Skip to main content

Abstract

Background

Hypertrophy of the left ventricle (LV) has recently been associated with adverse changes of brain structure in older adults, notably increased burden of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). Whether greater LV size or mass is also related to WMH burden in middle‐aged adults is currently unclear. In addition, its relation with alterations in cortical thickness (CT) has not been studied to date.

Methods and Results

Data from 1602 participants of the population‐based SHIP (Study of Health in Pomerania) with LV ejection fraction >40% and no history of myocardial infarction were included (aged 21–82 years; median age, 49 years; 53% women). Participants underwent both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head. Imaging markers of brain aging (ie, CT and WMH volume) were determined from magnetic resonance imaging scans. LV mass and diameter were associated with lower global CT and greater WMH volume, while adjusting for age, sex, body height, fat‐free body mass, and intracranial volume. Moreover, thicknesses of the interventricular septum and posterior wall were also associated with lower global CT. These associations could not be explained by cardiovascular risk factors (including hypertension), inflammatory markers, or sociodemographic factors. Regional analyses showed distinct spatial patterns of lower CT in association with LV diameter and posterior wall thickness.

Conclusions

LV diameter and mass are associated with lower global and regional CT as well as greater WMH burden in the general population. These findings highlight the brain structural underpinnings of the associations of LV hypertrophy with cognitive decline and dementia.

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

CT
cortical thickness
E/A
ratio of peak velocity blood flow in early diastole/peak velocity flow in late diastole
E/e’
ratio of early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity
LVD
left ventricular diameter during diastole
LVM
left ventricular mass
LVS
left ventricular diameter during systole
PWD
posterior wall thickness during diastole
RAAS
renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system
SHIP
Study of Health in Pomerania
WMH
white matter hyperintensity

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

Increased left ventricular diameter and mass were related to lower global and regional cortical thickness as well as greater white matter lesion burden in middle‐aged adults with preserved systolic function (ejection fraction >40%) and no history of myocardial infarction.
These associations could not be explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors or markers of systemic inflammation.
Our findings highlight the brain structural underpinnings of the previously reported associations of cardiac hypertrophy with cognitive decline and dementia.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Subclinical changes in cardiac structure may play an important role in the cause and, possibly, prevention of cognitive decline and dementia at an early stage.
Greater left ventricular (LV) diameter and LV mass (LVM) are well‐known risk factors for future cardiac events and mortality.1, 2 The adverse effects of cardiovascular diseases on brain structure have been studied extensively during the past decades. For example, patients with hypertension3, 4 and coronary artery disease5 show increased rates of white matter lesions and age‐related decline in gray matter volume compared with healthy individuals. The relationships of LV diameter and LVM with brain structures have only recently been explored.
In the SHS (Strong Hearth Study), LVM was associated with decreased hippocampal volume, greater white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), and impaired cognitive function after a mean follow‐up time of 17 years.6 This was confirmed by recent results from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study, showing that higher LVM and wall thickness are associated with greater volume of WMH and brain infarctions in elderly patients.7 Moreover, LV hypertrophy was related to increased risk of incident dementia.8 Similarly, greater LVM was related to compromised white matter microstructure in older adults with mild cognitive impairments.9
Evidence for the involvement of the cerebral cortex in the heart‐brain axis comes from cardiac diseases (eg, Takotsubo syndrome)10, 11 or stroke‐related myocardial injury.12 Stress‐induced chronic hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system causes dendritic atrophy in the prefrontal cortex and may render it almost completely dysfunctional in severe cases of posttraumatic stress disorder.13, 14 On the other hand, stress also causes LV hypertrophy via activation of the renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (RAAS),15 among others. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized LVM and other markers of LV hypertrophy to be associated with a lower cortical thickness (CT), typically observed in accelerated brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases.16, 17, 18 The frontal and somatosensory cortex are two candidate regions where abnormalities may be expected on the basis of the current understanding of the heart‐brain axis.19
Our analyses were based on data from 1602 participants of SHIP‐Trend (Study of Health in Pomerania Trend), a large‐scale, population‐based prospective cohort study in northeast Germany.20 Participants underwent both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head. CT and WMH volume were determined using automated image processing methods. We first studied the associations of CT and WMH volume with cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, high blood pressure [BP], and smoking), markers of systemic inflammation (CRP [C‐reactive protein], white blood cell count, and fibrinogen), and sociodemographic factors (living alone, income, and number of years of education). Second, we analyzed their associations with structural and functional echocardiographic parameters. Third, we assessed whether these associations could be explained by the above‐mentioned risk factors.21, 22, 23

Methods

Because of the sensitive nature of the data collected for this study, requests to access the data set from qualified researchers trained in human subject confidentiality protocols may be sent to “Forschungsverbund Community Medicine” ([email protected]).

Study Sample

SHIP (Study of Health in Pomerania) is a prospective population‐based cohort of adults from West Pomerania, a northeastern region in Germany of ≈220 000 inhabitants.20 The data used in our analyses were derived from SHIP‐Trend, a cohort initiated 10 years after SHIP in the same region. In brief, from the total population of West Pomerania, a 2‐stage stratified cluster sample of 8016 adults between the ages of 20 and 79 years was drawn. A total of 4420 individuals agreed to participate in the study. All participants gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Medicine Greifswald and complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Data used in our analyses come from the baseline examinations, which took place between 2008 and 2011.
A total of 1748 SHIP‐Trend participants received an echocardiography analysis, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and MRI of the head (Figure 1). Participants with LV ejection fraction <40% (N=14), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/(min×1.73 m2) (N=28; calculated on the basis of serum creatinine and cystatin c24), and self‐reported myocardial infarction (N=16) were excluded. In addition, participants who received MRI later than 1 year after echocardiography were excluded (N=16). Furthermore, an additional 78 participants were excluded because of structural abnormalities of the brain (eg, cysts and tumors), stroke, or poor scan quality after inspection by expert radiologists. The final study sample comprised data of 1602 participants. Details on data collection are provided in Data S1
image
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the selection of the study sample.
The study sample is based on the SHIP (Study of Health in Pomerania)‐Trend baseline examinations, which took place between 2008 and 2011. The final sample comprised 1602 adults from the population of West Pomerania, a northeastern region in Germany. MR indicates magnetic resonance; and MRI, MR imaging.

