Skip to main content
This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Despite advances in medical and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), individuals with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) have persistent symptoms, including exercise intolerance. Optimizing cardio-locomotor coupling may increase stroke volume and skeletal muscle perfusion as previously shown in healthy runners. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that exercise stroke volume and cardiac output would be higher during fixed-paced walking when steps were synchronized with the diastolic compared with systolic portion of the cardiac cycle in patients with CHF and CRT.

METHODS:

Ten participants (58±17 years of age; 40% female) with CHF and previously implanted CRT pacemakers completed 5-minute bouts of walking on a treadmill (range, 1.5–3 mph). Participants were randomly assigned to first walking to an auditory tone to synchronize their foot strike to either the systolic (0% or 100±15% of the R-R interval) or diastolic phase (45±15% of the R-R interval) of their cardiac cycle and underwent assessments of oxygen uptake (V̇o2; indirect calorimetry) and cardiac output (acetylene rebreathing). Data were compared through paired-samples t tests.

RESULTS:

o2 was similar between conditions (diastolic 1.02±0.44 versus systolic 1.05±0.42 L/min; P=0.299). Compared with systolic walking, stroke volume (diastolic 80±28 versus systolic 74±26 mL; P=0.003) and cardiac output (8.3±3.5 versus 7.9±3.4 L/min; P=0.004) were higher during diastolic walking; heart rate (paced) was not different between conditions. Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower during diastolic walking (85±12 versus 98±20 mm Hg; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with CHF who have received CRT, diastolic stepping increases stroke volume and oxygen delivery and decreases afterload. We speculate that, if added to pacemakers, this cardio-locomotor coupling technology may maximize CRT efficiency and increase exercise participation and quality of life in patients with CHF.

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

During fixed-paced walking in patients with chronic congestive heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy, stroke volume and cardiac output were higher, and blood pressure and total peripheral resistance were lower, when steps were synchronized with the diastolic compared with systolic portion of the cardiac cycle.
Fine-tuning cardio-locomotor coupling offers significant positive hemodynamic effects in patients with congestive heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Automated synchronization of steps with the diastolic portion of the cardiac cycle (diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling) within pacemakers represents a potential novel intervention to increase exercise tolerance, exercise capacity, and, therefore, patient quality of life.
Editorial, see p 2017
Despite the establishment of standard guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure, it remains a morbid and mortal disease that affects 6.0 million Americans >20 years of age.1 Current prevalence estimates suggest that congestive heart failure (CHF) diagnosis will increase to >8 million adults by 2030,2,3 costing the United States an estimated $53.1 billion each year.3 In addition, CHF is associated with marked reductions in quality of life and a high mortality rate (≈75% at 5 years)4 and thus requires the development of novel therapeutic interventions.4,5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)6,7 is recommended for select patients with CHF, left bundle-branch block, and a prolonged QRS interval, as CRT reduces mortality, CHF symptoms, and CHF hospitalizations in randomized controlled trials.8–10 Although exercise training is known to be effective for patients with CHF,11 the benefits have been modest, with limited improvements in cardiac performance.12,13 Even after implantation of CRT and associated moderate improvements in 6-minute walking distance,14 patients with CHF often still have limited exercise capacity related to dyspnea and fatigue.15 The mechanisms underlying this impaired functional capacity include both central cardiac limitations, which impair stroke volume and cardiac output reserve, as well as peripheral limitations impairing muscle oxygen delivery and utilization.11 Thus, strategies to improve functional capacity in patients with CHF are sorely needed, and a method to augment the response to exercise would be a meaningful advance in the rehabilitation and quality of life of such patients.
One possible strategy that could achieve this objective is to enhance left ventricular performance by synchronizing ventricular contraction with the pressure waves generated by foot strike, termed “cardio-locomotor coupling.”16–19 We previously showed that, in healthy athletes, synchronizing foot strike to the diastolic portion of the cardiac cycle resulted in a significantly lower heart rate and higher oxygen pulse compared with the systolic portion.20 In contrast to healthy runners, patients with CHF are particularly sensitive to afterload, and this fundamental pathophysiology21 underpins the cornerstone therapy for heart failure22,23; thus, any intervention that lowers afterload could be especially effective in these patients. Moreover, patients with heart failure tend to have a slow, short-stepping gait that may predispose them to impaired cardio-locomotor coupling, metabolic inefficiency, and impaired exercise tolerance.24,25 Therefore, optimizing cardio-locomotor coupling may be a novel target to improve functional capacity in these patients.
With this background in mind, we determined the effects of synchronizing foot strike with cardiac phase on exercise hemodynamics and performance in patients with CHF and CRT. We specifically tested the hypothesis that, at the same treadmill walking speed, exercise stroke volume and cardiac output would be augmented when foot strike occurs during cardiac diastole compared with when foot strike occurs during systole in patients with CHF and CRT. Our hypothesis is based on the previous observation that oxygen pulse, an index of stroke volume,26 is higher during diastolic compared with systolic running in healthy adults.

