Skip main navigation

SARS-CoV-2 and Stroke in a New York Healthcare System

Originally published 2020;51:2002–2011


Background and Purpose:

With the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the current worldwide pandemic, there is mounting evidence that patients affected by the illness may develop clinically significant coagulopathy with thromboembolic complications including ischemic stroke. However, there is limited data on the clinical characteristics, stroke mechanism, and outcomes of patients who have a stroke and COVID-19.


We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke who were hospitalized between March 15, 2020, and April 19, 2020, within a major health system in New York, the current global epicenter of the pandemic. We compared the clinical characteristics of stroke patients with a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 to stroke patients without COVID-19 (contemporary controls). In addition, we compared patients to a historical cohort of patients with ischemic stroke discharged from our hospital system between March 15, 2019, and April 15, 2019 (historical controls).


During the study period in 2020, out of 3556 hospitalized patients with diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, 32 patients (0.9%) had imaging proven ischemic stroke. Cryptogenic stroke was more common in patients with COVID-19 (65.6%) as compared to contemporary controls (30.4%, P=0.003) and historical controls (25.0%, P<0.001). When compared with contemporary controls, COVID-19 positive patients had higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and higher peak D-dimer levels. When compared with historical controls, COVID-19 positive patients were more likely to be younger men with elevated troponin, higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Patients with COVID-19 and stroke had significantly higher mortality than historical and contemporary controls.


We observed a low rate of imaging-confirmed ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Most strokes were cryptogenic, possibly related to an acquired hypercoagulability, and mortality was increased. Studies are needed to determine the utility of therapeutic anticoagulation for stroke and other thrombotic event prevention in patients with COVID-19.


See related article, p 1924

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the illness caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 coronavirus, has an unclear impact on the cerebrovascular system. With over 200 000 confirmed cases as of April 15, 2020, New York State currently accounts for ≈10% of all confirmed cases worldwide. Given early reports of an association between COVID-19 and cerebrovascular disease, there is a critical, unmet need to define associations and outcomes of patients with cerebrovascular disease and COVID-19.

Understanding factors associated with stroke in patients with COVID-19 will aid in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19 associated cerebrovascular disease as well as potentially identify underlying mechanisms. In this study, we aim to characterize ischemic stroke in patients with COVID-19 from a large healthcare system with a diverse patient population in the New York metropolitan area and compare these characteristics to those of contemporary and historical ischemic stroke controls without COVID-19.


Study Population

We obtained institutional review board approval from NYU Langone Health to perform the study, and informed consent was waived by the institutional review board. Data from the study are available for sharing upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. This is a retrospective observational study including patients admitted to one of 3 comprehensive stroke centers in the New York metropolitan area (NYU Langone Manhattan, NYU Langone Brooklyn in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, and NYU Langone Winthrop in Mineola, Long Island) with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized between March 15, 2020, and April 19, 2020. All consecutive patients with radiological confirmation of acute ischemic stroke during this time frame were included. In addition, we included consecutive patients from 2 of our facilities (NYU Langone Brooklyn and NYU Langone Manhattan) with a discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke between March 15, 2019, and April 15, 2019, as a historical comparator group (historical control).

Stroke Assessment and Classification

In general, patients underwent a standard diagnostic evaluation, including brain imaging, intracranial and extracranial vascular imaging, and cardiac evaluation, including ECG, in-house continuous cardiac telemetry for at least 24 hours, and transthoracic echocardiography per institutional protocol. Stroke subtype was classified based on the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification.1 Large artery atherosclerosis was defined as 50% or more narrowing in an artery supplying the ischemic infarct territory, small vessel disease was defined as a small (≤1.5 cm on head computed tomography or ≤2 cm on diffusion-weighted imaging sequence) subcortical infarct in patients with risk factors for small vessel disease, cardioembolic was defined as the presence of a major cardioembolic source, such as atrial fibrillation, endocarditis, or ejection fraction ≤30%, and other was defined as an alternative mechanism such as dissection or known hypercoagulability, excluding de novo hypercoagulability in the setting of a COVID-19. Cryptogenic was defined as cases not meeting criteria for any of the above stroke subtypes, including those with incomplete workup or with multiple competing high-risk mechanisms.1 In addition, we defined embolic stroke of undetermined source according to the criteria proposed by the Cryptogenic Stroke/Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source International Working Group.2 Finally, we also classified strokes based on the ASCOD criteria (atheroclerosis, small-vessel disease, cardiac pathology, other cause, and dissection).3

