Skip main navigation
×

Use of Follow-Up Imaging in Isolated Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

A Meta-Analysis
Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007370Stroke. 2015;46:401–406

Abstract

Background and Purpose—

Multiple studies have shown that negative computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) are reliable in excluding aneurysms in patients with isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (pSAH). We evaluate the use of digital subtraction angiography versus CTA for initial diagnosis and of angiographic follow-ups in patients with pSAH by performing an institutional analysis and a meta-analysis of literature.

Methods—

Retrospective institutional analysis of patients with pSAH was performed from 2008 to 2014. The number and types of follow-up imaging studies were tabulated. Initial and follow-up studies were evaluated by an experienced neuroradiologist for intracranial aneurysm. Meta-analysis of literature was performed to assess the use of initial digital subtraction angiography and of follow-up imaging.

Results—

Our institutional review revealed no additional use of initial digital subtraction angiography or of any angiographic follow-up after initial negative CTA in patients with pSAH on noncontrast CT. Meta-analysis of 40 studies yielded a total of 1031 patients. Only 8 aneurysms were first diagnosed on follow-ups (0.78%). Careful review showed that some of these aneurysms reported on follow-up are of questionable validity. Initial digital subtraction angiography and follow-up imaging after a negative initial CTA showed no statistically significant benefits.

Conclusions—

In patients meeting the strict imaging criteria of pSAH, initial negative CTA is reliable in excluding aneurysms. A critical review of the literature through meta-analysis shows no foundation for multiple follow-up studies in patients with pSAH.

Introduction

The isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (pSAH) pattern was first described as a distinct imaging and clinical entity by van Gijn et al1 in 1985. It is defined as the presence of blood confined primarily in the perimesencephalic cistern, anterior to the brain stem, with possible extension to ambient cisterns or proximal stems of the sylvian fissures but without extension to lateral parts of the sylvian fissures, anterior interhemispheric fissures, or lateral ventricles. The pSAH pattern is seen in 5% of patients with SAH, with an annual incidence of ≈0.5 per 100 000 patients.2

Over the past decade, advances in computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) technology, with better contrast bolus timing and 64-row detector arrays, have allowed for aneurysms to be diagnosed with ≈100% sensitivity in ≈10% of patients with pSAH caused by aneurysmal bleeding.37 Multiple studies have shown the reliability of CTA in excluding aneurysms in patients with SAH and the futility of multiple follow-up examinations in patients with pSAH.810 In 2009, Agid et al8 concluded that digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and subsequent imaging are not required in patients with pSAH after negative CTA. Notwithstanding, practice patterns have been slow to change on the need for initial DSA and extensive angiographic follow-up in these patients.

We performed a retrospective review of patients with pSAH in the past 6 years at our institution. We then performed a meta-analysis of the literature, critically reviewing the follow-up studies in patients with pSAH, to assess the use of follow-up imaging for aneurysm detection in patients with pSAH.

Methods

Institutional Study

A retrospective keyword search was performed for reports containing the words perimesencephalic, prepontine, or pretruncal in the past 6 years at our single, large, multisite, academic institution after obtaining Institutional Review Board approval with waiver of consent. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with perimesencephalic pattern of blood on initial noncontrast CT undergoing CTA and DSA within 24 hours of admission and additional follow-up angiographic imaging. Patients with history of trauma, diffuse SAH, thick blood above the perimesencephalic cistern, and intraventricular blood were excluded. Two-hundred fourteen CTA reports met keyword search criteria. Images from these reports were reviewed to determine whether the hemorrhage pattern met the above-described definition of pSAH. A total of 18 patients met inclusion criteria. The number and types of follow-up imaging studies, including CT/CTAs, MRI/magnetic resonance angiograms (MRAs), DSAs, and transcranial Dopplers, performed on these patients were tabulated. All initial and follow-up studies were evaluated for intracranial aneurysm by an experienced neuroradiologist. Follow-up studies were assessed for any positive diagnostic yield.

