Skip main navigation

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and the COVID-19 Pandemic

At Present There Is No Evidence to Abandon Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers
Originally published 2020;75:1382–1385


During the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, some reports of data still emerging and in need of full analysis indicate that certain groups of patients are at risk of COVID-19. This includes patients with hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and clearly the elderly. Many of those patients are treated with renin-angiotensin system blockers. Because the ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) protein is the receptor that facilitates coronavirus entry into cells, the notion has been popularized that treatment with renin-angiotensin system blockers might increase the risk of developing a severe and fatal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection. The present article discusses this concept. ACE2 in its full-length form is a membrane-bound enzyme, whereas its shorter (soluble) form circulates in blood at very low levels. As a mono-carboxypeptidase, ACE2 contributes to the degradation of several substrates including angiotensins I and II. ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors do not inhibit ACE2 because ACE and ACE2 are different enzymes. Although angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers have been shown to upregulate ACE2 in experimental animals, the evidence is not always consistent and differs among the diverse angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers and differing organs. Moreover, there are no data to support the notion that ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker administration facilitates coronavirus entry by increasing ACE2 expression in either animals or humans. Indeed, animal data support elevated ACE2 expression as conferring potential protective pulmonary and cardiovascular effects. In summary, based on the currently available evidence, treatment with renin-angiotensin system blockers should not be discontinued because of concerns with coronavirus infection.

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has already taken on pandemic proportions, having infected >100 000 people in 100 countries.1 Although the major current focus of public health authorities is to develop a coordinated global response to prepare health systems to meet this unprecedented challenge, a corollary concern has been identified that is of particular interest to clinicians and investigators with a major interest in hypertension. Hypertension, coronary heart disease, and diabetes mellitus, particularly in elderly people, increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection.1–3 Given that ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) is the receptor that allows coronavirus entry into cells, the idea has come up that preexisting use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers might increase the risk of developing a severe and fatal SARS-CoV-2 infection.2 This commentary discusses this concern and concludes that based on current evidence, there is no reason to abandon RAS blockers in patients receiving this important class of antihypertensive agents because of concerns of either increased risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 or worsening its course.

Coronavirus and ACE2

In 2003, Li et al4 demonstrated that ACE2 is the receptor responsible for SARS coronavirus entry. Binding to the ACE2 receptor requires the surface unit of a viral spike protein (S1; Figure).5,6 Subsequent cell entry relies on priming by the serine protease TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2).5 Two recent reports confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 also enters the cell via this route.7,8 Importantly, SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cell could be blocked both by S-protein neutralizing antibodies and TMPRSS2 inhibitors (camostat mesylate).7 In the lung, ACE2 expression occurs in type 2 pneumocytes and macrophages. Generally, however, pulmonary ACE2 expression is low when compared with other organs like the intestine, testis, heart, and kidney.9–11


Figure. Overview of the connections between renin-angiotensin system blockers, ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) and the coronavirus. The carboxypeptidase ACE2 converts Ang II (angiotensin II) to Ang-(1–7) and Ang I to Ang-(1–9) (A), yet is not blocked by ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors, which prevent the conversion of Ang I to Ang II. ACE2 also binds and internalizes SARS-Cov-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; B), after priming by the serine protease TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2). Shedding of membrane-bound ACE2 by a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) results in the occurrence of soluble (s) ACE2, which can no longer mediate SARS-Cov-2 entry and which might even prevent such entry by keeping the virus in solution. AT1R (Ang II, via its type 1 receptor) upregulates ADAM17, and AT1R blockers (ARBs) would prevent this.

