Skip to main content
Other
Originally Published 13 December 2001
Free Access

Frequency Analysis of Ventricular Fibrillation in Swine Ventricles

Abstract

It has been suggested from frequency analysis that cardiac fibrillation is driven by stable intramural reentry, with wavebreak occurring due to failure of 1:1 propagation. We tested this hypothesis with a combined experimental and theoretical approach. Optical mapping was performed on epicardial, endocardial, and transmural cut surfaces of fibrillating swine ventricles. Wavelets were characterized, the frequency content of optical signals analyzed, and space-time plots (STPs) constructed to detect Wenckebach-like conduction. The findings were compared with simulations in 2D and 3D cardiac tissue using the Luo-Rudy action potential model. The incidence of reentry in the cut transmural surface (11.8% in right ventricle, 14.3% in left ventricle) was similar to that on the endocardial surface (13.1%, P=NS) but greater than on the epicardial surface (7.7%, P<0.01). Frequency spectra of optically recorded membrane voltage were organized into spatial domains with the same dominant frequency, but these domains were nonstationary. In STPs, pseudo-2:1 conduction block was caused by double potentials arising when reentry occurred on the recording site rather than true Wenckebach conduction. The latter was observed in 11 of 166 STPs but did not occur at borders of high-to-low frequency domains. In simulations, similar findings were obtained when action potential duration (APD) restitution slope was steep. Stationary dominant frequency domains with Wenckebach conduction patterns were observed only in the presence of shallow APD restitution slope and marked nonuniform tissue heterogeneity. In conclusion, stable intramural reentry as the engine of fibrillation was not observed. Our findings support the idea that dynamic wavebreak plays a fundamental role in the generation and maintenance of ventricular fibrillation.
The mechanisms underlying ventricular fibrillation (VF) remain incompletely understood. The original hypothesis of Moe et al1 described multiple, disorganized wavelets. Dispersion of refractoriness was shown to lead to reentry and increase the vulnerability to VF, leading to the concept that tissue heterogeneity was the cause of VF. Later, functional reentry2 was demonstrated in the form of spiral waves during VF.3 Furthermore, it was shown in simulations that even in homogeneous tissue, spiral waves could break up, mimicking real VF in which reentry is typically transient4,5 and relatively rare.6 These theoretical predictions suggested that dynamically induced heterogeneity, in addition to preexisting heterogeneity, may play an important role in causing the wavebreaks that initiate and maintain VF. The most important determinant of the purely dynamically induced component of heterogeneity has been identified in theoretical7,8 and experimental9,10 studies as electrical restitution, ie, the variation of action potential duration (APD) and conduction velocity (CV) with the diastolic interval.
Recently, Chen et al11 and Zaitsev et al12 used fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of membrane voltage signals during VF and presented evidence that a stable, high-frequency, intramural rotor, rather than wavebreak, is the engine of VF. In this focal source mother rotor paradigm, wavebreak is primarily a result of fibrillatory conduction, ie, Wenckebach-like conduction in regions that cannot follow the mother rotor with 1:1 conduction.
Conclusive proof of the mother rotor hypothesis is still lacking. A recent mapping study of transmural cut surfaces during VF failed to show stable intramural reentry,13 and frequency analysis failed to detect single stable dominant frequencies (DFs) in the FFT spectra of optical signals, instead finding multiple peaks and complex frequency spectra.14
We addressed these issues using a combined experimental and theoretical approach. Optical mapping of the endocardial, epicardial, and cut transmural ventricular surfaces was performed during VF. We characterized activation wavelets, analyzed the frequency content of optical signals to determine the spatial and temporal stability of the regional DFs, and constructed space-time plots (STPs) to detect Wenckebach-like conduction. Experimental studies were complemented by simulations in 2D and 3D cardiac tissue using the Luo-Rudy I action potential model.15

Materials and Methods

Right Ventricle (RV) Preparation

The experimental model has been previously described.16 The hearts of 15 farm pigs of either sex (purchased from S&S Farms, Ranchita, Calif) were removed via thoracotomy, the RV wall was excised and placed in a tissue bath, and the right coronary artery was perfused. In 12 tissues, the endocardium faced upward, an oblique cut was then performed at the distal edge, exposing the transmural surface13 and including the papillary muscle (PM). Optical mapping during VF was performed in the cut transmural surface as well as the adjacent endocardial surface. For comparison of transmural versus epicardial or endocardial reentry, 3 RVs were mapped in the epicardium and 3 in the endocardium. The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and followed guidelines of the American Heart Association.

Left Ventricle (LV) Preparation

Our LV wedge preparation has been previously described.13,17 In 9 tissues, a rim of tissue surrounding the left circumflex and the second obtuse marginal artery was excised, leaving an inverted L-shaped preparation that always contained at least part of the posteromedial PM. The tissue was placed in the bath with the transmural cut surface facing upward. In 3 tissues, the left circumflex artery was ligated proximally and a wedge of tissue surrounding the left anterior descending artery was cut, exposing the transmural surface of the interventricular septum.