All CTA examinations were performed on 64-section multidetector CT scanners (General Electric Lightspeed, Milwaukee, WI) using similar protocols. Scanning was performed from the base of C2 to the calvarial vertex. Intravenous contrast, iohexol (Omnipaque 300/350; Nycomed Amersham, Oslo, Norway), was administered by using a dual-power injector with an injection rate of 4 mL/s for a total volume of 60 mL for Omnipaque 350 and 75 mL for Omnipaque 300 and then followed by a saline chaser of 80 mL. The SmartPrep technique (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) was used to adequately time the bolus of contrast. The protocol for data acquisition was helical mode, 0.5-s gantry rotation time, 32×0.625-mm collimation, 0.5 to 1 pitch, 0.625-mm section thickness, and 0.315-mm reconstruction interval. Acquisition parameters were 100 to 120 kV and 300 to 660 mA, a head filter with a display field of view of 15 cm, and a standard reconstruction algorithm. Images were reformatted in axial, sagittal, and coronal 2.5-mm-thick maximum intensity projections with 50% overlap, as well as 3-dimensional (3D) surface-rendered and volume-rendered reconstructions, using Advantage Workstation (GE Healthcare) and Vitrea 2 workstation (Vital Images, Plymouth, MA).

DSA was performed by using a single dedicated biplane neuroangiographic unit (Siemens Axiom Artis zee; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with an image intensifier matrix of 1024×1024 pixels. Cerebral angiography included rotational spin angiography with 3D reconstructions (DynaCT; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Intravenous contrast, iohexol (Omnipaque 240; Nycomed Amersham, Oslo, Norway), was injected with a dual-power injector.

Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis was performed based on literature search for patients with pSAH with imaging follow-up. A keyword search was performed with terms subarachnoid hemorrhage (MeSH) (perimesencephal* or pretrunc* or [angiogra* and negative] or [angiogra* and occult] or mesencephalon [MeSH]) and cerebral angiography (MeSH) in Medline (241 entries), Embase (593 entries), Cochrane Library (116 entries), Scopus (147 entries), and Web of Science (403 entries). These 1500 search results from the 5 major databases and related articles for additional references not in our initial search results were reviewed for relevance. Studies with no follow-up studies performed, <5 patients with pSAH, unspecified percentage of patients lost to follow-up, and those with cerebrospinal fluid xanthochromia without pSAH on CT were excluded. In cases of disagreement between the authors on which studies should be included in the analysis, consensus was reached by discussion. A flowchart of the search is presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flow chart of meta-analysis search.

Our final analysis included 40 studies, including our institutional data, with 2 articles in German.68,11–46 Articles were evaluated on the number of patients with pSAH, the modality of initial and follow-up imaging, and their yield. Patients were grouped into those with DSA only, with CTA only, and those with both DSA and CTA as initial studies. These 3 groups were then subgrouped if their follow-up studies were DSA only, CTA only, or DSA and CTA combined. The MRI/MRA follow-up was not included because of its lower sensitivity.47 Age and sex data were recorded when available, and the overall sex ratio and mean age were calculated based on only studies with demographic information specific to the pSAH group. Neurological deficits and outcomes were not evaluated. All statistical analyses were performed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and SPSS software version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Two-way ANOVA of the aneurysm detection rate based on initial and follow-up protocols was used to evaluate the effects of each initial and follow-up imaging strategy. Continuous variables (aneurysm detection rate, age, and sex ratios) were expressed as the mean±SD or the median with a range, and categorical variables (number of studies and work-ups) were expressed as counts and percentages. The 95% confidence intervals for each subgroup were calculated using the normal approximation interval. The heterogeneity of studies included in meta-analysis was analyzed by using the I2 analysis based on continuous χ2 statistics. The risks of bias within individual studies and across studies were also assessed.

Results

Institutional Study

Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria for isolated pSAH (Figure 2). Ten men and 8 women had a mean age of 49.3±13.1 years. All patients had initial negative CTAs and DSAs and subsequently underwent extensive follow-ups, including DSA, CTA, MRA, transcranial Doppler, and miscellaneous studies, such as MRA of neck.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Computed tomographic (CT) scan of a patient from institutional study: a 46-year-old woman presenting with thunderclap headache. Noncontrast CT showed hyperdense blood centering in the prepontine cistern and extending to the bilateral ambient and quadrigeminal cistern with mild ventricular dilation.

