Skip main navigation
×

Prevalence, Prognosis, and Implications of Isolated Minor Nonspecific ST-Segment and T-Wave Abnormalities in Older Adults

Cardiovascular Health Study
Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772541Circulation. 2008;118:2790–2796

Abstract

Background— The prevalence and prognostic significance of isolated minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities (NSSTTAs) in older adults are poorly understood.

Methods and Results— Cardiovascular Health Study participants free of both clinical cardiovascular disease and major ECG abnormalities were included. We examined the prospective association of isolated minor NSSTTAs (defined by Minnesota Codes 4–3, 4–4, 5–3, and 5–4) with total, cardiovascular, and coronary mortality and incident nonfatal myocardial infarction. Among 3224 participants (61.9% women; mean age, 72 years), 233 (7.2%) had isolated NSSTTAs at baseline. Covariates associated with isolated NSSTTAs included older age, nonwhite race (20.5% of blacks versus 4.8% of whites; P<0.001), diabetes, and higher blood pressure and body mass index but not the presence of subclinical cardiovascular disease. After 39 518 person-years of follow-up, the presence of isolated NSSTTAs was associated with significantly increased risk for coronary heart disease mortality (multivariable-adjusted hazards ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.61) but not with incident nonfatal myocardial infarction (multivariable-adjusted hazards ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.17). The association of isolated NSSTTAs with coronary death was independent of subclinical atherosclerosis and left ventricular mass measures. In secondary analyses, among those with cardiac death, there was a significantly higher rate of primary arrhythmic death (32.3% versus 15.4%; P=0.02) in participants with isolated NSSTTAs versus those without NSSTTAs.

Conclusions— Isolated NSSTTAs are common in older Americans and are associated with significantly increased risk for coronary death. However, isolated NSSTTAs are not associated with incident nonfatal myocardial infarction, suggesting that they are associated particularly with increased risk for primary arrhythmic death.

Minor ECG abnormalities, especially minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities (NSSTTAs), are common in asymptomatic individuals and often occur in the absence of other ECG abnormalities.1–4 Isolated minor NSSTTAs generally represent very minor or upsloping ST-segment depression and flat or minimally inverted T waves. In middle-aged individuals, these isolated NSSTTAs are associated with increased relative risks for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality.1–7 The risks associated with isolated NSSTTAs are independent of other CVD risk factors, and the magnitude of increased risk is similar to that associated with elevated levels of traditional CVD risk factors such as smoking, diabetic status, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension.8–10 However, studies of the prevalence of and the association between isolated NSSTTAs and CVD have been carried out disproportionately in middle-aged, white male populations. Data are sparse regarding the prevalence of isolated NSSTTAs in individuals ≥65 years of age,1,11–13 and no studies have reported gender and race differences in older adults. Furthermore, the risks for CVD and mortality associated with isolated NSSTTAs in older adults are poorly described, and the mechanisms by which isolated NSSTTAs may be associated with increased risk are unclear.1

Clinical Perspective p 2796

The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) is a large, observational cohort of white and black men and women ≥65 years of age. Given its well-characterized cohort, standardized assessment of ECGs using Minnesota Code (MC) criteria, longitudinal follow-up, and careful documentation of risk factors and CVD events, CHS provides a unique opportunity to assess the prevalence of isolated minor NSSTTAs, to identify differences across gender and race, to examine whether isolated minor NSSTTAs are associated with increased risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD and CHD events in older adults, and to explore potential mechanisms for this association.

Methods

Study Sample

Methods of selection and recruitment of the CHS cohort have been described in detail.14,15 Briefly, CHS is a population-based, prospective, observational study designed to identify risk factors for the onset and progression of CVD and CHD in older adults. Participants were identified from Medicare eligibility lists in 4 US communities: Washington County, Maryland; Forsyth County, North Carolina; Sacramento County, Calif; and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Eligible participants were ≥65 years, gave informed consent, and were expecting to live in a defined geographic area for at least 3 years. Excluded individuals were wheelchair bound, institutionalized, receiving active cancer treatment, or in hospice care. Prevalent coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure were not exclusion criteria for the main study. An original cohort of 5201 individuals was recruited in 1989 to 1990, and an additional 687 blacks were recruited in 1992 to 1993; therefore, data were available from 5888 study participants. The study was periodically reviewed and approved by Institutional Review boards at participating institutions, and the present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University.

