Skip to main content

Abstract

Background

HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in high‐income countries. The authors studied the longitudinal association between HIV and ART and nonlaboratory Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in a middle‐income country.

Methods and Results

This longitudinal analysis of the NCS (Ndlovu Cohort Study), South Africa used baseline to 36‐month follow‐up data. Demographics, HIV, ART status, and cardiometabolic measures were obtained. FRS was used as a CVD risk measure. Through linear mixed models, FRS trends over time and the association with HIV were studied. Analysis included 1136 participants, with 609 (54%) having HIV, and 495 (81%) taking ART. At baseline, 9.8% of participants had a high FRS. People living with HIV (PLHIV) had a 3.2% lower FRS than HIV‐negative participants (P<0.001). FRS increased similarly for both groups over time. Other factors associated with FRS were secondary and higher education (ß value: −0.075, P<0.001; ß value: −0.084, P<0.001) and alcohol consumption (ß value: 0.011, P<0.001).

Conclusions

CVD risk increased for all participants over 36 months, suggesting classic risk factors rather than HIV status or ART to be drivers of CVD risk. People living with HIV had a significantly lower FRS than their HIV‐negative counterparts, possibly related to HIV itself or a more frequent interaction with healthcare services. No association of HIV and ART with changes in FRS over 36 months was observed, suggesting the need for research using clinical endpoints to elucidate the effects of HIV and ART on CVD risk. Population‐based prevention of CVD risk factors in sub‐Saharan Africa is warranted, regardless of HIV status.

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

FRS
Framingham Risk Score
IPAQ
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
NCS
Ndlovu Cohort Study
NIDS
National Income Dynamics Study
PLHIV
people living with HIV
SSA
sub‐Saharan Africa
STEPS
STEPwise approach to surveillance
WHO
World Health Organization

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

This study showed a longitudinal increase in cardiovascular disease risk in a rural South African population for both people living with HIV and the HIV‐negative population.
Baseline cardiovascular disease risk was higher for the HIV‐negative population compared with people living with HIV.
HIV and antiretroviral therapy were not associated with changes in Framingham Risk Score over 36 months, suggesting the need for research using clinical end points to elucidate the effects of HIV and antiretroviral therapy on cardiovascular disease risk.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Population‐based prevention of cardiovascular disease risk factors in sub‐Saharan Africa is warranted, regardless of HIV status.
In 2021, ≈38.4 million people worldwide were living with HIV.1 Even though antiretroviral therapy (ART) has significantly increased the life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLHIV), in 2021 alone, as many as 650 000 people died from AIDS‐related illnesses. Sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) shoulders the biggest burden (more than two‐thirds) of HIV infections worldwide. In 2021, at least 78% of the PLHIV in SSA had access to ART.1
Currently, a composite of communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases are the number 1 cause of death in SSA, followed by noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), which account for ≈35% of all deaths.2 With the increasing treatment coverage for HIV and rapid changes in lifestyle resulting from economic growth and globalization in SSA, the burden of NCDs is rapidly rising.3, 4 Of the NCDs, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the primary cause of death worldwide.5 In 2019, >1 million deaths were caused by CVDs in SSA, thereby contributing to ≈5.4% of CVD deaths worldwide.6 With the ongoing fall of communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases, >50% of all deaths in SSA are projected to be attributed to NCDs by 2030, with CVDs as the most common cause of death for NCDs.2 This epidemiological shift in SSA calls for thorough investigation of the growing burden of CVDs to advance the needed interventions and aid the formulation of policy.7
With current ART, PLHIV are living longer and experiencing a rise in CVD burden.8, 9, 10 The number of disability‐adjusted life‐years attributed to CVD associated with HIV status has tripled over the past 2 decades.10 An increased risk of CVDs has been mainly shown in PLHIV in high‐income countries,11, 12, 13, 14 suggesting that either the immune activation due to the (suppressed) chronic HIV infection or the antiretroviral medication is linked to the reported increased risk.10, 15 The high prevalence of HIV in SSA could therefore further increase CVD, emphasizing the need for further studies to elucidate the relationship between HIV, ART, and CVDs, thereby taking into consideration changes in cardiovascular risk factors at the population level in SSA, including HIV‐infected populations.11
Cardiovascular risk assessment and treatment can improve disease prevention and CVD outcomes.16, 17 The estimation of each individual's CVD risk allows for stratification into risk categories, which enables health care workers to recommend appropriate measures. Furthermore, absolute CVD risks, shown as a percentage, are easier for the patient to interpret and aid in increasing CVD awareness, as well as treatment adherence as opposed to relative risks.18
Traditional CVD risk factors include smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, low physical activity, and poor diet.2, 18, 19 Risk factors can be combined into a multivariable CVD risk model, used to estimate absolute CVD risk. The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) includes age, total cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (BP), antihypertensive medication, current smoking, and diabetes.20, 21 For use in primary health care in resource‐limited settings,22 a simpler, nonlaboratory FRS has been developed without the necessity for laboratory testing.21 Total and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol are replaced by body mass index (BMI) in the nonlaboratory FRS.21 Several cross‐sectional studies in SSA have shown good agreement between nonlaboratory FRS with laboratory FRS as well as other standard risk scores for both individuals with and without HIV.23, 24, 25
This study aims to assess trends in the nonlaboratory FRS (denoted as FRS) over a 36‐month period and to assess the association between FRS and HIV status and ART in a rural South African population.