Optical Mapping

Tissues were stained for 20 minutes with 1 to 2 μmol/L di-4-ANEPPS and were illuminated with either quasimonochromatic (500±30 nm) or laser (532 nm) light. The fluorescence was collected with a CCD camera, at either 279 or 435 frames per second, for either 4.3 or 2.3 seconds (1200 and 1000 frames, respectively). To test the short-term time dependency of frequency domains, several 5000-frame (11.5 seconds) recordings were performed in 3 tissues.

Transmembrane Potential Recording

One-minute recordings of single-cell transmembrane potentials (TMPs) were performed in 6 RV endocardial tissues, using a standard glass microelectrode, digitized at an acquisition rate of 5000 Hz.

Data Analysis

Optical signals were processed to reduce noise as described previously.13 Wavelets were identified using our previously described depolarization and repolarization detection algorithm.13 Points where depolarization and repolarization met were defined as wavebreak points. Reentry was defined as wavefront rotation around a wavebreak point completing a 360° cycle (although a stationary center of rotation was not required). The fraction of reentrant wavelets was determined as the ratio of the number of wavelets participating in a reentrant circuit over the total number of wavelets in the mapping field. Isochronal maps were generated based on the location of wavefronts in each frame, coded to different colors over time.
FFT, STPs, and pseudo-ECGs were derived from optical recordings as described elsewhere.3 STP sampling lines were generated both vertically and horizontally, dividing the maps into two halves (see Figure 1). Wenckebach-like conduction was defined to occur when the number of activations across one domain exceeded the number across the neighboring domain with a consistent ratio or with apparent decremental conduction.
Figure 1. Spatiotemporal instability of frequency domain distributions during VF. Data from 9.3 seconds (4000 frames) of continuous VF in epicardial RV are shown. A, panels a through f, DF maps in successive 2.3- (a, b, d, and e) and 4.6-second (c and f) intervals. No consistent stable pattern is present. Red vertical line is the line sampled for STPs. Adjacent to each panel are FFT spectra of pixels at circled positions labeled 1, 2, and 3. B, STPs during 4.6 seconds of the acquisition. Occasional alternating bands are seen consistent with the presence of unstable reentry. No Wenckebach patterns are present. C, Optical action potentials (in arbitrary fluorescence units [F]) at sites 1 through 3, and the pseudo-ECG during the first 4.6 seconds of the recording, showing VF. FFT spectra obtained from the full 9.2 seconds of data are shown at the far right.
Data are presented as mean±SD. χ2 test was used to compare proportions of reentrant wavelets. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used to compare wavelet descriptors.

Computer Simulations

We simulated cardiac arrhythmias using the following partial differential equation8,18:
where V is the transmembrane potential and Cm the membrane capacitance. Iion is the total ionic current density of the membrane, which was generated from phase I of the Luo and Rudy (LR1) action potential model.15
is the diffusion tensor, where ς∼ is the conductivity tensor and Sv the surface-to-volume ratio of the cell.
In the 3D simulation, the only heterogeneity was the fiber rotation. Details of incorporating fiber rotation into Equation 1 are described in our previous study.18
In the 2D simulation, we assumed that diffusion in Equation 1 was isotropic. However, we incorporated electrophysiological heterogeneities into the tissue as previously described.19 Methods for detection of reentry, FFT analysis, and pseudo-ECG generation were the same as in the experiments.
An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org.

Results

Wavelet Characteristics During VF

The Table summarizes the number of wavelets per mapped area, the mean wavelet lifetime, the incidence of complete reentry, and the mean number of reentry cycles per reentry episode. The combined (RV and LV) incidence of full-loop reentry was 11.9% (of all activation pathways), with a mean number of reentry cycles of 6.5±5.7 per reentry episode. The shortest stable rotor from 83 epochs of VF in 12 LV and 15 RV preparations lasted 69 ms (1 cycle) and the longest lasted 3423 ms (54 cycles). The incidence of transmural reentry in both LV and RV was similar to that of the endocardium but higher than that of the epicardium.
Table 1. Characteristics of Reentry During VF in Biological Tissue and Simulated 3D Tissue (5×5×2.2 cm)
 Wavelets*Nonreentrant Wavelet Lifespan, ms*Reentry EpisodesMedian Cycles per Reentry (Range)Reentry Cycle Length,* msReentry Frequency,* HzReentrant Wavelet Incidence
*P=NS;
P<0.01, but no significant differences if RV epicardium is excluded.
Transmural RV (n=12, 35 epochs)2.2±2.324±212073 (1–47)81.3±14.812.7±2.3207/1752 (11.8%)
Transmural LV (n=12, 30 epochs)2.4±2.523±192183 (1–54)82.7±22.612.2±1.6218/1532 (14.3%)
RV epicardium (n=3, 9 epochs)2.5±2.120±26932 (1–13)83.1±13.612.2±1.793/1203 (7.7%)
RV endocardium (n=3, 9 epochs)2.9±2.823±221823 (1–27)80.8±14.412.4±2.1182/1392 (13.1%)
Simulated epi-/endocardium surfaces4.954±47241.5 (1–3)96±3510.4±2.824/200 (12.0%)
Simulated transmural surface4.740±2481.3 (1–3)66±2015.2±58/200 (4.0%)

