Skip to main content

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Frequent premature atrial complexes (PACs) are associated with future incident atrial fibrillation (AF), but whether PACs contribute to development of AF through adverse atrial remodeling has not been studied. This study aimed to explore the effect of frequent PACs from different sites on atrial remodeling in a swine model.

METHODS:

Forty swine underwent baseline electrophysiologic studies and echocardiography followed by pacemaker implantations and paced PACs (50% burden) at 250-ms coupling intervals for 16 weeks in 4 groups: (1) lateral left atrium (LA) PACs by the coronary sinus (Lat-PAC; n=10), (2) interatrial septal PACs (Sep-PAC; n=10), (3) regular LA pacing at 130 beats/min (Reg-130; n=10), and (4) controls without PACs (n=10). At the final study, repeat studies were performed, followed by tissue histology and molecular analyses focusing on fibrotic pathways.

RESULTS:

Lat-PACs were associated with a longer P-wave duration (93.0±9.0 versus 74.2±8.2 and 58.8±7.6 ms; P<0.001) and greater echocardiographic mechanical dyssynchrony (57.5±11.6 versus 35.7±13.0 and 24.4±11.1 ms; P<0.001) compared with Sep-PACs and controls, respectively. After 16 weeks, Lat-PACs led to slower LA conduction velocity (1.1±0.2 versus 1.3±0.2 [Sep-PAC] versus 1.3±0.1 [Reg-130] versus 1.5±0.2 [controls] m/s; P<0.001) without significant change in atrial ERP. The Lat-PAC group had a significantly increased percentage of LA fibrosis and upregulated levels of extracellular matrix proteins (lysyl oxidase and collagen 1 and 8), as well as TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor–β1) signaling proteins (latent and monomer TGF-β1 and phosphorylation/total ratio of SMAD2/3; P<0.05). The Lat-PAC group had the longest inducible AF duration (terminal to baseline: 131 [interquartile range 30, 192] seconds versus 16 [6, 26] seconds [Sep-PAC] versus 22 [11, 64] seconds [Reg-130] versus −1 [−16, 7] seconds [controls]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this swine model, frequent PACs resulted in adverse atrial structural remodeling with a heightened propensity to AF. PACs originating from the lateral LA produced greater atrial remodeling and longer induced AF duration than the septal-origin PACs. These data provide evidence that frequent PACs can cause adverse atrial remodeling as well as AF, and that the location of ectopic PACs may be clinically meaningful.

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

Frequent premature atrial contractions promote electrical (slow conduction) and structural (enlargement and fibrosis) changes in the atrium.
These premature atrial contraction–induced structural and electrical changes (remodeling) promote a substrate that more easily maintains atrial fibrillation.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Inhibition of fibrosis through pharmacologic or gene therapy could block the process that leads to the fibrotic atrial myopathy that promotes atrial fibrillation.
Elimination of frequent premature atrial contractions, through medical therapy or catheter ablation, may represent a novel upstream therapy that reduces the burden of atrial fibrillation in this population.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice.1–3 Premature atrial complexes (PACs) arising from the pulmonary veins are responsible for the initiation of AF1,2; however, maintenance of AF requires a vulnerable atrial substrate. Numerous factors may contribute to the development of atrial remodeling, such as structural heart disease, sleep apnea, and obesity.3 Population-based cohort studies have demonstrated an association between frequent PACs and incident AF.4,5 However, whether frequent PACs are only an epiphenomenon or contribute to the development of AF through adverse atrial remodeling or simply by an increased frequency of triggers has not been defined.
Frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) have been shown to trigger a secondary ventricular cardiomyopathy.6 We previously demonstrated in a swine model of frequent PVCs that dyssynchronous PVCs lead to ventricular dilatation and a decreased left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF).7 Given the association of PACs and AF, it is possible that an analogous process occurs in the atrium, whereby frequent dyssynchronous PACs contribute to atrial remodeling as well as AF maintenance. Therefore, we hypothesized that frequent PACs would cause adverse atrial remodeling and greater AF maintenance and that dyssynchronous PACs arising from the lateral left atrium (LA) would lead to greater atrial dyssynchrony, remodeling, and AF compared with septal or no PACs.

METHODS

We studied 40 female Yucatan mini-swine with a 50% burden of paced PACs at a 250-ms coupling interval in 4 groups: (1) paced PACs from the lateral LA by the coronary sinus (Lat-PAC; n=10), (2) paced PACs from the interatrial septum (Sep-PAC; n=10), (3) regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate (130 beats/min) than during PACs (Reg-130; n=10), and (4) a control group without pacing (controls; n=10). All animals underwent a comprehensive electrophysiologic and echocardiographic assessment at baseline and 16 weeks (terminal study), with the protocol summarized in Figure 1A and detailed below. The study was approved and overseen by the Laboratory Animal Resource Center at the University of California, San Francisco. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Figure 1. Study protocol. A, Baseline and terminal study flowchart describing the protocol for the 4 groups of swine in the study (see Methods). Location of the pacing lead on anteroposterior fluoroscopy and gross pathology (yellow arrows) after death is shown for representative animals in the paced premature ventricular complexes from the lateral left atrium by the coronary sinus (B) and paced premature ventricular complexes from the interatrial septum groups (C). EP indicates electrophysiology; ERP, effective refractory period; IAS, interatrial septum; LA, left atrial; LAA, left atrial appendage; LV, left ventricle; PAC, premature atrial complex; PPM, pacemaker; RAA, right atrial appendage; and TA, tricuspid annulus.