There were a total of 38 follow-up CT/CTAs, 20 MRI/MRAs, and 16 DSAs, resulting in an average of 2.11 CT/CTAs, 1.11 MRI/MRAs, and 0.89 DSAs per patient. No aneurysms (or other culprit vascular lesions) were detected on any of the follow-up imaging. Sixteen transcranial Dopplers performed in 8 patients showed mild middle cerebral artery vasospasms in 4 patients, which all spontaneously resolved without intervention. No patients had clinically significant hydrocephalus.

Meta-Analysis

A total of 1440 patients were included in the 40 studies (including our institutional review) with a male:female ratio of 55.6:44.4 and a mean age of 51.9 years. Thousand and thirty-one of these 1440 patients had follow-up imaging, with DSA, CTA, or both DSA and CTA. Of these 1031 patients, a total of 8 aneurysms in 8 patients were reported to be first discovered on follow-up imaging in 6 studies. This corresponds to a reported rate of aneurysm first detected on follow-up imaging of 0.78% (95% confidence interval, 0.23%–1.32%), with subgroup analysis as described in the Table and Figure 3.

Table. Aneurysm Detection Rate by Subgroups Based on the Meta-Analysis Result

Initial DSAInitial CTAInitial DSA and CTA
Follow-up DSA0.90% (95% CI, 0.18%–1.62%)01.64% (95% CI, 0%–3.89%)
Follow-up CTA0No cases reported0
Follow-up DSA and CTA0No cases reported0

CI indicates confidence interval; CTA, computed tomographic angiography; and DSA, digital subtraction angiography.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Reported aneurysm detection rate of meta-analysis grouped by initial+follow-up studies. CTA indicates computed tomographic angiography; and DSA, digital subtraction angiography.

The 2-way ANOVA test yielded a P value of 0.353 for the 3 initial diagnostic strategies, 0.701 for the 3 follow-up strategies, and 0.916 for the interaction term of initial and follow-up strategies. There was no statistically significant benefit of performing DSA during the initial evaluation or of any follow-up angiographic studies. The I2 test recommended by Cochrane Reviews to assess inconsistency in meta-analysis yielded 16.6%, reflecting low heterogeneity among the meta-analysis studies.48 All studies included in the meta-analysis were retrospective reviews of institutional experiences, leading to low risks of bias both within and across individual studies.

Discussion

Patients with pSAH typically present with minimal clinical symptoms (Hunt and Hess scale 1), no focal neurological deficits, and no loss of consciousness.49 The isolated perimesencephalic pattern has a better prognosis than other subtypes of SAH, with hydrocephalus and symptomatic vasospasm being decidedly uncommon on follow-up.45,50

Although the cause of pSAH remains elusive, multiple studies have suggested a venous origin for a majority of pSAH cases. Because 10% of posterior circulation aneurysms present with a perimesencephalic bleeding pattern, some angiographic imaging is essential, but the use of additional angiographic studies is debated.57,51–54

Controversy centers around how frequently aneurysms are not present on the initial CTA and are only detected on follow-up angiographic examinations, despite multiple studies showing that CTA is sensitive in detecting small aneurysms (including those in posterior circulation sometimes responsible for pSAH).30,53,55,56

Rinkel et al57,58 suggested that patients with pSAH did not need follow-up DSA after initial negative findings on DSA in 1991. Two years later, they suggested that DSA was not needed at either initial or follow-up imaging in patients with pSAH with negative CTA findings.59 This recommendation was further corroborated by Ruigrok et al60 in 2000, who determined that CTA without additional follow-up was the best diagnostic strategy compared with no angiographic work-up, DSA without follow-up, and CTA with DSA follow-up to exclude aneurysms in patients with pSAH using a mathematical model.

In 2006, Kershenovich et al61 performed a retrospective review of 30 patients with pSAH with negative initial CTA that had multiple subsequent DSAs and found no aneurysms on either initial or follow-up DSA studies, concluding that no follow-up studies were necessary. Westerlaan et al30 in 2007 arrived at the same conclusion after reviewing 30 patients with pSAH and showing no false-negative CTAs. Agid et al8 corroborated these findings in 2009, where all 93 patients with pSAH with negative initial CTA had no aneurysms detected on follow-up. Retrospective reviews by Delgado et al11 in 2013 (11 patients), Moscovici et al16 in 2013 (25 patients), Zhong et al45 in 2014 (49 patients), and Yap et al6265 in 2014 (41 patients) and of our institutional data of 18 patients have been performed, and none showed positive findings at DSA or any follow-up imaging studies.