Characteristics of DF Domains

DFs, defined as the largest peak in the FFT spectra of the optical voltage signal at each pixel, were detected in all VF episodes and were spatially localized in well-circumscribed domains.12 However, these DF domains were not stationary over time, and, except at gross anatomical structures (see below), shifted their location continuously. This instability was present not only in different VF acquisitions but also within segments of a prolonged VF recording. Figure 1 shows a typical example of a 9.2-second (4000 frames) epoch of VF recorded from RV epicardium. Figure 1A shows 5 to 10 spatially discrete domains with DFs ranging from 11.9 to 14.0 Hz, which did not remain stationary over time. In fact, the spatial patterns of DF domains, when analyzed in consecutive segments, not only differed from each other, but also differed from the pattern obtained when the corresponding segments were analyzed as a whole (Figure 1A, compare panels a and b versus panel c, and panels d and e versus panel f). Subtraction maps, cross-correlation, and statistical analysis of the frequency distributions confirmed the differences between consecutive DF maps (see the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org). Figure 2A shows another example.
Figure 2. Spatiotemporal instability of local DFs. A, 11.5-second recording of VF showing STPs, optical action potentials, and DF maps obtained at 2.3-second intervals. Horizontal red line is the STP sampling line. Yellow star denotes pixel of which action potential is shown. Black dotted line marks an endocardial trabecula, visible in the raw optical picture (rightmost panel). B, FFT of the optical action potential recording in panel A, divided into five 2.3-second intervals (left). Five different DFs are present. Time course of DF in 5 tissues, showing its temporal instability (right). C, Sample of a 1-minute TMP recording (12 seconds shown), with its FFT (rightmost end), along with the DF time course determined at 1- and 10-second intervals (bottom left). DF time course from TMPs in 5 additional tissues is shown at bottom right.
Only at locations corresponding to gross anatomical structures such as PM insertions and endocardial trabeculae in the RV were boundaries between DF domains relatively stable. However, the DF values on either side of the boundary often changed, and the direction of DF gradients across such boundaries was variable. Figures 2A and 3A show examples: despite generally shifting DF domain boundaries, there was one location (black dotted line in Figure 2A, red arrows in Figure 3A) that consistently showed a domain boundary, regardless of the frequencies it separated. Moreover, the high-DF region could be either above or below the boundary. Of all VF acquisitions, 73% exhibited one boundary in a stable location (defined as present in at least 4 of 5 frequency maps). The mechanism of boundary formation at this location was due to the increased incidence of reentry at these locations, leading to double potentials (a characteristic of the core of reentry)2,20 generating shifts in DFs (see next section).
Figure 3. Reentry as a cause of frequency domain boundaries. A, Stationary boundary between frequency domains in separate acquisitions is indicated by the red arrow in panels a through f. B, Corresponding isochronal maps during the episode in Aa show reentry intermittently anchored at the site of the red arrow. Black arrows indicate wavelet direction. C, STPs corresponding to DF map and isochronal maps in Aa and B, respectively. The STP sampling line was at the horizontal bar in B and showed a branching pattern produced by double potentials arising from the drifting core of a spiral wave (see Figure 4). Red lines are the corresponding time segments of the isochronal maps in Ba-l. See text for details.
Figure 4. Optical action potentials at the stationary frequency domain boundary in Figure 2A. A, DF map during a 2.3-second acquisition of VF. A small domain of 11.0 Hz lays between larger domains of 10.2 and 9.8 Hz. B, STPs sampled from the red line in panel A (with position now displayed vertically and time horizontally). C, Optical action potentials (in fluorescence units [F]) from sites labeled 1 through 7 in panel B, along with their corresponding FFT (0 to 2 seconds) and pseudo-ECG. Sites 3 through 5 in the 11.0-Hz domain show clear double potentials and higher DF in the FFT compared with surrounding sites with lower DFs.

Local DF Instability

Local DF instability underlay frequency domain instability. Figures 1A and 2B illustrate this finding. Figure 1A shows representative FFT spectra from three pixels (labeled 1, 2, and 3) obtained from different segments of the acquisition. In Figure 1A, at the pixel labeled 1, the FFT spectrum had a DF of 11.9 Hz during the first 4.6 seconds of VF (Figure 1Ac) that shifted to 13.0 Hz during the next 4.6 seconds (Figure 1Af). This pixel had shown other DFs during other segments of the VF episode (13.2 Hz in Figures 1Aa and Figure 1Ad, 12.3 Hz in Figure 1Ab, and 12.7 Hz in Figure 1Ad). However, when all 9.2 seconds were analyzed together, the resulting DF was 13.3 Hz (Figure 1C). Figure 2B, left, shows, in a different tissue, FFT spectra of a single pixel calculated at 2.3-second intervals throughout 11.5 seconds of VF. Five different DFs are present. DF was unstable consistently in all tissues. Figure 2B, right, shows the DF time course of single pixels for 5 different tissues. To show that the changing DF was not due to filtering of the optical signal, we also analyzed the FFT of prolonged single-cell TMP recordings, which revealed a similar second-to-second variability in DF (Figure 2C).

