You are viewing the correction.
VIEW THE CORRECTED ARTICLEIn the article by De Cocker et al (De Cocker LJL, Kloppenborg RP, van der Graaf Y, Luijten PR, Hendrikse J, Geerlings MI; SMART Study Group. Cerebellar cortical infarct cavities: correlation with risk factors and MRI markers of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 2015:46: 3154–3160. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010093.), which published online ahead of print on September 17, 2015, and appeared in the November 2015 issue of the journal, a correction was needed. The final version of the article presented regression coefficients rather than odds ratios for the functioning scales.
On page 3154, Abstract section Results, line 7, “(OR, −2.6; 95% CI, −5.7 to −0.9),” has been changed to read “(OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99).”
On page 3156, Materials and Methods Data Analysis section, second to last sentence, “Third, linear regression analysis was used to investigate whether presence of cerebellar cortical infarct cavities (independent variable) was associated with changes in physical and mental functioning (dependent variable), corrected for age and sex,” has been changed to read “Third, linear regression analysis was used to investigate whether presence of cerebellar cortical infarct cavities (dependent variable) was associated with changes in physical and mental functioning (independent variable), corrected for age and sex.”
On page 3157, fifth paragraph of the Results, “Presence of cerebellar cortical infarct cavities was significantly associated with worse physical functioning (OR, −2.6; 95% CI, −5.7 to −0.9), whereas it was not associated with mental functioning (OR, −1.1; 95% CI, −2.7 to 0.8) or MiniMental State Examination (OR, −0.4; 95% CI, −0.5 to 0.4),” has been changed to read “Presence of cerebellar cortical infarct cavities was significantly associated with worse physical functioning (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99), whereas it was not significantly associated with mental functioning (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.02) or Mini-Mental State Examination (OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.1).”
The significance of the results does not differ from the original results.
The authors regret the error.
This correction has been made to the online version of the article, which is available at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/46/11/3154.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.
History
Published online: 1 February 2016
Published in print: February 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.