Study Variables

The following variables were abstracted from the medical records of patients:

  1. Demographic variables: age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

  2. Clinical variables: History of hypertension, history of diabetes mellitus, history of hyperlipidemia, history of coronary artery disease, history of congestive heart failure, history of atrial fibrillation, history of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack; active smoking; admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score; date of stroke determined as date of stroke symptom onset and if not available, it was based on the date the stroke likely occur based on the abstractors clinical judgment.

  3. Laboratory variables: cardiac troponin level (closest to the time of the stroke), C-reactive protein (closest to the time of the stroke), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (closest to the time of the stroke), and D-dimer level (highest level and closest to the time of the stroke).

  4. Imaging variables: infarct pattern (multiple vascular territories versus single vascular territory) and proximal large artery occlusion (defined as occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery, M1, and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery, basilar artery, or P1 segment of the posterior cerebral artery).

  5. In-hospital treatments: alteplase, mechanical thrombectomy, anticoagulation therapy, mechanical ventilation, hydroxychloroquine, and other novel investigational treatments.

  6. Discharge outcomes: discharge disposition (home, acute rehab, nursing facility, or death/hospice), and in-hospital mortality.

COVID-19 Screening and Diagnosis

Screening for COVID-19 was performed at first provider contact and included evaluation for recent COVID-19 exposure, history of fever or respiratory symptoms, or chest radiographic findings. In general, patients with a negative screen do not undergo COVID-19 testing. A positive screen would trigger testing, and this is generally the case when screening could not be completed. Assays for COVID-19 were performed in accordance with standards established by the World Health Organization. A reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction study was performed in each center’s laboratory using a sample obtained via a nasopharyngeal swab. The primary variable of interest was COVID-19 status (positive versus negative).

Statistical Analysis

No sample-size calculations were performed. All patients (cases and control groups) were divided into 3 groups: group 1 included patients with ischemic stroke and COVID-19 (cases), group 2 included contemporary patients with ischemic stroke without COVID-19 (contemporary controls), and group 3 included historical patients with ischemic stroke without COVID-19 over the same time frame (historical controls). We compared baseline characteristics and stroke subtypes between the groups, using the Fischer exact test for categorical variables and nonparametric test for continuous variables. We then performed binary logistic regression analyses to determine baseline characteristics and laboratory values associated with stroke in the setting of COVID-19 compared with historical and contemporary controls. In these models, we included variables with a 2-sided P<0.05 on univariate models. In addition, we performed binary logistic regression analyses to determine the association between COVID-19 related stroke and in-hospital mortality adjusting for age and admission NIHSS score. Analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago, IL), and a 2-sided P<0.05 was considered significant.


Characteristics of Patients With COVID-19 and Stroke

Out of 3556 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection during the study period, we identified a total of 32 patients (0.9%) who had radiologically proven ischemic stroke. Among contemporary controls, 70% (32/46) underwent the COVID-19 test and the rest screened negative and were not tested.

Of the 32 patients (Table 1), stroke was the reason for admission in 43.8%, and COVID-19 symptoms were the reason for admission in 56.2%, with index stroke occurring during the hospital stay. The number of strokes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in our health care system, all COVID-19 new hospitalizations in our health care system, and all COVID-19 new hospitalizations in New York City are shown in Figure 1. Among the 32 patients with COVID-19 and stroke, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 62.5 (52.0–69.25) years and 71.9% (23/32) were men; 70.0% (21/30) were white, 20.0% (6/30) were black, 10.0% (3/30) were Asian, 13.3% (4/30) were Hispanic; 65.6% (21/32) were of cryptogenic subtype and 34.4% (11/32) met the criteria for embolic stroke of undetermined source. The median (IQR) time from first COVID-19 symptoms to identification of stroke was 10 (5–16.5) days. The most prominent clinical features were cough (84.4%), fever (71.9%), and hypoxia (78.1%). At last follow-up, 81.3% (26/32) met the criteria for severe disease; 75.0% (24/32) were dead or critically ill. The median (IQR) D-dimer level closest to the time of the stroke was 3913 ng/mL (2549–10 000), and the median (IQR) C-reactive protein level was 101.1 mg/L (38.8–214.3). Figure 2 shows brain and chest imaging of 2 patients with COVID-19 and cryptogenic stroke subtype. Treatments before stroke symptoms/diagnosis included hydroxychloroquine (40.6%, n=13), lopinavir-ritonavir (3.1%, n=1), and tocilizumab (6.3%, n=2).