Baseline Electrophysiologic Study

After the animals were fasted overnight, anesthesia was induced with an intramuscular injection of ketamine and acepromazine and maintained by inhalation of 1% to 5% isoflurane (1.5% to 2% for most animals), with each swine mechanically ventilated with 100% oxygen. Femoral venous access was obtained by a percutaneous puncture using the modified Seldinger technique with ultrasound guidance. A temporary, steerable mapping catheter was placed through a femoral vein sheath and atrial effective refractory periods (ERPs) were measured at each of the following pacing sites: right atrial free wall, right interatrial septum, and coronary sinus (Figure S1A). Single paced atrial extrastimuli were delivered at a 400-ms coupling interval from the previous atrial complex and decremented by 10 ms until loss of capture, with a 5-second pause between extrastimuli (sensed extrastimuli that were delivered to mimic spontaneous PACs). The atrial ERP was defined as the longest coupling interval without atrial capture. After a 10-minute waiting period, AF induction was attempted 3 times from the 3 atrial sites (total of 9 attempts) with burst atrial pacing (cycle length, 50 ms of 15 seconds; Figure S1B). All atrial pacing, including extrastimulus testing (ERP measurements) and burst pacing (AF induction), was performed using the same stimulus strength (4 mA; duration 2 ms) for uniformity.
AF sustainability, defined as the average of the maximum AF duration at each of the 3 sites, and AF inducibility, defined as the percentage of an inducible AF duration of ≥5 seconds among a total of 9 AF induction attempts, were assessed.

Pacemaker Implantation and Pacing Protocol

The right neck was cut down to expose the external jugular vein. The vein was tied distally, and after an anterior venotomy was performed, 2 pacemaker leads were introduced directly. One bipolar active fixation lead (Medtronic 5076) was placed in the right atrial appendage (RAA) for sensing. A second pacing lead was implanted in the distal coronary sinus aiming to maximize atrial dyssynchrony (Lat-PAC; Figure 1B) or the interatrial septum (Sep-PAC; Figure 1C). In the regular atrial pacing group (Reg-130), only a single lead was introduced into the distal coronary sinus. A biventricular pacemaker (Syncra or Viva CRT-P; Medtronic) was used to create paced PACs. The RAA lead was connected to the atrial port for sensing intrinsic atrial depolarizations, and the second lead was attached to the LV port for sequential atrial pacing and prevention of oversensing. The right ventricular port was plugged.
After 1 week of recovery, the pacemakers were programmed from sensing-only mode (ODO) to DDD mode to create paced atrial bigeminy (50% PAC burden; Figure S2). For the Reg-130 group, the pacemakers were programmed to the SSI mode to allow constant atrial overdrive pacing at 130 beats/min. In a preliminary study, the mean atrial rates during sinus rhythm and bigeminal PACs were 89±10 versus 121±12 beats/min, respectively (Figure S3). Therefore, regular atrial pacing at 130 beats/min would allow higher atrial rates than those during bigeminal PACs.
For the sensing lead in the RAA, the atrial pacing threshold was set to the minimum level to avoid any unnecessary atrial pacing. The PAC coupling interval (sensed atrioventricular delay on the pacemaker) was programmed to a short coupling interval of 250 ms. This aimed to ensure that the PACs were not conducted to the ventricle, thereby negating any potential confounding attributable to ventricular irregularity. The pacing output was set to ensure atrial capture of the bigeminal PACs while avoiding ventricular and phrenic nerve capture. Pacemaker interrogations were performed at monthly intervals to confirm effective sensing, atrial capture, and absence of AF. Ten pigs underwent the same baseline and terminal electrophysiology study and echocardiography protocol but no pacemaker implantation and were included as controls (n=10).

Transthoracic Echocardiography

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE; M5Sc-D probe/Vivid E95 system; GE Healthcare) was performed at baseline and monthly thereafter. All swine were sedated with midazolam (0.3–0.5 mg/kg), ketamine (12.5 mg/kg), and inhaled isoflurane (1%–5%) by mask. Echo images were then acquired using a 3.5-MHz transducer placed in the left parasternal area in the right lateral decubitus position. The LA area was measured in a blinded fashion using images that were obtained from a modified apical 4-chamber view at end-systole, taking care to exclude the LA appendage and pulmonary veins (Figure S4A). LA function was quantified by measuring the peak LA reservoir strain using 2-dimensional speckle-tracking strain analysis software (EchoPAC version 201; GE Healthcare). A longitudinal strain curve was generated during sinus rhythm and gated for the atrial wall motion among 6 LA segments obtained from the modified apical 4-chamber view at a frame rate of ≥70 frames per second. The peak LA strain was assessed by measuring the average of the peak longitudinal strain across 6 LA segments using the QRS onset as a reference point (Figure S4B). LV function was also quantified by measuring the LVEF using M-mode in the parasternal short-axis view (Figure S5).