ACE2 and the RAS

ACE2 displays considerable homology with ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme; 40% identity and 61% similarity) and on this basis received its name in 2000.12 As a mono-carboxypeptidase, it hydrolyzes multiple peptides, including apelin, opioids, kinins, and angiotensins. Much of the work on ACE2 has centered on the biologic effects related to the formation of angiotensin-(1–7) from angiotensin II.13,14 Unlike ACE, ACE2 does not convert angiotensin I to angiotensin II, nor do ACE inhibitors block its activity. This is not surprising because the homology does not concern the active site. ACE2 is the most potent of the 3 enzymes known to convert the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II to angiotensin-(1–7).9,15 Angiotensin-(1–7) is increasingly recognized to have organ-protective properties that oppose and counterbalance those of angiotensin II. Within the RAS, the other known target peptide for ACE2 cleavage is angiotensin I, with the subsequent formation of angiotensin-(1–9) (Figure).

ACE2 is a membrane-bound enzyme, and its (soluble) levels in blood are very low.9,15 Cleavage of its membrane-anchor (shedding) by ADAM17 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17) (Figure) underlies its occurrence in body fluids. Angiotensin II, via its AT1 (angiotensin II type 1) receptor, upregulates ADAM17, thus increasing soluble ACE2 levels.16 In urine, soluble ACE2 levels can be significant and likely originate from shedding from the proximal tubular membrane. In pathological states, shedding of ACE2 is often increased, resulting in elevated soluble ACE2 levels in blood, urine, and other body fluids.17,18 Indeed, a doubling of soluble ACE2 has been reported in cerebrospinal fluid of hypertensive patients.16 However, given that by far the majority of ACE2 is membrane-bound, even a doubling is unlikely to significantly alter the amount of membrane-bound ACE2. For instance, if 2% of ACE2 occurs in a soluble form, doubling would increase this to 4%, while still 96% of ACE2 is membrane-bound. Theoretically, RAS blockade might (partly) reverse this, thus returning the percent of membrane-bound ACE2 to 97–98. This is unlikely to seriously affect SARS-CoV-2 entry, which depends on membrane-bound (full-length) ACE2.

What Are the Effects of RAS Blockers on ACE2?

This is really at the crux of the question and the prevailing confusion and panic that we are witnessing in the medical community after the word came out that ACE2 is the receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Part of the confusion in social media and the public in general stands because, at times, ACE inhibitors are confused with ACE2 inhibitors. Those are 2 different enzymes with 2 different active sites and any effect of ACE inhibitors on ACE2 activity must therefore be an indirect one, via their respective substrates. This is unlikely to have any relationship with SARS-CoV-2 binding. There are, however, limited reports that ACE inhibitors affect the expression of ACE2 in the heart and the kidney.19 AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) alter ACE2 expression more consistently in several studies, both at the mRNA and protein level.19–21 Upregulation has been best documented in cardiac tissue and in the renal vasculature. Yet, even here, results are diverse, required high doses, and often differed per ARB and per organ. Given the relationship with ADAM17, a clear distinction should be made between membrane-bound and soluble ACE2 because an increase in soluble ACE2, if anything, might imply a decrease in membrane-bound ACE2. Because measuring membrane-bound ACE2 in vivo is technically challenging, most publications from humans have reported levels of ACE2 activity in blood that reflect the soluble ACE2 protein circulating at very low levels.22 If ARBs as a drug class would truly upregulate membrane-bound ACE2, it is reasonable to first assume that this is because of AT1 receptor blockade. In agreement with this assumption, angiotensin II acutely induced ACE2 internalization via its AT1 receptor in ACE2-transfected neuroblastoma cells.23 ACE inhibitors should then have the same directional effect as ARBs, although for these drugs there is very limited data showing upregulation of ACE2. Esler and Esler24 suggested that the difference is due to the increased levels of angiotensin II occurring after ARB treatment (but not ACE inhibition): high angiotensin II levels would impose an increased substrate load on the enzyme, thus requiring its upregulation. Here it should be stressed that the carboxypeptidase ACE2 has multiple substrates and that an alteration in the level of one of these substrates (angiotensin II, occurring at fmol/mL levels, ie, many orders of magnitude below the actual ACE2 concentration!) cannot possibly make a meaningful difference in its substrate load.