Table 1. Characteristics of COVID-19 Positive Imaging Proven Ischemic Stroke Patients

Demographics Risk FactorsCOVID-19 Symptoms and SeverityDays From COVID-19 Symptoms to Stroke and Any COVID-19 Treatment Before StrokeLaboratory Values Closest to Time of StrokeStroke Subtype*TreatmentOutcome
Patient 150s black with HTNCough6 dCRP 11CryptogenicAlteplaseDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer >10 000A2 SO C9 O1 D0Thrombectomy
Patient 260s white with HTN, DM2, HLPD, AF, CHF, and CADCough, fever, hypoxia1 dCRP 31.6Large artery atherosclerosis (basilar stenosis)Aspirin, clopidogrelDeath
D-dimer 342
IL-6 level 5A1 S3 C1 O0 D0
Patient 370s white with HTN, DM2, AF, HLPD, and prior strokeFever, cough, hypoxia5 dCRP 72CardioembolicAlteplaseDeath
D-dimer 3247A3 S0 C1 O2 D0Thrombectomy
IL-6 level 14
Patient 470s white with HTN and HLPDCough, hypoxia8 dCRP 111CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
D-dimer >10 000A9 S0 C1 O1 D9
Troponin 18.1
Patient 570s Asian with HTNFever, cough, hypoxia5 dCRP 63.8CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
D-dimer >10 000A9 S0 C9 O1 D9
Troponin 0.23
Patient 650s white with HTN, DM2, and HLPDNo symptomsNo symptoms priorNALarge artery atherosclerosis (M1 segment stenosis)AspirinDischarged home
A1 S3 C9 O0 D0Clopidogrel
Patient 740s black with HTN, DM2, and HLPDHypoxiaNo symptoms priorCRP 16.7Cardioembolic (EF 26%)ThrombectomyDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer 769A0 S0 C1 O0 D0Aspirin
Patient 840s Asian without known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxia14 dCRP 170CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer >10 000A9 S0 C0 O2 D9
Troponin 0.837
Patient 960s white with HTN and AFNo symptoms1 dCRP 6.9CardioembolicAnticoagulationHome
A0 S3 C1 O2 D0
Patient 1050s white with HTN, DM2, and HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia5 dCRP 101.1CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
D-dimer 319A9 S0 C1 O2 D9
Patient 1160s white with HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia18 dCRP 214.3CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
D-dimer 4841A9 S3 C3 O1 D9
IL-6 264
Patient 1270s white with HTN and AFCough, hypoxia10 dCRP 94.4Cardioembolic new onset AF after strokeAlteplase Thrombectomy AnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer >10 000
IL-6 870A2 S0 C1 O1 D0
Patient 1360s white with HTN and HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia15 dCRP 154.4CryptogenicAlteplase Thrombectomy AnticoagulationDeath
D-dimer 4102A3 S0 C0 O1 D0
Patient 1440s black with no past medical historyCoughNo symptoms priorCRP 141.8CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
D-dimer >10 000A1 S3 C0 O1 D0
Troponin 0.34
Patient 1540s white with DM2 and HLPDHypoxia3 dCRP 38.8CryptogenicAnticoagulationDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer >10 000A0 S0 C0 O1 D0
Patient 1670s white with HTN, HLPD, and AFFever, cough, hypoxia24 dCRP 76CardioembolicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 3723A9 S3 C1 O1 D9
TocilizumabIL-6 7
Patient 1740s white with HTN, HLPD, DM2, and CADFever, cough, hypoxiaNo symptoms priorCRP 17CardioembolicAspirinDeath
D-dimer 2004(EF=30%)
Troponin 4.5A3 S3 C1 O2 D0
Patient 1860s white with HTN, DM2, HLPD, CAD, and AFFever, coughUnknownCRP 108CardioembolicAnticoagulationDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer 226A3 S3 C1 O2 D9
IL-6 30
Patient 1970s white with HTN and HLPDFever, cough6 dCRP 60.3CryptogenicAspirinDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer 662A3 S3 C0 O2 D9
Troponin 0.2
Patient 2060s black with DM2 and HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia5 dCRP 70CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 4786A3 S3 C9 O1 D9
Troponin 0.1
Patient 2160s white with HTN, HLPD, and CADFever, cough, hypoxia27 dCRP 248CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 5870A9 S3 C3 O1 D9
Troponin 0.2
IL-6 125
Patient 2260s with no known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxia16 dCRP 323.73CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 3081A0 S0 C3 O2 D0
Patient 2340s black with HTNNo COVID-19 symptomsNo symptoms priorCRP 11.9CryptogenicThrombectomyCritically ill
D-dimer 2735A0 S0 C0 O1 D0Anticoagulation
Patient 2470s white with DM2Fever, cough, hypoxia27 dCRP 142.1CryptogenicAnticoagulationDeath
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 2814A0 S0 C3 O1 D0
Patient 2550s white without known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxia7 dCRP 9.9CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 3248A9 S0 C2 O1 D9
Patient 2660s Asian with HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia10 dCRP 297CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer >10 000A3 S3 C2 O1 D0
Patient 2760s white without known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxia17 dCRP 314.5CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 2703A0 S3 C3 O1 D0
TocilizumabTroponin 0.89
Patient 2870s white with DM2 and CADFever, cough, hypoxia3 dCRP 366.5Watershed from hypotensionAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer >10 000
Troponin 0.52A3 S3 C3 O1 D0
Patient 2940s black with HTN, HLPD, and CHFFever, cough, hypoxia15 dCRP 235Watershed from hypotensionAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 2087
Troponin 1.42A3 S3 C1 O1 D0
Patient 3050s white with no known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxia22 dCRP 210.78CryptogenicAnticoagulationDischarged to rehabilitation
D-dimer 6933A0 S0 C0 O1 D0
Troponin 0.7
Patient 3150s with no known medical historyFever, cough, hypoxiaUnknownCRP 284.91CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
D-dimer >10 000A9 S0 C0 O1 D9
Troponin 1.3
Patient 3260s white with HLPDFever, cough, hypoxia15 dCRP 83.03CryptogenicAnticoagulationCritically ill
HydroxychloroquineD-dimer 3058A9 S0 C9 O1 D9
Troponin 0.7

