Skip to main content

Abstract

Stroke burden is substantially increasing but current therapeutic drugs are still far from ideal. Here we highlight the vast potential of staphylokinase as an efficient, fibrin-selective, inexpensive, and evolvable thrombolytic agent. The emphasis is escalated by new recent findings. Staphylokinase nonimmunogenic variant was proven noninferior to alteplase in a clinical trial, with decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and the advantage of single bolus administration. Furthermore, our detailed kinetic analysis revealed a new staphylokinase limiting bottleneck whose elimination might provide up to 1000-fold higher activity than the clinically approved alteplase. This knowledge of limitations unlocks new possibilities for improvements that are now achievable by the community of protein engineers who have the required expertise and are ready to transform staphylokinase into a powerful molecule. Collectively, the noninferiority and safety of nonimmunogenic staphylokinase together with the newly identified effectivity limitation make staphylokinase a perfect candidate for further exploration, modification, and advancement to make it the next-generation widely accessible thrombolytic drug effectively treating stroke all around the world, including middle- and low-income countries.
With 6.5 million deaths every year, stroke remains the second-leading cause of death and the third-leading cause of death and disability worldwide.1,2 The only thrombolytic therapy currently approved globally utilizes a recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, known as alteplase. Despite higher fibrin selectivity than its predecessors streptokinase and urokinase, alteplase exhibits a lower than 50% recanalization rate, neurological side effects, and an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.3,4 Alteplase-induced hemorrhage rates were reported to be ≈3% to 6% higher compared with control groups and the risk of fatal hemorrhage within 7 days increased by >2%.5,6
There have been numerous efforts to improve the properties of alteplase by various modification strategies.7 However, it has been 35 years since alteplase initial approval and none of the clinical trials has ever led to a breakthrough in stroke treatment with markedly improved thrombolysis efficiency, including clinical trials with a genetically modified alteplase, named tenecteplase.8 Tenecteplase exhibits increased half-life, improved fibrin selectivity, and higher inhibition resistance compared with alteplase, and it can be administered as a single bolus. However, tenecteplase still suffers from imperfect properties such as insufficient thrombolytic efficiency, low recanalization rate, and retained risk of intracranial hemorrhage.9
An alternative highly fibrin-specific thrombolytic agent staphylokinase was first described in 1948 and produced in 1983.7,10 Its bacterial origin, structure simplicity, and small size make its production easier and significantly less expensive than that of alteplase (Figure). As pointed out in Stroke, >80% of stroke cases arise in low- and middle-income countries. Mortality rates and disability-adjusted life-years lost are >3-fold higher in low-income countries, positioning cost-effectiveness among crucial drug characteristics.14,15 This is further supported by the fact that the price of alteplase has doubled over the last decade.16 Despite promising results of both animal testing17 and an initial randomized coronary patency trial,18 which showed comparable efficiencies of alteplase and staphylokinase, further trials were discontinued owing to the discovery that staphylokinase was highly immunogenic.
Figure. Comparison of key structural and functional features of alteplase/tenecteplase and staphylokinase. Staphylokinase (green) has a significantly smaller and simpler structure, lower production costs, higher fibrin selectivity, and no inhibition compared with alteplase (blue). Furthermore, the catalytic activity of staphylokinase is 1000-fold higher than that of alteplase.11 A nonimmunogenic variant of staphylokinase with retained thrombolytic efficiency is available, addressing its main drawback (green hatched).12,13 Tenecteplase, a variant of alteplase improved by protein engineering, exhibits increased fibrin selectivity and inhibition resistance (blue hatched).8,9
The reluctance to use staphylokinase might change with the latest clinical trial by Gusev and coworkers, who tested a nonimmunogenic staphylokinase variant.13 This variant was previously developed by Collen and coworkers and was proven to induce >200-fold lower titers of antibodies in patients while preserving its thrombolytic efficiency and high fibrin specificity (Figure).12 The recent results of the clinical trial concluded that the nonimmunogenic staphylokinase variant was noninferior to alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Intracranial hemorrhage developed in only 3% of nonimmunogenic staphylokinase-treated patients compared with 8% of patients treated with alteplase (P=0.087). Within 90 days, 4% more people died in the alteplase group (14% versus 10%; P=0.32).13 The outcome of the trial further showed several advantages of staphylokinase over alteplase, including cost-effectiveness and bolus administration, making it suitable for use in ever increasing attention mobile stroke units recently emphasized in Stroke.19 Although some concerns about the design of this clinical trial have been raised,20 the main outcome and prospective thrombolytic effectiveness and safety of nonimmunogenic staphylokinase remained relevant.
The enormous potential of staphylokinase has been further spotlighted by our recent advanced kinetic analysis.11 We showed that the net value of its thrombolytic activity is 10 000-fold higher than originally determined by conventional analysis with approximations. This is due to the identification of new limiting preceding steps, overall making staphylokinase display lower thrombolytic efficiency. Such a finding is a game-changer in the field of thrombolytic drug development: removing the uncovered main bottleneck by well-established methods of protein engineering21 is plausible and might provide a staphylokinase variant that is up to 1000-fold more effective than alteplase (Figure). Moreover, its distinct mode of action might allow for its effective application in a combination thrombolytic therapy that was proven to exhibit a synergistic effect.22 These crucial mechanistic observations pave the way for the development of next-generation thrombolytic drugs and change the paradigm by positioning staphylokinase at the forefront of other thrombolytic proteins.
In summary, favorable efficiency and safety outcomes of the clinical trial of nonimmunogenic staphylokinase13 combined with unprecedented biological activity uncovered by advanced enzyme kinetics11 make this thrombolytic protein an excellent target for improvement endeavors. The small staphylokinase protein devoid of complicated structural features is perfectly suited for further enhancement using molecular modifications. The community of protein engineers has the necessary know-how, computational tools, and laboratory technologies21 to tailor staphylokinase properties and make it a highly efficient, safe, and widely accessible thrombolytic drug.