Electrical and Mechanical Atrial Dyssynchrony

At baseline, electrical and mechanical atrial dyssynchrony were evaluated during sinus rhythm or regular pacing from the lateral LA pacing leads or interatrial septal pacing leads at 120 beats/min. The maximum P-wave duration was measured to assess the total atrial conduction time (electrical dyssynchrony) between sinus rhythm and that during regular atrial pacing from the septum and coronary sinus (LA). The maximum P-wave duration was measured from the earliest onset to the latest offset in all ECG leads at a sweep speed of 100 mm/s (Figure 2A). Measurements were made using digital calipers on an electrophysiologic recording system. Furthermore, 2-dimensional speckle tracking strain analysis software (EchoPAC, version 202; GE Vingmed ultrasound) was used to assess mechanical intra-atrial dyssynchrony. The difference in time to peak of the earliest and latest activated segments among the 6 LA segments was measured and the mechanical regional incoordination was assessed during sinus rhythm and at the 2 different pacing sites (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. Measurements of left atrial dyssynchrony. A, Electrical dyssynchrony was assessed by measuring the max P-wave duration (total atrial conduction time) per pacing site. The max P-wave duration is measured from the earliest onset to the latest offset in all ECG leads using digital calipers on a polygraph system. B, Mechanical dyssynchrony was assessed by measuring the regional coordination among 6 left atrial (LA) segments according to the pacing site. The difference in the time to peak of the earliest and latest activated segments among the 6 LA segments was measured during regular constant pacing (120 ppm) from each pacing lead. During septal pacing, the atrial segments on the septal side have the earliest time-to-peak activation; during lateral pacing, those on the lateral side show the earliest time-to-peak activation.

Terminal Study

After 16 weeks, the electrophysiology study and TTE were repeated under general anesthesia using the same protocol as the baseline study. Before the study, the pacemakers were turned off for 24 hours to prevent any acute effects of frequent PACs. If burst pacing–induced AF did not convert to sinus rhythm spontaneously after 7 minutes, electrical cardioversion was performed (this never occurred during the baseline study). In addition, a transseptal puncture was undertaken, guided by intracardiac echocardiography and fluoroscopy using a deflectable sheath (Agilis; Abbott Technologies) and BRK needle. After the deflectable sheath was introduced into the LA, the mean LA pressure was obtained during sinus rhythm. The mean aortic pressure was also measured by the femoral artery sheath during sinus rhythm. A multipolar grid catheter (HD-Grid; Abbott) with 3-3-3–mm interelectrode spacing was then introduced into the right atrium (RA) as well as LA and high-density 3-dimensional electroanatomic maps were created (NavX EnSite Velocity system version 3.0; Abbott) during sinus rhythm (Figure S6). The distribution of the unipolar electrogram voltage among all the RA and LA points was evaluated offline. Conduction velocity was assessed on the LA posterior wall using 5 electrogram pairs from each pacing site for each animal, blinded to group. The local activation time was measured perpendicular to the isochrones in areas of least isochronal crowding, with the conduction velocity measured as the surface distance between each point pair divided by the difference in the local activation time.

Hemodynamic Effect of Nonconducted Versus Conducted PACs

An acute study with 5 additional swine was conducted to examine the LA pressure during bigeminal nonconducted PACs versus conducted PACs, delivered from the coronary sinus, to better understand the hemodynamic effect of the PACs against a closed mitral valve. The LA pressure and aortic pressure were recorded during sinus rhythm, bigeminal nonconducted PACs at a coupling interval of 250 ms, and bigeminal conducted PACs at a coupling interval of 350 ms, which allowed conduction to the ventricle, using the same methods as the terminal study.

Histological Analysis

The swine were euthanized and full-thickness 2-cm2 samples were obtained from the LA posterior wall, LA anterior wall, and RA appendages. Sections were preserved in buffered formalin and embedded with paraffin. Sections from each sample were then stained with Masson trichrome and quantification of fibrous tissue was performed on photomicrographs taken using brightfield microscopy. Fibrosis was then quantified by analysis of magnified (×20) images from each section using ImageJ version 1.52 software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij) by counting the number of blue-stained pixels. Perivascular areas were avoided. Fibrous tissue content was expressed as a percentage of field area and averaged across 7 pictures in each LA site. Analyses were performed on coded specimens blinded to pacing group assignment.

Molecular Analysis (Immunoblots)

Five different biological replicates (tissue samples) were generated from the specific regions of the heart. Tissue chunks were harvested, snap frozen, and kept at −80 °C until lysis. Tissue pieces (50 mg) were aliquoted in 2-mL reinforced tubes containing 2.8-mm ceramic beads and lysed with Fisherbrand Bead Mill 24 homogenizer using a lysis solution containing radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (9806; Cell Signaling Technology), protease inhibitors (P8340; Sigma-Aldrich), and phosphatase inhibitors (PhosSTOP; Sigma-Aldrich). All the lysates were clarified twice with ultracentrifugation, aliquoted, and kept at −20 °C. Rapid Gold bicinchoninic acid assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to quantify protein concentration. Proteins were denatured at 70 °C for 10 minutes in SDS, and 10 μg of samples were loaded on either 4% to 12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels or 3% to 8% NuPAGE Tris-Acetate gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After gel electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to 0.45-µM polyvinylidene difluoride membranes using a wet-transfer system (XCell II Blot Module). Membranes were subsequently blocked with 5% milk for 1 hour at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used: extracellular proteins: collagen 1 (ab138492; Abcam), collagen 8 (102-11285; RayBiotech), fibronectin (ab6328; Abcam), periostin (ab92460; Abcam), LOX (lysyl oxidase; ab174316; Abcam), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β; 3711; Cell Signaling Technology), TGF-β-r2 (ab186838; Abcam), p-Smad2/3, and Smad 2/3 (8828 and 8685; Cell Signaling Technology); and internal control: GAPDH (5174; Cell Signaling Technology). Equal protein loading and transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes was verified with Ponceau S staining solution (59803; Cell Signaling Technology). After the overnight primary antibody incubation, polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were washed several times with TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase–linked secondary antibody (NA9340 or NA9310; GE Healthcare) for 1 hour at room temperature. SuperSignal West Femto Maximum-Sensitivity Substrate, an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent from Thermo Fisher Scientific (34095), was used to visualize the bands. Semiquantification (relative abundance) of proteins was conducted by comparing the relative intensity of bands against their respective GAPDH abundance using ImageJ software. Samples were run, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, exposed, and developed at the same time to minimize variability in loading and chemiluminescence substrate exposure. Equal protein loading was also validated in the aliquots using Coomassie and UV absorbance in gels. Normality testing was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical significance was calculated using the nonparametric test, Kruskal-Wallis 1-way ANOVA, followed by the Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli procedure. Statistical analysis for molecular data was performed in R statistical software (version 4.3.1).