Clinical Assessment and Measurements

At study enrollment, clinically evident CVD was determined as described previously.16 Baseline risk factors for CVD, including diabetes mellitus status, fasting blood chemistry and lipid tests, blood pressure, and anthropometric and other objective measurements, were obtained according to standardized procedures.14 The ankle-arm index (the ratio of ankle to brachial supine systolic blood pressure) and common and internal intima-media thickness of the carotid artery were measured at baseline by carotid artery duplex sonography in both cohorts.17 Left ventricular (LV) mass index was determined from the ECG voltage product18 and divided by height in meters raised to the 2.7th power.

Digitally recorded 12-lead ECGs were obtained at rest using standardized procedures at the baseline examination for both cohorts. ECGs were analyzed electronically, with manual overreading by trained cardiologists to ensure quality control, at the ECG Reading Center (EPICARE, Wake Forest University). ECGs were classified by MC19 and Novacode20 criteria using variables derived from the median complex of the Marquette measurement matrix.

CHS investigators have created a composite index for subclinical CVD that combines measures from different vascular beds.21 We used a modified version of this composite index that is defined as “present” in subjects with no prior adjudicated history of CVD if any of the following were present at baseline: ankle-arm index ≤0.90; internal carotid wall thickness >80th percentile, common carotid wall thickness >80th percentile, or carotid stenosis ≥25%; major ECG abnormality (excluded for this analysis as detailed below); or Rose Questionnaire positive for angina or intermittent claudication.21

ECG Analysis and Exclusions

We focused on minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave changes described by MCs 4–3, 4–4, 5–3, and 5–4, defined briefly as follows: ST junction depression <0.5 mm (MC 4–3); ST junction depression >1 mm and ST segment ascending, ie, upsloping (MC 4–4); T wave flat, diphasic, or inverted <1 mm (MC 5–3); and T-wave amplitude positive and ratio of T- to R-wave amplitude <1:20, ie, flattened T wave (MC 5–4).19 Defining criteria for NSSTTAs are provided in detail in Table 1.

Table 1. MC Definitions for Minor NSSTTAs

MCDefinition
4–3No ST-J depression as much as 0.5 mm but ST-segment downward sloping and ST-segment or T-wave nadir at least 0.5 mm below P-R baseline in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V2 to V6
4–4ST-J depression of ≥1.0 mm and ST-segment upward sloping or U shaped in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V1 to V6
5–3T-wave amplitude of 0 (flat), negative, or diphasic (negative-positive type only) with <1.0-mm negative phase in lead I, II, V3 to V6, or lead aVL when R-wave amplitude is ≥5.0 mm
5–4T-wave amplitude positive and T- to R-wave amplitude ratio of <1:20 in any of leads I, II, aVL, or V3 to V6 when R-wave amplitude in the corresponding leads was ≥10.0 mm

For the present analysis, we wished to study isolated NSSTTAs in individuals without definite clinical cardiac disease. We excluded participants with documented prior myocardial infarction (MI; n=562), coronary bypass graft surgery (n=247), coronary angioplasty (n=95), congestive heart failure (n=275), or angina (n=964). In total, 1264 participants were excluded with prevalent cardiac disease at baseline. To study isolated NSSTTAs, we next excluded, in a hierarchical fashion, participants with ECG findings typically associated with secondary ST-T changes: MC 1–1 and 1–2 (pathological Q waves, n=129), MC 3–2 with STTAs (LV hypertrophy with STTAs, n=133), MC 6–1 (complete atrioventricular block, n=0), MC 6–4 (Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern, n=2), MC 6–8 (artificial pacemaker, n=49), MC 7–1 (left bundle-branch block, n=58), MC 7–2 (right bundle-branch block, n=168), MC 7–4 (other intraventricular block with QRS duration ≥120 ms, n=86), MC 8–2 (persistent ventricular rhythms, n=0), and MC 8–3 (atrial fibrillation, n=87). Next, we excluded 596 participants with major STTAs (MC 4–1, 4–2, 5–1, or 5–2), 93 participants who were receiving digitalis glycosides at the baseline examination, and 9 remaining participants with suppression codes for reading NSSTTAs. Therefore, 3224 participants with no major ECG abnormalities were analyzed in the present study.

Adjudication of Outcome Events

The present investigation includes data on nonfatal and fatal CVD and CHD events through June 30, 2006.22 The mean duration of follow-up among nondecedents was 15.1±1.1 years (median, 15.5 years; interquartile range, 15.2 to 15.8 years). Participants reported primarily clinical outcomes every 6 months. In addition, comprehensive information was collected for incident CVD events and death, including clinic and hospital records, death certificates, autopsy reports, local obituaries, interviews of next of kin, and physician questionnaires. To augment the detection of deaths and hospitalizations, data from the Health Care Financing Administration database were compared with the CHS events database. Through these methods, as well as through interviews of contacts and proxies for participants lost to follow-up, we accounted for vital status in 100% of our participants.

