Skip to main content
Abstract
Originally Published 12 February 2020
Free Access

Abstract 30: Prediction Scale Thresholds Selected to Rule Out Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Result in Very Low Positive Predictive Values and Many False Positives

Abstract

Introduction: Many prior large vessel occlusion (LVO) prevalence and prediction scale accuracy studies have not had samples representative of a prehospital suspected stroke population. To address this, we studied emergency medical systems (EMS) identified prehospital suspected stroke patients brought to the Emergency Department (ED) at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital from July 2017 to July 2018.
Methods: Patients were eligible for the prevalence study if the EMS prehospital alert call included suspected stroke with a last known well time within 6 hours and a positive Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale. LVO prediction scale scores were retrospectively calculated from arrival NIHSS subitems. We excluded patients missing NIHSS scores and scales requiring non-NIHSS data. LVO stroke included internal carotid, M1, M2, or basilar arteries. Diagnoses were determined by chart review. Prevalences, scale scores, and accuracy statistics were then calculated. We prespecified that negative results of scale thresholds must reduce the post-test probability to ≤5% to rule out LVO stroke and positive results must increase the post-test probability to ≥80% to rule in LVO stroke.
Results: Of 220 EMS transported patients there were 30 LVO strokes (13.6%), 35 ICHs (15.9%), 45 non-LVO strokes (20.5%), and 110 mimics (50%). There were 184 patients eligible for the LVO prediction study. Table 1 shows the accuracy statistics of qualifying scale thresholds.
False positive rates ranged from 58% to 80%. Only FAST-ED ≥7 resulted in a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥80% but this missed 83% of LVO strokes.
Conclusions: The prevalence of LVO stroke among EMS suspected acute stroke patients brought to our ED over one year was 13.6%. Prediction scale thresholds selected to rule out LVO stroke result in very low PPVs and many false positives. No scale achieved a PPV above 50% while maintaining a sensitivity above 50% suggesting limitations in the ability of scales to rule in LVO stroke.

eLetters(0)

eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published in print: February 2020
Published online: 12 February 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. Prehospital care
  2. Occlusion
  3. Emergency medical services (EMS)
  4. Stroke Emergency Cerebrovascular care
  5. Neuroendovascular (for stroke)

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin J Keenan
Neurology, Univ of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
Wade S Smith
Neurology, Univ of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Sara Cole
Neurology, Univ of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Christine Martin
Neurology, Univ of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
J Claude Hemphill
Neurology, Univ of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Debbie Y Madhok
Neurology, Univ of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Notes

Author Disclosures: For author disclosure information, please visit the ASA International Stroke Conference 2020 Online Program Planner and search for the abstract title.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

View options

PDF and All Supplements

Download PDF and All Supplements
Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Personal login Institutional Login
Purchase Options

Purchase this article to access the full text.

Purchase access to this article for 24 hours

Abstract 30: Prediction Scale Thresholds Selected to Rule Out Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Result in Very Low Positive Predictive Values and Many False Positives
Stroke
  • Vol. 51
  • No. Suppl_1

Purchase access to this journal for 24 hours

Stroke
  • Vol. 51
  • No. Suppl_1
Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share

Comment Response