Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The Most Common Secondary Cause of Hypertension Associated With Resistant Hypertension
Abstract
Recognition and treatment of secondary causes of hypertension among patients with resistant hypertension may help to control blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular risk. However, there are no studies systematically evaluating secondary causes of hypertension according to the Seventh Joint National Committee. Consecutive patients with resistant hypertension were investigated for known causes of hypertension irrespective of symptoms and signs, including aortic coarctation, Cushing syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, drugs, pheochromocytoma, primary aldosteronism, renal parenchymal disease, renovascular hypertension, and thyroid disorders. Among 125 patients (age: 52±1 years, 43% males, systolic and diastolic blood pressure: 176±31 and 107±19 mm Hg, respectively), obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index: >15 events per hour) was the most common condition associated with resistant hypertension (64.0%), followed by primary aldosteronism (5.6%), renal artery stenosis (2.4%), renal parenchymal disease (1.6%), oral contraceptives (1.6%), and thyroid disorders (0.8%). In 34.4%, no secondary cause of hypertension was identified (primary hypertension). Two concomitant secondary causes of hypertension were found in 6.4% of patients. Age >50 years (odds ratio: 5.2 [95% CI: 1.9–14.2]; P<0.01), neck circumference ≥41 cm for women and ≥43 cm for men (odds ratio: 4.7 [95% CI: 1.3–16.9]; P=0.02), and presence of snoring (odds ratio: 3.7 [95% CI: 1.3–11]; P=0.02) were predictors of obstructive sleep apnea. In conclusion, obstructive sleep apnea appears to be the most common condition associated with resistant hypertension. Age >50 years, large neck circumference measurement, and snoring are good predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in this population.
Introduction
Hypertension (HTN) affects approximately one third of the adult population and remains the most important cardiovascular risk factor in the general population.1 Twenty to 30% of the hypertensive population have resistant HTN defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite the concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, or the need for >3 medications to control BP.2 Patients with resistant HTN represent a special risk group because they are at increased risk of target organ damage and cardiovascular complications compared with patients with well-controlled HTN.3 The systematic search for secondary causes of HTN is mandatory among patients with resistant HTN,4 because it includes reversible conditions that may help to control BP. Moreover, the prevalence of secondary causes of HTN is thought to be greater in patients with resistant HTN than in patients with controlled HTN.2 Previous studies reported that the most prevalent causes of secondary HTN are renal parenchymal disease and renal artery stenosis.2 However, the prevalence of secondary causes of HTN in patients with resistant HTN quoted in current guidelines is derived from studies with several limitations, including the selection of only certain categories of secondary causes of HTN, failure to classify resistant HTN according to contemporary definitions, and absence of systematic evaluation of the most frequent causes of HTN.5,6
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway obstruction during sleep.7 OSA has been newly recognized as a secondary cause of HTN according to the Seventh Joint National Committee.4 There is mounting evidence that OSA is common among patients with HTN, ranging from 37%8 to 56%.9 Among patients with resistant HTN, the prevalence of OSA is extremely high, ranging from 70%10 to 83%.11 However, these previous studies were small and performed in a single center. More importantly, all of these investigations in patients with resistant HTN did not evaluate the predictors of OSA in this population and also did not investigate the other causes of secondary HTN. OSA triggers a cascade of adverse effects, including increased sympathetic activity, systemic inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation that may contribute to poor BP control. Moreover, the treatment of OSA by continuous positive airway pressure during sleep can reduce BP in patients with masked HTN,12 sustained,7 and specially in resistant HTN.13
In the present study, we sought to systematically investigate the prevalence of secondary causes of HTN among patients with resistant HTN. Based on the recent literature,11 we hypothesized that OSA is the most common known secondary cause of HTN associated with resistant HTN. Because OSA is largely underdiagnosed in the resistant HTN population,10,11 we also sought to investigate clinical predictors of OSA.
