Skip main navigation
×

Predictive Value of Susceptibility Vessel Sign for Arterial Recanalization and Clinical Improvement in Ischemic Stroke

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022912Stroke. 2019;50:512–515

Abstract

Background and Purpose—

Our goal was to evaluate whether the presence of a low signal intensity known as susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*-gradient echo imaging sequence was predictive of arterial recanalization and the early clinical improvement after mechanical thrombectomy.

Methods—

This observational study was based on a prospective database of acute ischemic strokes treated by mechanical thrombectomy. Inclusion criteria were patients with acute anterior ischemic stroke, diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging, including a T2*-gradient echo imaging sequence, and treated by mechanical thrombectomy. Two independent readers assessed the presence of an SVS. Successful recanalization was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3 after mechanical thrombectomy. Early clinical improvement was estimated by the difference between the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on day 1 after treatment

Results—

The SVS was detected in 137 (76%) out of 180 patients. The kappa interrater agreement was 0.71 with a 95% CI of 0.59 to 0.82. Successful recanalization was associated with an SVS+ with odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.05–5.74; P=0.03. The early clinical improvement was better in patients with an SVS+ (median, −6; interquartile range, −11 to 0) compared with SVS− patients (median, −1; interquartile range, −10 to 3) with P=0.01.

Conclusions—

The visualization of SVS is a reliable and easily accessible predictive factor of recanalization success and early clinical improvement.

The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVOAIS) of the anterior circulation has been established by several randomized trials.1 However, in these series, thrombectomy failed to obtain a successful recanalization (SR), as defined by Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2B/3, in 11 to 41% of the cases. Clots that were retrieved had various macroscopic aspects and histopathologic compositions.2,3 Thrombi with a high level of red blood cells are spontaneously hyperdense on computed tomography and appear with a low signal intensity known as a susceptibility vessel sign (SVS)+ on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2*-gradient echo imaging sequences (T2*-gradient echo imaging).2,4 The SVS is related to the presence of deoxyhemoglobin, which causes inhomogeneities in local magnetic fields and hence signal loss on T2*sequences. Hyperdense clots are associated with SR.2 Previous studies have had controversial results concerning the relationship between SVS+ and SR.2,4–7 Finally, the association between SVS+ and a good clinical outcome has been reported in only one study.5 Our goal was to evaluate whether the presence of an SVS+ was predictive of arterial recanalization and early clinical improvement assessed by the difference between the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the NIHSS on day 1.

Methods

Data Collection

A retrospective review of stroke in the Toulouse biobank database (DC2016-2804) was performed (January 2015–January 2017) using an institutional board–approved protocol. All consecutive LVOAIS with an MRI on admission and treated by MT were included.

Clinical Information

The authors declare that all supporting data are available within the article. Demographic data, the NIHSS score before and 24 hours after treatment, use of IV tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator), and time metrics were collected. Early clinical improvement on day 1 was calculated as NIHSS pretreatment−NIHSS on day 1.

Imaging Data

SVS Analysis

In our center, 3 different MR scans (3T Skyra; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; or 3T Achieva; Philips, Andover; or 1.5T Optima MR350; General Electric Medical System, Boston) were used for LVOAIS diagnosis using a routine clinical protocol. In addition, some drip and ship patients did undergo an MRI in a remote hospital. As previously reported, the presence or absence of the SVS was retrospectively assessed on T2*-gradient echo imaging by 2 independent investigators.5,6 Interrater agreements for SVS+ or SVS− were assessed using the kappa coefficient and a CI of 95% (Figure).

Figure.

Figure. Examples of SVS+ and SVS-. Magnetic resonance imaging of 2 patients presenting with susceptibility vessel sign (SVS)+ (A and B; white arrow) and SVS− (C and D; white arrow with dot). A and C, axial views of T2*-Gradient Echo Planar imaging, (B and D) time of flight.

Endovascular Data

Endovascular procedures were performed on a biplane system (AlluraClarity 20/10; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). SR was assessed with the TICI score and defined as TICI 2b or 3.8

Statistical Analysis

For descriptive analyses, continuous variables were expressed as means±SD or medians and interquartile ranges and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Clinical characteristics were compared between SVS groups: Wilcoxon tests were used for quantitative variables and χ2 tests for qualitative ones. To test if SVS was associated with TICI and early clinical improvement (NIHSS pretreatment−NIHSS on day 1), a logistic regression model and a linear regression model were used (respectively). The first model was adjusted on age, IV tPA, clot location and the second on age, IV tPA, baseline NIHSS, and TICI. These adjustments were based on clinical considerations.

An alpha level of 5% was used. Data were analyzed using SAS software.

Results

From January 2015 to January 2017, 392 MT were performed in our center. Two hundred and fifty-nine of these patients were diagnosed with LVOAIS by MRI, and 180 of them met all the inclusion criteria.

Baseline characteristics are described in the Table.

Table. Descriptive Cohort Characteristics, MRI Data, and Time Metrics

Total%SVS+%SVS−%P Value*
N=180n=137n=43
Age
 Mean±SD68.2±15.967.4±15.770.7±16.50.12
NIHSS
 Mean±SD17±6.316.7±6.416.9±6.00.72
Occlusion
 No tandem14681.110778.13990.70.07
 Tandem3418.93021.949.3
Intracranial clot location (tandem included)
 T ICA3821.12921.2920.90.46
 M111061.18159.12967.4
 M23217.82719.7511.6
IV tPA
 No6234.44532.81739.50.42
 Yes11865.69267.22660.5
Time onset-image
 Median1291291280.65
 IQR89–17290–17176–178
Time groin-recanalization
 Median4543610.3
 IQR29–7930–6629–96
Time onset-recanalization
 Median2732692810.91
 IQR217–344219–340217–347

IQR indicates interquartile range; IV tPA, intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator; M1, first segment of the middle cerebral artery; M2, second segment of the middle cerebral artery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score; SVS, susceptibility vessel sign; and T ICA, terminal internal carotid artery.

