11.4)5.9 (3.1 to 8.6)0.21
Invasive ventilation, n (%)9 (5.0)51 (5.4)3.5 (1.4 to 5.6)0.86
Antifungal medications, n (%)7 (3.7)40 (4.3)−0.5 (−3.7 to 2.6)0.89
Renal replacement therapy, n(%)1 (0.5)14 (1.5)0.1 (−0.9 to 1.2)0.49
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, n (%)0 (0.0)4 (0.4)−0.4 (−1.4 to 0.5)1.00
Diuretic, n (%)58 (30.9)120 (12.8)18.1 (12.4 to 23.8)1.06×10−9
CCB, n (%)103 (54.8)489 (52.0)2.8 (−5.1 to 10.6)0.54
β-blocker, n (%)53 (28.2)168 (17.9)10.3 (4.1 to 16.5)0.002
α-blocker, n (%)4 (2.1)21 (2.2)−0.1 (−2.4 to 2.2)1.00
ACEI, n (%)31 (16.5)0 (0.0)16.5 (13.9 to 19.1)3.34×10−35
ARB, n (%)157 (83.5)0 (0.0)83.5 (78.1 to 88.9)8.16×10−199
ACEI indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; and CCB, calcium channel blocker.
*
Patients with hypertension who taking ACEI or ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the ACEI/ARB cohort. Nine patients in ACEI/ARB group were taken off ACEI/ARB due to hypotension (2 cases), mechanical ventilation without nasal feeding and unable to orally taking medicines (1 case), and increased creatinine level (>1.5-fold of ULN; 6 cases). These patients were still included in ACEI/ARB group. Patients placed on ACEI/ARB on admission were included in the ACEI/ARB group.
Patients with hypertension who never taking ACEI or ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the non-ACEI/ARB cohort.
The P value was calculated by Fisher exact test or χ2 test.
§
Nasal cannula oxygen inhalation was taken in isolation.
Noninvasive ventilation, invasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are at mutually exclusive.
Figure 1. The flowchart showing the strategy of participant enrollment. a, 1128 participants with a history of hypertension enrolled in the hypertension cohort. b, 2302 participants without a history of hypertension enrolled in the nonhypertension cohort. c, 188 patients with hypertension who taking ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) or ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker) during hospitalization were enrolled in the ACEI/ARB cohort. Patients discontinued treatment of hypertension due to inability to take medications or hypotension were not excluded from the cohort. d, 940 patients with hypertension who never taking ACEI and ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the non-ACEI/ARB cohort. e, Propensity score-matched age, gender, cough, dyspnea, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and chronic renal disease), chest computerized tomography (CT)-diagnosed lung lesions, and incidence of increased CRP (C-reactive protein) and creatine. Hospital site as a random effect in the mixed-effect Cox model. f, 557 patients with antihypertension drug who never taking ACEI and ARB during hospitalization were enrolled in the secondary non-ACEI/ARB cohort. SARS-COV-2 indicates severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Primary Outcomes