METHODS

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Study Design and Participants

Twenty individuals with compensated CHF, who had already undergone CRT for an accepted clinical indication, receiving stable medical therapy for at least 3 months, participated in this study; notably, only 10 participants were included in final analysis after completion of the study protocol (Table 1). Participants were excluded from enrollment if they presented with decompensated heart failure (New York Heart Association class IIIb or IV), hearing loss, unmanageable joint pain, uncontrolled infectious disease, dependent state of inotropes, current smoker, pulmonary disease (eg, idiopathic pulmonary hypertension), other cardiovascular diseases (eg, valve or adult congenital heart disease), musculoskeletal disease, or other existing health conditions that precluded participation in physical activity. Participants were also excluded during screening if they were unable to synchronize their foot strike with an auditory tone representing cardiac cycle phase. During screening, we also performed echocardiography (Philips Epiq 7) during supine rest to characterize left ventricular ejection fraction at the time of study; one participant’s images were not analyzable; thus, echocardiography data are reported from 9 participants. After study completion, 10 individuals were excluded from data analysis, as they were not able to complete at least one pair of systolic-diastolic stepping with a minimum of 50% synchronization for each respective cardiac cycle phase. Participant characteristics are detailed in Table 2. Testing was performed at the Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine in Dallas, TX. All participants provided written informed consent, and study approval was granted by the institutional review board of the University of Texas Southwestern (STU-2018-0262).
Table 1. Study Protocol.
ConditionFree walkingDiastolic walkingSystolic walkingDiastolic walkingSystolic walking
Pair No. 1122
% R-R intervalSilent45±150/100 ± 1545±150/100±15
Time (min)55555
Table 2. Participant Characteristics
Variablen=10
Anthropometrics 
 Height, cm171.5±11.1
 Body mass, kg91.3±36.7
 Body surface area, m22.1±0.5
Supine cardiac structure and function (n=9) 
 Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mL173±74
 Left ventricular end-systolic volume, mL112±59
 Left ventricular stroke volume, mL61±22
Medical history, n (%) 
 Hypertension2 (20)
 Type 2 diabetes1 (10)
 Atrial fibrillation3 (30)
 Coronary artery disease1 (10)
 Percutaneous coronary investigation/coronary artery bypass graft1 (10)
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1 (10)
Medications, n (%) 
 Beta-blocker10 (100)
 Calcium channel blocker1 (10)
 Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockade8 (80)
 Loop diuretic7 (70)
 Thiazide diuretic0 (0)
 Aldosterone antagonist8 (80)
 Sodium glucose transporter inhibitor5 (50)
 Glucagon like peptide-10 (0)
Data are presented as mean±SD or n.

Study Protocol

All participants attended the laboratory on a maximum of 2 occasions to complete screening and testing. After consent, participants were familiarized with walking on a treadmill (Biodex RTM 600) to determine an individualized, appropriate, and comfortable walking speed (equating to ≈30–40% of their maximal oxygen uptake). Walking speed ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 mph at 0% to 4% incline, and all participants completed 3 to 5 bouts of walking for 5 minutes during the study day, with the aim of completing at least one pair of systolic-diastolic stepping. Walking was completed during one control-free walking condition, without any foot strike timing guidance to further familiarize participants with the measurements during exercise and 2 experimental conditions: (1) systolic walking, defined as stepping at 0% or 100±15% of the R-R interval; and (2) diastolic walking, defined as stepping at 45±15% of the R-R interval (Table 1). Free walking was always completed first; the order of systolic-diastolic walking was randomized, and the participants were blinded to the targeted cardiac phase. During these sessions, heart rate and step frequencies, gas exchange, and cardiac output were measured. Heart rate and rhythm were monitored through a 5-lead ECG. Each participant completed all walking at the same speed for all conditions.