D-dimer is in ng/mL, troponin level is in ng/mL, and IL-6 is in pg/mL. AF indicates atrial fibrillation; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C-reactive protein measured in mg/L; DM2, type II diabetes mellitus; EF, ejection fraction; HLPD, hyperlipidemia; HTN, hypertension; IL-6, interleukin 6; and NA, not available.

*Stroke subtype performed using Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria and using ASCOD criteria (atheroclerosis, small-vessel disease, cardiac pathology, other cause, and dissection).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related hospitalizations and ischemic strokes during the study period are shown.A, COVID-19 hospitalizations (gray bars) and COVID-19 related deaths (black bars) in New York City over the study period. B, All COVID-19 admissions to New York University Langone Health (NYULH) during the study period. C, Number of in-house COVID-19 positive patients per day. D, COVID-19 hospitalizations with imaging proven ischemic stroke. Arrows indicate when the stay at home order was issued (March 22, 2020 at 8 pm).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. These images are from 2 patients with ischemic stroke in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The left shows chest imaging (CT or x-ray) and the right shows brain imaging of 2 patients with cryptogenic stroke and COVID-19 infection in our patient cohort.

Univariate Analyses

When compared with contemporary stroke controls, patients with COVID-19 and stroke were younger (median [IQR] in years: 63 [17] versus 70 [18], P=0.001), had higher admission NIHSS score (median [IQR] NIHSS score: 19 [23] versus 8 [12], P=0.007), had higher peak D-dimer level (median [IQR] in ng/mL: >10 000 [7427] versus 526 [2752], P=0.023, were more likely to be treated with anticoagulation (78.1% versus 23.9%, P<0.001), more likely to have a cryptogenic stroke subtype (65.6% versus 30.4%, P=0.003), and higher inpatient mortality (63.6% versus 9.3%, P<0.001; Table 2).