During a 28-day follow-up duration, 99 deaths died out of the 1128 patients with hypertension and COVID-19. The risk of 28-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in ACEI/ARB group versus non-ACEI/ARB group (IRD, –0.24 [95%CI, –0.43 to –0.05]). In the mixed-effect Cox model using site as a random effect, after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and in-hospital medications (antiviral and lipid-lowering drugs), use of ACEI/ARB was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.92; P=0.03) versus use of non-ACEI/ARB (Figure 2A and Table 3). The E value for the point estimate of primary end point was 4.22 with upper limit of CI at 1.41. In our study, the adjusted HR for association of known variables for all-cause mortality due to COVID-19 were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04–1.11; P=3.30×10−6) for age, 2.23 (95% CI, 1.45−3.43; P=2.78×10−4) for gender, 1.47 (95% CI, 0.86–2.52; P=0.16) for coronary heart disease, and 1.35 (95% CI, 0.58–3.16; P=0.49) for cerebrovascular disease.
Table 3. Hazard Ratios and Incidence Rate Ratios for Outcomes in ACEI/ARB Group vs Non-ACEI/ARB Group Under Mixed-Effect Cox Model and Propensity Score-Matching Model
ACEI/ARB vs Non-ACEI/ARBUnmatchedMatched (1:2)*
 CrudeMixed-Effect ModelMixed-Effect Model
IRD (100 Person-Day; 95% CI)HR (95% CI)P ValueHR (95% CI)P Value§IRD (100 Person-Day; 95% CI)HR (95% CI)P Value§
All-cause mortality−0.24 (−0.43 to −0.05)0.37 (0.17 to 0.79)0.010.42 (0.19 to 0.92)0.03−0.27 (−0.48 to −0.07)0.37 (0.15 to 0.89)0.03
Septic shock−0.19 (−0.36 to −0.01)0.38 (0.17 to 0.87)0.020.36 (0.16 to 0.84)0.02−0.20 (−0.39 to −0.01)0.32 (0.13 to 0.80)0.01
ARDS−0.23(−0.52 to 0.07)0.70 (0.47 to 1.02)0.060.69 (0.47 to 1.02)0.06−0.32 (−0.65 to 0.01)0.65 (0.41 to 1.04)0.07
DIC−0.09 (−0.19 to 0.00)0.04 (0.0 to 4.50)0.18−0.10 (−0.19 to 0.00)
Acute kidney injury0.05 (−0.10 to 0.20)1.17 (0.60 to 2.25)0.651.03(0.51 to 2.07)0.94−0.04 (−0.23 to 0.16)0.78 (0.37 to 1.65)0.52
Acute heart injury−0.10 (−0.29 to 0.08)0.91 (0.57 to 1.45)0.700.89 (0.55 to 1.44)0.640.00 (−0.27 to 0.27)0.76 (0.44 to 1.32)0.33
ACE indicates angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; HR, hazard ratio; and IRD, incidence rate differences, an absolute difference in the incidence between 2 groups.
*
In the mixed-effect Cox model after propensity score matching, age, gender, cough, dyspnea, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and chronic renal disease), CT-diagnosed lung lesions, and incidence of increased CRP and creatinine were matched. Modeled center as a random effect in the multivariate analyses followed by adjustment for antiviral drug, lipid-lowering drug, D-dimer, and unilateral lesion.
The mixed-effect Cox model is a conditional model including a random per-center effect. Unmatched were adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic renal disease), and in-hospital medications (antiviral drug and lipid-lowering drug).
P values were calculated based on Cox proportional hazard model.
§
P values were calculated based on mixed-effect Cox model.
The incidence of DIC was 0 in the ACEI/ARB cohort. HR in DIC was not calculated.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative probability of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality during 28-day follow-up duration in ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor)/ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker) or non-ACEI/ARB cohort among 1128 patients with hypertension. The unmatched model and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) observation time was 28 (20–28) in ACEI/ARB cohort and 28 (19–28) in non-ACEI/ARB cohort (A). Propensity-score matched model and the median (IQR) observation time was 28 (20.5–28) in ACEI/ARB cohort and 28 (18–28) in non-ACEI/ARB cohort (B). The blips indicate censoring. HR indicates hazard ratio.
We further conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to account for confounding that may have resulted in a protective association between ACEI/ARB use and all-cause mortality. We successfully matched 174 patients with hypertension in the ACEI/ARB group to non-ACEI/ARB group at a ratio of 1:2, and 522 individuals were included in the propensity score-matched samples. Imbalanced in-hospital medications (antiviral drug and lipid-lowering drug), increase of D-dimer, and unilateral lung lesion after matching were adjusted in mixed-effect Cox model using site as a random effect. The results remained consistent and statistically significant, demonstrating lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients who received ACEI/ARB (adjusted HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15–0.89]; P=0.03) versus those who did not receive ACEI/ARB using this propensity score-matched analysis (Figure 2B and Table 3). To further assess the robustness of the association between ACEI/ARB use and mortality, we performed additional sensitivity analyses by using different matching variables. The results remained consistent and statistically significant in these sensitivity analyses with HRs of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.14–0.82; P=0.02) in the first sensitivity analysis and of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.13–0.80; P=0.01) in the second analysis.
Since there were 34.0% patients with hypertension who did not receive antihypertensive drugs during hospitalization, we performed subgroup propensity score-matching analysis on the remaining 745 patients who received at least one antihypertensive medication during hospitalization to further minimize the potential bias from nonusers. One hundred eighty-one patients using ACEI/ARB versus those using other antihypertensive drugs were paired at 1:1. Characteristics of matched and unmatched participants in this analysis were listed in Table IV in the Data Supplement. The results demonstrated that the in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.12–0.69]; P=0.005) due to COVID-19 (Figure II and Table V in the Data Supplement). This association was further supported by sensitivity analyses with adjusted HR of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12–0.70; P=0.01) in the first sensitivity analysis not including diabetes mellitus as a matching variable and of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13–0.71; P=0.01) in the second sensitivity analysis adding cerebrovascular disease as a matching variable.