Methods
Patients
Consecutive patients with resistant HTN evaluated in the outpatient hypertension units of 2 independent cardiology hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil (Instituto do Coração-InCor, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, and Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia), were recruited in the period from February 2008 to April 2010. Resistant HTN was defined as uncontrolled office BP (>140/90 mm Hg) despite the concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive agents of different classes prescribed at optimal dosage, including a diuretic or the necessity of regular use of >3 medications to control BP.1 BP measurements were determined on separate occasions by ≥3 readings of systolic and diastolic (phase V) BPs obtained at 5-minute intervals with a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer, after patients had been seated for ≥15 minutes. BP values were determined by the average of the 2 last measures. In the first evaluation, BP was also measured in the lower limbs using an appropriate cuff to determine whether significant differences in BP (>20 mm Hg) between upper and lower limbs were present to suggest coarctation of the aorta.
Evaluations
All of the patients underwent a clinical and routine laboratory evaluation, which included measurement of glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, hemoglobin, and creatinine levels. Patients were classified as having metabolic syndrome, as described previously.14 Obesity was considered when body mass index was ≥30 kg/m2. Twenty-four–hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed with a SpaceLabs device (model 90207, SpaceLabs, Redmond, WA). Briefly, BP was measured every 10 minutes during the day (8:00 am to 11:00 pm) and every 20 minutes during the night (11:00 pm to 8:00 am). A nondipping pattern of BP during the night was defined as a drop in systolic or diastolic BP of <10% compared with daytime BP.
All of the participants were submitted to a standardized evaluation described below to investigate secondary causes of HTN irrespective of any clinical sign or symptom. If no secondary causes of HTN were identified, patients were considered as having primary HTN. The local ethics committees approved the protocol, and all of the participants provided written informed consent before participation. Patients who did not undergo a complete evaluation or who did not fulfill criteria for resistant HTN were excluded.
Investigation of Secondary Causes of HTN
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
All of the patients were evaluated by full polysomnography in the sleep laboratory using standard techniques and scoring criteria to monitor sleep stages and arousals from sleep, as described previously.15,16 Apneas were defined as a total absence of oronasal flow for ≥10 seconds and hypopneas as a clear decrease (>50%) in amplitude of oronasal flow for ≥10 seconds, followed by a 3% desaturation and/or arousal. The apnea-hypopnea index was obtained by dividing the total number of apneas and hypopneas by total sleep time. OSA was considered present when apnea-hypopnea index was ≥15 events per hour of sleep. This conservative cutoff was adopted because of the greater impact of moderate-to-severe OSA on BP control.17
Snoring was considered to be present if ≥2 of the following characteristics were present, snoring louder than talking, snoring >3 to 4 nights a week, snoring that bothered the bed partner, and awareness that they stop breathing during sleep >3 to 4 nights a week referred by the bed partner. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale was used to evaluate the degree of subjective excessive daytime sleepiness. Briefly, the patient rates the probability of falling asleep (0–3) in 8 different situations, and a score >10 points represents the presence of excessive daytime sleepiness.18 A neck circumference of ≥41 cm or ≥43 cm for women and men, respectively, was used to identify a body habitus that put subjects at increased risk of OSA.19
Primary Aldosteronism
Paired morning plasma aldosterone and plasma renin activity were performed. Patients under spironolactone use withdrew this medication 3 weeks before the blood sample. In patients with aldosterone:renin ratio >20, aldosterone suppression test was performed according to current guidelines.20 Briefly, primary hyperaldosteronism was diagnosed when plasma aldosterone determined after 2 L of intravenous saline infusion over 4 hours was >10 ng/dL.20 To diagnose aldosterone-producing adenoma or adrenal hyperplasia, all of the patients with confirmed primary hyperaldosteronism were submitted to a computed tomographic scan of the adrenal glands.
Renal Artery Stenosis
Doppler renal artery ultrasonography or renal scan with 99Tc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) was performed as the screening methods according to physician discretion. Doppler renal artery ultrasonography measurements were performed using a 3.5-MHz transducer (Toshiba Aplio XV, Crawley, West Sussex, United Kingdom). The pulsatility index was calculated, and a side-to-side difference of >0.20 was used as a criterion for renal artery stenosis. In addition, acceleration of the blood flow velocity during early systole21 was measured, and an acceleration of the blood flow >3 m/s2 was used as a criterion for renal artery stenosis.