Table 2. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With COVID-19 and Stroke Versus Contemporary and Historical Ischemic Stroke Controls

COVID-19 Positive (A) (n=32)COVID-19 Negative (B)+ (n=46)Historical Controls (C) (n=80)P Value (A vs B)P Value (A vs C)P Value (B vs C)
Age, median (IQR)63 (17)70 (18)68.5 (23)0.0010.0780.881
Sex (% men)71.9% (23)52.2% (24)45.0% (36)0.1020.0120.464
Hypertension (%)56.3% (18)76.1% (35)80.0% (64)0.0860.0170.655
Diabetes mellitus (%)34.4% (11)28.3% (13)30.0% (24)0.6230.6581.000
Hyperlipidemia (%)56.3% (18)50.0% (23)42.5% (34)0.6490.2130.460
Congestive heart failure (%)6.3% (2)10.9% (5)5.0% (4)0.6941.0000.285
Coronary artery disease (%)15.6% (5)26.1% (12)20.0% (16)0.4040.7900.506
Atrial fibrillation (%)18.8% (6)21.7% (10)25.0% (20)0.7840.6220.829
History of stroke or TIA (%)3.1% (1)13.0% (6)25.0% (20)0.2300.0070.169
Active smoking (%)0% (0)4.3% (2)12.8% (10/78)0.5130.0590.207
NIHSS score, median (IQR)19 (23)8 (12)3 (12)0.0070.0010.071
D-dimer level (ng/mL) closest to stroke diagnosis, median (IQR)3913 (7451)526 (2752)NA0.023NANA
Highest D-dimer (ng/mL) level during hospitalization, median (IQR)>10,000 (7427)526 (2752)NA0.023NANA
CRP level, median (IQR), ng/mL101.1 (175.5)37.2 (130.7)NA0.208NANA
ESR level, median (IQR)79 (53)40 (86)41 (52)0.1720.0010.860
Troponin level ≥0.1 mg/dL45.2% (14/31)23.1% (9/39)8.1% (6/74)0.073<0.0010.039
Large vessel occlusion (%)45.5% (10/22)27.9% (12/43)20.3% (16/79)0.3180.0260.372
Alteplase (%)12.5% (4)10.9% (5)7.5% (6)1.0000.4680.528
Thrombectomy (%)18.8% (6)17.4% (8)13.8% (11)1.0000.5630.612
Anticoagulation (%)78.1% (25)23.9% (11)25.0% (20)<0.001<0.0011.000
Stroke subtype0.0110.0010.365
 Cardioembolic21.9% (7)21.7% (10)35.0% (28)
 Large vessel disease6.3% (2)17.4% (8)21.3% (17)
 Small vessel disease0% (0)13.0% (6)10.0% (8)
 Cryptogenic65.6% (21)30.4% (14)25.0% (20)
 Other defined mechanisms6.3% (2)17.4% (8)8.8% (7)
Cryptogenic stroke (vs other mechanism) (%)65.6% (21)30.4% (14)25.0% (20)0.003<0.0010.537
Embolic stroke of undetermined source (vs other mechanism)* (%)50.0% (11/22)25.0% (11/44)24.1% (19/79)0.0550.0331.000
In-hospital death (%)63.6% (14/22)9.3% (4/43)6.3% (5)<0.001<0.0010.718

COVID-19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019; CRP, C-reactive protein measured in mg/L; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate measure in mm/h; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not available; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.

*Patients with incomplete diagnostic evaluation were excluded, +one patient with cryptogenic stroke excluded due to upper respiratory in the week before admission but no COVID testing performed.