Secondary Outcomes

The incidence of septic shock (IRD, −0.19 [95% CI, −0.36 to −0.01]) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (IRD, −0.09 [95%CI, −0.09 to 0.00]) were lower in the ACEI/ARB group than the non-ACEI/ARB group (Table 3). In the mixed-effect Cox model, use of ACEI/ARB was associated with lower risk of septic shock (adjusted HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.84]; P=0.02) compared with non-ACEI/ARB group (Table 3).
In propensity score-matched cohort analysis, the risk of septic shock was lower in ACEI/ARB group (adjusted HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.13−0.80]; P=0.01; IRD, −0.20 [95% CI, −0.39 to −0.01]) than non-ACEI/ARB group among all individuals with hypertension (Table 3). In a sub-group of patients, who received at least one antihypertensive medication during hospitalization, the findings remained consistent (adjusted HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10−0.63], P=0.003; IRD, −0.31 [95% CI, −0.54 to −0.09] for septic shock; Table V in the Data Supplement).

Comparison of Patients With Hypertension Versus Nonhypertension

Compared with patients in the normotensive group, the hypertensive group had a higher percentage of dyspnea, comorbidities, and abnormal laboratory markers on admission, and they received more intensive in-hospital interventions (Table III and Table VI in the Data Supplement). During the 28-day follow-up period, co-existing hypertension was significantly associated with the higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.03−1.94]; P=0.03) and the occurrence of multi-organ injury (Figure III and Table VII in the Data Supplement).