Renal scan with 99Tc-DTPA was performed using a large field of view gamma camera (Siemens Basicam, Milpitas, CA). One-second images were acquired immediately after the bolus injection of 740 mBq 99Tc-DTPA during the first minute, followed by 30 images with 1-minute duration. The exams were analyzed visually, and 2 time-activity curves were also generated22 for the first minute (flow time-activity curve) and for the remaining 30 minutes (function curve). Individual renal relative function was considered abnormal if there was a difference of >10% between the kidneys. Patients with a positive screening for renal artery stenosis underwent gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance arteriography and, if necessary, were further referred for catheter angiography for final diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis.
Renal Parenchyma Disease
Other Causes
History of alcoholism, adrenergic medications, and oral contraceptives was systematically investigated. Pheochromocytoma was screened by determination of 24-hour urinary excretion of metanephrines. Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine were measured to evaluate thyroid function. Patients with systolic pressure differences between upper and lower limbs >20 mm Hg were further investigated for aortic coarctation. In addition, all of the patients had a chest radiograph. Patients with clinical signs and symptoms of Cushing syndrome were evaluated by measurements of 24-hour urinary free cortisol.2
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative variables were expressed as mean±SD. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency distribution and were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test. Univariate and multiple logistic regression (backward stepwise) analyses were used to determine the predictors of OSA in the entire population. Possible explanatory variables used as independent variables included demographic, clinical, and ambulatory BP monitoring values. Variables with a P value <0.1 in univariate analysis were entered into the multivariate model. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 17.0, statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Results
We initially evaluated 186 patients during the recruitment period, and 61 were excluded, resulting in a population of 125 patients (Figure 1). The population studied was generally middle aged, with a slight majority of women (Table 1). Secondary associated causes of HTN are summarized in Figure 2. OSA was present in 64.0% of the patients. Severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥30) was present in 40 patients (32.0%). Plasma aldosterone/renin >20 was present in 14 patients (11.2%). These patients underwent an aldosterone suppression test, and only 7 patients (5.6%) were diagnosed as having primary aldosteronism. Computed tomographic scan of adrenal glands was performed in the latter group (n=7), and 1 patient was diagnosed with aldosterone-producing adenoma (0.8%). Thirteen patients had a positive screening test for renal artery stenosis. Among this latter group, 3 patients were identified as having renal arterial stenosis after complete evaluation. Only 2 patients (1.6%) presented estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min and were defined as having renal parenchyma disease. Chronic kidney disease of lesser severity (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min) was present in 32 patients (26%). Eight patients (6.4%) had OSA plus another secondary cause of HTN, including 4 patients with primary aldosteronism, 2 patients with renal parenchymal disease, 1 patient with hypothyroidism, and 1 patient with renal artery stenosis. Forty-three patients (34.4%) had no identifiable causes of HTN and were considered as having primary HTN. There were no differences in the frequency of secondary forms of HTN between the 2 centers (Figure S1, available in the online Data Supplement, please see http://hyper.ahajournals.org).