Taken together, there is evidence from animal studies that ARBs may upregulate membrane-bound ACE2, whereas ACE inhibitors may not. The current data, however, are often conflicting and vary between ARBs and tissue (eg, heart versus kidney). Even if the reported upregulation of tissue ACE2 by ARBs in animal studies and generally with high doses could be extrapolated to humans, this would not establish that it is sufficient to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 entry.

We like to point out that a potentially beneficial pulmonary effect of ARBs needs to be considered as well. During acute lung injury, alveolar ACE2 appears to be downregulated.25,26 This would decrease angiotensin II metabolism, thus resulting in higher local levels of this peptide, which increases alveolar permeability and fosters lung injury. In this context, one can speculate that having increased ACE2 expression by preexisting ARBs treatment may actually be protective in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Risks of Abandoning RAS Treatment in Corona Patients

It is not clear how hypertension was coded in the recent SARS-CoV-2 report1—we can only speculate that it might be based on the use of hypertension medication rather than actual blood pressure measurement. To truly address whether patients with hypertension are more likely to get serious and fatal SARS-CoV-2 infections, a prospective cohort study with incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of patients with hypertension and patients without hypertension is required, with similar exposure history. Instead, what has been reported is history of hypertension versus not, in SARS-CoV-2 patients, without any adjustment (eg, for age). The use of RAS blockers as a causal link is an assumption that lacks evidence, as discussed here. We therefore strongly recommend that patients who are taking ACE inhibitors or ARBs for high blood pressure, heart failure, or other medical indications should not withdraw their current treatment regimens unless they are specifically advised to do so by their physician or healthcare provider. There is an additional caveat. Any resulting destabilizing of blood pressure control in hypertension, which might possibly occur with medication changes, would carry unacceptable risks of precipitating strokes and heart attacks, risks which clearly are not just hypothetical. Simply discontinuing antihypertensive agents is strongly discouraged and should not be an option, considering the widespread use of RAS blockers throughout the world. In particular, Asian people seem to be more prone to cough, and therefore, ARBs may be preferable.27

Next Steps

The available clinical database from the pandemic to date is insufficient to provide sufficient detail on the variables of interest: hypertension diagnosis and the antihypertensive drugs prescribed to test the hypotheses proposed and provide certitude. Hence such information is desperately needed.

Although no therapy is currently established for SARS-CoV-2 patients, the field is moving rapidly with potential approaches being considered. Those include broad spectrum antivirals such as favipiravir and remdesivir,28 TMPRSS2 inhibition with camostat mesylate,7 and ADAM17 upregulation. A more specific approach might be using soluble recombinant ACE2 protein to intercept the virus from binding to the full-length ACE2 anchored in the cell plasma membrane.6 These approaches make the most sense for the treatment of patients with high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. For preventive purposes, the goal, of course, is the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

In closing, we see no reason to abandon or discontinue temporarily the use of RAS blockers preventatively in SARS-CoV-2 patients.29 There are some concerns that these agents, particularly ARBs, can affect the expression of ACE2 based on animal models that, however, have not been challenged with coronavirus infection to evaluate the impact of RAS blocker therapy. Since this information is lacking, we see no rationale to panic and to alter the prescription of this critically important class of antihypertensives. Their therapeutic benefit, in our opinion, outweighs any potential risk of them predisposing to corona infection. Moreover, it is unknown whether alternative antihypertensives do not carry the same risk. Another question is what to do in infected individuals with risk to progress to end-stage renal disease. Here the decision should be based on clinical judgment and considering the pros and cons of RAS blockade in the acutely ill, such as the presence or absence of hypotension and kidney function.

Take Home Messages

  • ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) is the receptor that allows coronavirus entry into cells.

  • ACE2 in its full-length form is a membrane-bound enzyme, whereas its shorter (soluble) form circulates in blood at very low levels.

  • ACE inhibitors do not inhibit ACE2 because ACE and ACE2 are different enzymes.

  • Although angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers have been suggested to upregulate ACE2, the evidence is not fully consistent and differs per angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker and per organ.