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized using mean and SD (if normally distributed) or median and interquartile range (IQR; if skewed); categorical variables were summarized as proportions. A comparison of means between continuous variables was performed using either an unpaired t test or 1-way ANOVA for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test for skewed data. Normality was assessed by using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For ANOVA, a Tukey post hoc test was conducted for multiple comparisons. Data analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows (version 23; IBM). Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty swine underwent baseline and terminal electrophysiology studies; 5 underwent only acute hemodynamic study. Body weight was similar at baseline (controls, 34.9±3.3; Reg-130, 32.4±2.2; Sep-PAC, 33.4±4.0; Lat-PAC, 33.8±4.1 kg; P=0.51) and at the terminal study (controls, 48.0±5.7; Reg-130, 46.2±2.6; Sep-PAC, 49.0±2.6; Lat-PAC, 48.0±4.7 kg; P=0.50). Thirty swine underwent pacemaker implantation (10 each in the Reg-130, Sep-PAC, and Lat-PAC groups) with atrial pacing bigeminy from the assigned pacing site successfully established; 10 swine served as controls without PACs.

Atrial Dyssynchrony Associated With the Different PAC Models

Baseline electrical atrial dyssynchrony was greater during lateral LA pacing than atrial septal pacing and sinus rhythm (P-wave duration: sinus rhythm, 58.8±7.6; septal pacing, 74.2±8.2; lateral pacing, 93.0±9.0 ms; P<0.001; Figure 3A). Mechanical atrial dyssynchrony assessed by a 2-dimensional speckle tracking strain analysis was greater during lateral LA pacing than septal pacing and sinus rhythm (sinus rhythm, 24.4±11.1; septal pacing, 35.7±13.0; lateral pacing, 57.5±11.6 ms; P<0.001), confirming greater electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony during lateral LA pacing (Figure 3B).
Figure 3. Electrical and mechanical atrial dyssynchrony. A, Electrical atrial dyssynchrony as assessed by the max P-wave duration according to the pacing site. B, Mechanical dyssynchrony as assessed by 2-dimensional speckle tracking strain analysis. LA indicates left atrial.

Chronic Atrial Structural Remodeling

The change in the LA area after 16 weeks of paced atrial bigeminy is summarized in Figure 4A. The Lat-PAC group had the greatest increase in the LA area, followed by the Sep-PAC and Reg-130 groups, and then the nonpaced controls (terminal – baseline; controls, 0.9±0.4 cm2; Reg-130, 3.0±0.8 cm2; Sep-PAC, 4.1±2.0 cm2; Lat-PAC, 5.9±1.2 cm2; P<0.001; Figure 4A). Changes in the LA area over time among the 3 groups are shown in Figure S7. Gradual LA enlargement was observed upon establishing PACs in the Sep-PAC and Lat-PAC groups. Decrease in the peak reservoir strain was greatest in the Lat-PAC group, followed by the Sep-PAC, Reg-130, and control groups, in that order (terminal – baseline; controls, −0.7±4.2%; Reg-130, −8.6±3.0%; Sep-PAC, −12.7±4.1%; Lat-PAC, −17.3±3.2%; P<0.001; Figure 4B). Echocardiographic measures at the terminal study in each group are summarized in Table S1.
Figure 4. Left atrial size and function after frequent premature atrial complexes. Change in the left atrial (LA) area (A) and LA peak reservoir strain between the baseline and 16-week terminal studies (B) in each group. Lat-PAC indicates paced premature ventricular complexes from the lateral left atrium by the coronary sinus; Reg-130, regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate than during premature ventricular complexes; and Sep-PAC, paced premature ventricular complexes from the interatrial septum.