The DF as a Single Peak: Impact of FFT Resolution

Although a largest peak (DF) could always be identified, the FFT spectra were multipeaked and exhibited significant broadband power. This was especially true when long intervals were analyzed, as illustrated by the comparison of FFT spectra of 2.3-second intervals (0.4-Hz resolution, Figure 1A, panels a, b, d, and e) with those of 4.6-second intervals (0.2-Hz resolution, Figure 1A, panels c and f), 9.2-second intervals (0.1-Hz resolution, Figure 1C), and finally, 1-minute recordings from TMPs (0.019-Hz resolution, Figure 2C).

Apparent Conduction Block Patterns Caused by Scroll Wave Cores

Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the most common form of apparent conduction block observed in the STP. Between 150 and 400 ms, the STP (Figures 3C and 4B) shows a discontinuity in activation sequence with branching bands in the lower third. The DF corresponding to these regions (pixels 3 through 5 in Figure 4) was 11.04 Hz, with the adjacent sites on either side having lower values of 9.77 to 10.19 Hz. One possible interpretation, consistent with the mother rotor hypothesis, is that reentry (or breakthrough activation arising from a rotor underneath the mapped surface) with a frequency of 11.04 Hz was driving the adjacent domains with 11:10 conduction block occurring on either side. However, optical activation maps did not reveal such a pattern. As shown in Figure 3, no stable rotor was visualized on the transmural surface. Instead, two colliding wavefronts (Figure 3B, at arrows in a and b) resulted in the formation of a reentrant circuit (Figure 3B, c through i). The core of this reentrant circuit was located in the 11.04-Hz DF domain (sites 3 through 5 in Figure 4A). There was no evidence of conduction block in the surrounding domains with lower DF. Figure 4 illustrates that the shift to higher DF at the core compared with surrounding sites could be attributed to double potentials2,20 in the core of the scroll wave (as seen in the voltage traces at sites 3 through 5 in Figure 4C). In addition, there was a small (nondominant) peak in the FFT spectra at 22 Hz, corresponding to the double-potential frequency, which coincided with the DF harmonic. As described previously,3 this pattern of branching bands in the STP (Figures 3C and 4B) is characteristic of the core of a rotating scroll wave. This reentry was unstable both spatially (note the subtle core displacement to the right in the isochronal maps, Figure 3B, c through e) and temporally, as it was successively interrupted (Figure 3B, g and i) and resumed (Figure 3B, h and j). In Figure 3B, k through l, another wavelet invaded this area and the reentrant circuit was terminated and the branches in the STP fused together. Note that the DF in the region where this core formed was only 11.04 Hz, not double the DF of the adjacent regions (9.77 to 10.19 Hz). This reflects the fact that the segment during which double potentials were present in the voltage traces (150 to 400 ms) was only part of the total segment (0 to 2300 ms) from which the FFT spectrum was obtained and thus did not have sufficient power to become the DF. However, the high-frequency segment was sufficient to alter the relative powers of the multiple peaks in the FFT spectrum near 10 Hz so that the DF was shifted to a higher value. We confirmed this explanation by simulating the sequence with sine waves of mixed frequencies and examining the FFT spectra (data not shown).

