Prevalence and Calcification of Intracranial Arterial Stenotic Lesions as Assessed With Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography
- Other version(s) of this article
You are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions:
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in patients with recent ischemic stroke is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. More insight into the pathophysiology of ICAS could help identify patients at high risk requiring more aggressive secondary prevention. We evaluated the prevalence, distribution, calcification, and the risk factors predisposing ICAS in a European stroke population.
Methods—
Consecutive patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke (n=786) were evaluated for the presence and distribution of ICAS (≥30% luminal narrowing) by CT angiography. ICAS were categorized as symptomatic or asymptomatic, and the presence of calcification was assessed. The association of traditional cerebrovascular risk factors and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate with ICAS was analyzed.
Results—
In 178 of 786 patients (23%), 288 ICAS were observed. Most stenoses (n=194/288; 67%) were located in the posterior circulation arteries. In 59 of 786 patients (8%), ICAS were considered symptomatic. ICAS in the basilar artery and arteries beyond the circle of Willis were mainly noncalcified. In addition to age, gender, and several traditional cerebrovascular risk factors, erythrocyte sedimentation rate was independently associated with the presence of ICAS (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06–1.36) and with the presence of noncalcified ICAS in particular (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05–1.37).
Conclusions—
ICAS was observed in a noteworthy number of European stroke patients. Particularly, the majority of ICAS was observed in the posterior circulation, possibly conferring worse prognosis. ICAS in distal arteries were mainly noncalcified. Association of noncalcified ICAS and erythrocyte sedimentation rate may indicate a prominent role for inflammatory factors in intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in patients with TIA or ischemic stroke is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke.1 Angioplasty and stenting are feasible procedures for revascularization of vessels affected by ICAS. However, insufficient evidence is available to recommend these treatments for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with ICAS in clinical practice.2 More insight into the prevalence, distribution, and calcification of ICAS lesions could help identify patients at high risk requiring more aggressive secondary prevention.
The prevalence of ICAS seems to vary among ethnic groups.3 Nevertheless, only limited studies have assessed the prevalence and associated risk factors for ICAS in European stroke patients.4–6 Moreover, the comparative value of studies available in European patients is limited by the use of multiple imaging modalities.
Also, little is known about the composition of ICAS lesions, which may point to a specific pathophysiological process.7 The pathophysiology of intracranial atherosclerosis is suggested to differ from that of the extracranial arteries.8 A prominent role for inflammatory factors is indicated in the atherosclerosis of the intracranial arteries.9 Consequently, the proatherogenic influence of inflammatory reactions could be manifested as an association between the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and ICAS, as previously observed in a single study.10 In addition, an accelerated intracranial atherogenesis could be reflected in differences in plaque calcification.
Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) is reliable for the evaluation of both extracranial11 and intracranial atherosclerotic disease.12 Moreover, the technique is available for detection of ICAS in most European hospitals.13 As compared to digital subtraction angiography, MDCTA has been demonstrated to be effective in the detection of ICAS, with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 99%.12 In addition, MDCTA allows differentiation between calcified and noncalcified atherosclerotic plaques.14
In the current study, we evaluated a large cohort of patients with TIA or ischemic stroke for the prevalence, distribution, and the calcification of ICAS lesions using MDCTA. Furthermore, the association of ICAS with the traditional risk factors for cerebrovascular disease as well as with ESR was investigated.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
From a prospective registry of 911 consenting patients with amaurosis fugax, TIA, or ischemic stroke (Rankin score <4 at discharge), we selected all patients (n=795) with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA but excluded patients with amaurosis fugax. Patients were enrolled from a specialized TIA/stroke outpatient clinic or the stroke unit. All patients were interviewed and examined by a vascular neurologist and underwent electrocardiography and laboratory analysis. Medical history and cerebrovascular risk factors were recorded. On admission, patients underwent MDCT of the brain and MDCTA of the carotid and intracranial arteries in a single session. Three patients with MDCTA of insufficient quality for reliable evaluation and 6 patients with intracranial arteries outside the scan reconstruction area were excluded. Consequently, analyses were performed in the remaining 786 patients.