Statistical Analysis

As a first analysis, the correlation matrix of all exposures, outcomes, and potentially confounding parameters was calculated using the Pearson correlation. Global CT and WMH volume were the primary outcomes of the association analyses. Associations with cardiovascular risk factors (waist circumference, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, systolic BP, diastolic BP, ever smoking, and current smoking), inflammatory markers (CRP, fibrinogen, and white blood cell count), sociodemographic factors (living alone, equalized disposable income, and number of years of education), and echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular diameter during diastole [LVD], left ventricular diameter during systole [LVS], interventricular septal thickness during systole, interventricular septal thickness during diastole, posterior wall thickness during diastole [PWD], posterior wall thickness during systole, LVM, LV ejection fraction [LVEF], ratio of early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity [E/e′], and ratio of peak velocity blood flow in early diastole/peak velocity flow in late diastole [E/A]) (exposures) were studied by linear ordinary least squares regressions25 for each exposure separately, resulting in 2×23 regression models. All continuous and dichotomous variables (including the outcomes) were z‐transformed to 0 mean and unit variance. As the distribution of WMH volume is right skewed, normalization was performed using a log transformation.26 Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body height, and fat‐free mass, which are well known to be associated with echocardiographic parameters27, 28 and partly also with CT,17 by including them as control variables in the regression models. We also included the total intracranial volume of the head, which is well known to correlate with the size of brain structures.29 Finally, we also included the interaction of sex with age to account for differences in age‐related atrophy between men and women.30 The base models therefore comprised the control variables (age, sex, body height, fat‐free body mass, total intracranial volume, and the interaction of sex with age) and a single exposure variable. Continuous control variables were modeled by restricted cubic splines with 5 knots located at the 5%, 27.5%, 50%, 72.5%, and 95% quantiles to account for possible nonlinear relationships.25 Statistical effects of the exposures on the outcomes were assessed on the basis of the regression coefficients. In addition, we also considered Cohen f2 as a general measure of effect size (see Cohen,31 formula 9.2.3, page 410).
We examined whether the associations between outcomes and echocardiographic parameters can be explained by cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory marker, or sociodemographic variables. This was done by including them in the base models as additional control variables both individually and all together (extended models). Again, continuous risk factors were modeled by restricted cubic splines (see above). We investigated changes in the regression coefficients of the exposures by applying Z‐tests to the normalized differences, Image (equation/jah36634-math-0001.png) is missing or otherwise invalid. with β1 and β2 being the regression coefficients of the exposure within an extended model and the base model, respectively, and σ1 and σ2 denoting the corresponding SEs.32
Finally, we studied the associations of echocardiographic parameters with CT of 68 regions defined by the Desikan‐Killiany atlas33 (secondary outcomes). We used the Benjamini‐Hochberg method with false discovery rate ≤5% to account for multiple testing.34
Fulfillment of the statistical assumptions of ordinary least squares regression was checked by visual inspection of diagnostic plots. Cases with unusually large residuals were excluded from the analyses. All statistical analyses were performed with R version 4.0.3. Figures were created with the ggplot2 package in R and the freesurfer_statsurf_scalar package in MATLAB.

Results

Sample Characteristics

The characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The sample comprised 1602 participants from 21 to 82 years of age, with a median age of 49 years, and 53% (N=839) being women. Median body mass index was 26.6 kg/m². A total of 40.4% and 35.8% were never smokers and former smokers, respectively. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were present in 37.7% and 5.9%, respectively, of the study population.
Table 1. Sample Characteristics (N=1602)
 Value
Clinical variables
Women, %52.4
Age, y49 (40–59)
Smoking, %
Never40.4
Former35.8
Current23.8
Missing1
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg125 (113–136)
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg76 (70–83)
Hypertension, %37.7
Missing3
Diabetes mellitus, %5.9
Body measures
Body height, m1.70 (1.64–1.78)
Body mass, kg77.9 (68.0–88.7)
Body mass index, kg/m²26.7 (24.0–29.6)
Fat‐free body mass, kg54.5 (46.6–66.0)
Waist circumference, cm87.3 (78.5–96.6)
Missing2
Laboratory measurements
CRP, mg/L1.12 (0.60–2.28)
Missing80
White blood cell count, 109 cells/L5.49 (4.70–6.60)
Missing2
Fibrinogen, g/L2.9 (2.4–3.4)
Missing14
Sociodemography
Living alone, %24.6
Equivalized disposable income, €1450 (1096–1803)
Missing60
Education, y13 (11–15)
Missing15
Echocardiography
LVD, cm4.89 (4.55–5.24)
LVS, cm2.83 (2.54–3.15)
IVSD, cm1.01 (0.89–1.13)
IVSS, cm1.59 (1.38–1.81)
PWD, cm0.95 (0.85–1.07)
PWS, cm1.57 (1.39–1.78)
LVM, g172 (139–210)
LVEF, %72.3 (66.5–78.1)
E/e'5.8 (5.0–7.0)
Missing48
E/A1.13 (0.94–1.41)
Missing19
Brain imaging
Estimated total intracranial volume, L1.58 (1.47–1.70)
Mean cortical thickness, mm2.36 (2.27–2.42)
White matter hyperintensity volume, mm³149 (57–368)
Missing229
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Values are given as percentages or medians with CIs (25% and 75% quantiles). Hypertension was classified according to International Society of Hypertension–World Health Organization 1999 (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or intake of antihypertensive drugs). Diabetes mellitus was defined on the basis of self‐report, intake of antidiabetic medication (anatomical therapeutic chemical: A10), glycated hemoglobin ≥6.5%, or blood glucose levels ≥11.1 mmol/L. CRP indicates C‐reactive protein; E/A, ratio of peak velocity blood flow in early diastole/peak velocity flow in late diastole; E/e′, ratio between early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity; IVSD, intraventricular septum thickness during diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septum thickness during systole; LVD, left ventricular diameter during diastole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVS, left ventricular diameter during systole; PWD, posterior wall thickness during diastole; and PWS, posterior wall thickness during systole.

