Abstract 11485: New Metrics of Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation Duration After Congenital Heart Surgery Reveal Variation Across Hospitals
Abstract
Background: Pediatric cardiac surgical programs aim to limit duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (POMV) to reduce complications and hospital stay. Measuring casemix-adjusted duration of POMV across hospitals might elucidate differential performance and identify improvement opportunities.
Methods: All surgical hospitalizations in the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) clinical registry from 10/2013-8/2015 were used to create a model predicting casemix-adjusted total duration of POMV using zero-inflated negative binomial regression and validated with 1000 bootstrap samples. From the model we developed metrics based on observed-to-expected POMV: early extubation success/failure, POMV reduction, and total hours of POMV saved/lost (Table 1). We ranked hospitals on each metric (1-15, 1=best) and calculated an average ranking across metrics to identify high and low performing hospitals.
Results: The cohort included 4739 hospitalizations from 15 hospitals: 53% were infants and 22% had high complexity surgery. The final model included age, weight-for-age z-score, prematurity, pre-operative MV, extracardiac anomalies, procedure complexity, and bypass time. The model was well-calibrated to predict mean duration of POMV for groups of patients. Table 1 displays the range and median of hospital rates on each of the four metrics, demonstrating variation across the group. The average ranks across these POMV duration metrics suggested two positive outlying hospitals (average rank across all 4 metrics = 1.75) and five hospitals with consistently lower performance (average 8.75-11.25).
Conclusions: We developed novel casemix-adjusted metrics of hospital performance to limit duration of POMV following pediatric cardiac surgery, and identified wide variation in relative performance across centers. These metrics may suggest opportunities for improvement when evaluated in context with other perioperative quality measures.

Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 by American Heart Association, Inc.
History
Published in print: 11 November 2016
Published online: 29 March 2018
Keywords
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- Cardiac Database and Risk Factor Assessment, Outcomes Analysis for Congenital Heart Disease, Critical Care of Children with Heart Disease, (133-141), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21870-6_12
- Critical Care Databases and Quality Collaboratives, Critical Heart Disease in Infants and Children, (58-63.e1), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-0760-7.00007-3
Loading...
View Options
View options
PDF and All Supplements
Download PDF and All SupplementsLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.