Chronic Atrial Electrical Remodeling

Overall, the change in average atrial ERP after 16 weeks of atrial bigeminy at the 3 sites (terminal − baseline) did not differ in the Lat-PAC and Sep-PAC groups. The atrial ERP only decreased significantly in the Reg-130 group (terminal − baseline: controls, −3.2±23.7; Reg-130, −24.4±13.7; Sep-PAC, 8.3±36.0; Lat-PAC, −4.0±23.6 ms; P=0.05; Figure 5A). On the posterior LA wall, the Lat-PAC swine had significantly lower conduction velocities at 16 weeks versus the Reg-130 and control groups (controls, 1.5±0.2; Reg-130, 1.3±0.1; Sep-PAC, 1.3±0.2; Lat-PAC, 1.1±0.2 m/s; P<0.001; Figure 5B). The distribution of unipolar voltage values in the LA and RA among all points is shown in Figure S8. The acquired points for use of the analysis did not differ among the groups (LA: controls, 2016±542; Reg-130, 2322±520; Sep-PAC, 1786±629; Lat-PAC, 2109±648 [P=0.47]; RA: controls, 2441±673; Reg-130, 2083±283; Sep-PAC, 2399±834; Lat-PAC, 2672±901 [P=0.70]). The Lat-PAC group had a higher proportion of low-voltage zones in both the RA and LA, as defined by a percent area <1.0 mV, than the other groups, with a leftward shift in the voltage distribution (LA: controls, 1.8±1.7%; Reg-130, 4.6±3.2%; Sep-PAC, 7.4±11.2%; Lat-PAC, 17.2±11.8% [P=0.02]; RA: controls, 2.7±0.9%; Reg-130, 7.5±1.9%; Sep-PAC, 9.2±4.2%; Lat-PAC, 15.1±8.6% [P=0.01]).
Figure 5. Left atrial electrophysiology after frequent premature atrial complexes. A, Change in the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) between the baseline and 16-week terminal studies in each group. The atrial ERPs are obtained by the average of the ERPs on the right atrial free wall, right atrial midseptum, and coronary sinus. B, Left atrial (LA) posterior wall conduction velocity (CV) during the terminal study in each group. Lat-PAC indicates paced premature ventricular complexes from the lateral left atrium by the coronary sinus; Reg-130, regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate than during premature ventricular complexes; and Sep-PAC, paced premature ventricular complexes from the interatrial septum.

Chronic Change in Hemodynamics

In the terminal study, both the Lat-PAC and Sep-PAC groups exhibited a significantly higher mean LA pressure than the controls (Figure S9A) despite no significant change in mean aortic pressure (Figure S9B).

LV Function

The control pigs exhibited a higher mean ventricular heart rate than the PAC pigs, but no difference was found between the Sep-PAC and Lat-PAC groups (controls, 88±11; Sep-PAC, 65±8; Lat-PAC, 66±9 bpm; P<0.001). PACs were nonconducted to the ventricle in all pigs, and the Lat-PAC and Sep-PAC groups had no change in LVEF. In contrast, atrial constant pacing at 130/min for 16 weeks led to a significant small LVEF decline (terminal − baseline: controls, 0.7±3.3; Reg-130, −6.5±4.9; Sep-PAC, 0.5±4.0; Lat-PAC, −2.5±6.2%; P=0.006; Figure S10).

AF Induction

After 16 weeks of PACs, the increase in the average duration of induced AF between the terminal and baseline study was greatest in the Lat-PAC group (controls, −1 [IQR, −16, 7]; Reg-130, 22 [11, 64]; Sep-PAC, 16 [IQR 6, 26]; Lat-PAC, 131 [IQR 30, 192] seconds; P<0.001; Figure 6A). The increase in AF inducibility between the terminal and baseline study was also greatest in the Lat-PAC group, followed by the Sep-PAC and Reg-130 groups, and then controls (controls, −2.2±16.2%; Reg-130, 24.4±18.8%; Sep-PAC, 32.6±23.2%; Lat-PAC, 49.3±13.0%; P<0.001; Figure 6B). All induced AF events were composed of irregular atrial activity and no regular atrial tachyarrhythmias were observed.
Figure 6. Atrial fibrillation maintenance after frequent premature atrial complexes. A, Atrial fibrillation (AF) sustainability: change in duration of induced AF between baseline and 16-week terminal studies in each group. AF sustainability was defined as the average of maximum AF duration obtained on the right atrial free wall, right atrial midseptum, and coronary sinus. Cardioversion was performed after 7 minutes (420 seconds) of sustained AF. B, AF inducibility: change in the percentage of an inducible AF duration of ≥5 seconds among the 9 total AF induction attempts between the baseline and 16-week terminal studies in each group. Lat-PAC indicates paced premature ventricular complexes from the lateral left atrium by the coronary sinus; Reg-130, regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate than during premature ventricular complexes; and Sep-PAC, paced premature ventricular complexes from the interatrial septum.

Hemodynamic Effect of Nonconducted Versus Conducted PACs

Figure S11 summarizes the LA and aortic pressure during nonconducted versus conducted PACs. The magnitude of the additional a-wave generated by the PAC atrial contraction was, paradoxically, much smaller during nonconducted (PAC-a in Figure S11B) than conducted PACs (PAC-a in Figure S11C), presumably because of reduced time for atrial filling. Figure S11D summarizes the LA pressure values of sinus rhythm–a versus nonconducted PAC-a versus conducted PAC-a. Whereas the LA pressure during conducted PACs (at a longer coupling interval) is higher than during nonconducted PACs, the difference did not reach statistical significance because of the small sample size (P=0.10).

Histopathology

LA and RA histological fibrosis in each group is summarized in Figure 7. The Lat-PAC group had the greatest degree of fibrosis, followed by Sep-PAC and Reg-130, and then control pigs, on LA anterior wall (controls, 3.9±1.7%; Reg-130, 5.6±1.2%; Sep-PAC, 5.8±1.6%; Lat-PAC, 7.7±1.6%; P<0.001; Figure 7E) and LA posterior wall (controls, 4.0±1.5%; Reg-130, 6.2±1.7%; Sep-PAC, 6.6±1.4%; Lat-PAC, 8.6±1.0%; P<0.001; Figure 7F).
Figure 7. Histopathology. Representative histological slides for the control (A), regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate than during premature ventricular complexes (B; Reg-130), septal premature atrial complex (PAC; C), and lateral left atrial (LA; D) PAC groups. Differences in the histological percentage of fibrosis in the LA anterior wall (E), LA posterior wall (F), and right atrial (RA) appendages (G) by group are shown.