Discussion

In this multicenter retrospective study, in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality due to COVID-19 compared with either nonuse of ACEI/ARB or use of a different class of antihypertensive agent among patients with hypertension. Although it is plausible that unmeasured confounding may have contributed to the observed protective association, these data suggest that in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB was not associated with increased mortality in COVID-19. These findings provide clinical evidence in support of recently published guidance statements by several international societies to continue ACEI/ARB in patients with COVID-19.20,21 Given the retrospective nature of this study, these data need further validation in geographically diverse, prospective, cohort studies. Randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the efficacy of ACEI/ARB use in patients with hypertension and COVID-19.
Previous clinical studies have shown that hypertension is a risk factor for higher mortality in patients suffering from SARS and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.22–24 Similar to the association between hypertension and other previous outbreaks from coronavirus infections, recent studies in patients with COVID-19 have also reported that hypertension is associated with higher mortality in COVID-19 compared with normotensions.3,4 The underlying pathogenic mechanism linking hypertension and severity of COVID-19 infection remains to be elucidated. It has been hypothesized that excessive activation of RAS system might contribute to progression of COVID-19 related lung injury by promoting inflammatory response and cytokine storm,25 stimulating the NADH/NADPH oxidase system,26 and triggering cell contraction and vasoconstriction.27 Further studies are needed to better understand the underlying biological mechanisms involved in the association between hypertension and adverse outcomes in COVID-19.
In the management of patients with COVID-19 with hypertension, use of ACEI or ARB has been a contentious issue. These therapeutic effects involve ACE2, a known cellular receptor of SARS-COV-2 which is required for viral entry and propagation in host cells. ACEI and ARB treatment can increase ACE2 expression in animal-based studies.7,8 Potentially, ACEI/ARB might increase ACE2 expression, thus promoting SARS-COV-2 susceptibility and disease severity of COVID-19. Conversely, ACE2 negatively regulates RAS and serves as a counterbalance to ACE function. ACE2 expression is significantly downregulated after SARS-COV infection, contributing to hyper-activated RAS cascades.28 As a consequence, loss of ACE2 in mice confers resistance to SARS-COV infection, but also results in exacerbated vascular permeability, lung edema, neutrophil accumulation, and pulmonary dysfunction.10,29 Recombinant ACE2 protein protects against acute lung injury in mouse models of acute respiratory distress syndrome and SARS. A retrospective review of 539 consecutive hospitalized patients with viral pneumonia indicates that continuing in-hospital use of ACEI or ARB may reduce the risk of pneumonia and death (ACEI, odds ratio, 0.64 for risk of pneumonia; odds ratio, 0.25 for in-hospital death; ARB, odds ratio, 0.48 for risk of pneumonia; odds ratio, 0.75 for in-hospital death).30 A more recent study by Liu et al shows that plasma Ang II concentration is significantly elevated after SARS-COV-2 infection.31 The influence of ACEI/ARB on COVID-19 related outcomes has not been fully investigated. Furthermore, among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, it has been suggested that ARB might be more effective than ACEI to reduce the severity and mortality due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.32 This study was not powered to assess the differential beneficial effects of ACEI versus ARB in improving outcomes in COVID-19. The differential efficacy of ACEI and ARB use in improving COVID related outcomes also needs to be examined in further studies.
A statement jointly published by American Heart Association, the Heart Failure Society of America and the American College of Cardiology,20 and another statement from the International Society of Hypertension on COVID-1921 strongly recommended continuation of ACEI or ARB among patients with co-existing hypertension and COVID-19. The main argument in favor of continuation of ACEI/ARB was that there are no clinical data to show whether ACEI and ARB would either improve or worsen COVID-19. Therefore, it is not recommended to modify or change antihypertensive therapy before fully evaluating the possible influence of ACEI/ARB among patients with COVID-19. Our findings in this article provide evidence supporting continuous use of ACEI/ARB for patients with hypertension infected with SARS-COV-2. Comorbidities and in-hospital medications might lead confounding to the association between ACEI/ARB application with COVID-19 mortality. Previous studies have suggested that hypokalemia may be a marker of unopposed Ang II,33,34 and therefore, hypokalemia may modify the association between anti-hypertensive therapy and outcomes in COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to examine the role of hypokalemia and hypertension and ACEI/ARB use and its influence on COVID-19 severity. The protection effect of ACEI/ARB also may result from the favorable effect on microvascular complications, thus reduces cardiovascular and renal morbidity.35,36
Overall, these findings suggested potential beneficial effects observed with continued use of ACEI/ARB therapy and the possible contribution of RAS activation in the pathogenesis of severity of COVID-19 in patients with hypertension. Considering the impact of unmeasured potential confounders, we conducted E-value analysis and found that E-value was substantially greater than accepted risk factors for COVID-19 mortality. Therefore, it is not likely that an unmeasured confounder exists to modify the conclusion that ACEI/ARB use was not associated with increased COVID-19 mortality as observed in this study.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the study population originated from 9 hospitals in Hubei Province and may reflect natural history of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. It is plausible that the beneficial effects of ACEI/ARB may be different among patients who are managed in the outpatient setting or in ethnically or geographically diverse populations. Second, the study sample-size was modest and included 188 patients who received ACEI/ARB. It did not have the power to detect if there was a differential effect between ACEI and ARB. Third, since the retrospective nature of this study, some parameters were not available in all patients, and in-hospital medications might be not fully recorded. For instance, some patients with hypertension may have failed to report antihypertensive medication though self-administration (eg, Traditional Chinese Medicines) or might stop antihypertensive medication due to well-controlled blood pressure. Fourth, application of antihypertensive drugs was not matched or adjusted when comparing ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB groups since it is a key comparative factor for outcomes. The differences in proportions of patients using β-blocker and diuretics between ACEI/ARB and non-ACEI/ARB groups might induce unappreciated confounding to conclusion. Fifth, this study was not able to retrieve prehospital self-medications from in-hospital electronic record systems in the urgent circumstance of the COVID-19 pandemic, and thus was unable to account for their influence on the severity of presentation and outcomes. Therefore, large-scale prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials are needed in ethnically and geographically diverse cohorts to better understand the association between ACEI/ARB and survival in COVID-19.