Acknowledgments

M. Toul contributed to writing the original draft, review, editing, visualization, and project administration. J. Mican, V. Slonkova, D. Nikitin, M. Marek, and D. Bednar contributed to review and editing. J. Damborsky and Z. Prokop contributed to writing the original draft, review, editing, and resources. All authors approved the final version of the article to be published.

References

1.
Wafa HA, Wolfe CDA, Emmett E, Roth GA, Johnson CO, Wang Y. Burden of stroke in Europe: thirty-year projections of incidence, prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years. Stroke. 2020;51:2418–2427. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606
2.
Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, Abbasifard M, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abedi V, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
3.
Campbell BC, Meretoja A, Donnan GA, Davis SM. Twenty-year history of the evolution of stroke thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase to reduce long-term disability. Stroke. 2015;46:2341–2346. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007564
4.
Nikitin D, Choi S, Mican J, Toul M, Ryu WS, Damborsky J, Mikulik R, Kim DE. Development and testing of thrombolytics in stroke. J Stroke. 2021;23:12–36. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.03349
5.
Miller DJ, Simpson JR, Silver B. Safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a review of complications, risk factors, and newer technologies. Neurohospitalist. 2011;1:138–147. doi: 10.1177/1941875211408731
6.
Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Brott T, Cohen G, Davis S, Donnan G, et al; Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384:1929–1935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5
7.
Mican J, Toul M, Bednar D, Damborsky J. Structural biology and protein engineering of thrombolytics. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2019;17:917–938. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.06.023
8.
Warach SJ, Dula AN, Milling TJ. Tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2020;51:3440–3451. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029749
9.
Potla N, Ganti L. Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Int J Emerg Med. 2022;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00399-w
10.
Collen D, Lijnen HR. Staphylokinase, a fibrin-specific plasminogen activator with therapeutic potential? Blood. 1994;84:680–686 doi: 10.1182/blood.V84.3.680.680.
11.
Toul M, Nikitin D, Marek M, Damborsky J, Prokop Z. Extended mechanism of the plasminogen activator staphylokinase revealed by global kinetic analysis: 1000-fold higher catalytic activity than that of clinically used alteplase. ACS Catal. 2022;12:3807–3814 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05042.
12.
Collen D, Stockx L, Lacroix H, Suy R, Vanderschueren S. Recombinant staphylokinase variants with altered immunoreactivity. IV: identification of variants with reduced antibody induction but intact potency. Circulation. 1997;95:463–472. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.2.463
13.
Gusev EI, Martynov MY, Nikonov AA, Shamalov NA, Semenov MP, Gerasimets EA, Yarovaya EB, Semenov AM, Archakov AI, Markin SS; FRIDA Study Group. Non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase versus alteplase for patients with acute ischaemic stroke 4·5 h after symptom onset in Russia (FRIDA): a randomised, open label, multicentre, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:721–728. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00210-6
14.
Addo J, Ayerbe L, Mohan KM, Crichton S, Sheldenkar A, Chen R, Wolfe CD, McKevitt C. Socioeconomic status and stroke: an updated review. Stroke. 2012;43:1186–1191. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639732
15.
Prvu Bettger J, Liu C, Gandhi DBC, Sylaja PN, Jayaram N, Pandian JD. Emerging areas of stroke rehabilitation research in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Stroke. 2019;50:3307–3313. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.023565
16.
Kleindorfer D, Broderick J, Demaerschalk B, Saver J. Cost of alteplase has more than doubled over the past decade. Stroke. 2017;48:2000–2002. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015822
17.
Vanderschueren S, Van Vlaenderen I, Collen D. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant staphylokinase versus tissue-type plasminogen activator in a rabbit embolic stroke model. Stroke. 1997;28:1783–1788. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.9.1783
18.
Vanderschueren S, Dens J, Kerdsinchai P, Desmet W, Vrolix M, De Man F, Van den Heuvel P, Hermans L, Collen D, Van de Werf F. Randomized coronary patency trial of double-bolus recombinant staphylokinase versus front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1997;134(2 Pt 1):213–219. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70127-3
19.
Navi BB, Audebert HJ, Alexandrov AW, Cadilhac DA, Grotta JC; PRESTO (Prehospital Stroke Treatment Organization) Writing Group. Mobile stroke units: evidence, gaps, and next steps. Stroke. 2022;53:2103–2113. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037376
20.
Rothwell PM, Buchan AM. A new thrombolytic drug for acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:687–689. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00256-8
21.
Vasina M, Velecký J, Planas-Iglesias J, Marques SM, Skarupova J, Damborsky J, Bednar D, Mazurenko S, Prokop Z. Tools for computational design and high-throughput screening of therapeutic enzymes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;183:114143. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114143
22.
Gurewich V. Therapeutic fibrinolysis: how efficacy and safety can be improved. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:2099–2106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.780