Methods

Study Setting and Population

Data were collected as part of the NCS (Ndlovu Cohort Study), a prospective cohort study in a rural area, in Elandsdoorn, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Baseline assessment of the NCS was undertaken from November 2014 to August 2017. Both HIV‐negative and HIV‐positive participants were recruited at local events. All underwent HIV testing on enrollment and those who tested positive were consequently enrolled in the HIV‐positive group. Next to this, participants were recruited at the local clinic (Ndlovu Medical Center), both at the HIV treatment facility as well as at the general clinic. The majority of HIV‐positive participants, especially those taking ART at enrollment, were enrolled from the HIV clinic.26 Overall, 1927 participants were included in the study, among which 46% (887) were PLHIV, and 55% (1056) were women. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, ability to give written informed consent, and intent of long‐term follow‐up. Ethical approval for the NCS was given by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Pretoria in South Africa and the Limpopo Department of Health Ethics Committee. A more detailed description of the design and methods of the NCS has been previously published.26

Measurements

After the baseline assessment, participants were called 6 months later and yearly thereafter to inquire about medical conditions, medication use, and lifestyle characteristics.26 Participants were also invited to the research center annually for follow‐up questionnaires and physical measurements.
Information was obtained on general characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, HIV status, and ART. These were collected through questionnaires and included age, sex, demographics, and socioeconomic status. The 2012 NIDS (National Income Dynamics Study) Wave 3 Adults Questionnaire was used to assess employment and revenue.27 Physical activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).28 Employment was categorized as employed/unemployed, where the unemployed category included participants who identified as students, disabled or retired people, and volunteers. Cardiovascular risk factors including family history of CVD, alcohol use, and smoking were assessed by use of the World Health Organization (WHO) STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS) instrument.29 Participants were considered to have a positive family history of CVD when a first‐degree relative had experienced a stroke and/or heart attack younger than 60 years. A medical history and information on chronic medication use was collected, including diabetes and hypertension treatment.
Anthropometric measurements included height (cm) and weight (kg). Height was measured using a fixed stadiometer. Height and weight were used to calculate BMI as weight (kg)/height (m)2. BMI category cutoffs were based on WHO guidelines: underweight (BMI <18.5), normal weight (18.5 ≤BMI <25), overweight (25≤ BMI <30), and obese (BMI ≥30).30
BP was measured 3‐fold after a 5‐minute rest with a sphygmomanometer device. The average of the second and third measurements was used for further analysis. The measurements were taken on both arms and repeated on the arm resulting in the highest values.31
Participants were invited to come to the research site while fasting and blood samples were drawn at baseline and used to determine fasting lipids and glucose levels, HIV viral load, and CD4+ cell counts. Participants were indicated to have diabetes if either their glucose levels were ≥11.1 mmol/L, or their glycated hemoglobin (average blood sugar levels for the past 2 to 3 months) was ≥6.5%, or by the use of medication to lower blood glucose levels.32, 33 Blood samples were analyzed within 2 days at a certified laboratory (TogaLabs). In addition, viral load and CD4+ were obtained at each follow‐up visit to the NCS research center.
All participants who were HIV‐negative or had an unknown HIV status underwent HIV testing on enrollment and at each follow‐up visit using an antibody‐based point‐of‐care test. Positive tests were confirmed with a second, different, point‐of‐care test according to the Department of Health guidelines.26, 31 ART treatment status was assessed by self‐report and complemented with data from the electronic HIV registry (TIER.net).26 TIER.net is an HIV and tuberculosis monitoring system developed to harmonize disease registration and treatment processes in low‐ and middle‐income countries.34 Details regarding ART treatment such as time between diagnosis and treatment initiation and which medications were prescribed were recorded.26 If only the year of HIV diagnosis and/or treatment initiation was known, the date was set to July 1. If only the date of start of HIV diagnosis was unknown, the date was set to the start date of HIV treatment. Furthermore, treatment responses were measured through plasma viral loads and CD4 counts.

Cardiovascular Risk Profile

Nonlaboratory FRS was used to estimate 10‐year CVD risk.21 The FRS was originally geared towards a population between the ages of 30 and 74 years. The FRS can be categorized into low (<10%), medium (10%–20%), and high risk (>20%). Table S1 provides the respective weights of each risk factor to estimate the FRS for men and women separately.

