Skip to main content
Research Article
Originally Published 6 November 2019
Free Access

Circulating Circular RNAs as Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—

Circular RNAs (CircRNAs) show promise as stroke biomarkers because of their participation in various pathophysiological processes associated with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and stability in peripheral blood.

Methods—

A circRNA microarray was used to identify differentially expressed circulating circRNAs in a discovery cohort (3 versus 3). Validation (36 versus 36) and replication (200 versus 100) were performed in independent cohorts by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Platelets, lymphocytes, and granulocytes were separated from blood to examine the origins of circRNAs.

Results—

There were 3 upregulated circRNAs in Chinese population–based AIS patients compared with healthy controls. The combination of 3 circRNAs resulted in an area under the curve of 0.875, corresponding to a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 71.5% in AIS diagnosis. Furthermore, the combination of change rate in 3 circRNAs within the first 7 days of treatment showed an area under the curve of 0.960 in predicting stroke outcome. There was significant increase in lymphocytes and granulocytes for circPDS5B (circular RNA PDS5B) and only in granulocytes for circCDC14A (circular RNA CDC14A) in AIS patients compared with healthy controls.

Conclusions—

Three circRNAs could serve as biomarkers for AIS diagnosis and prediction of stroke outcomes. The elevated levels of circPDS5B and circCDC14A after stroke might be because of increased levels in lymphocytes and granulocytes.
The global burden of stroke has been increasing, with the stroke prevalence in 2013 almost double that in 1990.1 Although magnetic resonance imaging provides an accurate diagnosis for stroke, previous studies have identified some candidate blood biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis during the acute phase of stroke,2–4 serving as an attractive tool for selecting therapeutic strategies, improving prognostic assessments and identifying therapeutic targets.
Our previous study demonstrated that circular RNA (circRNAs) have functional roles relating to ischemic brain injury.5–7 With this background, the aim of our study was to identify and validate those differentially expressed circRNAs in stroke patients and to investigate their potential as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The ethics committee of the Affiliated Jiangsu Province Hospital and Zhongda Hospital approved this research protocol (approval ID: 2016-SR-235), and the participants or their legally authorized representatives provided written informed consent to participate in the study. Detailed Methods section is available in the online-only Data Supplement.

Study Population

Patients with suspected ischemic stroke were recruited within 72 hours of symptom onset from the Neurology and Emergency Departments of Zhongda Hospital and Jiangsu Province Hospital. The enrollment period was November 2017 to February 2019. Blood samples were collected immediately on admission before any treatment. All patients had a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke as defined by an acute focal neurological deficit in combination with a diffusion-weighted imaging-positive lesion on magnetic resonance imaging or a new lesion on a delayed computed tomography scan. Healthy controls (HCs) were recruited from the physical examination centers of 2 hospitals. For all samples involved in our research, we excluded AIS patients and HCs with active malignant diseases or neurological and psychiatric diseases, those who underwent surgery within the last 3 months, and those who took prior medication with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin within the last month. After inclusion, clinical and radiological data were collected on standardized forms. Vitals were collected at hospital admission.

Results

Discovery, Validation, and Replication of Differentially Expressed circRNAs

The characteristics and baseline information of 3 cohorts are listed in Table I in the online-only Data Supplement. A circRNA microarray analysis involving 10 798 circRNAs was conducted in the discovery cohort (GEO accession number: GSE133768; Figure 1A). Next, 68 downregulated circRNAs and 10 upregulated circRNAs (fold change > 4, P<0.05) were validated in an independent validation cohort using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Table II and Table III in the online-only Data Supplement). Among them, 3 circRNAs were differentially regulated and showed consistent directionality with the results of the circRNA microarray (Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement). For the replication cohort, the copy numbers per microliter of plasma were calculated based on the Ct values. Three circRNAs (circFUNDC1 [circular RNA FUNDC1], circPDS5B [circular RNA PDS5B], and circCDC14A [circular RNA CDC14A]) showed significantly elevated expression levels in AIS patients compared with HCs (Figure 1B). Next, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare the copy numbers of circRNAs in AIS patients and HCs (Figure 1C). The combination of 3 circRNAs resulted in an area under the curve of 0.875, corresponding to a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 71.5% in AIS diagnosis. Moreover, there is positive correlation between circRNA levels and cerebral infarct volume (Figure 1D).
Figure 1. Validation, replication, and the diagnostic utility of circular RNAs (circRNAs). A, The volcano plot on the left side shows microarray results for the comparison of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients vs healthy controls (HCs.) Green dots represent downregulated circRNAs (n=68), and red dots (n=10) represent upregulated circRNAs. The flowchart on the right side illustrates the 3-stage approach involving 3 independent cohorts for discovery, validation, and replication. B, Copy numbers per microliter of plasma obtained in the independent replication cohort (n=100/200). Median±interquartile range, linear multivariate model after the identification of covariates by backward stepwise regression. C, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated using the baseline levels of circRNAs based on the replication cohort as the training set for differentiating patients with AIS and HCs. D, Relationship of circRNA expression levels with infarct volume. Linear regression analysis. circCDC14A indicates circular RNA CDC14A; CircFUNDC1, circular RNA FUNDC1; circPDS5B, circular RNA PDS5B; and qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Value of circRNA Levels in Predicting Stroke Outcome