Echocardiographic Parameters

LV diameters and wall thicknesses (ie, posterior wall thickness and width of the interventricular septum) were highly correlated among each other (eg, r=0.61 for LVD and LVS), but correlations between both groups of parameters were small (eg, r=0.14 for LVD and PWD). Structural parameters were moderately or highly correlated with LVM (r=0.43 … 0.76). LVEF was more strongly related to structural parameters during systole (eg, r=−0.81 for LVS) than during diastole (eg, r=−0.05 for LVD). Parameters of diastolic function (E/e′ and E/A) were moderately positively and inversely, respectively, correlated with wall thicknesses both during systole and diastole but not with LV diameters. The complete correlation matrix of echocardiographic parameters, among others, is shown in Figure S1. The fraction of variance in echocardiographic parameters, explained by the control variables age, sex, body height, fat‐free body mass, and the interaction of sex and age, varied between 5.4% and 53% for LVEF and LVM, respectively. Adding interactions of sex with body height and fat‐free mass did not significantly improve the explained variance.

Associations of Global CT and WMH Volume With Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Inflammatory Markers, and Sociodemographic Factors

Global CT varied between 1.83 and 2.71 mm and lessened on average with age by 0.05 mm per decade. After regressing global CT on the control variables of the base model, we identified 6 cases with unusually large residuals that were excluded from subsequent analyses (Figure S2). The fraction of explained variance was 38%. Adding interactions of sex with total intracranial volume, body height, and fat‐free mass did not significantly improve the explained variance. Global CT was inversely associated with concentrations of CRP (β=−0.048; P=0.021), white blood cell count (β=−0.062; P=0.002), ever smoking (β=−0.056; P=0.007), and current smoking (β=−0.079; P=1.2e‐4). Global CT was positively associated with number of years of education (β=0.074; P=3.5e‐4) and equalized disposable income (β=0.052; P=0.014) while adjusting for the control variables of the base model. Regression coefficients and CIs are shown by Table 2. Combining the 2 dichotomous smoking variables into a single one (never/former/current) yielded an overall effect of f²=1.0%. Number of years of education exhibited the second strongest effect on global CT (f²=0.8%).
Table 2. Associations of Global CT With Echocardiographic Parameters, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Inflammatory Markers, and Sociodemographic Variables
VariableExposureBase modelExtended model
β(95% CI)P Valueβ(95% CI)P Value
Cardiovascular risk factorsWaist circumference−0.021(−0.092 to 0.049)5.45E‐01
 Diabetes mellitus−0.019(−0.059 to 0.021)3.43E‐01
 Hypertension−0.028(−0.074 to 0.018)2.20E‐01
 Systolic blood pressure−0.017(−0.065 to 0.031)4.83E‐01
 Diastolic blood pressure0.012(−0.032 to 0.057)5.81E‐01
 Ever smoking−0.056(−0.097 to −0.015)6.70E‐03
 Current smoking−0.079(−0.120 to −0.038)1.21E‐04
Inflammatory markersCRP−0.048(−0.089 to −0.007)2.08E‐02*
 White blood cell count−0.062(−0.102 to −0.022)1.81E‐03
 Fibrinogen−0.042(−0.085 to 0.002)5.43E‐02
SociodemographicsLiving alone−0.037(−0.078 to 0.003)6.74E‐02
 Equivalized disposable income0.052(0.010 to 0.095)1.39E‐02*
 Years of education0.074(0.033 to 0.115)3.57E‐04
EchocardiographyLVD−0.055(−0.103 to −0.007)2.47E‐02*−0.058(−0.109 to −0.006)2.91E‐02*
 LVS−0.046(−0.089 to −0.003)3.63E‐02*−0.026(−0.073 to 0.020)2.71E‐01
 IVSD−0.027(−0.072 to 0.018)2.34E‐01−0.008(−0.057 to 0.040)7.33E‐01
 IVSS−0.051(−0.098 to −0.005)2.95E‐02*−0.051(−0.100 to −0.002)4.23E‐02*
 PWD−0.090(−0.137 to −0.044)1.57E‐04−0.057(−0.109 to −0.006)2.89E‐02*
 PWS−0.032(−0.078 to 0.014)1.68E‐01−0.016(−0.065 to 0.033)5.11E‐01
 LVM−0.119(−0.175 to −0.062)3.93E‐05−0.095(−0.157 to −0.032)2.89E‐03
 LVEF0.019(−0.021 to 0.059)3.40E‐01−0.005(−0.048 to 0.037)8.03E‐01
 E/e′0.001(−0.045 to 0.046)9.82E‐010.025(−0.024 to 0.074)3.18E‐01
 E/A0.006(−0.044 to 0.056)8.09E‐010.018(−0.039 to 0.075)5.30E‐01
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Standardized regression coefficients with 95% CIs are given. Results are adjusted for age, sex, body height, fat‐free body mass, total intracranial volume, and the interaction of sex with age (base model). In addition, associations with echocardiographic parameters were also adjusted for all cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic variables (extended model). CRP indicates C‐reactive protein; CT, cortical thickness; E/A, ratio of peak velocity blood flow in early diastole/peak velocity flow in late diastole; E/e′, ratio between early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity; IVSD, intraventricular septum thickness during diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septum thickness during systole; LVD, left ventricular diameter during diastole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVS, left ventricular diameter during systole; PWD, posterior wall thickness during diastole; and PWS, posterior wall thickness during systole.
Significance levels: *P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001.