Data Analysis

Data for analysis comprised all participants enrolled in the study at baseline and attending at least one of the follow‐up time points. A comparison between the analytic sample (n=1591) and the population lost to follow‐up (n=336) is shown in Table S2. After exclusion of individuals lost to follow‐up (n=336), the data set consisted of 1591 participants, with on average between 3 and 4 time points per individual. Baseline descriptive statistics separated by HIV status are shown in Table S3. Considering that the FRS was developed for a population aged between 30 and 74 years, all participants outside of that range at baseline were removed from the data set (n=455). The final data set for analysis comprised 1136 participants (Figure 1).
image
Figure 1. Flow chart for patient exclusion.
Excluded patients were removed from all time points for analysis.
Continuous population characteristics with a normal distribution are reported as mean and SD, whereas skewed data are shown using medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Categorical variables are represented with numbers and percentages. The nonlaboratory FRS was calculated for each participant at each time point according to D'Agostino et al.21
The distribution of low (<10%), medium (10%–20%), and high (>20%) 10‐year CVD risk is shown using frequency counts and percentages between baseline and the end of the 36‐month follow‐up period.35 Subsequently, average FRS per HIV group (positive versus negative) and HIV subgroup (HIV‐negative, HIV‐positive taking ART, HIV ART‐naïve) were compared over time to investigate the association between HIV, ART, and FRS over time. The Kruskal‐Wallis test was used to test for differences between the HIV (sub)groups at each time point, followed by a pairwise comparison using Wilcoxon rank sum test.
A linear mixed effects model with a random intercept and a random slope per participant was used to fit the data to account for baseline differences and different rates of change in logarithmic FRS over time, respectively. A logarithmic transformation of the FRS was used to correct for a skewed distribution of the FRS. An interaction between time point and HIV group was added to allow the effect of time to differ between HIV groups. The model was adjusted for known confounders of CVD risk and mortality: alcohol consumption, employment, education, and physical activity.36 These were tested as categorical covariates with a bivariate variable for employment and alcohol consumption: yes or no; 3 levels for physical activity: low, moderate, and high; and 4 levels for educational attainment: none, primary, secondary or matric, or college or university. Model selection was based on the Akaike information criterion and run in R Studio version 1.4.1106 (Posit Software).
To assess FRS trends over time, 2 approaches were used to categorize the population: (1) according to HIV status (HIV positive, HIV negative) and (2) according to ART treatment (HIV negative, HIV positive on ART, HIV positive, and ART naïve). Classification into the different groups was based on self‐reported treatment and updated by use of information recorded in TIER.net, as described in Vos et al (2020).31 These classifications were flexible over time, meaning that the participants could change between treatment groups between follow‐up time points. The final models for both approaches were estimated using maximum likelihood. The fixed effects for the models were: HIV (sub)group, visit (as categorical), an interaction between HIV (sub)group and visit, education, employment, and alcohol consumption over the past 30 days. The reference category was the HIV‐negative group, at baseline, without education, without employment, and no alcohol consumption over the past 30 days. Results are presented as back transformed (from logarithmic‐transformed dependent variable) regression coefficients with 95% CIs and marginal means. A 2‐sided P value ≤0.05 was considered significant. R Studio version 1.4.1106 was used for all data analysis and visualization.37
Between January 1, 2016 and November 31, 2017, BP measurements were obtained by use of a nonvalidated wrist device, which resulted in ≈52% of nonstandard BP measurements. This included 41% and 97% of BP measurements for baseline and 12‐month follow‐up, respectively. Due to the high percentage of nonstandard measurements for 12‐month follow‐up, this time point was completely removed from the analysis. For all other population characteristics and HIV‐related variables, percentage missing data was ≤0.1% missing, except for the variables categorical income per month (under the poverty line, which is defined as <648 South African Rand31), alcohol use in the past 30 days, glycated hemoglobin levels, and total cholesterol, which had 6.5%, 17.3%, 24.6%, and 0.7% missing values, respectively. Linear mixed models were built based on a reduced number of observations, without imputation of the missing data.
Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Results