Next, we further explored the significance of circRNA levels in predicting stroke outcome. Poor significance was observed merely depending on the baseline levels of circRNAs (Figure II in the online-only Data Supplement). Because there were opposite variation tendencies in stroke patients with good outcomes (Figure 2A) versus poor outcomes (Figure 2B), we further explored the association between the changes of circRNA levels within the first 7 days of hospitalization and stroke outcome. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated based on the change in values of the circRNAs between admission and the seventh day after admission to predict outcome (Figure 2C), calculated an area under the curve at 0.941 for the combination of 3 circRNAs. Furthermore, stroke outcome was predicted by the changing rates of circRNAs that further increased the predictive significance of 3 circRNAs with area under the curve at 0.960 (Figure 2D).
Figure 2. Temporal expression profiles of circular RNAs (circRNAs) subtyped according to modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months after stroke and their values in predicting outcome. A, For patients with mRS scores between 0 and 2 (good outcome); (B) for patients with mRS scores between 3 and 6 (poor outcome); paired Wilcoxon test, **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated (C) based on the Δ value (copy number/μL on the seventh day minus copy number/μL on the first day) of circRNAs or (D) were evaluated by the changing rate (Δ value/copy number on the first day) of AIS patients. AUC indicates area under the curve; circCDC14A, circular RNA CDC14A; CircFUNDC1, circular RNA FUNDC1; and circPDS5B, circular RNA PDS5B.

Possible Cellular Source and Relative Expression of circRNAs in Different Blood Cells

No significant increase of circFUNDC1 levels was found in platelets, lymphocytes, or granulocytes for AIS patients compared with HCs (Figure 3A). There was no significant change in platelets between stroke patients and controls, whereas the levels of circPDS5B in lymphocytes and granulocytes were significantly higher in stroke patients than in controls and showed consistent tendencies with the levels in plasma (Figure 3B). For the level of circCDC14A (Figure 3C), there is significant increase in granulocytes but not in platelets and lymphocytes.
Figure 3. Expression profiles of 3 circular RNAs in blood cells of stroke patients and controls. quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of the expression profiles of (A) circFUNDC1 (circular RNA FUNDC1), (B) circPDS5B (circular RNA PDS5B), and (C) circCDC14A (circular RNA CDC14A) in platelets, lymphocytes, and granulocytes in the control group (n=41) and in stroke patients (n=41). Data represent the median±interquartile range, Mann-Whitney U test. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Pathophysiological processes that might be controlled by circRNAs after stroke according to bioinformatics analysis were listed in Figure III in the online-only Data Supplement.

Discussion

Our research had 3 main findings: (1) there were significant increased levels of circFUNDC1, circPDS5B, and circCDC14A in plasma of AIS patients compared with the HCs, and their levels were positively correlated with infarct volume, suggesting the 3 circRNAs may be envisioned as potential biomarkers for AIS diagnosis. (2) The opposite change trends of circRNAs in AIS patients with favorable versus poor outcome furtherly illustrated that the change rate in circRNAs within the first 7 days of treatment could serve as a potential biomarker for predicting stroke outcome. (3) Elevations of circPDS5B and circCDC14A in plasma might be derived from lymphocytes and granulocytes.
In general, the method used in our study is well organized, and the remarkable changed circRNAs are novel in the stroke biomarker field. The strengths of our research are as follows: (1) possible circRNAs were identified by a circRNA microarray in the discovery cohort and were validated in an independent cohort using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. AIS patients and HCs in these 2 cohorts were strictly matched in age and sex. (2) Absolute quantification analysis8 was used to quantify copy numbers of circRNAs per microliter of plasma in the replication cohort, the method of which is novel and accurate in biomarker research. (3) Blood cells were separated to determine possible origins of circRNAs, and the possible downstream mechanism was analyzed by bioinformatics analysis for the guidance of future research on treatment targets.
However, our study also has some limitations. First, AIS patients and controls in the replication cohort were not completely matched for demographic and vascular risk factors, whereas adjustment for covariates was conducted by linear multivariate model to eliminate influences of confounding factors. Additionally, more patients need to be involved in our research for further verification of the significance of circRNAs in predicting outcome, especially for subtype analysis according to etiological classification. Moreover, RNase R, which was used for digesting liner RNAs, was only applied in the discovery cohort to increase the analytical sensitivity of microarray. Therefore, linear RNA might have contributed to the circular RNA studied in the validation and replication cohorts.
In conclusion, we illustrated for the first time that circFUNDC1, circPDS5B, and circCDC14A expression levels increased after AIS, and their levels were positively correlated with the infarct volume. The combination of these 3 circRNAs could serve as a biomarker for diagnosing and predicting stroke outcomes.