Risk Factors
Ethnicity of patients was determined through an algorithm based on place of birth of the patients and their parents, as well as on name and surname.15 For the purpose of this study, we distinguished between Asian and non-Asian ethnicities. History of ischemic heart disease was defined as previous chronic heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or coronary artery bypass grafting. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as fasting cholesterol >5.0 mmol/L or treatment with cholesterol-lowering medication. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure >140 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg during 2 episodes of at least 15 minutes of continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement or treatment with antihypertensive medication. Diabetes was defined as fasting serum a glucose level >7.9 mmol/L, HbA1c >6.5%, or use of antidiabetic medication. Laboratory analysis included total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose, as well as ESR.
MDCT and MDCTA Data Acquisition and Analysis
MDCTA was performed with a 16-slice MDCT scanner (Sensation 16; Siemens) or a 64-slice MDCT scanner (Sensation 64; Siemens) with a standardized protocol.16,17 Intracranial arteries were evaluated on a stand-alone workstation (Leonardo; Siemens Medical Solutions) with multiplanar reformatting and maximum intensity projection images of 4-mm thickness (Figure 1). Because symptomatic ulceration with superimposed thrombus of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques is also present in low-grade stenosis, we defined ICAS as ≥30% luminal narrowing.18 The degree of stenosis was measured according to the WASID criteria on oblique multiplanar reformatting images perpendicular to the central lumen line.19 Stenoses were classified as 30% to 49%, 50% to 69%, and 70% to 99%. The internal carotid arteries, the anterior cerebral arteries, the medial cerebral arteries, the vertebral arteries, the basilar artery, and the posterior cerebral arteries were analyzed.

Figure 1. Assessment of intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) using multidector CTA. Upper row, maximum intensity projection images of 4-mm thickness demonstrating ICAS 30% to 49% in the right posterior cerebral artery (A), ICAS 50% to 69% in the left anterior cerebral artery (B), and ICAS 70% to 99% in the basilar artery (C). Lower row, volume-rendering images demonstrating the same ICAS lesions in 3-dimensional anatomy.
Blinded to clinical information, 2 trained observers (P.J.H. and G.J.J.P.) independently analyzed the presence of ICAS according the WASID method in the first 50 patients. After 4 weeks, the first observer analyzed the same 50 patients. Good interobserver agreement (κ=0.79; 95% CI, 0.55–1.02) and intraobserver agreement (κ=0.79; 95% CI, 0.60–0.99) were observed.
A calcified ICAS lesion was defined as any intracranial stenosis (≥30%) containing plaque calcifications (>130 Hounsfield units). Symptomatic ICAS was defined as any intracranial stenosis (≥30%) in an artery supplying the involved region of the brain, taking into account the configuration of the circle of Willis.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between variables were tested with the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, or a nonparametric rank test when appropriate. The association of traditional cerebrovascular risk factors and ESR with the presence of ICAS was determined using regression analysis. The risk factors significantly associated with ICAS (P<0.05) in the univariable regression analysis, which were not directly interrelated, were included in a multivariable regression model. Associations were expressed as OR with 95% CI. The analysis was repeated for the presence of noncalcified ICAS lesions, calcified ICAS lesions, and symptomatic ICAS in patients. For the purpose of this analysis, patients with solely noncalcified ICAS lesions were considered as “patients with noncalcified ICAS lesions,” whereas patients with any calcified ICAS lesions were considered as “patients with calcified ICAS lesions.” Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Prevalence, Distribution, and Calcification of ICAS
Most patients were male (n=513; 56%) and the mean age was 62±14 years. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without ICAS are illustrated in Table 1. The presence and severity of ICAS in different arteries are shown in Table 2. ICAS ≥30% was observed in 178 patients (23%). ICAS ≥50% was present in 77 patients (10%), and ICAS ≥70% was present in 21 patients (3%). In total, 288 ICAS (≥30%) were observed.