Foot Strike Timing Procedure

All participants wore a chest strap (Zephyr Bioharness, Annapolis, MD) with an attached sensor to detect heart rate (through ECG) and foot strike (through accelerometry). Data were transmitted wirelessly in real time to a tablet (Apple Inc. iPad, Cupertino, CA) running proprietary analysis software (Counterpace; Pulson, Mountain View, CA). Counterpace produced auditory tones corresponding to occur exactly on the R wave of the ECG (ie, ventricular systole) or at 45% of the R-R interval (ie, diastole). Tones were projected to the participant over a loudspeaker.
Valid step counts (%) were determined using Counterpace. The software generated step and R-wave time stamps on the raw quantitative data to assist in calculating the relative phase of each walking bout: %RRI (percentage of R-R interval)=100(tsteptR-wave1)/(tR-wave2tR-wave1), where tR-wave1 and tR-wave2 refer to the time point of 2 consecutive R waves, and tstep indicates the time point that a step occurred between the 2 R waves. The number of steps that fell in phase (100±15% of the R-wave for systolic walking and 45±15% of the R-R interval for diastolic walking) over the total steps taken was used to calculate the percentage of valid steps. Valid steps were examined in the last minute of each walking bout during which data collection occurred. Bouts that had <50% of valid or “in-phase” steps were excluded. For participants who walked with an uneven gait or had more complex ECG morphology, we completed post hoc analysis of foot strike waveforms collected through pressure sensors (BIOPAC Systems Inc., Goleta, CA) applied to the bottoms of participants’ shoes (n=5). ECG and the foot sensor waveforms were collected in real time through data acquisition software (BIOPAC Systems Inc., Goleta, CA). Heel strike (Figure 1) was marked and used to calculate the foot strike time in relation to the ECG. Foot strike timing was calculated as detailed above to assess valid step timing, expressed as a percentage of the R-R interval.
Figure 1. Example of systolic and diastolic walking using foot strike sensors.

Cardiopulmonary Parameters

During standing rest and the latter 2.5 minutes of each walking bout, participants breathed through a mouthpiece attached to a 4-way valve. We measured ventilation (Vacumed, Ventura, CA) and fractional gas concentrations (mass spectrometry, MGA01100 Marquette Gas Analysis, Missouri), and calculated oxygen uptake through indirect calorimetry (Beck Integrative Physiological System; KCBeck). All gas exchange variables were calculated from 3 minutes of rest or 45 to 60 seconds during the last minute of each 5-minute walking bout. Cardiac output was assessed using acetylene rebreathing,27,28 which involved participants inhaling a mixture of inert gases, including 9% helium, 0.6% acetylene, 45% oxygen, and balanced nitrogen, and rebreathing the same volume for 6 to 8 breaths. Stroke volume was calculated as the quotient of cardiac output and heart rate. During the rebreathing maneuvers, brachial blood pressure was monitored using an electrosphygmomanometer (Suntech Tango M2; Morrisville, NC). We calculated effective arterial elastance (systolic blood pressure×0.9/stroke volume) as an index of arterial resistive, not pulsatile, afterload.29 Blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography; BMEYE, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and pulse oxygen saturation (Nellcor N600x, Pleasanton, CA) were continuously monitored throughout rest and exercise; reported blood pressures are from the electrosphygmomanometer.

Statistical Analysis

After testing for normality (Shapiro-Wilk), we addressed our a priori primary aim by comparing diastolic and systolic walking using paired-samples t tests. Free walking data are shown for reference only and were not compared with the experimental conditions due to the participants’ highly variable gait patterns and consequential irregular step-timing. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean±SD, and all analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism (Version 9.5.0).

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Ten participants with CHF and previously implanted CRT pacemakers were included for analysis (Table 2). Our participants were 58±17 (range, 23–75) years of age, 40% of whom were female, and 90% were White. Average body mass index was 30.3±9.4 kg/m2. At the time of study, left ventricular ejection fraction was 37±10% (n=9).