When compared with historical stroke controls, patients with COVID-19 and stroke were more likely to be men (71.9% versus 45.0%, P=0.012), had higher admission NIHSS score (median [IQR] NIHSS score: 19 [23] versus 3 [12], P=0.001), had higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate level (median [IQR]: 79 [53] versus 41 [52], P=0.001), were more likely to have positive troponin levels (45.2% versus 8.1%, P<0.001), were more likely to have proximal large vessel occlusion (45.5% versus 20.3%, P=0.026), were more likely to be treated with anticoagulation (78.1% versus 25.0%, P<0.001), were more likely to have a cryptogenic stroke subtype (65.6% versus 25.0%, P<0.001), and higher inpatient mortality (63.6% versus 6.3%, P<0.001; Table 2). Conversely, patients with COVID-19 and stroke were less likely to have hypertension (56.3% versus 80.0%, P=0.017) and history of prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (3.1% versus 25.0%, P=0.007).

Among patients with ischemic stroke and COVID-19, cryptogenic stroke subtype was associated with a trend towards higher d-dimer median (IQR) level in ng/mL at the time of the stroke (4841 [7064] versus 2087 [6306], P=0.109) but not with a significantly higher median (IQR) C-reactive protein level mg/L (141.8 [169.1] versus 74 [122.8], P=0.303).

Binary Logistic Regression Analyses

In binary logistic regression models (Table 3), when compared with contemporary controls, patients with COVID-19 had non-significantly higher admission NIHSS score (odds ratio [OR] per point increase 1.13 [95% CI, 0.98–1.30], P=0.085) and higher peak d-dimer level (OR per 100 ng/mL increase 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00–1.05], P=0.093). In addition, when adjusting for age and NIHSS score, patients with COVID-19 and stroke had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than contemporary controls (adjusted OR 64.87 [95% CI, 4.44–987.28], P=0.002).

Table 3. Binary Logistic Regressions Analyses Showing Clinical and Laboratory Factors Associated With COVID-19 Positivity (P<0.05) Compared With Contemporary Controls (Model 1) and Historical Controls (Model 2)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)P Value
Model 1 (n=36 patients included)
 Age per year increase0.98 (0.91–1.04)0.371
 NIHSS score per unit increase1.13 (0.98–1.30)0.085
 Highest D-dimer per 100 unit increase1.02 (1.00–1.05)0.093
Model 2* (n=53 patients included)
 Age per year increase0.89 (0.78–1.01)0.062
 Male sex13.48 (0.91–200.27)0.059
 NIHSS per unit increase1.23 (1.05–1.44)0.010
 History of hypertension0.57 (0.05–6.87)0.656
 Positive troponin17.25 (0.58–510.35)0.099
 ESR per unit increase1.03 (1.00–1.06)0.041

COVID-19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate measured in mm/h; and NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

*History of stroke or transient ischemic attack could not be included in the model due to the <2 occurrences in one of the cells.

In binary logistic regression models (Table 3), when compared with historical controls, COVID-19 positive patients were non-significantly more likely to be younger (OR per year increase 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78–1.01], P=0.062), be men (OR 13.48 [95% CI, 0.91–200.27], P=0.059), have elevated troponin levels (OR 17.25 [95% CI, 0.58–510.35], P=0.099), a significantly higher admission NIHSS score (OR per point increase 1.23 [95% CI, 1.05–1.44], P=0.010), and a significantly higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate level (OR per 1 unit increase 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00–1.06], P=0.041). In addition, when adjusting for age and NIHSS score, patients with COVID-19 and stroke had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than historical controls (adjusted OR 40.27 [95% CI, 5.44–298.01], P<0.001).


Main Findings

In this multi-ethnic study, we report key demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who develop ischemic stroke associated with acute severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 coronavirus infection. The observed rate of imaging-confirmed acute ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 of 0.9% was lower compared with prior reports from Chinese COVID-19 studies. Reasons for difference are unknown but could possibly be related to differences in the patient population studied in our patient population as compared to the other studies and other studies including hemorrhagic stroke and venous sinus thrombosis patients. In addition, the rate of ischemic stroke in our study may be an underestimate as the detection of ischemic stroke symptoms is challenging in those critically ill with COVID-19 infection who are intubated and sedated.