Conclusions

Among patients with hypertension hospitalized with COVID-19, inpatient treatment with ACEI/ARB was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with ACEI/ARB nonusers. While study interpretation needs to consider the potential for residual confounders, it is unlikely that inpatient ACEI/ARB would be associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Novelty and Significance

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION
VIEW EDITORIAL:ACEing COVID-19

What Is Known?

Hypertension is the most common comorbidity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and had been suggested to be associated with increased mortality.
ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) are first-line medications for a large proportion of patients with hypertension.
Use of ACEI/ARB is a major concern for clinicians in treating COVID-19 patients with hypertension because of the potential effect of ACEI/ARB on increasing the expression of ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2), the binding receptor and entry point of the SARS-COV-2.

What New Information Does This Article Contribute?

The incidence of the 28-day all-cause death among patients who had inpatient treatment with ACEI/ARB is significant lower compared with ACEI/ARB nonusers, based on the analysis of 1128 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypertension.
After matching and adjusting variables potentially interfering the effect of ACEI/ARB, in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB still exhibits remarkable association with reduced all-cause mortality of patients with COVID-19 with hypertension.
These findings clearly support recently published recommendations regarding continuation of ACEI or ARB among patients with co-existing hypertension and COVID-19.
Application of ACEI/ARB is one of the major concerns in treating COVID-19 among patients with hypertension, for the possible increased risk by ACEI/ARB on increased ACE2, a direct receptor and entry point of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, the association between ACEI/ARB and COVID-19 mortality in patients with hypertension is largely unknown. Here, the multicentered retrospective cohort study indicated that in-hospital use of ACEI/ARB is associated with reduced 28-day all-cause mortality of COVID-19 compared with non-ACEI/ARB group in patients with hypertension. Findings in this study provide direct clinical data to show the potential benefit of ACEI/ARB in treating patients with hypertension and hospitalized with COVID-19 and support the continuous use of ACEI/ARB in those patients as recently recommend by societies.

Footnote

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACEI
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
ARB
angiotensin II receptor blocker
COVID-19
coronavirus disease 2019
CRP
C-reactive protein
cTNI
cardiac troponin I
cTNT
cardiac troponin T
HR
hazard ratio
hs-cTNI
high sensitivity cardiac troponin I
IRD
incidence rate difference
LDL-c
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
RAS
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
SARS
severe acute respiratory syndrome
SARS-COV
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Supplemental Material

File (317134_correction notice for atypon.pdf)
File (317134_online.pdf)