  • There are no data supporting that ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers facilitate coronavirus entry by increasing ACE2 expression.

  • Animal data support a potential protective pulmonary and cardiovascular effects of elevated ACE2 expression.

  • Treatment with RAS blockers should not be discontinued because of concerns with coronavirus infection based on the currently available evidence.


We thank Estrellita Uijl for preparing the Figure.


Correspondence to: A.H. Jan Danser, Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee-1418b Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Email


  • 1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.Lancet. 2020; 395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system [published ahead of print].Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for Covid-19 infection? [published online ahead of print].Lancet Respir Med. 2020. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus.Nature. 2003; 426:450–454. doi: 10.1038/nature02145CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Matsuyama S, Nagata N, Shirato K, Kawase M, Takeda M, Taguchi F. Efficient activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2.J Virol. 2010; 84:12658–12664. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01542-10CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Batlle D, Wysocki J, Satchell K. Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: a potential approach for coronavirus infection therapy?Clin Sci (Lond). 2020; 134:543–545. doi: 10.1042/CS20200163CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Kruger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, Schiergens TS, Herrler G, Wu NH, Nitsche A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor [published ahead of print].Cell. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, Si HR, Zhu Y, Li B, Huang CL, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.Nature. 2020; 579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Serfozo P, Wysocki J, Gulua G, Schulze A, Ye M, Liu P, Jin J, Bader M, Myöhänen T, García-Horsman JA, et al. Ang II (Angiotensin II) conversion to angiotensin-(1-7) in the circulation is POP (prolyloligopeptidase)-dependent and ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2)-independent.Hypertension. 2020; 75:173–182. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14071LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis ML, Lely AT, Navis G, van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis.J Pathol. 2004; 203:631–637. doi: 10.1002/path.1570CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Lely AT, Hamming I, van Goor H, Navis GJ. Renal ACE2 expression in human kidney disease.J Pathol. 2004; 204:587–593. doi: 10.1002/path.1670CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Tipnis SR, Hooper NM, Hyde R, Karran E, Christie G, Turner AJ. A human homolog of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase.J Biol Chem. 2000; 275:33238–33243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002615200CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Batlle D, Wysocki J, Soler MJ, Ranganath K. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2: enhancing the degradation of angiotensin II as a potential therapy for diabetic nephropathy.Kidney Int. 2012; 81:520–528. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.381CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Ferrario CM, Chappell MC, Tallant EA, Brosnihan KB, Diz DI. Counterregulatory actions of angiotensin-(1-7).Hypertension. 1997; 30(3 Pt 2):535–541. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.30.3.535LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Arendse LB, Danser AHJ, Poglitsch M, Touyz RM, Burnett JC, Llorens-Cortes C, Ehlers MR, Sturrock ED. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting the renin-angiotensin system and associated peptides in hypertension and heart failure.Pharmacol Rev. 2019; 71:539–570. doi: 10.1124/pr.118.017129CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Xu J, Sriramula S, Xia H, Moreno-Walton L, Culicchia F, Domenig O, Poglitsch M, Lazartigues E. Clinical relevance and role of neuronal AT1 receptors in ADAM17-mediated ACE2 shedding in neurogenic hypertension.Circ Res. 2017; 121:43–55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310509LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Wysocki J, Goodling A, Burgaya M, Whitlock K, Ruzinski J, Batlle D, Afkarian M. Urine RAS components in mice and people with type 1 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017; 313:F487–F494. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00074.2017CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Bitker L, Burrell LM. Classic and nonclassic renin-angiotensin systems in the critically ill.Crit Care Clin. 2019; 35:213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2018.11.002CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Ferrario CM, Jessup J, Chappell MC, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, Tallant EA, Diz DI, Gallagher PE. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.Circulation. 2005; 111:2605–2610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.510461LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Wang X, Ye Y, Gong H, Wu J, Yuan J, Wang S, Yin P, Ding Z, Kang L, Jiang Q, et al. The effects of different angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on the regulation of the ACE-AngII-AT1 and ACE2-Ang(1-7)-Mas axes in pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling in male mice.J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016; 97:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.05.012CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Soler MJ, Ye M, Wysocki J, William J, Lloveras J, Batlle D. Localization of ACE2 in the renal vasculature: amplification by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade using telmisartan.Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009; 296:F398–F405. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.90488.2008CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Ramchand J, Patel SK, Kearney LG, Matalanis G, Farouque O, Srivastava PM, Burrell LM. Plasma ACE2 activity predicts mortality in aortic stenosis and is associated with severe myocardial fibrosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 13:655–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.09.005CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Deshotels MR, Xia H, Sriramula S, Lazartigues E, Filipeanu CM. Angiotensin II mediates angiotensin converting enzyme type 2 internalization and degradation through an angiotensin II type I receptor-dependent mechanism.Hypertension. 2014; 64:1368–1375. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03743LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Esler M, Esler D. Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic? [published ahead online]J Hypertens. 2020. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Gurwitz D. Angiotensin receptor blockers as tentative SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics [published online ahead of print].Drug Dev Res. 2020. doi: 10.1002/ddr.21656CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, Huan Y, Guo F, Guan B, Yang P, Sarao R, Wada T, Leong-Poi H, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure.Nature. 2005; 436:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature03712CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Mazzolai L, Burnier M. Angiotensin receptor antagonists: safety and tolerability profile.Epstein M, Brunner HR, eds. In: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 2000:341–352.Google Scholar
  • 28. Li G, De Clercq E. Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020; 19:149–150. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00016-0CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. de Simone G. Position Statement of the ESC Council on Hypertension on ACE-Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.2020. Accessed March 16, 2020.Google Scholar


eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Alexander Danser Apr. 13, 2020
Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and the COVID-19 Pandemic

To the Editor

We appreciate the comments by Burrell et al. and we generally concur with them. We had stated correctly, as a take home message, that ACE2 normally circulates in blood at very low levels in both humans and mice.1-3 In pathophysiological conditions like cardiovascular disease, plasma ACE2 activity, however, increases significantly by a factor of 2-5 fold.2 Nevertheless, when starting at very low levels even a 5-fold increase in circulating ACE2 activity still reflects a minor portion of total ACE2 protein since most of it is membrane-bound.

We agree with Burrell et al. that an increase in plasma ACE2 activity may actually represent a decrease in membrane-bound ACE2. The precise contributions, to our knowledge, have not been quantitated experimentally. We stress that we also do not know if plasma ACE2 activity represents full-length ACE2 (molecular weight 120-130 kDa) or ‘soluble’ ACE2 (molecular weight 100-110 kDa or less).4 The latter, in our opinion, is the most likely but due to its very low plasma content one cannot detect bands corresponding to either form of ACE2 by western blot.3

One explanation for increased plasma ACE2 activity is that ACE2 is shed from the endothelium much the same way as ACE is. The main difference is that ACE is an endothelial enzyme whereas ACE2 is predominantly an epithelial enzyme. Under pathologic conditions, however, ACE2 may be overexpressed in endothelial cells and shed into the circulation thereby increasing soluble plasma ACE2 activity while membrane bound ACE2 is decreasing.

An increase in circulating ACE2 has been proposed as a marker of cardiovascular disease by Ramchand et al.2 and others. Actually a decrease in membrane-bound ACE2 (and not an increase in circulating ACE2 ) is what likely has a negative impact in cardiovascular disease. In other words, the more membrane-bound ACE2 and the less circulating ACE2, the better when it comes to vascular and tissue integrity.  For instance, increased expression of full length ACE2 in the vasculature of the mouse kidney after treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker might contribute to the protective effects of these drugs.5

Dan Batlle

Murray Epstein

A.H. Jan Danser


1. Danser AHJ, Epstein M, Batlle D. Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and the COVID-19 Pandemic: At Present There Is No Evidence to Abandon Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers. Hypertension. 2020:HYPERTENSIONAHA12015082.