Diastolic Versus Systolic Walking

There was no difference between the percentage of valid footsteps during diastolic or systolic walking (diastolic 65±12% versus systolic 62±11%; P=0.556). Hemodynamic and cardiopulmonary data are displayed in Table 3. Oxygen uptake was similar between diastolic and systolic walking (P=0.298). Likewise, heart rate (paced) was not different between conditions (P=0.300). Compared with systolic walking, stroke volume, and cardiac output (P=0.003 and P=0.004, respectively; Figure 2B and 2C) were higher during diastolic walking. Mean arterial pressure (n=9; P=0.007; Figure 2D), total peripheral resistance (n=9; P=0.008; Figure 2E) and diastolic blood pressure (n=9; P=0.005; Table 3) were also lower during diastolic walking than during systolic walking; respiratory exchange ratio was moderately lower during diastolic walking (P=0.075). Systolic blood pressure, effective arterial elastance, and minute ventilation were not different between systolic and diastolic walking (Table 3).
Table 3. Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Parameters During Exercise
VariableRestFree walkingDiastolic walkingSystolic walkingP value
(diastolic vs systolic)
Hemodynamics
 Heart rate, bpm72±995±13101±15103±140.300
 Stroke volume, mL50±1379± 480±2874±260.003
 Stroke volume reserve, % (range)59±30
(23 to 121)
63±41
(–4 to 121)
50±37
(0 to 113)
0.002
 Cardiac output, L/min3.6±1.17.6±2.88.3±3.57.9±3.40.004
 Total peripheral resistance, mm Hg·L–1·min–1*24.8±7.413.7±4.811.8±4.814.5±6.70.008
 Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg*113±21144±28134±16142±350.265
 Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg*68±971±1960±1276±180.005
 Mean arterial pressure, mm Hg*83±1096±2085±1298±200.007
 Effective arterial elastance, mm Hg×mL*2.1±0.61.8±0.51.9±0.51.9±0.80.623
Ventilatory
 Oxygen uptake, L/min0.29±0.100.99±0.381.0 ±0.441.0 ±0.420.299
 Minute ventilation, L/min12.9±3.030.7±7.032.6±9.834.4±10.20.128
 Respiratory exchange ratio, au0.80±0.090.84±0.070.84±0.060.87±0.070.075
 a-Vo2 difference, %8.2±1.713.3±2.912.7±3.214.1± .60.004
Treadmill speed and grade
 Speed, mph2.2±0.52.2±0.52.2±0.5
 Grade, %
  0, n777
  1, n
  2, n111
  3, n111
  4, n111
Data are presented as mean±SD. Data were compared through paired-samples t tests.
*
Data reported on n=9.
Statistically significant (P<0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of synchronization of foot strike timing with cardiac phase on exercise hemodynamics. Heart rate (paced; A) was not different between systolic and diastolic walking. Stroke volume (B) and cardiac output (C) were higher during diastolic walking than during systolic walking; whereas mean arterial pressure (D) and total peripheral resistance (E) were lower during diastolic walking. Data were compared through paired-samples t tests; P values in bold are considered statistically significant (P<0.05).

DISCUSSION

The primary findings from this study are that stroke volume and cardiac output are higher during diastolic than during systolic walking in patients with CHF who have undergone CRT. The higher cardiac output occurs with no difference in heart rate (because patients are paced) or metabolic work between conditions, but a lower mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance. Our study suggests that diastolic walking is of hemodynamic benefit in patients with CHF, and diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling may represent a novel strategy to augment the effectiveness of CRT in patients with CHF.