References

1.
Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:536–544. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
2.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
3.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, Wang B, Xiang H, Cheng Z, Xiong Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020; 323:1061–1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585
4.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395:1054–1062. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
5.
Flack JM, Adekola B. Blood pressure and the new ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30:160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.05.003
6.
Kovell LC, Ahmed HM, Misra S, Whelton SP, Prokopowicz GP, Blumenthal RS, McEvoy JW. US hypertension management guidelines: a review of the recent past and recommendations for the future. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002315. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002315
7.
Igase M, Kohara K, Nagai T, Miki T, Ferrario CM. Increased expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in conjunction with reduction of neointima by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:553–559. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.553
8.
Ferrario CM, Jessup J, Chappell MC, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, Tallant EA, Diz DI, Gallagher PE. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation. 2005;111:2605–2610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.510461
9.
Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579:265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3
10.
Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, Gao H, Guo F, Guan B, Huan Y, Yang P, Zhang Y, Deng W, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med. 2005;11:875–879. doi: 10.1038/nm1267
11.
National Health Commission of China. New Coronavirus Pneumonia Prevention and Control Program. 2020. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/: National Health Commission of China; 2020. Accessed February 8, 2020.
12.
World Health Organization. Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases Interim guidance. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/laboratory-testing-for-2019-novel-coronavirus-in-suspected-human-cases-20200117. Accessed March 19, 2020.
13.
World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection is suspected. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/clinical-management-of-severe-acute-respiratory-infection-when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected. Accessed March 13, 2020.
14.
Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, Barsoum RS, Burdmann EA, Goldstein SL, Herzog CA, Joannidis M, Kribben A, Levey AS, et al. Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.1
15.
Gando S, Wada H, Thachil J; Scientific and Standardization Committee on DIC of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Differentiating disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with the fibrinolytic phenotype from coagulopathy of trauma and acute coagulopathy of trauma-shock (COT/ACOTS). J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:826–835. doi: 10.1111/jth.12190
16.
Waljee AK, Mukherjee A, Singal AG, Zhang Y, Warren J, Balis U, Marrero J, Zhu J, Higgins PD. Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002847
17.
VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:268–274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607
18.
Mathur MB, Ding P, Riddell CA, VanderWeele TJ. Web site and R Package for computing E-values. Epidemiology. 2018;29:e45–e47. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000864
19.
Haneuse S, VanderWeele TJ, Arterburn D. Using the E-Value to assess the potential effect of unmeasured confounding in observational studies. JAMA. 2019;321:602–603. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21554
20.
American Heart Association (AHA), Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC). Patients taking ACE-i and ARBs who contract COVID-19 should continue treatment, unless otherwise advised by their physician. 2020. Available at: https://www.hfsa.org/patients-taking-ace-i-and-arbs-who-contract-covid-19-should-continue-treatment-unless-otherwise-advised-by-their-physician/. Accessed March 19, 2020.
21.
International Society of Hypertension. A statement from the International Society of Hypertension on COVID-19. 2020. Available at: https://ish-world.com/news/a/A-statement-from-the-International-Society-of-Hypertension-on-COVID-19/. Accessed March 5, 2020.
22.
Morra ME, Van Thanh L, Kamel MG, Ghazy AA, Altibi AMA, Dat LM, Thy TNX, Vuong NL, Mostafa MR, Ahmed SI, et al. Clinical outcomes of current medical approaches for Middle East respiratory syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2018;28:e1977. doi:10.1002/rmv.1977
23.
Matsuyama R, Nishiura H, Kutsuna S, Hayakawa K, Ohmagari N. Clinical determinants of the severity of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3881-4
24.
Chen M, Yang ZD, Smith KM, Carter JD, Nadler JL. Activation of 12-lipoxygenase in proinflammatory cytokine-mediated beta cell toxicity. Diabetologia. 2005;48:486–495. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1673-y
25.
Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Pons H, Johnson RJ. Role of the immune system in hypertension. Physiol Rev. 2017;97:1127–1164. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2016
26.
Zhang Y, Murugesan P, Huang K, Cai H. NADPH oxidases and oxidase crosstalk in cardiovascular diseases: novel therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:170–194. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0260-8
27.
Dhaun N, Webb DJ. Endothelins in cardiovascular biology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:491–502. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0176-3
28.
Kuba K, Imai Y, Penninger JM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in lung diseases. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.03.001
29.
Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature. 2005;436:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712
30.
Henry C, Zaizafoun M, Stock E, Ghamande S, Arroliga AC, White HD. Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on viral pneumonia. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018;31:419–423. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2018.1499293
31.
Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, Huang F, Wang F, Yuan J, Wang Z, Li J, Li J, Feng C, et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63:364–374. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1643-8
32.
Lai CC, Wang YH, Wang CY, Wang HC, Yu CJ, Chen L. Comparative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on the risk of pneumonia and severe exacerbations in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:867–874. doi:10.2147/COPD.S158634
33.
Te Riet L, van Esch JH, Roks AJ, van den Meiracker AH, Danser AH. Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations. Circ Res. 2015;116:960–975. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303587
34.
Kozhuharov N, Goudev A, Flores D, Maeder MT, Walter J, Shrestha S, Gualandro DM, de Oliveira Junior MT, Sabti Z, Müller B, et al; GALACTIC Investigators. Effect of a strategy of comprehensive vasodilation vs usual care on mortality and heart failure rehospitalization among patients with acute heart failure: the GALACTIC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322:2292–2302. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18598
35.
Paulus WJ, Tschöpe C. A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092
36.
Wang TZ, Kodiyanplakkal RPL, Calfee DP. Antimicrobial resistance in nephrology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15:463–481. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0150-7