The distribution of WMH volume was right skewed, and a log transformation was applied for normalization. About 36% of WMH variance was explained by the control variables of the base model. Three cases were excluded from the subsequent analyses because of unusually large residuals (Figure S2). Adding interactions of sex with total intracranial volume, body height, and fat‐free mass did not significantly improve the explained variance. WMH volume was positively associated with hypertension (β=0.065; P=0.009), systolic BP (β=0.058; P=0.028), and ever smoking (β=0.049; P=0.027). Regression coefficients and CIs are shown by Table 3. The effect size of smoking status (never/former/current) was f²=0.4%. Hypertension exhibited the strongest effect on WMH volume (f²=0.5%). Results of sex‐stratified analyses are provided in Tables S1 and S2.
Table 3. Associations of WMH Volume With Echocardiographic Parameters, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Inflammatory Markers, and Sociodemographic Variables
VariableExposureBase modelExtended model
β(95% CI)P Valueβ(95% CI)P Value
Cardiovascular risk factorsWaist circumference−0.0381(−0.117 to 0.041)3.33E‐01
 Diabetes mellitus0.0056(−0.040 to 0.051)8.07E‐01
 Hypertension0.0653(0.015 to 0.116)9.71E‐03
 Systolic blood pressure0.0585(0.005 to 0.112)2.81E‐02*
 Diastolic blood pressure0.0318(−0.018 to 0.081)2.00E‐01
 Ever smoking0.0498(0.005 to 0.095)2.76E‐02*
 Current smoking0.0320(−0.013 to 0.077)1.58E‐01
Inflammatory markersCRP−0.0109(−0.054 to 0.032)6.15E‐01
 White blood cell count0.0154(−0.027 to 0.058)4.70E‐01
 Fibrinogen0.0225(−0.025 to 0.070)3.46E‐01
SociodemographicsLiving alone0.0171(−0.028 to 0.062)4.48E‐01
 Equivalized disposable income−0.0109(−0.057 to 0.036)6.41E‐01
 Years of education−0.0452(−0.091 to 0.001)5.01E‐02
EchocardiographyLVD0.067(0.014 to 0.121)1.31E‐02*0.080(0.021 to 0.138)7.69E‐03
 LVS0.040(−0.008 to 0.089)1.04E‐010.030(−0.023 to 0.083)2.71E‐01
 IVSD−0.010(−0.060 to 0.040)6.91E‐01−0.023(−0.079 to 0.033)4.16E‐01
 IVSS−0.011(−0.062 to 0.041)6.84E‐01−0.016(−0.072 to 0.040)5.77E‐01
 PWD0.040(−0.012 to 0.092)1.33E‐010.024(−0.034 to 0.083)4.17E‐01
 PWS0.034(−0.017 to 0.084)1.96E‐010.029(−0.026 to 0.085)2.99E‐01
 LVM0.071(0.008 to 0.134)2.71E‐02*0.067(−0.004 to 0.138)6.43E‐02
 LVEF−0.012(−0.056 to 0.033)5.99E‐010.005(−0.043 to 0.054)8.31E‐01
 E/e′0.010(−0.040 to 0.060)6.94E‐010.001(−0.054 to 0.057)9.60E‐01
 E/A0.057(0.002 to 0.112)4.30E‐02*0.057(−0.006 to 0.121)7.70E‐02
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Standardized regression coefficients with 95% CIs are given. Results are adjusted for age, sex, body height, fat‐free body mass, total intracranial volume, and the interaction of sex with age (base model). In addition, associations with echocardiographic parameters were also adjusted for all cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic variables (extended model). CRP indicates C‐reactive protein; E/A, ratio of peak velocity blood flow in early diastole/peak velocity flow in late diastole; E/e′, ratio between early mitral inflow velocity/mitral annular early diastolic velocity; IVSD, intraventricular septum thickness during diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septum thickness during systole; LVD, left ventricular diameter during diastole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass; LVS, left ventricular diameter during systole; PWD, posterior wall thickness during diastole; PWS, posterior wall thickness during systole; and WMH, white matter hyperintensity.
Significance levels: *P<0.05, P<0.01.

Associations of Global CT and WMH Volume With Echocardiographic Parameters

Global CT was inversely associated with LVD (β=−0.055; P=0.025), LVS (β=−0.046; P=0.036), interventricular septal thickness during systole (β=−0.051; P=0.030), PWD (β=−0.090; P=1.6e‐4), and LVM (β=−0.12; P=3.9e‐5) while adjusting for the control variables of the base model. There were no significant associations of global CT with any functional cardiac parameter. Regression coefficients and CIs are shown in Table 2. Global CT was most strongly associated with LVM (f²=1.1%) followed by PWD (f²=0.9%). Additional adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic factors, both individually and all together (extended models), did not significantly modify these associations (Z‐tests; |z|<0.94; Figure S3). Inclusion of CRP did weaken the association with PWD and therefore also with LVM marginally (z=−0.46 and z=−0.26, respectively). The association between global CT and LVS was marginally weaker when including income (z=−0.33). When adjusting for all risk factors together, the associations of global CT with LVD, interventricular septal thickness during systole, PWD, and LVM remained significant.
WMH volume was positively associated with LVD (β=0.067; P=0.013) and LVM (β=0.071; P=0.027), and inversely associated with E/A (β=0.057; P=0.043), while adjusting for the control variables of the base model. Regression coefficients and CIs are shown in Table 3. WMH volume was most strongly associated with LVD (f²=0.45%). Additional adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic factors, both individually and all together (extended models), did not significantly modify these associations (Z‐tests; |z|<0.51; Figure S4). The association with LVM and E/A became nonsignificant when adjusting for all risk factors (z=−0.07 and z=−0.03, respectively). Results of sex‐stratified analyses are provided in Tables S1 and S2.