Novel Strategy to Augment the Effectiveness of CRT

During whole-body exercise, the skeletal muscle pump (venous return) and cardiac ejection (ie, stroke volume) work to ensure continuous blood flow to skeletal muscle.30 For many years, it has been suggested that the synchronization of skeletal muscle and cardiac contraction may increase cardiovascular efficiency.31,32 The strategy for synchronizing skeletal muscle and cardiac contraction (cardio-locomotor coupling) is uniquely possible when running or walking, as heart rate and step rate are typically similar at any pace. Indeed, heel strike during running (or walking) can produce a backward returning wave in the circulation that can either increase arterial impedance, if it occurs during systole, or facilitate coronary and skeletal muscle perfusion, if it occurs during diastole.18 Thus, cardiac output and muscle blood flow are maximized for a given level of exercise when skeletal muscle and cardiac contractions are timed in inverse synchrony.18,33,34 In line with this theory, we previously showed that synchronizing foot strike to the diastolic portion of the cardiac cycle when running at one predetermined speed resulted in a significantly lower heart rate and higher oxygen pulse compared with the systolic portion.35 Herein, we set to extend these findings to patients with stable CHF during walking by using acetylene rebreathing to assess cardiac output and determine stroke volume, as oxygen pulse can be used as an index of stroke volume in healthy adults26 but not in adults with heart failure.36
We observed that stroke volume and cardiac output were higher and mean arterial pressure was lower during diastolic stepping, which suggests that diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling represents a novel approach to augment oxygen delivery during exercise in patients with CHF. Therefore, our current study extends our previous report on athletes who reported a higher oxygen pulse when foot strike occurred during diastole while running.20 The higher exercise cardiac output during diastolic walking occurred despite no difference in heart rate, which we found to be lower in athletes20; the lack of difference in heart rate, despite the higher stroke volume, likely occurred because the individuals tested here had CRT pacemakers.
CRT6,7 is well known to affect increases in exercise capacity14,37 and quality of life and to reduce symptoms in those with CHF.8–10 Therefore, if built into CRT pacemakers, diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling could further improve exercise capacity and reduce fatigue due to increased oxygen delivery. Including this technology in pacemakers would specifically require reverse engineering the concept used in the current study, and, instead of using the accelerometer to send an auditory tone for individuals to step to, it would be used to guide pacing at a time after the waveform crosses >1× the force of gravity (ie, between steps; Figure 3). Taken together, inducing increases in stroke volume, and thereby oxygen delivery, is likely advantageous for patients with CHF regarding augmenting exercise tolerance. Future studies are required to assess whether diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling is effective in increasing time to fatigue in patients with CHF, thus representing a novel strategy to increase physical activity levels and exercise tolerance in these patients.
Figure 3. Hypothesis related to the hemodynamic effects of systolic and diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling. This hypothesis figure represents the hemodynamic effects of synchronizing foot strike with either systole or diastole. However, to be used within cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers, the accelerometer within the pacemaker is essential because it would be used to initiate cardiac contraction. Specifically, A change of –1G from the peak of the accelerometer signal at heel strike can represent the double-contact phase of the gait cycle and be used to time cardiac contraction. Note: The dashed lines represent a normal arterial pressure waveform, and the bold lines represent added pressure elicited during systolic or diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling. BP indicates blood pressure; and 1G, 1× the force of gravity.

Mechanism of Action: Preload Versus Afterload?

It was not possible to obtain assessments of preload (ventricular filling pressure or end-diastolic volume) during this study; however, despite the lack of difference in effective arterial elastance, mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance were markedly lower during diastolic walking than during systolic walking. The lower pressure and resistance would suggest that a lower afterload facilitates a higher stroke volume during diastolic stepping. It is notable that our data support the previous suggestions of improved cardiovascular efficiency31,32 and cardiac output and muscle blood flow18,33,34 when skeletal muscle and cardiac contractions are timed in inverse synchrony. The effects of this synchronization are likely mediated by the production of a backward returning wave in the circulation that facilitates coronary perfusion, thereby increasing skeletal muscle perfusion in the subsequent cardiac cycle.18 Arterial pulse wave reflections and their consequent effect on ventricular-arterial coupling are now recognized as critical contributors to both systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with CHF38 and are considered a risk factor for the development of heart failure in the general population.39 The effects of exercise, especially in clinical groups, on these pressure-flow relationships remain unclear, but our study may indeed highlight their importance during exercise.

