Skip main navigation
Resuscitation Science Symposium 2021
Session Title: EMS/Transport

Abstract 12233: Comparing EMS Witnessed Cardiac Arrest in Germany and Norway

Originally published 2021;144:A12233

    Introduction: Health registries are a unique source of information about current practice and can describe the burden of disease in a population. However, comparing data from different countries/states we are not always sure if we are comparing patients from similar populations.

    Method: The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the information in the German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) and the Norwegian Cardiac Arrest Registry (NorCAR) through a cross-sectional comparative-study of these two population-based public registries. We included all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients witnessed by ambulance personnel, between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2019. Proportions were assessed with Chi-square tests.

    Results: A total of 3,688 cases from Germany and 2,016 cases from Norway were included in the analysis, resulting in an incidence of 8.6 ambulance witnessed cardiac arrests per 100,000 inhabitants in Germany and 7.8 in Norway. A higher proportion of patients had resuscitation terminated on scene in Norway, 43% vs 30% (p<0.01), while the proportion of patients arriving to hospital with spontaneous circulation was higher in Germany, 49% vs 40% (p<0.01). However, 24-hour survival and the overall survival was higher in Norway, with 24-hour survival of 36% vs 31% (p<0.01), and the overall survival of 28% vs 19% (p<0.01).

    Conclusion: The incidence of cardiac arrests observed by ambulance personnel was higher in Germany, but survival was higher in Norway. We speculate that the major difference between countries is in the post-resuscitation care after admission to hospital.


    Author Disclosures: For author disclosure information, please visit the AHA Scientific Sessions 2021 Online Program Planner and search for the abstract title.


    eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

    Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.