Molecular Analysis

Molecular analysis of fibrosis-related proteins demonstrated that the chronic PAC model was characterized by upregulation of several extracellular matrix proteins as well as TGF-β1 signaling (Figure 8; Figure S12). Collagen 1 levels were significantly higher in the Lat-PAC group than the Sep-PAC or control groups. Collagen 8 was also more abundant in the Lat-PAC than the control group (P=0.05), whereas no differences were observed in fibronectin or periostin proteins. LOX, an essential protein involved in crosslinking and stabilization of collagen,8 was more abundant in the Lat-PAC group than the control group (P=0.05). TGF-β signaling–related proteins were also higher in the Lat-PAC group, with increases in latent and active monomer TGF-β protein, as well as the intracellular second messenger of TGF-β receptor activation, phosphorylated SMAD2/SMAD3. No statistically significant differences were observed in the TGF-β receptor type 2 levels. These results suggested that TGF-β1 mediated activation of SMAD signaling, with a resultant increase in collagen and LOX proteins in the Lat-PAC group.
Figure 8. Molecular analysis. Left, Western blot of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (pink) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) signaling proteins (yellow) in the control, septal premature atrial complex, and lateral left atrial premature atrial complex groups. Right, Comparison of the specific ECM (top) and TGF-β1 signaling proteins (bottom) by group.

DISCUSSION

In a swine model of paced PACs, we found that frequent PACs led to atrial dilatation and fibrosis, slowed conduction, and a longer duration of induced AF; frequent PAC exposure for 16 weeks did not change the atrial ERP, whereas rapid regular atrial pacing led to a significant decrease; mechanically dyssynchronous PACs from the lateral LA caused a greater degree of electrical and structural fibrotic remodeling than less dyssynchronous Sep-PACs at the same PAC coupling interval; and a resultant fibrotic atriopathy is driven by upregulation and activation of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway (Graphical Abstract in the Supplemental Material). This suggests that frequent PACs can cause fibrotic atrial structural remodeling that leads to a milieu supporting AF.
PACs have been considered to be largely benign. However, recent population-based cohort studies demonstrated an association between frequent PACs and ischemic strokes or incident AF.4,5,9–12 This relationship appears to be apparent at a PAC burden substantially lower than the 50% used in our study: as low as >100 PACs per day13 or even the presence of PACs on a single ECG.5 Studying the natural history of humans with frequent PACs is difficult because AF may not develop for decades. Moreover, numerous factors, such as structural heart disease, hypertension, or obesity, may serve as contributors to development of malignant atrial substrate, which makes it difficult to evaluate the pure effect of PACs.2,3 Therefore, our findings in a swine model provide novel insight into those studies revealing that PACs themselves, without other comorbidities, can lead to progressive structural remodeling and AF. Furthermore, the described fibrotic atrial remodeling attributable to PACs may play an important role in the progression from early paroxysmal AF to persistent AF.
The LA remodeling secondary to our chronic PAC model was best characterized by development of a fibrotic atrial substrate. LA fibrosis, which alters atrial tissue composition and function, is known as a key determinant of the AF substrate.14,15 Previous case–control studies demonstrated an increased extracellular matrix deposition in patients with lone AF or AF secondary to mitral valve disease.14,15 A recent human study demonstrated that extracellular matrix gene expression precedes the onset of AF.16 In our chronic PAC model, we demonstrated increased fibrosis on histology as well as significant upregulation of collagen and other extracellular matrix proteins, mediated by TGF-β1 activation of the SMAD (phosphorylated SMAD 2/3) intracellular signalling pathway to stimulate collagen (Col1 and Col8) and extracellular matrix proteins (LOX) by cardiac fibroblasts.17–20
Another interesting observation in our PAC model was that there was no change in atrial ERP, even after 16 weeks of PAC exposure. This suggests the mechanism of atrial remodeling attributable to PACs differs from previous atrial tachy-pacing models, in which the dominant effect on atrial remodeling was attributable to shortening of atrial ERP.21–23 Our regular rapid atrial pacing animals had a significant shortening of atrial ERP, consistent with the findings of previous tachy-pacing models. On the other hand, models in which the AF substrate was induced by congestive heart failure,24 obstructive sleep apnea,25 or hypertension26 are more similar to our chronic PAC model, all of which demonstrate structural remodeling with similar electrophysiologic (slowed/heterogeneous conduction), histological (increased fibrosis), and molecular (increased TGF-β1 signaling) fingerprints.
Previous human experiments suggested less acute AF induction with coronary sinus compared with high right atrial PACs,27 but our model is different in several respects. First, we examined the effect of chronic PACs on left atrial remodeling at AF induction. Second, we only used the coronary sinus in swine to access the vein of Marshall, which is large in swine and allows pacing from the base of the left atrial appendage (to avoid the complexity of transeptal puncture and chronic left atrial lead placement with its attendant stroke risk, as illustrated in Figure 1). This positioning is substantially different from pacing in the proximal or distal coronary sinus in humans.
The coupling interval in this PAC model was chosen to be shorter than the atrioventricular–nodal ERP and negate the effect of a rapid or irregular ventricular rate. One can speculate that the effect of atrial contractions during the PACs against a closed mitral valve may also have affected the remodeling. However, when measuring the LA pressure during nonconducted and conducted PACs, the magnitude of the PAC-a wave generated by the PAC atrial contraction was paradoxically much smaller during nonconducted than conducted PACs. The lower pressure during short-coupled, nonconducted PACs, compared with longer coupled, conducted PACs, may be attributable to the limited time for atrial filling. When the LA is relatively empty, whether the mitral valve is open or closed does not seem to affect the acute pressure overload of a nonconducted PAC. Therefore, this short coupling interval PAC model seems to differ from the mitral valve stenosis model, where the atrium contracts at a time with a high filling pressure.