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation Research
Go to Circulation Research
Circulation Research
Pages: 1671 - 1681
PubMed: 32302265

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 13 April 2020
Revision received: 17 April 2020
Accepted: 17 April 2020
Published online: 17 April 2020
Published in print: 5 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor
  2. angiotensin II receptor blocker
  3. coronavirus
  4. COVID-19
  5. hypertension
  6. inpatients

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Peng Zhang*
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Medical Science Research Center (P.Z., Y.-X.J., H.L.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Basic Medical School, Wuhan University (P.Z., L. Lin, H.L.)
Lihua Zhu*
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Jingjing Cai*
Cardiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (J. Cai)
Fang Lei*
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Juan-Juan Qin*
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Jing Xie
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Ye-Mao Liu
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Yan-Ci Zhao
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Xuewei Huang
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Lijin Lin
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Basic Medical School, Wuhan University (P.Z., L. Lin, H.L.)
Meng Xia
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Ming-Ming Chen
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Xu Cheng
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Xiao Zhang
Eye Center (X.Z.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Deliang Guo
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery (D.G., H.W., Y. Yuan), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Yuanyuan Peng
Cardiology (Y.P.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Yan-Xiao Ji
Medical Science Research Center (P.Z., Y.-X.J., H.L.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Jing Chen
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Zhi-Gang She
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Yibin Wang
Anesthesiology, Cardiovascular Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Y.W.)
Qingbo Xu
Centre for Clinic Pharmacology, The William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (Q.X.)
Renfu Tan
Wuhan Kanghuashuhai Technology Company (R.T.), Wuhan
Haitao Wang
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery (D.G., H.W., Y. Yuan), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Jun Lin
Gastroenterology (J.L.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Pengcheng Luo
Urology (P.L.), Wuhan Third Hospital & Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University
Shouzhi Fu
Intensive Care Unit (S.F.), Wuhan Third Hospital & Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University
Hongbin Cai
Wuhan Ninth Hospital (H.C., M.L.)
Ping Ye
Cardiology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan (P.Y., M.C.)
Bing Xiao
Stomatology, Xiantao First People’s Hospital (B.X.)
Weiming Mao
General Surgery, Huanggang Central Hospital, Wuhan, China (W.M.)
Liming Liu
General Surgery, Ezhou Central Hospital (L. Liu)
Youqin Yan
Infections Department, Wuhan Seventh Hospital (Y. Yan)
Mingyu Liu
Wuhan Ninth Hospital (H.C., M.L.)
Manhua Chen
Cardiology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan (P.Y., M.C.)
Xiao-Jing Zhang
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Xinghuan Wang
Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine (X.W.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Urology (X.W.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Rhian M. Touyz
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (R.M.T.)
Jiahong Xia
Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital (J.Xia), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Bing-Hong Zhang
Neonatology (B.-H.Z.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Xiaodong Huang
Gastroenterology (X.H.), Wuhan Third Hospital & Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University
Yufeng Yuan [email protected]
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery (D.G., H.W., Y. Yuan), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Rohit Loomba [email protected]
NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, University of California San Diego, CA (R.L.)
Peter P. Liu [email protected]
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada (P.P.L.).
From the Cardiology (P.Z., L.Z., J.-J.Q., J. Xie, Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, M.-M.C., X.C., Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
Medical Science Research Center (P.Z., Y.-X.J., H.L.), Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Institute of Model Animal of Wuhan University (P.Z., L.Z., F.L., J.-J.Q., Y.-M.L., Y.-C.Z., X. Huang, L. Lin, M.X., M.-M.C., X.C., Y.-X.J., J. Chen, Z.-G.S., X.-J.Z., H.L.)
Basic Medical School, Wuhan University (P.Z., L. Lin, H.L.)