Domain Boundaries and Apparent Wenckebach Conduction

We examined STPs for evidence of conduction block. No consistent direction of propagation gradient was present (Figures 1B and 2)A. Although rare, we occasionally identified Wenckebach-like conduction patterns in the STP (11 of 166 STPs). Figure 5 shows an example. Wenckebach-like conduction occurred once at ≈400 ms and then again at 550 ms on the STP (Figure 5B). Figure 5A shows the corresponding isochronal activation maps, and Figure 5D the optical voltage traces from sites 1 through 3 as indicated. In Figure 5Aa, a wavelet spread downward from the left upper portion of the tissue in a planar fashion, with wide isochrones across the STP line, reflecting rapid conduction. In the following activation (Figure 5Ab), this wavelet formed a reentrant circuit, whose core was near the vertical STP line. This reentry persisted for two additional rotations (Figure 5A, c and d), and then was interrupted by a wavelet spreading downward from the top (Figure 5A, e and f). The subsequent activation, also from the top (Figure 5Ag), blocked between site 1 and sites 2 and 3 (Figure 5Bg), causing a 7:6 Wenckebach-like cycle. Later, a second Wenckebach-like block occurred by a similar mechanism, but this time was due to an upward planar wave (Figure 5Ak).
Figure 5. Apparent Wenckebach conduction. A, panels a through k, Isochronal maps showing activation patterns during apparent Wenckebach conduction in the STPs shown below in panel B. Numbers refer to starting frame. All isochrones span 5 frames. Black arrows and asterisks indicate wavelet direction and breakthrough activations, respectively. Al shows the DF map during this episode, with the vertical line marking the STP sampling line in panel B. B, STPs showing apparent Wenckebach conduction near frames 400 and 550. C, Schematic of the tissue with the location of the PM. D, Optical action potentials (in arbitrary fluorescence units [F]) and their FFTs recorded at the sites labeled 1 through 3 in panel B and the pseudo-ECG. Note the broad and complex FFT spectrum at site 2 where conduction block occurs. Red lines mark starting points in respective isochronal maps in panel A. Gray arrows reflect apparent progressive conduction slowing. See text for details.
Therefore, a 7:6 Wenckebach-like conduction pattern was followed by a 4:3 Wenckebach-like cycle. Of note, the apparent block occurred in both directions (from top-to-bottom in the first case and from bottom-to-top in the second), which is inconsistent with the concept of one stable domain driving the neighboring regions. However, in both episodes, the apparent block occurred during propagation from a region of low DF (10.61 Hz at sites 1 and 3) to a region of high DF (11.46 at site 2), as shown in the accompanying FFT spectra (Figure 5C). This does not support the idea that high-DF domains correspond to regions that are better able to sustain 1:1 conduction, as postulated by the mother rotor hypothesis.

Computer Simulations

We performed computer simulations to examine the relative importance of tissue heterogeneities and APD restitution steepness. In simulated 3D tissue with a physiological degree of fiber rotation but otherwise homogeneous conditions, steep APD restitution slope in the cardiac action potential model caused spontaneous scroll wave breakup, with multiple wavelets coursing through the tissue similar to VF. The Table summarizes the average number of wavelets per mapped area, the mean lifetime of wavelets, the incidence of completed reentry, and the mean number of reentry cycles per reentry episode. The incidences of reentry on the epicardial/endocardial surfaces were similar and matched the incidence on the endocardial surface in the biological tissue experiments. In contrast, the incidence of transmural reentry was lower than on the surfaces in simulated tissue, which contrasts with the similar incidence in biological tissue. This discrepancy is probably due to the heterogeneities such as PM attachments and trabeculae in the biological experiments, which our previous mapping studies showed acted as transient anchoring points for reentry.13 These findings also indicate that the lack of morphologically identifiable scroll waves on the tissue surface does not reliably exclude scroll wave dynamics as the underlying mechanism.
We performed frequency analysis in 2D simulated tissue (due to the computational intractability for 3D tissue). In heterogeneous tissue with physiological APD restitution (slope >1) (Figure 6), we obtained similar findings as in the tissue experiments, with spatially discrete DF domains that shifted rapidly over time and space (Figure 6A). STPs across the boundaries of these domains commonly showed the branching 2:1 patterns characteristic of spiral wave cores, and patterns resembling Wenckebach-like conduction were also observed (Figure 6B). Homogeneous tissue gave similar results, except that the DF domains were smaller in size and varied over a smaller range (data not shown).
Figure 6. Spatiotemporal instability of frequency domain distribution during VF in simulated 2D heterogeneous cardiac tissue (10×10 cm) with steep APD restitution slope, reproducing the findings in Figure 1. Data from 8 seconds of simulated VF are shown. A, panels a through f, DF maps in successive 2.0- (a, b, d, and e) and 4-second (c and f) intervals for a 5×5-cm area. No consistent pattern stationary in time or space is present. Red vertical line is the line sampled for STPs. Adjacent to each panel are FFT spectra at sites labeled 1, 2, and 3. B, STPs during 0 to 4 seconds of simulated VF. Discontinuities resembling conduction block result from drifting spiral wave cores and wave collisions, but no true Wenckebach patterns are present. C, Action potentials at sites 1 through 3 and pseudo-ECG corresponding to the STPs above. FFT spectra are shown at the far right.
To reproduce DF domains whose boundaries and DF values remained stationary required heterogeneous simulated tissue with flattened APD restitution slope (Figure 7). Under these conditions, DF domains were well-defined and remained stationary in time and space (Figure 7A). STPs across these boundaries often showed clear Wenckebach-like conduction patterns as impulses propagated from a region of high-to-low DF (Figure 7B). The most rapid spiral wave, the mother rotor, was fairly stationary and located in a region with the highest DF (at the lower left corner in the spatial DF maps in Figure 7A).
Figure 7. Spatiotemporal stability of frequency domain distribution during VF in simulated 2D heterogeneous cardiac tissue (10×10 cm) with shallow APD restitution slope, reproducing previously reported findings.18,19 Data from 8 seconds of simulated VF are shown. A, panels a through f, DF maps in successive 2.0- (a, b, d, and e) and 4-second (c and f) intervals for a 5×5-cm area. DF domains are stable over both time and space. Red vertical line is the line sampled for STPs. Adjacent to each panel are FFT spectra at sites labeled 1, 2, and 3, illustrating the DF stability of each region. B, STPs during 0 to 4 seconds of simulated VF, showing Wenckebach conduction block patterns. C, Action potentials at sites 1 through 3 and pseudo-ECGs corresponding to the STPs above. FFT spectra are shown at the far right.