Baseline population characteristics for the 1136 study participants (56% women; average age, 45 years [SD, 9.5 years]) are shown in Table 1. The average BMI at baseline was 25 kg/m2 (SD, 6.5 kg/m2). The mean systolic BP was 121 mm Hg (SD, 23.4 mm Hg). Smoking was reported by 481 participants (42%), of whom 324 (67%) were current smokers. A positive family history for CVD was indicated by 2.8% of the population. Alcohol consumption during the preceding 30 days was reported by 355 (31%) of the participants. At baseline, the number of participants per HIV treatment category was 527 (46%) HIV‐negative, 114 (10%) HIV‐positive and ART‐naïve, and 444 (39%) HIV‐positive taking ART. PLHIV taking first‐ and second‐line ART were merged due to the small number of participants taking second‐line ART (n=51). A comparison of baseline population characteristics showed significant differences between PLHIV and the HIV negative population for the variables age, sex, education, employment, relationship, smoking, and family history of CVD. Both groups were compared using Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher exact test for continuous and categorical data, respectively (Table S3). Table 2 shows baseline characteristics acquired through medical assessment per HIV subgroup. For PLHIV, the median CD4 cell count at baseline was 585 (IQR, 384–764). Of the participants living with HIV, 413 (68%) had an undetectable viral load (<50 copies/mL).
Table 1. Study Population Characteristics at Baseline (n=1136) in the NCS—South Africa
VariableDistribution
Demographics and socioeconomic background
Age, mean (SD), y45 (9.51)
Women, No. (%)638 (56.2)
Highest level of education
None, No. (%)61 (5.4)
Primary303 (26.7)
Secondary and matric676 (59.5)
College and university96 (8.4)
Employment
Unemployed, No. (%)839 (73.9)
Employed297 (26.1)
Income per person/mo in ZAR*
<648749 (65.9)
648–99287 (7.6)
>992300 (26.9)
Stable relationship (married, life partner, cohabiting)685 (60.3)
Cardiovascular risk factors
Alcohol use, ever729 (64.2)
Alcohol use, past 30 d355 (31.3)
Smoking
Ever481 (42.3)
Current324 (28.5)
Cigarettes/cigars per day, median (IQR)0 (0–2)
Positive family history for CVD32 (2.8)
Physical activity, MET‐min/wk
Low488 (43.0)
Moderate401 (35.3)
High247 (21.7)
CVD indicates cardiovascular disease; NCS, Ndlovu Cohort Study; IQR, interquartile range; and ZAR, South African Rand.
*
Lower bound poverty line: <648, upper bound poverty line: >992, as defined at baseline.27
The metabolic equivalent task (MET)‐min/wk is a weighted average calculated by average duration×frequency per week×intensity (MET) summed for all physical activity domains. MET is a measure for intensity of physical activity that enables comparison of different types of exercise/movement. MET‐min/wk are categorized into low, moderate, and high categories for respective values of <600 MET‐min/wk, 600–3000 MET‐min/wk, and >3000 MET‐min/wk.
Table 2. HIV‐Related Population Characteristics at Baseline in the NCS—South Africa
VariableHIV‐negative (n=527)ART‐naïve (n=114)HIV‐positive, taking ART (n=495)
Physical examination
Average systolic BP, mean (SD), mm Hg*128 (24.9)120 (22.3)115 (19.9)
Average diastolic BP, mean (SD), mm Hg*80 (14.1)78 (13.2)74 (13.0)
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m226.4 (6.7)24.0 (6.7)23.8 (5.8)
Waist circumference, mean (SD), cm87.8 (13.6)84.1 (13.6)85.5 (12.4)
Hip circumference mean (SD), cm102.9 (14.4)100.6 (15.2)99.9 (13.6)
Laboratory analysis
Fasting glucose, mean (SD), mmol/L5.50 (3.47)4.72 (0.90)4.90 (1.17)
Glycated hemoglobin, mean (SD), %5.81 (1.18)5.55 (0.39)5.62 (0.62)
Total cholesterol, median (SD), mmol/L4.5 (1.06)4.0 (0.94)4.4 (0.98)
Nonlaboratory FRS
Median FRS (IQR), %6.4 (2.6–13.2)3.5 (1.6–7.0)3.2 (1.3–7.3)
HIV‐related characteristics
Time since HIV diagnosis, mean (SD), mo 15 (36.3)78 (50.7)
Newly diagnosed at enrollment, No. (%) 82 (72)0 (0.0)
Time on ART, median (SD), mo 0 (0.2)64 (44.1)
CD4+ cell count, cells/mm3, mean (SD) 445 (273)528 (248)
CD4+ <200 cells/mm3, No. (%) 22 (19.3)36 (7.3)
Viral load, copies/mL, No. (%)
<50 24 (21.1)389 (78.6)
50–1000 18 (15.8)44 (8.9)
>1000 71 (62.3)56 (11.3)
ART indicates antiretroviral therapy; BMI, body mass index; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; IQR, interquartile range and NCS, Ndlovu Cohort Study.
*
All of the blood pressure (BP) measurements were taken; however, 41.3% of these were with a nonvalidated device.

FRS at Baseline and Over Time

At baseline, 75%, 16%, and 9% of the participants were at low, medium, and high CVD risk, respectively. The median FRS for the entire population at baseline was 0.044 (IQR, 0.018–0.101). Median FRS for the complete population changed from 0.044 to 0.060 during the follow‐up period. No changes in the distribution over the FRS categories over time were observed (Figure 2).
image
Figure 2. Distribution Framingham Risk Score (FRS) risk categories in the Ndlovu Cohort Study according to HIV status over time.
Low, medium, and high FRS are categorized by FRS values of <10%, 10% to 20%, and >20%, respectively. PLHIV indicates people living with HIV.

FRS by HIV Groups Over Time

A comparison of the stratified median FRS by HIV status (PLHIV versus HIV‐negative population) showed no change in FRS over time by group. The median FRS from baseline to 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up was 3.2% (IQR, 5.9%), 4.2% (IQR, 6.8%), and 3.9% (IQR, 6.3%) for the HIV‐positive group, respectively. For the HIV‐negative group, these values were 6.4% (IQR, 10.7%), 8.0% (IQR, 10.6%), and 8.4% (IQR, 10.7%), respectively (Figure 3). However, the linear mixed model results did show a significant increase of FRS over time, when corrected for other covariates (Table 3). The HIV‐positive group had roughly a 50% lower median FRS at each time point compared with the HIV‐negative group (Kruskal‐Wallis test, P≤0.05) (Figure 3).
image
Figure 3. Median Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for people living with HIV (PLHIV) and those who are HIV‐negative from baseline to 36‐month follow‐up in the Ndlovu Cohort Study, South Africa.
Statistical significance for the difference in FRS between HIV groups at each time point was tested using the Kruskal‐Wallis test. * P>0.05; ** P≤0.05.
Table 3. Results From the Multivariable Linear Mixed Model Showing Estimates for FRS in Relation to Time, HIV Status, Education, Alcohol Consumption, and Employment
Fixed effects
 Regression coefficient (95% CI)P value*
Intercept0.095 (0.072–0.123)<0.001
Time point
BaselineReference 
Follow up visit at 24 mo1.362 (1.291–1.437)<0.001
Follow up visit at 36 mo1.345 (1.271–1.423)<0.001
HIV status
NegativeReference 
PLH0.621 (0.546–0.705)<0.001
Highest level of education
NoneReference 
Primary0.901 (0.679–1.195)0.468
Secondary and matric0.426 (0.325–0.559)<0.001
College and university0.393 (0.285–0.542)<0.001
Employment
NoReference 
Yes1.084 (1.020–1.151)0.010
Alcohol use, past 30 d
NoReference 
Yes1.192 (1.121–1.267)<0.001
Interaction HIV status×time point
PLHIV×24‐mo follow‐up visit1.159 (1.067–1.259)<0.001
PLHIV×36‐mo follow‐up visit1.068 (0.978–1.166)0.143
Back‐transformed (logarithmic transformation of Framingham Risk Score (FRS) regression coefficients. To be interpreted as mulitplicative effects. PLHIV indicates people living with HIV.
*
Statistical significance was considered as a 2‐sided P<0.05.