When classified according to the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment criteria,1 a majority (65.6%) of these patients were classified as cryptogenic stroke and 34.4% met embolic stroke of undetermined source criteria. In contrast, 30.4% of the contemporary COVID negative control group and 25.0% of the historical control group were classified as cryptogenic stroke, in keeping with other modern stroke cohorts.4 Patients with COVID-19 and stroke were very ill as a group; 68.8% of patients required mechanical ventilation and 81.3% had severe illness graded according to the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America Criteria for pneumonia severity.5 Our findings are congruent with other studies which reported an increased prevalence of neurological disorders in those with more severe infection.6

Our study also shows that the number of COVID-19 positive ischemic strokes has increased initially but seems to have peaked and then decreased. This finding may be related to the overall reduction in COVID-19 admissions, likely due to social distancing and stay at home order (Figure 1). In addition, a therapeutic anticoagulation protocol was instated in our institution the week of April sixth, 2020, which suggests the use of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with high D-dimer levels. This may have led to a lower rate to thrombotic complications including ischemic stroke in hospitalized COVID-19 positive patients.

Furthermore, the number of patients with stroke hospitalized in the study period were less than historical controls. This witnessed low volume of acute emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic has been observed in other institutions as well.7 The reasons for this are unclear but possibly that patients with stroke and mild symptoms are staying at home and not presenting to the emergency department for stroke treatment.

Mechanisms of Associations

There are multiple, not mutually exclusive, possible mechanisms associating COVID-19 with ischemic stroke. In patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive respiratory support, the median duration of mechanical ventilation has been reported 11 days,8 which renders them vulnerable to complications associated with critical illness and a prolonged intensive care unit stay including the risk for (1) hypotension and inadequate cerebral perfusion; (2) relative hypertension leading to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; (3) septic embolization in the case of superimposed bacterial infection; (4) stress cardiomyopathy and an attendant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction; and (5) atrial fibrillation with or without a rapid ventricular response.

Additionally, severe COVID-19 has been associated with a hyperinflammatory state (cytokine storm9) and hyperviscosity. Progression to disseminated intravascular coagulation is more common in COVID-19 than in other forms of critical illness; one case series reported an incidence of 8.7% with associated 94% mortality.10 Mortality is associated with higher fibrin-degradation product levels and prolonged prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin times.11 D-dimer was elevated in 36% of patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan,12 which was associated with a higher risk of mortality,13 an association suggested to be driven at least partially by increased thrombotic complications. Preliminary reports from China describe patients with COVID-19 who developed multiple, bilateral ischemic cerebral infarcts, antiphospholipid antibodies, and hematologic indices suggestive of an acquired thrombophilia.14 During the first SARS outbreak in the early 2000s, postmortem studies demonstrated a florid vasculitis in multiple arterial beds,15 and it is not known whether this disease pattern occurs with severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 coronavirus infection.

Potential Therapeutic Implications

There are 2 main implications for clinical care that arise from our data. First, many institutions are currently attempting to balance the benefits of rapid, structured neurological evaluations for patients with COVID-19 exhibiting new neurological symptoms with the risks of exposing multiple team members to infection.16 As centers develop protocols for the prompt triage and assessment of patients with COVID-19, the co-occurrence of stroke and COVID-19 should be considered when weighing these risks. Second, stroke in the setting of COVID-19 could be a manifestation of systemic hypercoagulability as shown in our patient population with higher D-dimer levels when compared with contemporary controls. Further study is required whether therapeutic anticoagulation in this setting mitigates ischemic stroke risk. In fact, PROTECT COVID (A Randomized Trial of Anticoagulation Strategies in COVID-19) is an ongoing randomized clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 infection and mild to moderate elevation in D-dimer level (URL: Unique identifier: NCT04359277).

Strengths and Limitations

Our study reports the clinical characteristics of a diverse patient population with ischemic stroke in the setting of COVID-19. We report subject level data, including key clinical variables, markers of disease severity, and diagnostic workup for ischemic stroke.

Our findings should be interpreted with caution in the context of a number of important limitations. First, our study was a relatively small, retrospective, observational study with potential for selection bias. Second, we did not have outcome data on all patients as some are still admitted receiving active clinical care. Third, we do not have complete laboratory investigations or diagnostic imaging for all study subjects, and therefore, some cryptogenic strokes may be related to another undiagnosed mechanism. This likely contributed to an increased prevalence of cryptogenic stroke subtype in patients with COVID-19 infection. Fourth, our study may not be fully representative of all patients with stroke in our healthcare system; patients who are critically ill may not be diagnosed with stroke due to impaired consciousness, confounding systemic illness, or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies. Fifth, since this report focused on ischemic stroke, we did not provide information on hemorrhagic stroke and venous sinus thrombosis occurring in patients with COVID-19. These complications in the setting of COVID-19 need further study. Finally, since not all patients were tested for COVID-19, it is possible that some asymptomatic patients with stroke may have been COVID positive but were included in the control group.


