Accurate Classification of Cardiomyopathy Diagnosis by Chromatin Accessibility
Tissue-specific chromatin accessibility identifies active genomic regions, integrates genetic information with exposure history, provides unique signatures that remain stable over longer timescales than gene transcription, and requires limited input material.1 Chromatin accessibility profiles have enabled precise molecular subtyping of a wide variety of tumors.2 For cardiomyopathies, however, tissue biopsy is not routinely performed, and pathogenesis is most often determined by clinical information alone. Nevertheless, cardiologists are commonly faced with diagnostic dilemmas, such as a patient who has cardiomyopathy with obstructive coronary artery disease involving <3 vessels. Here, knowledge of cardiomyopathy pathogenesis would likely affect prognosis3 and guide management.4 A more precise molecular diagnosis could also help clinicians avoid incorrect diagnoses on the basis of clinical criteria alone, as recently described for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).5 Here, we propose to leverage the rich information content of chromatin accessibility to improve the accuracy of cardiomyopathy classification.
Human heart specimens were obtained from the Southwest Transplant Alliance, the UTSW Cardiac Tissue Biobank (STU 092010-193), and the HCM patient registry (STU 082017-072) after approval by the local institutional review board and proper informed consent. Healthy specimens were obtained from donor hearts rejected for cardiac transplantation, and neither the underlying diagnosis nor genetic pathogenesis was established in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Disease specimens were matched with healthy controls, although one unmatched healthy specimen was retained in our final analysis attributable to the quality control failure of individual cardiomyopathy samples. The assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing was performed on cardiomyocyte nuclei.2 Sequencing reads were processed and mapped to the reference GRCh38 human genome. A Random Forest Classifier was built using uniquely accessible regions with the number of trees set to 1000. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed with 100 iterations of leaving out 1 replicate pair for testing and using the remaining samples to build the classifier. Anonymized data have been made publicly available at dbGaP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/).
We profiled chromatin accessibility (Figure A and B) in 21 individuals (6 healthy; 5 ischemic cardiomyopathy; 5 NICM; 5 HCM). Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection analysis of chromatin accessibility resolved healthy and cardiomyopathy samples by diagnosis (Figure C). In a 2-way comparison of healthy versus cardiomyopathy samples, 1066 regions were differentially accessible (Figure D). Focusing on uniquely accessible genomic regions, we generated a heat map to highlight differential accessibility between healthy tissue and individual cardiomyopathy subtypes (Figure E). Analysis of coaccessible loci from each group yielded transcription factor motifs and potential downstream target genes (Figure F). On the basis of this analysis, we speculate that MEF2 (myocyte enhancer factor-2) transcription factors activate contractile gene expression in ischemic cardiomyopathy, nuclear hormone receptors influence cellular adhesion programs in NICM, and ETS (E twenty-six domain) transcription factors activate aberrant developmental processes in HCM.
Next, we sought to improve cardiomyopathy discrimination by using only the focused set of chromatin accessibility peaks from Figure E. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection analysis showed that the refined subset of peaks improved cardiomyopathy classification (Figure G; compare with Figure C). Consequently, we trained a Random Forest Classifier to nominate a cardiomyopathy diagnosis on the basis of the informative subset of chromatin accessibility peaks (Figure H). Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed across all samples, and the area under the receiver-operator curve demonstrated excellent algorithm performance (Figure I; red line). Given that clinical benchtop sequencers can generate 20 million reads within hours, we repeated the leave-one-out cross-validation analysis after random selection of 20 million reads from each sample (ie, downsampling) and observed little drop-off in algorithm performance (Figure I; blue line).
Last, we present 3 simulated applications using the diagnostic algorithm with 20 million randomly selected reads per sample. First, chromatin accessibility was profiled in a single replicate for a patient who had HCM with limited tissue availability (Figure J), which was consistent with internal validations (Figure H). Second, we analyzed specimens from a patient with NICM before and after left ventricular assist device implantation. This example confirmed the pathogenesis in the pre–left ventricular assist device sample and suggested that left ventricular assist device treatment alters chromatin accessibility (Figure J). Third, we highlight a case in which ischemic cardiomyopathy was diagnosed by coronary angiography before bypass surgery, yet chromatin accessibility at transplant favored an NICM classification (Figure J). Consistent with this observation, the patient developed 4-chamber enlargement without regional wall motion abnormalities between bypass surgery and heart transplant, suggesting a superimposed NICM, although definitive clinical evidence is lacking.
In conclusion, our study establishes proof-of-concept for a cardiomyopathy diagnostic algorithm using chromatin accessibility signatures at a sequencing depth achievable by benchtop instruments. Nonetheless, 2 important limitations deserve mention. First, all specimens were taken from the left ventricle to ensure matched anatomical locations, rather than the conventional right ventricular biopsy site. Second, a small number of samples were included in the study, so future external validation is necessary to confirm these findings. If replicated, however, the proposed strategy could enable rapid diagnosis (Figure K) and facilitate precision medicine approaches for patients with cardiomyopathy.
Article Information
Research materials, experimental procedures, and protocols are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Footnote
Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms
- HCM
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- NICM
- nonischemic cardiomyopathy
References
1.
Klemm SL, Shipony Z, Greenleaf WJ. Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:207–220. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8
2.
Corces MR, Granja JM, Shams S, Louie BH, Seoane JA, Zhou W, Silva TC, Groeneveld C, Wong CK, Cho SW, et al; Cancer Genome Atlas Analysis Network. The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science. 2018;362:eaav1898. doi: 10.1126/science.aav1898
3.
Pecini R, Moller DV, Torp-Pedersen C, Hassager C, Kober L. Heart failure etiology impacts survival of patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2011;149:211–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.01.011
4.
Bozkurt B, Colvin M, Cook J, Cooper LT, Deswal A, Fonarow GC, Francis GS, Lenihan D, Lewis EF, McNamara DM, et al; American Heart Association Committee on Heart Failure and Transplantation of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies for specific dilated cardiomyopathies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;134:e579–e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000455
5.
Alashi A, Desai RM, Khullar T, Hodges K, Rodriguez ER, Tan C, Popovic ZB, Thamilarasan M, Wierup P, Lever HM, et al. Different histopathologic diagnoses in patients with clinically diagnosed hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after surgical myectomy. Circulation. 2019;140:344–346. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040129
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Heart Association, Inc.
History
Published online: 12 September 2022
Published in print: 13 September 2022
Keywords
Subjects
Authors
Disclosures
Disclosures None.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by the American Heart Association (17PRE33670730), National Institutes of Health (HL136604, HL133642, and HL135217 to Dr Munshi; DP2GM128203 to Dr Hon; UM1HG011996 to Drs Munshi and Hon; R01HL102478 and P50HD087351 to Dr Mammen), the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1009838 to Dr Munshi; 1019804 to Dr Hon), the March of Dimes Foundation (#5-FY13-203 to Dr Munshi), the Department of Defense (PR172060 to Drs Munshi and Hon), CPRIT (Dr Hon), and the Green Center for Reproductive Biology (Dr Hon).
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
- The integrative biology of the heart: mechanisms enabling cardiac plasticity, Journal of Experimental Biology, 227, 20, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249348
- Adopting artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review, Hypertension Research, 47, 3, (685-699), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-023-01469-7
Loading...
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Personal login Institutional LoginPurchase Options
Purchase this article to access the full text.
eLetters(0)
eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.
Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.