Clinical Implications

Cardiorespiratory fitness has been recommended to be considered a vital sign,40 and exercise intolerance is a primary symptom of patients with CHF. Therefore, novel strategies to improve exercise tolerance in these patients are warranted. We show that by using simple technology, which is already built into current CRT pacemakers (tri-axial accelerometer and cardiac rhythm monitor), it is possible to exert significant increases in cardiac output during exercise at the same walking speed when stepping in diastole. Future studies are required to determine the effectiveness of such technology when developed within a CRT pacemaker on patients’ physical activity levels, exercise capacity (ie, time to onset of fatigue), and sensations of fatigue. Furthermore, future studies could assess the effects of alternative coupling ratios (1 step to 2 heart beats) and respiratory-locomotor coupling. Nevertheless, using diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling to boost exercise cardiac output represents a novel intervention that can be incorporated within current CRT devices to increase exercise capacity and patient quality of life and avoid the detriments of systolic walking.

Study Limitations

Several methodological considerations are worthy of discussion. First, this is a small pilot study with usable data in 50% of the individuals consented. Future studies are required to confirm these findings in a larger sample to provide more data regarding the potential benefit of fine-tuning cardio-locomotor coupling in heart failure. Second, synchronization of foot strike timing and cardiac contraction was conducted by having participants step to an audible tone, making our results dependent on a participant’s ability to “step in time.” Related to this issue, we selected the criterion of ≥50% synchronization of foot strike and cardiac cycle phase. It is notable that there were still effects of diastolic stepping, and, if this technology is applied within CRT devices, the synchronization will be automated (participant-independent), providing continuous diastolic stepping that could lead to greater effectiveness. Third, we used 2 methods of assessing foot strike timing due to the 2 different methods of data collection. We used either the raw data output from the Counterpace software or conducted manual analysis of the foot strike waveforms (Figure 1); in individuals with a regular gait pattern, these methods provided similar values of foot strike timing (<5% difference in valid step percentage). Finally, due to the severity of exercise intolerance in those studied here, we were unable to collect reliable data at a higher exercise intensity (ie, fast walking); the appropriate synchronization of foot strike and cardiac cycle phase was much more intermittent, and despite our best attempts, we were unable to coach the participants to complete exercise at faster speeds. Nevertheless, our study had several strengths, especially regarding the reliable measurement of exercise cardiac output through acetylene rebreathing27,28 and a counterbalanced order of systolic and diastolic walking to offset any order effects.

Conclusions

Timing foot strike when walking to the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle in patients with CHF achieved a higher stroke volume and cardiac output, as well as a lower mean arterial pressure and total peripheral resistance. The hemodynamic effects of diastolic walking are of benefit in terms of increasing exercise stroke volume, and future studies are required to confirm these findings and then to assess the clinical effects of this technology if built into CRT pacemakers. In patients with CHF, diastolic cardio-locomotor coupling may represent a novel strategy to augment the effectiveness of CRT on exercise tolerance (ie, time to fatigue), as well exercise capacity, together increasing patient quality of life.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participants for their participation and for the study support from Pulson Inc in providing their software.