Associations of Regional CT With Echocardiographic Parameters

We found consistent inverse associations of regional CT with LV structural parameters while adjusting for the control variables of the base model. Figure 2A shows a map of the cortical regions of the right hemisphere. In general, LVD was more strongly associated with thickness of the parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes, whereas PWD was more strongly related to thickness of the frontal lobe and cingulate cortex (Figure S5). LVM was most strongly related to regional CT, with significant associations in 50 of 68 regions after correction for multiple testing (false discovery rate ≤5%). There were no significant associations of regional CT with any functional cardiac parameter.
image
Figure 2. Associations of regional cortical thickness with left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVD), posterior wall thickness during diastole (PWD), and left ventricular mass (LVM) while adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic factors (extended model; right hemisphere only).
A, Each participant's cerebral cortex was parceled into 34 regions per hemisphere, according to the gyral‐based Desikan‐Killiany atlas. B, In addition to the control variables of the base model, we included cardiovascular risk factors (including hypertension), markers of systemic inflammation, and sociodemographic variables into the regression models of each cortical region. Standardized regression coefficients are shown. Labels are shown for those regions where associations remained significant after correction for multiple testing with the Benjamini‐Hochberg method (false discovery rate ≤5%). IT indicates inferior temporal gyrus; LIN, lingual cortex; LOCC, lateral occipital cortex; PSTS, postcentral gyrus; PTRI, pars triangularis; RMF, rostral middle frontal gyrus; SF, superior frontal gyrus; SMAR, supramarginal gyrus; and TT, transverse temporal cortex.
When additionally adjusting for all cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic variables, we found significant associations of LVD and PWD with CT of the right postcentral gyrus (β=−0.103; Padjusted=0.029) and right pars triangularis (β=−0.096; Padjusted= 0.045), respectively. LVM was most strongly related to regional CT, with significant associations in 13 of 64 regions, notably with the right pars triangularis (β=−0.151; Padjusted=7.3e‐4) and right postcentral gyrus (β=−0.125; Padjusted=0.015) (Figure 2B). Again, there were no significant associations with any functional cardiac parameter.
Maps of regression coefficients for all echocardiographic parameters and both hemispheres are shown in Figures S5 and S6.