Patterns in FRS by HIV Treatment Groups Over Time

A significant increase in median FRS from baseline to 36‐month follow‐up was observed for the HIV‐negative group and PLHIV taking ART. The HIV‐positive, ART‐naïve group showed a significant increase in median FRS from baseline to 24‐month follow‐up (+0.053, P=0.04), followed by no significant change from 24 to 36 months (−0.050, P=0.08) (Figure 4). Analysis allowed for participants to change treatment groups over time, resulting in 114, 21, and 16 ART‐naïve PLHIV at baseline, 24‐month, and 36‐month follow‐up, respectively.
image
Figure 4. Median Framingham Risk Score (FRS) for HIV treatment groups: people living with HIV (PLHIV) taking antiretroviral therapy (ART), PLHIV off ART, and HIV‐negative participants from baseline to 36‐month follow‐up in the Ndlovu Cohort Study, South Africa.
The results for PLHIV off ART should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size at 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up visits (n=21 and n=16, respectively). Statistical significance for the difference in FRS between HIV subgroups at each time point was tested using the Kruskal‐Wallis test, followed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. * P>0.05; ** P≤0.05.

Modeling FRS by HIV Groups Over Time

Table 3 shows the results of the linear mixed model analysis investigating the association between FRS and HIV status and time, corrected for education, employment, and alcohol consumption. An overall increase in FRS over time was observed for the entire population. The reference category (HIV‐negative, unemployed, no education, no alcohol consumption) at 24‐ and 36‐month follow‐up had a respective 36% and 35% increase (P<0.001) in FRS compared with baseline. The interaction effect between HIV status and time was only significant for the 24‐month follow‐up time point. For PLHIV, the effect of time at 24‐month follow‐up increases the FRS by an additional 16%. Compared with the HIV‐negative population, the effect of living with HIV reduced the FRS by 38% at baseline and 36‐month follow‐up, whereas the reduction was (38% minus 16%) 22% at 24‐month follow‐up. Compared with no education, secondary and matric and college and university education significantly changed (P<0.001) the FRS, with a respective decrease of 57% and 61%. Primary education attainment reduced the FRS by 10% but was not statistically significant. Being employed significantly increased the FRS by 8%. Alcohol consumption over the past 30 days significantly increased the FRS by 19%.

Discussion

In the NCS, the HIV‐negative population was observed to have a higher FRS at baseline and over time compared with PLHIV. This difference in FRS between both groups was primarily seen at baseline. However, based on the significant interaction between HIV status and time at 24 months it seems that there is also a difference in FRS trajectory between the HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative participants. The proposed explanation for the increase in FRS with employment is that employment is associated with income, and hence being better off economically, which was shown in the INTERHEART Africa study conducted in South Africa, to be positively associated with myocardial infarction in Black Africans, while the inverse was true for Europeans.38 Another study conducted in South Africa showed a positive association between BMI (as a marker of CVD risk) and being employed, although this result was significant only for the male population.39
For PLHIV, median FRS for the HIV‐positive ART‐naïve group peaked at 24‐month follow‐up (Figure 4); however, given the small number of HIV‐positive ART‐naïve participants in the current study, this finding should be interpreted with caution. This observation was further supported by the presence of a significant interaction between HIV status and time at 24‐month follow‐up. Future analysis comparing different ART regimens can provide insight into the possible effect of ART on FRS. The absence of a significant interaction at 36‐month follow‐up is believed to be related to loss of follow‐up of the study population over time. The percentage of participants lost from baseline to 36‐month follow‐up for the HIV‐negative and HIV‐positive population was 18.6% and 29.7%, respectively, which might have limited the power to detect a difference in trend in FRS development over time.
For PLHIV, we observed an ≈50% smaller median FRS for each time point after baseline, compared with the HIV‐negative population. Previous cross‐sectional results from the NCS observed HIV positivity to be associated with a better CVD risk profile,31, 40 and other studies in SSA have consistently found lower BP values (an important marker for CVD risk) for PLHIV.41, 42, 43 A likely explanation may be the possibility of a more frequent contact with health care workers and hence being more likely to receive counseling on CVD risk factors.25, 44 However, the percentage of people reporting the use of antihypertension treatment in the NCS was 2‐ to 3‐fold higher for the HIV‐negative population compared with PLHIV for all time points. This suggests that the use of medication to lower BP is not the main driver for the reduced CVD risk in PLHIV and that there might be a direct effect of HIV infection (or ART) in reducing BP for PLHIV.45, 46 This could also explain the reduced FRS observed for PLHIV, as BP is one of the covariates used to calculate FRS. How this affects the development of CVD is currently unknown.
To date, longitudinal studies on the association of HIV and CVD are scarce and have reported inconsistent results. The best evidence so far, a systematic review by Shaw et al,10 reported a 2‐fold increase in the likelihood of CVD for PLHIV as compared with their HIV‐negative counterparts in the SSA region, despite the fact that studies using surrogate outcomes or risk scores found an equal or even lower CVD risk for PLHIV. Hence, the use of FRS and other surrogate markers as reliable tools for predicting CVD risk/events still needs to be elucidated as they have not been validated in the SSA PLHIV population. Furthermore, these tools do not take into account the effects of inflammation, which even though reduced by ART, do generally not return to normal levels for PLHIV.47
Two studies in high‐income countries show varying results. A study by Hsue et al48 reported differential rates of carotid intima‐media thickness over time, with a steeper increase for PLHIV compared with HIV‐negative participants (San Francisco, CA). Another study from the United States with HIV‐positive ART‐naïve participants and matched HIV‐negative controls reported similar progression in carotid intima‐media thickness levels between both groups (Cleveland, OH).49 However, as PLHIV in SSA represent a different population and risk factor profile, the trends in CVD observed in PLHIV in high‐income countries are likely different than trends expected in the SSA population of PLHIV.