A CHS Events Committee, comprising a panel of physicians, adjudicated all incident events and deaths using standardized criteria described in detail elsewhere.22 MI was classified using an algorithm that included clinical history of cardiac chest pain, cardiac enzymes, and ECG changes.22 Incident nonfatal MI is defined as an MI that did not result in death within 4 weeks of the event. All subjects with definite fatal MI were excluded from the incident nonfatal MI category. All deaths were classified by the CHS Events Committee into 1 of 5 groups: (1) atherosclerotic CHD; (2) cerebrovascular disease; (3) atherosclerotic disease other than CHD (other arteriosclerotic CVD such as abdominal aortic aneurysm or ischemic bowel); (4) other CVD (such as valvular heart disease or pulmonary embolism); and (5) all other deaths. The term CVD mortality is used to denote death resulting from causes 1 through 4. CHD mortality (cause 1) included death resulting from (1) definite fatal MI (no known nonatherosclerotic cause and definite MI within 4 weeks of death), (2) definite fatal CHD (no known nonatherosclerotic cause of death and 1 or both of the following: chest pain within 72 hours of death or history of chronic ischemic heart disease in the absence of valvular heart disease or nonischemic cardiomyopathy), and (3) possible fatal CHD (no known nonatherosclerotic cause and death certificate consistent with CHD death). Participants with CVD death, excluding those with death from cerebrovascular disease (ie, cause 1, 3, or 4), were subsequently classified according to mechanism of death into the following groups: (1) primary arrhythmic (death within 5 minutes in otherwise asymptomatic individual), (2) secondary arrhythmic/mechanical (death with preceding symptoms of heart disease but no evidence of chronic myocardial pump failure), (3) congestive heart failure (death resulting from shock or low-output syndrome), (4) cardiac procedure (death related to CABG or angioplasty), (5) multiple mechanism (death in an individual with severe chronic heart failure who died of ventricular arrhythmia), and (6) hemorrhage from thrombolytic therapy.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics were compared between participants with and without isolated NSSTTAs by use of χ2 tests for categorical variables and t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables as appropriate. We then compared event rates (Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence) of the outcomes of interest, including all-cause death, CVD death, CHD death, incident MI, incident stroke, and non-CVD death in those with and without isolated NSSTTAs, using log-rank tests. To examine the prospective association between isolated NSSTTAs and outcomes, we used Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Proportional-hazards assumptions were checked and found to be appropriate. Three models were fitted to assess the association between isolated NSSTTAs and each outcome: adjusted for age, sex, and race (model 1); adjusted for model 1 covariates plus diabetes status, smoking status, and baseline levels of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, creatinine, and C-reactive protein (model 2); and adjusted for model 2 covariates plus common carotid intima-media thickness and ECG LV mass index (model 3). Multivariable-adjusted models for CHD death were also fitted to examine for potential differences in subgroups by sex, race, and presence of subclinical CVD. Multiplicative interaction terms between isolated NSSTTAs and each of these stratifying covariates were entered into separate models with the main effect covariates to examine for interactions. In addition, in secondary analyses, rates of CVD death by mechanism were compared in those with and without isolated NSSTTAs with χ2 tests tests. All analyses were performed with STATA/SE 8.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, Tex). Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.

Results

The study sample consisted of 3224 participants, of whom 61.9% were women, with a mean age of 72 years; 233 (7.2%) participants had isolated minor NSSTTAs (see Table 1) at baseline in the absence of other ECG abnormalities. Of the 233 participants with any isolated NSSTTAs (MC 4–3, 4–4, 5–3, or 5–4), 6 had ST-segment deviation (MC 4–3 or 4–4), 217 had T-wave abnormalities (MC 5–3 or 5–4), and 10 had both. Thus, T-wave abnormalities made up the vast majority of isolated NSSTTAs. Baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of isolated NSSTTAs are shown in Table 2. Those with isolated NSSTTAs were slightly older, were more likely to be diabetic, and had higher blood pressure, body mass index, common carotid intima-media thickness, and ECG LV mass index at baseline. The prevalence of NSSTTAs was significantly higher, >4 times more prevalent, in blacks compared with whites (20.5% and 4.8%, respectively).