2. Ramchand J, Patel SK, Kearney LG, et al. Plasma ACE2 Activity Predicts Mortality in Aortic Stenosis and Is Associated With Severe Myocardial Fibrosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:655-664.

3. Serfozo P, Wysocki J, Gulua G, et al. Ang II (Angiotensin II) Conversion to Angiotensin-(1-7) in the Circulation Is POP (Prolyloligopeptidase)-Dependent and ACE2 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2)-Independent. Hypertension. 2020;75:173-182.

4. Wysocki J, Batlle D. Reduced plasma ACE2 activity in dialysis patients: another piece in the conundrum of factors involved in hypertension and cardiovascular morbidity? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:2200-2202.

5. Soler MJ, Ye M, Wysocki J, et al. Localization of ACE2 in the renal vasculature: amplification by angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade using telmisartan. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296:F398-405.

Competing Interests
D. Batlle is a co-inventor of the patent ‘Active Low Molecular Weight Variants of ACE2’; and has also submitted a patent on the potential use of novel ACE2 proteins for coronavirus infection. D. Batlle is Founder of ‘Angiotensin Therapeutics’.
Sheila Patel Apr. 10, 2020
Response to: Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and the COVID-19 Pandemic. At Present There Is No Evidence to Abandon Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers

To the Editor

We agree with Danser1 and other colleagues2 that there is no evidence that treatment with renin angiotensin system blockers should be discontinued in patients, unless of course clinically indicated.  We wanted to draw out the authors on a ‘take home message’ that soluble ACE2 circulates in blood at ‘very low levels’. Whilst we have shown this is correct for healthy individuals,3 where the mean plasma ACE2 activity was 4.44 (range 1.3–8.7) pmol/ml/min, this is not the case in the  presence of cardiovascular disease. We reported in two prospective longitudinal studies in patients with coronary artery disease4 and aortic stenosis,5 that plasma ACE2 activity levels were significantly elevated compared to healthy individuals, and that elevated plasma ACE2 levels were an independent predictor of mortality. In patients with aortic stenosis,5 the median plasma ACE2 activity was 34.0 pmol/ml/min. In this study,5 we also reported on cardiac tissue ACE2 gene expression; we found that myocardial ACE2 gene expression was reduced, that reduced myocardial tissue ACE2 levels were associated with elevated circulating ACE2 activity, and that those with the highest plasma ACE2 activity had more severe myocardial fibrosis. These data support the hypothesis that an increase in soluble ACE2 may represent a decrease in membrane bound ACE2. How these changes relate to COVID-19 infection in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease remains to be determined.

Louise M Burrell1,2; Jay Ramchand1,2,3, Sheila K Patel1

1Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

2Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia

3Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Disclosures: none



1. Danser AHJ, Epstein M, Batlle D. Renin-angiotensin system blockers and the covid-19 pandemic: At present there is no evidence to abandon renin-angiotensin system blockers. Hypertension. 2020: Mar 25: Online ahead of print.

2. Sparks MA, South A, Welling P, Luther JM, Cohen J, Byrd JB, Burrell LM, Batlle D, Tomlinson L, Bhalla V, Rheault MN, Soler MJ, Swaminathan S, Hiremath S. Sound science before quick judgement regarding ras blockade in covid-19. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020: Online ahead of print.

3. Lew RA, Warner FJ, Hanchapola I, Yarski MA, Ramchand J, Burrell LM, Smith AI. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 catalytic activity in human plasma is masked by an endogenous inhibitor. Exp Physiol. 2008;93:685-693

4. Ramchand J, Patel SK, Srivastava PM, Farouque O, Burrell LM. Elevated plasma angiotensin converting enzyme 2 activity is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198144

5. Ramchand J, Patel SK, Kearney LG, Matalanis G, Farouque O, Srivastava PM, Burrell LM. Plasma ACE2 activity predicts mortality in aortic stenosis and is associated with severe myocardial fibrosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(3):655-664.

Competing Interests