Strengths and Limitations

The main strength of the current study is the longitudinal analysis along with the inclusion of HIV‐negative controls aimed to determine the long‐term effect of HIV infection and/or it treatment on CVD risk. Another strength is inclusion of participants at both local events and the hospital, likely resulting in good representation of the community in the study population. An important limitation was the absence of BP measures from a standard device between January 2016 and November 2017, with the resulting exclusion of the 12‐month follow‐up time point from the analysis. A further limitation of the current analysis is related to the small sample size of the ART second‐line treatment groups, which foreclosed any assessment of CVD risk related to HIV treatment at the time. Over time, the ART second‐line treatment group may increase, allowing for future analysis based on a larger sample size. As of 2017, every person diagnosed with HIV should be able to start ART immediately, thus the disentanglement of the effects of HIV diagnosis and ART on CVD risk will be of little importance. The current data reflect ART used at the time of inclusion in the cohort study along with regimens with possibly more side effects for people who had been taking ART for a longer time prior to inclusion. Furthermore, before implementation of immediate ART treatment on HIV diagnosis and the current test‐and‐treat strategy, PLHIV were more likely to have uncontrolled viral loads for longer time periods, resulting in lower nadir CD4 cell counts, which has been associated with an increased CVD risk. This means that the current instruments evaluating CVD risk might not accurately predict CVD risk in PLHIV. Last, FRS estimates 10‐year CVD risk; only future inclusion of CVD outcomes will allow us to validate the predictive ability of the FRS in the Ndlovu cohort and similar SSA‐based populations.

Future Research

There is a clear need for further longitudinal large‐scale studies assessing the association of HIV and its treatment with CVD risk in order to reconcile the perceived lower risk profiles for PLHIV in SSA with actual observations of a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Furthermore, new data in the test‐and‐treat era, where patients have not been exposed to prolonged viremia and older, more toxic drug regimens, might also show different patterns of CVD risk. The high frequency of conventional CVD risk factors (eg, tobacco use, unhealthy diets, low physical activity, and increased use of alcohol) among PLHIV and those without HIV calls for a population‐based approach for CVD prevention.

Sources of Funding

The NCS has received financial support from Aidsfonds, Stichting Dioraphte, De Grote Onderneming, Hofsteestichting, and the University Medical Center Utrecht. KK‐G has been supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number UG3HL156388 and Fogarty International Center (FIC). The content of the article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the NCS research team for collecting the data. We would also like to thank all of the study participants without whom this work would not be possible.

Footnotes

This article was sent to Tiffany M. Powell‐Wiley, MD, MPH, Associate Editor, for review by expert referees, editorial decision, and final disposition.
Supplemental Material is available at Supplemental Material
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 9.