Table 2. Baseline Characteristics

No Major or Minor ECG Abnormalities (n=2991)Isolated Minor NSSTTAs (n=233)P
HDL indicates high-density lipoprotein; BP, blood pressure; and CC-IMT, common carotid intima-media thickness.
*Mean±SD unless otherwise indicated.
†Defined according to American Diabetes Association guidelines based on fasting glucose >126 mg/dL, current use of insulin, or oral hypoglycemic medication.
‡Median (25th to 75th percentiles).
§Defined by presence of ankle-arm index ≤0.90, CC-IMT >80th percentile, carotid stenosis ≥25%, or Rose angina or claudication positive.
Age, y*72.0±5.372.7±5.30.03
Female sex (n=1995), %61.666.10.17
Race, %<0.001
    White (n=2727)86.856.7
    Black (n=478)12.742.1
    Other (n=19)0.531.29
Diabetic (n=414), %12.320.20.001
Current smoker (n=399), %12.510.30.32
Total cholesterol, mg/dL213.1±38.5212.2±38.90.72
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL56.2±16.156.8±16.30.59
Systolic BP, mm Hg133.9±20.5141.5±21.5<0.001
Diastolic BP, mm Hg70.7±10.973.6±11.9<0.001
Body mass index, kg/m226.4±4.628.1±5.3<0.001
C-reactive protein, mg/L2.3 (1.1–4.1)2.7 (1.4–4.4)0.03
CC-IMT, mm1.00 (0.89–1.12)1.05 (0.96–1.16)<0.001
ECG LV mass index37.4 (33.8–41.6)40.3 (36.6–45.1)<0.001
Any subclinical CVD§ (n=1726), %53.357.10.26

During 39 518 person-years of follow-up, there were 1592 deaths resulting from all causes, including 502 caused by CVD (of which 295 were due to CHD) and 1090 caused by non-CVD causes. There were 368 incident nonfatal MIs (in 37 571 person-years) and 433 incident strokes (in 37 191 person-years). The Figure displays the unadjusted event rates for each end point stratified by the presence of isolated NSSTTAs at baseline. Participants with isolated NSSTTAs had a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality, which was due largely to significantly higher rates of CVD death, particularly CHD death. Of interest, there was no significant difference in the rate of incident nonfatal MI despite the significant difference in CHD death.

Figure. Unadjusted event rates for specified end points in those with no major or minor ECG abnormalities vs those with NSSTTAs. NFMI indicates nonfatal MI.

After adjustment for clinical covariates (Table 3), there was no substantial attenuation in the hazards ratio for any end point. After adjustment for clinical covariates, the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis, and LV mass index, there were still no substantial changes in the hazards ratios. Isolated NSSTTAs were most strongly associated with CHD death independently of clinical covariates and subclinical CVD. Further adjustment for antihypertensive or lipid-lowering therapy use at baseline did not alter the hazards ratios materially (data not shown).

Table 3. Multivariable-Adjusted Hazards Ratios for Different Outcomes Among Participants With Isolated Minor NSSTTAs Compared With Those With No Major or Minor ECG Abnormalities

OutcomeModel 1Model 2Model 3
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, and race. Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race, diabetes status, smoking status, baseline level of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, creatinine, and C-reactive protein. Model 3: adjusted for all covariates in model 2 plus common carotid intima-media thickness and ECG left ventricular mass index.
All-cause death1.21 (1.01–1.46)1.18 (0.97–1.43)1.20 (0.98–1.46)
CVD death1.65 (1.22–2.23)1.53 (1.12–2.08)1.53 (1.12–2.10)
CHD death1.83 (1.25–2.68)1.72 (1.16–2.55)1.76 (1.18–2.61)
Incident nonfatal MI0.77 (0.48–1.25)0.70 (0.42–1.15)0.71 (0.43–1.17)
Incident stroke1.39 (0.99–1.94)1.32 (0.94–1.86)1.28 (0.90–1.81)
Non-CVD death1.02 (0.80–1.31)1.02 (0.79–1.31)1.05 (0.81–1.35)

In subgroup analyses, we found no evidence for interactions with isolated NSSTTAs by age groups, sex, race, or presence or absence of subclinical CVD at baseline. Isolated NSSTTAs were associated with similar increases in risk for CHD death in men and women, in whites and blacks, and in those with and without subclinical CVD at baseline (all P≥0.20 for interaction). Although participants with isolated NSSTTAs had greater common carotid intima-media thickness and LV mass index at baseline (Table 1), the hazards ratios for CHD death associated with isolated NSSTTAs were similar for those with common carotid intima-media thickness and LV mass index above and below the median, with no significant interactions (data not shown).