Discussion

The hallmark of cardiac fibrillation is ongoing wavebreak, traditionally speculated to be the engine that sustains fibrillation. The recent hypothesis11,12 that wavebreak may be an epiphenomenon, related to Wenckebach-like conduction as impulses originating from a relatively stable mother rotor unable to sustain 1:1 conduction through heterogeneous tissue, is an intriguing one. In this case, the mother rotor, rather than ongoing wavebreak, is the engine of fibrillation. The clinical implications are significant, because efforts directed at preventing ongoing wavebreak might then be therapeutically useless. The major pieces of evidence supporting the mother rotor hypothesis are as follows: (1) the correlation between DF and the frequency of reentry and breakthrough periodic activations; (2) the presence of DF domains that remain stable in space and time over many seconds12; (3) the observation in STPs of Wenckebach-like conduction at the borders between different DF domains11,12; (4) the relative infrequency of reentry on the surface of the heart during fibrillation,6 favoring an intramural location of the mother rotor; and (5) simulations suggesting that scroll waves may prefer to align their filaments along an intramural axis.21
However, we were unable to substantiate these findings. Our major observations are as follows: (1) the uniqueness of DF, defined as the highest peak in the FFT spectrum, depended on the FFT resolution. With longer acquisition times, multiple peaks were present and selection of a single DF became ambiguous (Figures 1C and 2C). These findings bring into question the significance and utility of DF as a descriptive parameter in VF14; (2) DFs were unstable, and although discrete DF domains were present, they were neither temporally nor spatially stable over a time course of seconds (Figures 1 and 2). An exception occurred at certain anatomically distinct regions, such as PM and trabecular insertions, in which DF domain boundaries remained constant in location. However, the DF values on either side of the boundary varied freely (Figures 2A and 3); (3) Additionally, the specific value of the DF and the domain boundaries also depended on the duration of the FFT analysis; for example, the DF domains for successive 2-second epochs of VF neither resembled each other nor the DF domains obtained from the combined epochs (Figure 1); (4) Optical mapping failed to identify stable intramural reentry occurring at a higher incidence than on the endocardial surfaces (Table), although it was greater than on the epicardial surface. An important limitation, however, is that we could map only a limited portion of intramural myocardium, so stable reentry could have existed elsewhere and been missed; and (5) Apparent conduction block patterns on STPs most typically showed a pseudo-2:1 pattern. However, activation mapping and identification of double potentials on optical traces in these cases showed that this pattern was due to the core of a spiral/scroll wave migrating through this region rather than conduction block (Figures 3 and 4). Wenckebach-like conduction was observed rarely (Figure 5), but when it was, it did not consistently occur at high-to-low DF domain borders. In summary, our findings suggest that in the fibrillating arterially perfused swine ventricle, DFs, frequency domains, and boundaries are dynamically generated by wavelet behavior rather than by anatomically determined conduction block.
The discrepancies between our findings and those of Chen et al11 and Zaitsev et al12 may be due to experimental conditions and/or species differences. Our computer simulations provide some insights into possible explanations. The first point is that when a wavebreak-driven fibrillation-like state is produced in tissue that is homogeneous except for fiber rotation, completed reentrant circuits were observed with a similarly low incidence (4% to 12%, Table). When wavebreak occurred in this setting, the broken end (tip or filament) tried to form a morphological spiral/scroll wave but usually could not complete a full loop of reentry due to interactions with other wavelets. Thus, failure to observe reentrant circuits does not exclude spiral/scroll wave dynamics as the underlying mechanism. Also, the lower incidence of reentry on the transmural surfaces, compared with the epicardial or endocardial surfaces in simulated 3D tissue, could not substantiate a preference for filaments to align parallel to the epicardial and endocardial surfaces, as described by Berenfeld et al.21 In biological tissue, anchoring to anatomical features such as PM insertions and trabeculae is a known factor accounting for the majority of reentrant circuits on the transmural surface.13
To reproduce our experimental findings of unstable DF domains required the combination of steep APD restitution and tissue heterogeneity. Under these conditions, DF domains had similar characteristics to those observed experimentally, including pseudo-2:1 Wenckebach conduction patterns produced by the cores of spiral/scroll waves (Figure 6). Higher-order Wenckebach-like conduction was also observed, but as in the swine ventricle, did not occur exclusively at high-to-low DF domain borders.
Finally, to reproduce the findings reported by Chen et al11 and Zaitsev et al12 required flattening APD restitution slope to <1, as well as introducing nonuniform heterogeneities. The latter type of heterogeneity is different from the uniform heterogeneity (base-to-apex14 or endocardial-to-epicardial17) that characterizes normal ventricular myocardium. In these conditions, DF domains became spatiotemporally stationary, and Wenckebach-conduction block occurred at borders between high-to-low DF domains (Figure 7). Most of the experiments of Zaitsev et al12 were performed in the presence of the excitation-contraction uncoupler diacetyl monoxime (DAM), which is known to flatten APD restitution slope.9 However, recognizing this drawback, they performed additional experiments in the absence of DAM and obtained similar results.12 In the arterially perfused swine ventricle, APD restitution slope during VF or pacing is typically >1, but whether this is true under their experimental conditions11,12 is unknown. One factor that can make APD restitution slope shallower is acute ischemia, which also promotes nonuniform heterogeneity in regional electrophysiological properties.22–24 Both alterations would favor the mother rotor mechanism.
In conclusion, both the restitution-based dynamic wavebreak mechanism and the mother rotor mechanism, coupled with preexisting tissue heterogeneity causing dispersion of refractoriness,25 may be relevant clinically in the maintenance of VF. Our observations suggest that during the initial phases of VF, dynamic wavebreak is likely to be very important in maintaining VF. However, as VF proceeds, the heart becomes ischemic, flattening APD restitution22 and promoting nonuniform regional electrophysiological heterogeneity, conditions under which we speculate that the mother rotor mechanism may become increasingly important.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIH Specialized Center of Research in Sudden Death P50-HL-52319, NIH R01 HL-66389, American Heart Association (AHA) National Grants-in-Aid 9750623N, 9950464N, and 0130171N (Z.Q.), a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award from the AHA, Western States Affiliate (M.V.), a Cedars-Sinai Electrocardiographic Heartbeat Organization (ECHO) Foundation Award (H.S.K.), a Pauline and Harold Price Endowment (P.-S.C.), the Ralph M. Parsons Foundation, and the Laubisch and Kawata Endowments (J.N.W.). We thank Elaine Lebowitz, Avile McCullen, and Tan Duong for assistance.