Clinical Implications

This study supports the notion that frequent PACs, particularly dyssynchronous ones arising from the lateral LA, are not simply an epiphenomenon, but may directly cause atrial myopathy and contribute to AF pathogenesis. This supports the notion that frequent PACs themselves, in the absence of AF, may contribute to atrial myopathy and predispose to stroke.9–12 Whereas the appropriate management strategy remains unproven, further studies will determine whether early PAC suppression or anticoagulation may prevent the development of adverse atrial remodeling and AF as well as reduce the risk of stroke. These data also suggest that PAC frequency is not sufficient as a predictor, but that the PAC location also may be critical to determining future AF risk.

Limitations

The use of a swine model has inherent limitations because of differences in physiology compared with humans. However, this model enables a prospective assessment of the direct effects of high-burden PACs over a 16-week period under controlled conditions, which would be impossible in humans. Whereas a 50% PAC burden is uncommonly seen in clinical practice, this model allowed us to test whether PACs would lead to atrial remodeling over a realistic 16-week time period. The control animals were not instrumented (to contain costs, preserve pacemakers or leads, and minimize the number of invasive procedures). However, it is possible the presence of an atrial lead alone could affect atrial remodeling. We observed significant differences between the 2 PAC groups, suggesting that other factors (other than mitral valve closure) affect the relative effects of PACs on remodeling. Further studies are required to characterize the PAC burden and duration required in humans for the development of atrial myopathy.

Conclusions

In a swine model, high-burden PACs for 16 weeks resulted in an atrial myopathy and remodeling characterized by slow conduction and fibrosis development with a heightened propensity for AF. PACs led to a fibrotic atrial substrate without any change in the atrial ERP, suggesting a process distinct from tachy-pacing–induced atrial remodeling. Lateral LA PACs appear to be associated with a greater degree of atrial myopathy and remodeling and longer duration of induced AF than septal PACs. These data provide evidence that frequent PACs are not an epiphenomenon of AF and can cause an atrial substrate supporting AF. Whether early suppression of specific dyssynchronous PACs can prevent future AF or strokes requires further study.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Supplemental Material

Figures S1–S12
Table S1
Graphical Abstract

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of California, San Francisco laboratory animal resource center staff for expert animal handling and assistance during these studies.

Footnote

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

AF
atrial fibrillation
EF
ejection fraction
ERP
effective refractory period
IQR
interquartile range
LA
left atrium
Lat-PAC
paced premature ventricular complexes from the lateral left atrium by the coronary sinus
LOX
lysyl oxidase
LV
left ventricular
PAC
premature atrial complex
PVC
premature ventricular complex
RA
right atrium
RAA
right atrial appendage
Reg-130
regular atrial pacing at a faster mean atrial rate than during premature ventricular complexes
Sep-PAC
paced premature ventricular complexes from the interatrial septum
TGF
transforming growth factor
TTE
transthoracic echocardiography

Supplemental Material

File (circ_circulationaha-2023-065874_supp1.pdf)