| No ICAS (n=608; 77%) | ICAS (n=178; 23%) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 60±14 | 68±12 | <0.001 |
| Male | 332 (55%) | 110 (62%) | 0.09 |
| Asian | 20 (3%) | 16 (9%) | 0.001 |
| Index event | |||
| TIA | 238 (39%) | 47 (26%) | 0.002 |
| Ischemic stroke | 370 (61%) | 131 (74%) | |
| Time since onset (days) | 5 (1–14) | 5 (0–18) | 0.40 |
| Cerebrovascular history | |||
| Previous ischemic stroke | 77 (13%) | 32 (18%) | 0.07 |
| Previous TIA >6 mo | 85 (14%) | 30 (17%) | 0.34 |
| History of ischemic heart disease | 101 (17%) | 33 (19%) | 0.55 |
| Cerebrovascular risk factors | |||
| Hypercholesterolemia | 440 (72%) | 135 (76%) | 0.36 |
| Hypertension | 389 (64%) | 146 (82%) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 92 (15%) | 53 (30%) | <0.001 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 39 (6%) | 14 (8%) | 0.50 |
| Smoking | 230 (38%) | 56 (31%) | 0.12 |
| Laboratory results | |||
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.2±1.1 | 5.3±1.2 | 0.38 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.41±0.51 | 1.40±0.74 | 0.51 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.29±1.04 | 3.47±1.19 | 0.15 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.72±2.54 | 1.71±0.96 | 0.16 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 4.9±1.7 | 5.7±2.4 | <0.001 |
| ESR (mm/hr) | 13±12 | 16±15 | 0.001 |
| Extracranial carotid artery stenosis ≥50% | 50 (8%) | 38 (21%) | <0.001 |
| Artery | No. of ICAS | Degree of Stenosis | Occlusions | Calcified ICAS Lesions | Symptomatic ICAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30–49% | 50–69% | 70–99% | |||||
| Anterior (n=94; 33%) | |||||||
| ICA | 31 (11%) | 24 (8%) | 7 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 14 | 25 (9%) | 15 (5%) |
| ACA | 17 (6%) | 11 (4%) | 6 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 4 (1%) |
| MCA | 46 (16%) | 30 (10%) | 14 (5%) | 2 (1%) | 20 | 0 (0%) | 20 (7%) |
| Posterior (n=194; 67%) | |||||||
| VA | 88 (31%) | 57 (20%) | 24 (8%) | 7 (2%) | 4 | 39 (14%) | 8 (3%) |
| BA | 30 (10%) | 16 (6%) | 8 (3%) | 6 (2%) | 5 | 0 (0%) | 8 (3%) |
| PCA | 76 (26%) | 46 (16%) | 24 (8%) | 6 (2%) | 9 | 3 (1%) | 8 (3%) |
| Total | 288 (100%) | 184 (64%) | 83 (29%) | 21 (7%) | 67 (23%) | 63 (22%) | |
In 184 of 288 ICAS (64%), the degree of stenosis ranged from 30% to 49%, from 50% to 69% in 83 of 288 ICAS (29%), and from 70% to 99% in the remaining 21 of 288 ICAS (7%). Occlusions were present in 52 arteries. Interestingly, the majority of ICAS (n=194/288; 67%) was located in the posterior circulation. Stenoses ≥70% occurred mainly in the posterior circulation of the brain. Exclusively noncalcified ICAS lesions were observed in 126 patients (16%). In total 221 of 288 ICAS, lesions (77%) were noncalcified. ICAS lesions in the anterior cerebral artery, medial cerebral artery, and basilar artery were exclusively noncalcified. Calcified ICAS lesions were predominantly present in the proximal arteries (internal carotid artery and vertebral artery; n=64), whereas only 3 calcified ICAS lesions were identified in the posterior cerebral artery. In 59 patients (8%), a total of 63 symptomatic ICAS ≥30% was observed. Symptomatic ICAS of ≥50% was present in 18 of the patients (3%). Overall, symptomatic ICAS comprised 39 stenoses in the anterior circulation and 24 stenoses in the posterior circulation.
Risk Factors Associated With ICAS
Multivariable analysis revealed an independent association between ICAS and age, male gender, Asian ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, LDL cholesterol, and ESR (Table 3). Risk factors independently associated with noncalcified ICAS lesions and calcified ICAS lesions are provided in Table 4. Age, male gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, LDL cholesterol, and ESR remained independently associated with noncalcified ICAS lesions, whereas only age was independently associated with calcified ICAS lesions. The median time since symptom onset and clinical and laboratory analysis was 5 days.1–14 The association of ESR with ICAS remained present after adjustment for time between onset of symptoms (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08–1.36). Interestingly, ESR increased with degree of intracranial stenosis (Figure 2). Age, Asian ethnicity, hypertension, and ESR were independently associated with symptomatic ICAS.