Given the association between isolated NSSTTAs and CHD death, in secondary, hypothesis-generating analyses, we examined data on the mechanism of cardiac death. Participants with cardiac death (CVD death resulting from causes other than cerebrovascular death) were subsequently classified according to the most important mechanism that contributed to cardiac death. In Table 4, rates of the different mechanisms of cardiac death are stratified by the presence and absence of isolated NSSTTAs. A significantly greater proportion of participants with isolated NSSTTAs had primary arrhythmia as the most important mechanism contributing to their cardiac death compared with those without isolated NSSTTAs. Rates of other mechanisms of cardiac death were similar between those with and without isolated NSSTTAs. Adjustment for age, race, and sex did not alter these findings.

Table 4. Mechanism of Cardiac Death Stratified by Presence or Absence of Isolated NSSTTAs

No Major or Minor ECG AbnormalitiesIsolated Minor NSSTTAP
*Defined as death within 5 minutes in an otherwise asymptomatic individual.
†Defined as death with preceding symptoms of heart disease but no evidence of chronic myocardial pump failure.
‡Defined as death resulting from shock or low-output syndrome.
§Defined as death related to CABG or angioplasty.
∥Defined as death caused by ventricular arrhythmia in an individual with known severe chronic heart failure.
Cardiac deaths, n29231
Primary arrhythmic death,* %15.432.30.02
Secondary arrhythmic death, %45.935.50.27
CHF, %20.916.10.64
Cardiac procedure,§ %3.46.50.32
Multiple mechanism, %14.09.70.78
Hemorrhage from thrombolytic therapy, %0.30>0.99

Discussion

Principal Findings

To the best of our knowledge, these results are among the first to examine the prognostic significance of isolated NSSTTAs for CVD end points in older adults.1 In this large cohort of older Americans followed up for more than a decade, we observed that isolated minor NSSTTAs were fairly common and were associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, with nearly a doubling of risk for CHD death specifically. However, isolated NSSTTAs are not associated with increased risk for incident nonfatal MI. The increased risk for CHD death associated with isolated NSSTTAs is present even after adjustment for important clinical covariates and the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis or LV mass index. The risk appears similar for men and women, for whites and blacks, and for those with and without subclinical atherosclerosis or higher LV mass index.

Potential Mechanisms

Previous investigators speculated that isolated NSSTTAs might signify the presence of subclinical coronary disease or elevated LV mass, but they lacked data to assess these postulated mechanisms.2,3,5 Our study benefited from the design of the CHS, which allowed examination of the prevalence of isolated NSSTTAs with MC criteria, of the prognosis associated with isolated NSSTTAs, and of possible mechanisms by which isolated NSSTTAs may increase risk for adverse outcomes. In CHS, adjustment for subclinical atherosclerosis measures and LV mass had little effect on the size of the association between isolated NSSTTAs and CVD end points.

These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that the mechanism of association between isolated NSSTTAs and increased risk for fatal CHD may not be attributed solely to the presence of underlying subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.23 Newman et al24 showed previously that major ECG abnormalities were not significantly associated with the presence or extent of coronary artery calcification in the CHS cohort.

The present finding that isolated NSSTTAs were associated with increased risk for CHD death in particular, but not with incident nonfatal MI, would suggest the hypothesis that a proximate mechanism of arrhythmia may be one of the causes of the association, not coronary atherosclerosis or increased LV mass alone. That the association was statistically independent of subclinical atherosclerosis and LV mass also supports the hypothesis that the risk of isolated NSSTTAs may be mediated through arrhythmias. We tested this hypothesis with the analyses examining mechanisms of cardiac death because CHS did not allow heart failure or sudden cardiac death to be coded as causes of death (these were defined by protocol as mechanisms, but not underlying causes, of death). Although these were secondary analyses, we found a significantly higher rate of primary arrhythmic death in participants with isolated NSSTTAs compared with those without NSSTTAs. Congestive heart failure does not appear to drive the association between NSSTTAs and CHD mortality given that the rates of cardiac death that resulted from a congestive heart failure mechanism were not increased in patients with NSSTTAs compared with those without NSSTTAs. Taken together, these data suggest the hypothesis that isolated NSSTTAs may be a marker of increased risk for arrhythmic death in asymptomatic elderly persons, and future adequately powered studies are warranted to test this hypothesis with a well-defined end point of sudden cardiac death.