Review of our institutional data with negative CTAs showed no additional benefits of initial DSA or of any follow-up angiographic imaging because no aneurysms were detected in any of these studies. Our meta-analysis of 40 studies, with a total of 1031 patients, also does not demonstrate any additional benefit of performing DSA after a negative CTA at the time of diagnosis and of any angiographic follow-up studies.

The 40 studies in the meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled follow-up detection rate of 0.78% (95% confidence interval, 0.23%–1.32%), which is significantly lower than the often-quoted 1.5% to 3.4% aneurysm detection rate in patients with pSAH on follow-up studies, both based on a single positive case of 29 by Degaldo et al22 and 65 by Jung et al.27

Six of the 40 studies described 8 aneurysms and 2 additional vascular abnormalities reported first on follow-up imaging.12,21,22,27,36,38

Andaluz et al12 ascribed 3 pSAH cases to aneurysms in the anterior circulation, 1 to fibromuscular dysplasia, and the last to a dysplastic basilar terminus. They acknowledged that the fibromuscular dysplasia and dysplastic basilar terminus cases were unconfirmed sources of pSAH. They also conceded that the retrospective review showed aneurysms to be present in the initial study in some cases.12 Maslehaty et al21 ascribed 1 pSAH case to an aneurysm of superior cerebellar artery; however, they did not discuss whether this aneurysm was seen on the initial study. Jung et al27 ascribed 1 pSAH case to an aneurysm of anterior communicating artery, and they were not specific about whether this aneurysm could be seen in the initial study. Anterior circulation aneurysms described by Andaluz et al12 and Jung et al27 are unlikely to be the causes of pSAH and are likely to be incidental findings. Delgado et al22 and Ringelstein et al38 both ascribed single pSAH cases to an aneurysm of the superior cerebellar artery. Ringelstein et al38 acknowledged that the superior cerebellar artery demonstrated an irregularity on the initial study, whereas Delgado et al22 stated that the aneurysm was not present initially. Both these studies had DSA as the initial evaluation, and given the images provided in these 2 articles, the bolus and the technique (magnification and obliquity) seem different between the initial and follow-up studies. The lack of adequate retrospective review and description renders these initially occult follow-up positive findings of questionable validity. Little et al36 ascribed 1 pSAH case to an aneurysm of the superior cerebellar artery, which was not seen on the initial DSA imaging. A summary table of these 6 articles is presented in Table I in the online-only Data Supplement. The actual positive rate on follow-up imaging is therefore likely to be even lower than the above-reported rate of 0.78%.

The use of follow-up is dependent on the negative predictive value (false-negatives) of the initial angiographic study. Previous articles have ascribed various sensitivities to CTA using DSA as the reference gold standard, ranging from 92.3% to 96%, with a 61% sensitivity for ≤3-mm aneurysms. These studies did not discriminate between 16- and 64-row fourth- and fifth-generation CTA scanners and older equipment.66,67 Modern 16- and 64-row scanners offer a submillimeter resolution of 0.5 to 0.7 mm per detector row.4 Previous articles have used the poorer negative predictive values of CTA as a justification for performing additional DSA imaging at the time of diagnosis and multiple follow-up angiographic studies. Newer 64-row CTA scanners have been shown to have an overall per patient aneurysm detection sensitivity and specificity of 99.2%, with 94% sensitivity for aneurysms <4 mm.4 We chose to use these sensitivity and specificity values because currently 16- and 64-slice scanners are the most commonly used equipment.68 In addition, all CTA sensitivity and specificity values are based on unspecified DSA technique and equipment, which is an imperfect gold standard. DSA is operator technique– and interpretation-dependent in contrast to CTA that is primarily interpretation-dependent. Monoplane DSA has been described as having a false-negative rate of 7.1% when compared with second examination.37 Even biplane DSA has been shown to miss a significant number of <3-mm aneurysms that can be seen on 3D rotational angiography.69

Inter- and intraobserver disagreement on whether an SAH pattern is perimesencephalic or diffuse has been cited as a reason to pursue follow-up imaging. Brinjikji et al70 found that in the 7 of 8 cases in which there was disagreement on the hemorrhage pattern, the pattern represented diffuse SAH instead of an isolated pSAH pattern. We agree with Agid et al8 that whenever a case is ambiguous, it should be regarded as a diffuse aneurysmal pattern. Adoption of this methodology and strict adherence to defining criteria for pSAH should result in minimal intra- and interobserver disagreement. Velthuis et al,71 who were the first to propose withholding DSA when the patient had a negative CTA, specifically emphasized the importance of maintaining a strict definition of pSAH.