Characteristics | Total (N=125) | No OSA (N=45) | OSA (N=80) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, y | 52±10 | 48±10 | 55±8 | <0.001 |
Male, % | 43 | 27 | 53 | 0.005 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 31.5±6.2 | 29.0±4.3 | 32.9±6.7 | <0.001 |
Neck circumference, cm | 39.3±4.1 | 37.3±4 | 40.4±4 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference, cm | 103±14 | 96±10 | 107±13 | <0.001 |
White, % | 48 | 46 | 49 | 0.83 |
Smoking, % | 6 | 11 | 3 | 0.04 |
Diabetes mellitus, % | 30 | 20 | 35 | 0.08 |
Stroke, % | 3.2 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.54 |
Dyslipidemia, % | 80 | 71 | 85 | 0.06 |
Metabolic syndrome, %* | 67 | 53 | 75 | 0.013 |
Familial history of HTN, % | 78 | 88 | 78 | 0.74 |
Heart rate, bpm | 70±14 | 73±12 | 68±15 | 0.09 |
Systolic BP, mm Hg | 176±31 | 179±28 | 174±32 | 0.44 |
Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 107±19 | 109±17 | 106±20 | 0.44 |
No. of drugs, n | 6 (5–8) | 6 (5–7) | 7 (5–9) | 0.08 |
No. of antihypertensive drugs, n | 5 (4–6) | 5 (4–5) | 5 (4–6) | 0.97 |
Thiazides/loop diuretics, % | 98 | 100 | 96 | 0.19 |
Spironolactone, % | 30 | 31 | 29 | 0.78 |
β-blocker, % | 85 | 82 | 86 | 0.55 |
ACEI, % | 78 | 85 | 75 | 0.22 |
Calcium channel blocker, % | 94 | 89 | 95 | 0.21 |
ARB, % | 26 | 24 | 26 | 0.82 |
Centrally acting drugs (clonidine/methyldopa), % | 59 | 62 | 58 | 0.61 |
Values are mean±SD. Variables with skewed distribution are presented as median (interquartile range). HTN indicates hypertension; BP, blood pressure; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; AHI, apnea-hypopnea index.
*
Data are based on Adult Treatment Panel III.
The characteristics of the population according to the presence or absence of OSA are presented in Table 1. Among patients with OSA, age, body mass index, and the proportion of men and of those with metabolic syndrome were higher than in patients without OSA. Twenty-four–hour ambulatory BP monitoring values did not differ between patients without and with OSA in these patients with resistant HTN (Table 2). Laboratory and sleep study results of the entire population, and divided according to the absence or presence of OSA, are presented in Table 3. The level of serum creatinine was higher and of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was lower in those with compared with those without OSA.
Characteristics | Total (N=125) | No OSA (N=45) | OSA (N=80) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Systolic daytime ABP | 146±21 | 149±25 | 144±18 | 0.29 |
Diastolic daytime ABP | 89±16 | 93±17 | 87±14 | 0.06 |
Systolic nocturnal ABP | 135±21 | 137±25 | 134±18 | 0.58 |
Diastolic nocturnal ABP | 78±15 | 81±16 | 76±14 | 0.08 |
Systolic nocturnal dipping ABP, mm Hg | 7.0±8.3 | 8.0±7.7 | 6.4±8.6 | 0.35 |
Diastolic nocturnal dipping ABP, mm Hg | 12.6±8.8 | 12.7±7.8 | 12.6±9.3 | 0.96 |
Systolic nondipping, % | 61 | 53 | 65 | 0.24 |
Diastolic nondipping, % | 39 | 36 | 41 | 0.62 |
Values are mean±SD. Variables with skewed distribution are presented as median (interquartile range). ABP indicates ambulatory blood pressure (available in 104 patients); OSA, obstructive sleep apnea.
Variable | Total (N=125) | No OSA (N=45) | OSA (N=80) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.94 (0.77–1.28) | 0.86 (0.70–1.04) | 1.00 (0.80–1.41) | 0.002 |
Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 100 (91–117) | 98 (85–110) | 101 (93–128) | 0.10 |
Cholesterol, mg/dL | 192 (168–218) | 193 (169–211) | 191 (197–221) | 0.77 |
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 114 (97–137) | 108 (92–133) | 119 (99–138) | 0.20 |
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 44 (37–52) | 47 (40–53) | 42 (35–49) | 0.04 |
Triglycerides, mg/dL | 131 (90–189) | 110 (79–175) | 140 (107–198) | 0.06 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14 (13–15) | 14 (13–15) | 14 (13–16) | 0.65 |
Sleep variables | ||||
Snoring, % | 77 | 54 | 86 | 0.001 |
Epworth sleepiness scale, score | 8 (5–13) | 7 (4–13) | 10 (6–14) | 0.28 |
AHI, events/hour | 18 (10–40) | 7 (3–11) | 30 (20–51) | <0.001 |
Arousals, n | 106 (53–189) | 60 (29–95) | 142 (95–237) | <0.001 |
Awake SaO2, % | 95 (94–96) | 96 (95–97) | 95 (93–96) | 0.001 |
Mean SaO2, % | 94 (92–95) | 95 (94–97) | 93 (91–94) | <0.001 |
Lowest SaO2, % | 84 (78–89) | 89 (85–91) | 81 (75–86) | <0.001 |
SaO2<90%, % of sleep time | 0.7 (0–8.5) | 0 (0–0.4) | 4.0 (0.3–17.0) | <0.001 |
Variables with skewed distribution are presented as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified. AHI indicates apnea-hypopnea index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; SaO2, arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation.