Whereas several studies have reported increased risk for CVD and CHD mortality in younger cohorts independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors,2–4 the mechanisms by which isolated NSSTTAs might confer increased risk remain poorly understood. Isolated NSSTTAs have been ascribed to transient physiological phenomena such as ingestion of food, change in posture, or emotional distress.25,26 Other postulated explanations for isolated NSSTTAs have included hyperventilation, central nervous system lesions, abnormalities in LV wall motion in the absence of coronary artery disease, persistent juvenile pattern, electrolyte disturbances, use of drugs (ie, digitalis, antiarrhythmic, and psychotropic drugs), or athletic ability.25,27–30 None of these postulated mechanisms, however, appears to explain the significant independent association between isolated NSSTTAs and fatal CHD that has been observed in this and other large population-based studies. Furthermore, after exclusions were applied to define isolated minor NSSTTAs in the present study sample, no participants had evidence of Brugada syndrome or a recently described pattern of early repolarization that may be associated with sudden cardiac arrest.31 The present study suggests that the presence of isolated NSSTTAs in older individuals, regardless of mechanism, may be cause for concern.

Current Study in Context

Previous studies of middle-aged individuals have established that minor ECG abnormalities are associated with higher risk for mortality, especially CVD and CHD mortality, and, to a lesser extent, with increased risk for nonfatal CHD and CVD events.1,2,4–7,32–40 In a recent systematic review of the literature,1 it was noted that the prevalence of isolated minor NSSTTAs (MC 4–3, 4–4, 5–3, or 5–4) ranged from 3.6% to 10.3% in middle-aged white men, and it appeared to be consistently higher among women, blacks, and older individuals, although data are limited. Other investigators have observed a higher prevalence of CVD risk factors in subjects with NSSTTAs, as we did.3,4,41 Few studies have reported the prevalence of isolated NSSTTAs in older adults,11–13 and none has examined the association of isolated NSSTTAs with CVD or CHD mortality or nonfatal events in older adults without clinical CHD.1 The sole prior report of outcomes in older adults from the CHS found that isolated NSSTTAs are associated with increased risk for incident heart failure.11

More than 80% of CHD deaths occur in adults >65 years of age; a large proportion of these deaths occur outside the hospital; and risk factors associated with CHD mortality have been shown to be somewhat different from risk factors that predict nonfatal CHD events.42 The identification of isolated NSSTTAs as a potential risk marker for fatal CHD events is important not only because of the high rates of CHD mortality in older adults but also because ECGs are readily available and frequently obtained for numerous indications other than screening in hospitals and clinics. At present, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine screening with an ECG in asymptomatic patients.43 Although our study does not provide evidence to support routine ECG screening in elderly patients, NSSTTAs are prognostically important, and their presence could trigger more intensive management of modifiable risk factors in the interest of reducing overall CHD mortality risk. However, further data like the present study are needed to understand how the presence of isolated minor NSSTTAs, easily detectable by practicing clinicians, could affect routine CVD and CHD risk communication in older adults.

Potential Limitations

The present study was limited by the fact that we analyzed the association between NSSTTAs and fatal and nonfatal CHD and CVD events using a single ECG at baseline. It is well established that NSSTTAs can represent transient physiological changes, and studies have demonstrated that persistent NSSTTAs, present on serial ECGs over time, are more significantly associated with CHD and CVD mortality.2 In addition, clinically silent MIs were not captured as part of the nonfatal MI end point and may represent a possible explanation for the lack of association between NSSTTAs and nonfatal MI. Although the CHS cohort provided a unique opportunity to compare the prevalence and prognostic significance of NSSTTAs across sex and race groups, the power of the race subgroup analysis is limited by the fewer number of black participants. Furthermore, other analyses, including the secondary, hypothesis-generating analyses examining the mechanism of cardiac death between those with and without isolated NSSTTAs, also had somewhat limited power. For example, although we detected a significant difference (P=0.02) between the proportions with primary arrhythmic death in our sample, we had only 55% power to detect this difference at a 2-sided α level of 0.05. Finally, the CHS cohort represents a group of highly motivated elderly participants who were in regular contact with health professionals and therefore may not represent the general elderly population followed up in a primary care setting. Nonetheless, the important risks we observed suggest that ECGs obtained for any reason be examined carefully for the presence of isolated NSSTTAs in asymptomatic older individuals.

Sources of Funding

The research reported in this article was supported by contract numbers N01-HC-85079 through N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, and N01-HC-45133 and grant number U01 HL080295 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Additional support was provided through R01 AG-15928, R01 AG-20098, and AG-027058 from the National Institute on Aging, R01 HL-075366 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, and the University of Pittsburgh Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center P30-AG-024827. A full list of principal CHS investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.chs-nhlbi.org/pi.htm.