Many studies included in our meta-analysis did not specify the technical parameters used by CTA or DSA. However, this may serve to strengthen our conclusion because angiographic studies performed on older equipment have poorer negative predictive values.

Patients with pSAH have a normal life expectancy and are not at risk of rebleeding.72 A meta-analysis of 50 studies, pooling >4000 patients, shows that rather than repeating the actual study, reinterpretation by a second reader achieves similar results and avoids procedure complications.73 A cost-effectiveness analysis of angiographic imaging in patients with pSAH also shows limited use of multiple follow-up imaging studies.74

Repeat imaging can be considered in patients in whom the clinical picture is not consistent with pSAH. Vasospasm and hydrocephalus are infrequent with pSAH.45,50 Given the excellent sensitivity and the noninvasive nature of CTA, repeat imaging may be performed preferentially using CTA.74

Conclusions

Our institutional study shows no use of initial DSA and of any follow-up angiographic imaging in patients with pSAH with a negative CTA. Our meta-analysis, comprising 40 studies, including our institutional data, and totaling 1031 patients, demonstrates 6 studies with 8 aneurysms seen on follow-up imaging. As discussed above, some of these are of questionable validity.

Given the excellent negative predictive value of modern 16- and 64-row CT scanners, we agree that an initial negative CTA suffices for patients with a strictly defined pSAH pattern when the clinical picture is consistent.8 Partial thrombosis and recanalization and growth in a dissecting pseudoaneurysm are potential reasons for missing aneurysms on initial imaging, and follow-up imaging may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Footnotes

Presented in part at the American Society of Neuroradiology 52nd Annual Meeting, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, May 17–22, 2014.

The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007370/-/DC1.

Correspondence to Ajay Malhotra, MD, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail

References

  • 1. van Gijn J, van Dongen KJ, Vermeulen M, Hijdra A. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage: a nonaneurysmal and benign form of subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurology. 1985; 35:493–497.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Flaherty ML, Haverbusch M, Kissela B, Kleindorfer D, Schneider A, Sekar P, et al.. Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, and outcome.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005; 14:267–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2005.07.004.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Wang H, Li W, He H, Luo L, Chen C, Guo Y. 320-detector row CT angiography for detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.Clin Radiol. 2013; 68:e15–e20. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.09.001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Menke J, Larsen J, Kallenberg K. Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis.Ann Neurol. 2011; 69:646–654. doi: 10.1002/ana.22270.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Alén JF, Lagares A, Lobato RD, Gómez PA, Rivas JJ, Ramos A. Comparison between perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by posterior circulation aneurysms.J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:529–535. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.3.0529.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Topcuoglu MA, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS, Buonanno FS, Koroshetz WJ, Singhal AB. Subarachnoid hemorrhage without evident cause on initial angiography studies: diagnostic yield of subsequent angiography and other neuroimaging tests.J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:1235–1240. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.6.1235.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Urbach H, Zentner J, Solymosi L. The need for repeat angiography in subarachnoid haemorrhage.Neuroradiology. 1998; 40:6–10.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Agid R, Andersson T, Almqvist H, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, terBrugge KG, et al.. Negative CT angiography findings in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: When is digital subtraction angiography still needed?AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:696–705. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1884.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Pechlivanis I, Shang F, Harders A, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Nölte I, Schmieder K. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage and vessel variants.Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2011; 72:78–83. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268500.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Kokkinis C, Vlychou M, Zavras GM, Hadjigeorgiou GM, Papadimitriou A, Fezoulidis IV. The role of 3D-computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA) in investigation of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and surgical findings.Br J Neurosurg. 2008; 22:71–78. doi: 10.1080/02688690701713862.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Delgado Almandoz JE, Crandall BM, Fease JL, Scholz JM, Anderson RE, Kadkhodayan Y, et al.. Diagnostic yield of catheter angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and negative initial noninvasive neurovascular examinations.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34:833–839. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3291.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M. Yield of further diagnostic work-up of cryptogenic subarachnoid hemorrhage based on bleeding patterns on computed tomographic scans.Neurosurgery. 2008; 62:1040–1046. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325865.22011.1f.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Cánovas D, Gil A, Jato M, de Miquel M, Rubio F. Clinical outcome of spontaneous non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in 108 patients.Eur J Neurol. 2012; 19:457–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03542.x.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Cruz JP, Sarma D, Noel de Tilly L. Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: when to stop imaging?Emerg Radiol. 2011; 18:197–202. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-0939-6.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Dalyai R, Chalouhi N, Theofanis T, Jabbour PM, Dumont AS, Gonzalez LF, et al.. Subarachnoid hemorrhage with negative initial catheter angiography: a review of 254 cases evaluating patient clinical outcome and efficacy of short- and long-term repeat angiography.Neurosurgery. 2013; 72:646–652.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Moscovici S, Fraifeld S, Ramirez-de-Noriega F, Rosenthal G, Leker RR, Itshayek E, et al.. Clinical relevance of negative initial angiogram in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurol Res. 2013; 35:117–122. doi: 10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000147.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Kang DH, Park J, Lee SH, Park SH, Kim YS, Hamm IS. Does non-perimesencephalic type non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage have a benign prognosis?J Clin Neurosci. 2009; 16:904–908. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.10.008.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Gross BA, Lin N, Frerichs KU, Du R. Vasospasm after spontaneous angiographically negative subarachnoid hemorrhage.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012; 154:1127–1133.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Gupta SK, Gupta R, Khosla VK, Mohindra S, Chhabra R, Khandelwal N, et al.. Nonaneurysmal nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: is it a benign entity?Surg Neurol. 2009; 71:566–571.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Kong Y, Zhang JH, Qin X. Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage: risk factors, clinical presentations, and outcome.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011; 110:197–201.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Maslehaty H, Petridis AK, Barth H, Mehdorn HM. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in perimesencephalic and nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage of unknown origin.J Neurosurg. 2011; 114:1003–1007. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS10310.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Delgado Almandoz JE, Jagadeesan BD, Refai D, Moran CJ, Cross DT, Chicoine MR, et al.. Diagnostic yield of repeat catheter angiography in patients with catheter and computed tomography angiography negative subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery. 2012; 70:1135–1142. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318242575e.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Khan AA, Smith JD, Kirkman MA, Robertson FJ, Wong K, Dott C, et al.. Angiogram negative subarachnoid haemorrhage: outcomes and the role of repeat angiography.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013; 115:1470–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.002.