Footnote

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

CHF
congestive heart failure
CRT
cardiac resynchronization therapy

REFERENCES

1.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Cheng S, Delling FN, et al; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
2.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:e147–e239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019
3.
Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, Bluemke DA, Butler J, Fonarow GC, Ikonomidis JS, Khavjou O, Konstam MA, Maddox TM, et al; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:606–619. doi: 10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a
4.
Shah KS, Xu H, Matsouaka RA, Bhatt DL, Heidenreich PA, Hernandez AF, Devore AD, Yancy CW, Fonarow GC. Heart failure with preserved, borderline, and reduced ejection fraction: 5-year outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2476–2486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.074
5.
Pellicori P, Khan MJI, Graham FJ, Cleland JGF. New perspectives and future directions in the treatment of heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2020;25:147–159. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09829-7
6.
Abraham WT, Hayes DL. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure. Circulation. 2003;108:2596–2603. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000096580.26969.9A
7.
Schiavone M, Arosio R, Valenza S, Ruggiero D, Mitacchione G, Lombardi L, Viecca M, Forleo GB. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023;25:C227–C233. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad046
8.
Abraham WT, Young JB, Leon AR, Adler S, Bank AJ, Hall SA, Lieberman R, Liem LB, O’Connell JB, Schroeder JS, et al; Multicenter InSync ICD II Study Group. Effects of cardiac resynchronization on disease progression in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and mildly symptomatic chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2004;110:2864–2868. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000146336.92331.D1
9.
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, et al; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–2150. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423
10.
Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L; Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–1549. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050496
11.
Fleg JL, Cooper LS, Borlaug BA, Haykowsky MJ, Kraus WE, Levine BD, Pfeffer MA, Pina IL, Poole DC, Reeves GR, et al. Exercise training as therapy for heart failure: current status and future directions. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:209–220. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.001420
12.
Flynn KE, Pina IL, Whellan DJ, Lin L, Blumenthal JA, Ellis SJ, Fine LJ, Howlett JG, Keteyian SJ, Kitzman DW, et al; HF-ACTION Investigators. Effects of exercise training on health status in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:1451–1459. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.457
13.
O’Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, Leifer ES, Kraus WE, Kitzman DW, Blumenthal JA, et al; HF-ACTION Investigators. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:1439–1450. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.454
14.
Akhtar KH, Johnston S, Zhao YD, Amil F, Ford L, Lindenfeld J, Dasari TW. Meta-analysis analyzing the effect of therapies on 6-minute walk distance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2022;178:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.05.023
15.
Kokkinos PF, Choucair W, Graves P, Papademetriou V, Ellahham S. Chronic heart failure and exercise. Am Heart J. 2000;140:21–28. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.106916
16.
Coleman WM. On the correlation of the rate of heart beat, breathing, bodily movement and sensory stimuli. J Physiol. 1920;54:213–217. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1920.sp001920
17.
Coleman WM. The psychological significance of bodily rhythms. J Comp Psychol. 1921;1:213–220. doi: 10.1037/h0067228
18.
Kirby RL, Nugent ST, Marlow RW, MacLeod DA, Marble AE. Coupling of cardiac and locomotor rhythms. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989;66:323–329. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.323
19.
O’Rourke M, Avolio A, Stelliou V, Young J, Gallagher DE. The rhythm of running: can the heart join in? Aust N Z J Med. 1993;23:708–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1993.tb04732.x
20.
Constantini K, Stickford ASL, Bleich JL, Mannheimer PD, Levine BD, Chapman RF. Synchronizing gait with cardiac cycle phase alters heart rate response during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50:1046–1053. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001515
21.
Parmley WW, Tyberg JV, Glantz SA. Cardiac dynamics. Annu Rev Physiol. 1977;39:277–299. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.39.030177.001425
22.
Mason DT. Ventricular afterload reduction in management of congestive heart failure--a rational new concept that has rapidly come of age by vasodilator drugs. Clin Cardiol. 1978;1:55–59. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960010201
23.
Mason DT. Afterload reduction and cardiac performance. Physiologic basis of systemic vasodilators as a new approach in treatment of congestive heart failure. Am J Med. 1978;65:106–125. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90700-3
24.
Davies SW, Greig CA, Jordan SL, Grieve DW, Lipkin DP. Short-stepping gait in severe heart failure. Br Heart J. 1992;68:469–472. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.11.469
25.
Hummel SL, Herald J, Alpert C, Gretebeck KA, Champoux WS, Dengel DR, Vaitkevicius PV, Alexander NB. Submaximal oxygen uptake kinetics, functional mobility, and physical activity in older adults with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016;13:450–457. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.05.004
26.
Bhambhani Y, Norris S, Bell G. Prediction of stroke volume from oxygen pulse measurements in untrained and trained men. Can J Appl Physiol. 1994;19:49–59. doi: 10.1139/h94-003
27.
Jarvis SS, Levine BD, Prisk GK, Shykoff BE, Elliott AR, Rosow E, Blomqvist CG, Pawelczyk JA. Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;103:867–874. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01106.2006
28.
Hardin EA, Stoller D, Lawley J, Howden EJ, Hieda M, Pawelczyk J, Jarvis S, Prisk K, Sarma S, Levine BD. noninvasive assessment of cardiac output: accuracy and precision of the closed-circuit acetylene rebreathing technique for cardiac output measurement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e015794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015794
29.
Chirinos JA, Rietzschel ER, Shiva-Kumar P, De Buyzere ML, Zamani P, Claessens T, Geraci S, Konda P, De Bacquer D, Akers SR, et al. Effective arterial elastance is insensitive to pulsatile arterial load. Hypertension. 2014;64:1022–1031. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03696
30.
Casey DP, Joyner MJ. Local control of skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise: influence of available oxygen. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111:1527–1538. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00895.2011
31.
Anrep GV, von Saalfeld E. The blood flow through the skeletal muscle in relation to its contraction. J Physiol. 1935;85:375–399. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003326
32.
Donville JE, Kirby RL, Doherty TJ, Gupta SK, Eastwood BJ, MacLeod DA. Effect of cardiac-locomotor coupling on the metabolic efficiency of pedalling. Can J Appl Physiol. 1993;18:379–391. doi: 10.1139/h93-032
33.
Niizeki K, Kawahara K, Miyamoto Y. Interaction among cardiac, respiratory, and locomotor rhythms during cardiolocomotor synchronization. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993;75:1815–1821. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.4.1815
34.
Nomura K, Takei Y, Yanagida Y. Comparison of cardio-locomotor synchronization during running and cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89:221–229. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0784-0
35.
Constantini K, Stickford ASL, Bleich JL, Mannheimer PD, Levine BD, Chapman RF. Synchronizing gait with cardiac cycle phase alters heart rate response during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;50:1046–1053. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001515
36.
McConnell TR, Shearn WM, Klinger TA, Strohecker K. Oxygen pulse is not predictive of stroke volume in heart failure. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006;46:286–292.
37.
Schlosshan D, Barker D, Pepper C, Williams G, Morley C, Tan LB. CRT improves the exercise capacity and functional reserve of the failing heart through enhancing the cardiac flow- and pressure-generating capacity. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:515–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.11.002
38.
Chirinos JA, Sweitzer N. Ventricular-arterial coupling in chronic heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3:12–18. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2
39.
Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR, Brumback L, Duprez DA, Kronmal R, Bluemke DA, Townsend RR, Vermeersch S, Segers P. Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2170–2177. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.054
40.
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Despres JP, Franklin BA, Haskell WL, Kaminsky LA, Levine BD, Lavie CJ, et al; American Heart Association Physical Activity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e653–e699. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000461