We also investigated the characteristics associated with OSA. Sensitivity and specificity for both abnormal systolic and diastolic BP dipping patterns during the night to diagnose OSA were 64% and 39% and 47% and 64%, respectively. Large neck circumference and diabetes mellitus had low sensitivity (33% and 36%) but high specificity (84% and 80%), respectively, to diagnose OSA. Snoring and dyslipidemia also had relatively high sensitivity (87%) but poor specificity (57% and 30%), respectively, to diagnose OSA. Univariate logistic regression identified male sex, large neck circumference, snoring, metabolic syndrome, age >50 years, and obesity as predictors of OSA among patients with resistant HTN. A multivariate model identified large neck circumference, snoring, and age >50 years as independent predictors of OSA among patients with resistant HTN (Table 4). After performing a collinearity test, we excluded multicollinearity in the variables included in our model.
Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | P | β Coefficient | SE | OR (CI) | P | |
Male | 3.00 | 0.006 | ||||
Large neck circumference | 2.77 | 0.032 | 1.55 | 0.65 | 4.7 (1.3–16.9) | 0.02 |
Waist circumference | 1.40 | 0.42 | ||||
Snoring | 5.43 | 0.001 | 1.31 | 0.55 | 3.7 (1.3–11.0) | 0.02 |
Metabolic syndrome | 2.63 | 0.015 | ||||
Age >50 y | 4.97 | <0.001 | 1.63 | 0.52 | 5.2 (1.9–14.2) | 0.002 |
Systolic nondipping | 0.60 | 0.20 | ||||
Diastolic nondipping | 0.81 | 0.62 | ||||
Epworth Sleepiness Scale | 1.24 | 0.61 | ||||
Obesity | 2.20 | 0.038 | ||||
Constant | … | … | −3.36 | 0.97 | 0.035 | 0.001 |
Data are presented as odds ratios (95% CIs).
Discussion
Our study systematically evaluated for the first time the usual forms of secondary HTN using the contemporary classification adopted by the Seventh Joint National Committee4 and included an evaluation for OSA in a consecutive sample of patients with resistant HTN from 2 independent tertiary centers. Our data gave rise to several novel findings. First, almost twos thirds of the patients presented some secondary cause of HTN, a much higher prevalence than described in previous studies. Second, OSA was by far the most common secondary condition associated with resistant HTN. Third, snoring, age >50 years, and large neck circumference were predictors of OSA in this population. In contrast, excessive daytime sleepiness, a common symptom in patients with OSA, was not a good predictor of OSA in this resistant HTN population. Because the treatment of OSA can reduce BP, our results, therefore, suggest that the systematic search for and treatment of OSA should be included in the management of patients with resistant HTN.
The prevalence of secondary causes of HTN is believed to be higher among patients with resistant HTN than in the general hypertensive population.2 However, most studies of causes and prevalence of resistant HTN quoted in text books are >30 years old, before contemporary concepts, such as definitions, investigation, and management of HTN, were well defined, and more importantly, before OSA became recognized as a secondary cause of HTN. Primary aldosteronism was found in 5.6% in our population and is, therefore, in line with some of the previous studies that showed a prevalence ranging from 5% to 25%. The reasons for a much higher prevalence of primary aldosteronism in a few studies may reflect a referral bias related to the search for only 1 specific disease.5 The prevalence of renal parenchymal disease in our study (1.6%) is within the range of that reported in the literature (2% to 5%).24 Therefore, the most important and novel finding of our study was that the most common secondary cause of HTN that we identified in our resistant HTN population was OSA. The 64% prevalence of OSA is consistent with previous smaller studies that suggested a prevalence of OSA of ≈80%.11 One recent study evaluated secondary causes of HTN in a heterogeneous group of patients who visited an emergency department with a diagnosis of hypertensive urgency/emergency. OSA was present in 70.8% of the patients, whereas other causes of HTN were much less common.25 However, this study did not involve patients with resistant HTN, and some patients had no previous history of HTN. Our study, therefore, makes a significant contribution to the literature by showing that, compared with other recognized secondary causes of HTN, OSA was far more commonly associated with resistant HTN.