Supplemental Material

File (str_stroke-2019-027348d_supp1.pdf)

References

1.
Stinear CM. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: advances in biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:826–836. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30283-1
2.
Tiedt S, Prestel M, Malik R, Schieferdecker N, Duering M, Kautzky V, et al. RNA-seq identifies circulating miR-125a-5p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-143-3p as potential biomarkers for acute ischemic stroke. Circ Res. 2017;121:970–980. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311572
3.
De Marchis GM, Dankowski T, König IR, Fladt J, Fluri F, Gensicke H, et al. A novel biomarker-based prognostic score in acute ischemic stroke: the CoRisk score. Neurology. 2019;92:e1517–e1525. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007177
4.
Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Chang JJ, Malhotra K, Pandhi A, Ishfaq MF, et al. Admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker of outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke. 2018;49:1985–1987. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021477
5.
Han B, Chao J, Yao H. Circular RNA and its mechanisms in disease: from the bench to the clinic. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;187:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.010
6.
Bai Y, Zhang Y, Han B, Yang L, Chen X, Huang R, et al. Circular RNA DLGAP4 ameliorates ischemic stroke outcomes by targeting miR-143 to regulate endothelial-mesenchymal transition associated with blood-brain barrier integrity. J Neurosci. 2018;38:32–50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1348-17.2017
7.
Han B, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Chen X, Huang R, et al. Novel insight into circular RNA HECTD1 in astrocyte activation via autophagy by targeting MIR142-TIPARP: implications for cerebral ischemic stroke. Autophagy. 2018;14:1164–1184. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1458173
8.
Bissels U, Wild S, Tomiuk S, Holste A, Hafner M, Tuschl T, et al. Absolute quantification of microRNAs by using a universal reference. RNA. 2009;15:2375–2384. doi: 10.1261/rna.1754109

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Received: 11 July 2019
Revision received: 8 October 2019
Accepted: 9 October 2019
Published online: 6 November 2019
Published in print: January 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. biomarker
  2. blood
  3. granulocyte
  4. lymphocytes
  5. polymerase chain reaction

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Lei Zuo, MD
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Lin Zhang, MD
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Department of Neurology, Nanjing Medical University, China (L. Zhang)
Juan Zu, MD
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Zan Wang, MD, PhD
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Bing Han, PhD
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Biling Chen, MS
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Mengjing Cheng, MS
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Minzi Ju, MS
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Mingyue Li, MS
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Guofang Shu, MD
Clinical Laboratory (G.S.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Mengqin Yuan, MS
College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangsu, China (M.Y., W.J.)
Wei Jiang, PhD
College of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangsu, China (M.Y., W.J.)
Xufeng Chen, MD
Emergency Department, Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, China (X.C.)
Fuling Yan, MD, PhD
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Zhijun Zhang, MD, PhD [email protected]
From the Department of Neurology (L. Zuo, L. Zhang, J.Z., Z.W., F.Y., Z.Z.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Honghong Yao, PhD [email protected]
Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital and Department of Pharmacology (B.H., B.C., M.C., M.J., M.L., H.Y.), School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Jiangsu, China (H.Y.).

Notes

The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at Supplemental Material.
Correspondence to Honghong Yao, PhD, Department of Pharmacology, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China, Email [email protected]
Zhijun Zhang, MD, Department of Neurology, Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China, Email [email protected]

Disclosures

None.

Sources of Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81673410, No. 81603090, No. 81830040, No.81420108012), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_0184).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. CircRNA: A new target for ischemic stroke, Gene, 933, (148941), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2024.148941
    Crossref
  2. Diagnostic efficacy of ACA, aβ2-GP1, hs-CRP, and Hcy for cerebral infarction and their relationship with the disease severity, American Journal of Translational Research, 16, 6, (2369-2378), (2024).https://doi.org/10.62347/DDWQ9504
    Crossref
  3. Neurorehabilitation and its relationship with biomarkers in motor recovery of acute ischemic stroke patients – A systematic review, Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research, 13, 2, (125-134), (2024).https://doi.org/10.4103/jcsr.jcsr_16_23
    Crossref
  4. Non-coding RNAs in acute ischemic stroke: from brain to periphery, Neural Regeneration Research, 20, 1, (116-129), (2024).https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-23-01292
    Crossref
  5. Effects of cell-free DNA on kidney disease and intervention strategies, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1377874
    Crossref
  6. The roles of circular RNAs in nerve injury and repair, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 17, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1419520
    Crossref
  7. Analysis of the expression level and predictive value of CLEC16A|miR-654-5p|RARA regulatory axis in the peripheral blood of patients with ischemic stroke based on biosignature analysis, Frontiers in Neurology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1353275
    Crossref
  8. Identification of immune-related biomarkers for intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosis based on RNA sequencing and machine learning, Frontiers in Immunology, 15, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1421942
    Crossref
  9. The Roles of Circular RNAs in Ischemic Stroke through Modulating Neuroinflammation, Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 23, 4, (2024).https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2304087
    Crossref
  10. Crosstalk Between circRNA and Tumor Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Mechanism, Function and Applications, OncoTargets and Therapy, Volume 17, (7-26), (2024).https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S437536
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Circulating Circular RNAs as Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Stroke
  • Vol. 51
  • No. 1

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Stroke
  • Vol. 51
  • No. 1
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response