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Boswell S, Thorell W, Gogela S, Lyden E, Surdell D. Angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcomes data and review of the literature.J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 22:750–757. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.02.001.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Lin N, Zenonos G, Kim AH, Nalbach SV, Du R, Frerichs KU, et al.. Angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship between bleeding pattern and clinical outcome.Neurocrit Care. 2012; 16:389–398. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9680-6.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Kelliny M, Maeder P, Binaghi S, Levivier M, Regli L, Meuli R. Cerebral aneurysm exclusion by CT angiography based on subarachnoid hemorrhage pattern: a retrospective study.BMC Neurol. 2011; 11:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-8.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Jung JY, Kim YB, Lee JW, Huh SK, Lee KC. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage with negative initial angiography: a review of 143 cases.J Clin Neurosci. 2006; 13:1011–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.09.007.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Khan N, Schuknecht B, Yonekawa Y. Presentation and management of patients with initial negative 4-vessel cerebral angiography in subarachnoid hemorrhage.Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002; 82:71–81.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Hashimoto H, Iida J, Hironaka Y, Okada M, Sakaki T. Use of spiral computerized tomography angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in whom subtraction angiography did not reveal cerebral aneurysms.J Neurosurg. 2000; 92:278–283. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0278.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Westerlaan HE, Gravendeel J, Fiore D, Metzemaekers JD, Groen RJ, Mooij JJ, et al.. Multislice CT angiography in the selection of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms suitable for clipping or coiling.Neuroradiology. 2007; 49:997–1007. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0293-2.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Hui FK, Tumialán LM, Tanaka T, Cawley CM, Zhang YJ. Clinical differences between angiographically negative, diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage and perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurocrit Care. 2009; 11:64–70. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9203-2.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Canhao P, Ferro JM, Pinto AN, Melo TP, Campos JG. Perimesencephalic and nonperimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhages with negative angiograms.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995; 132:14–19.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Wijdicks EF, Schievink WI, Miller GM. Pretruncal nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Mayo Clin Proc. 1998; 73:745–752. doi: 10.4065/73.8.745.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Van Calenbergh F, Plets C, Goffin J, Velghe L. Nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prevalence of perimesencephalic hemorrhage in a consecutive series.Surg Neurol. 1993; 39:320–323.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Weyerbrock A, Woznica M, Rosahl SK, Berlis A. Aneurysmal and non-aneurysmal SAH–is initial computed tomography predictive?Rofo. 2009; 181:881–887. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109355.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Little AS, Garrett M, Germain R, Farhataziz N, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al.. Evaluation of patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and negative angiography.Neurosurgery. 2007; 61:1139–1150.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Yu DW, Jung YJ, Choi BY, Chang CH. Subarachnoid hemorrhage with negative baseline digital subtraction angiography: is repeat digital subtraction angiography necessary?J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2012; 14:210–215. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2012.14.3.210.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38. Ringelstein A, Mueller O, Timochenko O, Moenninghoff C, Sure U, Forsting M, et al.. Reangiography after perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Der Nervenarzt. 2013; 84:715–719.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39. Fontanella M, Rainero I, Panciani PP, Schatlo B, Benevello C, Garbossa D, et al.. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and negative angiography: clinical course and long-term follow-up.Neurosurg Rev. 2011; 34:477–484. doi: 10.1007/s10143-011-0323-8.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Muller-Forell W, Welschehold S, Kohler J, Schicketanz KH. Subarachnoid hemorrhage without aneurysm.Der Radiologe. 2002; 42:871–879.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41. Goergen SK, Barrie D, Sacharias N, Waugh JR. Perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage: negative angiography and favourable prognosis.Australas Radiol. 1993; 37:156–160.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42. Berdoz D, Uske A, de Tribolet N. Subarachnoid haemorrhage of unknown cause: clinical, neuroradiological and evolutive aspects.J Clin Neurosci. 1998; 5:274–282.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Sarabia R, Lagares A, Fernandez-Alen JA, Arikan F, Vilalta J, Ibanez J, et al.. Idiopathic subarachnoid hemorrhage: a multicentre series of 220 patients.Neurocirugia (Astur). 2010; 21:441–451.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44. Yin L. Clinical features of the perimesencephalic non-aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a report of 35 cases (abstract).Presented at the 16th Congress of the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Stockholm, Sweden, September 9, 2012.Google Scholar
  • 45. Zhong W, Zhao P, Wang D, Li G, Sun H, Chen H, et al.. Different clinical characteristics between perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage and diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage with negative initial angiography.Turk Neurosurg. 2014; 24:327–332. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.7253-12.1.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46. Agarwal SL, Shao B, Claasen J, Mayer S, Schmidt M, Lee K, et al.. Diagnostic yield of MR-cervical spine imaging and second-look digital subtraction angiography in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage with unknown source [abstract].Neurocritical Care Society, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 22, 2011, Number 13.Google Scholar