The reasons for the high prevalence of OSA among patients with resistant HTN are probably multiple. First, both resistant HTN and OSA may share common risk factors. The population studied in the present study was obese (body mass index: ≈32 kg/m2). Obesity, a common feature of patients with resistant HTN, is also a well-known risk factor for OSA.17 Second, recent evidence demonstrates that, compared with patients with controlled HTN, those with resistant HTN have a higher apnea-hypopnea index that is proportional to a greater degree of fluid volume displacement from the legs into the neck overnight. Such overnight rostral fluid shift may play a major role in the genesis of upper airway obstruction during sleep.26 Lastly, the high prevalence of OSA among patients with resistant HTN may be an indication that OSA is contributing to their poor BP control. There are several mechanisms by which OSA could contribute to poor BP control. These include increased sympathetic nervous system activity, decreased baroreflex sensitivity, vascular endothelial dysfunction, and altered metabolism of salt and water.27–29 The observation that treating OSA in patients with resistant HTN causes a greater fall in BP than in normotensive patients and patients with controlled HTN supports a causal relationship between OSA and drug-resistant HTN. The treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure can reduce BP,13,30,31 and, therefore, diagnosis and treatment of OSA may play a significant role in the management of patients with resistant HTN. However, these studies did not provide strong evidence yet, and further studies evaluating the effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on BP control are necessary.
Despite the growing awareness of OSA, it is estimated that most patients remain undiagnosed. One reason for this may be a lack of daytime somnolence, as indicated by relatively low Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores in our patients with OSA (Table 3). This symptom, one of the main reasons for referral to sleep laboratories to rule out OSA, was not a predictor of OSA in our study. It has been shown that, compared with patients without cardiovascular diseases, those with heart failure and stroke have less subjective daytime sleepiness at any given level of OSA severity.32,33 It may be that, for reasons yet to be determined, patients with resistant HTN also have relatively little daytime somnolence.9,34 The lack of daytime somnolence in patients with resistant HTN and other cardiovascular diseases may help to explain the low clinical suspicion and recognition of OSA in patients with these disorders.9 We have demonstrated that, in our patients, increased age, large neck circumference, and snoring are useful tools for predicting OSA. The nondipping pattern of BP during the night has been reported as a feature of patients with OSA. However, these reports did not specifically address patients with resistant HTN.35 In contrast to those reports, we were not able to find an association between the nocturnal dipping pattern and the presence of OSA. It is possible that antihypertensive medications attenuated this phenomenon.
Our study has some limitations. One potential limitation is that patients with severe forms of renal parenchyma disease may be referred directly to a renal clinic, decreasing its frequency in our population. However, there were no restrictions to evaluate patients with renal disease and resistant HTN in both cardiology centers. Second, adrenal vein sampling for aldosterone measurement is the most appropriate method to determine subtypes of primary aldosteronism rather than blood samples and adrenal imaging. However, this procedure is invasive and not used in clinical routine. Finally, because of the cross-sectional nature of this study, it is not possible to demonstrate that the secondary forms of HTN identified in our patients were causes of their resistant HTN. However, because there is a growing body of evidence that the treatment of OSA reduces BP, it is likely that, in many instances, treatment of OSA would lower BP. Strengths of our study are the relative large number of patients evaluated, the strict protocol used following current recommendations to evaluate resistant HTN, and the involvement of 2 cardiology centers dedicated to evaluating patients with resistant HTN, suggesting the generalizability of the results.
Perspectives
Our study demonstrated that OSA was the most common coexisting treatable secondary form of HTN associated with drug-resistant HTN. Age >50 years, large neck circumference measurement, and snoring are good predictors of OSA in this population. These findings may help to improve the recognition and treatment of OSA that ultimately may contribute to decrease the cardiovascular risk in patients with resistant HTN.