Footnote

Original received August 2, 2001; revision received December 3, 2001; accepted December 3, 2001.

Supplemental Material

File (3117-r2_online.pdf)

References

1.
Moe GK, Rheinboldt WL, Abildskov JA. A computer model of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1964; 64: 200–220.
2.
Allessie MA, Bonke FI, Schopman FJ. Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia. III. The “leading circle” concept: a new model of circus movement in cardiac tissue without the involvement of an anatomical obstacle. Circ Res. 1977; 41: 9–18.
3.
Davidenko JM, Pertsov AM, Salomonsz R, Baxter W, Jalife J. Stationary and drifting spiral waves of excitation in isolated cardiac tissue. Nature. 1992; 355: 349–351.
4.
Ideker RE, Klein GJ, Harrison L, Smith WM, Kasell J, Reimer KA, Wallace AG, Gallagher JJ. The transition to ventricular fibrillation induced by reperfusion after acute ischemia in the dog: a period of organized epicardial activation. Circulation. 1981; 63: 1371–1379.
5.
Chen P-S, Wolf PD, Dixon EG, Danieley ND, Frazier DW, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Mechanism of ventricular vulnerability to single premature stimuli in open-chest dogs. Circ Res. 1988; 62: 1191–1209.
6.
Rogers JM, Huang J, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Incidence, evolution, and spatial distribution of functional reentry during ventricular fibrillation in pigs. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 945–954.
7.
Qu Z, Weiss JN, Garfinkel A. Cardiac electrical restitution properties and stability of reentrant spiral waves: a simulation study. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276: H269–H283.
8.
Qu Z, Xie F, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Origins of spiral wave meander and breakup in a two-dimensional cardiac tissue model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000; 28: 755–771.
9.
Riccio ML, Koller ML, Gilmour RFJ. Electrical restitution and spatiotemporal organization during ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 955–963.
10.
Garfinkel A, Kim Y-H, Voroshilovsky O, Qu Z, Kil JR, Lee M-H, Karagueuzian HS, Weiss JN, Chen P-S. Preventing ventricular fibrillation by flattening cardiac restitution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 6061–6066.
11.
Chen J, Mandapati R, Berenfeld O, Skanes AC, Jalife J. High-frequency periodic sources underlie ventricular fibrillation in the isolated rabbit heart. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 86–93.
12.
Zaitsev AV, Berenfeld O, Mironov SF, Jalife J, Pertsov AM. Distribution of excitation frequencies on the epicardial and endocardial surfaces of fibrillating ventricular wall of the sheep heart. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 408–417.
13.
Valderrábano M, Lee M-H, Ohara T, Lai AC, Lin S-F, Fishbein MC, Karagueuzian H, Chen P-S. Dynamics of transmural and intramural reentry during ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine ventricles. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 839–848.
14.
Choi BR, Liu T, Salama G. The distribution of refractory periods influences the dynamics of ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 2001; 88: e49–e58.
15.
Luo CH, Rudy Y. A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential: depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction. Circ Res. 1991; 68: 1501–1526.
16.
Kim Y-H, Garfinkel A, Ikeda T, Wu T-J, Athill CA, Weiss JN, Karagueuzian HS, Chen P-S. Spatiotemporal complexity of ventricular fibrillation revealed by tissue mass reduction in isolated swine right ventricle: further evidence for the quasiperiodic route to chaos hypothesis. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 2486–2500.
17.
Yan GX, Shimizu W, Antzelevitch C. Characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1921–1927.
18.
Qu Z, Kil J, Xie F, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Scroll wave dynamics in a three-dimensional cardiac tissue model: roles of restitution, thickness, and fiber rotation. Biophys J. 2000; 78: 2761–2775.
19.
Xie F, Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Electrophysiological heterogeneity and stability of reentry in simulated cardiac tissue. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H535–H545.
20.
Efimov IR, Sidorov V, Cheng Y, Wollenzier B. Evidence of three-dimensional scroll waves with ribbon-shaped filament as a mechanism of ventricular tachycardia in the isolated rabbit heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999; 10: 1452–1462.
21.
Berenfeld O, Pertsov AM. Dynamics of intramural scroll waves in three-dimensional continuous myocardium with rotational anisotropy. J Theor Biol. 1999; 199: 383–394.
22.
Janse MJ, Kleber AG. Electrophysiological changes and ventricular arrhythmias in the early phase of regional myocardial ischemia. Circ Res. 1981; 49: 1069–1081.
23.
Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Electrophysiologic effects of acute myocardial ischemia: a mechanistic investigation of action potential conduction and conduction failure. Circ Res. 1997; 80: 124–138.
24.
Xie F, Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Effects of simulated ischemia on spiral wave stability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280: H1667–H1673.
25.
Laurita KR, Girouard SD, Akar FG, Rosenbaum DS. Modulated dispersion explains changes in arrhythmia vulnerability during premature stimulation of the heart. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2774–2780.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Circulation Research
Circulation Research
Pages: 213 - 222
PubMed: 11834715

Versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

History

Published online: 13 December 2001
Published in print: 8 February 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. fibrillation
  2. Fourier transform
  3. restitution
  4. reentry

Authors

Affiliations

Miguel Valderrábano
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Junzhong Yang
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Chikaya Omichi
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
John Kil
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Scott T. Lamp
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Zhilin Qu
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Shien-Fong Lin
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Hrayr S. Karagueuzian
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Alan Garfinkel
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
Peng-Sheng Chen
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.
James N. Weiss
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (M.V., C.O., S.-F.L., H.S.K., P.-S.C.), and Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and Physiology and Physiological Science, UCLA School of Medicine (J.Y., J.K., S.T.L., Z.Q., A.G., J.N.W.), Los Angeles, Calif.

Notes

Correspondence to James N. Weiss, MD, Division of Cardiology, 3645 MRL Bldg, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1760. E-mail [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

  1. The transient outward potassium current plays a key role in spiral wave breakup in ventricular tissue, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 320, 2, (H826-H837), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00608.2020
    Crossref
  2. Feasibility of selection of antiarrhythmic drug treatment on the basis of arrhythmogenic mechanism — Relevance of electrical restitution, wavebreak and rotors, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 176, (1-12), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.10.002
    Crossref
  3. Global Bi-ventricular endocardial distribution of activation rate during long duration ventricular fibrillation in normal and heart failure canines, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17, 1, (2017).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0530-5
    Crossref
  4. Nonlinear and stochastic dynamics in the heart, Physics Reports, 543, 2, (61-162), (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.05.002
    Crossref
  5. Developing a novel comprehensive framework for the investigation of cellular and whole heart electrophysiology in the in situ human heart: Historical perspectives, current progress and future prospects, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 115, 2-3, (252-260), (2014).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.06.004
    Crossref
  6. Evaluación de la complejidad de la activación miocárdica durante la fibrilación ventricular. Estudio experimental, Revista Española de Cardiología, 66, 3, (177-184), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2012.08.014
    Crossref
  7. Evaluation of the Complexity of Myocardial Activation During Ventricular Fibrillation. An Experimental Study, Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 66, 3, (177-184), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2012.08.012
    Crossref
  8. Ventricular Fibrillation Conduction through an Isthmus of Preserved Myocardium between Radiofrequency Lesions, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36, 3, (286-298), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12060
    Crossref
  9. Bi-stable wave propagation and early afterdepolarization–mediated cardiac arrhythmias, Heart Rhythm, 9, 1, (115-122), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.014
    Crossref
  10. Deciphering the electrogram in ventricular fibrillation to extract physiological information, Heart Rhythm, 8, 5, (750-751), (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.02.018
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Frequency Analysis of Ventricular Fibrillation in Swine Ventricles
Circulation Research
  • Vol. 90
  • No. 2

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Circulation Research
  • Vol. 90
  • No. 2
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response