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (per 10 y)* | 1.65 (1.43–1.90) | 1.65 (1.40–1.94) |
| Male | 1.34 (0.96–1.89) | 1.55 (1.05–2.29) |
| Asian | 2.90 (1.47–5.73) | 2.68 (1.20–5.98) |
| Index event | ||
| Ischemic stroke | 1.79 (1.24–2.60) | … |
| Cerebrovascular history | ||
| Previous ischemic stroke | 1.51 (0.96–2.37) | … |
| Previous TIA >6 mo | 1.25 (0.79–1.96) | … |
| History of ischemic heart disease | 1.14 (0.74–1.76) | … |
| Cerebrovascular risk factors | ||
| Hypercholesterolemia | 1.20 (0.81–1.76) | … |
| Hypertension | 2.57 (1.69–3.90) | 1.87 (1.16–3.00) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2.38 (1.61–3.51) | 2.08 (1.34–3.22) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 1.25 (0.66–2.35) | … |
| Smoking | 0.75 (0.53–1.08) | … |
| Laboratory results | ||
| Cholesterol (mmol/L)* | 1.13 (0.97–1.30) | … |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)* | 0.99 (0.74–1.34) | … |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)* | 1.17 (0.99–1.36) | 1.33 (1.12–1.59) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L)* | 1.00 (0.93–1.08) | … |
| Glucose (mmol/L)* | 1.19 (1.10–1.29) | … |
| ESR (per 10 mm/h)* | 1.22 (1.09–1.37) | 1.20 (1.06–1.36) |
| Extracranial carotid artery stenosis ≥50% | 3.03 (1.91–4.80) | … |
| OR (95% CI) Noncalcified ICAS Lesions (n=126; 16%) | OR (95% CI) Calcified ICAS Lesions (n=52; 7%) | OR (95% CI) Symptomatic ICAS (n=59; 8%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (per 10 y)* | 1.37 (1.15–1.63) | 2.09 (1.56–2.82) | 1.37 (1.07–1.75) |
| Male | 1.56 (1.01–2.40) | 1.29 (0.68–2.45) | 1.60 (0.87–2.92) |
| Asian | 2.02 (0.88–4.62) | 2.52 (0.76–8.36) | 3.69 (1.49–9.14) |
| Hypertension | 1.74 (1.02–2.96) | 1.84 (0.79–4.31) | 3.04 (1.23–7.49) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 2.13 (1.32–3.42) | 1.37 (0.67–2.81) | 1.52 (0.80–2.86) |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)* | 1.29 (1.07–1.57) | 1.25 (0.94–1.67) | 1.08 (0.83–1.41) |
| ESR (per 10 mm/h)* | 1.20 (1.05–1.37) | 1.09 (0.88–1.35) | 1.23 (1.04–1.46) |

Figure 2. Box plot illustrating higher median erythrocyte sedimentation rates with increase of severity of stenosis.
Discussion
In the current study, ICAS ≥30% was observed in 178 patients (23%) with a recent ischemic stroke or TIA. The majority of all ICAS was located in the posterior circulation arteries. Symptomatic ICAS ≥30% was observed in 59 patients (8%). Calcified ICAS lesions were predominantly observed in the proximal intracranial arteries (internal carotid artery and vertebral artery), whereas ICAS lesions in the distal intracranial arteries (basilar artery, anterior cerebral artery, medial cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery) were mainly noncalcified. A number of traditional risk factors including age, male gender, Asian ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and LDL cholesterol were independently associated with the presence of ICAS in multivariable analysis. An independent association was also observed between ESR and ICAS. Equivalent traditional risk factors and ESR were also associated with noncalcified ICAS lesions. However, age was the only risk factor associated with calcified ICAS lesions.
Prevalence and Distribution of ICAS
The comparability of studies on the prevalence of ICAS in stroke patients is limited because of the variation in the studied populations, definition of ICAS, and used imaging modalities. Thus far, large studies on the prevalence, distribution, and risk factors predisposing ICAS have been mainly performed in Asian stroke populations.20–22 Relatively high prevalence of 26% to 54% was observed in studies of different Asian populations of stroke patients. In contrast, limited studies have evaluated the prevalence of ICAS in Europe.4,5,6 In a multicenter European study by Weimar et al,6 using various imaging modalities, symptomatic ICAS of ≥50% was observed in 6.5% of the evaluated stroke patients. In contrast, the results of the present study reveal a lower prevalence of symptomatic ICAS ≥50% in European stroke patients (3%). The difference in prevalence can be partly explained by the inclusion of a higher proportion of patients with TIA and the exclusion of patients with severe ischemic stroke (Rankin score <4 at discharge) in the current study.