Supplemental Material
File (bb-179788-online_sup.pdf)
- Download
- 33.47 KB
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and Fundação Zerbini.
References
1.
Staessen JA, Wang J, Bianchi G, Birkenhäger WH. Essential hypertension. Lancet. 2003;361:1629–1641.
2.
Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, Ferdinand K, Giles TD, Falkner B, Carey RM; American Heart Association Professional Education Committee. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–1419.
3.
Cuspidi C, Macca G, Sampieri L, Michev I, Salerno M, Fusi V, Severgnini B, Meani S, Magrini F, Zanchetti A. High prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac organ damage in refractory hypertension. J Hypertens. 2001;19:2063–2070.
4.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Roccella EJ, for the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.
5.
Strauch B, Zelinka T, Hampf M, Bernhardt R, Widimsky J. Prevalence of primary hyperaldosteronism in moderate to severe hypertension in the Central Europe region. J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:349–352.
6.
Garg JP, Elliott WJ, Folker A, Izhar M, Black HR. Resistant hypertension revisited: a comparison of two university-based cohorts. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:619–626.
7.
Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet. 2009;373:82–93.
8.
Sjöström C, Lindberg E, Elmasry A, Hägg A, Svärdsudd K, Janson C. Prevalence of sleep apnea and snoring in hypertensive men: a population based study. Thorax. 2002;57:602–607.
9.
Drager LF, Genta PR, Pedrosa RP, Nerbass FB, Gonzaga CC, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. Characteristics and predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1135–1139.
10.
Gonçalves SC, Martinez D, Gus M, de Abreu-Silva EO, Bertoluci C, Dutra I, Branchi T, Moreira LB, Fuchs SC, de Oliveira AC, Fuchs FD. Obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: a case-control study. Chest. 2007;132:1858–1862.
11.
Logan AG, Perlikowski SM, Mente A, Tisler A, Tkacova R, Niroumand M, Leung RS, Bradley TD. High prevalence of unrecognized sleep apnea in drug-resistant hypertension. J Hypertens. 2001;19:2271–2277.
12.
Drager LF, Pedrosa RP, Diniz PM, Diegues-Silva L, Marcondes B, Couto RB, Giorgi DM, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. The effects of continuous positive airway pressure on prehypertension and masked hypertension in men with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2011;57:549–555.
13.
Lozano L, Tovar JL, Sampol G, Romero O, Jurado MJ, Segarra A, Espinel E, Ríos J, Untoria MD, Lloberes P. Continuous positive airway pressure treatment in sleep apnea patients with resistant hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial. J Hypertens. 2010;28:2161–2168.
14.
Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC, Spertus JA, Costa F; American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement [published correction appears in Circulation. 2005; 112:e297]. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752.
15.
Drager LF, Bortolotto LA, Lorenzi MC, Figueiredo AC, Krieger EM, Lorenzi-Filho G. Early signs of atherosclerosis in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:613–618.
16.
American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2007.
17.
Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Skatrud J. Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1378–1384.
18.
Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14:540–545.
19.
Davies RJ, Stradling JR. The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1990;3:509–514.
20.
Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, Gomez-Sanchez CE, Mantero F, Stowasser M, Young WF, Montori VM, for the Endocrine Society. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3266–3281.
21.
Handa N, Fukunaga R, Uehara A, Etani H, Yoneda S, Kimura K, Kamada T. Echo-Doppler velocimeter in the diagnosis of hypertensive patients: the renal artery Doppler technique. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986;12:945–952.
22.
Granerus G, Moonen M. Effects of extra-renal background subtraction and kidney depth correction in the measurement of GFR by gamma camera renography. Nucl Med Commun. 1991;12:519–527.
23.
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470.
24.
Victor RG, Kaplan NM. Systemic Hypertension: Mechanisms and Diagnosis. In:, Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP. Braunwald's Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008:1027–1048.
25.