2 test for qualitative characteristics and Wilcoxon test for quantitative characteristics.

SVS was present (SVS+) in 137 (76%) out of 180 patients. The kappa interrater agreement for SVS+ or SVS− was calculated as K=0.71 with a 95% CI, 0.59–0.82. IV tPA was used in 118 procedures (66%). SR was achieved in 147 (82%) patients. SVS+ was associated with SR with odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.05–5.74; P=0.03.

Patients with SVS+ had a higher level of early clinical improvement (median, −6; IQR, −11 to 0) compared with SVS− patients (median, −1; IQR, −10 to 3) with a linear regression coefficient of −2.84; 95% CI, −5.37 to −0.30; P=0.03.

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that SVS+ is associated with a higher rate of SR and better early clinical improvement after MT.

Although interrater agreement was inferior to published kappa statistics for SVS+, it was nevertheless satisfactory.5,6,9,10 Most of the disparities between the findings of the 2 investigators were observed when the clot was hypointense in T2* but did not exceed the size of the same contralateral vessel. We observed a similar ratio of SVS+ (76%), compared with the 73% of SVS+ reported in the largest cohorts.7,9

Previous studies that investigated the relationships between SVS+ and SR and MT are controversial. One publication reported an association between SVS+ and SR,6 contrary to 3 other studies which reported the opposite.4,5,9,10 A similar study analyzed the volume of SVS and found no association with SR.10 Our results show that SVS+ is associated with a higher rate of SR (85% versus 69%).

To our knowledge, no study has reported the predictive value of SVS+ on early clinical improvement on day 1. Our results suggest that patients with SVS+ experienced a higher level of improvement in NIHSS than patients with SVS−. We decided not to collect 3 months modified Rankin Scale because of the drip and ship patients (19.4 %), for whom the modified Rankin Scale evaluation could not be performed by stroke neurologist.

Our study has several limitations. In the first instance, an MRI is needed to evaluate the SVS. Even if a 10-minute expedited protocol is used, MRI takes longer than computed tomography in LVOAIS and is not available for a large proportion of stroke patients. Clot analysis was done on routine T2*-gradient echo imaging brain images. Sequences dedicated to clot visualization such as T2* mapping would improve the analysis and might enable quantitative analysis of the clot structure. Finally, the current study is limited by the absence of long-term clinical outcome follow-up that should be evaluated in a further study.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that in our cohort of patients, SVS is an accessible clinical biomarker associated with SR after thrombectomy and early clinical improvement after MT. Multicentric studies with specially dedicated sequences that focus on basal arteries are required to confirm those results.

Footnotes

Correspondence to Jean Darcourt, MD, Service de Neuroradiologie, CHU de Purpan, 1 Pl du Dr Baylac, 31059 Toulouse, France. Email

References

  • 1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al.; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials.Lancet. 2016; 387:1723–1731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-XCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Brinjikji W, Duffy S, Burrows A, Hacke W, Liebeskind D, Majoie CBLM, et al.. Correlation of imaging and histopathology of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke with etiology and outcome: a systematic review.J Neurointerv Surg. 2017; 9:529–534. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012391CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. De Meyer SF, Andersson T, Baxter B, Bendszus M, Brouwer P, Brinjikji W, et al.; Clot Summit Group. Analyses of thrombi in acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement on current knowledge and future directions.Int J Stroke. 2017; 12:606–614. doi: 10.1177/1747493017709671CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Liebeskind DS, Sanossian N, Yong WH, Starkman S, Tsang MP, Moya AL, et al.. CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke.Stroke. 2011; 42:1237–1243. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Bourcier R, Volpi S, Guyomarch B, Daumas-Duport B, Lintia-Gaultier A, Papagiannaki C, et al.. Susceptibility vessel sign on MRI predicts favorable clinical outcome in patients with anterior circulation acute stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36:2346–2353. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4483CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Bourcier R, Brecheteau N, Costalat V, Daumas-Duport B, Guyomarch-Delasalle B, Desal H, et al.. MRI quantitative T2* mapping on thrombus to predict recanalization after endovascular treatment for acute anterior ischemic stroke.J Neuroradiol. 2017; 44:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.03.006CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Bourcier R, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Fahed R, Blanc R, Gory B, et al.; ASTER Trial Investigators. Susceptibility vessel sign in the ASTER trial: higher recanalization rate and more favourable clinical outcome after first line stent retriever compared to contact aspiration.J Stroke. 2018; 20:268–276. doi: 10.5853/jos.2018.00192CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Tomsick T. TIMI, TIBI, TICI: I came, I saw, I got confused.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28:382–384.MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Soize S, Batista AL, Rodriguez Regent C, Trystram D, Tisserand M, Turc G, et al.. Susceptibility vessel sign on T2* magnetic resonance imaging and recanalization results of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers: a multicentre cohort study.Eur J Neurol. 2015; 22:967–972. doi: 10.1111/ene.12693CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Kang DW, Jeong HG, Kim DY, Yang W, Lee SH. Prediction of stroke subtype and recanalization using susceptibility vessel sign on susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Stroke. 2017; 48:1554–1559. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016217LinkGoogle Scholar