Supplemental Material

File (jah39136-sup-0001-tables.pdf)
Tables S1–S3

References

1.
Global HIV & AIDS statistics–2021 fact sheet. UNAIDS. 2021. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/
2.
Yuyun MF, Sliwa K, Kengne AP, Mocumbi AO, Bukhman G. Cardiovascular diseases in sub‐saharan Africa compared to high‐income countries: an epidemiological perspective. Glob Heart. 2020;15:1–18.
3.
Geldsetzer P, Ortblad K, Bärnighausen T. The efficiency of chronic disease care in sub‐Saharan Africa. BMC Med. 2016;14:8–11.
4.
Adeniyi OV, Longo‐Mbenza B, Ter Goon D. Female sex, poverty and globalization as determinants of obesity among rural South African type 2 diabetics: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–8.
5.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). World Health Organization. 2021. Accessed December 29, 2023. https://www.who.int/en/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/cardiovascular‐diseases‐(cvds)
6.
Africa. World Heart Federation. 2020. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://world‐heart‐federation.org/where‐we‐work/africa/.
7.
Mensah G, Roth G, Sampson U, Moran A, Feigin V, Forouzanfar M. Mortality from cardiovascular diseases in sub‐Saharan Africa, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015;26:S6–S10.
8.
Palella FJ, Baker RK, Moorman AC, Chmiel JS, Wood KC, Brooks JT, Holmberg SD; HIV Outpatient Study Investigators . Mortality in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: changing causes of death and disease in the HIV outpatient study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:27–34.
9.
Feinstein MJ, Bahiru E, Achenbach C, Longenecker CT, Hsue P, So‐Armah K, Freiberg MS, Llyod‐Jones DM. Patterns of cardiovascular mortality for HIV‐infected adults in the United States: 1999 to 2013. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:214–220.
10.
Shah ASV, Stelzle D, Ken Lee K, Beck EJ, Alam S, Clifford S, Longnecker CT, Strachan F, Bagchi S, Whiteley W, et al. Global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Circulation. 2018;138:1100–1112.
11.
McCrary AW, Nduka CU, Stranges S, Bloomfield GS. Features of cardiovascular disease in low‐income and middle‐income countries in adults and children living with HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017;12:579–584.
12.
Freiberg MS, Chang C, chou H, Kuller LH, Goetz MB, Leaf D, Oursler KA, et al. HIV infection and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;173:614–622.
13.
Zanni MV, Schouten J, Grinspoon SK, Reiss P. Risk of coronary heart disease in patients with HIV infection. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:728–741.
14.
Robbertse PPS, Doubell AF, Innes S, Lombard CJ, Herbst PG. Pulse wave velocity demonstrates increased aortic stiffness in newly diagnosed, antiretroviral naïve HIV infected adults: a case‐control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101:e29721.
15.
Okulicz JF, Le TD, Agan BK, Camargo JF, Landrum ML, Wright E, Dolan MJ, Ganesan A, Ferguson TM, Smith DM, et al. Influence of the timing of antiretroviral therapy on the potential for normalization of immune status in human immunodeficiency virus 1‐infected individuals. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:88–99.
16.
Wekesah FM, Mutua MK, Boateng D, Grobbee DE, Asiki G, Kyobutungi CK, Klipstein‐Grobusch K. Comparative performance of pooled cohort equations and Framingham risk scores in cardiovascular disease risk classification in a slum setting in Nairobi Kenya. IJC Heart Vasc. 2020;28:100521.
17.
Boateng D, Agyemang C, Beune E, Meeks K, Smeeth L, Schulze MB, Addo J, de‐Graft Aikins A, Galbete C, Bahendeka S, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in sub‐Saharan African populations—comparative analysis of risk algorithms in the RODAM study. Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:310–315.
18.
Cardiovascular diseases. World Health Organization. African Region. 2020. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.afro.who.int/health‐topics/cardiovascular‐diseases
19.
Okello S, Amir A, Bloomfield GS, Kentoffio K, Lugobe HM, Reynolds Z, Magodoro IM, North CM, Okello E, Peck R, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular disease among people living with HIV in sub‐Saharan Africa. HHS Public Access. 2020;63:149–159.
20.
History of the Framingham Heart Study. Framingham Heart Study. 2020. Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/fhs‐about/history/
21.
D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel WB. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–753.
22.
Gaziano TA, Pandya A, Steyn K, Levitt N, Mollentze W, Joubert G, Walsh CM, Motala AA, Kruger A, Schutte AE, et al. Comparative assessment of absolute cardiovascular disease risk characterization from non‐laboratory‐based risk assessment in South African populations. BMC Med. 2013;11:170.
23.
Muiru AN, Bibangambah P, Hemphill L, Sentongo R, Kim JH, Triant VA, Bangsberg DR, Tsai AC, Martin JN, Haberer JE, et al. Distribution and performance of cardiovascular risk scores in a mixed population of HIV‐infected and community‐based HIV‐uninfected individuals in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;78:458–464.
24.
Nyirenda M. Assessment of cardiovascular disease risks using Framingham risk scores (FRS) in HIV‐positive and HIV‐negative older adults in South Africa. Prev Med Rep. 2021;22:101352.
25.
Enriquez R, Ssekubugu R, Ndyanabo A, Marrone G, Gigante B, Chang LW, Reynolds SJ, Nalugoda F, Ekstrom AM, Sewankambo NK, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors by HIV status in a population‐based cohort in south central Uganda: a cross‐sectional survey. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25:e25901.
26.
Vos A, Tempelman H, Devillé W, Barth R, Wensing A, Kretzschmar M, Klipstein‐Grobusch K, Hoepelman A, Tesselaar K, Aitken S, et al. HIV and risk of cardiovascular disease in sub‐Saharan Africa: rationale and design of the Ndlovu Cohort Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:1043–1050.
27.
Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit . National Income Dynamics Study Wave 3: 2012 Proxy Questionnaire. Accessed March 1, 2022. http://www.nids.uct.ac.za/images/documents/wave3/W3_Proxy_Questionnaire_12May2016.pdf
28.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire . Long last 7 days self‐administered format (October 2002). Accessed January 3, 2021. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1etmigryv_Wijow‐IA4Sgc04p82qRgmJt/view?pli=1
29.
The STEPS instrument and support materials . World Health Organisation. Accessed December 29, 2023. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable‐diseases/surveillance/systems‐tools/steps
30.
Body mass index . World Health Organization. Accessed December 29, 2023. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic‐details/GHO/body‐mass‐index
31.
Vos AG, Barth RE, Klipstein‐Grobusch K, Tempelman HA, Devillé WLJ, Dodd C, Coutinho RA, Grobbee DE, Ndlovu Research Consortium . Cardiovascular disease burden in rural Africa: does HIV and antiretroviral treatment play a role? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:1–10.
32.
World Health Organization: Use of Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. 2011. Accessed December 29, 2023. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/70523/WHO_NMH_CHP_CPM_11.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1
33.
American Diabetes Association . Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes‐2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S14–S31.
34.
Osler M, Hilderbrand K, Hennessey C, Arendse J, Goemaere E, Ford N, Boulle A. A three‐tier framework for monitoring antiretroviral therapy in high HIV burden settings. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:18908.
35.
Reinsch N, Neuhaus K, Esser S, Potthoff A, Hower M, Mostardt S, Neumann A, Brockmeyer NH, Gelbrich G, Erbel R, et al. Are HIV patients undertreated? Cardiovascular risk factors in HIV: results of the HIV‐HEART study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2011;19:267–274.
36.
Wekesah FM, Grobbee DE, Klipstein‐Grobusch K, Kadengye D, Asiki G, Kyobutungi CK. Determinants of mortality from cardiovascular disease in the slums of Nairobi. Kenya Glob Heart. 2020;15:1–11.
37.
R Studio version 1.4.1106 . Accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.npackd.org/p/rstudio/1.4.1106
38.
Steyn K, Sliwa K, Hawken S, Commerford P, Onen C, Damasceno A, Ounpuu S, Yusuf S; INTERHEART Investigators in Africa . Risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in Africa. Circulation. 2005;112:3554–3561.
39.
Micklesfield LK, Kagura J, Munthali R, Crowther NJ, Jaff N, Gradidge P, Ramsay M, Norris SA; as members of AWI‐Gen the H3Africa Consortium . Demographic, socio‐economic and behavioural correlates of BMI in middle‐aged black men and women from urban Johannesburg, South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2018;11:1448250.
40.
Ketelaar EJ, Vos AG, Godijk NG, Scheuermaier K, Devillé W, Tempelman H, Coutinho RA, Venter WDF, Grobbee DE, Klipstein‐Grobusch K. Ideal cardiovascular health index and its determinants in a rural south African population. Glob Heart. 2020;15:15.
41.
Mogaka JN, Sharma M, Temu T, Masyuko S, Kinuthia J, Osoti A, Zifodya J, Nakanjako D, Njoroge A, Otedo A, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with hypertension among adults with and without HIV in Western Kenya. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0262400.
42.
Magodoro IM, Okello S, Dungeni M, Castle AC, Mureyani S, Danaei G. Association between HIV and prevalent hypertension and diabetes mellitus in South Africa: analysis of a nationally representative cross‐sectional survey. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;121:217–225.
43.
Niwaha AJ, Wosu AC, Kayongo A, Batte C, Siddharthan T, Kalyesubula R, Kirenga B, Checkley W. Association between blood pressure and HIV status in rural Uganda: results of cross‐sectional analysis. Glob Heart. 2021;16:1–14.
44.
Manne‐Goehler J, Montana L, Gómez‐Olivé FX, Rohr J, Harling G, Wagner RG, Wade A, Kabudula CW, Geldsetzer P, Kahn K, et al. The ART advantage: healthcare utilization for diabetes and hypertension in rural South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75:561–567.
45.
Okello S, Ueda P, Kanyesigye M, Byaruhanga E, Kiyimba A, Amanyire G, Kintu A, Fawzi WW, Muyindike WR, Danaei G. Association between HIV and blood pressure in adults and role of body weight as a mediator: cross‐sectional study in Uganda. J Clin Hypertens. 2017;19:1181–1191.
46.
Okello S, Kim JH, Sentongo RN, Tracy R, Tsai AC, Kakuhikire B, Siedner MJ. Blood pressure trajectories and the mediated effects of body mass index and HIV‐related inflammation in a mixed cohort of people with and without HIV in rural Uganda. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21:1230–1241.
47.
Hileman CO, Funderburg NT. Inflammation, immune activation, and antiretroviral therapy in HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2017;14:93–100.
48.
Hsue PY, Scherzer R, Hunt PW, Schnell A, Bolger AF, Kalapus SC, Maka K, Martin JN, Ganz P, Deeks SG. Carotid intima‐media thickness progression in HIV‐infected adults occurs preferentially at the carotid bifurcation and is predicted by inflammation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:jah3‐e000422.
49.
Hileman CO, Longenecker CT, Carman TL, Mccomsey GA. C‐reactive protein predicts 96‐week carotid intima media thickness progression in HIV‐infected adults naive to antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:340–344.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of the American Heart Association
Go to Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association
PubMed: 38214319