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation
Go to Circulation
Circulation
Pages: 2008 - 2016
PubMed: 37830218

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 29 June 2023
Accepted: 26 September 2023
Published online: 13 October 2023
Published in print: 19 December 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. cardiac resynchronization therapy
  2. exercise
  3. heart failure
  4. hemodynamics

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Sophie A. Saland, BA
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Joshua S. Lewis, BS
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Dean Palmer, MS
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Jeffery L. Bleich, MD
Pulson, Inc., Mountain View, CA (J.L.B.).
Locomotor Performance Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology & Wellness, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX (P.G.W.).
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Christopher M. Hearon Jr, PhD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Satyam Sarma, MD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.J.W., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).
Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas (D.J.W. E.I., S.A.S., J.S.L., D.P., M.M., T.L.B., C.M.H., S.S., J.P.M., M.H., B.D.L.).

Notes

*
D.J. Wakeham and E. Ivey contributed equally.
This manuscript was sent to Vera A. Bittner, Guest Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition.
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 2015.
Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circ
Correspondence to: Benjamin D. Levine, MD, Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas & The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 7232 Greenville Ave, Suite 435, Dallas, TX 75231. Email [email protected]

Disclosures

Disclosures None.

Sources of Funding

This study was funded as an investigator initiated proposal to Medtronic (ERP-2018-11361).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Evidence of spontaneous cardiac-locomotor coupling during daily activities in healthy adults, Frontiers in Physiology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1394591
    Crossref
  2. Effects of Different Exercise Intensities on the Rat Model of Heart Failure, International Heart Journal, 65, 4, (713-722), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-154
    Crossref
  3. Steps May Count for More Than Just Cardiac Risk, Circulation, 148, 25, (2017-2018), (2023)./doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067406
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Effects of Synchronizing Foot Strike and Cardiac Phase on Exercise Hemodynamics in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Within-Subjects Pilot Study to Fine-Tune Cardio-Locomotor Coupling for Heart Failure
Circulation
  • Vol. 148
  • No. 25

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation
  • Vol. 148
  • No. 25
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response