Discussion

LV hypertrophy is ever more being recognized as a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia in elderly patients. Specifically, several previous studies have found that LV hypertrophy was associated with lower global and domain‐specific cognitive performance and a greater risk for dementia, independent of hypertension.8, 35, 36, 37 Cognitive decline during normal aging and in neurodegenerative diseases is a consequence of adverse changes in brain structure.38, 39, 40 We therefore hypothesized echocardiographic markers of LV hypertrophy to be related with CT and WMH burden in the general population. Although some previous studies found gray matter atrophy in association with greater LVM (eg, in the hippocampus),6 its associations with global and regional CT have not been investigated to date.
In accordance with previous studies, LV mass and diameter were positively associated with greater WMH volume in our general population sample.7, 41 Moreover, we found consistent inverse associations of LV structural but not functional echocardiographic parameters with both global and regional CT. LVM was most strongly associated with global CT, followed by PWD and LVD. LVD was more strongly associated with regions of the occipital, temporal, and parietal lobes, whereas PWD was more strongly associated with regions of the frontal and cingulate cortex. This is in line with previous studies reporting independent effects of concentric (ie, large LVM but normal diameter) and eccentric (ie, large LVD but normal mass) hypertrophy on incident dementia and cognitive function.36, 42 Recently, the association of increased LVM with compromised white matter microstructure in older adults free of dementia and heart failure has been reported.9 Fractional anisotropy was reduced in the right inferior frontal gyrus, among others. This not only supports our finding of spatially specific associations of LVM with CT but also matches the region that was most strongly associated with LVM in our analyses. In addition, both the somatosensory cortex (which is located in the postcentral gyrus) and the frontal cortex are hypothesized to play pivotal roles in neural control of the cardiovascular system.19
We examined the roles of various cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic factors. Associations of echocardiographic parameters with global CT and WHM volume could not be explained by any of these risk factors. For instance, LVM is generally driven by increased systolic BP.43 Yet, neither BP nor hypertension did significantly modify the association between LVM and global CT. Moreover, the associations were not significantly modified when additionally adjusting for smoking status and inflammatory markers, although they were strongly associated with CT themselves22, 44 (Figure 2B). This was also the case when controlling for all risk factors, thereby potentially suggesting an independent association of LVM with both global CT and WMH volume. We would like to highlight that the effect size of smoking status on global CT was about the same as the ones of LVD and PWD (f2≈1%).
We did not find an association of CT with systolic and diastolic cardiac function. This is in discrepancy with previous studies reporting inverse associations of systolic function with total brain volume in samples of older individuals.45, 46 There may be two reasons for this. First, none of the previous studies examined volume or thickness of the cerebral cortex in particular. Second, our sample comprised of middle‐aged individuals with preserved systolic function (LVEF >40%) and no history of myocardial infarction. Furthermore, one may assume that the adverse effects of poor cardiac function on the cerebral cortex become only apparent in older individuals or in individuals with impaired cardiac systolic function. This is supported by the fact that other studies in healthy individuals also have failed to find an association of LVEF with cognitive decline or risk of dementia in individuals free of cardiovascular disease and dementia.36
The potential biological mechanisms underlying the observed association between LV hypertrophy and thinner cerebral cortex are complex and remain to be fully understood. In general, the relation between the heart and the brain is bidirectional, with the brain influencing the heart (eg, in broken‐heart syndrome/Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), as well as the heart effecting the brain (eg, in embolic stroke).47 The strong association of LVM with CT in healthy middle‐aged adults observed herein might reflect a subclinical neurocardiological syndrome caused by stress‐induced chronic hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system. The latter is known to impair top‐down function of the prefrontal cortex because of catecholamine‐induced dendritic atrophy, with signs of prefrontal dysfunction in posttraumatic stress disorder.14 On the other hand, stress‐induced chronic hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is also known to increase LVM via activation of the RAAS.15 The RAAS plays a pivotal role in maintaining circulatory homeostasis. Aldosterone release from the adrenal cortex is stimulated by angiotensin II. This mineralocorticoid hormone induces greater renal sodium and water reabsorption, thereby influencing BP. Although the peripheral effects of the RAAS are well understood, there may also be other means of how the brain and the heart are connected through this system. For instance, salt‐sensitive rats develop hypertension when aldosterone is infused intracerebroventricularly, whereas the injection of spironolactone (mineral corticoid receptor antagonist) reverses this phenotype.48 Hyperaldosteronism is often present in depressed patients. Hence, the RAAS may partly explain why this patient group not only exhibits less CT but also has a greater risk for cardiovascular diseases.49, 50 Overall, previous studies highlight the important role of the RAAS as a potential link between LV hypertrophy and cortical thinning.
The present study has several limitations that need to be considered when interpreting the findings. First, echocardiography and MRI were assessed in a cross‐sectional setting. Consequently, causation cannot be implied. Second, although we adjusted for a variety of confounding factors, residual confounding attributable to other unmeasured factors cannot be ruled out. Third, our study included middle‐aged White Europeans, and results cannot be generalized to other age groups or races/ethnicities. Fourth, we would like to highlight that the individuals who participated in the MRI examination were not randomly drawn from the initial sample (n=4420) and were selected on the basis of examination‐specific inclusion criteria (eg, abdominal circumference not exceeding the MRI bore size). Nonetheless, the strengths of our study are the large study population and the inclusion of a variety of potential confounding variables.
In summary, we report associations of markers of LV hypertrophy with CT and WMH burden, independent from a wide range of cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers, and sociodemographic factors. Our findings are clinically relevant as they highlight that previously reported associations of LV hypertrophy with adverse changes in brain structure in elderly patients are already present in healthy middle‐aged adults.

Sources of Funding

SHIP (Study of Health in Pomerania) is part of the Community Medicine Research net (http://www.medizin.uni‐greifswald.de/icm) of the University of Greifswald, funded by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grants 01ZZ96030 and 01ZZ0701). The magnetic resonance images in SHIP and SHIP‐Trend were supported by a joint grant from Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany, and the Federal State of Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania. This study was further supported by the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, European Union Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research funding for BRIDGET (01ED1615), and National Institutes of Health grant AG059421.

Acknowledgments

Author contributions: S Frenzel and Dr Bahls designed the study. S Frenzel performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. S Frenzel, Dr Wittfeld, and Dr Habes processed the magnetic resonance imaging data. Drs Bülow, Völzke, Friedrich, Felix, Dörr, and Grabe contributed essentially to the data collection.

Footnote

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 10.