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 28 January 2023
Accepted: 22 November 2023
Published online: 12 January 2024
Published in print: 16 January 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. antiretroviral therapy
  2. cardiovascular risk factors
  3. Framingham Risk Score
  4. HIV
  5. sub‐Saharan Africa

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
BionamiX, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Alinda G. Vos‐Seda, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-6223
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
Daniel Boateng, MSc, PhD
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
School of Public Health Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana
Karine Scheuermaier, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3397-543X
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Wits Sleep Laboratory, Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
Hugo Tempelman, MD, MA
Ndlovu Care Group Groblersdal South Africa
Roos E. Barth, MD, PhD
Department of Infectious Disease University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Walter Devillé, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-1718
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Roel A. Coutinho, MD, PhD
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
PharmAccess Foundation Amsterdam The Netherlands
Francois Venter, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-732X
Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
Diederick E. Grobbee, MD, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-4468
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Kerstin Klipstein‐Grobusch, MSc, PhD* https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-9889 [email protected]
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa

Notes

*
Correspondence to: Kerstin Klipstein‐Grobusch, PhD, Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Funding Information

Aidsfonds
De Grote Onderneming
Hofsteestichting
University Medical Center Utrecht

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Changes in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores in a Predominantly Black Cohort with HIV and Associated Comorbidities: A Preliminary Study, Cardiology, (1-9), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1159/000540526
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response