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Stroke
Stroke
Pages: 3235 - 3237
PubMed: 36039755

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Published online: 30 August 2022
Published in print: October 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. alteplase
  2. immunogenicity
  3. kinetics
  4. staphylokinase
  5. stroke
  6. thrombolysis

Subjects

Authors

Affiliations

Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).
International Clinical Research Center of St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (M.T., J.M., V.S., D.N., M.M., D.B., J.D., Z.P.).

Notes

The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 3237.
Correspondence to: Zbynek Prokop, Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/C13, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic, Email [email protected]
Jiri Damborsky, Loschmidt Laboratories, Department of Experimental Biology and RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5/C13, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic, Email [email protected]

Disclosures

Disclosures None.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the Czech Ministry of Education (INBIO – CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008451; ENOCH – CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868; EXCELES Neuro – LX22NPO5107) and Grant Agency of Czech Republic (20-15915Y).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. Dispensability of a positively charged residue at Lys11 in staphylokinase for plasminogen activation, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 308, (142305), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142305
    Crossref
  2. Successful thrombolysis in an elderly patient with a large-scale hemispheric brain infarction, Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal), 102, 8, (661-664), (2025).https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2024-102-8-661-664
    Crossref
  3. Split intein-mediated backbone cyclization enhances the stability and activity of staphylokinase, a potent fibrin-selective plasminogen activator, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 275, (133448), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133448
    Crossref
  4. Comparison of the effectiveness of non-immunogenic staphylokinase and alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: analysis of hospital registry data, S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 124, 7, (139), (2024).https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2024124071139
    Crossref
  5. Fibrinolytic Agents in Thromboembolic Diseases: Historical Perspectives and Approved Indications, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 50, 05, (773-789), (2024).https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1781451
    Crossref
  6. Modern strategies for the management of patients who have suffered ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 123, 12, (61), (2023).https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202312312261
    Crossref
  7. Ursolic Acid Ameliorated Neuronal Damage by Restoring Microglia-Activated MMP/TIMP Imbalance in vitro, Drug Design, Development and Therapy, Volume 17, (2481-2493), (2023).https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S411408
    Crossref
  8. C-terminal lysine residues enhance plasminogen activation by inducing conformational flexibility and stabilization of activator complex of staphylokinase with plasmin, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 743, (109671), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2023.109671
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Hidden Potential of Highly Efficient and Widely Accessible Thrombolytic Staphylokinase
Stroke
  • Vol. 53
  • No. 10

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Stroke
  • Vol. 53
  • No. 10
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response