Supplemental Material

File (jah36634-sup-0001-data-tabs-figs.pdf)
Data S1
Tables S1–S3
Figures S1–S6

References

1.
Haider AW, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Increased left ventricular mass and hypertrophy are associated with increased risk for sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1454–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00407-0
2.
Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561–1566. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199005313222203
3.
de Leeuw F‐E, de Groot JC, Oudkerk M, Witteman JCM, Hofman A, van Gijn J, Breteler MMB. Hypertension and cerebral white matter lesions in a prospective cohort study. Brain. 2002;125:765–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf077
4.
Schaare HL, Kharabian Masouleh S, Beyer F, Kumral D, Uhlig M, Reinelt JD, Reiter AMF, Lampe L, Babayan A, Erbey M, et al. Association of peripheral blood pressure with gray matter volume in 19‐ to 40‐year‐old adults. Neurology. 2019;92:e758–e773. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006947
5.
Anazodo UC, Shoemaker JK, Suskin N, St. Lawrence KS. An investigation of changes in regional gray matter volume in cardiovascular disease patients, pre and post cardiovascular rehabilitation. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;3:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.09.011
6.
Haring B, Omidpanah A, Suchy‐Dicey AM, Best LG, Verney SP, Shibata DK, Cole SA, Ali T, Howard BV, Buchwald D, et al. Left ventricular mass, brain MRI and cognitive performance: results from the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2017;70:964–971.
7.
Johansen MC, Shah AM, Lirette ST, Griswold M, Mosley TH, Solomon SD, Gottesman RF. Associations of echocardiography markers and vascular brain lesions: the ARIC Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008992. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.008992
8.
Norby FL, Chen LY, Soliman EZ, Gottesman RF, Mosley TH, Alonso A. Association of left ventricular hypertrophy with cognitive decline and dementia risk over 20 years: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities‐Neurocognitive Study (ARIC‐NCS). Am Heart J. 2018;204:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.007
9.
Moore EE, Liu D, Pechman KR, Terry JG, Nair S, Cambronero FE, Bell SP, Gifford KA, Anderson AW, Hohman TJ, et al. Increased left ventricular mass index is associated with compromised white matter microstructure among older adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e009041. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009041
10.
Sabisz A, Treder N, Fijałkowska M, Sieminski M, Fijałkowska J, Naumczyk P, Nowak R, Jaguszewski M, Cwalina N, Gruchała M, et al. Brain resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with takotsubo cardiomyopathy an inseparable pair of brain and heart. Int J Cardiol. 2016;224:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.067
11.
Templin C, Hänggi J, Klein C, Topka MS, Hiestand T, Levinson RA, Jurisic S, Lüscher TF, Ghadri J‐R, Jäncke L. Altered limbic and autonomic processing supports brain‐heart axis in Takotsubo syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1183–1187. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz068
12.
Ay H, Koroshetz WJ, Benner T, Vangel MG, Melinosky C, Arsava EM, Ayata C, Zhu M, Schwamm LH, Sorensen AG. Neuroanatomic correlates of stroke‐related myocardial injury. Neurology. 2006;66:1325–1329. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000206077.13705.6d
13.
Liu R‐J, Aghajanian GK. Stress blunts serotonin‐ and hypocretin‐evoked EPSCs in prefrontal cortex: role of corticosterone‐mediated apical dendritic atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:359–364. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706679105
14.
Arnsten AFT, Raskind MA, Taylor FB, Connor DF. The effects of stress exposure on prefrontal cortex: translating basic research into successful treatments for post‐traumatic stress disorder. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.10.002
15.
Campos L, Bader M, Baltatu OC. Brain renin‐angiotensin system in hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and heart failure. Front Physiol. 2012;2:115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2011.00115
16.
Dickerson BC, Bakkour A, Salat DH, Feczko E, Pacheco J, Greve DN, Grodstein F, Wright CI, Blacker D, Rosas HD, et al. The cortical signature of Alzheimer’s disease: regionally specific cortical thinning relates to symptom severity in very mild to mild AD dementia and is detectable in asymptomatic amyloid‐positive individuals. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn113
17.
Salat DH, Buckner RL, Snyder AZ, Greve DN, Desikan RSR, Busa E, Morris JC, Dale AM, Fischl B. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:721–730. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh032
18.
Weihs A, Frenzel S, Wittfeld K, Obst A, Stubbe B, Habes M, Szentkirályi A, Berger K, Fietze I, Penzel T, et al. Associations between sleep apnea and advanced brain aging in a large‐scale population study. Sleep. 2021;44:zsaa204. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa204
19.
Tahsili‐Fahadan P, Geocadin RG. Heart‐brain axis. Circ Res. 2017;120:559–572. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308446
20.
Volzke H, Alte D, Schmidt CO, Radke D, Lorbeer R, Friedrich N, Aumann N, Lau K, Piontek M, Born G, et al. Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:294–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp394
21.
Cox SR, Lyall DM, Ritchie SJ, Bastin ME, Harris MA, Buchanan CR, Fawns‐Ritchie C, Barbu MC, de Nooij L, Reus LM, et al. Associations between vascular risk factors and brain MRI indices in UK Biobank. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:2290–2300. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz100
22.
Janowitz D, Habes M, Toledo JB, Hannemann A, Frenzel S, Terock J, Davatzikos C, Hoffmann W, Grabe HJ. Inflammatory markers and imaging patterns of advanced brain aging in the general population. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020;14:1108–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00058-y
23.
Salles GF, Roberto F, Cardoso Claudia RL, Muxfeldt ES. Relation of left ventricular hypertrophy with systemic inflammation and endothelial damage in resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2007;50:723–728. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.093120
24.
Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1114248
25.
Harrell F. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer International Publishing; 2015. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319194240. Accessed October 11, 2019.
26.
Heinen R, Steenwijk MD, Barkhof F, Biesbroek JM, van der Flier WM, Kuijf HJ, Prins ND, Vrenken H, Biessels GJ, de Bresser J. Performance of five automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation methods in a multicenter dataset. Sci Rep. 2019;9:16742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52966-0
27.
Bella JN, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, O’Grady MJ, Welty TK, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV. Relations of left ventricular mass to fat‐free and adipose body mass. Circulation. 1998;98:2538–2544. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.98.23.2538
28.
Markus MRP, Werner N, Schipf S, Siewert‐Markus U, Bahls M, Baumeister SE, Völzke H, Felix SB, Ittermann T, Dörr M. Changes in body weight and composition are associated with changes in left ventricular geometry and function in the general population. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e005544. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005544
29.
Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SMD, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, Clarkson MJ, MacManus DG, Ourselin S, Fox NC. Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage. 2010;53:1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.025
30.
Cowell PE, Turetsky BI, Gur RC, Grossman RI, Shtasel DL, Gur RE. Sex differences in aging of the human frontal and temporal lobes. J Neurosci. 1994;14:4748–4755. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-08-04748.1994
31.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge; 2013:1–689.
32.
Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Am J Sociol. 1995;100:1261–1293. https://doi.org/10.1086/230638
33.
Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Buckner RL, Dale AM, Maguire RP, Hyman BT, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021
34.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B (Methodol). 1995;57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
35.
Georgakis MK, Synetos A, Mihas C, Karalexi MA, Tousoulis D, Seshadri S, Petridou ET. Left ventricular hypertrophy in association with cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hypertens Res. 2017;40:696–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2017.11
36.
Moazzami K, Ostovaneh MR, Ambale Venkatesh B, Habibi M, Yoneyama K, Wu C, Liu K, Pimenta I, Fitzpatrick A, Shea S, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Hypertension. 2018;71:429–436. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10289
37.
Restrepo C, Patel SK, Rethnam V, Werden E, Ramchand J, Churilov L, Burrell LM, Brodtmann A. Left ventricular hypertrophy and cognitive function: a systematic review. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-017-0023-0
38.
Dickerson BC, Fenstermacher E, Salat DH, Wolk DA, Maguire RP, Desikan R, Pacheco J, Quinn BT, Van der Kouwe A, Greve DN, et al. Detection of cortical thickness correlates of cognitive performance: reliability across MRI scan sessions, scanners, and field strengths. Neuroimage. 2008;39:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.042
39.
Rizvi B, Narkhede A, Last BS, Budge M, Tosto G, Manly JJ, Schupf N, Mayeux R, Brickman AM. The effect of white matter hyperintensities on cognition is mediated by cortical atrophy. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;64:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.12.006
40.
Smith CD, Chebrolu H, Wekstein DR, Schmitt FA, Jicha GA, Cooper G, Markesbery WR. Brain structural alterations before mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2007;68:1268–1273. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000259542.54830.34
41.
Nakanishi K, Jin Z, Homma S, Elkind MSV, Rundek T, Tugcu A, Yoshita M, DeCarli C, Wright CB, Sacco RL, et al. Left ventricular mass‐geometry and silent cerebrovascular disease: the Cardiovascular Abnormalities and Brain Lesions (CABL) study. Am Heart J. 2017;185:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.11.010
42.
Carabello BA. Concentric versus eccentric remodeling. J Card Fail. 2002;8:S258–S263. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2002.129250
43.
Missault LH, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer DD, Duprez DD, Clement DL. Relationship between left ventricular mass and blood pressure in treated hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001295
44.
Karama S, Ducharme S, Corley J, Chouinard‐Decorte F, Starr JM, Wardlaw JM, Bastin ME, Deary IJ. Cigarette smoking and thinning of the brain’s cortex. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:778–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.187
45.
Jefferson AL, Himali JJ, Beiser AS, Au R, Massaro JM, Seshadri S, Gona P, Salton CJ, DeCarli C, O'Donnell CJ, et al. Cardiac index is associated with brain aging: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2010;122:690–697. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.905091
46.
Park CM, Williams ED, Chaturvedi N, Tillin T, Stewart RJ, Richards M, Shibata D, Mayet J, Hughes AD. Associations between left ventricular dysfunction and brain structure and function: findings from the SABRE (Southall and Brent Revisited) Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e004898. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004898
47.
Daemen MJAP. The heart and the brain: an intimate and underestimated relation. Neth Heart J. 2013;21:53–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-012-0371-x
48.
Huang BS, White RA, Jeng AY, Leenen FHH. Role of central nervous system aldosterone synthase and mineralocorticoid receptors in salt‐induced hypertension in Dahl salt‐sensitive rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;296:R994–R1000. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.90903.2008
49.
Emanuele E, Geroldi D, Minoretti P, Coen E, Politi P. Increased plasma aldosterone in patients with clinical depression. Arch Med Res. 2005;36:544–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.03.046
50.
Schmaal L, Hibar DP, Sämann PG, Hall GB, Baune BT, Jahanshad N, Cheung JW, van Erp TGM, Bos D, Ikram MA, et al. Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:900–909. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.60