Börgel J, Springer S, Ghafoor J, Arndt D, Duchna HW, Barthel A, Werner S, Van Helden J, Hanefeld C, Neubauer H, Bulut D, Mügge A. Unrecognized secondary causes of hypertension in patients with hypertensive urgency/emergency: prevalence and co-prevalence. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99:499–506.
26.
Friedman O, Bradley TD, Chan CT, Parkes R, Logan AG. Relationship between overnight rostral fluid shift and obstructive sleep apnea in drug-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2010;56:1077–1082.
27.
Dempsey JA, Veasey SC, Morgan BJ, O'Donnell CP. Pathophysiology of sleep apnea. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:47–112.
28.
Kohler M, Stradling JR. Mechanisms of vascular damage in obstructive sleep apnea. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:677–685.
29.
Foster GE, Brugniaux JV, Pialoux V, Duggan CT, Hanly PJ, Ahmed SB, Poulin MJ. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to acute hypoxia following exposure to intermittent hypoxia in healthy humans. J Physiol. 2009;587:3287–3299.
30.
Kohler M, Pepperell JC, Casadei B, Craig S, Crosthwaite N, Stradling JR, Davies RJ. CPAP and measures of cardiovascular risk in males with OSAS. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1488–1496.
31.
Logan AG, Tkacova R, Perlikowski SM, Leung RS, Tisler A, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Refractory hypertension and sleep apnea: effect of CPAP on blood pressure and baroreflex. Eur Respir J. 2003;21:241–247.
32.
Arzt M, Young T, Finn L, Skatrud JB, Ryan CM, Newton GE, Mak S, Parker JD, Floras JS, Bradley TD. Sleepiness and sleep in patients with both systolic heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1716–1722.
33.
Arzt M, Young T, Peppard PE, Finn L, Ryan CM, Bayley M, Bradley TD. Dissociation of obstructive sleep apnea from hypersomnolence and obesity in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:e129–e134.
34.
Gus M, Gonçalves SC, Martinez D, de Abreu Silva EO, Moreira LB, Fuchs SC, Fuchs FD. Risk for obstructive sleep apnea by Berlin questionnaire, but not daytime sleepiness, is associated with resistant hypertension: a case-control study. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:832–835.
35.
Portaluppi F, Provini F, Cortelli P, Plazzi G, Bertozzi N, Manfredini R, Fersini C, Lugaresi E. Undiagnosed sleep-disordered breathing among male nondippers with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1227–1233.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2011 American Heart Association, Inc.
Versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
History
Received: 16 July 2011
Revision received: 10 August 2011
Accepted: 10 September 2011
Published online: 3 October 2011
Published in print: November 2011
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
Disclosures
None.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Respiratory Pathology and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Scoping Review, Open Respiratory Archives, 7, 1, (100392), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100392
- Bidirectional interplay of sleep apnea syndrome and cardio-vascular disorders in diabetes, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 220, (111984), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111984
- Liver in systemic diseases—Part 2, Hepatology, (1049-1084), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-26711-6.00037-8
- Sociodemographic and Clinical Correlates of Uncontrolled Hypertension in Patients on Treatment for Hypertension in a Family Practice in Southwest Nigeria, Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences, (2024).https://doi.org/10.4103/njbcs.njbcs_49_24
- Syncopal Seizure: A Rare Manifestation of Takayasu Arteritis, Neurology India, (2024).https://doi.org/10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-24-00424
- Clinical guidelines of the Russian Medical Society on arterial Hypertension (RSH) and the Eurasian association of Cardiologists (EaC) for the diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension (2024), Systemic Hypertension, 21, 4, (5-110), (2024).https://doi.org/10.38109/2075-082X-2024-4-5-109
- Etiology in resistant hypertension, Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 6, 3, (232-239), (2024).https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1455488
- Metabolic Crossroads: Unveiling the Complex Interactions between Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and Metabolic Syndrome, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25, 6, (3243), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063243
- Resolution of the Council of Experts “The choice of antihypertensive therapy in patients with hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome”, Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases, 13, 1, (122-127), (2024).https://doi.org/10.17802/2306-1278-2024-13-1-122-127
- The Global Burden of Resistant Hypertension and Potential Treatment Options, European Cardiology Review, 19, (2024).https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2023.51
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.