We observed a relatively low rate of imaging proven ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection. In patients with COVID-19 and ischemic stroke, a majority of strokes were classified as cryptogenic, possibly related to an acquired hypercoagulability, and were associated with increased mortality. Ongoing studies are testing the utility of therapeutic anticoagulation for stroke and other thrombotic event prevention, in select patients with COVID-19 and laboratory evidence suggestive of hypercoagulability.


Dr Yaghi, B. Mac Grory, Dr Henninger, and Dr Frontera participated in study design and drafting the article. Dr Humbert, Dr Ishida, Dr Alam, Dr Lord, Dr Sanger, Dr Lillemoe, E. Scher, Dr Kim, Dr Raz, and Dr Tanweer participated in data abstraction and article revision. Dr Trivedi performed the statistical analysis.


For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 2010–2011.

Correspondence to: Shadi Yaghi, MD, Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, 150 55th St, Brooklyn, NY 11220. Email


  • 1. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EEClassification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.Stroke. 1993; 24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2. Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, Sacco RL, Connolly S.; Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct.Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13:429–438. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Sirimarco G, Lavallée PC, Labreuche J, Meseguer E, Cabrejo L, Guidoux C, Klein IF, Olivot JM, Abboud H, Adraï V, et al. Overlap of diseases underlying ischemic stroke: the ASCOD phenotyping.Stroke. 2013; 44:2427–2433. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Ornello R, Degan D, Tiseo C, Di Carmine C, Perciballi L, Pistoia F, Carolei A, Sacco S. Distribution and temporaltrendsfrom 1993 to 2015 of ischemicstrokesubtypes: asystematicreview and meta-analysis.Stroke. 2018; 49:814–819. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020031LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM, Musher DM, Niederman MS, et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious diseases society of America/American thoracic society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44(suppl 2):S27–S72. doi: 10.1086/511159CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, Chang J, Hong C, Zhou Y, Wang D, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China [published online April 10, 2020].JAMA Neurol. 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127Google Scholar
  • 7. Garcia S, Albaghdadi MS, Meraj PM, Schmidt C, Garberich R, Jaffer FA, Dixon S, Rade JJ, Tannenbaum M, Chambers J, et al. Reduction in ST-segment elevation cardiac catheterization laboratory activations in the United States during COVID-19 pandemic [published online April 7, 2020].J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.011Google Scholar
  • 8. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, Greninger AL, Pipavath S, Wurfel MM, Evans L, et al. Covid-19 in critically ill patients in the seattle region - case series [published online March 30, 2020].N Engl J Med. 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, Cao Y, Huang D, Wang H, Wang T, Zhang X, Chen H, Yu H, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019.J Clin Invest. 2020: 130(5):2620–2629.Google Scholar
  • 10. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia.J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18:844–847. doi: 10.1111/jth.14768CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, Huang H, Zhang L, Zhou X, Du C, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China [published online March 13, 2020].JAMA Intern Med. 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Lippi G, Plebani M. Procalcitonin in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis.Clin Chim Acta. 2020; 505:190–191. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.004Google Scholar
  • 13. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet. 2020; 395:1054–1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, Xia P, Cao W, Jiang W, Chen H, Ding X, Zhao H, Zhang H, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with COVID-19.N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(17):e38.Google Scholar
  • 15. Ding Y, Wang H, Shen H, Li Z, Geng J, Han H, Cai J, Li X, Kang W, Weng D, et al. The clinical pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a report from China.J Pathol. 2003; 200:282–289. doi: 10.1002/path.1440CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Majersik JJ, Reddy VK. Acute neurology during the COVID-19 pandemic: supporting the front line [published online April 13, 2020].Neurology. 2020. Accessed April 15, 2020. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009564Google Scholar


eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.