Observed prevalence and distribution of ICAS are also influenced by the applied imaging modality.23 In general, transcranial Doppler is more operator-dependent and obtained results vary according to operator skills. Moreover, transcranial Doppler is suggested to be less sensitive than CTA for the detection of ICAS in the posterior circulation.23,24 However, in Asian patients with TIA and ischemic stroke, the anterior circulation seems to be the predilection site in the distribution of ICAS irrespective of the imaging modality.25–27 Distribution of ICAS reported in European stroke patients has been less consistent. Using either digital subtraction angiography or ultrasonography for primary detection, Mazighi et al4 reported a similar distribution of ICAS in the anterior and posterior circulations. In contrast, using Doppler/duplex ultrasonography in 99% of the studied patients, Weimar et al6 observed a higher prevalence of ICAS in the anterior (77%) versus the posterior (23%) circulation. Using MDCTA in current study, the majority of ICAS (67%) was located in the posterior circulation. The lower proportion of ICAS in the posterior circulation in the previous European studies may be attributable to a detection bias, because investigators have mainly relied on ultrasonography. Of note, detection of ICAS in the posterior circulation may be an important prognostic determinant because these lesions have been associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke.1,28,29
Composition of ICAS Lesions
Thus far, limited imaging studies have evaluated the composition of ICAS lesions. CT brain studies have reported a predominant presence of calcification in the proximal arteries but did not combine the evaluation of ICAS and plaque calcification with MDCTA.30,31 Our findings confirm the presence of calcified ICAS lesions in the proximal intracranial arteries. However, a majority of noncalcified ICAS lesions was demonstrated in the distal arteries, which would be neglected on CT of the brain. This implicates that absence of calcification on CT of the brain does not exclude the presence of ICAS in the distal arteries. In line with the results of the current study, a previous postmortem histological analysis of atherosclerotic plaque composition in the medial cerebral artery has demonstrated calcification in only a minority of the specimens (31 of 111; 28%).32
The low prevalence of calcified ICAS lesions on MDCTA in the distal intracranial arteries suggests a different pathophysiology of atherosclerotic disease in the proximal and distal intracranial arteries. The intracranial arteries show significantly greater antioxidant enzyme activities than the extracranial arteries.8 The greater activity of antioxidant enzymes in intracranial arteries may contribute to a greater resistance to atherogenesis. This antiatherogenic activity decreases significantly in older age, coinciding with accelerated atherogenesis.8 Consequently, with age, intracranial arteries may respond with accelerated atherogenesis as their antioxidant protection decreases more significantly than that of the extracranial arteries. In the current study, the higher prevalence of extracranial stenosis in patients with ICAS supports the loss of protective antioxidant capacity in the extracranial arteries at a younger age. In line with this observation, higher plasma C-reactive protein levels have been previously noted in patients with extracranial stenosis as compared to those with isolated medial cerebral artery stenosis.33
Furthermore, with age, plasma LDL becomes more susceptible to oxidation.34 The oxidative modification of LDL therefore may play a key role in this atherogenic process through inflammatory reactions.35,36 The presence of mainly noncalcified ICAS lesions in the basilar artery and arteries beyond the circle of Willis in the current study might be a reflection of this accelerated atherogenesis.
Risk Factors Associated With ICAS
A number of traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic disease have been previously related to ICAS.3,9,37 In addition, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, is associated with recurrent ischemic events in the territory of the stenotic artery in stroke patients with ICAS.5 Also, ESR was shown to be independently associated of with the presence of ICAS in a South Asian stroke population.10 In the present study of European patients, ICAS lesions were associated not only with the traditional risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, and LDL cholesterol but also with ESR. Importantly, the association of ESR with ICAS remained significant even after adjustment for the time since onset of symptoms. Thereby, the contribution of the acute phase reaction as a cause of ESR elevation was made less probable. As a result, an independent association was identified between ESR and LDL cholesterol with the presence of ICAS and, more importantly, with the presence of noncalcified ICAS lesions in patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke. These findings may indicate a prominent role for inflammation in intracranial atherogenesis.35,36
Study Limitations
The design of the present study is cross-sectional. The prognostic values of the presence, distribution, and calcification of ICAS lesions in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA remain to be determined in follow-up studies. The pathophysiological mechanisms initiating intracranial atherosclerosis were not evaluated. However, the predisposing risk factors and degree of calcification of ICAS support the current hypothesis on the delayed development of intracranial atherosclerosis.