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally.
H.L., P.P.L., R.L., and Y.Y. are co-corresponding authors.
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 1680.
The Data Supplement is available with this article at Supplemental Material.
Correspondence to: Hongliang Li, MD, PhD, Cardiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 99 Zhangzhidong Rd, Wuhan 430060, China, Email [email protected]
Peter P. Liu, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Email [email protected]
Rohit Loomba, MD, MHSc, Division of Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, University of California at San Diego, Email [email protected]
Yufeng Yuan, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Email [email protected]

Author Contributions

P. Zhang, L. Zhu, F. Lei, J. Cai, and J.J. Qin designed study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote article. Y.-C. Zhao, X. Huang, L. Lin, M. Xia, M.-M. Chen, Y.-X. Ji, H. Wang, J. Lin, P. Luo, S. Fu, H. Cai, P. Ye, B. Xiao, W. Mao, L. Liu, Y. Yan, M. Liu, M. Chen, B.-H. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Xia, and X. Huang collected and reviewed clinical, laboratory, and radiological data. Y.-M. Liu, X. Cheng, and J. Chen performed statistical analysis. J. Xie, X. Zhang, D. Guo, and Y. Peng reviewed, interpreted, and checked clinical data. X.-J. Zhang, Z.-G. She, Y. Wang, Q. Xu, R. Tan, and R.M. Touyz wrote article and provided valuable suggestions for study design and data analysis. Y. Yuan, R. Loomba, P. Luo, and H. Li contributed equally, designed the project, edited article, and supervised the study. All authors have approved the final version of this article.

Disclosures

None.
Supplemental Materials
Online Tables I–VII
Online Figures I–III

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFF0101504, 2020YFC0845500), the National Science Foundation of China (81630011, 81970364, 81970070, 81970011, 81870171, and 81700356), the Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91639304), the Hubei Science and Technology Support Project (2019BFC582, 2018BEC473, and 2017BEC001), and Medical flight plan of Wuhan University.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. A Critical Review on the Long-Term COVID-19 Impacts on Patients With Diabetes, The American Journal of Medicine, 138, 2, (308-329), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.02.029
    Crossref
  2. Role of renin-angiotensin system/angiotensin converting enzyme-2 mechanism and enhanced COVID-19 susceptibility in type 2 diabetes mellitus, World Journal of Diabetes, 15, 4, (606-622), (2024).https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i4.606
    Crossref
  3. Characteristics Associated with COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections after Booster Vaccinations in Healthcare Workers: Insights from the TüSeRe:exact Study, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13, 6, (1571), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061571
    Crossref
  4. Targeting the High-Density Lipoprotein Proteome for the Treatment of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25, 8, (4522), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25084522
    Crossref
  5. Kidney and Liver Predictors of Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection, COVID, 4, 4, (452-465), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/covid4040030
    Crossref
  6. Lisinopril increases lung ACE2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 viral load and decreases inflammation but not disease severity in experimental COVID-19, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1414406
    Crossref
  7. The possible mechanism and research progress of ACE2 involved in cardiovascular injury caused by COVID-19: a review, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 11, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1409723
    Crossref
  8. Role of Natural Products against the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 by Inhibition of ACE-2 Receptor: A Review, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 30, 32, (2562-2573), (2024).https://doi.org/10.2174/0113816128320161240703092622
    Crossref
  9. Evaluation of blood pressure variation in recovered COVID-19 patients at one-year follow-up: a retrospective cohort study, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 24, 1, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-03916-w
    Crossref
  10. Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers on Adverse Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients, Cardiology, (1-10), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1159/000540499
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response