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

Correspondence to Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM, Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N Lake Shore Dr, Suite 1102, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail

References

  • 1 Kumar A, Lloyd-Jones DM. Clinical significance of minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects. Cardiol Rev. 2007; 15: 133–142.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Daviglus ML, Liao Y, Greenland P, Dyer AR, Liu K, Xie X, Huang CF, Prineas RJ, Stamler J. Association of nonspecific minor ST-T abnormalities with cardiovascular mortality. JAMA. 1999; 281: 530–536.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Greenland P, Xie X, Liu K, Colangelo L, Liao Y, Daviglus ML, Agulnek AN, Stamler J. Impact of minor electrocardiographic ST-segment and/or T-wave abnormalities on cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 1068–1074.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Prineas RJ, Grandits G, Rautaharju PM, Cohen JD, Zhang ZM, Crow RS. Long-term prognostic significance of isolated minor electrocardiographic T-wave abnormalities in middle-aged men free of clinical cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 1391–1395.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kannel WB, Anderson K, McGee DL, Degatano LS, Stampfer MJ. Nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormality as a predictor of coronary heart disease. Am Heart J. 1987; 113: 370–376.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 De Bacquer D, Martins Pereira LS, De Backer G, De Henauw S, Kornitzer M. The predictive value of electrocardiographic abnormalities for total and cardiovascular disease mortality in men and women. Eur Heart J. 1994; 15: 1604–1610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Relationship of blood pressure, serum cholesterol, smoking habit, relative weight and ECG abnormalities to incidence of major coronary events: final report of the Pooling Project. J Chronic Dis. 1978; 31: 201–306.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 De Bacquer D, De Backer G. Electrocardiographic findings and global coronary risk assessment. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 268–270.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Larsen CT, Dahlin J, Blackburn H, Scharling H, Appleyard M, Sigurd B, Schnohr P. Prevalence and prognosis of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy, ST segment depression and negative T-wave. Eur Heart J. 2002; 23: 315–324.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1837–1847.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gottdiener JS, Arnold AM, Aurigemma GP, Polak JF, Tracy RP, Kitzman DW, Gardin JM, Rutledge JE, Boineau RC. Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1628–1637.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rajala S, Kaltiala K, Haavisto M, Mattila K. Prevalence of ECG findings in very old people. Eur Heart J. 1984; 5: 168–174.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tervahauta M, Pekkanen J, Punsar S, Nissinen A. Resting electrocardiographic abnormalities as predictors of coronary events and total mortality among elderly men. Am J Med. 1996; 100: 641–645.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, Furberg CD, Gardin JM, Kronmal RA, Kuller LH, Manolio TA, Mittelmark MB, Newman AB. The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991; 1: 263–276.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tell GS, Fried LP, Hermanson B, Manolio TA, Newman AB, Borhani NO. Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1993; 3: 358–366.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Psaty BM, Kuller LH, Bild D, Burke GL, Kittner SJ, Mittelmark MB, Price TR, Rautaharju PM, Robbins J. Methods of assessing prevalent cardiovascular disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1995; 4: 270–277.Google Scholar
  • 17 O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Wolfson SKJ, Bond MG, Bommer W, Sheth S, Psaty BM, Sharrett AR, Manolio TA. The Cardiovascular Health Study: use of sonography to evaluate carotid atherosclerosis in the elderly. Stroke. 1991; 22: 1155–1163.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Furberg CD, Manolio TA, Psaty BM, Bild DE, Borhani NO, Newman AB, Tabatznik B, Rautaharju PM. Major ECG abnormalities in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 69: 1329–1335.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings. Littleton, Mass: John Wright-PSG Inc; 1982.Google Scholar
  • 20 Vitelli LL, Crow RS, Shahar E, Hutchinson RG, Rautaharju PM, Folsom AR. Electrocardiographic findings in a healthy biracial population. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 453–459.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kuller LH, Shemanski L, Psaty BM, Borhani NO, Gardin J, Haan MN, O'Leary DH, Savage PJ, Tell GS, Tracy R. Subclinical disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1995; 92: 720–726.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ives DG, Fitzpatrick AL, Bild DE, Psaty BM, Kuller LH, Crowley PM, Cruise RG, Theroux S. Surveillance and ascertainment of cardiovascular events. Ann Epidemiol. 1995; 4: 278–285.Google Scholar