  • 47. Sailer AM, Wagemans BA, Nelemans PJ, de Graaf R, van Zwam WH. Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis.Stroke. 2014; 45:119–126. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 48. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.BMJ. 2003; 327:557–560.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49. Brilstra EH, Hop JW, Rinkel GJ. Quality of life after perimesencephalic haemorrhage.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 63:382–384.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50. Raya A, Zipfel GJ, Diringer MN, Dacey RG, Derdeyn CP, Rich KM, et al.. Pattern not volume of bleeding predicts angiographic vasospasm in nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke. 2014; 45:265–267. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002629.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 51. Kallmes DF, Clark HP, Dix JE, Cloft HJ, Evans AJ, Dion JE, et al.. Ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms: frequency of the nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic pattern of hemorrhage on CT scans.Radiology. 1996; 201:657–660. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939211.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52. Canhão P, Falcão F, Pinho e Melo T, Ferro H, Ferro J. Vascular risk factors for perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.J Neurol. 1999; 246:492–496.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53. Pinto AN, Ferro JM, Canhao P, Campos J. How often is a perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage CT pattern caused by ruptured aneurysms?Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993; 124:79–81.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 54. Schwartz TH, Solomon RA. Perimesencephalic nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: review of the literature.Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:433–440.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 55. Villablanca JP, Achiriolaie A, Hooshi P, Martin N, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, et al.. Aneurysms of the posterior circulation: detection and treatment planning using volume-rendered three-dimensional helical computerized tomography angiography.J Neurosurg. 2005; 103:1018–1029. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.6.1018.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 56. Villablanca JP, Jahan R, Hooshi P, Lim S, Duckwiler G, Patel A, et al.. Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23:1187–1198.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 57. van der Schaaf IC, Velthuis BK, Gouw A, Rinkel GJ. Venous drainage in perimesencephalic hemorrhage.Stroke. 2004; 35:1614–1618. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000131657.08655.ce.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 58. Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Hasan D, Kienstra GE, Franke CL, Hageman LM, et al.. Outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and negative angiography according to pattern of haemorrhage on computed tomography.Lancet. 1991; 338:964–968.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 59. Rinkel GJ, van Gijn J, Wijdicks EF. Subarachnoid hemorrhage without detectable aneurysm. A review of the causes.Stroke. 1993; 24:1403–1409.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 60. Ruigrok YM, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E, Velthuis BK, van Gijn J. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage and CT angiography: a decision analysis.Stroke. 2000; 31:2976–2983.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 61. Kershenovich A, Rappaport ZH, Maimon S. Brain computed tomography angiographic scans as the sole diagnostic examination for excluding aneurysms in patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery. 2006; 59:798–801.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 62. Delgado Almandoz JE, Kadkhodayan Y, Crandall BM, Scholz JM, Fease JL, Anderson RE, et al.. Diagnostic yield of delayed neurovascular imaging in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, negative initial CT and catheter angiograms, and a negative 7 day repeat catheter angiogram.J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; 6:637–642. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010896.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 63. Yap LC, Dyde R, Hodgson T, Patel USpontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and negative initial vascular imaging: should further investigation depend upon the pattern of hemorrhage on the presenting computed tomography? [abstract].American Society of Neuroradiology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May, 2014, O33.Google Scholar
  • 64. Jeun B KV, Durand D, Matouk C, Malhotra AUtility of follow-up imaging in isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage [abstract].American Society of Neuroradiology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May, 2014, EP90.Google Scholar
  • 65. Rawal SC, Krings T, Shah PDelayed angiogram in angiography-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract].American Society of Neuroradiology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May, 2014, O34.Google Scholar
  • 66. White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review.Radiology. 2000; 217:361–370. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv06361.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 67. McKinney AM, Palmer CS, Truwit CL, Karagulle A, Teksam M. Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:594–602. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0848.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 68. Finger Lakes Region CT Capacity and Utilization Report, 2012. New York, NY: Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency; 2013.Google Scholar
  • 69. van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M. 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:976–979. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0964.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 70. Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, White JB, Lanzino G, Morris JM, Cloft HJ. Inter- and intraobserver agreement in CT characterization of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31:1103–1105. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1988.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 71. Velthuis BK, Rinkel GJ, Ramos LM, Witkamp TD, van Leeuwen MS. Perimesencephalic hemorrhage. Exclusion of vertebrobasilar aneurysms with CT angiography.Stroke. 1999; 30:1103–1109.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 72. Greebe P, Rinkel GJ. Life expectancy after perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke. 2007; 38:1222–1224. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260093.49693.7a.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 73. Westerlaan HE, van Dijk JM, Jansen-van der Weide MC, de Groot JC, Groen RJ, Mooij JJ, et al.. Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis--systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiology. 2011; 258:134–145.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 74. Kalra VB, Wu X, Forman HP, Malhotra A. Cost-effectiveness of angiographic imaging in isolated perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke. 2014; 45:3576–3582. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006679.Google Scholar