In the current study, the association of ICAS with the ESR was investigated as a marker of inflammatory processes in the atherosclerosis of the intracranial arteries. However, the ESR is only an indirect indicator of inflammatory processes and could be increased because of comorbidity. We did not exclude patients with comorbidity associated with ESR elevation to avoid additional bias. Evaluation of additional inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukins could have provided additional data on the role of inflammatory processes in intracranial atherosclerosis. Finally, the ESR was only measured at a single time point and during the acute phase in some of the patients.
Conclusions
It has been suggested that atherosclerosis in the extracranial carotid artery is the primary source of ischemic stroke in white patients.38 We observed a low prevalence of ICAS in the current study population of predominantly white ethnicity. However, most ICAS were observed in the posterior circulation, a location associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke.1,28,29
Mainly noncalcified ICAS lesions were observed in distal intracranial arteries. A strong association of LDL cholesterol and ESR was identified with the presence of ICAS and, more importantly, with the presence of noncalcified ICAS lesions in patients with a recent TIA or ischemic stroke. Accordingly, in intracranial atherogenesis, a prominent role is indicated for inflammation. Further research on noninvasive analysis of plaque components in ICAS lesions could improve understanding of the pathophysiology of intracranial atherosclerosis. The additional evaluation of intraplaque hemorrhage using high-resolution MRI, which is likely to convey strong prognostic value for recurrent stroke, may be of particular interest.39
Sources of Funding
Aad van der Lugt is recipient of a fellowship from the
Disclosure
None.
Footnotes
References
- 1.
Kasner SE, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, Levine SR, Chaturvedi S, Benesch CG, Sila CA, Jovin TG, Romano JG, Cloft HJ , Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation. 2006; 113:555–563.LinkGoogle Scholar - 2.
Cruz-Flores S, Diamond AL . Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 3:CD004133.Google Scholar - 3.
Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1995; 26:14–20.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.
Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X, Vicaut E, Bracard S, Houdart E, Woimant F . Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: the GESICA study. Neurology. 2006; 66:1187–1191.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.
Arenillas JF, Molina CA, Chacón P, Rovira A, Montaner J, Coscojuela P, Sánchez E, Quintana M, Alvarez-Sabín J . High lipoprotein (a), diabetes, and the extent of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Neurology. 2004; 63:27–32.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 6.
Weimar C, Goertler M, Harms L, Diener HC . Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Arch Neurol. 2006; 63:1287–1291.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.
Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK . Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: a large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke. 2008; 39:2396–2399.LinkGoogle Scholar - 8.
D'Armiento FP, Bianchi A, de Nigris F, Capuzzi DM, D'Armiento MR, Crimi G, Abete P, Palinski W, Condorelli M, Napoli C . Age-related effects on atherogenesis and scavenger enzymes of intracranial and extracranial arteries in men without classic risk factors for atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2001; 32:2472–2479.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.
Arenillas JF, Alvarez-Sabín J, Molina CA, Chacón P, Montaner J, Rovira A, Ibarra B, Quintana M . C-reactive protein predicts further ischemic events in first-ever transient ischemic attack or stroke patients with intracranial large-artery occlusive disease. Stroke. 2003; 34:2463–2468.LinkGoogle Scholar - 10.
De Silva DA, Woon FP, Lee MP, Chen CP, Chang HM, Wong MC . South Asian patients with ischemic stroke: intracranial large arteries are the predominant site of disease. Stroke. 2007; 38:2592–2594.LinkGoogle Scholar - 11.
Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001; 220:179–185.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.
Nguyen-Huynh MN, Wintermark M, English J, Lam J, Vittinghoff E, Smith WS, Johnston SC . How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease?Stroke. 2008; 39:1184–1188.LinkGoogle Scholar - 13.
Balucani C, Leys D, Ringelstein EB, Kaste M, Hacke W , Executive Committee of the European Stroke Initiative. Detection of intracranial atherosclerosis: which imaging techniques are available in European hospitals?Stroke. 2009; 40:726–729.LinkGoogle Scholar - 14.
Cordeiro MA, Lima JA . Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(Suppl 8):C40–C47.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.
Bouwhuis CB, Moll HA . Determination of ethnicity in children in The Netherlands: two methods compared. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003; 18:385–388.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.
de Monyé C, Cademartiri F, de Weert TT, Siepman DA, Dippel DW, van Der Lugt A . Sixteen-detector row CT angiography of carotid arteries: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a bolus chaser. Radiology. 2005; 237:555–562.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.