  • 23 Mohlenkamp S. Subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and resting ECG abnormalities in an unselected general population. Atherosclerosis. 2008; 196: 786–794.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Newman AB, Naydeck BL, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Edmundowicz D, O'Leary D, Kronmal R, Burke GL, Kuller LH. Relationship between coronary artery calcification and other measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease in older adults. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1674–1679.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kemp GL, Ellestad MH. The significance of hyperventilative and orthostatic T-wave changes on the electrocardiogram. Arch Intern Med. 1968; 121: 518–523.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schang SJ Jr, Pepine CJ. Transient asymptomatic S-T segment depression during daily activity. Am J Cardiol. 1977; 39: 396–402.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ostrander LD Jr. The relation of “silent” T wave inversion to cardiovascular disease in an epidemiologic study. Am J Cardiol. 1970; 25: 325–328.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Guazzi M, Fiorentini C, Polese A, Magrini F, Olivari MT. Stress-induced and sympathetically-mediated electrocardiographic and circulatory variations in the primary hyperkinetic heart syndrome. Cardiovasc Res. 1975; 9: 342–354.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Taggart P, Carruthers M, Somerville W. Emotions, catecholamines, and the electrocardiogram. In: Yu PN, Goodwin JF, eds. Progress in Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1978: 103.Google Scholar
  • 30 Short D. Clinical significance of minor ST-T depression in resting electrocardiogram. Br Heart J. 1972; 34: 377–382.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Haissaguerre M, Derval N, Sacher F, Jesel L, Deisenhofer I, de Roy L, Pasquie J-L, Nogami A, Coureau G, Chene G, Klein GJ, Clementy J. Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 2016–2023.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ohira T, Iso H, Imano H, Kitamura A, Sato S, Nakagawa Y, Naito Y, Sankai T, Tanigawa T, Yamagishi K, Iida M, Shimamoto T. Prospective study of major and minor ST-T abnormalities and risk of stroke among Japanese. Stroke. 2003; 34: e250–e253.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Baseline risk factors and their association with outcome in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 79: 756–762.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Crow RS, Prineas RJ, Hannan PJ, Grandits G, Blackburn H. Prognostic associations of Minnesota Code serial electrocardiographic change classification with coronary heart disease mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 138–144.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sigurdsson E, Sigfusson N, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G. Silent ST-T changes in an epidemiologic cohort study: a marker of hypertension or coronary heart disease, or both. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1140–1147.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dekker JM, Schouten EG, Klootwijk P, Pool J, Kromhout D. ST segment and T wave characteristics as indicators of coronary heart disease risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25: 1321–1326.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M, Blackburn H. Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women. Heart. 1998; 80: 570–577.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Kornitzer M, Myny K, Doyen Z, Blackburn H. Prognostic value of ischemic electrocardiographic findings for cardiovascular mortality in men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 680–685.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Liao YL, Liu KA, Dyer A, Schoenberger JA, Shekelle RB, Colette P, Stamler J. Major and minor electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of death from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular diseases and all causes in men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12: 1494–1500.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Denes P, Larson JC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Prineas RJ, Greenland P. Major and minor ECG abnormalities in asymptomatic women and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. JAMA. 2007; 297: 978–985.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ostrander LD Jr, Brandt RL, Kjelsberg MO, Epstein FH. Electrocardiographic findings among the adult population of a total natural community, Tecumseh, Michigan. Circulation. 1965; 31: 888–898.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pearte CA, Furberg CD, O'Meara ES, Psaty BM, Kuller L, Powe NR, Manolio T. Characteristics and baseline clinical predictors of future fatal versus nonfatal coronary heart disease events in older adults. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2177–2185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 43 US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for coronary heart disease: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 569–572.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
circulationahaCirculationCirculationCirculation0009-73221524-4539Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE16122008

The prevalence and clinical significance of isolated minor nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities (NSSTTAs; characterized by minor or upsloping ST-segment depression or T-wave flattening or inversion <1.0 mm) are poorly characterized in older adults. In the Cardiovascular Health Study, we observed that the prevalence of isolated NSSTTAs was 7.2% among those ≥65 years of age without major ECG abnormalities. The presence of isolated NSSTTAs was significantly associated with risk for all-cause mortality and especially coronary mortality (with nearly double the risk) but not nonfatal myocardial infarction. The association was independent of measures of subclinical atherosclerosis burden and left ventricular mass. In secondary analyses, isolated NSSTTAs appeared to be most strongly associated with primary arrhythmic death, suggesting that they may in part represent arrhythmogenic substrate. Whereas ECGs are not currently recommended as a routine screening measure, these data suggest that ECGs obtained for any clinical reason in older adults should be examined carefully for the presence of isolated NSSTTAs. More than 80% of coronary deaths occur in adults >65 years of age. Thus, physicians and patients could consider more intensive management of modifiable risk factors in those with isolated NSSTTAs to prevent fatal events.