REFERENCES

1.
Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Métayer P, Clémenty J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659–666. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003
2.
Michaud GF, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:353–361. doi: 10.1056/nejmcp2023658
3.
Staerk L, Sherer JA, Ko D, Benjamin EJ, Helm RH. Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical outcomes. Circ Res. 2017;120:1501–1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732
4.
Dewland TA, Vittinghoff E, Mandyam MC, Heckbert SR, Siscovick DS, Stein PK, Psaty BM, Sotoodehnia N, Gottdiener JS, Marcus GM. Atrial ectopy as a predictor of incident atrial fibrillation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:721–728. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-11-201312030-00004
5.
Murakoshi N, Xu D, Sairenchi T, Igarashi M, Irie F, Tomizawa T, Tada H, Sekiguchi Y, Yamagishi K, Iso H, et al. Prognostic impact of supraventricular premature complexes in community-based health checkups: the Ibaraki Prefectural Health Study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:170–178. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu407
6.
Huizar JF, Ellenbogen KA, Tan AY, Kaszala K. Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2328–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.045
7.
Walters TE, Rahmutula D, Szilagyi J, Alhede C, Sievers R, Fang Q, Olgin J, Gerstenfeld EP. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts the cardiomyopathy associated with premature ventricular contractions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(23 Pt A):2870–2882. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.059
8.
Rodríguez C, Martínez-González J. The role of lysyl oxidase enzymes in cardiac function and remodeling. Cells. 2019;8:1483. doi: 10.3390/cells8121483
9.
Larsen BS, Kumarathurai P, Falkenberg J, Nielsen OW, Sajadieh A. Excessive atrial ectopy and short atrial runs increase the risk of stroke beyond incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:232–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.018
10.
Sajeev JK, Koshy AN, Dewey H, Kalman JM, Rajakariar K, Tan MC, Street M, Roberts L, Cooke JC, Wong M, et al. Association between excessive premature atrial complexes and cryptogenic stroke: results of a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e029164. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029164
11.
Binici Z, Intzilakis T, Nielsen OW, Køber L, Sajadieh A. Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity and increased risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke. Circulation. 2010;121:1904–1911. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.874982
12.
Meng L, Tsiaousis G, He J, Tse G, Antoniadis AP, Korantzopoulos P, Letsas KP, Baranchuk A, Qi W, Zhang Z, et al. Excessive supraventricular ectopic activity and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22:14. doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-0832-4
13.
Acharya T, Tringali S, Bhullar M, Nalbandyan M, Ilineni VK, Carbajal E, Deedwania P. Frequent atrial premature complexes and their association with risk of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1852–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.09.025
14.
Frustaci A, Chimenti C, Bellocci F, Morgante E, Russo MA, Maseri A. Histological substrate of atrial biopsies in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1997;96:1180–1184. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.4.1180
15.
Boldt A, Wetzel U, Lauschke J, Weigl J, Gummert J, Hindricks G, Kottkamp H, Dhein S. Fibrosis in left atrial tissue of patients with atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease. Heart. 2004;90:400–405. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.015347
16.
van den Berg NWE, Neefs J, Kawasaki M, Nariswari FA, Wesselink R, Fabrizi B, Jongejan A, Klaver MN, Havenaar H, Hulsman EL, et al; PREDICT-AF Investigators. Extracellular matrix remodeling precedes atrial fibrillation: results of the PREDICT-AF trial. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18:2115–2125. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.059
17.
Burstein B, Nattel S. Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:802–809. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.064
18.
Hunter RJ, Liu Y, Lu Y, Wang W, Schilling RJ. Left atrial wall stress distribution and its relationship to electrophysiologic remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:351–360. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965541
19.
Hao J, Wang B, Jones SC, Jassal DS, Dixon IM. Interaction between angiotensin II and Smad proteins in fibroblasts in failing heart and in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H3020–H3030. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.6.H3020
20.
Evans RA, Tian YC, Steadman R, Phillips AO. TGF-beta1-mediated fibroblast-myofibroblast terminal differentiation-the role of Smad proteins. Exp Cell Res. 2003;282:90–100. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00015-0
21.
Morillo CA, Klein GJ, Jones DL, Guiraudon CM. Chronic rapid atrial pacing: structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1995;91:1588–1595. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.5.1588
22.
Goette A, Honeycutt C, Langberg JJ. Electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation: time course and mechanisms. Circulation. 1996;94:2968–2974. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2968
23.
Gaspo R, Bosch RF, Talajic M, Nattel S. Functional mechanisms underlying tachycardia-induced sustained atrial fibrillation in a chronic dog model. Circulation. 1997;96:4027–4035. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.11.4027
24.
Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, Nattel S. Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999;100:87–95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.1.87
25.
Iwasaki YK, Kato T, Xiong F, Shi YF, Naud P, Maguy A, Mizuno K, Tardif JC, Comtois P, Nattel S. Atrial fibrillation promotion with long-term repetitive obstructive sleep apnea in a rat model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2013–2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.077
26.
Kim SJ, Choisy SC, Barman P, Zhang H, Hancox JC, Jones SA, James AF. Atrial remodeling and the substrate for atrial fibrillation in rat hearts with elevated afterload. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:761–769. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.964783
27.
Papageorgiou P, Monahan K, Boyle NG, Seifert MJ, Beswick P, Zebede J, Epstein LM, Josephson ME. Site-dependent intra-atrial conduction delay: relationship to initiation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1996;94:384–389. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.384

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation
Go to Circulation
Circulation
Pages: 463 - 474
PubMed: 37994608

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 10 June 2023
Accepted: 26 October 2023
Published online: 23 November 2023
Published in print: 6 February 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. atrial fibrillation
  2. atrial premature contractions
  3. atrial remodeling

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Satoshi Higuchi, MD
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Aleksandr Voskoboinik, MBBS, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-302X
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Sung Il Im, MD
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Ayla Arbil, BS
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Junaid Afzal, MBBS, MS
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Gregory M. Marcus, MD, MAS https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5197-7696
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Carol Stillson, BS
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Dwight Bibby, RDCS
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Theodore Abraham, MD
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco.

Notes

Supplemental Material is available at Supplemental Material.
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 473.
Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circ
Correspondence to: Edward P. Gerstenfeld, MD, MS, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, 500 Parnassus Ave, MU-East 4th Floor, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. Email [email protected]

Disclosures

Disclosures Pacemakers and leads used in the study were donated by Medtronic, Inc. The authors report no disclosures.

Sources of Funding

Dr Higuchi was supported by Uehara Memorial Foundation Fellowship and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Fellowship. Dr Voskoboinik was supported by a Heart Rhythm Society Research Fellowship and National Heart Foundation of Australia Early Career Fellowship. The study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01HL159069 to Dr Gerstenfeld.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Shorter Premature Atrial Complex Coupling Interval Leads to Mechanical Dysfunction, Fibrosis, and AF in Swine, JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.005
    Crossref
  2. Premature contraction with a widespread breakthrough on the left atrial anterior wall: Where is the origin?, HeartRhythm Case Reports, 10, 10, (714-716), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.07.005
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Frequent Premature Atrial Contractions Lead to Adverse Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation in a Swine Model
Circulation
  • Vol. 149
  • No. 6

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation
  • Vol. 149
  • No. 6
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response