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association
PubMed: 34465186

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 22 January 2021
Accepted: 6 July 2021
Published online: 1 September 2021
Published in print: 7 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. brain imaging
  2. epidemiology
  3. left ventricular hypertrophy

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Katharina Wittfeld, PhD
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), Partner Site Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Henry Völzke, MD
Institute for Community Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Nele Friedrich, PhD
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Neuroimage Analytics Laboratory (NAL) and the Biggs Institute Neuroimaging Core (BINC) Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio (UTHSCSA) San Antonio TX
Stephan B. Felix, MD
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Department of Internal Medicine B University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Department of Internal Medicine B University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Hans J. Grabe, MD
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany
German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), Partner Site Rostock/Greifswald Greifswald Germany
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald Greifswald Germany
Department of Internal Medicine B University Medicine Greifswald Greifswald Germany

Notes

*
Correspondence to: Stefan Frenzel, MSc, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1‐2, 17475 Greifswald, Germany. E‐mail: [email protected]

Disclosures

Dr Grabe has received travel grants and speaker's honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, Neuraxpharm, Servier, and Janssen Cilag; as well as research funding from Fresenius Medical Care. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Funding Information

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research: 01ZZ96030, 01ZZ0701
Siemens Healthineers
Federal State of Mecklenburg–Western Pomerania
Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research: 01ED1615

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Cognitive Outcomes in Young Adults with Primary Arterial Hypertension: The Role of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage, Medicina, 60, 8, (1353), (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081353
    Crossref
  2. Differential associations between abnormal cardiac left ventricular geometry types and cerebral white matter disease, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 33, 6, (107709), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107709
    Crossref
  3. Associations of plasma proteomics and age-related outcomes with brain age in a diverse cohort, GeroScience, 46, 4, (3861-3873), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-024-01112-4
    Crossref
  4. Left ventricular hypertrophy as a risk factor for accelerated brain aging: Results from the Study of Health in Pomerania , Human Brain Mapping, 45, 3, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26567
    Crossref
  5. Evaluating heart rate variability with 10 second multichannel electrocardiograms in a large population-based sample, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10, (2023).https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1144191
    Crossref
  6. Cerebral white matter rarefaction has both neurodegenerative and vascular causes and may primarily be a distal axonopathy, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 82, 6, (457-466), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlad026
    Crossref
  7. The Systemic Effects of Exercise on the Systemic Effects of Alzheimer’s Disease, Antioxidants, 11, 5, (1028), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11051028
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response