Homburg PJ, Rozie S, van Gils MJ, Jansen T, de Weert TT, Dippel DW, van der Lugt A . Atherosclerotic plaque ulceration in the symptomatic internal carotid artery is associated with nonlacunar ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010; 41:1151–1156.LinkGoogle Scholar - 18.
Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Gongora-Rivera F, Duyckaerts C, Hauw JJ, Amarenco P . Autopsy prevalence of intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke. 2008; 39:1142–1147.LinkGoogle Scholar - 19.
Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21:643–646.MedlineGoogle Scholar - 20.
Bang OY, Kim JW, Lee JH, Lee MA, Lee PH, Joo IS, Huh K . Association of the metabolic syndrome with intracranial atherosclerotic stroke. Neurology. 2005; 65:296–298.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.
Nam HS, Han SW, Lee JY, Ahn SH, Ha JW, Rim SJ, Lee BI, Heo JH . Association of aortic plaque with intracranial atherosclerosis in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2006; 67:1184–1188.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 22.
De Silva DA, Woon FP, Pin LM, Chen CP, Chang HM, Wong MC . Intracranial large artery disease among OCSP subtypes in ethnic South Asian ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol Sci. 2007; 260:147–149.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 23.
Rorick MB, Nichols FT, Adams RJ . Transcranial Doppler correlation with angiography in detection of intracranial stenosis. Stroke. 1994; 25:1931–1934.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 24.
Graf J, Skutta B, Kuhn FP, Ferbert A . Computed tomographic angiography findings in 103 patients following vascular events in the posterior circulation: potential and clinical relevance. J Neurol. 2000; 247:760–766.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 25.
Suh DC, Lee SH, Kim KR, Park ST, Lim SM, Kim SJ, Choi CG, Lee HK . Pattern of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in Korean patients with stroke: different involvement of intracranial versus extracranial vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24:239–244.MedlineGoogle Scholar - 26.
Huang YN, Gao S, Li SW, Huang Y, Li JF, Wong KS, Kay R . Vascular lesions in Chinese patients with transient ischemic attacks. Neurology. 1997; 48:524–525.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 27.
Wong KS, Li H, Chan YL, Ahuja A, Lam WW, Wong A, Kay R . Use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound to predict outcome in patients with intracranial large-artery occlusive disease. Stroke. 2000; 31:2641–2647.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 28.
Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, Brown MB, Levine SR, Silliman S, Pessin MS, Weichel E, Sila CA, Furlan AJ . The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology. 1995; 45:1488–1493.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 29. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group. Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. Stroke. 1998; 29:1389–1392.LinkGoogle Scholar
- 30.
Sohn YH, Cheon HY, Jeon P, Kang SY . Clinical implication of cerebral artery calcification on brain CT. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004; 18:332–337.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 31.
Chen XY, Lam WW, Ng HK, Fan YH, Wong KS . The frequency and determinants of calcification in intracranial arteries in Chinese patients who underwent computed tomography examinations. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21:91–97.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 32.
Chen XY, Wong KS, Lam WW, Zhao HL, Ng HK . Middle cerebral artery atherosclerosis: histological comparison between plaques associated with and not associated with infarct in a postmortem study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008; 25:74–80.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 33.
Bang OY, Lee PH, Yoon SR, Lee MA, Joo IS, Huh K . Inflammatory markers, rather than conventional risk factors, are different between carotid and MCA atherosclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76:1128–1134.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 34.
Napoli C, Abete P, Corso G, Malorni A, Postiglione A, Ambrosio G, Cacciatore F, Rengo F, Palumbo G . Increased low-density lipoprotein peroxidation in elderly men. Coron Artery Dis. 1997; 8:129–136.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 35.
Grønholdt ML . Age, antioxidants, and atherogenesis. Stroke. 2001; 32:2479–2480.MedlineGoogle Scholar - 36.
Ross R . Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:115–126.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 37.
Bae HJ, Lee J, Park JM, Kwon O, Koo JS, Kim BK, Pandey DK . Risk factors of intracranial cerebral atherosclerosis among asymptomatics. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 24:355–360.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 38.
Wong LK . Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. 2006; 1:158–159.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar - 39.
Turan TN, Bonilha L, Morgan PS, Adams RJ, Chimowitz MI . Intraplaque Hemorrhage in Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease. J Neuroimaging. 2009Nov11[Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar


